Youtube comments of hg2 (@hg2.).

  1. This doesn't sound like demented Joe Biden.
    113
  2. Do these network news reports make you sick? Or is it just me?
    61
  3. God speed. God bless.
    51
  4. The next step is a shakedown infrastructure: "Pay us or we'll ransack your business."
    49
  5. Led by the nose to carbon-quack taxes.
    49
  6. In other words, Illinois has lost its Middle Class. Sounds familiar. Nice going, Democrats.
    48
  7. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service.
    37
  8. It's simple -- it's a fad.
    27
  9. Where can I get a copy of the syllabus he wrote? "Introduction to Chemical Engineering" Channing Robertson (Is not on Amazon, ebay, or Google books)
    25
  10. Needs better audio.
    25
  11. Spend a few days in a Villages Lifestyle tour. You won't want to leave.
    25
  12. "Nobody builds here but me." Thank you, Mr. Stossel.
    24
  13. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    24
  14. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    20
  15. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    18
  16. Go Matt Walsh!
    17
  17. Gee. What a surprise.
    17
  18. Absolutely. Minority Report...here come, here we are.
    14
  19. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    13
  20. Notre Dame 2.0?
    13
  21. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, snd and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    13
  22. The Fed has opened up a free money store for short term speculators. The Fed has nationalized the Repo market.
    11
  23.  @clarkthomas354  "Please". You should have seen Lake Erie in the 70s. Now it's clean, but all industries are gone and all the cities are slums.
    11
  24. Characteristicly shallow, superficial MSM reporting.
    10
  25. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    10
  26. Sorry, no -- like Ron DeSantis, he's laying the groundwork for 2028. He's 37. He'll be around in 2028, but Trump won't. It hurts him big-time if he were to attack Trump.
    10
  27. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    10
  28. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    10
  29. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    10
  30. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    10
  31. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    10
  32. Bless you, Mr. President.
    9
  33.  @gagamba9198  No. Peter Zeihan makes snooty, condescending remarks about Trump (and his working-class constituents) every chance he gets, including here, with the "tweet" remark, in case you missed it.
    9
  34. Peter's elitist flaw is showing again
    9
  35. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    9
  36. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    9
  37. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    9
  38. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    9
  39. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    9
  40. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    9
  41. Big point on the last minute: once a month bring up to to operating temperature (i.e. boil out all the water condensation?).
    9
  42. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    9
  43. Look at the likes vs. dislikes. That says it all about this load of cr*p.
    9
  44. The statements he quoted are from his public persona. Was PT Barnum a narcissist, or just a showman?
    9
  45. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    9
  46. Does the fact that there is 6 months of darkness at the south pole contribute to lack of ozone there? Why doesn't Clorox, pool chlorine, or chlorine from seawater (NaCl "salt water) deplete ozone? Why do CFC's only deplete ozone at the south pole? Why are CFCs the only source of high-atmosphere chlorine? Being heavier than air, how do CFCs reach the stratosphere, which starts 6 miles up? Being heavier than air, what happens to CFCs when released into the atmosphere? If the ozone hole was "discovered" in the late 70s with satellite imagery, how do we know it wasn't there all along?
    8
  47. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    8
  48. Go Trump! MAGA!
    8
  49. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    8
  50. The essence of Femo-Fascism.
    8
  51.  @Your_mom736  Yes and no. Sorry, but I think decarbonization and GW are a load of it. And renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building. That said, $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a huge blessing to the world, and it's criminal that trivial selfish leverage can stand in the way of it. "Just compensation" - yes. Childish rejection - no. (Somebody suggested a mining co-op )
    8
  52. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    8
  53. Yes. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    8
  54. Thank you for sharing and informing us of this!
    7
  55. +Ragnaar Minnesota Ryan is a Starbucks virtue projector. Mirror gazers like that can't handle contradictions to their narrative of conceit.
    7
  56.  @russellk.bonney8534  "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    7
  57. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    7
  58. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    7
  59. Sorry, no -- like Ron DeSantis, he's laying the groundwork for 2028. He's 37. He'll be around in 2028, but Trump won't. It hurts him big-time if he were to attack Trump.
    7
  60.  @seichorn4079  For starters... It's 50 years of inflation and a worthless Republican Party.
    7
  61. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    7
  62. Do these network news reports make you sick? Or is it just me?
    7
  63. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"?
    7
  64. "Gaza could be the next Singapore"  Here's Alan Dershowitz making that comment (I don't know why Alan Dershowitz is a go-to guy for foreign policy, but in this case he makes "Adam Smith's" point:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISViioLUy0I I agree with Alan because the only thing holding Gaza back from middle-class prosperity was Hamas.  The never-had-a-real-job main stream media just talks about "the cycle of violence".  On the other hand, Adam Smith says "Little is needed to raise a society to the height of opulence but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice ... all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things." If the IDF went in there, occupied Gaza, and administered it like Britain administered Hong Kong, then Gaza would become "the Singapore of the Middle East".  Arabs are nothing if not enterprising. The only thing holding them back was Hamas. I bet after a generation or two, the IDF would say, "well, we're done here, it's time for us to go home."  I bet even money that Gaza's newly comfortable middle class with a lot to lose will say, "No! Don't leave!  The place will just be taken over by Hamas again and they'll trash the place."
    7
  65. Good decision! Best of luck to you and family. +++++++ Meanwhile, I've looked at some of the mealy-mouth comments on this page and it makes me think the Communist Party trolls are among us, doing their despicable bidding.
    7
  66. co2 is climatologically trivial. Climate quackery makes people feel less trivial, and is fashionable in Starbucks, but politically it is destructive, like communism (aka Bernie Sanders), which also plays well in Starbucks.
    6
  67. I fast forward 11 and he's still "I-ing" about I-this and I-that with his 'what a piece' wife in background. Is this video narcissism or is it just me?
    6
  68. Too bad videos like this don't get the visual aids parts right - they can't figure out whether to focus on the speaker or the power points he's talking about. Show the power point slides and not the speaker, please.
    6
  69. Too bad that stupid grey-head has to keep interrupting!
    6
  70. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    6
  71. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    6
  72. Am I hearing another "me me me me" video? (Or is it just 'me'?) [Who is this guy?]
    6
  73. Need louder volume.
    6
  74. Sorry, no -- like Ron DeSantis, he's laying the groundwork for 2028. He's 37. He'll be around in 2028, but Trump won't. It hurts him big-time if he were to attack Trump.
    6
  75. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    6
  76. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    6
  77. "The Jack Ruby snipers"
    6
  78. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    6
  79. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    6
  80. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    6
  81. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    6
  82. The embarrassment of riches.
    6
  83. "The Jack Ruby snipers"
    6
  84. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    6
  85. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    6
  86. "Science" has turned into a priesthood.
    6
  87. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    6
  88.  @eli-kathrinknudsen3644  No, it's called tribalism. Deal with it, s-----. Israel is the most liberal country in the middle east.
    6
  89. Bravo!
    6
  90. Too bad the videographer does such a poor job. Thousands of people could be getting a good intro to Chem E if somebody had noticed early on what a poor job was being done and easy it was to fix with a few words of advice, e.g. put the camera on what Professor Robertson is talking TO, not the professor himself.
    5
  91. Because it's a childish feel-good infomercial for economic idiots whole don't want to work real jobs.
    5
  92. TG for the video taping of this lecture. I wouldn't stand a chance without the rewind/replay feature. Thank you Stanford, YouTube, and Dr. Robertson (great lecturer!) (too bad the videography is so poor on the OTHer lectures)
    5
  93. poor videography, as usual.
    5
  94. Well said, JD!
    5
  95. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    5
  96. Time to start a Climate Crap Coalition.
    5
  97.  @nicolasolton  His gift for analysis has insulated him from the real world of the middle class (world wide, not just America). Especially infuriating is his ignorant and cavalier attitude about INFLATION - i.e., the screwing and robbery of the middle class by government debasement of the currency. "He'd fit in well with the Davos crowd." His dismissal and contempt for the American working middle class (i.e., MAGA Trump voters) is elitist to the core. "Get a real job, Peter!"
    5
  98. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    5
  99. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    5
  100. Why isn't the link to his article shown in the DESCRIPTION below the video? (It annoys me that so many vloggers will say (not said here, but just in general) "link in the description below" and the link ISN'T THERE.)
    5
  101. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    5
  102. Fantastic! Uncle Tony is inspiring a new generation of mechanical engineers!
    5
  103. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    5
  104. Watch Scott Kilmer for the reality of EPA-imposed eco-boost and turbo chargers.
    5
  105. Republicans.
    5
  106. It's simple -- it's a fad.
    5
  107. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    5
  108.  @keitatsutsumi  Huawei has nothing to do with the CCP? Please.
    5
  109. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    5
  110. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    5
  111. Gee! Aren't WE the smartest people in the world! --- There's one problem: the twerp isn't actually selling stuff, he's lobbying for more subsidies and laws to force people to buy this crap.
    5
  112.  @BreninyGeifr  I take it you're not a farmer.
    5
  113. Is there video to this or is there something wrong with my phone?
    5
  114.  @Frypunked  Let's start with you.
    5
  115. I still think they should abolish the Jones Act.
    5
  116. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    5
  117. This stupid show and pseudo intellectualism. Hillary Clinton - the font of insight and honesty - LMAO!
    5
  118. Don't like this reporters attitude.
    5
  119. Philippines is high on the list for Americans on Social Security who want to live cheaply.
    5
  120. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    5
  121. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    5
  122. Kaminsky was TERRIBLE interviewer of Kyle Bass.
    4
  123. +Ryan G. I reject the climate quack Starbucks virtue projection innuendo of the question.
    4
  124. +utubeaccount The reason we have have stupid conversations like this in the first place is because blowhards like you can't keep to minding your own business and trying to impose a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us.
    4
  125. Listen to this millennial dipshit. Hey! Did you hear what Trump said about CASTRO?
    4
  126. Too bad the videography is so poor, (we don't need to watch the speaker speak (audio works for that) , we do need to see the slides, which the camera moves away from. The videographer thinks he's on a Hollywood movie set.
    4
  127. Troy Z ---- China Uncensored is negative because the CCP is bad, or are you a member thereof?
    4
  128. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    4
  129.  @AcmeAce  Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    4
  130.  @smallpeople172  No, promises count in relationships. The West showed a poor understanding of Russian history.
    4
  131.  @dominicfucinari1942  1) get a real job. 2) you missed the point
    4
  132.  @ronw76  Were you "like this" on the job?
    4
  133. A Summer LTVA? Great work, Glorious. "Bob Wells 2.0" -- Bob would be proud. Sorry if I sound opportunist, but I take opportunities like this to propose "A Summer LTVA". Quartzsite and La Posa LTVAs are "ground zero" for the nomad lifestyle, and they are a first stop "slam dunk" solution to the problem of living on a low senior-citizen budget. Wouldn't it be nice to have a Summer LTVA? "A Quartszite at 8000'"? I take opportunities like these to toss the idea out. In winter, Quartzsite is the "seniors safety net" -- Thank God. But when summer comes, well, I see you're doing work so people can stay in Quartzsite year round, but that summer heat... Once again, wouldn't it be nice to have a Summer LTVA at 8000'? I add details to this "pitch" every time I post to Youtube. Here are some sites over 8000' where something might be done (I'm just an armchair/would-be nomader and spend a lot of time looking at Google maps): - Tres Piedras, NM - Red River area, NM - The Mescalero Indian Reservation near Alamogordo, NM - The Fort Apache Indian Reservation near Pinetop, AZ - Dixie National Forest near Duck Creek, UT -- But the prime location, IMHO, would be on Rt. 180 north of Flagstaff near the Arizona Snowbowl. Housing of this nature is national issue. Bob Wells says he gets "100s" of correspondence from desperate seniors. The problem is real, the Government has the land, the Government is there to serve The People. BLM sure has hit a home run with its LTVAs and dispersed camping. A summer LTVA looks like a natural. Great work! Keep 'em coming. Organizations who might be interested in a summer LTVA (esp. north of Flagstaff): National Council On Aging https://www.ncoa.org/ AARP https://www.aarp.org/ RV Industry Association https://www.rvia.org/who-we-serve/manufacturers Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce https://www.flagstaffchamber.com/ HOWA - HomesOn Wheels Alliance (Bob Wells) https://homesonwheelsalliance.org/. PS: is anyone running shuttlebus service to Blythe/Phoenix/Yuma from Quartzsite? I bet the casinos would be happy to help out with that : )
    4
  134. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    4
  135. Meet the next Secretary of Energy.
    4
  136.  @yoyoma17  Aghghgh... He is an obnoxious, oppressive, elitist about the middle class, inflation, climate change, "renewable energy", immigration, "populism".
    4
  137. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    4
  138. Sure! Just like they worked so well in China. (f---- i---)
    4
  139. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    4
  140. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    4
  141.  @Bibitybopitybacon  I doubt it. Didn't stop Napoleon or Hitler. They want the Polish gap, +.
    4
  142. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    4
  143. Watch Scott Kilmer for the reality of EPA-imposed eco-boost and turbo chargers.
    4
  144. Meet the next Secretary of Energy.
    4
  145. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    4
  146. Of interest to retirees looking to retire on a budget, a subset of this list is: Otherwise attractive towns that are losing population. (As opposed to towns losing population because they are dangerous and bad.)
    4
  147. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    4
  148.  @jakeaurod  His contempt for the liars and opportunists of politics is justified.
    4
  149. I still think they should abolish the Jones Act.
    4
  150. Tankers? Why not just send the tankers to where fresh water is plentiful and bring it to where it isn't?
    4
  151. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    4
  152. Notre Dame 2.0?
    4
  153. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    4
  154. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    4
  155. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    4
  156. I still think they should abolish the Jones Act.
    4
  157. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    4
  158. See the Kirk Sorenson, thorium videos. Also, use natural gas to make ammonia (fertilizer), CO2 is a byproduct of that.
    4
  159. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    4
  160. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    4
  161. Notre Dame 2.0?
    4
  162. Can't we just See The Video and then hear the commentary?
    4
  163. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    4
  164.  @HoneyBadger80886  "Get a real job."
    4
  165. Weren't FEMA personnel briefed on those cultural differences? Floods like this are normal for Appalachia. Why wasn't FEMA prepared for that aspect of relief work in Appalachia?
    4
  166. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    4
  167. What are the charges?
    4
  168. This is the Liberal equivalent of book burning.
    4
  169. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    4
  170. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    4
  171. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    4
  172. Do these network news reports make you sick? Or is it just me?
    4
  173. This is what passes for depth with Hillary Clinton and the idiots of YT.
    4
  174. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    4
  175.  @deepfuckingabundance  Yes, he's a Mitch McConnell of the academic Uniparty-ists.
    4
  176. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    4
  177. Interesting content... ... but too much accent and drama in the voice. It would be easier to listen to if the text were read by MS Word.
    4
  178. Sarah Palin held the torch till Donald Trump arrived.
    4
  179. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    4
  180. Meet the next Secretary of Energy.
    4
  181. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    4
  182.  @Hermitthecog  The waste problem is stupidly overblown.
    4
  183. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    4
  184. Ok. It's the cash value of the offer. Obama doesn't understand America, so how can he love it? But the cash value of the offer should be worth it to President Trump.
    4
  185. This is the 4th watching of this to try to "get it". You can tell students weren't getting either. If they didn't have the rewind/replay advantage of these videos, i don't see how they ever would. Obviously they're not going to be tested on this material- whatever. But iterative rewind-replay eventually gets the job done. Bravo Professor Channing! Bravo YouTube!
    3
  186. Welcome to snake-oil vending !
    3
  187. Solar Sucks! It is Kids Lemonade Stand science.
    3
  188. +Ryan G. AGM is climate quackery and human-sacrifice superstition - there's a contradiction in there somewhere.
    3
  189. Yeah, you like the gee-whiz song and dance tech-hype, loaded with half truths, imprecisions, and hype innuendos, like that giant piece of climate quackery Inconvenient Truth.
    3
  190. Bravo Peter! Great you have the patience to talk sense to this mob whipped up on climate quack superstition!
    3
  191. Too bad the narrator talks with such a truncated "I know this stuff so well I'm bored with it so I'm going to breeze right through it" smart-alec attitude. (Like Sheldon with an attitude)
    3
  192. @HanJanssen-pg9jh I don't think so. "Other earthquake areas" are places with tectonic plate fault lines; deep level. This is just shallow level removal of gas pressure that was holding up an already weak sandstone structure.
    3
  193. Europe is degenerate and condescending with its welfarism which is paid for by American defense spending.
    3
  194. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    3
  195. Peter, Please don't drop words at the end of sentences.
    3
  196. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    3
  197. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    3
  198. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    3
  199. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    3
  200. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    3
  201.  @Michaelw777.52  Points well taken. Did you see my post about a summer LTVA? I know it's a broad question, but how do you handle Summer?
    3
  202.  @CCyndrella  LTVA - Long Term Visitor Area (Quartzsite, Imperial Dam, and several others). RV-camp on government land for 6 months for $180. Water, dump, garbage included.
    3
  203. This happened in the 70s.
    3
  204. It's simple -- it's a fad.
    3
  205. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    3
  206. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    3
  207. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    3
  208. BS! Big deal. Carbon quackery.
    3
  209. Need lapel mic.
    3
  210. Min 17:00 California all over again.
    3
  211. Weren't FEMA personnel briefed on those cultural differences? Floods like this are normal for Appalachia. Why wasn't FEMA prepared for that aspect of relief work in Appalachia?
    3
  212. The Russian involvement in the Syrian slaughter must have a "stick it to Turkey" component.
    3
  213. Starts out: what a load of it.
    3
  214. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    3
  215. Sh*tty interview.
    3
  216. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    3
  217. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    3
  218.  @beeble2003  Thank you. What it "p-value"?
    3
  219.  @dilvishpa5776  Why not? H20 is a greenhouse gas. We experience its heat as humidity. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. We experience its heat too. How are C02 and H2O materially different in term of their effect on climate?
    3
  220. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    3
  221.  @olivesama  Yes.
    3
  222.  @chillxxx241  Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    3
  223. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    3
  224. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    3
  225. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    3
  226. Thank you. Am looking for a cheap place tp spend summers where average high temperature is 75 or less.
    3
  227. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    3
  228. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    3
  229. Meet the next Secretary of Energy.
    3
  230.  @trplankowner3323  1) You're in agreement with Kilmer on Toyotas. 2) Toyotas aren't made in Mexico, so you're missing the whole point. 3) I don't think you know more about cars than Scott Kilmer.
    3
  231. Meet the next Secretary of Energy.
    3
  232. MIT's videos are useless manipulating fractions of courses. Public universities should have funding requirements that all their courses get Youtube-ed, with handout material published.
    3
  233. Operation Gang Rape.
    3
  234.  @morro190  Peter Zeihan makes snooty, condescending remarks about Trump (and his working-class constituents) every chance he gets, including here, with the "tweet" remark, in case you missed it. No, he's an ivory-tower academic privileged elitist with condescension for the middle class that elected Donald Trump.
    3
  235.  @7891ph  1: Peter Zeihan makes snooty, condescending remarks about Trump (and his working-class constituents) every chance he gets, including here, with the "tweet" remark, in case you missed it. 2: What do you expect? You have to start somewhere. Give it time -- it's a government organization. 3: your comment is repulsive.
    3
  236. Better enunciation please.
    3
  237. A lot were happy that the evil Saddam got overthrown.
    3
  238. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    3
  239. Yes, WGAS about this clickbait video?
    3
  240. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    3
  241. Advise showing the whole video first, THEN do the segment by segment analysis.
    3
  242.  @MrChris20912  Condense humid air with electricity? ... Sounds like artificial rain. Can we see a cost comparison with simply filling supertankers with water where it does rain naturally, and shipping it to ... "dry place"?
    3
  243.  @TwoBitDaVinci  Your channel should be renamed: The Dopamine Fantasy
    3
  244. Great work! Didn't know there was a Tiananmen Square memorial in America. Will spread the word. America should make that spot a National Monument. Tell your Congressman.
    3
  245. What about China's wink and a nod to Putin about the invasion at the olympics?
    3
  246. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    3
  247. The Carbon Aristocracy
    3
  248. Don't understand reverse repo. Need an expansion on that. Why do banks need collateral if they already have cash?
    3
  249. I still think they should abolish the Jones Act.
    3
  250. Dude... You look hot. Hope you have a cooler of Gatorade.
    3
  251. This guy's criticizing the hard working success of Philippino nurses? Give me a break.
    3
  252. Don't like the hustler voice. Don't like the filibuster boilerplate narrative. "Please get to the point without the manipulative song and dance."
    3
  253. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    3
  254. A government-dictated market... great going, guys.
    3
  255. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    3
  256. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    3
  257. Nick, I hear you selling out to the self-righteous and sanctimonious.
    3
  258. All you have to do is keep saying the word "sustainable" - it makes people sick and want to throw up. Then they won't be hungry anymore.
    3
  259. No! Ethanol is NOT GASOLINE. ... But this video is clickbait.
    3
  260. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    3
  261.  @malachkah  Can I use your post as an example of CCP shilling?
    3
  262. No. People still want BETTER lives <--- that will be the source of growth.
    3
  263. Min 8:00 What happened to those big carbon blocks?
    3
  264. A professional narrator or machine reading would help. It starts to sound like the pre-flight instructions on an airline.
    3
  265. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    3
  266. I still think they should abolish the Jones Act.
    3
  267. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    3
  268.  @mod4rchive  He's saying "we" when talking about a branch of the genocidal Chinese Communist Party. I'm not "being paranoid", you're being ignorant.
    3
  269. Note that we have Engr masters degree-ers here extolling this video. Doesn't that mean that all that book learning was was "fraudulent" in some way? i.e. not really knowing what you're doing? Now, I haven't done a pencil and paper math problem since Calc 1. Is it asking so much to put a PAUSE in the narrative so the rest of us can catch up? So it doesn't sound so "gee I'm so smart" millennial twerpish?
    3
  270. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    3
  271.  @Frypunked  ^^ believes in human sacrifice.
    3
  272. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    3
  273. Good material, by needs a professional narrator; get tired of the crackling, losing-the-voice drop-off at the end of every sentence.
    3
  274. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    3
  275. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    3
  276. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    3
  277. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    3
  278.  @timguillory6339  $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    3
  279. Yes -- he has something we all respect: professionalism.
    3
  280. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    3
  281. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    3
  282.  @jantschierschky3461  Extreme weather events???? What a load of media crap. Don't drink that koolaid.
    3
  283. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    3
  284. "O22" ? Sorry, don't know that one (RTR? Definitely. "Descend On Bend" - heard if it. O22 -- anyone have a link on that?
    3
  285.  @jwrosenbury  Yes -- even moreso for the Quaise Energy project. And do these people understand that they can exhaust the heat of the surroundings? "Cool off" the rock, as it were? I've heard of geothermal sites that give out after a few... years? (Especially for fracking sites; yes it's hot at first, but it only stays hot if it's near magma/mantal (?) to replace the heat removed.)
    3
  286. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    3
  287. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    3
  288. @ncponder  $60 billion dollars worth of copper for the human race vs. YOUR backyard? Please. Grow up.
    3
  289. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    3
  290.  @bennyboy5374  I'd rather hear his analysis than yours.
    3
  291. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    3
  292.  @Vzzdak  Expanding westward from the German border after the collapse of Soviet Union.
    3
  293. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    3
  294. Claw back inflation's cheating wealth transfer to Warren Buffet and the 1%.
    3
  295. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets.
    3
  296. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    3
  297. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"?
    3
  298. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    3
  299. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    3
  300. Go Trump! MAGA!
    3
  301. I call BS. That's what tankers are for.
    3
  302. But I have to ask, isn't that the beauty of SQL?, that you CAN "dump things" into it? (Try doing that with IMS -- arghg.)
    3
  303. Singapore can't handle the increased traffic? I doubt that. And why would anyone pay fees to go through the canal when they can go around Singapore fir free?
    3
  304. NEGATIVE ! Bikes are a HAZARD to pedestrians AND motorists! They RUIN the pedestrian and motorist infrastructures -- BAD IDEA! ! !
    2
  305. Dumb Dumb Dumb... "Renewables" are a Kids Lemonade Stand business at poor-peoples taxpayer expense. See Germany for how to screw up your energy production.
    2
  306. +m1aws The increasing stupidity of the comments here are remarkable. It's like a race to the bottom.
    2
  307. +Alex James Stupid Bernie Sanders Vermont SHUT DOWN a nuclear power plant that supplied the whole state with power. That RAISED THE PRICE of electricity for poor people. Enter rinky dink Solar... that's the context of your disgusting "making it work". You and your Starbucks poseurs are disgusting.
    2
  308. I'm supposed to be impressed by this crap?
    2
  309. It's foolish to discuss "education" without specifying the age of the student.
    2
  310. +Uriah Graves climate quackery isn't about science, it's about power, taxes, and imposing human sacrifice.
    2
  311. Non-crazy Americans don't take the "Russian election collusion" seriously -- I think it's preposterous.
    2
  312. Have these stupid climate quacks ever wondered why the change in CO2 concentration from 0.000200 to 0.000400 could cause such a catastrophe? In percentage terms it's 0.02% to 0.04% increase on CO2 concentration. Big Deal! In parts per 1,000,000 it's gone from 200 parts per million to 400 parts per million, and it's had no provable effect on climate, only conjecture and assertion, easily contradicted by observation, e.g. The Little Ice Age, no change in temp lately, Viking settlements in Greenland, 20 periods of glaciation, The Maunder Minimum etc etc Of course, if you're an effeminate Starbucks twerp looking to get laid with some cheap pick up conversation about how "environmentally sensitive" and "sustainable" then maybe you do buy into the quackery of global warming if it helps you get laid.
    2
  313. +Simon WoodburyForget In an earlier time, it was idiots like you who brought us collectivised agriculture aka communism.
    2
  314. +Passed High School Physics Absolutely, Passed. This "renewables" crap is the Kids Lemonade Stand version of energy production.
    2
  315. +topflight408 YOUTUBERS BEWARE: This is the kind of thug that's behind the quack-science superstition of the solar crap.
    2
  316. +Mentholatum101 Solar hustling is justified by a quack-science superstition called "global warming".
    2
  317. +Passed High School Physics Never mind. NIF is National Ignition Facility, a laser fusion money pit boondoggle that is always 10 years away from commercialization - another screwing of the taxpayer.
    2
  318. Too bad the camera doesn't stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only audio is necessary from the speaker, the visual is distracting.
    2
  319. +vikash achary co2 is climate trivial, at most. co2 is beneficial to plant life ("crops") co2 is measured in 300-600 ppm (Parts Per MILLION), or 0.03 % of the atmosphere - i.e. a trace gas climate is always changing. given the climatological trivialness of co2, the is plenty of reason to believe co2 increases are an effect - not cause - of warming. if there is an option, warming is preferable to cooling. This is a hack political hustle advanced by opportunists and "useful idiots".
    2
  320. You guys are such melodramatic idiots.
    2
  321. Makes him look like a schmuck.
    2
  322. +MrHabart Right on Mr H. Climate quackery is not about science, it's about power, imposing taxes, settled up cushy-job bureaucracies, and inflicting human sacrifice. Bill Nye works for government-liberal un-American PBS, and wants a job as high priest of climate quackery superstition.
    2
  323. Tip: in other words, min 31:30, the capillary will "suck" all fliud it can till osmotic pressure = fluid pressure and transfer stops, at 35 ml mercury.
    2
  324. Check out Thorium videos by Kirk Sorenson and others for a real energy alternative.
    2
  325. Absolutely Josh! Keep telling it to these koolaid drinking climate quack bullies, including Bill Nye. I guess he's not much of a scientist - more a talented teacher performer. He should stick with theatrics - and that's probably why he falls for the climate quackery, it's the drama of it.
    2
  326. Hey Trust Fund Kid! do the world a favor and Go get a REAL JOB.
    2
  327. +Hoochi Koochi What a stupidly relativist comment. Do you even know about, for instance, Chinese organ donning murders?
    2
  328. “X” Marks The Spot—-Wages Started Losing When The Dollar Was Delinked From Gold In 1971 http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/x-marks-the-spot-wages-started-losing-when-the-dollar-was-delinked-from-gold-in-1971/
    2
  329. Science is about successful prediction. GW is a total failure by that measure and it's easy to see why. (20 periods of glaciation with warming in between. What caused THAT warming? Mastodon flatulence?) GW isn't about science, it's about power, imposing taxed, bureaucratic empire building, and human sacrifice.
    2
  330. Abel, it's a stupid trumped up issue hustlers are trying to support to reduce other people's freedom and standard of living. These are bad people trying to impose superstition and paganism and human sacrifice.
    2
  331. It give the statest elites more constituency to impose control over the middle class. They are importing dependents and thugs. "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the government do unto you."
    2
  332. +Ashish Patel In other words: more cost shifting to apartment renters and poor people, right? See how's Germany's play-energy indulgence is working out out and how rates are going through the roof for everyone except thise playing Kids Lemonade Stand play-energy generation.
    2
  333. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    2
  334. Germany's depopulation was in full swing 40 years ago.
    2
  335. +CNCmachiningisfun Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    2
  336. Climate Quackery is an excuse by government thugs to rip the rest of us off.
    2
  337. This thuggery should be interpreted in terms of property rights ("liberty"). Think Ronald Reagan and "I paid for this microphone." ============ The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property."
    2
  338. Another "Too bad the videographer does such a poor job with the slides."
    2
  339. There's something I resent about the "bedtime story" tone of MSM crap like this.
    2
  340. Too bad the camera doesn't just stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only the audio is necessary from the speaker. The visual is distracting.
    2
  341. It's ditracting that this is partially a mating song-and-dance.
    2
  342. Min 17:00 California all over again.
    2
  343. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    2
  344. The banana republic has arrived.
    2
  345.  @ivilivo  Yes - I'm sure "pursuit of happiness" played a big role in feudalism.
    2
  346. Too... halting... staccato... voice... delivery.
    2
  347. Am I hearing another "me me me me" video? (Or is it just 'me'?) [Who is this guy?]
    2
  348.  @geordieinca9834  Yes - it's looks like you noticed the "me me me me" perspective of some of these YouTube denizens too.
    2
  349. Cultural Revolution.
    2
  350. Round numbers: 1) Ok, electricity is 4x more expensive to heat with the fossil fuel. 2) the electric heat pump produces 4x as much heat as consumed to extract it from the water. 3) so a big heat pump breaks even with fossil fuel, BEFORE spending several thousand dollars for the heat pump equipment and installation. "Next..."
    2
  351. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"?
    2
  352. Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    2
  353. Climate change is crap. It is 21st century superstition. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    2
  354.  @johnjohnson-ss4vu  WHAT is the "price of diversity"?
    2
  355.  @jeffk464  Try getting your money out. Do you know about FATCA? Do you think they're going to let you off that easy?
    2
  356.  @johnlacey3857  I'm so impressed with your living-room knowledge of the mining business.
    2
  357.  @johnlacey3857  I can smell the never-had-a-real-job types.
    2
  358. "Gaza could be the next Singapore"  Here's Alan Dershowitz making that comment (I don't know why Alan Dershowitz is a go-to guy for foreign policy, but in this case he makes "Adam Smith's" point:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISViioLUy0I I agree with Alan because the only thing holding Gaza back from middle-class prosperity was Hamas.  The never-had-a-real-job main stream media just talks about "the cycle of violence".  On the other hand, Adam Smith says "Little is needed to raise a society to the height of opulence but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice ... all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things." If the IDF went in there, occupied Gaza, and administered it like Britain administered Hong Kong, then Gaza would become "the Singapore of the Middle East".  Arabs are nothing if not enterprising. The only thing holding them back was Hamas. I bet after a generation or two, the IDF would say, "well, we're done here, it's time for us to go home."  I bet even money that Gaza's newly comfortable middle class with a lot to lose will say, "No! Don't leave!  The place will just be taken over by Hamas again and they'll trash the place."
    2
  359. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    2
  360. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  361. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 ..
    2
  362.  @WakefieldTolbert  She "stands with" quacks and frauds like: Al Gore Michael Mann IPCC ?
    2
  363. Do these network news reports make you sick? Or is it just me?
    2
  364. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    2
  365. Yes, it was a pleasure to see.
    2
  366. Notre Dame 2.0?
    2
  367. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    2
  368. Well said, JD!
    2
  369. Don't like the hustler voice. Don't like the filibuster boilerplate narrative. "Please get to the point without the manipulative song and dance."
    2
  370.  @PBRRoughStockRanch  Missed the point again. Re-read my post. It's not "them", it's that mawkish "little house on the prairie" vlogger.
