Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "PowerfulJRE" channel.

  1. 1100
  2. 618
  3. 90
  4. 73
  5. 59
  6. 34
  7. 24
  8. 22
  9. 20
  10. 19
  11. 18
  12. 16
  13. 15
  14. 14
  15. 13
  16.  @gerk7238  The scientific method is a method of multiple working hypotheses. You don't rule anything out, and you lean towards the theory that fits the facts in the most simple way (Occam's Razor - the simpler explanation is preferred/more likely). Wuhan Lab was at the epicenter. They were doing research on this precise strain of bat virus. Early on, we heard of scientists being sent home with corona-like symptoms in November 2019. The prima facie evidence is that it most likely got loose out of the lab, and that theory should've stood as at LEAST as probable as other theories, and more investigation needed to be done. What happened, instead, was the guy who SENT THE MONEY OVER TO WUHAN, Peter Daszak, was the guy whose word everybody took, without fact-checking - indeed, FaceBook made him their head fact-checker! And you know how THEY knew he had no conflict of interest? His word that he had no conflict of interest. And if you have no sense that theories embarrassing to China and Fauci's Funders were ruthlessly and arbitrarily suppressed as "debunked" without ANY real investigative reporting being done, then you haven't been paying attention. The fact that they got it all wrong can NOT be called "an honest mistake." It was pure censorship, implemented by the very person who was likely complicit in the creation of the virus. What YOU do is take the word of ONE GUY you decide to make the arbiter of truth, and then think it's OK to silence all competing theories. That's authoritarian bullshit. That's not how we produce knowledge in the West. That's now how we judge truth in the West. We spent millennia refining how we measure truth and reason to a better understanding of the world around us. Science. You know? All that stuff that made this conversation in the comments section possible? Nope. Once they make it political, nobody cares about truth any more, because to them, the truth is already absolutely known. You make a big show of "following the facts and evidence," but it is clear by the abject FAILURES that our leaders were not following facts and evidence, and many of the measures imposed did more harm than good.
    10
  17. 10
  18. 9
  19. 9
  20. 8
  21. 8
  22. 8
  23. 8
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 6
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. There's always a tension between the collective and the individual. Pakman fosters the illusion that all we need is a sufficiently competent, ethical, and enlightened leadership telling the collective what to do and allocate resources on the collective's behalf, for the benefit of all individuals. The trouble is, you rarely get competent, ethical and enlightened leadership. And it's always the duds who want the most control, just the like the worst driver in the room wants to show you how good their reflexes are out on the road. See? We're DRAFTING! Great fuel efficiency! *CRASH*. Everything would've been fine if that asshole in front of me hadn't slammed the brakes. It's that other guy's fault. Pakman's totally shilling for Democrats. So Trump's not a great speaker. He gets his point across. And if you watch him fence with hostile reporters (like Obama never did) off the cuff, he comes off better, thinking on his feet than any of the Democrat candidates. And no, you're not going to explain away how out of it Joe Biden is by micro-analyzing Trump's body language. I'm about 30 minutes in, and all I'm hearing are Democrat talking points. Give it up. Join Jimmy Dore, who's at least honest about what he sees in a very common-sensical way. He's a hopeless lefty, but he's not makin' shit up to fit his narrative. And I bet he can find 100s of Democrat 'experts' who'll spin you all the things that are wrong with Trump. Use your eyes and your brain and not your hopes and wishes, dude.
