Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Timcast"
channel.
-
450
-
111
-
99
-
41
-
The pull-out of 2,000 troops in Syria is NOTHING compared to the 40,000 we have in the region and whom the 2,000 will join. But it's a step in the right direction towards a more disciplined (military) spending profile in the federal budget. Reducing the likelihood of war is GREAT for the budget. Getting NATO countries to pay for their OWN defense is a good thing, budgetarily.
And Trump doesn't have to make any big cuts in the welfare state to get the domestic side to come down. Work requirements for able-bodied food stamps recipients has had a HUGE impact wherever it's been implemented. Don't want to call anybody a freeloader, but it seems that a sizable percentage of people can get along without food stamps, when there's work attached. Still a lot of work to do on multi-generation welfare way of life, where babies are brought into this world in a totally disrespectful way (into shithole family and community situations), when they're not killed before birth.
Democrats want to address the shit that happens. Republicans want less bad shit to happen in the first place, and it starts with the family, and Democrat policies that destroy family.
34
-
25
-
23
-
Be sure to bring up Hearst when people say they yearn for the "good old days," when news was objective. It's NEVER been objective. The 1st Amendment is there to protect dissident/dissenting speech, based on the ORIGINAL PAMPHLETEERS of the American Revolution.
It used to be more subtle, is all. I noticed this in the 1970s, when I was coming of age. They "objectively reported" what they reported on, but unless you did a lot of digging, you wouldn't know how many things they chose NOT to report, thereby suppressing 'inconvenient truths.' In the '70s, though, you didn't have 100 people on the street with video cameras in their hand-held devices, so when legacy media cherry-pick and slant reports on Antifa actions or the Covington Kids, there's a viral video from INDEPENDENT media that shows what's REALLY happening.
Doesn't mean I trust independent media. I just want to see competing media (not media oligopolies) put it all out there, and let the public pick and choose what's more believable. I like biased reporting, and I want to see left, right, middle, space-alien, and overweight bubble-gum chewers to put out what THEY see, and fact check ALL the SOBs.
19
-
14
-
12
-
@itsokaytobeclownpilled5937 : Perhaps you haven't noticed the frenzied resistance he's met at every turn. I think Repubs AND Dems would've banded together to impeach him if he'd pulled out of Syria before this. You have to prepare the ground before you.
And really, bad as illegal immigration is, IF we can control the border and return to SANE immigration policy, then the illegals who are already here just mainly need to be assimilated. The key is to stem the FLOW. If we do THAT, then we can absorb the people already here, no problem. Just turn off the welfare cornucopia. If you are here in this country, and aren't a citizen, and can't show means of support, then go back where you came from. We USED to require those attempting to enter our country to SHOW that they could support themselves, before allowing them in.
What? You're just here for the Free Stuff? Sorry. We're fresh out. Turns out that we're gonna take care of our OWN, first. And that's the hole in the left's argument for open borders. You're leaving your own people in a bind just so you can virtue signal. If I were a poor person in the U.S., I wouldn't vote Democrat at ALL, until they pull their heads out of their asses on open borders. They swamp poorer communities with illegals and the crime that comes with them. It's destroying a sizable chunk of the butt-hurt-and-guilty-elitist-white-liberal coalition.
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yes. And what seemed like odd passivity in spots may turn out to be just LETTING them win, and letting the world see what happened. I think if Trump had acted any sooner, we might have had a coup, already. He pushes, but not too hard. Then lets the Dems beat him on procedural grounds, and they can't help themselves. They twist the process all out of shape and no one stops them.
But if you look across the Atlantic, you see how the center-left have done basically the same thing, and the people are rising up. "You don't represent us!" UK voted for BREXIT, but the bureaucrats in London and Brussels have fought it tooth and nail, by controlling the decision-making process at the top. The people are getting sick and tired of that shit, and are finally rising in rebellion. It's ugly stuff for the center-left in Europe, and any thinking person, watching the American Left use the exact same tactics to secure short-term WIN, knows this will lead to the shattering of the center-left coalition, and a rapid growth of support for the right and center-right.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ECP90 : Actually, Fascism is the means by which Western societies "Progress" into Socialism. And when you're on that insane path, you set yourself up for the exact kinds of economic and social crises that drive the most regressive and violent factions on the left. When you look at the American system, we have adopted virtually every feature of Nazi Germany's political economy, with government over everything, nothing outside of government, and nothing against government. Stranglehold on the public square that only the Internet has broken, which is why the elites are feeling so threatened, right now. They only have about half of the dumbest citizens on their side, and falling fast. The majority they saw stretching out endlessly before them has imploded, with libertarian values held by most people, EVERYwhere, are beginning to express themselves in the polls.