    2
  371. Great work.
    2
  372. Would a Deluth-Minneapolis canal be worth building?
    2
  373.  @ronw76  Ok. Any thoughts on doubling Arizona's water supply with aqueducts from the Missouri River (up near Bozeman)?
    2
  374. Yes! This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    2
  375.  @WoTMike1989  Wrong. Look at the graph of median per capita real income vs. GDP per capita.
    2
  376. Index debt to the CPI.
    2
  377.  @perp1exed  Sounds better than what those idiots wanted to do with farmers.
    2
  378.  @MeeesterBond17  No - it's a distinction without a difference. ... And OJ is innocent.
    2
  379. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    2
  380.  @Michaelw777.52  Thanks - esp the compare/contrast of Imperial Dam vs. Quartzsite.
    2
  381. Please get a less dramatic narrator. I can't listen to it long.
    2
  382. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    2
  383. In other words, we can give ourselves a "cancer vaccination" by exposing ourselves to high radiation?
    2
  384. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    2
  385.  @mplslawnguy3389  See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    2
  386.  @markdesrosiers9179  Context: new batteries * Wish I had a dollar for every time I heard that.
    2
  387. I think you mean protection RACKET.
    2
  388. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    2
  389. Is he a lucky man or what?
    2
  390. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    2
  391. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  392. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    2
  393. Yes, the oath to Persevere, Protect, and Defend The Constitution of the United States.
    2
  394. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    2
  395. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    2
  396. Go Trump! MAGA!
    2
  397. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    2
  398. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    2
  399. Poor acoustics. Why do these MSM reports sound like fluff pieces and insults to the intelligence?
    2
  400. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    2
  401.  @annaclarafenyo8185  There is no absorption of infrared in the atmosphere, the infrared just bounces around on the way to space. When you add CO2, you increase the path-length for your average photon to escape, heating the Earth like a blanket. That's it. ^^ I think this is the answer I've been trolling for for a few days: Question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. an h2o molecule? ^^ The answers got were a monuments to doubletalk. I COULD NOT GET a straight answer to this question. Is that the relationship between "absorb" (frequently used term) and "scatter"????
    2
  402. No! Ethanol is NOT GASOLINE. ... But this video is clickbait.
    2
  403. We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food -- it's a baseline.  Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.
    2
  404. Please get a less dramatic narrator. I can't listen to it long.
    2
  405. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    2
  406. The banana republic has arrived.
    2
  407.  @TempOne-vh4fd  A lot of "indy" news people are going there and saying it's a mess (Glenn Beck, Blaze TV)
    2
  408. Thanks for making, Zach. Always interesting.
    2
  409. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    2
  410. Go Vivek!
    2
  411. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    2
  412.  @MrSparkums  The cheats at the Federal Reserve have cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek. Next is the turning of the middle class into tenant serfs.
    2
  413. Trump won. The 2020 election was stolen. Arizona, Wisconsin partial audits conclusion: DECERTIFY. Jan 6th <--- FBI, Nancy Pelosi, DC setup. Re: Ray Epps. Jan 6th arrestees <--- political prisoners. Jan 6th hearings <--- Stalinist show trial and a load of crap.
    2
  414. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    2
  415. Salty brine being dumped out in the already-salty ocean is an environmental problem? Come on... you do too many "real world" videos to fall for that one. I say bravo! to all who bring life-giving WATER to scorching desert.
    2
  416. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  417. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    2
  418. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    2
  419. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    2
  420.  @maryhadda8420  Sorry, but "that's nonsense". Please spend a few hours on the Kirk Sorenson thorium videos. We have been such fools. "Be among the first to figure that out."
    2
  421.  @maryhadda8420  Then you didn't read enough. It has everything going for it. "burning dirt" they call it.
    2
  422. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    2
  423. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    2
  424.  @Classical741  The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    2
  425. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  426. What is "p-hacking"?
    2
  427. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    2
  428. Is it a good idea to be showing the ship the Bradleys will be sailing on?
    2
  429.  @dilvishpa5776  This sounds contradictory: "... so there are no “soft shoulders”, and a few degrees of temperature increase will widen the CO2 absorption range, but at 273K that effect will be insignificant."
    2
  430.  @c13laser  How do you explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    2
  431. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    2
  432.  @cdl0  So, ... the more co2 in the air, the more that gets washed out by rain?
    2
  433.  @cdl0  Context:. Question: more co2 in the air means more co2 washed out by rain? cdl0's answer: no. ^^ Sorry, but that doesn't make sense. What if the atmosphere was 90% co2 (instead of its 0.04% it is now)? The rain wouldn't have more co2 in it?
    2
  434.  @testman9541  Beside the point.
    2
  435. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    2
  436. "The Jack Ruby snipers"
    2
  437. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    2
  438. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    2
  439. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    2
  440.  @seichorn4079  Really? Have we seen that movie before?
    2
  441. Climate Quackery and superstition.
    2
  442. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    2
  443. What about the quasars?
    2
  444. What a load of denial cr*p.
    2
  445. Well done. Thanks.
    2
  446. Weren't FEMA personnel briefed on those cultural differences? Floods like this are normal for Appalachia. Why wasn't FEMA prepared for that aspect of relief work in Appalachia?
    2
  447.  @nicksonmwenda1507  Apply for a "green energy" boondoggle grant, courtesy of those chump taxpayers.
    2
  448.  @_Circus_Clapped_  Costs? Benefits? What does that matter to these space cadets?
    2
  449. I wish, but doesn't it make the mistake of thinking democrats and their supporters have scruples? "No wall" is for Democrats is like "we shall overcome" - it's a part of their platform.
    2
  450. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    2
  451. Interesting, as always, but need less "up and down" in the voice volume. A steadier voice volume would be easier to listen to; too much "trail off" at the end of sentences and paragraphs.
    2
  452. And she is a personally repulsive creep.
    2
  453. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    2
  454. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    2
  455. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!!
    2
  456. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  457. Thanks for making. But shouldn't use average temperature when talking about the desert. Summer deserts are often simply uninhabitable without a total, expensive AC environment.
    2
  458. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    2
  459.  @jackfanning7952  I suppose you believed Al Gore about the polar bears too.
    2
  460.  @jackfanning7952  I don't recall recommending that.
    2
  461. Too much sing-song in the voice.
    2
  462. Can't take the over-dramatic narrator voice.
    2
  463. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    2
  464. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    2
  465. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    2
  466. This guy makes me sick.
    2
  467.  @iamgreat1234  US didn't "build Singapore". Singaporeans built Singapore.
    2
  468. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    2
  469. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    2
  470.  @KevinBalch-dt8ot  ?? Does the US have a competitive attitude and capability when it comes to nuclear power? No and No. But China does.
    2
  471.  @jamieheald8732  He is an elitist, with public policy influence.
    2
  472. I'm getting sick of these British accents.
    2
  473. "This looks like fun!" Thank you so much.
    2
  474. I call BS. That's what tankers are for.
    2
  475. 👍👍👍 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    2
  476. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    2
  477. Good stuff, but it could use some diagrams or flow charts.
    2
  478.  @willbusn5683  ^^ Another elitist remark from a detached American who is oblivious to how desperate the situation is.
    2
  479. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    2
  480.  @maxireigl1919  ^^ Nothing to see here. Move along please.
    2
  481. Bad voice - irritating, abrasive and obnoxious. Get a professional voice-over or just have Adobe PDF read the text.
    2
  482. Good stuff, but it could use some diagrams or flow charts.
    2
  483. How many times does she say "right wing"? Does she ever say "left wing"?
    2
  484.  @brucet1043  Ok, why do they do that?
    2
  485.  @emotionz3  Scott Kilmer would agree.
    2
  486.  @marcondespaulo  Peter Zeihan makes snooty, condescending remarks about Trump (and his working-class constituents) every chance he gets, including here, with the "tweet" remark, in case you missed it.
    2
  487.  @marcondespaulo  Right. My issue is with Peter Zeihan being a smug twerp about Donald Trump and his constituency.
    2
  488. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    2
  489. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  490. Needs a lapel mic for better audio.
    2
  491. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    2
  492. Go Trump! MAGA!
    2
  493. I think he's inspiring a new generation of mechanical engineers.
    2
  494. Wish these presenters could learn to NOT gesticulate. And this guy's slovenly appearance makes you appreciate dress codes.
    2
  495.  @ProfessorDaveExplains  ? You've got the slob's looks, which conveys the hippie-slobs attitude: "I don't care if you think I look like a slob, because I DGAS what you think."
    2
  496. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    2
  497. NBC - Nothing But Crap.
    2
  498. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  499. Yes, WGAS about this clickbait video?
    2
  500. Too much accent. Better to have a machine read the text.
    2
  501.  @charlesmd  Canada sucks. Anytime, Alberta. 👍
    2
  502.  @user-uu2rf8ev7z  Maybe so. Day 1 of new Trump Administration is probably green-lighting Keystone Pipeline. Is that consistent with your assessment of America?
    2
  503. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    2
  504.  @CavemanVanDweller  ^^ Get a real job. HS. Private American forests are the best managed in the world.
    2
  505. Too much sing-song in the voice.
    2
  506. What about Japan, and its promise to protect Taiwan?
    2
  507. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  508. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    2
  509. 👍👍👍🤞
    2
  510. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    2
  511. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    2
  512. Magnificent!
    2
  513. This is Peter Zeihan at his worst.
    2
  514. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    2
  515.  @boooju  Right. Show me a group of Americans that can come together and mass produce something like that in the time the Chinese did it.
    2
  516. you have to because the presentation is so poor, for whatever reason. the grad student should have all the lectures rehearsed instead. of winging it when needed. Easy to say, i know, but when you're paying "Stanford money" that's one of the things you should be getting.
    2
  517. In other words, this is a fluff piece.
    2
  518. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    2
  519. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    2
  520. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    2
  521.  @charleswomack2166  Wumaos?
    2
  522.  @mikeortiz1535  Safe to say that Toyota learns from these things. Odds are they'll this and make a fix. "The Fix" I prefer is simple vent controls: levers and wires only!
    2
  523. Ha! In other words, it's a BOONDOGGLE! Are you sure you're not a Trump supporter?
    2
  524. This is a clickbait title. "Fool me once...."
    2
  525. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    2
  526. Too much accent. Could you make a duplicate where a machine reads the text (PDF or MS Word) Thanks.
    2
  527. Same for all western European countries. Duhhh...
    2
  528.  @Zer0ne-Infinite  "Hey Sweden... How's the Femo-Fascist Multi-Culti working out?”
    2
  529. Federal Reserve inflation has screwed the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and defined-benefit pension plan (see real median income vs. GDP).
    2
  530. MAGA!
    2
  531.  @lincolnyaco5626  Yes -- I've heard of the Toba eruption 70k years ago. It was a "near extinction" event. But you wouldn't get that from this poorly constructed video. Sorry, but these guys get an F in communication.
    2
  532. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    2
  533. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  534. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    2
  535.  @jacksons1010  Who's the luddite now?
    2
  536. Is the graph at min 9:25 correctly scaled? It looks like "room temperature" at 50km altitude.
    2
  537. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  538. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    2
  539. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    2
  540. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  541. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    2
  542.  @bpbpbpbpbpbp  ? Ask your average California conservative what they think of the Sierra Club.
    2
  543.  @bpbpbpbpbpbp  ... What sane Californians think of tree huggers.
    2
  544. Can't stand the voice of the narrator. Is she in junior high?
    2
  545. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    2
  546.  @jaykanta4326  400 years of agriculture on Greenland is "regional"???? The glibness of answers like these is amazing. And anyway, "regional" does not answer the question.
    2
  547. Yes. Watch the Scott Kilmer videos for tons of feedback on auto repairability issues. (!)
    2
  548. Is there a moral to this story?
    2
  549. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    2
  550. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    2
  551.  @boRegah  HS. Renewables are a kid's lemonade stand business model. "Mommy and Daddy have to be there when the sun goes down."
    2
  552. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    2
  553. Less hand gesticulating please.
    2
  554. Can't understand the accent.
    2
  555. Any chance of voice being less "halting"? It's difficult to listen to.
    2
  556. This has a DEI, Columbia School of Journalism, highschool book report feel about it.
    2
  557. @SomeTrader74  "Renewable energy" is a kid's lemonade stand business model.
    2
  558. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    2
  559. "The Jack Ruby snipers"
    2
  560. Thank you. But too much accent and sing-song the voice. For what a good narration voice sounds like, see Peter Zeihan videos.
    2
  561. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    2
  562. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    2
  563.  @briancatt    Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    2
  564.  @SkeletalMisunderstanding  No. With all these white-coat PhDs, I expect better. ... Come on group. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    2
  565. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    2
  566.  @TerryBollinger  Very funny. ** Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? Your post says specific heat of Water, compared with co2 (I would assume that would be co2 Gas). I don't THINK you can compare specific heats of liquids and gas.
    2
  567. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for Thorium Molten Salt reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  568.  @manuelvazquez6399  When you say "China" you really mean the CCP, right?
    2
  569.  @DaleErnieMichael  Get a clue. I'm talking about CHINA, where this car is made, and it's hard-working people who put the rest of us to shame.
    2
  570.  @glossymouse7712  So? Asian people have proved over and over again that they may start out making something less than perfect, but they keep working at it 'til they get it right and end dominating the world. Critics of the makers of this car will probably end up eating their words. How many Americans do you know who can start with nothing and produce a credible car like this???
    2
  571. El Salvador has a Donald Trump for a President. Bravo!
    2
  572. Can't handle the voices and accents of many of these DIY vloggers.
    2
  573. Congratulations, Kash!
    2
  574. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    2
  575. Too much sing-song in the voice.
    2
  576. "Close enough for govt. work."
    2
  577. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    2
  578.  @HeZhenliangtintin186  Yes! The small town retiree needs something to get groceries in. Everybody wins. God bless.
    2
  579. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    2
  580.  @kebman  ?
    2
  581. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    2
  582.  @Will-xk4nm  If nothing else, you're good for my sense of self esteem.
    2
  583. 15 minutes in: pure cr*p. This man is an ignorant fool - does he even mention the CAUSE of the Great Depression? Namely, THE FEDERAL RESERVE? (Ditto for Subprime.) Dumb Dumb Dumb.
    2
  584. Is this guy a cshmuk or is it just me?
    2
  585. This is a clickbait title. "Fool me once...."
    2
  586. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    2
  587. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    2
  588. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    2
  589.  @heathclark318  Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    2
  590.  @JW-qf2fx  This makes me want to start a "Stupid Australia" playlist, to go with Stupid California and Stupid Canada.
    2
  591. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    2
  592. Is it a good idea to be showing the ship the Bradleys will be sailing on?
    2
  593. Smell the CCP shill shill.
    2
  594. What's the difference between Conscript and Mobilize?
    2
  595. Min 17:00 California all over again.
    2
  596. The hair, the set, and the gaudy jewelry makes this hard to take seriously.
    2
  597. Round numbers: 1) Ok, electricity is 4x more expensive to heat with the fossil fuel. 2) the electric heat pump produces 4x as much heat as consumed to extract it from the water. 3) so a big heat pump breaks even with fossil fuel, BEFORE spending several thousand dollars for the heat pump equipment and installation. "Next..."
    2
  598. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    2
  599.  @scottconcertman3423  Those days are long gone. You're following the footsteps of Detroit ... American ruins. Why bother visiting Roman ruins when you can see American ones in Detroit?
    2
  600. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    2
  601. Thank you for your comment. I take it you don't think THAT explosion came from something like overheated Christmas trees, right?
    2
  602. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    2
  603. Are there freer places than pre-CCP-aggression Hong Kong?
    2
  604.  @ArkhanTheBlind  https://youtube.com/c/ChinaUncensored
    2
  605.  @seetohey  Your CCP shilling will have you burning in hell.
    2
  606. "The circus that is western politics" We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: The Magic Sentences Of Liberty "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." The Democratic party specializes in Type 2 laws, that's why their leadership tends to be such bad people and psychopaths.
    2
  607. Phew -- you're application of the scientific method is terrific!
    2
  608. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    2
  609.  @RadioRich100  Solar Systems are about neighborhood bragging rights, paid with higher costs shifted-to/imposed-on the lower income peasantry.
    2
  610. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    2
  611. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    2
  612. What about NATO expansion when the Russians were promised otherwise?
    2
  613. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    2
  614. I wish you hadn't invoked the quackery if global warming.
    2
  615. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    2
  616. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    2
  617. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    2
  618. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    2
  619.  @dzzope  I'm sure the Chinese will be forthcoming about what the contents were (bound for the 'middle east".... "Christmas trees"... yeah right.
    2
  620. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    2
  621. I heard it this way: Don't chase the money... Let the money chase you. That's hard for most young people because they don't know what they're good at yet, so they have to make arbitrary choices. I "majored" in programming because there were lots of jobs in programming. "Wrong reason". You should find something that you are COMPETITIVE at, and it helps when you like what you're doing. If you're just doing it for the money, chances are you're not going to survive the competition (sorry, but that's the real world, that's Darwin in the workplace; if you have a manager that cuts you slack, or a work situation that's more like a work-at-home sole-proprietorship, then you might be alright). Professional (get paid for it) vs. amateurs (yes, I can do this, but casually, not competitively.)
    2
  622.  @ItsMe-yv9jd  It will go negative soon. The key is education of women (Jordan Peterson)
    2
  623.  @richardwilliams6920  ^^ The placebo effect of feel-goodery at work.
    2
  624.  @darinmeritt3790  Yes, they're worthless. How about sending them big missles that have a pre-programmed target wired into them, like the Kerch bridge. That could have been taken out permanently and early.
    2
  625.  @Gutenmorgenside  My guess is you don't have a real job.
    2
  626. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    2
  627. No, we have Donald Trump. ^^ He is our Taylor Swift.
    2
  628. Has this guy ever had a real job? Has the narrator?
    2
  629.  @rebeccaboudreau7589  Get a real job.
    2
  630. Sorry Matt -- not with you on this. Kristi knows more about dogs than you do. It's not like she "didn't try to train the dog." She did try and it wasn't responding the way her experience with young dogs indicated it should. She has the experience to determine that this one was an outlier -- and you DON'T have that experience. But yes, when it comes to the art of politics, this was "tone deaf". Uh boy.
    2
  631. Sorry, but A380 was an ego "tax-payer takes the risk" Euro-prestige boondoggle.
    2
  632.  @woodjohnn  ? 1) Abolish tenure 2) eliminate all subdies, scholarships, loans for any course that doesn't require a lab (they can do it online for cheap).
    2
  633. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    2
  634. Sorry, no -- like Ron DeSantis, he's laying the groundwork for 2028. He's 37. He'll be around in 2028, but Trump won't. It hurts him big-time if he were to attack Trump.
    2
  635. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    2
  636. No! Ethanol is NOT GASOLINE. ... But this video is clickbait.
    2
  637.  @blaster-zy7xx  I disagree. There are millions of people for whom this is a credible cheap transportation option. "More" in your frame of reference is past the point of diminishing returns, i.e., not necessary. The 2CV is sufficient transportation for millions.
    2
  638.  @blaster-zy7xx  The 2CV is not in production because of stupid emission/safety/mileage regulations. Without those, they could still be bought today and millions of people would have that as a transportation option. We can sidestep the EPA/DOT/DOE garbage by getting it designed as a motorcycle. PS: yes, the Beetle belongs back in production too, but "first things first". 2CV is the easiest and cheapest. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.
    2
  639. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    2
  640. Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    2
  641. We're supposed to go back to pulling rickshaws because of this long-winded crap?
    2
  642. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    2
  643. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    2
  644.  @gaseousFumes4u  Amen. It's a stupid boondoggle. ... might be interested in my other posts. (re: thorium-fission at 600 C vs. fusion at 10,000,000 C. )
    2
  645. Don't like the voice. Sounds like a used car salesman.
    2
  646. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    2
  647. They should give it a lottery system.
    2
  648.  @geonerd  Just set up a lottery ticket system.
    2
  649. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    2
  650. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    2
  651. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    2
  652. @J4Zonian  So what? 1) they are still a kids lemonade stand business (intermittent) 2) there is no such thing as anthropomorphic global warming.
    2
  653. It's too bad we make such a fetish out of saving energy - motivated by the quackery of "global warming", I might add. We have access to an essentially limitless supply of energy - Thorium. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi We develop and "calculator-ize" that instead.
    2
  654.  @jantschierschky3461  "Extreme weather" is the stupidest of GW hustles, because the statistics refuting it are so obvious and available.
    2
  655. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    2
  656. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    2
  657. " "Green energy" is kids lemonade stand energy. Re: baseload.
    2
  658. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    2
  659.  @rickv1007  Me too. One tax-supported quack tenured-professor wrote hype books on both global cooling and global warming.
    2
  660.  @gumdeo  Idiot Democrats created a vacuum filled by America's Tonton Macoute. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonton_Macoute
    2
  661. Is this a form of click bait????
    2
  662. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    2
  663. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    2
  664.  @Meton2526  I heard "nuclear" was a glorified razor blade business. Give them the plant, sell them the fuel.
    2
  665. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  666. This sounds like snake oil.
    2
  667. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    2
  668. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    2
  669.  @jordanwanberg753  Does anyone see how STUPID this is compared to thorium molten salt reactors? See the Kirk Sorenson videos. The Taxpayers deserve a refund for this 50 years of fusion boondoggle.
    2
  670.  @michellecullen8911  Does anyone see how STUPID this is compared to thorium molten salt reactors? See the Kirk Sorenson videos. The Taxpayers deserve a refund for this 50 years of fusion boondoggle.
    2
  671. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    2
  672.  @lukebyrd8406  $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    2
  673.  @jonb7470  $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    2
  674. @kaelhooten8468 I have an idea: let's strip out the copper used electric wiring and motor windings and bury back in the ground. You know -- sort of a "copper neutral" policy.
    2
  675. These COMMENTS are arresting.
    2
  676. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    2
  677.  @ReflectedMiles  Useful idiots? From Trump himself: "The worst people I've ever met are in politics". His supporters agree. Where does that put YOU?
    2
  678. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    2
  679.  @Kerrsartisticgifts  I suggest "Coalition Against Climate Crap".
    2
  680. Phew. Well done - thanks.
    2
  681. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    2
  682. Too much accent and up/down voice dramatics.
    2
  683. This is fascinating. Any chance you could run the same experiment with the towels being wet??? I know it's a bit of a stretch, but folks are making noise sheds for their backyard generators and they are naturally concerned about fire hazard. I'm just wondering if a few more decibels can be squeezed out of the towels if they were wet. What if soaked in some low-flamable oil, like glycerin???
    2
  684. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    2
  685. Min 4:50 Switchblade drones have 40 km range.
    2
  686. Why is a country as dirt poor as India making trips to the moon?
    2
  687. Sorry, but I think climate change is crap. For one, there were several BIG "climate changes" in the mere blink-of-an-eye window of recorded human history. One of them was the Medieval Warm Periods. Was that caused by SUVs? What's wrong with this picture? Here we have a PhD physicist who has to go back to the books for hour to investigate the science of what these snake-oil climate hustlers are saying (which I'm sure THEY haven't done). What she found was a shaggy dog story that has to go 3 levels deep, and THEN still ends with, "there still a lot of complications in this theory..." And at the end of it, I don't understand this "balance" stuff. Do any of YOU? It the space of two sentences we get "the earth has to get hotter because the stratosphere (beginning at 33,000 feet) got 1-2 degrees colder..." The politics of that are "Now! You peasants! Submit to a 25% reduction in your standard of living and pay up it taxes for trillions of dollars in stupid "green energy" BOONDOGGLES! (Ms. Sabin is German. Germany doesn't have such a good track record in the totality of "green energy" stuff -- either with its performance (see Peter Zeihan), or its making itself dependent on Russian natural gas.) How many of YOU understand this "balance" stuff? Climate change is 21st century superstition -- any bad weather event is YOUR FAULT because YOU drove that evil ICE. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    2
  688. Good! That means cheaper gasoline for the rest of us, right?
    2
  689. Call it "The Windmill Exclusion Zone".
    2
  690. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    2
  691.  @Alan_One1  I know. And Russia has a history of being brutalized by Europe. "Don't poke the Russian bear. See George Friedman and the Intermarium alliance strategy for central European security.
    2
  692. So, what is co2 besides glorified humidity?
    2
  693. Can't wait to watch the series! Sounds great.
    2
  694. Yes, millennial jumped-up over-caffeinated presentation.
    2
  695. This happened in the 70s.
    2
  696. "Gaza could be the next Singapore" Here's Alan Dershowitz making that comment (I don't know why Alan Dershowitz is a go-to guy for foreign policy, but in this case he makes "Adam Smith's" point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISViioLUy0I I agree with Alan because the only thing holding Gaza back from middle-class prosperity was Hamas. The never-had-a-real-job main stream media just talks about "the cycle of violence". On the other hand, Adam Smith says "Little is needed to raise a society to the height of opulence but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice ... all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things." If the IDF went in there, occupied Gaza, and administered it like Britain administered Hong Kong, then Gaza would become "the Singapore of the Middle East". Arabs are nothing if not enterprising. The only thing holding them back was Hamas. I bet after a generation or two, the IDF would say, "well, we're done here, it's time for us to go home." I bet even money that Gaza's newly comfortable middle class with a lot to lose will say, "No! Don't leave! The place will just be taken over by Hamas again and they'll trash the place."
    2
  697. LOL!
    2
  698. Watch Scott Kilmer for the reality of EPA-imposed eco-boost and turbo chargers.
    2
  699. Yes -- I've heard there are college course where you learn 1 new programming language every week.
    2
  700. Yes, ... but if you worked IBM equipment and the MVS operating system, "programming" was the least of it.
    2
  701. Not so if you're working with the MVS operating system, JCL, and IMS.
    2
  702. We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food -- it's a baseline.  Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.
    2
  703. Well done. Thanks.
    2
  704.  @serpentza  Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    2
  705. @andyandyandy360 Front loaders suck. See above.
    2
  706.  @decoratedveteran4915  He's FOS on several issues - inflation, "global warming", and populism. And THAT'S not good.
    2
  707.  @beezybeez4207  Everybody's an effing victim.
    2
  708. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    2
  709. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    2
  710.  @blucheer8743  The Germans are energy idiots. We'll find out this winter just how stupid their "green energy" is.
    2
  711.  @blucheer8743  Fair enough. Their energy decisions were political and they were stupid.
    2
  712. Too much drama in the audio.
    2
  713. Could you do one that compares nuclear with coal?
    2
  714. Is it enough money ? Can he get enough money to make the Wall effective using this route? The amount he has to spend is only about 10-20% of what he campaigned for. ????
    2
  715. Yes, WGAS about this clickbait video?
    2
  716.  @avil8686  ^^ thinks "Chinese" includes the creeps, thugs, and mass murderers of the CCP... good going.
    2
  717. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    2
  718. Sorry, I'm not getting this concept of of "collateral shortage". Not making sense to me. I'm seeing reverse repo as just a somewhat-desperate attempt to reduce money supply to quell inflation without raising interest rates. Where does collateral shortage come into it?
    2
  719.  @sinemacula1327  It makes sense to the debtors and speculators who are screwing the middle class out of purchasing power.
    2
  720. Go Trump! MAGA!
    2
  721. LOL!
    2
  722.  @Sven_Dongle  Yes - it looks like things can get "sloppy" at times, but that's part of its strength -- that you can even do that in the first place. Another name for "sloppy" is flexible. Try doing that with IMS.
    2
  723.  @Sven_Dongle  I'm celebrating the existence of SQL (especially in comparison to IMS!). Please spare me your pedantic, obnoxious lectures. ... then go back to watching Big Bang Theory.
    2
  724.  @Sven_Dongle  No, the difference is you're a typical social computer geek.
    2
  725. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    2
  726. Don't like the anti-Trump attitude.
    2
  727.  @nickbestevaar  It's trivial, and it can be reprocessed.
    2
  728. Such a load of kurapp.
    2
  729. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    2
  730. Phew.
    2
  731. Yes. Thank you for having the patience to talk sense to these aggressive self serving climate quacks.
    1
  732. DIY solar: LOOK MA! NO HANDS! Are you playing the SOLAR-AS-STATUS-SYMBOL game too? I'm sure that plays well with the Starbucks crowd. This is well-documented behavior: when apes have extra time on their hands, they engage in "improving status" -- now play the ape noises Tim Allen makes. Thorstein Veblin wrote a famous book about this called Theory Of The Leisure Class.
    1
  733. Don't give me that millennial CRAP! 1) that's a stupid assumption ("some"), 2) it's stupid to even insinuate that the DEGRADATION of traffic flow is somehow compensated for less cars. Don't insult my intelligence.
    1
  734. Yeah, because that's all they can/could afford -- that's not the same as degrading the pedestrian and motorist infrastructure now that they can afford better.
    1
  735. Flinx -- in other words, people were better off when they were poorer -- you sound like Mao himself. Gee -- tell them they should all go back to bike riding, especially in the rain!
    1
  736. In this video they are on city sidewalks making life HELL for pedestrians and motorists! ! ! I hope you get hit by one next time you go.
    1
  737. Right... making life HELL for pedestrians and motorists --- great going!
    1
  738. Anything new from the Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown con artists?
    1
  739. 5000 years ago you could walk across the Alps in a short sleeve shirt. That's because the Egyptians were burning too much diesel fuel to build their pyramids.
    1
  740. How are the bananas of climate quackery and solar-than-thou status symbols tonight?
    1
  741. This is either self evident, or fly paper for boorish lowlives: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights.
    1
  742. This is a hangout for Starbucks poseurs and would-be climate enforcement thugs.
    1
  743. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  744. !
    1
  745. Too bad the camera doesn't just stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only the audio is necessary from the speaker. The visual is distracting.
    1
  746. These people are obnoxious leftist plutocrats with self righteous "sustainability". There's a silver lining in the patent sharing and that's spreading the cost of "quick charge" filling stations.
    1
  747. +Yoyo Ma Right on, Yoyo.
    1
  748. +afa1515 We are in democracy's lawless, unprincipled, unconstitutional stage: Try this for first principles instead of listening to that stupid Starbucks theme song for the millionth time: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  749. Here is the root of income inequality, chronic 3rd world poverty, declining living standards and a contributor to labor instability, low birth rates, social disintegration, substance abuse: X Marks The Spot—-Wages Started Losing When The Dollar Was Delinked From Gold In 1971 http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/x-marks-the-spot-wages-started-losing-when-the-dollar-was-delinked-from-gold-in-1971/ ...and the flip side of this evil coin: fractional reserve banking, and its enabler, the Federal Reserve. George Friedman's "rethinking of economics " means abolishing central banking and ITS enabler, legal tender laws, and replacing it with market-selected money. (not necessarily gold, but that's what the market ends up selecting as money.)
    1
  750. Recycling is a re religious ritual imposed by a state-established religion.
    1
  751. +hettygreene "Eco Paganism"
    1
  752. Have you considered requiring people wear corks?
    1
  753. Bullsh#t. Solar is Kid's Lemonade Stand play-acting. Do any of these GEE WHIZ solar troubadours figure the cost of REAL ESTATE in their song and dance? Kids Lemonade Strands, at taxpayer expense? anyone?
    1
  754. "Buy my snake oil and you can feel smarter and better than everybody else!" That's the pseudo-religious crap these hustlers are selling.
    1
  755. Ladies and gentleman, this is how human sacrifice based on superstition gets started. The sociologists should be studying and documenting this.
    1
  756. The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property."
    1
  757. Great for people on their feet all day! ! ! ! Hospitals and retail take note!
    1
  758. Watch out folks: - the quacks and thugs of global warming are working hard to turn their "peer reviews" into a form of legislature - a dictatorship of quacks, which our opportunist politicians are all too happy to take advantage of, - the thugs of quack-science global warming are on their way to SCREW the middle class, with their taxes and regulations.
    1
  759. What a stupid idea, based on a stupid premise.
    1
  760. +HomeSkillenSLICE Why do you waste your time spinning this gee wiz crap?
    1
  761. +Hexyl Cinnamal Solar is a disgusting subsidy to the idle rich for a Kids Lemonade Stand business.
    1
  762. +m1aws ??? Solar subsidy schemes make people poorer. is that your point?
    1
  763. +m1aws That is a function of the crime of inflation. http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/x-marks-the-spot-wages-started-losing-when-the-dollar-was-delinked-from-gold-in-1971/
    1
  764. THANK YOU PROFESSOR !
    1
  765. LOL!
    1
  766. Too bad the videographer does such a poor job. Thousands of people could be getting a good intro to Chem E if somebody had noticed early on what a poor job was being done and easy it was to fix with a few words of advice, e.g. put the camera on what Professor Robertson is talking TO, not the professor himself.
    1
  767. Have you "climate change" bullies quacks and losers heard if the Ice Age? Did you know there have been 20 "ice ages" (periods of glaciation) in the part of earth history? No? You haven't? And you expect the rest of to take your thuggish quackery at face value? Go get a real job, you stupid losers!