    3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. I'd take the temperature of the comments, just to see who I was appealing to and what it brought out in them. But I think beyond a certain point, you're going to have a pretty good idea of the kinds of criticisms you're going to get, and know your own faults more acutely than any of your critics. This makes me think about student evaluations of teachers at the end of every semester. After 30 years, you know what your strengths and weaknesses are. You can be fooled into thinking something's really working great, even when it isn't, because 5 people sing your praises. You can think something sucks, when it doesn't, because lazy students don't understand how many reps it takes for them to master a skill, or they'll tell you that they're fine with the homework, but the test questions are just too hard, even when you went out of your way to just tweak the numbers on homework exercises on the tests. Administrators try to emphasize student evaluations, but other than the most egregious cases of bad teaching that TERRIBLE evaluations can flag for you, they really don't help you improve your teaching craft. I know - as a hoary old goat of a teacher - exactly how to play the students if I want great evaluations, just by planting suggestions and creating an atmosphere of "You're doing great!" even when they're not. I don't have it in me to lie to them. I just act kindly towards all and give them what they earn. It's important to never take anything away from anybody. Just award them the points they EARN, like it's a job. If I were Joe Rogan, with a nice income, I'd probably hire somebody I trusted to monitor the comments and create an irreverent, but welcoming place. It's not that hard to do, and it's as easy or easier to ban bad actors (like the guy who sees Zionist conspiracies everywhere, and quotes Revelation all the time) as it is for the trolls to come up with new identities. Just one person could probably monitor 3 or 4 pretty beefy channels for a uniquely open and troll-free experience.
    2
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. Making you wait 2 or 3 days to see your doctor when you're coming down with something is how you get REALLY sick, if you're GONNA get really sick. The medical "authorities" got this wrong in every conceivable way. I've had a lot of injuries over the years and always tried to be a good patient. My last stay at ONE hospital, I actually started fearing for my life. Weird things kept happening. I'd wake up sweating and it was almost 80 degrees in there. I'd ask them to turn it down to about 68. I'd wake up chilled, and it was set at 60. This happened several times. It was like "Am I crazy?" Then I got to thinking they were gaslighting me and enjoying my misery. I finally found one RN and one LPN who seemed pretty forthright. Family finally flew in a few days in, and things improved, remarkably. To this day, I'm not sure I'd've made it out of there without family there by my side. Even getting OUT of there was a nightmare. I needed a wheelchair-accessible van, because BOTH legs were busted. (Don't ask.). I asked them to arrange it. I sat out in the freezing cold in front of the hospital for a half hour before the taxi - a SEDAN - pulled up. I had NO way of getting in and out of that sedan. The RN I mentioned saw me waiting INside, asking for help, and she kicked some asses. Sent me back to my room to wait. Finally got a wheelchair-accessible bus ride home. I don't know what I said or what I did to those people, or if they just look for vulnerable people to fuck with. I tell everyone I know not to go to that hospital.
    1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. Evolution doesn't explain how we made the leap from organic soup to 1-celled to multi-celled to EVERYTHING. Missing links ABOUND in the fossil record. We're not really sure how those major leaps happen, although the fossil record indicates many major leaps. Variation of species doesn't quite cover it. You don't have to be a wacked-out "Earth is 4,000 years old" fanatic to believe that there are huge gaps in the theory of evolution. Look at trilobites. They lasted millions of years, essentially unchanged. Then they're ALL gone. And something else entirely filled up its niche(s). Paleontologists have no idea how things transitioned. They see the one thing. Then they see the totally different thing. I think evolution fits the facts, but doesn't explain all the facts. Most of all, I think we're just damn short on facts. ------ There's a deeply imbedded paradox in contemporary liberal thought. People want to be free, but they also want government to take responsibility for damn near everything. When you give up personal responsibility for a thing, you give up personal authority over that thing. You also agree to abide by the rules set by those to whom you foolishly gave the responsibility. You can't at the same time be free and secure. Liberals want to be secure, but they're always surprised when they realize that it always comes at cost to their liberty. Christian fundamentalism isn't the ONLY traditional