Comments by "" (@12q8) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. 106
  2. 75
  3. 31
  4. 19
  5. 17
  6. 16
  7. 14
  8. 11
  9. 9
  10. 8
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. > If there is a market for a state, can we really deny the market? > As soon as one person wants a state, that need is met by an entrepreneur. In that case, it would still be a voluntary association. If it tried to enforce anything, it would be hard since everyone would be against it. States, if we can call them that, would be voluntary subscription-based, where you pay a company for a package of services they can provide instead of being forced to. Since we don’t live in a world where we all share the same values and as rational, humans are fallible, it would be hard to maintain a world wide ancapistan. Banditry will exist, for example, and that would open a market for security. Currently, that market is a monopoly by the United States. It is part of a historical deal. Would be a good topic for a video. Somali pirates have stock markets for their activities. One way to look how it would play out, outside of idealistic ancap views, think of moral nihilism, anarchist egoism (Max Stirner), and free markets. There would be a market for everything. Literally everything. It opens the door for a lot of ideas for novels. Think of a society where gladiators still exist in the modern world, and people bet on who is going to win or get killed, in some city known for hosting those events, similar to how people see Las Vegas as the place for casinos. While on the other side of the world, people would see this as something against their moral values, and such businesses would not exist. As long as it is voluntary, there is no problem with it. Some would have careers as gladiators, fans globally, and people following them like sports nowadays. Capitalism has a narrower definition than free-market, despite ancaps using it to mean that. Capitalism refers more to the process of going to capital markets to collect capital, typically as loans, to start a business. Or at least that is how I understand it. Businesses could start in any shape or form in a free-market.
    1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1