    1
  768. Can't guys like this learn to COMPLETE THEIR SENTENCES in interviews ? ? ? They truncate their sentences like they're some sort of British royalty hoyty toyty.
    1
  769. "Protesters" ... yeah right. CNN wonders why their ratings stink.
    1
  770. No, batteries aren't "the problem" because the is no "problem", except the hardships to be imposed by the climate and solar quacks.
    1
  771. +Alex James You are an overgrown spoiled child with too much time on your hands.
    1
  772. +Alex James Oh really? "Everyone" could be making more money if the just followed your school-boy science-class fantasies about rinky-dink solar? Gee! Have you advertised yourself as a consultant?
    1
  773. +Alex James REMOVE THE SUBSIDIES. How many times do I have to remind you of that turd in your punchbowl?
    1
  774. +enator71 Right. Greener-than-thou BRAGGING RIGHTS for the wealthy, while costs are shifted to the rest of us. Solar Sucks!
    1
  775. +Alex James It's an armchair entrepreneur, kids lemonade stand, schoolboy science project. See the Thorium videos by Kirk Sorenson a serious energy solution.
    1
  776. +Alex James No, YOU read up it. Read up on the cost shifting to poor people with that stupid Net Metering. Read up on the German renewables, anti-nuke Double Whammy fiasco and how that's working out.
    1
  777. +Alex James Spend your own money on your dipshit science projects.
    1
  778. +enator71 "can't happen without subsidy" <--- your embrace of climate quackery has made you un-American.
    1
  779. +enator71 Was I talking to you about the Vermont Germany-in-the making solar nuclear fiasco ?
    1
  780. +m1aws This is someone who has done zero Thorium investigation.
    1
  781. +Alex James You're an ignorant blowhard whi drank too much climate quack cool aid : 1) see the Kirk Sorensen talk on nuclear waste 2) I'm opposed to subsidies, but if a fraction of that stupid solar subsidy was spent on Thorium, we'd have it by. Instead the money is pissed away on these disgusting cost shifting school boy science projects, for the benefit of rich kid Starbucks pontificators .
    1
  782. +m1aws See the Kirk Sorensen videos, you armchair Monday morning quarterback.
    1
  783. +m1aws What a stupid comment. Only someone ignorant of the thorium movement would make it.
    1
  784. +m1aws Not ok when it comes to blowhard climate quacks like yourself peddling imposing quack solar through political means and pissing away capital that could be spent developing thorium, privately. You are an obstacle to human progress.
    1
  785. +m1aws The reason we have have stupid conversations like this is because blowhards like you can't keep to minding your own business and trying to impose a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us.
    1
  786. +m1aws "A" YouTube video? That's a stupid comment. There are dozen of Thorium videos, many over an hour long, including at least 5 different TED speakers on the subject. Stick to your backyard bragging rights and your solar-than-thou conceits.
    1
  787. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps!
    1
  788. +David Foster Crap.
    1
  789. +Marko Crush Look at these two ninkompoops having their religious wars over TRIVIA, which what the whole hysteria over co2 is too.
    1
  790. +Marko Crush Spare us your school-boy science project mating display crap.
    1
  791. This is a hangout for Starbucks poseurs and would-be climate enforcement thugs.
    1
  792. Can you believe this crap? We're supposed to be better off because the "near shore" got sediment?
    1
  793. This idiot has a PhD in Climate Quackology.
    1
  794. Right. This crop of hustlers and liars think their stupid computer models are evidence. Maybe they grew up on computer games and confuse that with reality.
    1
  795. +KKuurus Right K. How many scandals of data falsification have there been? And these idiots still tow the party line. Sites like these are where the lowest dregs of climate quackery and hustle reside.
    1
  796. co2 is climate trivial, at most. co2 is beneficial to plant life ("crops") co2 is measured in 300-600 ppm (Parts Per MILLION), or 0.03 % of the atmosphere - i.e. a trace gas climate is always changing. given the climatological trivialness of co2, the is plenty of reason to believe co2 increases are an effect - not cause - of warming. if there is an option, warming is preferable to cooling. This is a hack political hustle advanced by opportunists and "useful idiots".
    1
  797. Maybe it's TOO EXPENSIVE... or does that nuisance detail never enter the feel good conversation ?
    1
  798. +bluephreakr Sure! And if money grew on trees we wouldn't have to work. The "let them eat cake" attitude of these Starbucks intellectuals is disgusting.
    1
  799. +bluephreakr It's the solar quacks and their Kids Lemonade Stand business that are delusional. Solar is the "radical chic" of the era.
    1
  800. +m1aws "Coal is a small part of electric generation" ??? You are a fool.
    1
  801. +diceman199 "We need better storage methods " How profound! Why didn't I think of that? Why don't you get your t two-faced politicians and quack scientists to launch a national campaign tax effort to "get better storage methods"... what could be wrong with that?
    1
  802. Does this feel-good infomercial mention the tax subsidies this privileged industry gets? (tax subsidies = cost shifting to poor people; poor people pay higher electricity bills because of solar cost shifting subsidies)
    1
  803. The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." The Democratic party specializes in Type 2 laws, that's why they tend to be such bad people and psychopaths.
    1
  804. Bravo! Wow... could the NY restaurant experience be improved with these!
    1
  805. Have these stupid climate quacks ever wondered why the change in CO2 concentration from 0.000200 to 0.000400 could cause such a catastrophe? In percentage terms it's 0.02% to 0.04% increase on CO2 concentration. Big Deal! In parts per 1,000,000 it's gone from 200 parts per million to 400 parts per million, and it's had no provable effect on climate, only conjecture and assertion, easily contradicted by observation, e.g. The Little Ice Age, no change in temp lately, Viking settlements in Greenland, 20 periods of glaciation, The Maunder Minimum etc etc Of course, if you're an effeminate Starbucks twerp looking to get laid with some cheap pick up conversation about how "environmentally sensitive" and "sustainable" then maybe you do buy into the quackery of global warming if it helps you get laid.
    1
  806. +Stephen Nielsen Please explain the equivalence of iodine and co2, you obnoxious pseudo-science schmuck.
    1
  807. +Stephen Nielsen Please explain the relevance of "in your body" vs "in the atmosphere" you obnoxious pseudo-science schmuck.
    1
  808. +Stephen Nielsen Oooooo... look at heap-big science geek Stephen! He's the obnoxious prick with all the answers in the quack-science "debate" of global warming. Advice: test your quack-science assertions by joining a polar bear on a stranded ice berg and build a "carbon neutral" fire on it.
    1
  809. +Donald Kasper Yes indeed! Don't these sanctimonious pricks and their "sustainable" make you sick?
    1
  810. +Stephen Nielsen Your iodine consumption is showing.
    1
  811. +Donald Kasper Yes Kadsper! Climate Quackery is 21st century superstition - pure and simple, not science.
    1
  812. +Donald Kasper Yes, the Climate Quacks are trying to set themselves up as a priesthood with control over the god-sacrifices they want to impose on the rest of us - those disgusting little pieces of sht opportunists. Welcome to 21st century quack shamanism, in the name of science, to add insult to injury. Burn in hell - you classroom dipshts!
    1
  813. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Maunder Minimum? Little Ice Age? Roman Warm Period? (that happened because the Romans had chariots and their horses farted when the had races.) Quack quack... 20 periods of glaciation ("ice ages")? "C02 sinks" (a k a plants) Catastrophe! CO2 concentration goes from 0.000200 to 0.000400 . Run for your life! Quack quack... Quack quack...
    1
  814. +Stephen Nielsen Yes. They are the 8th-grade-simple refutations of climate quack "consensus" with their dipsht quack models masquerading as science, you obnoxious pompous-ass piece of sht.
    1
  815. +Stephen Nielsen Like the con artist quack you are, you comletely miss the point(s). Was the roman warm period the result of chariots and farting horses? Did the last ice age recede because of farting mastodons . Global warming to a twerp like +Stephen Nielsen is like a harassment suit - putting the burden of proof on the defendant , in typical tax-supported fashion.
    1
  816. +Stephen Nielsen PS: you are a smug little piece of sht , posturing behind the demagoguery of quack science.
    1
  817. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 CO2 is a trivial GHG, and an effect, not a cause of warming. Go grind your obnoxious self serving quack ax elsewhere, you aggressive twerp.
    1
  818. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 "The influence of GHG is 10 times more powerful" It's disgusting to think our hard earned standard of living is under attack by by these smug little creeps. And this is what an utterly corrupt, hijacked, and 6-showings-of-that-stupid-Inconvenient Truth government school system can do to a whole generation of would-be state jackboot thugs.
    1
  819. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- These are the smug little twerps their cost-shifting subsidized "renewables" who want to reduce your standard of living (aka impoverish you) ... all in the name of a quack-science ideology.
    1
  820. +Stephen Nielsen You're not remotely related to science. Your are a smug little climate hustler like Al Sharton is a race hustler. +Stephen Nielsen <-- Climate Hustler. Hope you're proud of your "work", you lowlife opportunist piece of crap.
    1
  821. +Stephen Nielsen You are an obnoxious would-be hardship imposing smug piece of crap. Get a real job instead of the disgusting scare monging shakedown you're trying to make a living at, you obnoxious twerp. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the self-serving scum being produced in our tax-funded "universities". Cut off their funding!
    1
  822. +Stephen Nielsen You are a quack salesman hustling for a piece if the climate quack shakedown action - i.e. a despicable Sharptonesque piece of crap, probably tax-mommy supported too. Cut off the funding of these creeps and hustlers!
    1
  823. +Stephen Nielsen Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack Cut off the funding for these creeps and charlatans! Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack
    1
  824. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Nothing compared to the degradation your type wants to inflict on humanity. Cut off the funding for these quacks, charlatans and creeps! ! ! Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack
    1
  825. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Figure it out yourself you smug little cost shifting piece of shit.
    1
  826. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Look in mirror, you stupid shit.
    1
  827. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Spare me the professional-victim quackery and look it yourself, you smug self serving piece of shit.
    1
  828. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Because you're too much of an ignorant immoral quack yourself. You don't try to reason with idiots. The refutations of gw quackery is all over the internet, but you're the kind of aggressive opportunist turd that tries to use it for personal gain, like a sleazebag lawyer - the OJ Simpson defense attorneys. Get a real job, you parasitical low life piece of crap. Meanwhile, Cut off the funding for these quacks, charlatans and creeps! Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack
    1
  829. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, and smug twerps!
    1
  830. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps!
    1
  831. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- This dirtbag is an example of the sense of entitlement bred into obmoxious twerps in the state-funded education system. i.e. get good at slinging oppressive something-or-other around (in this case climate quackery) that be used to levy a whole new layer of tax hardship on society, and presto! you've got yourself a cushy boondoggle career, which you were entitled to in the first place because you were the smartest in the class. That's why the funding for these pricks should be cut off - the sooner the better.
    1
  832. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- Thinks the world is one big classroom and he gets to dictate a lower standard of living on the rest of based on his quack science. INDIA HERE WE COME.
    1
  833. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 And you're an elitist piece of shit bent on imposing hardships on everyone while skimming a piece of the action for yourself.
    1
  834. +David Foster <--- gives lessons on how to sound important and hear yourself talk, all the being a hellish negative to the human condition - like the creeps and turds of communism glibly extolling the virtues of police states.
    1
  835. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- full of important sounding crap.
    1
  836. +David Foster Figures you aggressive climate thugs would be hanging out here in quack echo chamber. How's the air conditioning in the quack bunker? Is it a good place for making your self important fantasy plans for imposing your human sacrifices on the rest of us in the name of your quack science superstition?
    1
  837. +David Foster It's appropriate you mention teenagers because a bright teenager can easily punch holes in the quackery of global warming, no matter how many times he's had Inconvenient Truth rammed down his throat be the would be inquisition administrators like you and thug you hang out with in this gay bar of climate quackery.
    1
  838. +hettygreene ...BY the would be ....
    1
  839. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- confirming the obnoxious elitism motivating the climate quacks. They are bad people, through and through, simple as that.
    1
  840. I hope you're an academic or loaf on trust fund - that would provide context for the crap, quackery and elitism you peddle. Otherwise, it's heartbreaking to think an ahole like you got that way on free will.
    1
  841. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You're a fool. My guess is you have a trust fund.
    1
  842. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You're like that stupid Kennedy... THAT'S what trust funds do to people.
    1
  843. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Do yourself and the world a favor and go get a real job - anything, as long as it's honest work. Cleaning toilets world have more dignity and worth than the sleazy existence you live now.
    1
  844. +David Foster And all YOU can think about is power.
    1
  845. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 No, in your case you're a sleazy doofus who would be better off doing honest work as opposed to the lowlife existence you lead now.
    1
  846. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 I know you'd be a better human being cleaning toilets than the lowlife life you lead now.
    1
  847. +David Foster Don't let me interrupt your climate quack echo chamber mutual admiration society.
    1
  848. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You don't know shit about human rights. You are it's enemy.
    1
  849. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You're turning Starbucks into a Munich beer hall.
    1
  850. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 The topic is the disgusting spectacle called "your life", making both you and the rest of the world a better place if all you did was get a job cleaning toilets.
    1
  851. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 The topic is you making the world a better place by cleaning toilets.
    1
  852. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 It's in the misbegotten evil of your DNA.
    1
  853. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 That's because this is where the dregs of climate quackery hang out. Here's where you'd find scumbags like Michael Mann. My being here is like a straight guy in a gay bar, or a Jew in a Munich beer hall.
    1
  854. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 It's a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it.
    1
  855. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Who pays for the quack being interviewed ?
    1
  856. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You eat shit.
    1
  857. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 ... exposing the self regarding conceit behind these quack movements.
    1
  858. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You're no longer worth the time to insult.
    1
  859. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You are a lowlife piece of shit.
    1
  860. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You and your self serving climate quacks are living standards, humanity reducing pigs.
    1
  861. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 just pasding through... That's like paying people to dig holes and fill them in, you stupid shit.
    1
  862. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Add "economic" to your list of idiocies.
    1
  863. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- Boondoggles-r-Us. Notice the glibness with which this carbon quack spends other people's money (taxes) like the stupid piece of crap human being he is.
    1
  864. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 You live in world of such childish fantasies that, like I said, you and the world would be better off if you got a real job cleaning toilets.
    1
  865. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  866. Anything new from Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown power grabbers?
    1
  867. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  868. Where do people get this crap?
    1
  869. +ben nichols Maunder Minimum = Little Ice Age. Try discussing that with these GW quacks.
    1
  870. +ben nichols Keep saying that Ben. These GW quacks need to be de-programmed.
    1
  871. +Stephen Nielsen Co2 concentration is already several (tens?) times higher than the .00x percent in atmosphere, you stupid schmuck.
    1
  872. Where do you get crap like that? Where were the co2 Quacks in 70s when everybody was upset about COOLING? Co2 is trivial. Find another hobby horse mirror to admire yourself in.
    1
  873. +Stephen Nielsen <--- FACT: is a blowhard climate quack thug with an empty life acting out his stupid aggressions using trivial, superstitious, junk science propaganda. Go find another mole hill to make a self justifying mountain out of, you schmuck.
    1
  874. +Chester Finecat The only thing "significantly degrading the planet" is crap coming out of people like you. Meanwhile, stick a cork up your elitist ass or get a carbon offset fine, you quack-science piece if crap.
    1
  875. You idiots (and the world) would be better off cleaning toilets than spreading the junk science crap you do now.
    1
  876. +Andrew Don't listen to these mirror gazing koolaid drinking schmucks. Cut off the tax funding to these quacks and they'll go get real jobs. CLEANING TOILETS would be more honorable than the lowlife existences they lead now.
    1
  877. Pompous a--. I hate this smug preaching based on Carbon and Climate Quackery.
    1
  878. Excess carbon from cavemen campfires caused the last ice age glaciers to melt. As for the 20 periods of glaciation before that? I don't know... maybe it was farting mastodons that caused the glaciers to melt.
    1
  879. These are the Red Guards of a pagan religion.
    1
  880. That's because "climate change " fka "global warming" is a crock. Bill nye is a performer. as a scientist he's a quack. Sarah Palin was right about him.
    1
  881. +Bmw EM Yes. I'm convinced the only way to do that is cut off their funding.
    1
  882. +Uriah Graves Global warming is quackery and crap, hysteria, superstition and politics, but NOT science. just look around. Bob Carter for one destroys it. there's a movie out called Climate Hustle. BTW, farting mastodons caused the 20 warming periods between the periods of glaciation ("ice ages") right?
    1
  883. +MaximvsDread Yeah, he's just a tv showman who drank too much coolaid and now wants to be a Gore-ish high priest of climate quackery. .... similar to other demagogues and plutocrats in this stupid movement.
    1
  884. +David Foster Hey creepo! Watch out for farting mastodons -- 20 times their farting melted the continental ice sheets of glaciation periods!
    1
  885. A little too fast too singsongy too "oh isn't this so fun easy and sesame street simple", but still very good. would be better with less giddy attempt at being cool.
    1
  886. !
    1
  887. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark),.
    1
  888. Off Grid = Status Symbol: LOOK MA! NO HANDS!
    1
  889. +Steve chester You sound like the climate-quack equivalent of the snake oil salesman or the hand waving magician.
    1
  890. +Steve chester You and your spoiled millenials are working up a lather of victimhood over the stupid climate quackery to absolve yourself of responsibility and breed a sense of entitlement, al la Al Sharpton.
    1
  891. You are a spoiled twerp.
    1
  892. +Daisy Daze You should qualify that some, more like YOU are a human failure, with a disgusting entitlement attitude to prove it.
    1
  893. +Kim A Well said Kim. Each generation is "progressively" less American and more obnoxious. Where do these idiots get their crap? Govt school systems. Some teachers have spoken on this very thread. Talk about "pollution".
    1
  894. Anyone know Bill's educational background?
    1
  895. Did anyone see Sarah Palin guffawing (rightly) about Bill Nye being a "scientist" ?
    1
  896. Here come the Red Guards of atmosphere control. This is intra-species Darwinism - the attack of the aggressive in the passive. This time their excuse is fraudulent, self-evidently false claims of the Carbon Quacks. This is what 100 years of government controlled and slave-funded education has brought us to. It's not just a shame, it's an attack on our existence by bad people. It will get worse unless something is done. It will take more than elections to beat back this (these) attacks on your life liberty and property.
    1
  897. Tell those stupid climate quacks "do you want to experience of real greenhouse gas? Spend the night in the desert without a sleeping bag.
    1
  898. I know this takes all the superiority fun and self importance out of climate quackery, but here goes: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights.
    1
  899. Solar is a Kids Lemonade Stand boondoggle for rich kids who don't want to do the work of a real job.
    1
  900. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  901. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  902. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  903. +Steven Bee Your idea of science are those those stupid spreadsheet "models" you want to jerk everybody around with.
    1
  904. JR? This is 11232. over. :)
    1
  905. +Steve Dekker Thank you Steve. I submit that the reason we're required to engage in these stupid conversations in the first place is because the climate quacks and hustlers can't keep to minding your own business and are trying to impose taxes, hardships, and a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Here are the first principles the climate quacks violate: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  906. Should we hope the coup succeeds? What's going to happen next if it doesn't? Does Turkey turn ISIS ?
    1
  907. Do fall for this climate quackery.
    1
  908. Sing songy voice.
    1
  909. This woman is an argumentative thug.
    1
  910. "Geopolitics" is an insult to the middle class. Try this for first principles: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  911. Who is this blowhard rich kid pompous twerp?
    1
  912. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  913. +Donald Kasper Right on Donald. The Education establishment has hijacked a whole generation on this GW crap - turned them into Red Guards, parental informants, and Hitler Youth.
    1
  914. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps! Meanwhike, Liberty is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. The climate quacks want to tax you out of a piece of your standard of living by taxing your energy consumption, which mean they want to be skim off oil profits, like OPEC, so essentially IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC.
    1
  915. +Rand Huso Are you really that much of a schmuck?
    1
  916. +Rand Huso What caused the Little Ice Age?
    1
  917. +Rand Huso "regional effect" .... talk about meely-mouth double talk.... What does "regional effect" mean? Only the northern latitudes? Whatever it means, how does this pompous know it all know that? Were they collecting climate data in Peru in the 15th century? Don't play this stupid game with these climate quack idiots. Cut off their tax funding and then they'll shut up.
    1
  918. +Rand Huso <--- can't see the forest for the trees.
    1
  919. +steve chester That's a stupidly rhetorical question. "politicians"? which ones? all of them? you are a pathetic examples of the schmuckiness of the climate quack crowd.
    1
  920. +Rand Huso Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  921. Anyone care to explain the Maunder Minimum?
    1
  922. This is a borderline schmucky infomercial.
    1
  923. The quackery peddled by the GW bullies isn't science. Science is the proving of hypothesis through experimentation. (aka The Scientific Method) Therefore, on many levels the GW quackery is prima facie wrong. For example: man-caused-CO2 causes GW. Scientifically this is false, because there is no evidence of CO2 CAUSING GW, only some flimsy-at-best statistical Correlation of the two. Correlation is not causation. Therefore the so-called science of GW isn't science at all. It is old fashioned snake oil quackery.
    1
  924. +Et234 Gtt5456 Yes, these are conceited, self regarding, power seeking -holes.
    1
  925. +Et234 Gtt5456 Yes, these are conceited, self regarding, power seeking -holes.
    1
  926. Has Mr. Cold Fusion ponied up and "bought" one of these?
    1
  927. +Daniel Jr I know, that's why i quoted "bought". I still ask the question if this tax subsidy cheerleader put his money where his mouth is.
    1
  928. Pure crap. Please spare me the lecture, sex-on-the-beach boy. No -- every car company does Not get the same credits, and if it did it would still be a screwing of the tax payer. Get a real job and start paying taxes yourself.
    1
  929. +Daniel Jr Hey sex-on-the-beach-boy, you speak like a spoiled kid, so at the most fundamental level, I repeat what your basic problem is: go get a real job, meeting real consumer demand, paying real taxes, then come talk to me about your feel good, welfare for the rich schemes.
    1
  930. +Daniel Jr "corporate finance": there's the ultimate welfare for the rich racket - called the Fed.
    1
  931. +Daniel Jr Your an obnoxious schemer of things to do with other people's money. If electric cars entertain you, YOU pay for them yourself. Don't try to shift the cost onto someone else, you creep.
    1
  932. And you call yourself a financial analyst? Echch! ! ! ! http://www.wsj.com/articles/hey-jay-leno-what-about-teslas-dependence-on-the-taxpayer-1466201286 ....... http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/the-tesla-3-scam-an-answer-to-elon-musks-snow-job/ And as for self-rightious moral superiority, that knows no age limit, but does emminate more from the big-mouth know-it-all rich kid schmucks, especially on blogs like this, on dippy feel-good infomercials like this.
    1
  933. Your "modling work"? LOL --- that fits with the self-regarding nature of your whole shtick, and the people on these obnoxious I'm-smarter-than-you feel-good-at-other-people's-expense videos like this.
    1
  934. You're somewhat right about the name-calling -- "It's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it." .................. .............. .. ON the other hand, superficially altruistic people like you are actually monstrously aggressive -- you just get somebody else to do the dirty work (who might that be?). So who's worse? A name-caller complaining about aggression being inflicted? Or the person committing the aggression?
    1
  935. YES ! !
    1
  936. "Solar... Toys for the affluent." David Stockman
    1
  937. What happened? i cantt believe it! God Bless!
    1
  938. "Renewables" is just another dimension for the creeps who play the stupid game of politics, to wit: I submit that the reason we're required to engage in these stupid conversations in the first place is because the climate quacks and hustlers can't keep to minding your own business and are trying to impose taxes, hardships, and a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Here are the first principles the climate quacks violate: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  939. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  940. No. The ocean is basic to start with, not acidic.
    1
  941. +Simon WoodburyForget Please go lock yourself in the nearest Starbucks and throw away the key. There you can spew your "let them eat cake" idiocies to echo chamber approval of your fellow elitists.
    1
  942. Yeah! That's where those foolish Germans are going to end up as a result of their "renewables" fiasco. Typical govt-hysteria-driven screwup.
    1
  943. +Fizzwerth o_O So what? Are salmon more important than people? By the pagan-animist values of sites like this, they are. These are bad people.
    1
  944. +Jason Deveau Stupid comment. The renewable idiots of Germany are rushing to coal plants to plug the holes left by nuclear and the wishful thinking of solar.
    1
  945. Public Schools radicalize clueless juveniles for Climate Quackery the way Saudi madrasses radicalize for ISIS jihad.
    1
  946. Try this for first principles: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  947. Relax. You've been duped by hustlers and quacks .
    1
  948. Where do YOU get off with the "we must do something " bullying crap? Ladies and gentleman, this is how human sacrifice based on superstition gets started. The sociologists should be studying and documenting this.
    1
  949. +Allen Fogarty What a stupid self important fantasy. Where do people get this crap? Answer: there's always a market to feed a cheap sense if superiority, and now the government is subsidizing the industry with its quack science and superstition.
    1
  950. +sdkee Colder (!) , mostly b c there war a period of glaciation, Montreal under a mile of ice - incredible, right. Of course, all that ice melted because mastodons did a lot of farting.
    1
  951. +cgm778 Solar is a boondoggle for conceited people who don't want to do the hard work of making an honest living. It's a looser without screwing the taxpayer with subsidies.
    1
  952. +MrAnchorman123 If solar is so great, remove all those goddamn subsidies, starting with that disgusting Net Metering, which shifts cost to poor people. Solar is a stupidly self indulgent Kids Lemonade Stand "lifestyle" type of business.
    1
  953. +OohzyJohnDow Absolute elitist, clueless nonsense! It's simple but toxic to elitist liberals: if solar is so great, it doesn't need subsidies. But it's Not so great, and it needs the stupidly maligned "grid" to come in and take up the slack when - surprise surprise - Night comes. Solar is an intelligence-insulting kid's lemonade stand business.
    1
  954. +OohzyJohnDow That's right, you live in a childish communalist fantasy, as opposed to a market reality. And in attempting to impose your John Lennon Starbucks fantasies on the rest of us, impose hardship, unhappiness, and suffering instead. You are an aggressive, evil person.
    1
  955. +OohzyJohnDow See what's going on in Germany for the solar fiasco, rising prices, cost shifting to lower middle class, frantic replacement of nuclear plants with coal. i.e. sheer Kids Lemonade Stand stupidity.
    1
  956. +OohzyJohnDow Spare me your self regarding, self serving, 'Im so great' sermons.
    1
  957. +OohzyJohnDow You luxuriate and mirror gaze at other people's expense.
    1
  958. +OohzyJohnDow Not knowing that is another of your shortcomings.
    1
  959. +Minuteman You're not getting it. "Renewables" are a Kids Lemonade Stand play-business that is paid for by working class cost shifting. Support that political rip off and you are a bad person.
    1
  960. +topflight408 You are celebrating evil. The "happy solar people" are SCREWING the non solar people with the tax subsidies, cost shifting, and that Disgusting Net Metering! If you to play earth boy Kids Lemonade Stand, DO IT WITH YOUR OWN MONEY, you schmuck.
    1
  961. +topflight408 "Thou shalt not steal". Sounds pretty simple me, you obnoxious self righteous idiot. BTW, if it's so cheap, remove the subsidies, you creep.
    1
  962. +topflight408 I think you should change your name from Topflight to LowLife. If the Founding Fathers could only hear your asinine comments about taxes over something as foolish and quack-science as "solar", they'd think people like you aren't worth the effort.
    1
  963. +OohzyJohnDow You live in the echo chamber of your full-of-crap fantasies subsidized by poor people.
    1
  964. +topflight408 In your characteristically blind following of the pagan superdtitionist narrative, you neglect to account for these companies bilking the taxpayer through the stupid solar subsidies, just like the sainted Elon Musk. They are doing it to make money. Without the ripoff poor-screwing subsidies, they don't do. You are a mighty, dangerous fool.
    1
  965. +John Benton How do you pack so many stupid statements into such a small space?
    1
  966. +John Benton No, on the contrary, your stupid sarcasm is so thick you can cut its elitism with a knife. You were encouaged in this obnoxious attitude by twerps like Jon Stewart, who are neither funny nor wise. and neither are you, or your mirror gazing disgusting conceit.
    1
  967. +topflight408 Yes, there are several on this sleazy mirror gazing hangout who have the patience and depth to talk sense to you idiots, and I have nothing but respect for them . I don't have the patience to speak in depth to you disgusting idiots, one reason being that a bright teenager can overturn the childish quack science of solar a solar and global warming, so I lose patience very quickly.
    1
  968. +CNCmachiningisfun Then why are you here promoting this crap?
    1
  969. +topflight408 <--- is in the solar installation business, profiteering off taxes on poor people. Anything self serving here?
    1
  970. +enator71 Is that in percentage terms?
    1
  971. +CNCmachiningisfun Hi CNC - my happy hobbyist. it's me again. Do you include the 'cost' of your labor in your diy-energy efforts? Or no? By the same token, do you pay yourself in solar-than-thou bragging rights? Do you count the cost the rest of us have to pay in listening to that crap since we're forced to come to idiot-blogs like this and defend ourselves against the onslaught of the climate quacks and solar hustlers?
    1
  972. +CNCmachiningisfun .... and I forgot the a couple other things about solar: does the real estate for it come for free? Do the panels have to be cleaned and is that labor provided by slaves? do you have to pay higher property insurance premiums. if there's a hail storm, will your insurance cover the damage? if it's so great, and it adds value to your house, will your liberal for-the-children property taxes go up?
    1
  973. +CNCmachiningisfun No, you get off the genteel bragging rights bandwagon of the tax-coerced solar fad. Try this for first principles instead of listening to that stupid Starbucks theme song for the millionth time: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  974. +CNCmachiningisfun You are a greener-than-thou poseur belle of the ball hitching a ride on a stupid fad.
    1
  975. +enator71 What are you talking about?
    1
  976. +enator71 If you want to take petroleum off the table of strategic resources, you won't do it with this solar foolishness. Try Thorium, molten salt reactors, and videos by Kirk Sorensen and others.
    1
  977. +enator71 Do homework on Thorium and molten salt reactors, Kirk Sorenson. Your concerns are addressed there.
    1
  978. +enator71 1) see the video "is nuclear waste really waste" for reprocessing advantages 2) the gamma ray concern you mention is not from natural thorium , but one of the elements in the chain. see more videos to get comfortable with that. 3) the gamma emissions of the intermediate products make Thorium "proliferation resistant" -- "it's easily detectable and it kills you without thick protection," says Kirk Sorensen 4) see the various TED talks for different perspectives on the same issue(s) 5) Thorium us as common as tin; ore scarcity is not an issue; see some more videos to get that part straightened out and also get a correct comparison with uranium: u235 vs u238. Kirk Sorenson: "burning u235 is like burning platinum."
    1
  979. +enator71 Watch the videos before jumping to conclusions. The benefits outweigh the downsides - the benefits make simple gamma Ray shielding look trivial. They have walk-safety shutdown features that account for the gamma rays. Tidbit: the hotter it is radioactively, the shorter the half-life. Gamma in general is hot, so it's half life is relatively short. Once again, see the Kirk Sirenson, multi-TED videos on this to get depth and perspective on it. Rare Earths is one of those Sierra Club-govt screwups where they hounded American producers out of business because the processes produced s trivially radioactive waste. Anyone care to guess what that trivially radioactive waste was?
    1
  980. +enator71 Just watch the videos before shooting your mouth off like jerk.
    1
  981. +Passed High School Physics If NIF is about fusion, may I do my bit to stop those subsidies too: Fusion is a boondoggle with an academic-bureaucrat life of its own. See the Kirk Sorenson videos for a quick takedown of Fusion and its obvious drawbacks. "Thorium is what fusion was supposed to be."
    1
  982. +enator71 I have, more than you on subject of thorium, and the efforts are wasted on a know-it-all blowhard like you. There's no reason to be bombast-negative about Thorium. Too bad such an opportunity trashed that way.