dogma that gets in the way of real human progress. Throw God out and somebody else - lately somebody POLITICAL - will eagerly supply you with a world view with its OWN dogmas. Things like Med4All sound really good, but when you make the collective responsible for the cost of your health care, every cigarette you smoke, every donut you eat, every risky behavior in which you engage is at the collective's expense. One economic downturn, cigs are illegal. One bad year, people start REALLY fat-shaming, VICIOUSLY, because that person's self -indulgence is at EVERYBODY'S expense. Very slippery slope, as nice as collective responsibility for the weak and powerless. The answer? A self-sufficient citizen with a little extra to give, who GIVES, because it's RIGHT, and society affirms their generosity with STATUS. ---- This guest sounds like he's getting close to what Adam Smith was saying, but still operates under some myths about "toxic capitalism." When exchanges are voluntary between known individuals in a community, in full light of day, cheating is extremely rare. Word gets out. You need that person's business in the future. Businesses that last, under NO rules beyond basic protection of rights to person and property, are as moral or MORE moral than highly-regulated markets. Only in a highly-regulated market do you see GMO products from big corporations get labeled as "organic" on the shelf. Only with the USDA weighing in does the actual organic farmer get labeled non-organic, because of how they filled out a form. Those rules are written by elites for elites. Written by big business for big business. ------- I've been in rock fights. They're terrifying enough! Especially around the railroad tracks where there's an infinite supply of fist-sized rocks perfect for throwing. Bezing SHOT AT is a whole 'nother level of fear. ---------- Let's make peace between law enforcement and the community. Let's start by thinking about policies that put them at odds in the first place. I'd start with re-thinking our approach to drug addiction. Maybe more of a public-health approach than a law-enforcement approach. Cops already see us at our worst. Honest cops get a low opinion of the community. Dishonest cops have all kinds of drug money in front of them every day. Temptation. Some cops shouldn't be cops. An old security guard at my college in the 1980s was your stereotypical Irish ex-cop. He could tell some stories. One he told (grain of salt) was that when he worked for a big-city police department, he got shipped into corrections almost instantly, because he wouldn't take the envelope. So his fellow cops wouldn't trust him on the street. (And he couldn't trust his fellow officers). He said that he ended up being a jailer because he wouldn't take money. I think the War on Drugs really fuels this kind of thing. Gambling and prostitution are also corruptors of communities and police forces when they're illegal. Legalize and regulate gambling and prostitution, as well. Law enforcement would then only be there to regulate street traffic and investigate and help prevent crimes against persons and property. I don't care if somebody wants to stick a needle in his own arm. Not the cop's business, until and unless he knocks somebody over the head for money for his next fix. THEN he's meat for law enforcement.
    1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. I think the levee's gonna break, and there'll be an upstart platform get traction against YouTube. YouTube's censorship/curatorship is eventually going to spell its doom. They can't stop everybody from building platforms with as good or better look and feel. But the companies like Bit-Chute need to build better/slicker platforms. It defies belief that there aren't superior-to-YouTube asynchronous chat clients for the comments sections. Tom's right about the need to create a proper environment. But his MISTAKE is trying to do it all, himself. Instead, reach out to your regular commenters and train them to monetize their time online making money doing what they enjoy. Train a strong cadré of "hall monitors" who understand the essence of what you're doing. You can get pretty smart people who are THRILLED to make $20/hour doing really good work for you. Think about how much money you have. You can afford to pay a couple helpers. Lots of commenters will curate your comments for you for next to nothing, just feel really good about the extra status they have, and the power to block trolls from the comments. Build a community with intense personal effort, but make sure that the effort is aimed at eliminating YOUR effort. The way the Thorman brothers built up Arrowheadpride.com under the sbnation.com umbrella is a case in point. I think Joel and Cris are way up the administrative ladder, now, making good money. As an individual content creator, you would just stay in your creative space, with motivated, well-paid helpers. Trouble is that most content-creators don't want to mess with managing people. Hmmm. Maybe there's a niche for outfits that'll police your content the way you want it policed, by people who get you, for pretty low fees.
