Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Alex Jones u0026 Nick Fuentes DEBATE Hitler" video.

@jakegetrost4690 Alex Jones is pretty solid on fundamental liberal principles of liberty and limited government. But he has 3 hours to fill, so he resorts to hyperbole and theatrics. I think he's pretty solid when he's laying out those Enlightenment principles, but then he gets "wound up" to keep people's interest. His favorite tactic is to start out with "We're not sure this is true, but if it is, ...." Then he starts down the road of "If it is true..." and 10 minutes later, he's breathing fire and acting like it IS true. Big turn-off. Kind of like all the guys in politics and sports who appeal to a segment of the population of love drama. I hate drama. I love truth.
1
@ChicagoMike85 Ben Shapiro only debates lightweights and college kids, who don't know anything except what their historically illiterate professors tell them.
1
C'mon, guys. Jones said Hitler was just like Stalin or Mao. He started right in with the 1st and 2nd Amendments, which are the 1st and 2nd things all would-be dictators eliminate.
1
Hitler was a socialist whom socialists are determined to cast as a right-winger. He was - in today's terminology - a far-leftist. I disagree with modern terminology, because I feel that socialism is just feudalism with a facelift. Very regressive. Trying to drag us back to the day when every benefit accrued by the masses was just the crumbs off the table of the lords and ladies who owned all the land the serfs lived on and worked. We changed the labels. Now they're not lords and ladies. We call them "civil servants." But it's the same thing. They even tell us "You will own nothing and be happy." That's EXACTLY what a robber baron would tell the serfs working his land! "See all the great things I DO for you (when I feel like it and it doesn't cost me too much)." Well, maybe I want to do those things for mySELF, with my OWN money, and I know I'll do it a lot better than you will! I know I'll look for the best product at the cheapest price, and the people providing the service will work for ME and not the local lord or lady. And look at how those bureaucrats pose and parade themselves around, as if they're saving everybody with the money they TOOK from everybody. I could do a lot more saving of myself if I just got to keep the money I worked for, but that's a separate rant. The point is, they're nothing more or less than a new, emerging aristocracy. Same condescending attitude towards their clients. Same pearl-clutching theatrics when actually confronted by the "unwashed masses," when they'd much rather be drinking champagne with their fellow lords and ladies somewhere we commoners will never be represented.
1