Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Louis Rossmann"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I was pretty happy with Acrobat Pro V9. Then they took away features I depended on, without warning. Why should I have to drop everything at work and spend HOURS re-training on software I already know, quite intimately?
It's theft, and all these companies "updating" things that don't need updating deserve to go broke. If I were 20 years younger, I would learn everything I could about LINUX OS for my PCs. I'm close to retirement, and it's just easier to go with what my institution provides, and coast to the finish line, but it's infuriating to have someone reach into my tool belt, steal my best hammer, replace with a meat tenderizer, and have the gall to say "You're welcome!"
I hope you young people stand against these "You will own nothing and be happy" criminals. Learn all you can about open source software. Software should be inexpensive and robust. What we have is expensive and unstable.
They know how to do this right. They don't want to, because it's less profitable for them to treat their customers right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fixing the equipment is a big part of why my brother-in-law rents out his land, rather than farming it, himself. He got out before things got too crazy.
I personally think that between the government and the equipment manufacturers, we've strayed away from cars, trucks and tractors that last a long time and are straightforward to repair. It takes more and more specialized training (and re-training) to be certified to work on vehicles these days. All we think about is the fuel efficiency and always reducing the emissions, with no thought for the emissions created building entirely new vehicles, because the previous vehicles are designed to break down in 10 years or less. I'd be perfectly happy with my '93 pickup for life, if I could keep finding parts for it. Even a super-expensive repair is cheaper than buying one brand-new, and think of all the mining, refining and sheer energy that goes into building a new one.
Same for phones and other electronic devices. I get that things keep getting faster, but if you're happy with the functionality of your Galaxy S3, you should be able to fix it and use it essentially forever. But that's not what these people - who all insist I'm polluting too much - want. They want to sell me a new one after a year. 3 years at most.
1
-
1
-
I've been using Amazon as a catalog to find better companies with better independent reviews. Then I go direct to the manufacturer with the best reputation. Almost all of them will ship direct to the customer. I did it because years ago, with their treatment of their own workers and politicization (Denying AW$ services to a platform they deemed politically incorrect). I also had my own mini-boycott against Chinese goods, because of how they treat their people and their predatory trade practices. I think countries like that should face steep tariffs, to offset their underhandedness and oppression at home. No embargoes. Just a middle path that increases the cost of being authoritarian cheats.
As time has gone on, it's gotten harder and harder to tell just from the Amazon site where something is made, and the more they hide it, the more sure I am that it's from China, where, on top of everything else, I have no confidence as to the materials used or the quality of construction, expecting it to fall apart or wear out really fast.
Amazon was a great idea and revolutionized commerce, but when it could be generous and open, it chose to be tight-fisted and opaque. It won't be going any where any time soon, but it'll do without most of my business.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Their problem is they support the Democrat establishment, which is causing inflation, which has resulted in the prime rate jumping from near 0% to 8.25%. I'm not sure what the Fed rate is... checking... 5% to 5.25%. That's what they're charging banks. The banks are charging 8.25% to their biggest corporate customers.
That's why Google's looking for pennies in the sofa. Their early success and continued operation depended on almost-free credit, to keep the ball rolling and hoping that the money eventually starts rolling in. I know my institution uses Google, much the same way my and other institutions used Microsoft. They basically undercut everyone with virtually cost-free software suites, to dominate the market, which they now do, but their margins are tiny, and they really aren't improving their product. Microsoft eventually had to give way to open-source operating systems in the commercial and big-institution sector, because the open source kept evolving and had more capability with fewer security holes. LINUX is more stable than Windows NT, which I think reached its peak in the late '90s and early 2000s, but nobody's running NT that I know of.
Something similar will probably happen to Google, although ed. institutions will be slow to respond, at first. Right now, it's all the rage, though. I just think that when the venture capital dries up, Google/Alphabet is going to hit a wall, economically, and eventually fall behind, technologically, partly because it weeds out all the non-woke in its ranks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The latest (and last) Mac I bought has never been updated. Never had problems, other than that it asks me to update every single fuckin' day. It's worked better, with fewer issues than the previous one that I dutifully updated.
About 4 or 5 years ago, I noticed that software "updates" usually meant the software worked less well, deprived me of more and more keyboard shortcuts, and generally made me less efficient at work. They're building this stuff, now, for people who use smartphones, not for professionals who use computers. Adobe is the absolute worst in this regard. Acrobat Pro was a real mainstay for me, until the mandatory upgrade to Pro DC, which is almost useless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1