    1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. Good, knowledgeable conversation, so far @ 10:38. To me, anybody using a product for free has no expectation of quality. You want better content? Pay for what you want. I just took a big step, today, and cut every nickel out of cable t.v. offerings. Joe's spot on with the observation that since advertisers are paying for ALL of the free stuff, you're going to get corporate media, which, regardless of its good or bad intentions, is always going to pander to the complainers who are the biggest threat to their income streams, and the loudest complainers are the authoritarian, so-called liberal types. A conservative is USED to the public square despising their positions, so they just shrug and move on. internet's only been with our species for a very short time. We're adapting to it as we speak. Most of what government has done, beyond building the basic backbone, has been pretty toxic. People should have total customization of their own experience, and not through the platform's curation. The platform should just give the customer the most options. if you think a person's comments are toxic, you should be able to remove them from your individualized experience. No fuss. No muss. The other person needn't be notified, in fact, should NOT be notified. The troll should not be able to use notifications to set the hook in their next victim. I think that's the perfect way for society to deal with trolls. Just learn to turn that voice off, for yourself. Then the crazy people (Maybe I'm one of them) is shouting at the top of their lungs, and are totally frozen out of the conversation because nobody in the room hears them. I don't think a 12-year-old should have the right to hijack adult conversations. Maybe I'm in a TOYO site, and we're talking about making room for a 3.4 liter in a '93 Toyota pickup that comes with a 3.0 liter, stock. When the 12-year old says "You slept with your sister" you should have a turn-this-off switch that requires no mediation by the platform. A well-run platform should have that option. YouTube does not. YouTube allows you to report someone but not to take agency in a totally nonviolent way and use software a 10-year-old could write to have an "off" switch for people who are rude. Or maybe the kid just interrupts with something else that's not rude, but more a 1 + 1 = 2 question in the middle of Calculus Ii. You can calmly ignore someone, without any hard feelings in an online setting. We really - I really - need to grow up and migrate off the corporate/government platforms.
    1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. Yes. 99% of the erosion in the American Southwest desert is ALSO from rain (water erosion), despite its usually arid conditions. This guy says that the Sphinx must be over 10,000 years old because there hasn't been rain in Egypt for thousands of years. That's bullshit. It rains there. In fact, it SNOWED there very recently. It was a freak snow, but it did snow. When it doesn't rain very often, and there's no vegetation mantling that limestone, the rate of erosion from a single rain event is very very high. Ask anybody who's been caught in a gully during a cloudburst in Arizona (a very stupid place to be, btw). This guy's really smart, but he either mis-spoke or he's talking half out of his ass. Yes, a sandstorm can quickly erode your face, if you're out in it, but even in desert, it's WATER that does most of the work eroding outcrops. It's why limestone is a cliff-former in deserts. Cap it with some nice sandstone (that erodes, but isn't generally water-soluble), and it'll give you wondrous structures like the Grand Canyon. This doesn't disprove his hypothesis that archaeologists don't have their shit together. Just listen to them arguing with each other about calculated dates in the Bible, or putting dates on a Clovis point (flint arrowheads/spearpoints) in North America. The one thing he DOES get right is the paucity of evidence and the surplus of opinion on these matters. It turns out that a lot of the dates archaeology establishment has accepted for decades (that supposedly disprove the Bible) were wrong, and calculations from solid scholars and unbiased archaeologists are starting to align quite nicely with Biblical writings. I think the Bible and other ancient (sacred) texts DO chronicle some major catastrophes that actually took place. Velikovsky (if he were alive) would tell you that the planets in our solar system have done a bit of wandering in (poorly) recorded (by Bronze-Age primitives) history, especially in the histories that were handed down orally over the generations BEFORE the written word. He claims that Venus and Mars both had near misses with Earth after themselves being knocked out of orbit by meteor strikes, and that mythology records these events. No wonder Mars and Venus are part of Greek/Roman pantheon. I don't believe everything he said, but his alternate history of Earth squares very nicely with the Bible and other ancient texts, and archaeologists are starting to crank out results that are more in line with Biblical claims than they were 30 or 40 years ago. Don't get me wrong. I'm not gonna sit here and tell you the world is 4,000 years old, because it says so in the Bible. That's easily disproved by the mile-deep sediments in the Grand Canyon, which were deposited slowly, over millions of years, under processes we understand very well, occurring in real-time as we speak. You don't get perfectly graded (grains of same size) 1-inch-high foreset beds and tiny ripple marks from rock that was laid down in one cataclysm. If it were all laid down at once, the sediments would be un-graded, which is to say that big chunks and little chunks would be buried simultaneously, and you'd get flood structures which are in evidence all over the world, in spots, but no way in hell did they form miles of perfectly graded and uniformly bedded sandstones that cover 100s or even 1000s of square miles. Also, either one of those two guys in the video could break me in half by accident.
