Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
1
-
There is no doubt and has BEEN no doubt about this weaponization, since Obama went after journalists who were critical of his actions, long before Trump was ever elected.
Democrats are trying to run out the clock on their crimes, hoping and expecting to be ABOVE any criminal sanctions by holding absolute power in a few years. We're already close, with every agency and government-funded institution taken over by Democrats, and interested only in perpetuating their no-consequences gravy train that is robbing and extorting hard working Americans, for the benefit of the very poor and the very rich. That's where we're headed. A nation of poor and super-rich with NOTHING in-between, except for government and government-sponsored apparatchiks, which these Marxists will tolerate, because they need to administer the police state to come, that some would argue is already upon us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leanne5067 That's right. After Hillary skated on the private server, destroyed thousands of subpoenaed e-mails, and approved the sell-off of 20% of our uranium to the Russians, because the DOJ considers her above the law, you should doubt the government. When the same DOJ pursued RussiaGate for 3 years, when it was debunked by FBI and DOJ in 2016, you should doubt the government. When Adam Schiff makes shit up and gets away with it, but his lies are believed so completely that they try to impeach the president over his false allegations, you should doubt the government. When the lab-leak hypothesis is censored for over a year by the same government that funded gain-of-function in Wuhan, you should doubt your government.
Gulf of Tonkin, WMDs, Bret Kavanaugh's a serial rapist, Covington kids are white supremacists, protests in Portland are "mostly peaceful," the word "is" means whatever Bill Clinton decides it means, Manhattan will be underwater by the year 2003 due to global warming.... (Meanwhile, the fear mongers are buying-up beachfront property). No. Our government wouldn't lie to us.
1
-
1
-
@tiguy6298 Shall I bring up anecdotes of conspicuously vaccinated who died either from the jab or from COVID? It's pointless. What you can't get through your head is the COVID-19 was not that serious in over 99% of cases, and was very treatable, if caught early, in all of those cases. The panic and hysteria have gotten in the way of effective treatments being made widely available, because all the MEDIA were pushing were masks, lockdowns and vaccines. No concern for the harm those strategies caused is shown by any of the "You must take the jab, mask up and lock down" crowd.
Life is trade-offs. There are some trade-offs the vast majority are not able or willing to make indefinitely just to please the hysterical few. The free money's gonna run out. It's gonna be dog eat dog, and when that happens, the LAST thing anybody's going to be worried about is whether you've got a mask on, are social distancing, or have lots of likes for your braindead tweets.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@THYCR3AT0R For all the criticisms of American capitalism, most of the problems with our health care system are caused by government, not solved by government.
You probably think evil insurance companies are at the heart of it, I'm guessing.
Do you know where health insurance came from? It came during the Roosevelt administration, when he imposed wage freezes like the good fascist he was, during the Great Depression. Health care benefits were a loophole big corporations could exploit to circumvent the wage freezes, thereby giving big corporations a nice, government-created competitive advantage in the labor market.
Insurance companies came along after that. Before that, nobody dreamed of there being such a thing as health insurance. You just did the best you and your community could do, and there was a lot more community spirit back then, because people knew that they needed to look out for one another. You can't insure your health. Not really. For an insurance system to work like it does on cars, homes and such, there's a ceiling. You can "total" a car. You can consider a house a "total loss." But you can't put a dollar figure on the value of a human life. This health insurance made it possible, then, for bureaucrats to come in and decide what your life was worth.
Med-4-All puts bureaucrats in charge of what, when, how much, and who gets health care, and believe me, the bureaucrats and politicians will make sure THEY are at the front of the line, and you and I will get what's left over. Do you know how long you have to wait for cardio, cancer, hip-replacement and many other surgeries in Canada or the UK? Do you know how many people come to the USA to receive cancer treatments that are unavailable in those countries, because their health-care mafia deem them improper?
But we're not that far away from what's going on under socialized medicine in other countries. Do you realize how many extra paper-pushers a doctor has to hire just to fill out insurance and government paperwork? I think the doctors themselves spend something like 1/3 or their work day filling out forms rather than treating patients. Government involvement in the health care industry is far from a panacea. In fact, it results in drugs being MORE expensive than they have to be, because there's no profit in drugs after the patent expires. Why give you something off the shelf, when they can charge you up the ass for something new? They SAY it's "better" but is it really?
Then there's the matter of pricing. As the single biggest consumer of health care (Medicare, Medicaid, etc.), the government decides what it will pay for a treatment, whether it meets the cost or not. So who makes up the difference? The taxpayer who not only has to pay for Medicare and Medicaid, but also has to pay inflated insurance rates because hospitals charge the insured WAY more than they charge the government.
Economics always has the final say and when you promise everything to everyone and you run out of resources, you cut corners and the quality of care goes down. But hey. Everybody's treated exactly the same, so it's fair, right? No. The rich people still get whatever they require. It's the blokes in the middle who WORK for a living who end up getting hurt. The first law of economics is that resources are not infinite. The first law of politics is to ignore the 1st law of economics. We'll just SAY we're handling everything and everyone will shut up, apparently.
That, by the way, is why you wait for so long in UK and Canada for many treatments. Sometimes you die before you've ever been to a doctor. This is the same for ANYthing the government guarantees. It seems good for a while, but reality always has the final word. This is why people waited in bread lines in the Soviet Union. Adolf Hitler made bread his #1 priority "for the people." Bread shortages instantly became chronic throughout the tenure of the 3rd Reich. If you want to destroy a product or service, just nationalize/collectivize it.
What a long rant. Just sick and tired of economically illiterate socialists, who know nothing of the real world, insisting they know more than everybody else because they're "educated."' But as the saying goes, "Garbage in. Garbage out."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1