Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Aba N Preach" channel.

  1. 33
  2. 9
  3. 8
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. The girl's running a control drama on you, partly because she's hurt and partly to see if it works. I'm not all New-Age, but there is a good New-Age book called "Celestine Prophecy" that has a lot of good pop psychology in there, in between the mystical hippie-tree-hugger bullshit. I don't go into auras, but I do recommend finding an old tree and sitting with your back to it, or putting a hand on it and contemplating its long life, there. It's very refreshing, welcoming, and humbling. The book breaks down control dramas into 4 types: Intimidator, inquisitor, aloof, and poor me. People who want to control you will slip into one of those 4 roles. Inquisitor is using questioning to get you on the defensive. Intimidator is pretty obvious. Poor me at the other extreme is a way of getting energy by getting people to feel sorry for you (martyrs/victims). The "aloof" is where you try to get the other person to chase after you by pulling away from them. Anyway, it's a pretty good book in some ways. Its main thesis is summed up by a weird metaphor. A complete person is an "O." An incomplete person is a "C." Two C's together, back to back make an "O." It says that there are people STUCK at "C" who think that a mate would make them an "O," when the only way it's going to work is if both partners are already an "O" going into the relationship. If both people have their shit together, then being together is pretty much all good. And if things go bad, the relationship doesn't ever go negative, because both partners are autonomous and will simply leave a bad situation. There's some good common sense in that. And the "C" versus "O" metaphor isn't perfect. Like Preach and his wife being opposites. They're both C's, according to this description, but they capital-C Complement each other, so everything's covered. Dad cut the grass. Mom liked sitting out on the lawn, barefoot, with that grass between her toes. She liked spreading a blanket for a picnic, and he made the picnic spot. Mom had her space of peace and beauty. Dad got cold beer and fried chicken in the shade at the end of the day. So that "O" and "C" thing has its limitations. But even with their complementary skill sets, I get the sense that Preach and his wife are both pretty much O's, emotionally. Heh. If you're into crystals and mystical stuff, you'll REALLY like TCP. The main takeaway for me was the 4 kinds of control drama. I described them well enough that you don't have to even read TCP. You've got the only thing I found useful in it. Breaking it down into those 4 kinds of control dramas makes it easy for you to understand when the conversation's going sideways and this person, whether they realize it or not, is trying to control you, and you can decide not to participate in that drama. With or without a "good-bye," that person is getting your silence and absence. You LET their words be the last that are spoken between you.
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1