Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Eric Bolling: Not a lot of pro-Trump people at Fox News" video.

  1. Wow, Matthew Shane. You put any faith or trust in CNN/MSNBC? You set them above FOX? Just wow.
    3
  2. I thought somebody had farted, but it was just Matthew Shane gaslighting us.
    3
  3. shoenlad one: If you don't see CNN as leftie-corporate propaganda, then you're not doing enough of your own research. That's probably why you defend CNN, because they're also too good and too smart to confirm stories and check facts, let alone keep track of the number of stories they just flat-out get wrong. Hidden-mic confessions of CNN higher-ups proves that they KNOW they're peddling lies, but are doubling-down, in spite of it. No integrity. Zero. Zilch.
    3
  4. FOX definitely has their agenda, too, but they're up front about it and they are the ONLY major network that's not a front organization for the Establishment Left.
    3
  5. Yup. And there's a populist nationalism sweeping Europe in reaction to the exact same bullshit being pushed by establishment shills in American mainstream media. The regressive left has been calling the shots for too long, here and across the pond. Dude is on the wrong side of history.
    2
  6. Matthew Shane: I think your vagina hat just slipped over your eyes. Explains a lot.
    2
  7. Yes, James. Matthew Shane is still butt-hurt about losing and lying to himself about the real world. But he'll NEVER question the propaganda that gets proven wrong, over and over, again. Like the rest of neolibtards, he's doubling down. People with more open minds, who can think for themselves, are red-pilling off the plantation. It's harder to convince someone they've been fooled than it is to fool them in the first place.
    2
  8. He has a little more credibility than someone who would spin a yarn, but it comes across like he sent some baaaaaaaad e-mails, when he doesn't fire right back with the truth of it: "I did a baaaaad thing" or "I did no such thing." Instead, he wheedles. Makes his "Trump needs Trump guys," which was suspect out of the gate, look totally self-serving. I generally don't like guys auditioning for top jobs on mainstream media. I feel the same way about seeing Digenova appear on FOX right before his hiring, and take all the correct (Trumpster) partisan stances. But it takes all kinds, and Digenova doesn't mince words. Can't tell for sure how much he's posturing for advancement (which he certainly obtained), or speaking in his authentic voice. I disagree with Colling, totally on Trump needing or not needing Trumpsters in his cabinet. I think Trump gets more sympathy from most folks for the leaks, and it plays in his favor. If he really were this evil genius everybody's putting out there, he would've clamped down on leaks like a vise. Instead, he welcomes people who DISagree with him, and allows a certain level of unruliness, which I think is smart, even though it offends aristocrats in the Beltway. I respect the economic advisor resigning over tariffs. And Trump probably does, too. It was clear Cohen wasn't a rubber-stamp, and that's a good thing to see. Stuck to his principles and resigned. Beats the hell out of a yes-man who thwarts you behind the scenes, or worse, feeds the worst of your tendencies. It's a position Trump took in which government is very much intervening in a nationalistic way to preserve a strategic industry. Yeah, it's fascist. But we're in an environment full of fascist competitors, giving their strategic industries an unfair competitive advantage over our own. That's not a violation of Adam Smith. It's an act of self-defense against fascism, abroad. The savings our consumers realize for steel and aluminum products by buying Chinese dumpings at a net loss to their economy, but by putting our guys out of business, they can corner the market. We can't have that, because China might not always be Mr. Nice Guy.
    1
  9. That last ain't quite a sentence. Sorry.
    1