Hitherto captive voting blocs are peeling away from the Democrats. If more than 10% or so of blacks vote Republican, it DESTROYS the Democrats. And Trump's popularity among black MEN is climbing upwards of 30% in some polls. The wahmen are still 90% Free Stuff for Me, but the men are waking up.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don't wreck what works for the vast majority of people, to prop up a small segment. If you're liberal and you want to make a change, don't look to government force to solve it. YOU help somebody. As a conservative, that's what I do. And I figure if everybody who likes to virtue-signal and take my money for their compassion got off their ass and helped just one person, we'd solve the homeless problem - for example - one person at a time, without any force. I took in a vision-impaired person, who just needed a safe, quiet place to take classes on Internet skills, as a vision-impairment assistant to website developers (a growth industry).
This isn't a hard case, but it did help a guy who fell through the cracks. Just one. And that's how it works. If you haven't taken anybody in, yourself, then shut your mouth about "living wage." It's going straight from idealism to unintended destruction, which is the calling card of the left. In the cities where the homeless problem is out of control, I see a ton of virtue-signalers and a bunch of mansions occupied by virtue signalers with NO homeless being taken in. No INDIVIDUAL help.
Liberals don't understand human nature and how the world works. How compassion works. They think that career unelected bureaucrats know better than people how to help people. But you make a career out of administering programs that take money from one person to give to another. Bureaucrats don't care if they're efficient, nor do they really care about the people they're helping. They end up screwing both taxpayer and beneficiary. all unintended. But after many years of watching how things actually work, I'm more and more convinced that leftists are either stupid, willfully ignorant or liars.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Health insurance executives are trapped. The government tells them what they have to cover, and it can change overnight. So they cozy up to the government to stay in business.
Nobody remembers, because it happened so long ago, but health insurance was invented by big corporations as an incentive for prospective employees after Franklin Delano Roosevelt instituted wage freezes during the Great Depression (which FDR capitalized on, to consolidate and perpetuate his power). Big corporations offered health and pension benefits.
Before this watershed moment in American history, local charities and benefactors gave to hospitals and built hospitals. The government only makes it SEEM like they're doing a better job than people with actual compassion and charitable instincts. Health care should be a personal and local-community thing, not a slush fund for bureaucrats.
Once the government stepped in, the system because essentially socialist/fascist, with a veneer of private enterprise, but CORRUPT private enterprise, because health care providers had to get in good with the government to stay in business. Inevitably, this led to heavy lobbying of Congress to pass laws that protected insurers and health care providers. The end result? Overpriced, low-quality care.
This is just how government works, or rather, doesn't work. When you make charity compulsory, you destroy the charitable instinct, and nobody feels any responsibility for their neighbor, because they already pay taxes for that sort of thing, and if anybody's falling through the cracks, that's someone else's fault.
1
-
My last visit to a hospital, last spring, was the scariest one yet. Not because of why I was there, but because hospitals have gone full-on bureaucrat, and saving money the way bureaucrats always do: Hire more staff to help the administrators and cut everything else to the bone. Teach nurses NOT to be compassionate. Put doctors into mass production, that is, when they're not filling out reams of paperwork that all the bureaucrats insist is CRUCIAL INFORMATION, until they decide a month later that the don't like the data, so they flush all the work done by everybody under them right down the toilet, while they dream up NEW forms to fill out, in a desperate attempt to feel relevant in an industry to which their only contribution is finding new forms of red tape to cover their own asses with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think most jobs can be re-tooled pretty easily for social distance. I can see all kinds of new jobs opening up, like professional shopping, where one person does multiple orders at once, cutting the contagion by factors of 2, 3 or 4. And I think it's actually more efficient, because it's one person in an efficient vehicle making one slightly extended trip, while everybody else's car stays home. Also niches in education are going to open up, left and right, and teachers across the country are getting crash courses in distance learning. People are going to start WANTING the online experience for education, and there will be teaching jobs left and right. And education will get a TON CHEAPER. The teachers used to BE the school, and NOW it's the ADMINISTRATORS. You can make a teacher pretty rich by hiring them, directly. They don't have to charge much to out-compete what legacy institutions are doing.
