Comments by "hg2" (@hg2.) on "National Geographic"
channel.
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Have these stupid climate quacks ever wondered why the change in CO2 concentration from 0.000200 to 0.000400 could cause such a catastrophe?
In percentage terms it's 0.02% to 0.04% increase on CO2 concentration. Big Deal!
In parts per 1,000,000 it's gone from 200 parts per million to 400 parts per million, and it's had no provable effect on climate, only conjecture and assertion, easily contradicted by observation, e.g.
The Little Ice Age,
no change in temp lately,
Viking settlements in Greenland,
20 periods of glaciation,
The Maunder Minimum
etc
etc
Of course, if you're an effeminate Starbucks twerp looking to get laid with some cheap pick up conversation about how "environmentally sensitive" and "sustainable" then maybe you do buy into the quackery of global warming if it helps you get laid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1