Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Stelter: Fox News wants to make Fauci Public Enemy No. 1" video.

  1. Fauci's NIAID funded gain-of-function research in the Wuhan lab. Wuhan lab is the epicenter of the outbreak. Connecting the dots is too much to ask of CNN. So is listening to Dr. Baric, who worked closely with Dr. Zhi, who's gone on the record saying "This looks like how we engineer viruses in gain-of-function research." He did everything he could to dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis, while covering-up his agency's funding of Wuhan lab. You say there's room for debate, here, and there should be good-faith conversations that include the lab-leak hypothesis. People have been saying this for over a year, and it is outlets like CNN who claimed it was debunked on the word of the very person, Peter Daszak, who was the money conduit to Wuhan lab for gain-of-function research! Follow the money, as they say. The outlines of this have been very clear for over a year, but you wouldn't know that if you depended on the "Most trusted source in news." gag People: You really need to get out more. CNN making a straw man out of Sean Hannity, who's a joke, is like Sean Hannity making a straw man out out of Brian Stelter, who is also a joke. Hannity get the facts right more often, but he's impossible to sit through, as is Brian Stelter. They're both highly partisan and cherry-pick their facts to fit the narrative. They make artificial distinctions between each other. He calls CNN far left. CNN calls Hannity far right. But the fact is they're BOTH creatures of the corporations. Neither of them will ever really cross their corporate advertisers. This is some of the most dishonest or just plain stupid discussion I've heard since the last time I held my nose to listen to Stelter feed me the Democrat National Committee's narrative. WHO can't be trusted. China can't be trusted. Neither can any of the "traditional" legacy media, who've been lying to us since FDR was president, and probably before. But FDR pretty much marks the beginning of radio/television mass media, and the illusion of objectivity. The big networks have NEVER crossed a sitting administration's desire to go to war or grow government power, except for Vietnam. And that Vietnam generation, that staged mass protests FOR free speech, now seeks to CENSOR speech, now that they've become the establishment. But that's another subject. CNN is just one more cog in the manufacture-of-consent machine that's led the American people by the nose for decades. The mask finally slipped when Obama abolished the Fairness Doctrine, and networks were no longer obliged to even PRETEND to be objective. Ironically, I think that's as it should be. I think Obama just did the math (over 90% Democrats running the big networks), and said "We don't need to hear the other side." But I think it's boomeranged. I think the propaganda was much stronger when they pretended to be objective, but cherry picked and slanted the news in much more subtle ways. Before Obama, the editors did it all in the story selection. But now, we have active censorship taking place. it's not technically "government censorship." It's more a matter of a government official calling FaceBook and saying "This story is false and I want it taken down." FaceBook is only too happy to oblige. New revelations about Hunter Biden's laptop. Not a word in "mainstream media," except for maybe FOX. But it's on blackout on all the other networks. When the hounds were getting close to Hunter's pay-for-play in Ukraine, that's when they went after Trump for supposed "quid-pro-quo" over a phone call where he said nothing wrong. But you wouldn't know about that if all you watched was CNN.
    1