Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Michelle Malkin calls out liberal hypocrisy on Russia" video.

  1. Mueller makes indictments like ham sandwiches. Then when the indicted individuals actually send lawyers over to defend their clients, and demand to see the evidence, Mueller goes into Full Stall. Obvious put-up job for political purposes, and he got caught with his pants down.
    4
  2. Alexis Baumann: This is where the hypocrisy is really blatant. I mean, a child of 3 can connect the dots DIRECTLY between Bill and Hillary's financial gain and sweetheart deals we made with them during her tenure as Sec'y of State. Uranium-1 is the kind of scandal that only a Democrat could hide in plain view. And yes. $500,000 in Bill's pocket for one speech is as obvious a payoff as has ever been swept under the carpet as any I've seen.
    3
  3. One of the things the American press doesn't really cover is how, after the collapse of Soviet rule, the crooks took over in Russia, with a lot of American carpetbaggers basically raping the country. Putin isn't getting re-elected because it's a fake election. He's getting re-elected because he's wildly popular for cracking down on the takeover of the former Soviet Union by a bunch of crooks and robber barons. And if we think our own Nationalist Populist movement, here in America, is a real phenomenon, multiply ANY problems we've had with immigration by a factor of 10, and imagine the phenomenon operating over a far longer time span. As here, the people didn't want to allow Islam to turn the clock back 900 years, and be run by Muslim theocrats.
    3
  4. Sam Iam: Yes. And what's so funny about it is when they're reciting the daily dose of narrative, they think they're smarter than everybody else, with the latest news and latest spin. People who do their own research and check other sources know how weak and intellectually lazy they are. I'm still cautiously optimistic that Trump will end up doing us a lot of good.
    3
  5. And Obammer had them back-burner any Russian interference, because that might call Hillary's victory into question. And there was no re-count, because it might reveal rampant voter fraud in their bought-and-paid-for city machines.
    2
  6. Ragnar Danneskjold: Crimea was already 90% Russian and voted to be Russian.
    2
  7. Yeah. We saw how effective those Russkies were. One protest, here, for Trump, that got about 10 people to show up, and another across town for Clinton, that got about 10 people to show up. They talk about Russian collusion and in my mind's eye, I keep seeing guys in dirty underwear playing on their computer in Mom's basement. Sure, the Russians do this shit. Sure the Americans do this shit. And of course, Putin wanted Trump over Clinton. Clinton would do anything to get her way, including starting a war for no good reason, or worse, if it meant she could wrap herself in the flag, and be seen as a big, strong leader. And she had no problem feeding the fires of Islamic terrorism if that meant causing problems for Russia, who live a lot closer to the Middle East. This is seen as a legitimate tactic in cold-war-hangover Deep State, engaged in by Neocon/Neoliberal types for decades. Weaponizing the Taliban against the Soviets in the '70s and '80s, then bitching about the Taliban, years later, without admitting that we're the ones who built up and then exploited a very regressive and warlike interpretation of Islam, so we could beat the Soviets. Much of what we don't like about the Russians the last few years is THEIR style of preserving THEIR culture against the rise of Islam and Sharia on and within their own borders. They're more brutal and ruthless than we are, maybe (although I kind of doubt it), but things also went a lot farther on and within their borders. Imagine how we would feel if Muslims moved in, bred themselves up a majority in, say, Tennessee, and decided to declare their independence and impose Sharia Law in Nashville. Maybe we'd have a different take on Chechnya? I dunno. Just asking.
    2
  8. Yes. Tomi's still pretty young to have as big a platform as she has.
    1
  9. "I just know he's a racist." "What's he done that's racist?" "Everything!" "Specifically?" "Uhhh... uhhhhh... I don't talk to InfoWars."
    1
  10. Darling Dear: Let me summarize your statement for the rest of the crowd: RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!
    1
  11. Yes. No tinfoil hat guy, here, but if you believe the narrative put together for Wikileaks and Q, then it would explain why Hillary sees a "vast right-wing conspiracy." She thought she had it all tied up in a bow, and yet she was thwarted at every turn by leaks and uncomfortable truths that she thought she'd successfully buried.
    1