    1
  983. +Passed High School Physics Right... Kirk Sorenson videos are excellent and exciting places to start up the learning curve of thorium. In the competitive debating department, it's astonishing that fusion (that's NIF, right?) has gotten a dime of slush money. Kirk destroys it's practicality deftly with a few sentences of the nuclear physics behind it. It's always 10 years away from prime time and it's a boondoggle for university research handouts. Sorry, I don't know what TWRs are, but i heard Kirk dismiss them handily in one of interviews. The real pay-dirt is in Thorium and msr (molten salt reactors)
    1
  984. +Passed High School Physics I've taken a crack at Terra Power and I'm disappointed. This is Bill Gates' fun in retirement schoolboy science project. Bill is also the one lecturing us on some stupid "carbon neutral formula " he wants to ram down everyone's throat. This is what happens when you you have too much time and money on your hands. Seriously, TWR is just a bunch of cartoons a this point with a Bill-Nye-levels sales pitch. TWS: solid fuel (worse than liquid); a cartoon variation on the breeder reactor (basically tried and failed; see some of Sorenson videos for a compare and contrast of fast neutron reactor basics vs slow neutron ("thermal" i.e. slowed down to ambient temperature by a moderator, so the neutron can sidel up to the nucleus, get absorbed, and cause a fission. (I've been listening to to the UC Berkeley Nuclear Engineering videos; great example of YouTube education potential). Back to Traveling Wave Reactors, Kirk Sorenson mentions it in a taxi cab interview in one of his videos and 1, describes it in the high-risk speculative technology that it is, dismisses it accordingly. I've seen the Traveling Wave cartoon and it looks frankly crazy. Some snake oil salesman got to Bill Gates with this one - solid fuel (bad), no visible means of reaction control (good regulatory luck with that), etc. Sorry to disappoint and not enthuse about Traveling Wave, but TWR looks as challenging, high risk, and boondoggle-ish as fusion, i.e. a money losing waste of time compared to Thorium and MSRs (molten salt reactors)
    1
  985. +Passed High School Physics It's a detail, but how can you say TWR is ready to go when all you see are cartoon interpretations of it on YouTube? Whatever, I recommend investing time in the Kirk Sorensen videos, understanding them as thoroughly as possible, and cross referencing the material with others who are betting their futures on it. Ted and Google talk have and expanding catalog of presenters on this subject, but Kirk Sorensen is the founder of the "Thorium Renaissance" (he understands how to take advantage of YouTube, also to his credit (!)).
    1
  986. +Passed High School Physics PS, which UC Berkeley course(s) are you watching?
    1
  987. +Passed High School Physics .... Nuclear Engineering 101 was a "nice review"? Wow... you must have a lot of heavy science and math under your belt. Am not familiar witj the other courses, will check them out eventually.
    1
  988. +Passed High School Physics Muller takes the climate quack loyalty oath.
    1
  989. +Passed High School Physics How do you get u235 from coal?
    1
  990. +Passed High School Physics I'm sure the blood thirsty alarmist quacks can't wait to beat everyone up with that one. I suppose dirt dust has "radioactive isotopes" in them too. I think you're missing the point with... with what ? coal ashes? Are you expecting utilities to sift out u235 from coal ashes?
    1
  991. +Passed High School Physics You're saying it is economically feasible to recover u235 from coal ash?
    1
  992. +Passed High School Physics Acghghg.... If you say so. "Do yourself a favor" and spend a few hours among the thorium enthusiast videos. You'll find so many compelling advantages and abundances you'll wish you were a high school kid again looking for a career.
    1
  993. +Passed High School Physics What is NIF?
    1
  994. +Passed High School Physics It's a shame it's wasted on you. You should understand the politics behind light water reactors and uranium.
    1
  995. +Passed High School Physics The only reason TW sees the light of day is b c Bill Gates got sold a foolish snake oil bill of goods on it.
    1
  996. +Passed High School Physics Like we discussed before, all I see about Traveling Wave Reactors are these 5 minute cartoon presentations. No, other coutries are not "getting into it" because there's no evidence of that. On the other hand, a Thorium search turns up lots of international effort: India China Norway Israel (Embarrassingly absent is the US, but that's changing.)
    1
  997. +Passed High School Physics Just like governments, rich people can do stupid things. TWR looks like one of those instances where some quack got hold of Bill Gate's ear and he got enamored with it. (just like he got taken in by the global warming crap - that's strike 2 for Bill and his "retirement legacy". He should have stuck to software. )
    1
  998. +Passed High School Physics Where is it? Show me some links. Yes, I think Bill Gates can be "that stupid" -- people with big egos and lots of money stupid things all the time - his embrace of climate quackery is a prime example. As far as I can see, Bill has nothing to show for his investment in TWR. I looked, and couldn't find. SHOW ME!
    1
  999. +Passed High School Physics Case closed. (you should apologize for wasting my time): Bill Gates stops chasing nuclear 'wave', pursues variety of reactors His fission company, TerraPower, alters its "traveling wave reactor," explores thorium, liquid fuel and alternative designs.  By Mark Halper | July 24, 2013 -- 05:30  2013 --- got that? http://www.zdnet.com/article/bill-gates-stops-chasing-nuclear-wave-pursues-variety-of-reactors/
    1
  1000. +Passed High School Physics You didn't even read the link. I think we've reached the limit of your reasoning capacity and the usefulness of this conversation.
    1
  1001. +Passed High School Physics Watch the Kirk Sorensen videos (which is obvious you haven't). He deals with the foolishness and money-pit boondoggle of fusion ("NIF"). Otherwise go jerk.
    1
  1002. +Passed High School Physics Watch the Kirk Sorensen videos (which is obvious you haven't). He deals with the foolishness and money-pit boondoggle of fusion ("NIF"). Otherwise go jerk.
    1
  1003. +Passed High School Physics Watch the Kirk Sorensen videos (which is obvious you haven't). He deals with the foolishness and money-pit boondoggle of fusion ("NIF"). Otherwise go jerk.
    1
  1004. +Passed High School Physics I see the trappings of opportunist chinese bureaucracy lining up to scoff some of Bill gate's money. (no other billionaires on board)
    1
  1005. +Passed High School Physics Kirk Sorenson makes the same argument more convincingly for thorium. Jang Jamin's son showed up at oak ridge after downloading all the T material that KS put on his website that was developed in the 50s. Same conclusion, the Chinese are going to get it and leave US in the dust. (the technicals on TWR sound like they are morphing into FLIBE's LFTR)
    1
  1006. +Passed High School Physics I think you're full of shit, and so do an expanding number of professionals in the field, but what you think is pretty much irrelevant.
    1
  1007. What happened to solar-than-thou CNC?
    1
  1008. +Passed High School Physics +CNCmachiningisfun CNC is one of the subset of the solar-than-thou elites for whom "off grid" is a status symbol and hobby, no doubt the envy of the chicks and juvenile climate quacks of Starbucks. I call it the "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" phenom. There's nothing wrong with hobbies, but here it's hitching a ride on a quack science superstition turned dangerous political movement - a bandwagon CNC-types are to ride on, s ready audience to show off their hobby to, but at the same enablers of the quackery, superstition, and hack politics of an evil political movement. They are the climate quackery's version of "radical chic"
    1
  1009. +Passed High School Physics Climate is always changing.
    1
  1010. +Passed High School Physics You're a full of shit climate quack.
    1
  1011. +CNCmachiningisfun You are belittling the achievements you have by endorsing Climate Quackery.
    1
  1012. +Passed High School Physics ??? Meanwhile, you are disappointing you HS physics teacher.
    1
  1013. Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. (right CNC?) For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  1014. +Passed High School Physics who?
    1
  1015. Maunder Minimum?
    1
  1016. What percent of these climate quacks are atheist? The reason I ask is because I think many big mouths on climate quack bandwagon are there because spouting the quackery makes them feel important. "I'm important because I'm trying to save the world!" ... when in fact they're making world worse in many ways. I submit that most of these idiots are atheists. Why? Because if you're an atheist, you're not important unless you're putting something over on somebody, "justifying your existence" if you will. Climate quackery is a convenient ("cheap") vehicle for this. On the other hand, if you are a theist -- and you're also around other people who are -- you're already important because you're already "one of God's children" -- you don't have to go around imposing yourself on other people to prove your importance. Yes? no?
    1
  1017. +Andrew Spare me the sermon. Statistically i bet 100 percent of these climate quacks are atheists. why? see above.
    1
  1018. Rant on, climate quack.
    1
  1019. What a bunch of shitheads.
    1
  1020. How's things in Climate Quack Land?
    1
  1021. Lot of stupid drivel on this site.
    1
  1022. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps!
    1
  1023. Singsongy voice gets irritating and sounds twerly/snotty after a while.
    1
  1024. Pretty quiet among the know it all Starbucks cool people climate quack snake oil salesmen bullies. Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1025. Too bad the videographer does such a poor job. Thousands of people could be getting a good intro to Chem E if somebody had noticed early on what a poor job was being done and easy it was to fix with a few words of advice, e.g. put the camera on what Professor Robertson is talking TO, not the professor himself.
    1
  1026. The cold of the Little Ice Age brought us the Black Death. Too bad they didn't have SUVs to and a few more parts per million co2 molecules to the atmosphere and warm things up.
    1
  1027. Tell those stupid climate quacks "do you want to experience of real greenhouse gas? Spend the night in the desert without a sleeping bag.
    1
  1028. Would Tesla collapse without the costs transferred and imposed on the taxpayer? ("subsidies")
    1
  1029. +Daniel Jr Ignorant comment. The whole EV business is loaded with subsidies.
    1
  1030. +Joseph Brody Another ignorant comment. Subsidies to flavored boondoggles mean a cost shifting of government to the rest of us, which in this case means poor people because EV subsidies are welfare for the rich.
    1
  1031. +Daniel Jr Spare me your ass-backward moralizing lectures - "other people do it, why can't i have MY rich boy toy subsidy?" ("common good" - are you this nauseating with everyone or just me?) BTW - you're absolutely right with the mortgage tax deduction - it's a screwing of renters, which is ok with grossly arrogant "incentivizing" people like you, because you like to screw people through the government to your own advantage and then lecture the rest of us on how mortally superior you are, when in fact you are a self-serving piece of crap.
    1
  1032. The essence and source of Asian characteristics including slim bodies is a function of their baseline survival activity which is wet rice farming Wet rice farming is a finely-tuned activity which does not lend itself to feast or famine. Let's just say there's no feast or famine in the survival routine in the Asian gene pool because they have their food production fine-tuned down to the rice crop . I know there are exceptions, droughts and floods etc but for Millennia food production has gone with the monsoin cycle so there's no advantage to the feast or famine genes which have extra fat cells and the instinctive urge to put it on when you have the opportunity to do so. That's why Asian people are thin and why Western people aren't thin.
    1
  1033. Beware of FARTING MASTODONS! They caused 20 periods of interglacial warming.
    1
  1034. Liberty is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  1035. You are a pagan religionist assh--
    1
  1036. http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Winter-Causing-30-Year-Spell/dp/1630060356#productDescription_secondary_view_div_1460801790757
    1
  1037. The Climate Quacks strike again!
    1
  1038. You are a clown of quack melodrama.
    1
  1039. in other words you don't like free speech. in other words you are un American.
    1
  1040. The Obama immigration policy is a coup d'etat INVASION by the Democratic Party.
    1
  1041. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1042. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding!
    1
  1043. This man's wife is just "drop dead" - couldn't be a better intro for any subject matter about China.
    1
  1044. Lol
    1
  1045. "Geopolitics" is an insult to the middle class. Try this for first principles: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1046. +Geff King The government doesn't "define me". We, the people, define the government.
    1
  1047. +Geff King See original post.
    1
  1048. Have these stupid climate quacks ever wondered why the change in CO2 concentration from 0.000200 to 0.000400 could cause such a catastrophe? In percentage terms it's 0.02% to 0.04% increase on CO2 concentration. Big Deal! In parts per 1,000,000 it's gone from 200 parts per million to 400 parts per million, and it's had no provable effect on climate, only conjecture and assertion, easily contradicted by observation, e.g. The Little Ice Age, no change in temp lately, Viking settlements in Greenland, 20 periods of glaciation, The Maunder Minimum etc etc Of course, if you're an effeminate Starbucks twerp looking to get laid with some cheap pick up conversation about how "environmentally sensitive" and "sustainable" then maybe you do buy into the quackery of global warming if it helps you get laid.
    1
  1049. +Daisy Daze If you have a job at all, i take it it is in one of those "service" or "caring" fields where there is more feeling than thinking involved.
    1
  1050. +Scott Hunt Where do you get crap like this? You spoiled rotten brat and waste product of a government hijacked school system.
    1
  1051. Too bad the correspondent here is such an obnoxious abrasive (literally) mama's boy. He's one reason why people hate the news media.
    1
  1052. Maunder Minimum?
    1
  1053. +joshmdmd Does anyone wonder why we're obliged to have these stupid debates in the first place? "Renewables" is just another dimension for the creeps who play the stupid game of politics, to wit: I submit that the reason we're required to engage in these stupid conversations in the first place is because the climate quacks and hustlers can't keep to minding your own business and are trying to impose taxes, hardships, and a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Here are the first principles the climate quacks violate: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1054. +Paul Galkowski NO! Net Metering is Starbucks-elite cost shifting of grid expense to the poor.
    1
  1055. +Yoyo Ma Right Yoyo, These people are like children who believe in Santa clause. They are full of sh*t.
    1
  1056. +Yoyo Ma Right - and it's tax-funded quackery and superstition. Consensus is scientific truth... Correlation is causation.... These are bad and stupid people.
    1
  1057. The Education establishment has hijacked a whole generation on this GW crap - turned them into Red Guards, parental informants, and Hitler Youth. These GW quacks need to be de-programmed.
    1
  1058. Thank you 10th! for having the patience to investigate this agw superstition and quackery.
    1
  1059. !
    1
  1060. +luvcheney1 Yes. and Habitat For Humanity is for feel-good idiots who dont know how much government has forced up housing prices with their stupid regulations and inflation.
    1
  1061. Does anyone have "the book" for this?
    1
  1062. Is there something snotty about this guy or is it just me.
    1
  1063. Stupid videographer.
    1
  1064. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1065. Stupid comment.
    1
  1066. "Renewables" is just another dimension for the creeps who play the stupid game of politics, to wit: I submit that the reason we're required to engage in these stupid conversations in the first place is because the climate quacks and hustlers can't keep to minding your own business and are trying to impose taxes, hardships, and a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Here are the first principles the climate quacks violate: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1067. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1068. This is either self evident, or fly paper for boorish lowlives: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights.
    1
  1069. +Joeri Pross Are you really that much of a cool aid drinking idiot? Or are you putting us on?
    1
  1070. What makes him think he'd want to work with this schmuck?
    1
  1071. Bravo. Min 5:00. I was wondering the exact same thing from the previous lecture.
    1
  1072. , of the nearly $20 billion in alternative energy subsidies deployed over the past eight years for electric cars, rooftop solar and the like, the top income quintile received 60 percent of that money overall, and got 90 percent of EV subsidies. https://www.google.com/search?redir_esc=&client=ms-android-virgin-us&hl=en-US&safe=images&oe=utf-8&q=SolarCity&source=android-browser-type&qsubts=1466911536798#scso=uid_0:0
    1
  1073. Good thing this isn't Broadway. He'd fail as an understudy.
    1
  1074. Gee! It's awfully quiet among the know-it-all Starbucks cool-people pontificators of quack-science "climate change". Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1075. Kids Lemonade Stand crap.
    1
  1076. This is where the rich kid twerps hang out.
    1
  1077. Too bad the camera doesn't just stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only the audio is necessary from the speaker. The visual is distracting.
    1
  1078. The name of this room should be: Where The Dregs Of Carbon Quackery Hang Out.
    1
  1079. +Andrew Your question should apply to the aggressive hustlers and exhibitionist idiots in pages like this. Instead your glorified what's wrong with you "question" is just obnoxious, condescending, conceited insult, characteristic of these climate quacks in general, of which you are one. The soviet union was very good at "committing" dissidents, and you'd fit in well as a hatchet man of a regime like that, shithead that you are. I've said this a million times and I'll repeat again, for the benefit of Creep Andrew, the conceited turd in sheep's clothing: Climate Quackery is not about science. It's about power, imposing taxes, building bureaucracies, advancing careers, feeling superior by imposing pagan feel-good rituals (e.g. "recycling"), inflicting human sacrifice, institutionalizing superstition. If that doesn't make a person angry, then you are a piece of shit (you already are, but I'm giving you a chance to redeem.)
    1
  1080. Why are so many of these quack science believers female?
    1
  1081. +EmmittBrownBTTF1 <--- Supports the Indian-ization of civilization. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  1082. The Little Ice Age happened because a potato famine wiped out vodka production, which people were using to drive their SUVs. Without their SUV exhaust, the world got colder, and all the Vikings living in Greenland for 400 years froze and died.
    1
  1083. Where do people get this crap?
    1
  1084. Answer: a totally corrupt education system. Get the government 100% OUT of the education business, now!
    1
  1085. +ben nichols Yes, those liars trashed their credibility and now expect the world to take their quackery at face value.
    1
  1086. +David Wood The quackery of "global warming" is not about science it's about power. This time around a thuggish tax-supported bunch of opportunists want to impose taxes and hardship on you, skim a piece off for itself, set themselves up in a priesthood peddling a trumped up falsehood they cloak in the quackery of "global warming" That's why the funding for these idiots should be cut off - the sooner the better. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps! Now!
    1
  1087. +ben nichols Go Ben! The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps! Meanwhike, Liberty is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. The climate quacks want to tax you out of a piece of your standard of living by taxing your energy consumption, which mean they want to be skim off oil profits, like OPEC, so essentially IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC.
    1
  1088. You're the joke.
    1
  1089. +David Wood Just a empty person filling the emptiness with a cheap sense of importance - a pagan religionist advancing quackery and superstition. How are those pagan ritual going? recycling? eating less meat? did you drive a prius?
    1
  1090. Exacly, Pob. The (ridiculously obvious) problem of intermittency and storage makes "renewables" a childish Kids Lemonade Stand wishful thinking business. Everyone involved should be ashamed of this waste and feelgood quackery.
    1
  1091. +pobembe1958 Right pob. You have idiots on this site saying Britain is a good place for solar. Solar = quack-science Kids Lemonade Stand business.
    1
  1092. Do any of these idiots understand how gold raises all living standard standards? (Here's a hint: productivity)
    1
  1093. For the lowlife creeps of climate quackery who hang out on this website and have the nerve to think they are "defending human rights "..... "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights.
    1
  1094. One takeaway from this simple golden rule of politics is that power is evil. That's what the quacks, creeps, and hustlers m of this website are after - as should become evident after hanging out here for a while - the objectives of these creeps are as ugly as the souls that promote them.
    1
  1095. Abolutely. Climate quackery and superstition.
    1
  1096. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps! Meanwhike, Liberty is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. The climate quacks want to tax you out of a piece of your standard of living by taxing your energy consumption, which mean they want to be skim off oil profits, like OPEC, so essentially IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC.
    1
  1097. +Barbara Cardinali MacFerrin Climate Quackery is not about sciencen it's about Power. AGW is 21st century witch burning, human sacrifice and superstition. A bright teenager can poke holes in the quackery that passes for agw science.
    1
  1098. +Martin Hearn You're full of crap. Science is about prediction, and the stupid climate quack spreadsheet models ("numbers") fail totally and miserably at this. Find something else to feel superior about, you creep.
    1
  1099. +Andy Prosseda Bravo Andy! Thank you for having the patience to level with these idiots of climate quack superstition. And right! These douche bags make stupid claims and then demand that the rest of us prove the negatives -- the assholes.
    1
  1100. These are bad people trying to shake down the population with quackery and charlatanism.
    1
  1101. , of the nearly $20 billion in alternative energy subsidies deployed over the past eight years for electric cars, rooftop solar and the like, the top income quintile received 60 percent of that money overall, and got 90 percent of EV subsidies. https://www.google.com/search?redir_esc=&client=ms-android-virgin-us&hl=en-US&safe=images&oe=utf-8&q=SolarCity&source=android-browser-type&qsubts=1466911536798#scso=uid_0:0
    1
  1102. Where do these idiots come from? Answer: slave ("tax") funded education. Slave funded education has created a group of aggressive power seeking thugs out to further reduce your quality of life, as has been done with finance and social engineering.
    1
  1103. Another "give me money for my academic BOONDOGGLE " video.
    1
  1104. The dregs of Climate Quackery on this site get their fulfillment at other people's expense - taxes, power, lecturing, inflicting human sacrifice (more taxes, CAFE standards). They would serve humanity more and with greater dignity if they got real jobs cleaning toilets.
    1
  1105. ... and not to be underestimated is relief from social emptiness that comes from being one of the (self appointed) "good guys ". aka "fulfillment".
    1
  1106. Besides being dangerous, consumptive, and hated by pedestrians and motorists, bikes are the Kids Lemonade Stand of Transportation. They're just like solar energy, which is the kids Lemonade Stand version of energy
    1
  1107. Of course not. And these Al Sharptons of climate quackery say as much: "the science (sic) settled, there's no longer any debate, the consensus has reached its conclusion...."
    1
  1108. Music is too theatrical smart-alkecy.
    1
  1109. Are you. Chinese Communist Party stooge/hack/troll? Or just a lazy ignorant scared fool?
    1
  1110. +Hoochi Koochi Being neutral with Chicom atrocities IS relativism, making you disgustingly amoral.
    1
  1111. +CrowHD YOU are the amoral relativist trash.
    1
  1112. +Hoochi Koochi You make me sick.
    1
  1113. The quackery peddled by the GW bullies isn't science. Science is the proving of hypothesis through experimentation. (aka The Scientific Method) Therefore, on many levels the GW quackery is prima facie wrong. For example: man-caused-CO2 causes GW. Scientifically this is false, because there is no evidence of CO2 CAUSING GW, only some flimsy-at-best statistical Correlation of the two. Correlation is not causation. Therefore the so-called science of GW isn't science at all. It is old fashioned snake oil quackery.
    1
  1114. +fungussa You are the purveyor quack science snake oil. Your stupid "models" is not science- it's a snake oil fraud coming through a computer.
    1
  1115. +fungussa Where do these idiots come from? Answer: slave ("tax") funded education. Slave funded education has created a group of aggressive power seeking thugs out to further reduce your quality of life, as has been done with finance and social engineering.
    1
  1116. Did you get the notes?
    1
  1117. Isn't silence golden? Is this guy (sort of typical self-indulgent media twerp) complaining about "quiet"? What? You mean there isn't enough NOISE in the world?
    1
  1118. These climate quacks are out to shake down the countries with money. The won't "go after" poor people because they don't have money for these thugs, whores, and quacks to shake down for.
    1
  1119. This idiot said we had "an inordinate fear of communism".
    1
  1120. The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." The Democratic party specializes in Type 2 laws, that's why their leadership tend to be such bad people and psychopaths.
    1
  1121. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  1122. Dear climate realists and non coolaid drinkers with the patience to debate here, 1) the climate quacks are always trying to bully us with their "consensus" , that's a given. In addition to the evidence (data) not being there, there stupid models are false because their predictions are failures. I stick my neck out and say science isn't even about evidence (data), it's about predictive success. To wit, if your predictive hypothesis is correct, you can recreate the data with experiment. The climate quacks and hustlers (like this video) are complete failures here, and this is all the evidence you need to shut down the bullying, quackery and hustle. Professional scientists don't hesitate to point this out. PS: another thank you to the people with common sense and climate realism to take the time to do battle with these tax supported opportunists with an aggressive human sacrifice agenda. You are defending our freedom, standard of living, and quality of life.
    1
  1123. !
    1
  1124. Solar Chic is like Radical Chic.
    1
  1125. Such a load of crap.
    1
  1126. !
    1
  1127. Bravo!
    1
  1128. See the Thorium videos by Kirk Sorenson and others.
    1
  1129. Solar energy is a trivial Kids Lemonade Stand business justified by quack science, tax subsidies, and superstition.
    1
  1130. "Geopolitics" is an insult to the middle class. Try this for first principles: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1131. Chinese women are so gorgeous!
    1
  1132. You're so full of sanctimonious conceit.
    1
  1133. "pollution" passed the point of diminishing returns several decades ago. The issue has turned in a racket, boondoggle, and hustle.... especially for the types that hang out on sites like this.
    1
  1134. +antonio bortoni You just trashed your credibility. Clean up your own mess first before going around minding other people's business.
    1
  1135. +michael einhorn a) that takes all the power-fun out of it for the aggressive busy bodies b) "pollution" has been cleaned up greatly in the functional civilizations. Their's not much for the busy bodies to do except try to take away shopping bags.
    1
  1136. There's a movie out called Climate Hustle. BTW, farting mastodons caused the 20 warming periods between the periods of glaciation ("ice ages") right?
    1
  1137. Burning fossil fuels is GREEN because it adds CO2 which is green plant food and that makes the planet greener.
    1
  1138. LOL! right on. amazing how gw turns successful careers into quack-science promoters.
    1
  1139. Gee! It's awfully quiet among the know-it-all Starbucks cool-people pontificators of quack-science "climate change". Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1140. Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  1141. Do you from first hand experience and knowledge?
    1
  1142. For "renewable energy" fiasco, see Germany.
    1
  1143. There used to be 5000 feet of ice over most of the continents, but that melted because cave men figured out how to heat themselves with camp fires, increasing the co2 by several parts per million, causing global warming, melting the glaciers.
    1
  1144. "Bad news" presentation. ...
    1
  1145. Young Turks are spoiled un American brats with too much time on their hands.
    1
  1146. Did y'all see the good Professor take the loyalty oath to Climate Quackery?
    1
  1147. +David Wood This is a hangout for Starbucks poseurs and would-be climate enforcement thugs.
    1
  1148. This is TYT? What a bunch of sanctimonious richkid twerps.
    1
  1149. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1150. Fusion is the world's biggest BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  1151. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1152. This video is the Munich beer hall of climate quackery.
    1
  1153. Dakota Access Pipeline is another childish publicity stunt tantrum by spoiled brats. Grow up, get a life, study freedom, Adam Smith, and Americanism, then say a prayer of thanks for how good you have it.
    1
  1154. The fraud of solar should be self evident by what's happening on this blog, to wit: if solar is so great (i.e. cost effective) no one would have to make feel-good infomercials for it. Better products sell themselves. Are cars cost effective? Yes. Nobody nags you about buying cars, but the competing manufacturers are out there trying to win your business and buy Their car. That doesn't happen with solar because it's a subsidized fraud. It doesn't without the subsidy.
    1
  1155. This is an "I'm so smart and everybody else is stupid" -- characteristic if the conceit you find in essentially all of these liberal issues.
    1
  1156. What is this "authoritarian" crap? Case in point: Trump = less regulation. That is the OPPOSITE of authoritarianism, you stupid sh*ts.
    1
  1157. Canada Care = Managed SUFFERING.
    1
  1158. Canada Care = Managed SUFFERING. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Barbarian_Invasions http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338135/ The Barbarian Invasions In this belated sequel to 'The Decline of the American Empire', 50-something Montreal college professor, Remy, learns that he is dying of liver cancer. He decides to make amends meet to his friends and family before he dies. He first tries to made peace with his ex-wife Louise, who asks their estranged son Sebastian, a successful businessman living in London, to come home. Sebastian makes the impossible happen, using his contacts and disrupting the entire Canadian system in every way possible to help his father fight his terminal illness to the bitter end, while he also tries to reunite his former friends, Pierre, Alain, Dominique, Diane, and Claude to see their old friend before he passes on. Written by matt-282 Show less REPLY
    1
  1159. Best Foreign Language Film: Barbarian Invasion
    1
  1160. CanadaCare = managed suffering
    1
  1161. Amen.
    1
  1162. +lakecrab Oh geeeee! Aren't you wonderful with all your idiotic Greener Than Thou rituals. If crap like that makes you feel good, fine. Just don't try to impose those stupid feel-good crap rituals and sacrifices on the rest of us.
    1
  1163. Very good Philip! Unfortunately, the quacks, hustlers and idiots that hang out in hell holes like this don't respect Constitutional values, and are using all their energies to destroy them. ... The Quack Science movement should be called Idiots R Us.
    1
  1164. One thing to eliminate is your waving.
    1
  1165. +Ibliss What a load of snake oil sales.
    1
  1166. He can't get a straight answer on "Is the FBI doing it's job?"
    1
  1167. Have you "climate change" bullies quacks and losers heard if the Ice Age? Did you know there have been 20 "ice ages" (periods of glaciation) in the part of earth history? No? You haven't? And you expect the rest of to take your thuggish quackery at face value? Go get a real job, you stupid losers!
    1
  1168. All quiet on the Climate Quack front?
    1
  1169. LOL! I love it when common sense folks remain "cool" in the face of bullying from the Climate Quacks.
    1
  1170. What happened is FEMO-FASCISM.
    1
  1171. Too bad the camera doesn't just stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only the audio is necessary from the speaker. The visual is distracting.
    1
  1172. All idiotic me me me ...
    1
  1173. I submit that the reason we're required to engage in these stupid conversations in the first place is because the climate quacks and hustlers can't keep to minding your own business and are trying to impose taxes, hardships, and a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Here are the first principles the climate quacks violate: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1174. Besides being hell for pedestrians and motorists, they are new-age Millennial selfishness in action.
    1
  1175. Wrong! Bernie Sanders wants MORE GOVERNMENT ("socialism"). Bernie Sander is a 'hole This guy just wants to hear himself talk and is a fool. The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." The Democratic party specializes in Type 2 laws, that's why their leadership tends to be such bad people and psychopaths.
    1
  1176. Think TYPE-2, you long-winded yak yak fool.
    1
  1177. +Heron Myer Heron... I wouldn't waste your time arguing responsible, adult-supervised economics with CNC. He's one of these guys: DIY solar: LOOK MA! NO HANDS! Are you playing the SOLAR-AS-STATUS-SYMBOL game too? I'm sure that plays well with the Starbucks crowd. This is well-documented behavior: when apes have extra time on their hands, they engage in "improving status" -- now play the ape noises Tim Allen makes. Thorstein Veblin wrote a famous book about this called Theory Of The Leisure Class.
    1
  1178. +CNCmachiningisfun Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  1179. Canada Care = Managed SUFFERING.
    1
  1180. "Murder" is an act of physical aggression -- therefore your statement is act of a schmuck (probably a state-educated one). LIBERTY is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only two kinds of laws: Type 1) laws that protect property rights, Type 2) laws that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto other people's property as you'd have government do unto you and your property."
    1
  1181. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1182. Have these stupid climate quacks ever wondered why the change in CO2 concentration from 0.000200 to 0.000400 could cause such a catastrophe? In percentage terms it's 0.02% to 0.04% increase on CO2 concentration. Big Deal! In parts per 1,000,000 it's gone from 200 parts per million to 400 parts per million, and it's had no provable effect on climate, only conjecture and assertion, easily contradicted by observation, e.g. The Little Ice Age, no change in temp lately, Viking settlements in Greenland, 20 periods of glaciation, The Maunder Minimum etc etc Of course, if you're an effeminate Starbucks twerp looking to get laid with some cheap pick up conversation about how "environmentally sensitive" and "sustainable" then maybe you do buy into the quackery of global warming if it helps you get laid.
    1
  1183. Burning fossil fuels is GREEN because it adds CO2 which is green plant food and that makes the planet greener.
    1
  1184. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps!
    1
  1185. These guys make me sick.
    1
  1186. He's a pretty-boy trust fund twerp.
    1
  1187. The dregs of climate quackery reside here.
    1
  1188. "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1189. In addition to being a child of climate quackery, "solar" is a Kids Lemonade Stand business and a LOOK MA! NO HANDS! status symbol hobby.
    1
  1190. What site is he talking about?
    1
  1191. GW is a tax shakedown by bad people who seek to profit at the expense of the general population.
    1
  1192. You are an obnoxious self serving know it all twerp with you "biosphere"
    1
  1193. +Chrizzie 78 "The magic sentences to frame any political discussion": Freedom is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that PROTECT property rights, (good) - and those that ATTACK property rights. (evil)
    1
  1194. "jeopardizing the biosphere " what a glittering all encompassing college quack concept - just like "enemy of the state" or "blasphemy" from the superstitions of old. Your attempts at aggressive self justification through quack alarmism is disgusting and pathetic. Spare us your school boy Paul Revereism and go make an honest living.
    1
  1195. +Joshua Miller Your "biosphere" comment is a twerpish juvenile rich kid college boy comment of such sanctimonious generality as to be intellectually and socially worthless, unless there are equally stupid eligible females around who are impressed by the "sensitive" crap.
    1
  1196. +Joshua Miller It's your whole sanctimonious smartest in the the class shtick that is disgusting. And yes your "capitalism" comment shows your stupidly profound ignorance of capitalism itself, steeped in the self regarding masturbation of the Starbucks rap session. Your stupid sustainability shtick (whatever that really means) makes no mention of PRICE. Scarcity means high prices. High prices attack competition and resources. The solution to high prices is high prices. It also means get your oh-so-sensitive ass out the the lofty Starbucks rap session and get to work.
    1
  1197. ATTRACT, not 'attack'
    1
  1198. +Joshua Miller "... we need to transition to Renewables in order to safeguard conditions that can grow crops..." What a stupidly sophomoric statement! "We need..." - speak for yourself you obnoxious Starbucks plutocrat. "... to transition to renewables... " that's Starbucks-speak for tax-funded boondoggles. "... to safeguard conditions that can grow crops... " Where do you get such idiocy? Tax funded sh#t holes called "universities" most likely. Flash news item! Plants Like CO2 ! ! ! Climate Quacks eat sh#t !
