Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "The Fauci Emails" video.

  1.  @gerk7238  The scientific method is a method of multiple working hypotheses. You don't rule anything out, and you lean towards the theory that fits the facts in the most simple way (Occam's Razor - the simpler explanation is preferred/more likely). Wuhan Lab was at the epicenter. They were doing research on this precise strain of bat virus. Early on, we heard of scientists being sent home with corona-like symptoms in November 2019. The prima facie evidence is that it most likely got loose out of the lab, and that theory should've stood as at LEAST as probable as other theories, and more investigation needed to be done. What happened, instead, was the guy who SENT THE MONEY OVER TO WUHAN, Peter Daszak, was the guy whose word everybody took, without fact-checking - indeed, FaceBook made him their head fact-checker! And you know how THEY knew he had no conflict of interest? His word that he had no conflict of interest. And if you have no sense that theories embarrassing to China and Fauci's Funders were ruthlessly and arbitrarily suppressed as "debunked" without ANY real investigative reporting being done, then you haven't been paying attention. The fact that they got it all wrong can NOT be called "an honest mistake." It was pure censorship, implemented by the very person who was likely complicit in the creation of the virus. What YOU do is take the word of ONE GUY you decide to make the arbiter of truth, and then think it's OK to silence all competing theories. That's authoritarian bullshit. That's not how we produce knowledge in the West. That's now how we judge truth in the West. We spent millennia refining how we measure truth and reason to a better understanding of the world around us. Science. You know? All that stuff that made this conversation in the comments section possible? Nope. Once they make it political, nobody cares about truth any more, because to them, the truth is already absolutely known. You make a big show of "following the facts and evidence," but it is clear by the abject FAILURES that our leaders were not following facts and evidence, and many of the measures imposed did more harm than good.
    10
  2.  Gui Tard  He has good reasoning powers, but a very weak grasp of the fact set.
    3
  3. Of all the things they could discuss, they chose a subject neither one understands very well. Fun comments section, but the video is pretty vapid.
    2
  4.  @NBALIVETVbroadcast  Look up "DarkHorse Podcast."
    1
  5.  @HighNoone  : It's BECAUSE it's used as a specific against parasites, it was discovered to have a prophylactic effect against COVID-19. People in India on Ivermectin regimen were not catching the coof. These people were already taking one dose of ivermectin per week to protect against the parasites of which you speak. You know a little, but not the whole picture.
    1
  6.  @amccibils  Are you sure you're not confusing this with cinchona bark (HCQ)? It was discovered in South America by Jesuits. When I say "discovered," I mean that the Jesuits learned from the natives about quinine, the active ingredient in the bark. Yes. They DEFINITELY wanted everyone to take a Big Pharma vaccine, rather than hear from ANYbody who was successfully treating the coof with off-the-shelf drugs, like HCG, Ivermectin, and remdesivir (sp?). No. Can't patent those drugs. They've been around too long. You've gotta take this experimental vaccine. There're people suing under Nuremberg protocols for crimes against humanity, for their human experimentation. Meanwhile, treating the coof like some world-ending plague got a lot of people with cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and other ailments killed, because everything had to give way to the virus. Nothing else mattered. Not your job, not your business, not your mother locked up in a nursing home... I think we've all had our fill of medical tyranny by mental midgets and crooks.
    1