Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Liberals trash Jon Stewart for backing lab-leak theory" video.

@gregbors8364 There's a case to be made fr supporting orderly transition. But where Pence dropped the ball was in certifying elections that had HUGE problems being certified. Audits around the country are finding more mail-ins without chain-of-custody verification than needed to swing the election. Chain-of-custody is required by law. Refusing to certify questionable results is not necessarily overturning the results. Pence "turning on Trump" is not necessarily Pence turning on Trump. I still don't trust the guy. I think it might be better for liberty if we LET the Dems do their theater while the various states run their own audits and let the chips fall where they may. When 50% of the American public thinks they pulled a fast one, that's not free and fair elections, unless you are transparent and let the forensic audits do their thing. Personally, I think Trump won pretty big, but if he had fought it to the fullest extent, he'd've confirmed the bias of his opponents as an authoritarian (which he isn't). He has much more power to win hearts and minds as a martyr than he ever had as president. Watching the Democrat administration bungle everything is red-pilling millions. We've already seen the shift in the 2020 elections, with the monolithic black and Hispanic votes splitting. This is terrifying for Democrats.
3
@cjarchives9711 MSM: Where big corporate and big government meet.
2
@Jeremy_the_bot Time for your NPC update. It's now permitted to speak of the lab-leak hypothesis without being canceled. That's why my respect for Jon Stewart remains pretty low. He didn't come out with this until it became acceptable to do so. Now Cho Bi Den says it should be investigated, so it's OK, now.
2
@davidmccumber8222 Not radical thought. But the belief that wonks in government should have all the power. "Everything under the state. Nothing against the state." Fascism is just another flavor of collectivism. The collective supersedes the rights of the individual in all forms of socialism. Most people make artificial distinctions between brand names. The difference between them is the difference between Toyota and Chevrolet. "Left" and "Right" don't cut it, because as soon as you ARE the establishment, resisting change makes you a conservative. Restricting free speech is a "right" thing, even though "right" means you're FOR free speech, today. The proper continuum is more like this: Chaos - Totalitarian - Authoritarian - Limited free markets - more free markets - totally free markets - Chaos A topologist would eagerly identify "chaos" at both ends of the spectrum and make a circle out of the line segment. But it's a total myth that the Nazis were far right. It's a handy narrative when you want the state to have more power but you don't want to look bad.
2
@Jeremy_the_bot That doesn't wash. If they had listened to Trump, the lock-downs would've ended almost immediately, because of all the great clinical work that was being done by doctors around the world. But that didn't fit with the agenda of pushing a vaccine. If the coof is treatable, then that eliminates all justification for the power grab. Trump's only mistake was in deferring to the bureaucratic medical establishment, rather than letting science decide. And no, Fauci is NOT the science. He's a self-interested party who had a lot to lose if NIAID's funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan were exposed. What most people call science today is "pet science." Scientists are people, too, and they are just as prone to selling-out for personal gain as anybody else. This whole nightmare was from people deferring to authority and "experts." That's what got us into Vietnam War. That's what got us into Iraq. That's what got us to accept lock-downs for over a year. That's why there's POLITICAL pressure to get the jab, as we speak. They're never THE experts. Just the experts who are on retainer and push what their masters wish them to push. You see the same thing in climate science. All the money goes to alarmists. None of the money goes to skeptics. That could be overcome by scientists with integrity if the establishment didn't also cancel those independent scientists.
2
... which goes to show how shallow and fickle Colbert audiences are. One guy tells a joke and they're suddenly OK with the lab-leak hypothesis. They're not thinking for themselves. They're just taking their lead from MSM.
1
@cjordan1161 Incurable case of TDS or just someone lonely trying to trigger as many replies as possible
1
A true liberal wouldn't. But liberal now means that you're in lock-step with the establishment, which is in lock step with the Democrat National Committee. We're getting a taste of one-party rule, and nobody's liking it except The Party.
1