    1
  1199. Spoiled little Starbucks twerp.
    1
  1200. +Joshua Miller Here come the Red Guards of atmosphere control. This is intra-species Darwinism - the attack of the aggressive in the passive. This time their excuse is fraudulent, self-evidently false claims of the Carbon Quacks. This is what 100 years of government controlled and slave-funded education has brought us to. It's not just a shame, it's an attack on our existence by bad people. It will get worse unless something is done. It will take more than elections to beat back this (these) attacks on your life liberty and property.
    1
  1201. Pretty quiet among the know it Starbucks cool people climate quack snake oil salesmen bullies. Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1202. Gee! It's awfully quiet among the know-it-all Starbucks cool-people pontificators of quack-science "climate change". Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1203. +Joshua Miller Anything new from the Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown power grabbers?
    1
  1204. What do you call junk science quackery on a mass scale? Answer: SUPERSTITION.
    1
  1205. Burning fossil fuels is GREEN because it adds CO2 which is green plant food and that makes the planet greener.
    1
  1206. Yes indeed! He is a tax supported quack.
    1
  1207. If a small fraction of those idiot-solar subsidies went to Thorium, we'd have it by now.
    1
  1208. +Steven Bee Anything new from the Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown power grabbers?
    1
  1209. +Steven Bee Get a real job and get some of that crap out of your head.
    1
  1210. +Steven Bee Notice you say "institution" - all getting their funding from the quackery thugs like you stir up. You are a despicable piece of crap.
    1
  1211. Those stupid "renewables" are the kids lemonade stand of energy.
    1
  1212. +CJ Fuller Cheap shot.
    1
  1213. The fires and death from the no-fuel-pump setup are infamous.
    1
  1214. <--- "population control " creep. I suggest joining isis if you want to inflict suffering on people.
    1
  1215. CO2 is a trivial among "greenhouse gases " (compare to water vapor) and even more trivial in terms of total climate. Yet these "Science Class Thugs want to use it to impose reduced living standards on us, while enriching government and the quacks behind this shakedown.
    1
  1216. These climate quacks are an example of the sense of entitlement bred into obmoxious twerps in the state-funded education system. i.e. get good at slinging oppressive something-or-other around (in this case climate quackery) that cab be used to levy a whole new layer of tax hardship on society, and presto! you've got yourself a cushy boondoggle career, which you were entitled to in the first place because you were the smartest in the class. That's why the funding for these pricks should be cut off - the sooner the better.
    1
  1217. in other words "farting cows?" ... not as sexy as stranded polar bears.
    1
  1218. +Brad Pitt Yes, and we can't go back to herds of buffalo because they fart a lot too. how about banning the sale of baked beans?
    1
  1219. +David Foster ... but you can sure spread a lot of quackery , superstition, and crap.... talk about "organics" !
    1
  1220. +Luke Barnes Yes, we should return the great plains to the buffalo, because they fart less than steers. .... and when the mastodons appear in the next ice age, they should be slaughtered because their farting caused the inter glaciation warming.
    1
  1221. +David Foster Suffice it to say you and your obnoxious climate quack hustlers have found a cheap way to make yourselves look good, in classic mirror gazing fashion, when in fact, you suck, both in terms of science and your "karma".
    1
  1222. +David Foster BS! Without tax funding this climate quackery wouldn't see the light of day.
    1
  1223. +David Foster What a repulsive windbag. co2 is trivial, provided its More of A Cause than an effect in the first place. You're a pontificating would-be priest of climate quack paganism.
    1
  1224. See this fine interview for an antidote to the quackery masquerading as science: https://youtu.be/BhFqgflaQVQ
    1
  1225. These selfish, obnoxious, aggressive, spoiled brat "Millennials" want to take over priceless urban transportation infrastructure for their own spoiled-child recreational fun, at the expense, danger, and misery of everyone else! "Hey Millennials! If you want 2-wheels, get at God damn motorcycle and keep up with traffic!:
    1
  1226. Absolutely Jonny. These are the lowlife dregs if Climate Quackery. The reason we have have stupid conversations like this is because blowhards like you can't keep to minding your own business and trying to impose a conceited sense of superiority on the rest of us. Try this for first principles instead of listening to that stupid Starbucks theme song for the millionth time: Power is evil, because of the following golden rule of politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1227. Yes szaki. The climate quacks and hustlers want to impose hardships on you, reducing you standard of living, imposing misery. Isn't it something what a monstrosity several decades of government controlled education has produced?
    1
  1228. Climate Quacks and Solar Charlatans want to do with energy what Stalin did with agriculture.
    1
  1229. This guy is absolutely full of it. Freedom is a poetic term for property rights! And that includes money. In a crude way, money politics is purchased protection of property rights. So what's corrupt is democracy itself - it's now a big protection racket - and this guy is a shakedown thug who wants to repeal the first amendment.
    1
  1230. Talks too fast.
    1
  1231. "Carbon Quackery" Watch these videos to expose the quackery of "global warming". It is 21st century superstition and witch-burning. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ
    1
  1232. +VeryEvilPettingZoo You'd prefer to "believe" the self-serving climate quacks and their outright dishonest fraud (data falsification) and buy into an argument a high schooler can poke holes in. Bob Carter does the hole poking from the perspective of real science, not that that makes any difference to a screeching witch-hunter like you.
    1
  1233. You missed the caught red handed fraud of Anglican Instutute and elsewhere. You are an aggressive, imposing, charlatan piece of shit.
    1
  1234. You are a lowlife thug of a most disgusting sort.
    1
  1235. +VeryEvilPettingZoo You have bought into an excuse for violence - verbal and eventually physical - based on stupidity and superstition, just like the witch burners and inquisitors and communist-fingerers of the past . You are a reprehensible gullible piece of crap. Before spending any more time on your climate quack hobby horse, go spend a night in the desert without a sleeping bag, you obnoxious know it all twerp.
    1
  1236. Where does these idiots come from? Answer: slave ("tax") funded education. Slave funded education has created a group of aggressive power seeking thugs out to further reduce your quality of life, as has been done with finance and social engineering.
    1
  1237. +Aanthanur DC "People in your country" haven't figured out a way to do it without the slavery of taxes. That doesn't make them smart, it makes them stupid. So spare me your self righteous slavery supporting "civics" lectures.
    1
  1238. ... It's a "this is how the other half lives" kind of story.
    1
  1239. ... It's a "this is how the other half lives" kind of story.
    1
  1240. Obnoxious interviewer. Dinesh is head and shoulders above this guy.
    1
  1241. Isn't he wrong on the gasoline math?
    1
  1242. Good points, but this is about science, it's about.... well... Solar energy is... 1) A child of climate quackery 2) A Kids Lemonade Stand business 3) A "LOOK MA! NO HANDS" status symbol and hobby. (right CNC ?) For an abundant energy future, see the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium and MSRs (Molten Salt Reactors).
    1
  1243. See Professor Moodz post below. March 4
    1
  1244. +Donald Kasper Yes! You're talking about NAPAP study and that stupid "acid rain" crap, right? God help us and stupid scare monging we have to suffer from.
    1
  1245. Solar is a school-boy science project, Kid's Lemonade Stand business.
    1
  1246. Burning fossil fuels is GREEN because it adds CO2 which is green plant food and that makes the planet greener.
    1
  1247. Yes Tim. Climate Quackology is not about science, it's about power, which is written all over the aggressive creeps that hang out in these hell holes.
    1
  1248. +Alejandro Reyes Where do you get this crap?
    1
  1249. +therrydicule Anything new from the Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown power grabbers?
    1
  1250. +therrydicule LOL! What a load of pathetic crap! First it's "we're all going to burn up!" then it's "dago toll takers have low sperm count".... and we should tax the world to a halt because of it. L M A O ! ! You can't make this stuff up. This is the foolishness our idiot state run school systems have brought us to. YES , we are doomed, but not from climate quackery, but from PEOPLE QUACKERY. FYI, I don't give a shit about dago toll taker sperm counts, and if they think suck in bed because the stand in traffic all day they should get another job, you stupid shit. Speaking of getting a job, you should get a real job too, and ditch the dipshit effeminate Starbucks pseudo intellectualism.
    1
  1251. Well said, A. These climate quacks are out to shake down the countries with money. The won't "go after" poor people because they don't have money for these thugs, whores, and quacks to shake down for.
    1
  1252. +therrydicule "They go after "pollution" ? ? ? Really. In that case they should "go after " you twice: - once for the co2 coming out of your mouth - an utterly credibility destroying assertion pollution quackery, and - for the quackery itself that's coming out of your mouth. The stupid things you say are thought pollution. Speaking if "ass", that's where you can stick your stupid "peer reviewed" studies. Quacks and thugs like this guy want to turn their compromised-integrity "peer reviews" from a bunch of self-serving whore quacks in a form of legislation - dictatorship by science quacks. Watch out folks - a quack-science bunch of thugs is on it's way to screw the middle class.
    1
  1253. +therrydicule Spare me your stupid sermons and go get a real job, you spoiled little shit.
    1
  1254. +therrydicule Your crappy life is spent trying to become a comforable elitist trying to impose hardships on everybody else with the stupid quackery you pick up at "univetsity". Watch out folks! - the quacks and thugs of global warming are working hard to turn their "peer reviews" into a form of legislature - a dictatorship of quacks, which our opportunist politicians are all too happy to take advantage of, - the thugs of quack-science global warming are on their way to SCREW the middle class, with their taxes and regulations.
    1
  1255. +therrydicule You're an effing idiot. This is the "education" taxpayers are forced to pay for? You are a disgusting person with a disgusting existence.
    1
  1256. +therrydicule You're the one living in your quack-land bubble of the dipshit "university", trying to drum up business with your stupid trivial little sperm count article. Get a real job, you spoiled little shit, and stop trying to make everyone else miserable, impoverished, oppressed.
    1
  1257. +therrydicule Indeed, there were many useful idiots for communism in America. You're a useful idiot for an oppression based on quack science, instead of quack economics, which makes you a disgusting person - characteristics you might shed if made an honest living instead of trying to mooch a cushy living by hitching yourself to the tax-funded bandwagon of Climate Quackery.
    1
  1258. +therrydicule 1) Climate is always changing. The quackery comes from cushy job seeking opportunists like yourself trying to use it as an instrument if oppression, which makes you a reprehensible scumbag in addition to a reprehensible quack. 2) "not all of the quacks are funded by tax money" LOL.... Do you know how guilty and lame that sounds? 3) "some of the quacks are funded by donations" ... indeed, there are lots of spoiled idiots who have bought into this crap and contribute to the quacks. If the quacks said "hey relax, there's nothing to get excited about here" their funding would vanish faster than one of your stupid icebergs with a polar bear on it. You show how easily you're manipulated and are a naive wet behind the ears born yesterday obnoxious punk. Get a real job you spoiled little shit.
    1
  1259. +therrydicule You're such a mealy mouth little twerp. I never said anything about "weather" you two faced schmuck. Ooooo wooooow ! Look at Climate Quack talk about Einstein! Very goooood! Smartest in the class! Got get a real job and start making honest production with your time instead of the make believe parasitical crap you waste your time with now, you self righteous prima donna little shit.
    1
  1260. +therrydicule Have you ever heard of "justifying your existence, you obnoxious little big mouth college twerp? You haven't? Well, look around your quack science "peer reviews" and your stupidly naive notion of the saintly impartiality of the "university".
    1
  1261. +therrydicule Not only are you the peddler of science quackery, you are a peddler of social quackery. ("University impartiality is irrelevant (ooooo big word!). Tell that to the millions who suffered and perished under communism and twerps like you). Hey you spoiled rich kid twerp with too much time on your hands - go get a real job that contributes something to the world instead of you quack science crap.
    1
  1262. Alej, right on! Here's my 2 cents: The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. The climate quacks (e.g. Al Gore) really aren't "scientists" i.e. practitioners of the scientific method (proof by experimentation) -- they are political hacks with an agenda. IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC. Cut off the funding of these creeps! They are trying to set up a quack preisthood of an eco-pagan religion and then impose taxes, regulations, and hardships on the rest of us - LIKE THEY DO IN INDIA. Keep this up and we'll be as poor and backward as INDIA. Cut off the funding of these creeps! Meanwhile, Liberty is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. The climate quacks want to tax you out of a piece of your standard of living by taxing your energy consumption, which means they want to be skim off oil profits, like OPEC, so essentially IPCC wants to be a partner with OPEC. They'll do this by doing to your energy consumption what they do to your garbage - that obnoxious pagan ritual called "recycling" - only much worse. They are attacking the very essence of your standard of living standards, which is energy consumption (i.e.pulling a rickshaw vs. driving a car). PS: "recycling" is to eco-paganism what Communion is to Christianity, only in recycling's case, it is a useless, obnoxious, state-imposed pagan ritual. (If it had any usefulness, the Market would do it itself, like copper recycling.)
    1
  1263. +Douglas E Knapp What a load of crap.
    1
  1264. Yeah! Have the govt make 2nd class citizens out of the lower middle class!
    1
  1265. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1266. Anything new from the Climate Quacks, effeminate Starbucks know-it-alls, or obnoxious eco-shakedown con artists?
    1
  1267. Notice how know it all Bill has joined up with enforcer-NASA to punish the non-believers in the quack science paganism.
    1
  1268. Get a load of this alarmist quack! "The sky is falling! You must walk instead of ride! We must freeze instead of stay warm! We must go back rickshaws!" And this idiot is a "Professor of Climate Change" - a slave-funded quack trying to make me poorer- what a piece of crap this guy is.
    1
  1269. There is no global problem so there is no global solution. On the other hand, I'd look more inward when it comes to problems because you have sold a load of foolish propaganda and quackery by unscrupulous people who have a personal, empire building agenda to advance.
    1
  1270. +Kittycupz . Either stop breathing of stop listening to this climate crap.
    1
  1271. Yeah, this more action than this RINO deserves.
    1
  1272. +Dick Hamilton Is that "peer reviewed" too? You can claim quantity knowledge of something as complicated as the sun to 2 parts in 13000? ("energy" whatever that means when talking about the sun (infrared? gamma? particle? ) Does the Maunder Minimum mean anything to the idiot climate quacks? Little Ice Age? Roman Warm Period? (that happened because the Romans had chariots and their horses farted when the had races.
    1
  1273. +Dick Hamilton Is that "peer reviewed" too? You can claim quantity knowledge of something as complicated as the sun to 2 parts in 13000? ("energy" whatever that means when talking about the sun (infrared? gamma? particle? ) Does the Maunder Minimum mean anything to the idiot climate quacks? Little Ice Age? Roman Warm Period? (that happened because the Romans had chariots and their horses farted when the had races.
    1
  1274. +Dick Hamilton ... climate thugs like you and the disgusting "correspondent" and tax-supported "expert" in this nauseating video.
    1
  1275. +Dick Hamilton repost maunder minimun
    1
  1276. +Dick Hamilton I'm interested in how you deal with Maunder Minimum. Meanwhile, Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack Cut off the funding for these creeps and charlatans! Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack
    1
  1277. +Dick Hamilton Tell me about Maunder Minimum, otherwise I'll think the Little Ice Age happened because Roman chariot horses stopped farting.
    1
  1278. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  1279. +Stephen Nielsen <-- This piece of sled dog shit is putting the burden of proof on YOU! His quackery is accepted ad fact and the rest of are expected to prove the negatives, like a big sleazy harassment lawysuit. The quackery of climate change is not about science, it's about power. Cut off the funding of these creeps!
    1
  1280. The quackery of "global warming" is not about science it's about power. This time around a thuggish tax-supported bunch of opportunists want to impose taxes and hardship on you, skim a piece off for itself, set themselves up in a priesthood peddling a trumped up falsehood they cloak in the quackery of "global warming" That's why the funding for these idiots should be cut off - the sooner the better. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps! Now!
    1
  1281. +Stephen Nielsen The quackery of "global warming" is not about science it's about power. This time around a thuggish tax-supported bunch of opportunists want to impose taxes and hardship on you, skim a piece off for itself, set themselves up in a priesthood peddling a trumped up falsehood they cloak in the quackery of "global warming" That's why the funding for these idiots should be cut off - the sooner the better. Cut off the funding for these quacks, creeps, shysters and twerps! Now!
    1
  1282. How are the bananas of Climate Quackery tonight?
    1
  1283. Such a lucky man!
    1
  1284. +Nic D Thank you, Ron Paul. But he doesn't realize that borders are the all that's left of social freedom for the non-wealthy. politics: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: - those that protect property rights, - and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others as you'd have the goverment do unto you."
    1
  1285. Pretty quiet among the know it Starbucks cool people climate quack snake oil salesmen bullies. Where's that "consensus" intimidation when you need it?
    1
  1286. Quack quack quack quack quack...
    1
  1287. The govt is out of control.
    1
  1288. This is great stuff, but is anyone besides me shocked that these science-experiment cars are allowed to drive in public traffic? Putting the rest of us at risk?
    1
  1289. http://www.forbes.com/sites/markpmills/2016/06/25/the-tesla-and-solar-city-merger-is-rooted-in-battery-derangement-syndrome/#7cc771b7df8f
    1
  1290. The Education establishment has hijacked a whole generation on this GW crap - turned them into Red Guards, parental informants, and Hitler Youth. These GW quacks need to be de-programmed.
    1
  1291. Too much beard, hand waving, attitude.... insights still useful.
    1
  1292. Interesting content... ... but too much accent and drama in the voice. It would be easier to listen to if the text were read by MS Word.
    1
  1293.  @davidperrott5743  No. His difficult accent and exhausting inflections and voice-drama make for a difficult listening experience for North American English, which is the majority of English-speaking people. If MS Word read the text, we could get the information without struggling with the accent.
    1
  1294. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  1295. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  1296. Is he a lucky man, or what?
    1
  1297. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1298. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1299. This is obvious CCP propaganda and she is a CCP shill. This city is in TIBET -- not "China".
    1
  1300.  @Shive1337  How about the problem of this looking like a CCP shill piece?
    1
  1301. @HanJanssen-pg9jh ? "The cause doesn't matter?" ... Have you ever had a real job?
    1
  1302. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1303. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  1304. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  1305. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    1
  1306. This is what a shill for the murdererous CCP looks like.
    1
  1307. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  1308. Don't you hate the voices of these correspondents?
    1
  1309. Please get a less dramatic narrator.
    1
  1310. Load of cr*p.
    1
  1311. Awesome. Go MTG!
    1
  1312. Yup. 👌
    1
  1313. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1314. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1315. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1316. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1317. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1318. Yes. This is a stupid piece with a stupid point of view.
    1
  1319.  @trishabloomer9987  So what? So Tucker doesn't know about Aldi's. So what? He's taking you on a slice of life in Russia/Moscow where ordinary Russians live. What's so bad about that?
    1
  1320.  @premierpollo  Negative. This channel has the ones that have never had a real job.
    1
  1321. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  1322. Idiots.
    1
  1323. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  1324. Popeys... There's an "if you think it's bad now" moment.
    1
  1325. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    1
  1326. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    1
  1327. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1328. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1329. As much as we watch Peter Zeihan for his geopolitics, he is a never-had-a-real-job ivory tower elitist. He does not understand the American middle class, the American value of liberty, or what it's like to work for a living. He is the academic equivalent of Hollywood idiot-celebrity. Soon he'll be telling us how great it is to eat bugs. "Hey Peter! Please go spend a week under one of those windmills you think are so hippie-cool!"
    1
  1330. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  1331. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1332. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1333. Buy a cancer insurance policy.
    1
  1334. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    1
  1335.  @ivilivo  Sounds like you'd be happy in a worker's paradise like North Korea.
    1
  1336.  @ivilivo  Western civilization is under attack and the people on this post are too casual about it.
    1
  1337.  @ivilivo  It smells... like "cultural relativism".
    1
  1338.  @ivilivo  They didn't have a Roman/Western civilization to descend from.
    1
  1339.  @anonUK  I.e. Europe was a sh**ole after the collapse of the Roman Empire, and didn't recover 'til ... 1945? What if Rome lived all the way to 1945 and discharged its colonies like the British discharged theirs?
    1
  1340.  @leme5639  Higher than what?
    1
  1341. Like your job? Your self-indulgent fun while watching how the other half lives is alienating.
    1
  1342. Awesome. Well done and thanks for making.
    1
  1343. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  1344. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  1345. @petermarin8951  I did that. "Some people are just not cut out to be good YouTube narrators."
    1
  1346. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  1347. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  1348. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  1349.  @kaveh8425  Understood. We're being bullied into amputating the very thing that gives us standard of living above that of animals, if you include burning wood as "fossil fuel"... and these white-coat priests of human sacrifice can't give you a straight answer about how this "greenhouse gas" and "greenhouse effect" works.
    1
  1350.  @kaveh8425  Context: "Policy to control it being stupid ..." * * * I'm in the so-what/do-nothing approach to global warming (unless it's Thorium). So I think the whole thing is stupid (especially the batteries-not-included renewable boondoggles). What do you think is stupid GW policy?
    1
  1351.  @kaveh8425  Context: "... natural forces shall diminish our standard of living for us..." * With all due respect, that's horsesh*t. Human resourcefulness and work overcame the "nature problems" nature already posed ... it can handle the mountain-out-of-molehill couple degree increase in average temperature. "Give me a break!' I always end up asking this question here: do you have (ever had) a real job?
    1
  1352. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1353. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1354. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  1355. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  1356. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  1357. Does "CO2 emission" include termites?
    1
  1358. Next is gender.
    1
  1359. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  1360.  @jimluebke3869  That's a stupid concept. Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living through LOWER prices b/c of increased efficiency.
    1
  1361. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  1362.  @jimluebke3869  Sorry, but YAFOC. It's not complicated, it's simple. The people who try to complicate it are the cheats and swindlers of paper money.
    1
  1363.  @jimluebke3869  If the WJBrian speech is as narrowly focused as you say it is, then it's just that -- narrow, stupidly narrow. It looks like it's then taken Out Of Context by the paper money swindlers to say "Hey look! Ordinary people don't like gold!" <-- which the liars of academia are fully capable of doing.
    1
  1364.  @flyingmonkey3822  Please see my post about how paper money cheats the middle class and poor.
    1
  1365.  @chend9616  ^^ No! This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  1366.  @chend9616  "Inflation" and "deflation" are all, and only, about the quantity of money. A FIXED money supply will tend toward lower prices because people get MORE PRODUCTIVE, but that's not the same as "deflation". * Meanwhile, This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  1367.  @Frankenspank67  You don't want that on your social media record unless you want to work for a bunch of woke Femo-Fascist FLOOZIES.
    1
  1368. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    1
  1369. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1370. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1371. ​ @mbak7801  Are people shivering with those heat pumps?
    1
  1372. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    1
  1373. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  1374. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  1375. Very funny.
    1
  1376. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  1377. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  1378. Will you be leaving soon?
    1
  1379. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  1380.  @funshinebear4822  No. You can tell "Me me me me" pretty quick and it gets old and rude pretty fast.
    1
  1381.  @JoeTheLion60  He makes me sick and you probably have poor taste in people.
    1
  1382. @NigelHyphenJones Hey "hyphen"... this me-me-me video sucks.
    1
  1383. Don't like the used-car salesman voice and the keep-them-guessing structure of the "show". Good journalism answers the "5 Questions" in the first paragraph.
    1
  1384. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  1385. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    1
  1386. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1387. What was China's bizarre claim????
    1
  1388. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  1389. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1390. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1391. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  1392. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  1393. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1394. It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  1395.  @GallowglassVT  It's such a load of kurapp. These are Brits reverting back to animist druidism.
    1
  1396. @GallowglassVT  This level of "environmentalism" is a reversion back to animist, pagan Druidism. They're already doing the witch-burning with that stupid global warming.
    1
  1397.  @fvckingtest  In other words, we're just seeing the beginning of what they are capable of if they weren't governed by the monstrous see see pee.
    1
  1398. What about the harrassers outside conservative houses.
    1
  1399. Plastics aren't the problem, slobs are.
    1
  1400. 1) have YouTube show the Negative 👎 ratings 2) have the algorithm consider (a) the viewers negative ratings, (b) the video's negative ratings
    1
  1401. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  1402. Why is a country as dirt poor as India making trips to the moon?
    1
  1403.  @harishankarkandankumarath9922  When a country has millions of people living in third world squalor, don't lecture the rest of us about your upward mobility while pissing away resources on space shots. It is an insult to the humanity of both rich and poor countries.
    1
  1404. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1405. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1406. Min 4:15 Isn't that the same scene shown earlier, but from a different angle?
    1
  1407. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  1408. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  1409. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    1
  1410.  @Joe-Dead  See the long Kirk Sorensen video on thorium, "kiddo".
    1
  1411. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1412. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  1413. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    1
  1414. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  1415. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  1416. Yes, they still have to be there to provide base load for this KID'S LEMONADE STAND business.
    1
  1417. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  1418. Is this guy a cshmuk or is it just me?
    1
  1419. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  1420. Hard to understand. Too much accent and mic could be better.
    1
  1421. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    1
  1422. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  1423. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1424. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  1425. Yes, he is.
    1
  1426. This guy sounds like one of those CCP shills.
    1
  1427. Companies don't have to mfg in China.
    1
  1428.  @NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth  Right! I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1429. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 ..
    1
  1430. RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  1431. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  1432. Great videos! Could you post a bio of yourself on the About page? I/we'd like to know where you got the money to live the "Anthony Bordaign" (sp?) lifestyle you're living in these videos. Thanks for making. 👍
    1
  1433. "Right on the money" - thanks! But presentationally, could use less gesticulation, more simple screen charts and illustrations, and a generally less-dark screen. (Money GPS has good presentation format.) Sorry, my stupid cell phone keyboard has a mind of its own.
    1
  1434.  @retroxtiger  Isn't Christian church-burning the new normal for Europe?
    1
  1435. What is "p-hacking"?
    1
  1436. Has he done one on data fraud from the witch doctors of climate quackery? Like the IPCC?
    1
  1437. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  1438. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1439. How about a weapons payload?
    1
  1440. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  1441. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1442. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  1443.  @johnlacey3857  g.s. 1) you attacked first with your NPR patronizing. 2) opposition to legitimate economic wealth creation is a sign of elitist barbarism. 3) get a real job.
    1
  1444.  @johnlacey3857  Not necessarily a real job. Shysters and opportunists can make lots of money.
    1
  1445. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  1446. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1447.  @trowawayacc  1) CO2 is not a pollutant. 2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. 3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model. 5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition. 6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of. 7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  1448. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  1449. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1450. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  1451. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  1452. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1453. It's the Rice Paddies: rice is not a "feast or famine" production system. Do your work, and you'll have a steady supply of food. In that situation, "stocking up" and gaining weight in case of leaner times is counter productive - can't afford to be carrying all that weight around, hence bodies with little fat-storage capacity.
    1
  1454. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1455. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1456. Does anyone hate these dipsh*t self-important msm stories?
    1
  1457. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  1458. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  1459. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1460. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  1461.  @tractortalkwithgary1271  "Stop complaining, start fixing."
    1
  1462. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  1463. Sorry, no -- like Ron DeSantis, he's laying the groundwork for 2028. He's 37. He'll be around in 2028, but Trump won't. It hurts him big-time if he were to attack Trump.
    1
  1464. Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .
    1
  1465. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1466. Too bad the camera doesn't just stay on the slides (!) and instead unnecessarily follows the speaker. Only the audio is necessary from the speaker. The visual is distracting.
    1
  1467. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1468. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1469. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  1470. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1471. "Global Warming" is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.) https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb8gGZ_aIPisY3DAj5WIUOLD&si=8pBUBMFcbYD9xOIn  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1472. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  1473. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1474. Tax subsidized "cool people" welfare.
    1
  1475. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  1476. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  1477.  @Cythil  Everyone benefits from fossil fuel, so I'm not buying into that, if that's what you mean.
    1
  1478.  @Funkywallot  Thank you. We need reality bits for these gee-whiz conversations.
    1
  1479.  @Cythil  Look up what condescending elitism is somewhere outside your echo chamber.
    1
  1480.  @Cythil  I am serious. Religious fanatics like you will do to the west what prioritizing cows over people did to India.
    1
  1481.  @Cythil  Spare me. Get a real job instead. Then come talk to me about "externalities".
    1
  1482.  @Cythil  Tell me yours, and I'll tell you why it isn't.
    1
  1483.  @Cythil  People who have real jobs know what they are, and know when they're talking to people who don't. Besides, YOU"RE the economist, with your "externalities". Besides.... you're from stupid Sweden -- THAT explains it.
    1
  1484. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  1485. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1486. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  1487. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  1488. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1489.  @gordenrussell7266  Fusion is a great big BOONDOGGLE, right? Just like renewable energy.
    1
  1490. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1491. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1492.  @WakefieldTolbert  Link?
    1
  1493.  @WakefieldTolbert  Yes, I looked her up and her climate superstition song and dance.
    1
  1494.  @WakefieldTolbert  I posted a sh*t sheet 3 pages long.
    1
  1495.  @crinolynneendymion8755  Did you see my multi-page post?
    1
  1496.  @WakefieldTolbert  "All that"?
    1
  1497.  @WakefieldTolbert  Just for yuks and giggles, Is WOOD sequestered CO2?
    1
  1498. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  1499.  @futurehofer1564  1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1500. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  1501.  @cunix8721  The West did a piss-poor job of managing post cold war Europe. See George Friedman on The Intermarium alliance.
    1
  1502.  @andersbjrnsen7203  Semantics. A distinction without a difference. The West did a piss-poor job of managing post cold war Europe.
    1
  1503. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  1504. !
    1
  1505. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  1506. RN is an idiot.
    1
  1507.  Jim Barr  No, The Devil is.
    1
  1508. No, - Britain didn't join the euro. - The problems are from are from the Fed's raising interest rates, British pensions going bust, BOE about-facing with "don't worry, we'll buy all your bonds." - Britain's return to prosperity after its stupid socialism was North Sea oil and Margaret Thatcher.
    1
  1509. I wish he didn't... have... such... a... staccato... voice...
    1
  1510. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  1511. After seeing the FOOTPRINT of that stupid wind farm on coastal property, I'm thinking "those high-tension power lines are starting to look pretty good."
    1
  1512. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  1513. Yes, informative indeed.
    1
  1514. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  1515.  @alexandradane3672  Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  1516. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  1517. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  1518. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  1519. Well done, but... I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  1520. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  1521. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  1522. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  1523. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  1524. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    1
  1525. No, the Russian middle class does not want this war, so Peter should stop putting words in their mouth.
    1
  1526. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1527. Trump won. The 2020 election was stolen. Arizona, Wisconsin partial audits conclusion: DECERTIFY. Jan 6th <--- FBI, Nancy Pelosi, DC setup. Re: Ray Epps. Jan 6th arrestees <--- political prisoners. Jan 6th hearings <--- Stalinist show trial and a load of crap.
    1
  1528. Ha! In other words, it's a BOONDOGGLE! Are you sure you're not a Trump supporter?
    1
  1529. Go Kanye and Candace!
    1
  1530. This is for math whizzes, not for the average math student. It gallops from one dense math sentences to another in "gee isn't it fun to be so smart " fashion. Delivery would be improved if there was more pacing to the audio.
    1
  1531. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  1532.  @michaelplunkett8059  Zeihan drank the Kool aid of the global warming quackery.
    1
  1533. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  1534. Your accent is getting "better", less thick. Very good! Whatever you've been doing about accent, I think it's working. 👍
    1
  1535. Absolutely.
    1
  1536. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  1537. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  1538. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  1539. Well said, JD!
    1
  1540. Who is she questioning first here?
    1
  1541. That's what fast food is for, for God's sake. Worry about something important!
    1
  1542. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  1543. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  1544.  @RonaldJohnson-p4r  America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth??
    1
  1545.  @RonaldJohnson-p4r  Water in the Great Lakes gets p*ssed away over Niagara Falls. Water in the Southwest turns into billlions of dollars in added GDP. Stop being so NPR selfish.
    1
  1546. Yorktown Heights is $wealthy Westchester County.
    1
  1547. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1548. How about scale? What does it take to get a gigawatt of electricity from them?
    1
  1549. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his speaking gigs.
    1
  1550. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1551.  @dominicfucinari1942  The number of people who will benefit from $60 billion dollar's worth of copper is in the 10s of millions. (As opposed to a few surly tree-huggers like the ones on this blog.)
    1
  1552.  @farrahupson  Get a real job.
    1
  1553.  @notacreativehandle  You should get one too.
    1
  1554.  @notacreativehandle  You should get a real job too -- one that doesn't use any copper.