1
-
1
-
@killcat1971 : Neo-Luddism r'ars its ugly head in yet ANOTHER generation! Automation doesn't eliminate good jobs. It opens up NEW jobs. Every time automation saves a little bit of money for someone, the whole society gets a little richer. More people can afford to hire an artist for that basement mural they always wanted. I think that as the complexities of this world mount, there will be niches opening up for full-time jobs where all you do is handle the grocery shopping and organize the bills. Someone who knows how to play the credit-card game can save a household thousands of dollars, by shifting debt to the new credit card, using it's 1st-year-no-interest for one year, and open up another card in a year or two.
There're all kinds of services like that. And who knows what's to come? Maybe they come up with anti-grav back packs and everybody wants a nice landing pad built out in their back yard. Landing-pad builders would then be a thing, employing the same people who used to do wood-frame house construction, before IT went kaput! Thing is, the steady march of progress continues despite all our efforts to mess things up and meddle in 10-variable questions with 1-variable understanding.
We don't need to artificially ACCELERATE automation by artificially propping up minimum wage. Minimum wage - like ALL libtard feel-good policies - is an ATTACK on people trying to work their way out of poverty. Libtards always hurt the ones they love, buying their devotion with crumbs. For votes.
Libtards see one person in trouble and it's nothing to them to punish all those who are on the ragged edge of being in trouble in order to help that one person who randomly came to their attention and became their focus and sole purpose in life, entitling them to the hard-earned money in your pocket. Your business is BARELY profitable? Well, here are a bunch of extra costs some libtard decided you would have to pay, so the libtard could point to the person he helped. Too bad if your business goes under. We helped the guy we set out to help, and DAMN THE TORPEDOS! FULL SPEED AHEAD! Because we're righter than rightie.
The guy who's BARELY paying her (SWIDT?) bills gets destroyed by a 20% increase in energy prices. Everything costs more, especially heating and cooling her home. That "green legislation" that everybody cheered just pushed another 20 million, barely-gettin'-by working poor below the poverty line. Didn't think about THAT added cost. And from the progressive's point of view, if they never hear about or see that person they hurt, then life goes on and they can still feel proud of themselves, because they can go straight to the government for proof that they're doing something for the people they say they care about.
The consequences of progressivism are diffuse and the benefits obvious. You can put that guy's face on t.v. that you helped. But nobody's talking about the accumulating weight of small hardships visited on everyone by helping just the one with everybody's money.
Most of the time, the average citizen just tightens their belt and soldiers on. Especially the BEST people who are just on hard times. Those are the people that libtards despise and seek to destroy at every opportunity, usually in the name of helping them, but it can also be to "save the planet" or "kill evil Iraqis," and "it's a cost we will gladly pay!" when they've got all THEIR bills on auto-pay and their checking account just grows every month until they have enough to buy another expensive toy. They'll sacrifice the delivery date on their Ferrari, but they don't think about the guy who's postponing new shoes for her kid, who's outgrown the pair he's wearing, now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Uh. 10 bucks an hour is 400 a week times 4.333333333..... weeks per month is about $1730 per month, which is closer to $2,000 than $1,000. Other than piss-poor arithmetic, you make some decent points. $1000 a month for everybody means 3 or 4 people can share a house and play all day. Or just sell arts and crafts or something else that's not sustainable without an infusion of cash from taxpayers.
Most people want more than that, but many of those people will find it difficult to get off their asses and do much about it, because vague discontent doesn't generally rise to the threshold of the kind of desperation it takes to work your way out of your situation. Not all people are like that, but my brother is. He's generally bummed at what he can't have, but it never rose to the level of his having to bite the bullet and CHANGE his situation. Full belly, lots of sci-fi to read and watch on DVD, warm place, warm bed, roof over his head. He's pretty content, most of the time. I had more strikes against me, and he's probably smarter than I am, but in my stupidity, I worked a LOT of 60-80-hour weeks, supporting myself and earning math and geology degrees.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Life is tradeoffs.
If she had gotten married straight out of high school or college, she'd probably still be dissatisfied, but for different reasons. "Is this it? Cooking and cleaning, day after day, for kids who just take, take, take, and an unloving husband with a beer belly, who hasn't excited me for 10 years? I feel so trapped!"
This video looks pretty performative to me. What's she doing in a very unflattering evening gown, with a very unflattering hairdo, unflattering (Marilyn Manson) makeup, and wearing her mother's jewelry? That particular get-up and styling is for a 1940s movie star, and she ain't no movie star. She's an average-looking woman.