    1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. Yes. You're never voting for the president. You're voting for the president's team. No president can get into the weeds of everything the federal government does. He has to delegate authority and trust his top people. This was one of the ways Trump went wrong in his 1st go-round. He trusted people he shouldn't have trusted. Treasury Dept looks like it could be a problem. As far as "trash (crypto) coins" are concerned, they're no worse than the fiat currency issued by the federal government. One of the biggest factors in a sound currency or coinage is the faith the people have in its value. Inflation, bad as it is, routinely lags behind the actual value of the dollar, because it takes time for everyday people to realize. It takes time for inflationary policies to catch up to actual inflation on the street. Fiat currency is very much like the fable of Stone Soup, which probably pre-dates the Biblical tale of the "Loaves and the fish," wherein Jesus supposedly turned 3 loaves and 2 fish into a meal for a multitude. I think they're saying something about the faith of the people in a thing. If everybody BELIEVES there's really something to that pot of boiling water the grifter just threw a rock into and started smacking his lips over, then everybody wants a taste. If the cost of a taste is their participation - a carrot from one guy, a potato from another guy, and so on - then in the end, you get a great big pot of tasty stew! Their BELIEF made it so. In my opinion, that's what the loaves and the fishes was. People were hungry, but everybody shared some of what they had, and the result was everybody getting fed. This phenomenon has propped up Keynesian economics for close to a century. Just pump money into the economy and good things seem to happen. But I don't believe it for a minute. Eventually, the overabundance of money makes a guy charge more - because he CAN - and everybody else joins in, and a loaf of bread goes from a nickel to a dollar to 2 dollars, and so on. Who really benefits from this? Rich people who can inflation-proof their assets and the government that wants to do all manner of things without the actual means to do any of those things. Who suffers? People who live their lives morally and prudently, by working hard and saving money. Who suffers the most? Old people whose live savings and preparations for their retirement go up in smoke, unless they're rich enough to invest in things that keep up with or out-pace inflation.
    1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. We still haven't gotten to first causes with the evidence of our senses. But we see all around us other life forms and we recognize survival traits that are passed on to future generations because they WORK. We recognize intelligence as a survival trait, which, more or less made self-aware beings such as ourselves not only possible, but inevitable. Within the great chaos that is the Big Is, order happens virtually inevitably. Order that replicates itself will tend to replicate itself. Throw in a dash of time stretching out over billions and trillions of years, and once the ball gets rolling, greater and more complex orderings arise that perpetuate THEMselves, until US. That's as far as we can take it, because we are what we are. Old age and decrepitude seem like a curse, but they are essential. Immortals can't change. Mortals ate all the immortals, because after many generations, small or large improvements to the original design that persist, because they WORK will either survive changes in the environment that the immortals can't, or even just by getting bigger/stronger/smarter, the mortals eventually add slower/smaller/dumber immortals to their diet. Anyway, from what I understand about Natural Law, everything around us, including us, is pretty explainable all the way back to Creation. But even the eggheads who understand the Big Bang can't tell you WHY there was a Big Bang. "Let there be light" is the most profound statement of all time. No one knows why there's light, but everything in the universe around us is a consequence of the fact there is such a thing as light! No more drugs for me, tonight.
    1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. I don't know if this is the same thing, but in my undergraduate days, I took way too many classes at the same time. My study method was to have my Linear Algebra laid out on the dining room table at one chair, my Structural Geology at another chair, my History of Modern Europe at another chair, then Modern Physics. I'd move from chair to chair as the night wore on, often 'til the Sun came up. If I hit a roadblock, I wouldn't instantly give up, but eventually I'd just move to the next chair. Frequently, by the time I sat in one place for a while, or hit a roadblock, I'd get another idea for that Linear Algebra proof. I've gone to bed MANY a time, obsessing over an intractable problem, and upon waking up the next day, a totally new strategy would occur to me. I never thought of it as psychic phenomenon. I just figured my subconscious just kept working on it, and the solutions would percolate up to my conscious mind, in some way. Dad was big on Sylva Mind Control, self-hypnosis, and accessing your alpha brainwave state. I'm a fragile person, with a relatively mild case of osteogenesis imperfecta, and I practiced self-hypnosis for pain remediation during many acute-pain periods of my life. Bring that heart rate and blood pressure down through a form of focused meditation and controlled breathing. I don't know if that had anything to do with my "sleep on it" strategy, or my "put it on the back burner, move on, and come back to it" strategy, but it got a pretty dumb guy all the way through a PhD program in mathematics.