    1
  1555.  @Bludgeoned2DEATH2  This is a horse's a-- channel.
    1
  1556. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  1557. @phydid98155  Get a real job.
    1
  1558. Your accent is getting "better", less thick. Very good! Whatever you've been doing about accent, I think it's working. 👍
    1
  1559.  @Jack_Redview  I think $10-20 lapel mics would take care of it. That's all.
    1
  1560. This is obvious CCP propaganda and she is a CCP shill. This city is in TIBET -- not "China".
    1
  1561. Spare us the bucolic utopia of life on $2 million dollars worth of ranch land.
    1
  1562.  @pelonconstante6271  No preference. It's the "oh isn't the simple ranching life wonderful" attitude that makes me sick. He doesn't mention the $2million entry fee.
    1
  1563.  @PBRRoughStockRanch  Spare us the bucolic utopia of life on $2 million dollars worth of ranch land.
    1
  1564.  @PBRRoughStockRanch  ^^ missed the whole point.
    1
  1565.  @PBRRoughStockRanch  👌
    1
  1566.  @ragheadand420roll  Spare us the bucolic utopia cr*p of life on $2 million dollars worth of ranch land.
    1
  1567. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1568. Can't take the voice after a while.
    1
  1569. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    1
  1570.  @ninefox344  HALEU?
    1
  1571. Cost shifting to non-solar users, i.e. poor people.
    1
  1572. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  1573. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1574. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    1
  1575. This is a fluff piece and a disingenuous click-bait title. This video does NOT say "how billionaires control elections". If it did, it would talk about MARK ZUCKERBERG and the underhanded Ballot Harvesting that stole the 2020 election from Donal Trump. (and gave us Ukraine, inflation, Afghanistan, China breathing down Taiwan's neck)
    1
  1576. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  1577.  @ronw76  ? There was a plan for one "back in the day". Where would be the best place to spend "that kind of money"?
    1
  1578.  @LuvBorderCollies  In other words, you're having a good day, by your standards. 😆
    1
  1579.  @LuvBorderCollies  So the concern is about HYDRO -power? What? Don't you know we live in the age of renewable energy? If that's they're only beef, then I'm not buying it. I've looked at the numbers -- Missouri River can spare 4 million acre feet without breaking a sweat. "Make the desert bloom, again!"
    1
  1580. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  1581.  @ALCAN52  Awesome. Thanks.
    1
  1582.  @ALCAN52  I can't find any articles that supports that. Do you have any links?
    1
  1583.  @ALCAN52  I looked at both links couldn't find confirmation of that policy. Here's the first paragraph of the Bloomberg article. It says "write DOWN of mortgages... to inflation" It should be "write UP to inflation" if debt is indexed to the CPI, correct? Am I getting the direction wrong? Should the sentence have been written "... linked to DEFLATION"? Excerpt: Iceland has announced plans to write down mortgages linked to inflation by 150 billion kronur ($1.25 billion) to speed the nation’s recovery after economic collapse in 2008
    1
  1584.  @ALCAN52  Well then it's the fault of the communicaTOR not the communicaTEE. Indexing debt to inflation is almost like abolishing central banking. If that's what iceland did, they did a good job of hiding it from the world.
    1
  1585. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  1586. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  1587. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1588. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.😊
    1
  1589. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  1590. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  1591. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  1592. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1593. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1594. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1595. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  1596. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1597. Hey Peter -- how did it feel going back to "the real world"?
    1
  1598. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1599. The 1960 Presidential election was smelly (Chicago and LBJ's Texas).
    1
  1600. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  1601. Stolen election in 2020, ... Trojan horse in 2024
    1
  1602. The world? Japan had a STOP THE STEAL march.
    1
  1603. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1604. Who is she questioning first here?
    1
  1605. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1606. Quanset Huts, right?
    1
  1607. Crap.
    1
  1608. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  1609. Absolutely.
    1
  1610. Are these power failures due to the EPA rules about using bunker fuel?
    1
  1611. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  1612. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  1613. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1614. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1615. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  1616.  @ThomasJr  Yeah... lot of lung cancer from the millenniums of humans how survived cold next to campfires.
    1
  1617. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1618. Boondoggles, anyone? Remember that stupid 70s fad-project, ”the power tower"?
    1
  1619. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  1620. See Peter Zeihan videos.
    1
  1621. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1622. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  1623. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  1624. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1625.  @MeeesterBond17  Get a real job.
    1
  1626. Well done! Thanks.
    1
  1627. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  1628. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  1629. Good job. Thanks.
    1
  1630. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  1631.  @Trgn  Are you a CCP shill?
    1
  1632. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  1633.  @john-ss8hk  CCP shill?
    1
  1634.  @lowkatherine  Does that apply to the thugs of the CCP?
    1
  1635.  @lowkatherine  You show incredibly poor citizenship. "No wonder China is such a political sh*thole."
    1
  1636. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  1637. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  1638. I'm so sorry. America has a hellish legal climate.
    1
  1639. Wrong about Trump running on all-charisma/no-policy. He had both. For policy it was Wall, Deregulation, conservative Scotus, make snooty-Europe pay its NATO bills, ....
    1
  1640. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  1641. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1642. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1643. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    1
  1644. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  1645. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  1646. @CC-ns2ds  Where did they get it?
    1
  1647. @CC-ns2ds  I bet they got it from China.
    1
  1648. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1649. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1650. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  1651. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1652.  @Michaelw777.52  "I'm liking it." :)
    1
  1653. Trump was right.
    1
  1654. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1655. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1656. Globalist drivel.
    1
  1657. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  1658. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  1659. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  1660. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  1661. Gross hearsay. Grossly political.
    1
  1662. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  1663. Fluff piece.
    1
  1664. Bankruptcy would be great for China --- all those empty apartments filling up with poor people for pennies on the dollar!
    1
  1665.  @stephenhowes6509  👍👍👍
    1
  1666. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1667. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1668. Ukraine.
    1
  1669. Too much exaggeration in the audio, exaggeration at points that don't call for it.
    1
  1670. Very good, but it's for math "cool people". It's not for average math talent that wants to learn Taylor Series.
    1
  1671. It's a hoax. The whole premise of AGW -- the greenhouse effect -- is wrong. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8 https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/climate-change-banned-words/art-climate-change?utm_source=Breakthrough+Newsletters&utm_campaign=12e6304fed-BTI_Weekly_1_18_2023_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_49b872540e-12e6304fed-466887052 If heat rises, why is it so cold in the upper atmosphere? https://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae670.cfm
    1
  1672. Yeah. Don't hold your breath. The condensed matter battery was "the game changer". I hope it is. But it was "just around the corner" maybe 6 months ago. Now he's talking about sulfide-something-or-other. I watched this video looking for an update on condensed matter batteries, but instead got another new-fangled something-or-other. Disappointed, but will continue watching.
    1
  1673. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  1674.  @ianseaweed  Hydrogen dioxide? (H2o?)
    1
  1675.  @ianseaweed  "Refract" means bend. Does "refract" mean "scatter'? What happens to an IR photon when when it hits a co2?
    1
  1676. BTW, I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1677.  @ianseaweed  Context: "... significant increase ... make life less hospitable..." ^^ The rest of us hear the smugness and conceit in remarks like that. I suppose removing hydrocarbons from the economy is going to have NO effect on how "hospitable" life is. ... People like YOU won't be the one pulling the rickshaws. You are a piss poor citizen.
    1
  1678. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  1679. Is this guy a schmuck, or is it just me?
    1
  1680. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  1681. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  1682. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  1683. Does anyone understand WHY HKers are doing what they're doing? It's poor (or manipulative) journalism when they tell you a lot of WHAT is going on (HKers shopping in Shenzen), but no WHY they're doing it. Is this channel a CCP shill? There's lots of those around.
    1
  1684. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    1
  1685. Great science-project work if you can get it. Such a superficial fluff piece.
    1
  1686. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1687. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  1688. Legal Americans are supposed to be partial to illegal immigrants?
    1
  1689. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1690. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  1691. Woman is saying "what's good for a few companies (Coke and Apple) is more important than "soul" or strategic Western interest. Disgusting.
    1
  1692. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    1
  1693.  @KarlEmanuel-f4l  Please renounce your citizenship and move to North Korea.
    1
  1694. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1695. Is this guy a cshmuk or is it just me?
    1
  1696. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1697. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1698. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1699. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  1700. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1701. @beerye3  How do you think this pointless self-indulgent crap sounds to someone who has to stand by a cash register 10 hours a day just to make rent?
    1
  1702.  @ousamadearudesuwa  Do you have a real job?
    1
  1703.  @ousamadearudesuwa  People with real jobs don't talk like you.
    1
  1704. Negative on this one. 1) Nancy Mace was on of the Gaetz Eight that ousted Kevin McCarthy. 2) She got it right with the Hunter Biden stunt -- he was spitting in the face of the Congressional Oversight Committee, and hence the American people.
    1
  1705. Get tired of the sing-songy narration.
    1
  1706. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1707. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1708. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  1709.  @fredfunn5413  ^^ FOS.
    1
  1710.  homeli7027  Are you a CCP shill?
    1
  1711. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  1712. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  1713. Duuuuunmmmbbb. Somebody show Bill Gates the Thorium videos. [And you don't see Japan doing any of this "green" crap.
    1
  1714.  @matthewm5074  Thorium is so abundant they call it "burning dirt".
    1
  1715. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1716. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  1717. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  1718. It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  1719. It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  1720. Well done interview.
    1
  1721.  @wiseguy8468  👍👍👍 In other words, co2 is glorified humidity. Sorry, but "anthro" climate change is not credible. It is 21st century superstition. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  1722. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  1723.  @mrleenudler  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? * This is typical of the double-talk I get for an answer. It's a simple question! Where are all those white-coat know-it-alls who are so quick to tell us "the science is settled"?
    1
  1724.  @mrleenudler    Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? Because it's a political issue and these white-coat witch doctors are out to inflict human sacrifices, creep. Your arrogance is disgusting. Simple questions can usually unravel these "it's too complicated for youuu" arguments, and indeed it has. I can't get a straight answer because the whole narrative falls apart with the answer.
    1
  1725.  @mrleenudler  In other words, you're a climate hustler.
    1
  1726. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  1727. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1728. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1729. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  1730. Negative on this one. 1) Nancy Mace was on of the Gaetz Eight that ousted Kevin McCarthy. 2) She got it right with the Hunter Biden stunt -- he was spitting in the face of the Congressional Oversight Committee, and hence the American people.
    1
  1731. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1732. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1733. Joe Biden on tape making Ukraine arrangements in January 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NIicf9xVEQ&feature=youtu.be
    1
  1734. thank you. but too much accent and sing-song the voice. for what a good narration voice sounds like, see peter zeihan videos.
    1
  1735. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1736. RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  1737. This video is such a load of it.
    1
  1738. @ArkadiosTheodulus  Yes. It's called "the smoke filled room".
    1
  1739. "I can hear the rules being written for ship and plane guns."
    1
  1740. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  1741. Absolutely!
    1
  1742. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  1743. "Solution: More government" typical MSM-fake news crap.
    1
  1744. Sure! -- government by big-mouth, know-it-all fake-news media --- just what Houston needs. What a field day for the intelligentsia elites and more make-work cushy jobs for the bureaucrats. Just what Houston needs -- more government, and some obnoxious tax-paid bureaucrat busy-bodying over everybody else with the "open spaces". That's it! That's what Houston needs -- open spaces! i.e. no people -- hey! aren't I smart! Can I get a cushy job with a pension telling people not to move to Houston?
    1
  1745. BTW -- take your open spaces and stick it up your a-- because Houston has poor drainage to begin with, re: soil type; so please shut up with your open spaces, you obnoxious know-it-alls and your allies and buddies in the fake-news media.
    1
  1746. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  1747. But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  1748. This is obvious CCP propaganda and she is a CCP shill. This city is in TIBET -- not "China".
    1
  1749. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  1750.  @himbeertoni08  In other words, co2 is glorified humidity. Sorry, but "anthro" climate change is not credible. It is 21st century superstition. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  1751. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  1752. So, co2 is glorified humidity, right?
    1
  1753. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  1754.  @himbeertoni08  Context: Medieval Warm Period (MWP) How do you know MWP was only in the northern hemisphere? Were there weather stations in South America in 900? When has there ever been a "we're farming in Greenland but it's cold as hell in Texas" period? * * *
    1
  1755.  @himbeertoni08  Context: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain? * * * Oceans? What happens to the co2 when rain lands on the ocean? And if rain has very little effect on washing out co2, why is it said it's causing such a problem with making the ocean less basic?
    1
  1756. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  1757. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1758.  @himbeertoni08  The idiots of "climate change" mistake hypotheses ("models") for conclusions. They're not. Their models are crap when put up against the scientific method and compared to the experimental data (as long as they're not cheating on the data). They are as predictive as the neighborhood palm reader, and used to bully the public into stupid "green energy" boondoggles.
    1
  1759. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1760. Too much accent.
    1
  1761. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  1762. Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    1
  1763. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1764. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  1765. Sorry, but I think climate change is crap. For one, there were several BIG "climate changes" in the mere blink-of-an-eye window of recorded human history. One of them was the Medieval Warm Periods. Was that caused by SUVs? What's wrong with this picture? Here we have a PhD physicist who has to go back to the books for hour to investigate the science of what these snake-oil climate hustlers are saying (which I'm sure THEY haven't done). What she found was a shaggy dog story that has to go 3 levels deep, and THEN still ends with, "there still a lot of complications in this theory..." And at the end of it, I don't understand this "balance" stuff. Do any of YOU? It the space of two sentences we get "the earth has to get hotter because the stratosphere (beginning at 33,000 feet) got 1-2 degrees colder..." The politics of that are "Now! You peasants! Submit to a 25% reduction in your standard of living and pay up it taxes for trillions of dollars in stupid "green energy" BOONDOGGLES! (Ms. Sabin is German. Germany doesn't have such a good track record in the totality of "green energy" stuff -- either with its performance (see Peter Zeihan), or its making itself dependent on Russian natural gas.) How many of YOU understand this "balance" stuff? Climate change is 21st century superstition -- any bad weather event is YOUR FAULT because YOU drove that evil ICE. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  1766. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  1767. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  1768. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  1769.  @crawkn  I can't get straight answers to my simple questions. I get BS double talk.
    1
  1770.  @crawkn  Echo chamber... Echo chamber...
    1
  1771.  @crawkn  You've never heard of - nor able to deal with - "the devil's advocate". You want your aggressive dogma and agenda accepted at face value, which makes you a disgusting person.
    1
  1772.  @crawkn  ?
    1
  1773.  @crawkn  LOL. "Can I help you pull the shoe out of your mouth?"
    1
  1774. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1775. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  1776.  @crawkn  Horsesh*t. The NET carbon reduction of those is trivial. It's all for eco-pagan feel-goodery and to avoid getting a real job. If you're going to have any effect on cliimate, you have to MAKE THE BASTARDS PULL RICKSHAWS.
    1
  1777.  @crawkn  Cheap? That shows the corruption inherent in this racket. Force up the price of conventional to make kids-lemonade-stand batteries-not-included look good. Making things more expensive is something government is very good at.
    1
  1778.  @crawkn  "Oil companies subsidized..." <--- stupid party line. Meanwhile... Keystone pipeline?
    1
  1779.  @crawkn  That's because you live in an echo chamber.
    1
  1780.  @crawkn  My points are obvious if you have a real job and haven't drunk the echo chamber Koolaid of climate change. To make any difference YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE BASTARDS PULL RICKSHAWS!
    1
  1781.  @crawkn  You have as much business sense as AOC.
    1
  1782.  @crawkn  ^^ Any renewable-energy advocate who fingers hydro-carbons as being subsidized is a Koolaid-inebriated fool or a liar.
    1
  1783.  @crawkn  That stupid Economist Magazine: https://youtu.be/k9HYR5zAZWE
    1
  1784.  @crawkn  Germany? You mean Stupid Germany and its national energy feel-good joke policy that made it dependent on those great guys from Russia? ROFL
    1
  1785. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1786. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1787. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  1788. No, Styxx, you're dead wrong in this one. American fast food is the envy of the world's malnourished, and American intake thereof is NOT a problem for anyone who isn't already overweight. ... Plenty of more important things to worry about.
    1
  1789. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1790. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1791. Fantastic!
    1
  1792. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  1793. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  1794. @reubenj.cogburn8546  You can turn up the speed. That's what I do. His acoustics and enunciations are good. I turn it up to 2x without loss.
    1
  1795. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  1796. What is DRM?
    1
  1797. We all love the 2CV. The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food -- it's a baseline. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option? Citroen AMI: The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations. But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels. The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari". It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!). How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car??? Burton 2CV Parts: This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts. They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway? This video makes it look like it can: Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut). It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds. Rust is a problem? Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust. Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration. I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms. (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.
    1
  1798. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  1799. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1800. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  1801. CO2/climate-change: the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  1802. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  1803. No, he's wrong about the basics: inflammation is the creation of money, period.
    1
  1804. RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  1805. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  1806. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1807. Fun video!
    1
  1808. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  1809. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  1810. How do you get that "glowing charcoal brickette" to send its infrared to a quarter-football-field of TVPs?
    1
  1811.  @CorePathway  You're as much of a twit as he is.
    1
  1812.  @CorePathway  Yes, I'm not surprised. Twerps like you think alike.
    1
  1813. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  1814. Are these power failures due to the EPA rules about using bunker fuel?
    1
  1815. It's the Mamas and the Papas, but that's just a detail.
    1
  1816. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1817. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  1818. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  1819. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    1
  1820. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  1821. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1822. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1823. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  1824. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  1825. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    1
  1826. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1827. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1828. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  1829. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1830.  @sayitlikeitis8759  In the EU, you are a subject, not a citizen. Ditch the whole thing!
    1
  1831. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  1832. Figure out how to synthesize/manufacture glucose and carbohydrates and you've eliminated the need for 70% farming.
    1
  1833. Can't take the con-artist tone of voice.
    1
  1834. Can't take the voice. (Just have MS Word read the text.)
    1
  1835. Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The IPCC climate fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s
    1
  1836.  @superstormthunder3  HS.
    1
  1837.  @superstormthunder3  You paid absolutely no attention to the IPCC fraud.
    1
  1838.  @superstormthunder3  I watched 3/4. A load of crap on many levels. #1 there is no "global warming" Take the fraud out of IPCC and there is none. #2 ... #3 ... You are a peddler if superstition.
    1
  1839. It's simple -- it's a fad.
    1
  1840. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  1841. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1842. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 ..
    1
  1843. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  1844. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  1845.  @alexanderheyworth3242  Insignificantly radioactive. Wet scrubbers remove 95% of particulate matter.
    1
  1846. Sorry, I'm not getting this concept of of "collateral shortage". Not making sense to me. I'm seeing reverse repo as just a somewhat-desperate attempt to reduce money supply to quell inflation without raising interest rates. Where does collateral shortage come into it?
    1
  1847. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  1848. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  1849. Too much accent.
    1
  1850. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1851. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1852. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant.  CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  1853. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  1854. This is a stupid piece with a stupid point of view.
    1
  1855. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1856. Ok. It's the cash value of the offer. Obama doesn't understand America, so how can he love it? But the cash value of the offer should be worth it to President Trump.
    1
  1857. Bravo! Bravo! and Bravo again! Run for Governor, Lou! ** Has Mike Rowe contacted you, or vice versa? You two would be a natural together. God bless - great work!
    1
  1858. Operation Gang Rape
    1
  1859.  @ralphthomas5448  Of course not. What DHS is doing should be called Operation Gang Rape. Deliberate refusal to enforce the law is impeachable. (Desantis showed the way with that POS prosecutor.)
    1
  1860.  @turboturtle5575  Secretary of Gang Rape.
    1
  1861.  @xerxes2044  He's always been personally condescending about Donald Trump, which probably plays well with the condescending deep-state Beltway "foreign policy establishment" -- which DJT says he'd "get rid of" (good).
    1
  1862. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  1863. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1864. He hasn't been let out in NO BAIL yet?
    1
  1865. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    1
  1866. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  1867. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  1868. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1869. Didn't/don't have a clue what he was talking about. The average YouTuber is supposed to know what a pinion nut is?
    1
  1870. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  1871. Too fast for me; too many "light hearted hops and skips" where I have to stop the video and go "what"?
    1
  1872. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  1873. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1874. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  1875. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  1876. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  1877. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1878. Yes! Great news!
    1
  1879. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  1880.  @warrick7689  I wouldn't tell the Wright brothers anything because they were spending their own money. You've been "had" by the quacks and charlatans of fusion. * 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation -- 10,000,000 degrees operating temperature. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. (600 degrees operating temperature.) Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly spend???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. It that's how these propeller-head science geeks feel about it, THEY CAN WRITE THE CHECK. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  1881. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  1882. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1883. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1884. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  1885. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  1886.  @annaclarafenyo8185  1) With all due respect, you don't get to tell me what's important and what isn't in terms of questions.
    1
  1887.  @annaclarafenyo8185    So "scatter" is what's really happening when the climate-advocates say "absorbs" or "traps"
    1
  1888.  @burgesspark685  What is "logarithmic restriction of co2 absorption"?
    1
  1889. Would radium-dial watches be a useful analogy in this discussion?
    1
  1890.  @annaclarafenyo8185  What do you mean "insincere"?
    1
  1891.  @annaclarafenyo8185  BTW, I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1892.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Getting paid by a think tank? I wish. But now that you mention it, I don't like the arrogance and abrasiveness with which the AWG argument is expected to be taken at face value, in the face of obvious objections like 1) co2 makes up 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. (I can't get a straight answer here.) 2) The have been 3 warm periods just within recorded human history that have been much warmer than today's climate that weren't caused by SUVs (makes today's warming look trivial). And I can't get a straight answer here either.
    1
  1893.  @burgesspark685  Thank you. I keep hearing "absorb" and "scatter". Are they the same? If different, could you elaborate?
    1
  1894.  @burgesspark685  So "scatter" actually means "absorbed and re-emitted"?
    1
  1895.  @burgesspark685  Ok, thanks. Now could you connect/relate that to "logarithmic co2 something-or-other" you mentioned in an earlier post? ^^ Nevermind -- I reread your earlier post. If/when co2 is at IR saturation, an IR photon will pass by it on its way out to space, correct?
    1
  1896. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  1897. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1898. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  1899. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1900. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1901. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1902. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  1903. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  1904. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  1905. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  1906. Why is Taiwan in "red" in the maps?
    1
  1907. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  1908. A primer on climate quackery "Carbon emmission pollution" is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE! CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005. Trace gases DO NOT control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI
    1
  1909. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  1910. Why so much gesticulation in the millennial songs and dances?
    1
  1911. How about Moldova for ruralness?
    1
  1912. F--- Cuba.
    1
  1913. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  1914. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  1915. Sorry -- too much accent. Would be better just to have an MSword or Adobe PDF just read the text.
    1
  1916. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  1917. Is he on that stupid non-GMO bandwagon?
    1
  1918.  @docbrown6550  I kinda-like Two Bit, but he's got a lot of that floozy college-sophomore twerp in him, e.g., "sustainable" and "climate change". He is the "he" I'm referring to in my post. I should have specified.
    1
  1919. What bragging rights! Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    1
  1920. Will you be happy when the CCP gets hypersonic nuclear missiles? Directed energy weapons? Were you happy when the CCP got thermonuclear capability?
    1
  1921. Yes, WGAS about this clickbait video?
    1
  1922. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    1
  1923. Who's the clown, Trump or the presenter? If it's the presenter, I agree.
    1
  1924. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  1925. Go Rudy!
    1
  1926. WhTF is Max Boot? And why does he get any press?
    1
  1927. No, - Britain didn't join the euro. - The problems are from are from the Fed's raising interest rates, British pensions going bust, BOE about-facing with "don't worry, we'll buy all your bonds." - Britain's return to prosperity after its stupid socialism was North Sea oil and Margaret Thatcher.
    1
  1928. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  1929. Europe is degenerate and condescending with its welfarism which is paid for by American defense spending.
    1
  1930. Interesting - thanks.
    1
  1931. There already is a pipeline. It's called a railroad.
    1
  1932. America used to be a can-do place. Now it's PBS "conservation and efficiency". Tighten your belts! You groveling peasants!
    1
  1933. "As a native of California...." OMG.
    1
  1934. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  1935. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  1936. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  1937. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  1938. These should be available for all schools that receive tax money.
    1
  1939.  @AVPVideoProducts  Noooo.... these floods happen every 100 years. That's not 'often', but they do happen and they are not "unprecedented". FEMA and everyone else should be prepared for them.
    1
  1940. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  1941. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  1942. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  1943. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  1944. Can't take the accent.
    1
  1945. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  1946.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  ... Then what's all this yammering about "acidification" of the ocean? (A snake-oil manipulative term, given that the ocean is basic (8.x))
    1
  1947.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  Did you factor in air density - (quite a bit denser at sea level than at rain cloud level).
    1
  1948.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  8.1 pH of seawater is basic, not acidic. To call it "acidic" a mob-inciting lie.
    1
  1949.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  Context: pH of 8.1 is basic, not acidic. Calling it "acidic" is a mob-inciting lie. * * * An ocean that's becoming less basic and more neutral (niether acidic or basic, i.e., tap water) is not something I worry about, however acidic-deceptive and mob-inciting the rhetoric from the climate hustlers may be.
    1
  1950.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  Context: clams can't handle slightly less basic seawater. * * * That's from Woods Hole??? That's not another existence-justifying government bureaucracy like NOAA, EPA, and DOE?
    1
  1951. Is this guy a cshmuk or is it just me?
    1
  1952. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  1953. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  1954. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  1955. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  1956. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  1957. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  1958. It's hard to listen to your voice. Any chance you could make a copy of this where MS Word or PDF reads the text?
    1
  1959. Try Frank Tipler. (Search on playlists.)
    1
  1960. Don't like the ethical cynicism.
    1
  1961.  @b.griffin317  Don't think about what My country does in My name? I hope you don't work for the state department. With an attitude like that you'd be considered un-American.
    1
  1962. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  1963.  @brucefrykman8295  ^^ Priceless. Copy this and send it to all your woke-idiot friends.
    1
  1964. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  1965.  @markcalhoun8219  Screw you. If that stupid kids-lemonade-stand "renewables" were so great, the entrepreneurs themselves would be out there doing it. But try explaining that to idiots like AOC.
    1
  1966. What is "p-hacking"?
    1
  1967. Has he done one on data fraud from the witch doctors of climate quackery? Like the IPCC?
    1
  1968. Am I hearing another "me me me me" video? (Or is it just 'me'?) [Who is this guy?]
    1
  1969. How much is the taxpayer getting screwed for these redundant, unnecessary, superstition-driven gee whiz schemes?
    1
  1970. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  1971. What would pay-back-years be if California had national average electricity rates?
    1
  1972. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  1973.  @waynemasters8673  "Oh! How clever!" You show yourself to be a 3rd world excrementalist.
    1
  1974.  @waynemasters8673  No apologies here. If you can't see the corruption in the Trump persecutions, you don't belong in a civilized country.
    1
  1975.  @timrhatley  Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives it his usual elitist, condescending short shrift.
    1
  1976. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  1977. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  1978. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  1979. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  1980. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  1981. Can't China just thermo-baric bomb all of Taiwan till it's bombed into submission, like Mariupol?
    1
  1982. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  1983. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  1984. 15 minutes in: pure cr*p. This man is an ignorant fool - does he even mention the CAUSE of the Great Depression? Namely, THE FEDERAL RESERVE? (Ditto for Subprime.) Dumb Dumb Dumb.
    1
  1985.  @youtuber6185  15 minutes in: pure cr*p. This man is an ignorant fool - does he even mention the CAUSE of the Great Depression? Namely, THE FEDERAL RESERVE? (Ditto for Subprime.) Dumb Dumb Dumb.
    1
  1986.  @MrSparkums  Time to claw back the stolen wealth of inflation and abolish the Fed.
    1
  1987. @K Korona In other words "vote yourself rich". How disgusting.
    1
  1988. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  1989. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  1990. Stupid Jim Acosta.
    1
  1991. Lot of stuff here, what we can expect from Me. Ziehan.
    1
  1992. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  1993. Interesting and well done.
    1
  1994. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  1995. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  1996. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  1997.  @Sevenine88  American education? LOL! 😂 😆
    1
  1998. It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  1999.  @YorkGod1  It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  2000. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2001. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2002. Is this guy a schmuck, or is it just me?
    1
  2003. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2004. Global warming is to energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2005. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2006. How do you get that "glowing charcoal brickette" to send its infrared to a quarter-football-field of TVPs?
    1
  2007. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2008. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  2009.  @haraldbredsdorff2699  Have you looked the definition of "sleazy" lately?
    1
  2010.  @khlorghaal  I take you've made great contributions to the betterment of mankind.
    1
  2011. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2012. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2013. Is co2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2014. What is co2 besides glorified humidity?
    1
  2015. @D R GW is where the screw-the-middle-class tax boondoggles.
    1
  2016. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  2017. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  2018. Would radium-dial watches be a useful analogy in this discussion?
    1
  2019.  @cdunne1620  I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2020. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    1
  2021. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2022. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  2023. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  2024. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2025.  @snek9353  Can you add some more negatives?
    1
  2026.  @olivierbensa590  Sabine or YouTube deletes earlier/more-pointed versions of this I post. "Climate change" is a religion to these pagans.
    1
  2027.  @enderwiggin1113  Post links for all your assertions please.
    1
  2028.  @enderwiggin1113  1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  2029.  @enderwiggin1113  1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  2030.  @YourInvestmentAdvise   CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2031. Lot of accent. Need better audio.
    1
  2032. Hey Jeffrey - is LIBERTY part of the Taiwan calculus?
    1
  2033. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  2034. Good one!
    1
  2035.  @maryhadda8420  Yes, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  2036.  @liberalhere3731  ^^ it figures. 1) fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  2037.  @liberalhere3731  ^^ This fusion crap is another flavor of Koolaid these liberal idiots drink, like climate change and ozone depletion.
    1
  2038.  @unchosenid  👍👍👍 Kirk Sorensen, right?
    1
  2039. Europe is degenerate and condescending with its welfarism which is paid for by American defense spending.
    1
  2040. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  2041.  @EddieTheH  You are FOI.
    1
  2042. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2043. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2044. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2045. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2046. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  2047. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2048. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  2049. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2050.  @jamesross160  Sorry, but global warming is the biggest fraud since communism -- see Henrik Svensmark. It's "fun" making a pointless replacement of perfectly good energy assets? I loos like it. When digging a hole and filling it in again, if different people do the digging and the filling, then, yes, I guess it looks productive to the digger and the filler.
    1
  2051. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  2052. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  2053. Has he done one on data fraud from the witch doctors of climate quackery? Like the IPCC?
    1
  2054. F--- Cuba.
    1
  2055. Wear a crash helmet!
    1
  2056. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  2057. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2058. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2059.  @wgowshipping  "shrug"
    1
  2060. Could be a trap?
    1
  2061.  @Soldmysoulforablurayplayer  Or nuke the dam and flood it.
    1
  2062. Is co2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2063.  @dilvishpa5776  H20 is a greenhouse gas. We experience its heat as humidity. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. We experience its heat too. How are C02 and H2O materially different in term of their effect on climate?
    1
  2064.  @dilvishpa5776  Can you elaborate on: ".... it’s (co2's) contribution is already near its maximum, and will not contribute significantly in the future. "
    1
  2065.  @dilvishpa5776  Yes, please do/post.
    1
  2066.  @dilvishpa5776   How much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2067.  @dilvishpa5776  I don't get it. Why is it logarithmic? Why isn't it linear - more co2, more heat trapped?
    1
  2068.  @dilvishpa5776  Are you trying to humiliate me?
    1
  2069.  @dilvishpa5776  What you've succeeded in doing is alienating your audience. Could you try that again, using words instead of the math?
    1
  2070. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  2071.  @dilvishpa5776  The profoundness of your social retardation is detrimental to your own objectives.
    1
  2072.  @dilvishpa5776  I'm math illiterate? I hope you have a high-speed encounter with a drunk driver.
    1
  2073.  @MiklRbrts  Thank you. Feel free to copy and re-paste. We don't have to be bullied by these climate hustlers.
    1
  2074. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2075. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  2076. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2077. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2078. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  2079. "Gaza could be the Singapore of the middle East." (Allen Dershowitz)
    1
  2080.  @testman9541  Is your smugness a national characteristic too?
    1
  2081.  @adrien5834  Why not? I'm American. Being condescended to by those snooty Europeans goes with the territory.
    1
  2082.  @adrien5834  Case in point: Hey Germany! You've got a Russian invasion on your eastern front and you're spending 60 billion euros on that stupid renewable energy? And you expect Americans to pay for it? (Trump would never settle for a deal like that.)
