Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Tyrus: I find this tragically disgusting" video.

  1. There's no justification for his blatant disregard for human life.
    7
  2.  @christaber4703  Trump fought them with all the tools at his disposal, because they were doing the same to him, and on far weaker grounds. I'm surprised he didn't step in a single obstruction snare. That was clearly the strategy. Attack, attack, attack, and hope he makes a mistake, because then it doesn't matter that the original case was smoke and mirrors. What was done to Trump was reprehensible and frankly terrifying. The brazen weaponization of federal agencies against partisan foes is plain as day. Obama started it and his appointees and like-minded career civil service continued it against the next sitting president. It's the most brazen abuse of office I've ever seen. George W. set it up with Patriot Act, and Obama swung for the fences. We now have a highly partisan surveillance state. FISA = Star Chamber. No obligation on the part of the FBI to present exculpatory evidence. Nope. That dossier is good as gold. Trust us on its provenance. We wouldn't lie to you, judge. NObody in the FBI has been held to account, except one minor functionary who was caught falsifying records. All the big stuff that went on? Nada. Comey should be in jail. Brennan should be in jail. Clapper should be in jail. Weissman should be in jail. Mueller should be in a sanitarium...
    3
  3.  mike fisher  You'd be surprised how many people are in the know. But not enough people have felt the pinch bad enough to do anything about it. Bad as you might think things are, they're not really that bad for most of us. But we are getting on our last nerve.
    2
  4. Fauci was a constant thorn in Trump's side. Of course Biden likes him.
    2
  5.  @judytullos9889  No. I'm actually the first person everyone should ask. I always give the right advice: Ask your doctor.
    1
  6.  @ConcernedPublic  some truth in what you and @Fyrch Myrddin are saying. I don't think progressives set out to enrich themselves. They just have an inordinate faith in government bureaucrats to actually deliver on whatever their pie-in-the-sky, feel-good dreams are. It's the bureaucrat who actually has to make progressive dreams a reality, regardless of whether they're competent to do so, or whether or not there are actually sufficient resources available to actually implement those dreams. Then there's the whole "The dream slips away" as the economy/ecology adjusts to the new rule set in ways the surprise NOone but progressives, who insist that they're RIGHT, and they just put the wrong guy in charge. Our founding fathers KNEW about the oligarchs of Byzantine Rome. They studied the Fall of Rome, extensively. Any new agency or institution is, in a sense, a new life form introduced into the ecology/economy. It doesn't what birthed it, it is alive, in a sense, and it will grow to the absolute limit of the available resources, and BEYOND available resources, as long as it can get away with it, just like rabbits will breed beyond the capacity of the ecosystem to support them. In Nature, they just die back. In government, as long as they can keep borrowing or printing money, they can defy reality for long periods, causing untold damage and economic and ecological ruin. The thing I don't get is how we feel like we're failing if we're not growing, when we should be maximizing quality of life. Government's insatiable appetite for resources and power always pushes growth rather than sustainability.
    1