She should have no problem finding a man at 33, if she's willing to let her hair down, put on some jeans, and head out to the dirt races, or a baseball game. Maybe volunteer at a local charity or two. Good men show up in those places, too. They're where the best singles of marriageable age would be most likely to go.
You want to signal to the other sex that you have your shit together and can meet someone else more than half way? Volunteer at the food drive! Pitch in at habitat for humanity! Don't keep putting yourself in meat-market settings in pick-me mode.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We're undergoing a paradigm shift away from globalism. Nationalism is the short-term beneficiary, but LOCALism is the ultimate beneficiary. People are figuring out (again) that the "anointed nobility" aren't in touch with everyday life, let alone competent to direct all its activities
Remote learning got a huge boost. Smart institutions will foster that shift. Moribund institutions will resist that shift. Brick-and-mortar ain't goin' away, but it's clearly declining. I've been saying for years that it's really dumb to make your kid go to school and sit in a classroom with everybody their chronological age, getting a one-size-fits-all lesson, live, from a teacher who's aiming at the stupidest kid in the room, to get that kid a 'C' while the gifted kids are held back by the slowest student.
There's a lot of resistance to the shift in education, because the institutions AND the students 'brought up' in that institutional framework think that the way they've always done it is the best way. And teachers' egos drive a lot of it. They're SURE their students can't learn without their WONDERFUL teacher watering everything down and holding their hand on everything. But in my opinion, institutional definition of "Student Success" is to ensure that more students pass, whether they actually have mastered the content or not.
They'll never admit that, but it's exactly what they're pushing for, and it just leads to need for MORE hand-holding, and - of course - more MONEY, because "We need to remediate these learning deficits, and allow for 'differences in race, ethnicity, gender, and economic background.'" Bullshit. We need to put students in the classes they NEED, and require mastery before promoting them to the NEXT class they need.
USA's public-education 'learning products' are inferior. Run by accountants with spreadsheets and SJWs with oppression hierarchies tattooed on their foreheads, instead of the teachers and students.
You want boys to start excelling in STEM, like they used to? Give them an online learning management system (LMS, like Pearson MyLab and Mastering or Cengage WebAssign), and cut off their video games until they get their homework done! The cool thing is that it would motivate those boys to get it done, AND it would present the knowledge they NEED, exactly when they need it, i.e., instant, on-demand help. Instead, they're trying to perfect an outmoded content-delivery system, devised for a time where there might be only ONE person in the WHOLE TOWN who actually owns a book! Now, EVERYbody has the INTERNET!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I can see how it looks bad on video and how the cops would frown on it, but out there in the street, with a large crowd that's only going to grow, with you standing there and 3 insane women who just got knocked on their asses... Hanging around can get you killed. I totally don't blame him for scootin'. I know how those situations can get out of hand and end VERY badly for a big, strong guy, who knows he's within his rights, and does the right thing, only to be pummeled by the crowd that's just gonna grow, and likely be very hostile to the man in the situation.
And he turned himself in, right away, pretty much, didn't he? It's news because we're starting to see more and more of these toxic women, who think they can talk shit, get up in your face, and hit you or spit on you, without consequences, because they have a Woman Card. People need to be reminded that it's a LADY'S Card, and you only see gentlemen when there are Ladies about. Then the power of the feminine is absolute. But when you go masculine, you're sayin' Tits Don't Matter, and you take what you get AFAIC.
1
-
I'm torn on AOC, because her ignorance is something of a shield against the Swamp. She was OFFENDED by the fact that "Freshman Congress Orientation" was wall-to-wall lobbyists. She doesn't know how that game is played, which is ignorant, but the game, itself, is crooked as hell, and she was right to call them out.
Ilhan Omar got it all wrong on the facts as to when CAIR was created (She said after 9/11, when it was created in 1994). But she NAILED it when she called out the Patriot Act for its police-state features, which you just don't hear "old hands" in Congress talking about.
As more or less of a crusty old bastard, who believes in old-fashioned tolerance and basic individual rights, I'm pretty eclectic about things. When these clowns get something right, I try to see past my apparent tribe and not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Sometimes it's the Republicans acting all tribal and regressive. More often, of late, it's been the Democrats, and the degree to which they've regressed is far beyond anything the Republicans appear to be doing.
Most of the things I disagree with are the things there's bipartisan support for. The Republicans LOVE Free Stuff just as much as Democrats, these days. The Democrats like the arms industry as much as any war-hawk Republican.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1