    1
  2083. Go Paul!
    1
  2084. The "standing Repo facility" is a total, absolute disgrace. It says The Market cannot be allowed to operate freely for one week, or it will bring down the whole system IN ONE WEEK - that's how unstable it is. Nice going, guys. The Founders hate you.
    1
  2085. Yes, Copenhagen Atomics looka like everything Thorium Molten Salt is cracked up to be. (Kirk Sorenson -- the patron saint of Thorium.)
    1
  2086. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2087. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2088. Great fly paper for idiots.
    1
  2089. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  2090. The smug self-satisfied conceit of these videos is an insult to people who have to work for a living.
    1
  2091.  @beerye3  It is theory-of-the-leisure-class self-regarding conceit. Me me me me me, and how great and superior I am. Nauseating to most people.
    1
  2092.  @beerye3  How do you think this pointless self-indulgent crap sounds to someone who has to stand by a cash register 10 hours a day just to make rent?
    1
  2093. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  2094.  @oleksiiivasiuk  ? They do massive fracking in the fracking fields... Restoring some gas pressure sounds easy.
    1
  2095. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  2096. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  2097. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2098. Europe is degenerate and condescending with its welfarism which is paid for by American defense spending.
    1
  2099. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2100. Can't handle the over-emphatic narration.
    1
  2101. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  2102. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2103. Get a life.
    1
  2104. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2105. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2106. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  2107. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2108. Interesting.
    1
  2109. Kind of a fluff piece.
    1
  2110. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2111. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2112.  @Alek4275  1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2113. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2114. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  2115. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2116. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  2117. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  2118. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2119. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2120. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2121. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2122. Then YOU pay for it.
    1
  2123. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  2124. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  2125. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  2126. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2127. 1) Free up truck drivers with self-driving trucks. 2) Free up the petroleum industry with thorium power. 3) Free up the glucose farmers with synthetic glucose production.
    1
  2128. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2129. May I ask what you folks do for a living?
    1
  2130. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  2131.  @Uller1967  Look it up.
    1
  2132.  @IA100KPDT  ... and what a wonderful world that would be. Just ask the Uygurs.
    1
  2133.  @AmauryJacquot  I didn't say anything about US help. What do YOU think of CCP "help"?
    1
  2134.  @AmauryJacquot  ESOL?
    1
  2135. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  2136. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2137. What's wrong with golf courses?
    1
  2138.  @mowlessbeemore2107  Negative, more people get more recreation-hours out of golf courses that any other state park use I can think of; after the basic "picknick park" area you'd expect from a state park.
    1
  2139. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  2140. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  2141. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    1
  2142. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2143. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2144. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2145. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2146. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  2147. South Africa made its own gasoline for decades from coal (Sasol). This EV stuff is stupid. I wish Porshe well, but the manufacturing of gasoline has already been mastered and proven by Sasol. Maybe Porsche wants to appease the global-warming tree-huggers with "carbon neutrality". That's stupid too.
    1
  2148. Is there a good link to what Porsche is trying to do? (As opposed to this man-child's Mickey Mouse description of it?)
    1
  2149. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  2150. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  2151. At min 4:20, what does "resistance decreases" mean when talking about the crankshaft?
    1
  2152. Well done.
    1
  2153.  @tmusa2002  Your point? Is that single income or dual income?
    1
  2154. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2155. This is a clickbait title. "Fool me once...."
    1
  2156. No! Ethanol is NOT GASOLINE. ... But this video is clickbait.
    1
  2157. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  2158. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2159. What was wrong with Katrina?
    1
  2160. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2161. Fusion is a great big BOONDOGGLE, right? Just like renewable energy.
    1
  2162. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2163. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  2164. In other words, we can give ourselves a "cancer vaccination" by exposing ourselves to high radiation?
    1
  2165. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2166. ​ @rogerphelps9939  1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2167. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  2168. Yes -- great stuff. I'm following it over in Electric Viking (thick accent). Great stuff -- wrong reasons: CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  2169. Needs better mic for better audio.
    1
  2170. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2171. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  2172. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  2173. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  2174. "Science Communicator” -- LOL! 🤣
    1
  2175. Probably toppled by earthquakes.
    1
  2176. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  2177. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  2178. This s question without an answer.
    1
  2179. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  2180. No, the Russian middle class does not want this war, so Peter should stop putting words in their mouth.
    1
  2181.  @HR_8035_YEA  That's easy for YOU to say. What ignorantly judgemental things do you have to say about, say, Hong Kong? Or North Korea?
    1
  2182.  @HR_8035_YEA  You haven't lifted a finger to arm the Russian middle class, so spare us your conceit.
    1
  2183.  @Bibitybopitybacon  Why are you even watching Peter Ziehan?
    1
  2184. Sorry, but You should get a professional narrator or get the machine to read the dialogue.
    1
  2185.  @KRAMITDFROG  Just trying to cover all the bases. There's been a buildup of "Peter crap" over the years -- this is the tip of the iceberg.
    1
  2186. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2187. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  2188. South Africa made its own gasoline for decades from coal (Sasol). This EV stuff is stupid. I wish Porshe well, but the manufacturing of gasoline has already been mastered and proven by Sasol. Maybe Porsche wants to appease the global-warming tree-huggers with "carbon neutrality". That's stupid too.
    1
  2189. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2190. @LeidulfBjarteEkren  Yes... How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers! How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days, REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert". The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this. (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2191. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2192. What is the cited channel? Tell us a couple times clearly so we can get it.
    1
  2193. Tew moch ahhccahnt.
    1
  2194. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  2195. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2196. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  2197. How do you get that "glowing charcoal brickette" to send its infrared to a quarter-football-field of TVPs?
    1
  2198. How do you get that "glowing charcoal brickette" to send its infrared to a quarter-football-field of TVPs?
    1
  2199. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2200. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2201. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2202. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  2203. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  2204. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  2205. "Yeah, right."
    1
  2206. Channels like this are for space cadets who don't have real jobs and have too much time on their hands.
    1
  2207.  @alanhat5252  No. Those stupid environmentalists are only good at making things MORE expensive. PRODUCERS are good at making things LESS expensive, and sometimes they overcome the stupidity of the environmentalists.
    1
  2208.  @HH-le1vi  ? There is NO EXCUSE for expensive energy of any kind. (other than temporary f-ups like war). California and Germany are world leaders in energy stupidity.
    1
  2209.  @gangleweed  Artificial rain made with huge condensers and electricity... Good luck with that tax-funded space-cadet BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  2210. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2211. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  2212. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2213. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  2214. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2215. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  2216. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2217. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2218. "Yeah, right."
    1
  2219.  @BENOTAFRAID689  Get a real job.
    1
  2220. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  2221. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2222. No violence except Capitol, you fake news purveyor; Mr. Sanctimonious.
    1
  2223. Well done.
    1
  2224. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  2225. America used to be a can-do place. Now it's PBS "conservation and efficiency". Tighten your belts! You groveling peasants!
    1
  2226. There already is a pipeline. It's called a railroad.
    1
  2227. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  2228. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  2229. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2230. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  2231. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  2232. This is what a shill for the murdererous CCP looks like.
    1
  2233. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2234. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2235. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  2236. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  2237. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2238. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  2239. Well done! Thanks.
    1
  2240. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  2241. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2242. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2243. Long LIV golf!
    1
  2244. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    1
  2245. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2246. Bravo!
    1
  2247. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  2248. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2249. Too bad this guy has such an obnoxious "millennial" attitude.
    1
  2250. Germany's renewable energy fiasco... Please.
    1
  2251. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2252. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2253. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2254. Will the VCP be as repressive as the CCP? Answer: "Yes", according to Steven Kotkin. "One-party communism is an all-or-nothing proposition." 5 Questions for Stephen Kotkin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul1gsIdlJFs
    1
  2255. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  2256. Need professional narrator.
    1
  2257. Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    1
  2258.  @paulfri1569  Another one for the renewable-energy dopamine junkies.
    1
  2259.  @paulfri1569  You think a little shade is going to make agricultural difference in a place as dry as the outback?
    1
  2260.  @paulfri1569  Pal, get a real job. You've been in California weather too long.
    1
  2261.  @paulfri1569  I know. Australia's California climate turns people's minds to mush, just like California does... as per the dopamine-addicted space-cadet who started this thread. https://youtu.be/Zh-AcF_4Hao
    1
  2262.  @paulfri1569  Yes, Australians do have their charm.
    1
  2263.  @paulfri1569  Context: New Zealand I just came from another video thread where the Kiwis were bragging about their geothermal. Such feel-good foolishness. 'scuse my french, but has anyone considered how much "decarbonization" is actually taking place? In terms of percentages? And please spare me the "it'll make a difference in the long run" cr*p. This is a fad that people will get tired of. There are plenty of ruins from this fad from the70s.
    1
  2264.  @paulfri1569  Suppose we could switch all electricity generation to nuclear overnight. Would that make any difference in co2? How long would it take to show up? How much effect would it have besides feel-goodery for these dopamine addicts?
    1
  2265. It's a sandbox boondoggle for propeller heads.
    1
  2266. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2267. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2268. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  2269. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  2270. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2271. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud.  YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  2272. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  2273. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2274. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  2275. No - Putin is bringing great harm to Russia. This war can't be credibly closed without his removal. HIS word on withdrawal means nothing. He was calling for internal overthrow like he was joe 6-pack watching a Sunday talk show. Not presidential - yes - but still accurate.
    1
  2276. Phew... watch Blue Collar Logic: Chuck Berry vs Bruce Springsteen, Two Visions of America https://youtube.com/watch?v=LMdfi46TmXM&si=Sfq-BY5mLZ_9rQsZ It's a shame that kids aren't taught that work can be a raising of the human condition, a better life for all, like Elon Musk and Thomas Edison.  That is American "can-doism" which The Left has a vested interest in demoralizing.  People excited about enterprise don't make good voters for the Democratic Party. [The cheating of the middle class out the price-reduction benefits of productivity increases doesn't help, either.]
    1
  2277. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  2278. They should give the good-journalism 5-questions first. Who, what, where, when, etc. Don't make the viewer have listen through lower level details to find that out.
    1
  2279. Maybe find a more earth-like planet.
    1
  2280. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  2281. Stolen election in 2020, ... Trojan horse in 2024
    1
  2282. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2283. Wow... a big "black market" in communism, might say.
    1
  2284. Will you be giving us a cost comparison and a cost/benefit analysis in a year from now?
    1
  2285. But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  2286. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2287. Is this climate-hustle double talk?
    1
  2288. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  2289. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  2290. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2291. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2292. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2293. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  2294. https://youtu.be/sLVlkZiMJsM
    1
  2295. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2296. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  2297. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2298. Another sign this country is going crazy.
    1
  2299. This is a stupid piece with a stupid point of view.
    1
  2300. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2301. Well done! Basic social skills, what an idea!
    1
  2302. C'mon Lou ... you're not in New York anymore. Advise changing expectations. Good luck. God bless. 👍
    1
  2303. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2304. What is "de-population"?
    1
  2305. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2306. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2307. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2308.  knoahbody69  This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2309. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  2310.  @Starfishtroopers  ? Pump MUDDY water into it. "Reverse Fracking".
    1
  2311. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  2312.  @steelstanding8005  In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  2313. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2314. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  2315. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  2316. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2317. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2318. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2319. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    1
  2320. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN
    1
  2321. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  2322. Hong Kong?
    1
  2323. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2324. Too much accent. Could you make a duplicate where a machine reads the text (PDF or MS Word) Thanks.
    1
  2325. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  2326. Who is she questioning first here?
    1
  2327. Awesome.
    1
  2328. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2329. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  2330. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  2331. F--- Cuba.
    1
  2332. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2333. We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food -- it's a baseline.  Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.
    1
  2334. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  2335. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2336. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2337. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2338. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  2339. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2340. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2341. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2342. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  2343. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  2344. "Hey George Floyd" https://youtu.be/OEvMc-K8XHY
    1
  2345. Was that phone call an AI simulation?
    1
  2346. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2347. For all the orange man bad people out there.
    1
  2348. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2349. El Salvador has a Donald Trump for a President. Bravo!
    1
  2350. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  2351. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  2352. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  2353. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2354. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  2355.  @arm-power  Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2356.  @arm-power  Ok. The answer I'm really looking for is "heat capacity" of co2 vs. h2o. i.e., how much more heat does a co2 molecule absorb than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2357.  @arm-power  All these long winded answers (thanks anyway) is not convincing for AGW. (It all looks far fetched.) But I'll try again: how much more heat is trapped at the surface by one co2 compared to one h2o?
    1
  2358.  @arm-power  Thanks, but that's not the question I'm asking, which is: how much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o vapor molecule?
    1
  2359.  @arm-power   How much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2360.  @arm-power  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule "trap" vs. a water vapor molecule? The kind of energy that gets "trapped" that the white-coats on this forum keep talking about.
    1
  2361.  @arm-power  ?
    1
  2362. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  2363. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  2364. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2365.  @MajorRoy  In other words, you are an elitist imposer of human sacrifice.
    1
  2366.  @aaronfranklin324  I watched it. "Just what the doctor ordered (sort of). I wanted and got a discussion of ir-wavelength photons. "Hey tree huggers, earth is not a greenhouse. Spend a night in the desert without a sleeping bag."
    1
  2367. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  2368.  @WMAlbers1  Are you asking a CNN a--kissing question? Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering. * * *
    1
  2369. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2370. The most experienced expats I've watched say Don't do dating apps. Move there and spend 6 months with her IN Person. (I think Reekay says that.)
    1
  2371. It was a suicide bomb, right?
    1
  2372. Well done! Thanks.
    1
  2373. What stupid leading questions from this so-called journalist.
    1
  2374. Interesting. Too bad it didn't work.
    1
  2375. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2376. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM ..
    1
  2377.  @PeterKwanvt80  ^^ A non-critical-thinking Koolaid drinker.
    1
  2378. Germany solved it's energy foolishness in 6 months? Sounds like a lot of cr*p. Look for the trees to be stripped for firewood this winter.
    1
  2379.  @Arltratlo  I'm an American. You think I'm happy about the fix Germany has gotten itself into with their stupid Russian-promoted "green energy"?
    1
  2380.  @surfaceten510n  Puppets? You're talking about Belarus, right?
    1
  2381. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  2382. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2383. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  2384. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  2385. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  2386. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  2387. Min 17:00 California all over again.
    1
  2388. Sweden? Ha! "Sweden is the California of Europe."
    1
  2389.  @glow1815  Because it's socialist. It is the California of if Europe.
    1
  2390.  @patriciamays8244  Thank you, CCP.
    1
  2391. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM ..
    1
  2392. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2393. We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights. "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." The Democratic party specializes in Type 2 laws, that's why their leadership tend to be such bad people and psychopaths.
    1
  2394. Notre Dame 2.0?
    1
  2395. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  2396. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2397. ... It's also somebody's tax funded science project.
    1
  2398. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  2399.  @donaldducko6580  It's Me me me me... neighborhood bragging rights. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  2400. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  2401. No, - Britain didn't join the euro. - The problems are from are from the Fed's raising interest rates, British pensions going bust, BOE about-facing with "don't worry, we'll buy all your bonds." - Britain's return to prosperity after its stupid socialism was North Sea oil and Margaret Thatcher.
    1
  2402. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  2403.  Kenny K  Besides this guy making me sick, it looks like CCP shill propaganda.
    1
  2404.  @iamgreat1234  Singapore built a ship docking berth specifically for US aircraft carriers. Look for CCP to subvert Singapore politics.
    1
  2405.  @junkeatng  Horse-sh**. More ethno-nationist stoking from the CCP.
    1
  2406.  @iamgreat1234  fak?
    1
  2407.  @user-vt5ln7qq4j  Get used to what? That CCP are pigs?
    1
  2408. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  2409. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2410. The Fed should be indicted for murder.
    1
  2411. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  2412. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2413. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2414. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2415. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN
    1
  2416. We all love the 2CV. The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option? Citroen AMI: The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations. But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels. The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari". It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!). How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car??? Burton 2CV Parts: This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts. They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway? This video makes it look like it can: Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut). It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds. Rust is a problem? Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust. Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration. I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms. (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  2417. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2418. Ukraine? Will this disable a supply truck?
    1
  2419. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  2420. Same for India, Haiti, Balkans, Northern Ireland, Belgium, China... Nothing unique about Cypress.
    1
  2421. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2422.  @theredscourge  Servo motors and plasic gears are cheaper than levers and cables? Please.
    1
  2423. @theredscourge  So what? It servo-gears are so cheap, why are cars so damn expensive?
    1
  2424. @theredscourge  If median real income kept up with inflation, it would be $70,000 and not $50,000.
    1
  2425. @theredscourge  How can cars be "cheap" when people can't afford to buy them and they're loaded with complicated crap?
    1
  2426. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2427. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  2428. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  2429. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2430. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  2431. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2432. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  2433. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  2434. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  2435. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  2436.  @nasaihyana  No, China "took off" after the reforms of the late 70s.
    1
  2437. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  2438. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2439. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  2440.  @alpohree  Is this another one of those "the science is settled" assertions in this pile of boondoggle crap?
    1
  2441. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  2442. Sorry but, why is ACA unconstitutional without the mandate? It's been 10 years, I need a refresh.
    1
  2443.  @barryward2128  Thanks - yes, I understand that part of it. It's the non-mandate/non-tax stuff - I don't understand why that's considered unconstitutional, and I don't have the gumption to dig into the details to find out. Sounds like some hideous unfunded mandates on States and such. Thanks for responding.
    1
  2444.  @barryward2128  Thanks for responding. Obviously I'm not an expert, but it looks like after the interpretation of that effing Interstate Commerce clause the Feds can do wtf it wants. Major fixing needed, it looks.
    1
  2445. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    1
  2446. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2447.  @GuillotinedChemistry  Ok, "some what?" How could another 100 parts per million make such a big deal? There's 60 times more water vapor in the air than co2. They do the same thing (nevermind that wavelength stuff). ????
    1
  2448.  @GuillotinedChemistry  So what "if they do the same thing at different wavelengths"???? If a water molecule traps "x" energy, how much energy does a CO2 trap? Since there's 60 times more water vapor than CO2, how much difference can a teensy increase in CO2 make???
    1
  2449.  @GuillotinedChemistry  So what? That's my question. What difference does a "relative amount of increase" if the whole thing is miniscule??? You're dodging my question. Does co2 "hold" 10x as much heat as h2o???? Can somebody answer that??? If co2 "holds" 10x as much heat as h2o, so what? That just means there's an equivalent of 10 more water vapor molecules in the air. What difference does that make when there are already 60 h2o molecules in the air for every 1 co2?
    1
  2450.  @GuillotinedChemistry  Ok. My real question is how much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2451.  @GuillotinedChemistry  I just want a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2452.  @GuillotinedChemistry  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? I've heard 4x (using the word "scatters" (???)). You're giving me a back of the envelope of 5x. The question seems like a pretty crucial piece of the argument. Why is it so hard to get a straight answer???
    1
  2453.  @GuillotinedChemistry  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? ^^ It's a simple question, yet all I get is this double talk in response -- "what part of the infrared spectrum are you talking about" or "go look it up". I've tried to look it up. I get the same double talk. I can't get a straight answer.
    1
  2454. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2455. In other words, Government decides who gets to own a gun. 👎
    1
  2456.  @soniajones5453  Well, he's somebody who keeps his promises and if you Take hom at his it's trouble.
    1
  2457. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  2458. Bravo! "I hope you get as big a reputation as Miranda Devine!"
    1
  2459. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  2460. @ajyoung4530  It says I'm a consumer making a complaint about a product, aka constructive criticism.
    1
  2461.  @carholic-sz3qv  1) It might be a British channel (???) but YouTube has an anglosphere audience, whose biggest segment is American English. 2) I see a lot of American channels that AFFECT a British accent and I'm sick of that too.
    1
  2462. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2463. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  2464. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2465. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  2466. Skill shortage.
    1
  2467. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  2468. Good work, but you might want to get a professional narrator, or have a read aloud program read the script.
    1
  2469. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2470. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's stragegy good or bad?
    1
  2471. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  2472. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2473. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  2474. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  2475. 1) have YouTube show the Negative 👎 ratings 2) have the algorithm consider (a) the viewers negative ratings, (b) the video's negative ratings
    1
  2476. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2477. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  2478. Too emphatic.
    1
  2479. Speaks to a higher ability student, too light-hearted hop-skip "piece of cake" delivery.
    1
  2480. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2481. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  2482.  @charsiubau1  So I can get a good answer, which I still haven't.
    1
  2483. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  2484. Nice place. Have to wonder where that kind of money came from.
    1
  2485. Too much accent.
    1
  2486. Does anyone hate these dipsh*t self-important msm stories?
    1
  2487.  @haruruben  🤮
    1
  2488. "Virginia" is Terry McAuliffe.
    1
  2489. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  2490. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  2491. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2492. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2493. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  2494. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  2495. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    1
  2496.  @daveozip4326  Moon was a boondoggle too. You don't know what "boondoggle" means. But if you think it's such a good idea, YOU WRITE THE CHECK. (and get a real job)
    1
  2497. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  2498.  @daveozip4326  1) get a real job. 2) watch the long DOCTOR Kirk Sorensen video. 3) YOU write the check for this Boondoggle.
    1
  2499.  @Classical741  Spare us the stupid college-sophomore melodrama. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle (new to "renewable energy").
    1
  2500.  @Yerdadada  No. And I'm going to keep posting it 'til my hard-earned tax money stops being pissed away on this stupid propeller-head science project.
    1
  2501. @ Then YOU write the check!
    1
  2502. Awesome! On many levels!
    1
  2503. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  2504.  @chadelles2586  Trump is pro-illegal immigration? The sarcasm of that exposes Peter as a elitist twerp -- probably a lot like you.
    1
  2505. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2506. Great videos, but please try to cut down on the hand gesticulations. Distracting.
    1
  2507. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2508. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  2509. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's stragegy good or bad?
    1
  2510. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  2511. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2512. Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .
    1
  2513. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2514. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2515. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2516. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  2517. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    1
  2518. "We've been warned". Thanks.
    1
  2519. Plastics aren't the problem, slobs are.
    1
  2520. Good material, but needs a professional narrator.
    1
  2521. Too much accent. Could you make a duplicate where a machine reads the text (PDF or MS Word) Thanks.
    1
  2522. Europe has a bad case of Femo-Fascism.
    1
  2523. Well said, JD!
    1
  2524. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  2525. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2526. Too much gesticulation.
    1
  2527. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  2528. More facts and less editorial, thanks.
    1
  2529. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2530. 1) have YouTube show the Negative 👎 ratings 2) have the algorithm consider (a) the viewers negative ratings, (b) the video's negative ratings
    1
  2531.  @hananokuni2580  Tell that to Scott Kilmer.
    1
  2532.  @July41776DedicatedtoTheProposi  So what?
    1
  2533. @@formosan2823 ... And how does that make Peter Zeihan feel?
    1
  2534. @@formosan2823 I think he does pay attention to criticisms about being an out-of-touch never-had-a-real-job academic elitist.
    1
  2535. Sorry, needs a professional narrator.
    1
  2536. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2537. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2538. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  2539. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2540. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2541. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2542. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2543. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2544. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  2545. Yes, it's well done. That said, I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a laid of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  2546. For all the orange man bad people out there.
    1
  2547. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  2548. Too much accent and needs a lapel mic.
    1
  2549.  @peterjohnston2196  ?
    1
  2550. Yes, he passes the psychopath test. He should be PET scanned. 10 Traits of a Psychopath https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JVVhKP9XP4&t=105s
    1
  2551. Go Vivek!
    1
  2552. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2553.  @isaackarr6576  While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2554. Well said, JD!
    1
  2555. 1) Free up truck drivers with self-driving trucks. 2) Free up the petroleum industry with thorium power. 3) Free up the glucose farmers with synthetic glucose production.
    1
  2556. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2557. Any thoughts about thorium/MSRs?
    1
  2558. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2559. Can't take the over-dramatic narrator voice.
    1
  2560. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2561. Could use a professional narrator.
    1
  2562. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  2563. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2564. Is this romper room business or am I missing something? Is this renewable-energy stuff a giant kid's lemonade stand business, or am I missing something? *********** A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 ..
    1
  2565. Build the wall.
    1
  2566. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  2567. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  2568. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  2569. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  2570. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2571. I love Whoppers!
    1
  2572. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2573. Freedom = a 50 cal + 2nd Amendment :)
    1
  2574. Who is she questioning first here?
    1
  2575. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2576. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  2577.  Morgan Allen  I think you're full of sh*t, but if that's how you feel about fusion, YOU write the check. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly spend???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. If that's the way you feel about it, YOU write the check. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  2578.  Morgan Allen  Duly noted. Edited, but not much. You can usually tell the self-serving white-coats who are already on the gravy train. There's another gaslighted group of people who have drunk the koolaid of "It's science, so it must be good." At the end of the day, it's still billions of my/taxper's money pissed away on a worthless boondoggle.
    1
  2579.  Morgan Allen  1) you're being "had" by the fusion quacks. 2) leave my money out of it. * 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation -- 10,000,000 degrees operating temperature. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. (600 degrees operating temperature.) Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly spend???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. It that's how these propeller-head science geeks feel about it, THEY CAN WRITE THE CHECK. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  2580.  Morgan Allen  No, throwing money at fusion for power generation is indeed a fraud. And I repeat the bullet points because you're not listening to them.
    1
  2581.  Morgan Allen  You too. If you have a few spare hours, here is my thorium playlist, with links to the Kirk Sorenson videos. You'll "scream" when you learn the full extent of our nuclear power stupidity. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2582. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  2583. This would be easier to understand if there was less accent, e.g., architecture vs. ahh-ka-tec-cha.
    1
  2584. This video is such a load of it.
    1
  2585. Boooo...
    1
  2586. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  2587. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  2588. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  2589. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2590. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  2591. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  2592. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  2593.  @thomasmount7388  In other words, the dollar-pegged HK$ is worth more than the CCP-controlled yuan?
    1
  2594.  @henrylee3483  An exchange rate thing?
    1
  2595. Bravo!
    1
  2596. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2597. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2598. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2599. How about this: Alan Dershowitz said, "Gaza could be the next Singapore." How to do that? 1) IDR occupies Gaza and provides 100% protection of property and contract enforcement, like the British administered Hong Kong. Do that indefinitely 'til they become so prosperous they don't want to change the status quo. 2) Gaza is a 100% free trade zone. 3) Pay the land-expropriated refugees back and continuing rent; landless refugees some form of reparation.
    1
  2600. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  2601. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2602. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  2603. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2604. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2605. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2606.  @shamusshanahan1849  While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2607. Beavers will be to the Southwest what 50s cars are to sch*t-hole Cuba -- a way to get around laws prohibiting HUMANS from building dams.
    1
  2608. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  2609. F--- Cuba.
    1
  2610. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  2611. How about this: Build The Wall.
    1
  2612.  @morro190  Then why the condescension for Donald Trump?
    1
  2613. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  2614. Stupid California and the Femo-Fascists.
    1
  2615. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2616. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2617. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2618. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2619. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  2620.  @MattBuild4  Yes -- I wonder if you can make an MSR with natural uranium (like a CANDU reactor, only with molten salt).
    1
  2621.  @MattBuild4  That's good news. Mastering MSR with natural uranium and "everybody" can be in the nuclear power business.
    1
  2622.  @MattBuild4  Sounds good. "Start with the easiest." Meanwhile -- Kirk Sorensen and Flibe, "more power to you."
    1
  2623. Please get a less dramatic narrator.
    1
  2624.  @blu0065  Is that "Mr. Huntington Beach"?
    1
  2625. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2626. No, - Britain didn't join the euro. - The problems are from are from the Fed's raising interest rates, British pensions going bust, BOE about-facing with "don't worry, we'll buy all your bonds." - Britain's return to prosperity after its stupid socialism was North Sea oil and Margaret Thatcher.
    1
  2627. How big is your trust fund?
    1
  2628.  @jeuwniper  "One thing" ? How about The Wall? How about tax cuts? How about North Korea? How about trade deals? How about getting those free-loading, condescending Europeans to pay up of NATO? How about... How about you and PZ taking your Trump condescension and sticking it you know where.
    1
  2629.  @davidlinehat4657  I.e., I'm one of those dumb MAGA Republicans. ... At least YOU are American. Those snooty pissant condescending Europeans don't talk like that.
    1
  2630. Superstition.
    1
  2631. Am I hearing another "me me me me" video? (Or is it just 'me'?) [Who is this guy?]
    1
  2632. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  2633.  @rolfmandrup5982  A "tax break" for you and your feel-goodery is a tax increase for somebody else, for starters (not to mention the screwing up ($up) of utility rates for everybody else.
    1
  2634.  @rolfmandrup5982  I DGAS about Danish taxes. Decarbonization is stupid 21st century pyramid building.
    1
  2635.  @Traitorman.25th  There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming (see Henrik Svensmark). Anthropogenic global warming is a boondoggle-justifying load of rot.
    1
  2636. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  2637. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    1
  2638. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2639. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  2640. In other words, the LIMITING FACTOR is the price of nickel????
    1
  2641.  @xxportalxx.  How does any of this square with Germany's stupid "green energy" boondoggles? (Making them dependent on Russian gas? BTW, did Russia subsidize that stupid Green Party? (for obvious reasons?)).
    1
  2642. WGAS?
    1
  2643.  @NicoA223  Do the world a favor and get a real job.
    1
  2644. Instead of obsessing about efficiency, why not make fuel DIRT CHEAP, which we can do with Thorium molten salt reactors.
    1
  2645. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2646. In other words, we can give ourselves a "cancer vaccination" by exposing ourselves to high radiation?
    1
  2647. Very funny. Maybe a distinction should be made between SOCIAL phone calls and ... what.... UTILITARIAN phone calls. (How about "informational" phone calls?) Yes. Informational phone calls can be done with texts. SOCIAL phone calls are about maintaining and enhancing relationships. Good relationships are always nice -- live phone is a step up from text, face to face is a step up from phone.
    1
  2648. I call it Femo-Fascism.
    1
  2649.  @daz3434  It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  2650.  @daz3434  It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  2651. @Rajesh-Koothrappali  Please get a real job.
    1
  2652. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  2653.  @ProfessorDaveExplains  And you've got the slob's narcissistic self-entitled attitude too.
    1
  2654. Good work. Thanks.
    1
  2655. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  2656. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  2657. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  2658. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  2659. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  2660. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2661. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  2662. 👍👍👍👍👍
    1
  2663. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2664. Thank you for making! Are RFIDs the same as "chips" in your credit card?
    1
  2665. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2666. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2667. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    1
  2668. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  2669. Can't take the effeminate voice.
    1
  2670. Phew... watch Blue Collar Logic: Chuck Berry vs Bruce Springsteen, Two Visions of America https://youtube.com/watch?v=LMdfi46TmXM&si=Sfq-BY5mLZ_9rQsZ It's a shame that kids aren't taught that work can be a raising of the human condition, a better life for all, like Elon Musk and Thomas Edison.  That is American "can-doism" which The Left has a vested interest in demoralizing.  People excited about enterprise don't make good voters for the Democratic Party. [The cheating of the middle class out the price-reduction benefits of productivity increases doesn't help, either.]
    1
  2671.  @kobrapromotions  Cool. You must be well paid to get that far in aviation. May I ask what it is you mine and the general location?
    1
  2672. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2673. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2674. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2675. Sorry, but I think climate change is crap. For one, there were several BIG "climate changes" in the mere blink-of-an-eye window of recorded human history. One of them was the Medieval Warm Periods. Was that caused by SUVs? What's wrong with this picture? Here we have a PhD physicist who has to go back to the books for hour to investigate the science of what these snake-oil climate hustlers are saying (which I'm sure THEY haven't done). What she found was a shaggy dog story that has to go 3 levels deep, and THEN still ends with, "there still a lot of complications in this theory..." And at the end of it, I don't understand this "balance" stuff. Do any of YOU? It the space of two sentences we get "the earth has to get hotter because the stratosphere (beginning at 33,000 feet) got 1-2 degrees colder..." The politics of that are "Now! You peasants! Submit to a 25% reduction in your standard of living and pay up it taxes for trillions of dollars in stupid "green energy" BOONDOGGLES! (Ms. Sabin is German. Germany doesn't have such a good track record in the totality of "green energy" stuff -- either with its performance (see Peter Zeihan), or its making itself dependent on Russian natural gas.) How many of YOU understand this "balance" stuff? Climate change is 21st century superstition -- any bad weather event is YOUR FAULT because YOU drove that evil ICE. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  2676. How much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2677. How much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2678.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  That's not what I asked.