    1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. I've always kind of thought guys with man-buns were a bit 'off.' Not quite sure what they're going for. It's one thing when a Parkour or martial artist do one for movement (and defense) purposes, but just sitting there, talking to people? So they just LIKE wearing all that long hair like a tight-ass all day. I mean, sure. The grill man at McDonald's wears a bun at work, because he HAS to. But YOU don't have to. So it's a LOOK you're going for. You did that to yourself on PURPOSE! You don't even have the excuse of "It's too long to hang down and it's too short to tie back," and even then, it'd take 2 or 3 man buns to tie it all up, because it's too short to tie up in one knot. And that's only in the transitional stage, where most guys just wear a ball cap all the time You went the extra mile and made a man bun, on PURPOSE. Add talking like a soy simp and I start thinking you're doing it for chicks, in a sick, "I get pussy by pretending I'm a total feminist" kind of way, which I kinda despise. Always gotta be the center of attention. Always simping and white-knighting. Ugh. As far as qualifying what you say, rather than just being yourself, that's actually pretty important. Not everybody can read your mind, or understand what you're really getting at. I've always been a bit of a brainiac, and it caused me a lot of problems with people who weren't. They weren't any stupider than me, but they weren't educated the same way I was. And their intelligence was bent more towards practical matters and social skills, where I've always been a bit of a social retard, due to my unique circumstances and heredity. When I was an undergrad, I ran in a lot of rougher circles, mainly due to recreational drugs. I had quite a few conversations that went south, because the guys I was talking to didn't understand all my 60-dollar words. I was never a joke-writer, but always looking for the setup that I could knock down. Some of the cleverest things I've said were taken as insults by the people who should've been flattered and laughed along with me. But they didn't get the reference, and thought I was putting them down by talking over their heads. But I still liked guys like them more than the guys I had to be around in my classes. Over time, I learned how to fit in. By the time I was in grad school, guys would tell me "You ain't like those other eggheads. What you say makes sense." Part of higher intelligence is not speaking your mind, but speaking to your audience. And I don't mean putting on a Southern accent to try to score points at the NAACP convention. Just plain speech. I'm doing just what Joe Rogan was talking about when he discussed the comments section and how invested people are. I don't look at it that way. Sure, there's a lot of "Joe, when you said such-and-such..." directed right at the channel operator, but REALLY, this is a lot of people expressing themselves freely. Some are kooks. I know I'm a kook. My excuse is being laid-up a lot of the time, and not all that mobile when I AIN'T laid-up. We're none of us really talking to YOU, Joe, because we know you're off to the next interview, and don't waste time and energy on the crazy comments section. We're really talking to each other, having a conversation about your conversation. This medium isn't JUST you, Joe. It's also a lot of people, and a lot of people GROWING before our eyes. I write to learn and to tear apart my ideas, refine my ideas, refine how I EXPRESS my ideas. There's a lot of learning taking place in these comment sections, in unexpected ways. The way I think of it is how dumb I think the average incoming college student was 40 years ago, when I left high school. Nowadays, most incoming college freshmen are dumber and less self-reliant (unbelievable how many academic advisers schools have, nowadays!). But go one layer underneath THAT, and the guys who do NOT go to college are hella SMARTER than the same kinds of guys were 40 years ago. We're talking blue-collar workers communicating through the written word on a daily basis, and pickin' up all KINDS of shit along the way. It only SEEMS bad, because the dumbest of us are also the most talkative, and learning new stuff while ruining everyone else's conversations, because they're dumb-asses. I'm here to tell you that 40 years ago, their equivalent couldn't write at all. The high bar is lower, but the low bar is a lot higher. And people are clearing the high bar almost by accident just by getting curious about things and having an Internet connection. It's happening all around us. A lot of people know a lot of things, these days. You'd be surprised.
