Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Giuliani: If Comey knew Steele wasn't reliable, then he is guilty" video.

  1. Meh. It depends. I imagine there are a number of lines of enquiry that Horowitz and his crew are all set up to pursue, that would be foundational to anything Huber could do. The new tidbit is that Huber was instead investigating Hillary. It all depends, now, on what Barr means by "fruition." Are they wrapping things up and it's a no-bill? Or are we about to start hearing about grand juries? It's become fashionable, lately, to simply list a bunch of career-destroying evidence, and then go on to say you won't be prosecuting any of it. That's the standard being set by Comey and Mueller. As big a thorn as Comey's been in Trump's side, he at the same time single-handedly destroyed Hillary's chances of being elected. Or at least that's how he's portrayed. You might argue that, as with the FISA courts, he was just rushing to the microphone to get ahead of truth-bombs about to fall, anyway.
    1
  2. That's the thing. There've been felonies laying around in plain sight, and the only reason there've been no indictments is because of who committed them and who their friends are.
    1