Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "" video.

  1. Dave is spot-on with his take on WW I. And when you look at the root causes of WW I, you see guys like Churchill trying to hold the British Empire together, and continue it. Churchill was first and foremost a scion of Victoria's England. The British Empire peaked during Victoria's reign, and Churchill and others did everything they could to reverse its inevitable decline. Germany owned Alsace-Lorraine and the Saar Basin after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. Britain and France plotted and plotted to get those territories back for France and to keep Germany from ever having the kind of colonial empire that to which Britain was still clinging and still clings to this day, with the backing of powerful but stupid USA. WW I, with USA assist, kept Britain and France in the driver's seat. WW II kept Britain and France in the driver's seat. When I look at American hegemony, it looks more like we're the big, stupid tough guy who keeps doing England and France's bidding.
    3
  2. You don't have to go to Oxford or Cambridge in order to have a pretty good grasp of the march of human progress, and critique figures from the past. If there's one thing I have learned over the last 40 years, it's that it often takes a highly educated and erudite individual to make what's good seem irredeemably bad and what's bad look heroic. Anyone who's lived through the last 20 or 30 years, watching the utter nonsense being promulgated by "smart people," knows I'm not lying and I'm not wrong. I wish I could say Murray believes everything he says, but he's made many disingenuous arguments and appeals to authority in order to win debates, even when I generally supported his side of the argument. Very tricky rhetorician. But when I see him employ his verbal judo tricks, and call out the other side for "verbal judo" or whatever, my faith in his sincerity wanes. He'll talk all day about Muslim grooming gangs, but I can't recall his ever calling out honey-pot operations (involving under-aged girls) by elements of British, American, and Israeli establishments.
    2
  3. Murray loses me when he goes full-on Zionist. So have a lot of conservative pundits, including Shapiro and Rubin, whom I supported in the past. Trump and RFK lose me when they go full-on Zionist. I think that Jews are split on the Zionist Project. But those who question it or criticize it are systematically de-platformed, discredited, or otherwise sidelined by those who are more interested in personal power than in God. I think Islam drew from Abrahamic tradition to weaponize religion for their benefit. I think Judaism drew from religions from around the world to weaponize religion for their benefit. That's where Mohammed got the idea. You have disunity and strife among your people? Unite them under the banner of religion, and WIN! Steamroll "heretics" and "infidels." They're sub-human, after all. I think Christianity started out as a rejection of much of this nonsense, but the versions of Christianity that ended up dominating were those which were supported by men seeking power over other men. We all look back fondly on Martin Luther's Theses, but then we see how the Lutheran Church eagerly melded itself with the temporal authorities when it got the chance, showing that the Lutheran Church is just like all the rest: Set up something good, and bad people will infiltrate and hijack it to their own personal ends.
    2