    1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. MY income wasn't interrupted because of the job I have, but I respect the protesters who peaceably assembled with their firearms. The governor in question needed to be reminded that with all the trappings of power and police under their nominal control, they're still answerable to the people, and the ultimate power lies with the people. They can't just run roughshod over everybody because of a nasty flu, especially since we know that the mortality rates are much lower than we originally feared. But to ME, there's a balance to be struck. It's easy to tell yer 'Rona story, and for the foreseeable future, you will find many sympathetic ears and eyes, especially if you're famous, good-looking, and in the apparent bloom of life in your prime. But I always think about the bum who's been dumpster-diving (or trading odd jobs for a plate of food) in the alley behind the Italian restaurant that's now shut down. Or the guy who's been panhandling $50-$100 a day on a street corner, now that the streets are empty. Or the husband-and-wife team operating a small café... ANYbody whose income stream depends on that day's work. And no work? No money. The lock-down is very hard on the most vulnerable among us. And it's all because rich, well-fed white people are afraid of a virus that it appears is bad, but we know how to fight. We see Sweden building herd immunity. They were overwhelmed at first, because they didn't act to 'flatten the curve,' but things have settled down, and we have the benefit of their experiences for what works and what doesn't. I think a combo of social distancing to flatten the curve is enough for us to handle the medical emergency without shutting down every OTHER form of health care. 'Rona ain't the only thing you can die of, no matter how fully it has captured your attention. I'm not a big fan of illegal immigration, but knowing there are millions of such, and wanting the best possible outcome, the disappearance of "day-worker" gigs plus the fact that you're under the government's radar and want to STAY that way, you're much likely to either starve or resort to crime. That's assuming no 'Rona in the equation beyond the lock-down impacts. But because your situation is bad, you're run-down, and more susceptible to 'Rona and every OTHER cold or flu bug. People just focus on the one thing and they lose sight of the fact that the society is SO complex, with SO many inter-dependencies that NObody can really track, and fixing ANY ONE PROBLEM, PERFECTLY always comes at cost to something else. This is the problem with zero-sum thinking. The whole isn't greater than the parts, really. It's just that all the parts make too big an equation for anybody to manage all of them. You have to LET things happen as much as MAKE things happen. The lock-down was (It turns out) not bad decision-making under uncertainty. But as those uncertainties keep getting chipped away, and we find that our health services are NOT going to be overwhelmed, if we're smart about limiting outbreaks and dealing with outbreaks. The hospitals don't need to shut down. They just have to cooperate, so if Area X is hit hard, Area Y can pick up the slack. We're pretty sure that can be done, at this point. We know it can be deadly to the elderly, for obvious reasons, the same as any flu virus. And SOME people without any apparent co-morbidities are hit HARD, like Michael Yo was hit. I love how he gives props to his doctor. A lot of doctors might not be able to "think on their feet" and make intelligent adjustments to his treatment, based on how he's responding. I'm more than a little worried about catchin' the 'Rona, and I've always been appalled at how people will come in to work full of snot, coughing and sneezing, and spreading what they've got to everybody else, out of a misplaced sense of duty (or obsessive-compulsive disorder). The thing is, 10s of thousands die every year from the flu (creepin' cruds). Some take their flu shots every year. I never have, because I'd rather practice sensible distancing and keep my resistance up. And I see the folks who get the flu shots missing time at work because they've got the flu. This life ends for all of us we live the best lives we can. There's a balance between longevity and happiness. I'm tired of people who act like they'd live forever if some authority would just come along and make them safe from everything. "If it saves one life, it's worth it." With that kind of thinking, do away with motor vehicles. Outlaw alcohol. Make kids strap pillows to themselves every time they step outside...
    1
  216. 1
  217. 1