    1
  2679.  @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885  That's not what I asked.
    1
  2680. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  2681. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  2682. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2683. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2684. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2685. Well done. Thanks!
    1
  2686. Needs lapel mic for better/easier audio.
    1
  2687. Generation-Idiot's Ballad Of Climate Quackery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g
    1
  2688. $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  2689. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  2690. Great work.
    1
  2691. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"?
    1
  2692. Min 2:50 Confusing captioning.
    1
  2693. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  2694. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  2695.  @hamisharchibald5270  It's not Ford's fault. It's that stupid EPA and DOE.
    1
  2696. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2697. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN
    1
  2698.  @thelonewolf666  From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  2699. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  2700. Well said.
    1
  2701. This video is such a load of it.
    1
  2702. It's hard to listen to his voice. Any chance he could make a copy of this where MS Word or PDF reads the text?
    1
  2703.  @charlesmd  The lights? Turn them off? Ah! The retrogressive pyramid-building of that stupid "renewable energy" will do that for me. (AHW is a load of it. Just burn coal.)
    1
  2704.  @charlesmd  Woke-Trudeau Canada sucks. Alberta is welcome anytime.
    1
  2705. The only non-Alberta thing I like about Canada is the CANDU reactor.
    1
  2706.  @charlesmd  Liberal Canada's crappy healthcare system outsources to the US. ... Effing freeloaders. Canada sucks.
    1
  2707.  @charlesmd  Canadian Liberals eat sch*t.
    1
  2708.  @charlesmd  *you're
    1
  2709.  @charlesmd  Canadian Liberals eat sch*t.
    1
  2710.  @user-uu2rf8ev7z  I haven't even watched the full video and I think it should be named "How Low Canada Has Sunk". I keep a playlist (public) called Stupid Canada.
    1
  2711. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  2712. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  2713. "Tehran" had to be a miss-speak.
    1
  2714. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  2715. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2716. https://youtu.be/sLVlkZiMJsM
    1
  2717.  @telster51  You're asking a question like that in a war?
    1
  2718. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2719. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2720. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2721. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2722. Thank you for not making this a (total) cheerleading session for another tax-funded science project.
    1
  2723. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  2724. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2725. No, inflation does not make a country better off!
    1
  2726. The next step is a shakedown infrastructure: "Pay us or we'll ransack your business."
    1
  2727. Well done.
    1
  2728. It was a bicycle accident, right? (That hallmark of Dutch quackery and virtue signaling.) Bikes suck!!!!
    1
  2729. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2730. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    1
  2731. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    1
  2732. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2733. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2734.  @CavemanVanDweller  You live a hippie's existence in that van? And you have time to idly theorize (ignorantly) about "cost"? I've heard that hippie/quasi-communist/lefty line enough times to know the ignorance behind it. You have no right to talk about the "cost" of something unless you OWN it. You don't OWN the forest, but the hippie/Femo-Fascist types like you think and act like you do. And given your hippie van-life, you probably think you you own a seasonal campsite too.
    1
  2735.  @CavemanVanDweller  You sound like someone from Seattle. You don't OWN the forest, so your "cost" concern has that West Coast quasi-communist sound to it. West Coast is so full of it.
    1
  2736. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    1
  2737. Poor acoustics. Why do these MSM reports sound like fluff pieces and insults to the intelligence?
    1
  2738. Bye Britain.
    1
  2739. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  2740. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  2741. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  2742. nother "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  2743. Gee.... a huge, gigantic explosion of a CONTAINER bound for the mid-east from China? Gosh! I wonder what that could be?
    1
  2744.  @Relkond  How about MUNITIONS being sent to Iran?
    1
  2745.  @MatthijsvanDuin  Phew. Do you have a source link?
    1
  2746. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  2747. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2748. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his his speaking gigs.
    1
  2749. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2750. Andrew Cuomo (echchc)
    1
  2751. @Formosan 1) time for a Pacific NATO 2) Hopefully yes. 3) What happens after invasion fails? 4) What if invasion succeeds? 5) Long weekend for Taiwan to nuclearize. Why not do it now?
    1
  2752. Sell continuation of US Navy protection of global sea traffic as anti-inflationary. US Navy budget: $350 billion - cheap.
    1
  2753.  @carlpoppa1788  Just ask Mark Stein.
    1
  2754. Is this the "50 caliber".
    1
  2755. 👍👍👍
    1
  2756. How many tons of iron do you need to store a megawatt-hour?
    1
  2757. Don't underestimate the Chinese.
    1
  2758.  @junkscience6397  You have a stupidity poor understanding of Chinese history -- what you're referring to is communist imposed idiocy under mass murderer Mao.
    1
  2759. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  2760.  @ax14pz107  I take it you don't have a real job.
    1
  2761.  @ax14pz107  I take you haven't had a real job for more than five minutes.
    1
  2762. Poor acoustics. Why do these MSM reports sound like fluff pieces and insults to the intelligence?
    1
  2763. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  2764. It was a bicycle accident, right? (That hallmark of Dutch quackery and virtue signaling.) Bikes suck!!!!
    1
  2765. Several comments suggest 3D printing.
    1
  2766. This is stupid. See the Kirk Sorenson videos on Thorium Molten Salt Reactors.
    1
  2767. Is this guy a schmuck, or is it just me?
    1
  2768. Is this guy a schmuck, or is it just me?
    1
  2769. It was a bicycle accident, right? (That hallmark of Dutch quackery and virtue signaling.) Bikes suck!!!!
    1
  2770. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  2771. Goodbye, Europe.
    1
  2772. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  2773. Sorry, don't buy or like the knee jerk invocation if "climate change". Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  2774. The sexual attraction has passed. Now what? What is an "I just want some company" relationship? Let's call that a companionship relationship. What's the core transaction there?
    1
  2775. Too much accent.
    1
  2776. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  2777. Sorry, I'm not getting this concept of of "collateral shortage". Not making sense to me. I'm seeing reverse repo as just a somewhat-desperate attempt to reduce money supply to quell inflation without raising interest rates. Where does collateral shortage come into it?
    1
  2778. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  2779. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  2780. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  2781. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2782. Could you start with a summary about the what the proximity fuse is?
    1
  2783. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  2784. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2785. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  2786. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  2787. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  2788. RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  2789.  @alexcaloca6566  RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  2790. This is what a shill for the murdererous CCP looks like.
    1
  2791. Kayleigh rocks!
    1
  2792. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2793. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2794. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  2795. No. There is a MOUNTAIN of circumstantial evidence that the 2020 election was stolen. [Peter Ziehan is a Machiavellian elitist.]
    1
  2796. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism!
    1
  2797. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  2798. Plastics aren't the problem, slobs are.
    1
  2799. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2800. "The Jack Ruby snipers"
    1
  2801.  @cnnothingburgerletsgobrand6381  Jack Ruby revisited.
    1
  2802. Fantastic!
    1
  2803. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  2804. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  2805. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  2806. Round numbers: 1) Ok, electricity is 4x more expensive to heat with the fossil fuel. 2) the electric heat pump produces 4x as much heat as consumed to extract it from the water. 3) so a big heat pump breaks even with fossil fuel, BEFORE spending several thousand dollars for the heat pump equipment and installation. "Next..."
    1
  2807. We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food -- it's a baseline.  Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.
    1
  2808. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  2809. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2810. This is what a shill for the murdererous CCP looks like.
    1
  2811. F--- Cuba.
    1
  2812. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  2813. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  2814. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  2815. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2816. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2817. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2818. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2819. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  2820.  @patrickforbes6745  Channels like this are for space cadets who don't have real jobs and have too much time on their hands.
    1
  2821.  @mrp782  Space-cadeting is fun when you have other people's money to spend.
    1
  2822.  @everlastinglife5978  "Want to buy a bridge?"
    1
  2823. And this is why 1) there are no ACCOUNTANTS on this thread. 2) No one follows up with any cost-effective analysis. 3) why accountants are laughed at and considered 2nd class citizens in these circles. This is all about feel-good fantasy. "Fairy tales for adults". The Daily Dopamine... But the REALITY of cost-benefit? Booo!!! "Stop spoiling our feel-good fantasy fun!"
    1
  2824. @joesutherland225  Spare me the victimology.
    1
  2825. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2826. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  2827. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2828. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  2829. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  2830. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  2831. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2832. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2833. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  2834. To Newmax!
    1
  2835. Would be easier to listen to if there were less accent.
    1
  2836. RN is an idiot, like most Democrats.
    1
  2837. How can Ukraine defend itself against the 3000-pound glide bombs?
    1
  2838. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2839. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2840. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2841.  @HealingLifeKwikly  You're a Koolaid-inebriated fool.
    1
  2842.  @HealingLifeKwikly  Horse sh*t.
    1
  2843.  @HealingLifeKwikly  Actually, you sound more like a lawyer than a scientist.
    1
  2844.  @HealingLifeKwikly  ^^ Complete crap. ... And SUVs caused the medieval warm period too.
    1
  2845. There have been 3 warm periods in RECORDED HISTORY. Recorded history (5000 years) is is to climate what grains of sand are to the beach. ^^ Your quackery and charlatanism is plain for all to see when you call that "the distant past". You are a snake oil salesman.
    1
  2846.  @HealingLifeKwikly  2) There is no warming, you schmuck. And in the 70s idiots like you were peddling "ice age". One tenured academic a-hole wrote an ice-age book in the 70s and a burning-up book in the 90s.
    1
  2847.  @HealingLifeKwikly  3) CO2 is a TRACE GAS. Trace gases do not control the climate.
    1
  2848.  @HealingLifeKwikly  BTW... did you use any sequestered CO2 in your house? (aka lumber?)
    1
  2849.  @HealingLifeKwikly  What university pays you for such quack mediocrity?
    1
  2850.  @HealingLifeKwikly  You get paid with tax dollars to come up with snake oil sleaze like "globally synchronous"?
    1
  2851.  @HealingLifeKwikly  "People of European descent..." I.e. truth about climate is"racist". You are a self-serving fraud.
    1
  2852.  @HealingLifeKwikly  No, your "globally synchronous" is a glib response to one-of-many flat contradictions to your global warming crap. "Oh! It was LOCAL, it didn't happen "all over the world" so it didn't count." BTW, the warming occurred in Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland too. Is that your idea of local? Have you got a glib little alibi for that one too???? (You're like those quack astrologers when they get caught in their fraud. They have glib excuses handy when their stories get exposed as crap.)
    1
  2853.  @HealingLifeKwikly  ^^ More burdon-of-proof-is-on-YOU glib responses from the climate-quack astrologer. "Last time the earth warmed, it was (a) local (i.e. doesn't count), (b) caused by something else. THIS TIME the cause is YOU!" <--- this is a quack witch doctor setting him and his tax-sucking class up for human sacrifices.
    1
  2854.  @HealingLifeKwikly  Horse sh*t.
    1
  2855.  @HealingLifeKwikly  CBS News? LOL 🤣😆
    1
  2856.  @HealingLifeKwikly  "... a mountain of scientific evidence proves..." No it doesn't. In fact The Evidence is so anti-narrative that the Chief witch doctors had to FALSIFY "the data" to fit the narrative. This happens repeatedly. The credibility of your field is crap.
    1
  2857.  @HealingLifeKwikly  But none of those were the ones quoted by idiots like Al Gore and Michael Mann, right?
    1
  2858.  @HealingLifeKwikly  CBS? Right - the Dan Rather school of theater and fake news.
    1
  2859.  @HealingLifeKwikly  BTW, how well did CBS report on the numerous cases of data falsification by the ax-grinders of climate crap?
    1
  2860.  @HealingLifeKwikly  It's always deeper into the double talk and snake oil... The high priests of climate quackery were caught LIEING about the the data.
    1
  2861.  @HealingLifeKwikly  *lying They were investigated by their co-conspirators on the billion-dollar climate quack gravy train.
    1
  2862.  @HealingLifeKwikly  Your skill isn't science, it's mastering a handful of glib responses to getting caught and exposed in the crap universe of "global warming", while siphoning off some slush from this multimillion boondoggle. Nazis and Communists believed their own lies too.
    1
  2863. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2864. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2865. Great work John Stossel!
    1
  2866. Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    1
  2867. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  2868. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2869. Need lapel mic.
    1
  2870. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  2871.  @TheeRocker  ? So what? Does that mean the deck should be stacked in favor of solar geeks at the expenses of grid consumers?
    1
  2872.  @TheeRocker  Maybe so. I can't stand "2-bit da Vinci" and his trust fund existence, or anything from that stupid "renewable energy" crowd.
    1
  2873. ​ @wgowshipping  Sal, Min 9:07 "No" -- it SHOULD be called a "Dark Fleet" because they "spoof" their their GPS locations and outright turn off their transponders. I.e., they are HIDING from the sanctions regime. China Uncensored channel has a story on this. It's causing big problems and risks throughout the shipping world.
    1
  2874. Where is this located?
    1
  2875.  @madrigale6396  Thank you. This video blew it on basic journalism, not answering the Five Questions in the first paragraph.
    1
  2876. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  2877. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  2878. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    1
  2879. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  2880. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  2881. A country is the property right of its citizens - hence immigration policy.
    1
  2882. WGAS?
    1
  2883.  @charleswomack2166  How courteous. For all it's slaughter inflicted on Ukraine, they made a big mistake with that. This is a chance to finish off russia as an aggressive nation and bring it into NATO to calm it down.
    1
  2884. Poor acoustics. Why do these MSM reports sound like fluff pieces and insults to the intelligence?
    1
  2885. Well done. Best explanation of fission and it's history I've ever heard.
    1
  2886. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  2887. Samurais virtuous? Please. "War Lord" is more like it.
    1
  2888. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  2889. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  2890. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2891. LOL. How the other half lives. "Hey Peter -- Mr. Deep State apologist! I'm not giving ANYTHING to your charities 'til you fly Southwest on standby all the time!"
    1
  2892. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2893. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  2894. LOL
    1
  2895. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers! How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days, REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert". The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this. (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2896. How do you get that "glowing charcoal brickette" to send its infrared to a quarter-football-field of TVPs?
    1
  2897. Who is she questioning first here?
    1
  2898. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism! Asian NATO now!
    1
  2899. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism! Asian NATO now!
    1
  2900. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  2901. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  2902. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  2903. Unacceptable? That's tribalism. - my tribe against your tribe. At the tribal level there's no right or wrong, only power. This is how "nations" form in the first place - "ethnic cleansing". "Nations" are glorified tribes and their territories. Between nations there is no "right or wrong", only power. There's no diversity in the Chinatowns - in the west, the only people condemned and punished for tribalism are whites. What would happen if a neighborhood called itself Caucasiantown? The practice of ethnic cleansing isn't done in the West anymore (more or less), Best of luck to you both and families. I hope you're happier in America.
    1
  2904. Good work!
    1
  2905. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  2906. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  2907. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2908. Awesome!
    1
  2909. Legalized dope pushing - great going.
    1
  2910. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2911. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  2912. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  2913. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  2914. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  2915. Does anyone hate these dipsh*t self-important msm stories?
    1
  2916. Can't China just thermo-baric bomb all of Taiwan till it's bombed into submission, like Mariupol?
    1
  2917. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  2918. Coal?
    1
  2919. Government without a Constitution is good? Please!
    1
  2920. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  2921. Europe has a bad case of Femo-Fascism.
    1
  2922. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2923. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2924. PS: it starts to diverge after Nixon welched on the gold standard in August 1971.
    1
  2925. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2926. Can't take the voice. Sounds like pre-flight instructions on an airplane.
    1
  2927. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  2928. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  2929.  @Pro1er  "Making the desert bloom" makes us all richer as long as the cost of the water is less than the benefit gained. Great Lakes has excess fresh water that just pours out to the sea over Niagara Falls. Please -- spare us the "water scarcity" wolf-crying about water levels in the Great Lakes.
    1
  2930. Interesting content... ... but too much accent and drama in the voice. It would be easier to listen to if the text were read by MS Word.
    1
  2931. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  2932. "Hey America, how's the Femo-Fascism working out?"
    1
  2933. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  2934. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  2935. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  2936. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  2937. Chinese will take this over in the blink of an eye ("militarize").
    1
  2938. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  2939. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2940. You Democrats are disgusting. You can't win on argument, so you use force. Typical. Stalin would be proud. It wasn't a "rule", anyway.
    1
  2941. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  2942.  @timsievers2067  Blamestop is leading the entire banking system around by the nose? Thanks, but I still don't get it. I understand why there's a bank reg for cash. But I don't understand why there's a bank reg for "collateral", i e. non-cash? Is that the Fed's way of saying "you better not hoard cash! You better spend some of that money on T-bills"?
    1
  2943. Interesting content... ... but too much accent and drama in the voice. It would be easier to listen to if the text were read by MS Word.
    1
  2944. No. We have the rule if law in this country. The law applies to the Clintons as well as everything else.
    1
  2945. @The00Dude  Get a real job.
    1
  2946. Hard to make sense of this. Is there a point?
    1
  2947. About the voice/narrative/audio: I'm starting to hear that (millennial) sing-songy drop-off at the end of sentences. This is difficult to listen to. Please just try to keep a *professional" narrator's voice. Great material. Thanks.
    1
  2948. @michaeldonovan7522  I don't care.
    1
  2949. He sounds like a CCP shill.
    1
  2950.  @chiakeesame972  Isn't this guy a CCP shill?
    1
  2951.  @tony001212  This guy sounds like a CCP shill.
    1
  2952. 👍👍👍
    1
  2953. Yes, "that stupid Stewart Varney".
    1
  2954. Thomas Sowell and "Black Rednecks"?
    1
  2955. Why can't he say "ISIS"?
    1
  2956. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2957. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  2958. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  2959. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  2960. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  2961. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  2962. Don't you just hate the assuming, arrogant, "I've got the scoop" tone of voice? Civilization: rule of law. Democratic Party: rule of convenience. Watch "Tucker: Bloomberg shouldn't be on the debate stage" on YouTube https://youtu.be/cjo16hzVGt0
    1
  2963. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  2964. Disgusting.
    1
  2965. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  2966. Such a load of it.
    1
  2967. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  2968. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2969. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  2970. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  2971. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    1
  2972. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  2973.  @jacksons1010  Spare me your conceit.
    1
  2974.  @jacksons1010  Spare me your conceit. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  2975.  @jacksons1010  Who's the luddite now? We're expected to follow 3 levels deep from a PhD who didn't get global warming in the first few decades of climate alarmism, and STILL ends up with "... and there's more to it"... And then this climate poseur expects the rest of us to go back to pulling rickshaws based on his "science" (not economic) conceit.
    1
  2976. We're supposed to go back to pulling rickshaws because of this long-winded crap?
    1
  2977. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  2978.  @jacksons1010  You quibble about semantics after endorsing forced back-to-rickshaw-pulling world poverty. (I hope you do jail time in Sri Lanka.)
    1
  2979.  @jacksons1010  You didn't read my post. Read it first, then come talk to me about that Sierra Club crap.
    1
  2980.  @jacksons1010  But I have to give credit where credit is due: One thing you and your type are good at ... is making things more expensive.
    1
  2981. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  2982. Is this climate-hustle double talk?
    1
  2983.  @gmprice  You don't know that the Medieval Warm Period, or the Roman Warm Period, or the 5000-years-ago (Ice Man of the Alps) warm periods were "regional". That is an acertion the global-warmists make to defend their man-caused warming arguments, when in fact warming has happened repeatedly in the past, the last one leaving its mark in recorded history. AGW is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2984.  @gmprice  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  2985.  @gmprice  Your smart-alec response lost you whatever credibility anyone thought you had. Too bad rain can't was out the global-warming superstition koolaid you have imbibed. * * * There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8 *
    1
  2986.  @lrvogt1257  This sounds like BS Spend a night in the desert without a sleeping bag and then talk to me about co2 being a ”greenhouse gas".
    1
  2987. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  2988. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  2989. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  2990. In other words, co2 is glorified humidity. Sorry, but "anthro" climate change is not credible. It is 21st century superstition. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  2991. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2992.  @BCFalls1  Is co2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2993.  @ricksmall5240  Is co2 glorified humidity?
    1
  2994.  @ricksmall5240  What if CO2 is a EFFECT of warming and not a CAUSE?
    1
  2995. My real question is how much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  2996. @Guillotined Chemistry  I just want a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2997. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2998. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  2999.  @BCFalls1  Still seeking a straight answer to the question.
    1
  3000.  @bobboonah  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? * Yes, that sounds like the double-talk I get every time I try to get a straight answer to this question.
    1
  3001.  @bobboonah  aka snake oil salesmen.
    1
  3002. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  3003. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3004.  @silentlurcker  Could you expand on that 2nd paragraph a little more?
    1
  3005.  @BCFalls1  ? Please provide the context for these responses. (Don't know what you're talking about when seen in a vacuum.)
    1
  3006.  @silentlurcker  ? Please provide the context for these responses. I don't know what you're talking about when posted "in a vacuum".
    1
  3007.  @silentlurcker  Whatever. Please provide the context of what you're responding to.
    1
  3008. Would radium-dial watches be a useful analogy in this discussion?
    1
  3009. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    1
  3010. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3011. We're supposed to go back to pulling rickshaws for this long-winded crap?
    1
  3012. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  3013. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  3014. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3015. Is this climate-hustle double talk?
    1
  3016.  @arturoeugster7228  No - what? Context, please.
    1
  3017. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3018. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3019. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3020. Is coal cheaper than nuclear?
    1
  3021. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  3022. Quack science. Ozone depletion LOOKS LIKE A FRAUD -- just like the quackery that is global warming(1). https://youtu.be/9Szs-treHwQ The alleged culprit is chlorine. Has CLOROX been "banned"? Does the NaCl of SEAWATER add to atmospheric chlorine? BTW - that "hole" in ozone over the south pole: was it there before we had satellites to photograph it? How long? Maybe it was always there. Maybe it was always a feature of the atmosphere. Instead we're going to get a royal screwing over everything the involves refrigeration. (1) see videos like this for the quack science that is "global warming": https://youtu.be/JpfMM3bVbhQ
    1
  3023.  @ryko4899  ?
    1
  3024. This is a bad place to get American news. Just watch Fox, Glenn Beck. Shapiro, Mark Dice, Styxhexenhammer, Dinesh D'Souza, Next News Network, Bill Whittle, Matt Walsh....
    1
  3025. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  3026. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3027. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  3028. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3029. Thank you. But graphic are on the "cut and paste" side; often confusing.
    1
  3030. He sounds like a CCP shill.
    1
  3031. nother "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  3032. What are "prismatic batteries"?
    1
  3033. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  3034. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  3035. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3036. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3037. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  3038.  @Tom-dt4ic  Sure... YOU write the check for this stupid multi-billion dollar science club project. And you don't understand the thorium-fission alternative. You're going to feel pretty foolish once you've spent a few hours studying that.
    1
  3039. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  3040. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3041. No. People still want BETTER lives <--- that will be the source of growth.
    1
  3042. Go MTG!
    1
  3043. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3044. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3045. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    1
  3046. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  3047. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3048.  steveinoz8188  CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3049. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  3050. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  3051. https://youtu.be/sLVlkZiMJsM
    1
  3052. Mike Rowe would be proud.
    1
  3053. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3054. Min 7: No, conservatism has been defeated by Femo-Fascism serially for 100 years.
    1
  3055. Min 39:00 Quantum computing in the brain.
    1
  3056. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  3057.  @KarlDMarx  As you wish, ... just get back into production.
    1
  3058. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    1
  3059. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  3060. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3061. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3062. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  3063. What bragging rights! Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    1
  3064.  @aloneinanearthship4010  You're part of the idiocracy of climate change. That makes you fair game.
    1
  3065.  @aloneinanearthship4010  1) Climate change is crap. 2) Stupid climate quackery + energy = energy communism. You belong with the likes of Stalin and Mao.
    1
  3066.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Climate change is crap, and so is your self-centered pagan/animis religion.
    1
  3067.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Because you can't. Your whole schtick is based on that climate crap, which you only want to echo-chamber and mirror-gaze about, not debate. Get a real job.
    1
  3068.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Nor do I intend to watch your bragging-rights probably trust-funded channel.
    1
  3069.  @aloneinanearthship4010  🖕
    1
  3070.  @aloneinanearthship4010  You get what give, Mr. Koolaid-inebriated climate quack.
    1
  3071.  @aloneinanearthship4010  ^^ this guy's handle is "Alone in an Earthship"... and he's calling ME the flake.
    1
  3072.  @aloneinanearthship4010  . It's ok to be a flake. The problems arise when the flakes, quacks, and superstitionists get political.
    1
  3073.  @aloneinanearthship4010  What's all this solar power crap if you haven't bought into the politics of "global warming" crap?
    1
  3074.  @aloneinanearthship4010  You're playing to the climate-change idiots of Silicon Valley, which makes YOU part of the problem. Meanwhile, the energy and transportation industries are being communized by these a-holes and YOU are dinking around with windmills.
    1
  3075.  @aloneinanearthship4010  You're not "just curious", you want to sound the bugle to the probable-majority of climate-change idiots on this comment thread.
    1
  3076.  @aloneinanearthship4010  How big is your trust fund?
    1
  3077.  @aloneinanearthship4010  So many of the yahoos in the climate-change cult are spoiled rich kids, like those antifa idiots.
    1
  3078.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Very funny. I'm disappointed that you can't/won't objectively refute the objective criticisms of climate crap and superstition I've posted. It's a despicable characteristic of the left - make bombastic idiocy, then walk out. It matters because their idiocy becomes law.
    1
  3079.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Yes, you'd rather live in your hall of mirrors echo chamber, getting validation from other trust-funded climate idiots and childishly playing sandbox with your windmills toys.
    1
  3080.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Why bother? Your "I'm so superior to the unwashed masses" attitude is written all over your persona.
    1
  3081.  @aloneinanearthship4010  Well then at least you'll at be being honest, about your political/climate-quack dishonesty. (See how the IPCC liars operate in the IPCC line item of my climate-crap post.)
    1
  3082.  @aloneinanearthship4010  ?
    1
  3083. Climate change is crap. It is 21st century superstition. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  3084. Want real life, a-kicking, bad-a- experience with a GREENHOUSE GAS? ... Spend a night in the desert without a sleeping bag.
    1
  3085.  @aloneinanearthship4010  ? "I was just getting started." To borrow from Jack Nicholson... some people can't handle the truth.
    1
  3086. Pop Quiz: why is it bad to have political control of education?
    1
  3087.  @aloneinanearthship4010  You censored my criticism of the Democratic-party-controlled and corrupted public education system. How un-American.
    1
  3088. Mike Pompeo says Randi Weingarten is the most dangerous person in the world. https://youtu.be/KY8hDajSOY8
    1
  3089.  @PvtPartzz  Mike Pompeo says Randi Weingarten is the most dangerous person in the world. https://youtu.be/KY8hDajSOY8
    1
  3090. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3091. "The land of naps". :)
    1
  3092. Great work 👍
    1
  3093. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  3094. This is a clickbait title. "Fool me once...."
    1
  3095. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  3096.  @tpog1  Context: rain washing out co2. * Is the ocean basic or acidic?
    1
  3097.  @tpog1  Context: Explanation for MWP, RWP and EWP. * I did. Spent several hours there. It was like waking up TO a nightmare.
    1
  3098. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3099. Double jeopardy.
    1
  3100. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  3101. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3102. Carbon Quackery.
    1
  3103. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  3104. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  3105. And that stupid CNN reporter with obnoxious voice -- who'd does he think he's fooling? Who does the hiring there?
    1
  3106. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  3107. Min 50:00 and the homesteading bit: No, he's practicing glorified subsistence farming. Yes, that's a good life if you an afford it, but most of us have to live trade and division of labor, which he disparages as "consumerism".
    1
  3108.  @bpbpbpbpbpbp  You don't think $60 billion dollars worth of copper benefits mankind? You had a child-abuse education. You can cure yourself by getting a real job.
    1
  3109. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  3110. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  3111. A communist at Google - makes sense.
    1
  3112. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  3113. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3114. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  3115. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  3116. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  3117. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3118. Why do you Millennials talk with this semi-sing-song voice that drops the volume on the last couple words of the sentence? You never hear professional narrators talk like that. [Could you work on not dropping the last couple words of the sentence? The "last word" may be obvious to you, drop with when you drop your voice volume to almost inaudible, it's too hard to hear. It's uncomfortable. It's like you don't want us to hear what you're saying.] If you just "can't help it", maybe you should get a professional narrator to read the text, or have MS Word read the text.
    1
  3119. Min 17:00 California all over again.
    1
  3120. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  3121. Can't understand the accent.
    1
  3122. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    1
  3123. No, More Perfect is the idiot here.
    1
  3124. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  3125. @catsthinkmynameisclaude6955   Absolutely. "Climate Change" is a $trillion industry based on fraud. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  3126.  @aninewforest  Great! First: volcanoes cause warming. Second: volcanoes cause cooling. Conclusion: global warmists eat sh*t.
    1
  3127. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  3128. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  3129.  @jaykanta4326  Context: Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period? All regional? Really? ... How do you know that? Was there global weather-data gathering and recording in 1000 AD? In 200 BC? In 5000 BC?
    1
  3130. Co2 is a ruse anyway.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)  Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3131. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3132. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  3133. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3134. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3135. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3136. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  3137. Inflation - that's an unseen cancer.
    1
  3138. Is coal cheaper than nuclear?
    1
  3139. Can't believe it.
    1
  3140. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3141. No mention of Cuba's stupid/repressive regime, or the roll the New York Times had in retrieving Castro from defeat : 3:47
    1
  3142. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3143. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  3144. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3145. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  3146. Is Two Bit on that stupid non-GMO bandwagon?
    1
  3147. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3148. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    1
  3149. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  3150. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  3151. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3152. He sounds like a CCP shill.
    1
  3153. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  3154. A professional narrator would improve the experience. (No "marbles in the mouth")
    1
  3155. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  3156. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3157. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3158.  @jasonthompson7230  CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism. (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.) CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3159. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  3160. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  3161. Europe is degenerate and condescending with its welfarism which is paid for by American defense spending.
    1
  3162. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3163. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3164.  @christophervanzetta  Good for Toyota. May they win the competition!!!
    1
  3165. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  3166. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3167. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3168. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3169. Information monopoly <--- anti trust.
    1
  3170. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    1
  3171. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3172. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3173. Is the cost of land ("footprint") included?
    1
  3174. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  3175.  @matt697845  I'm jealous. You say that and get likes right away, and I post the following for months and nothing :(
    1
  3176. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3177.  @matt697845  Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud.  YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3178. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    1
  3179.  @sluggo3slug  AGW is a load of it. Just burn coal. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Fusion is a great boondoggle, second only to Renewable Energy.
    1
  3180.  @viperswhip  The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  3181.  @AcornElectron  Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle
    1
  3182.  @jimshreve83  The joke's on us -- the taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  3183.  @cupidok2768  Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle.
    1
  3184. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3185. @mervinreyes3008  You write the check.
    1
  3186. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  3187. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3188. Why do these finance monologs always end up sounding like stupifying self-indulgent gibberish?
    1
  3189. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3190. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3191. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  3192. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  3193. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  3194. "Yeah, right."
    1
  3195. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  3196. Decarbonization is human sacrifice for GW superstition. AGW is BS. I'm getting sick of these thick manipulative British accents.
    1
  3197. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition. AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  3198.  @ThisOneAgain246  Ok.... so what's the problem?
    1
  3199. CCP is CCP-fascist, the West is Femo-Fascist.
    1
  3200. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  3201. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  3202. Home solar panels are for neighborhood bragging rights. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3203. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  3204. Phew - this makes engine work look easy.
    1
  3205. There Is No Warming: https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg Isn't this good news?
    1
  3206.  @theobserver9131  You didn't watch the video with scientific impartiality.
    1
  3207. Assumes too high a math ability and background. I recommend Krista King.
    1
  3208. +Gooscar He could double his audience if he just paused a few moments between paragraphs.
    1
  3209. +Gooscar Aren't you wonderful.
    1
  3210. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  3211. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  3212. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3213. Any mention of the disgusting Hillary Clinton? The $145 million giving to the Clinton Global Initiative to buy approval of the Uranium One deal?
    1
  3214.  @psychohist  Maybe so, but enriching uranium is hugely costly too. (It took 1/6th of the US electricity to enrich the uranium for the Manhattan Project.) A cliche in the nuclear plant-building business is "give them the reactor, sell them the fuel".
    1
  3215.  @psychohist  There's a story on internet about a guy who made his own natural uranium reactor. Spare me your condescension about the nuclear business.
    1
  3216.  @Adi-bo5do  ??? You've got some facts about net electricity production of natural vs. enriched uranium reactors? Please enlighten us. (Don't forget the electricity needed to centrifuge the heavy water.)
    1
  3217. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3218. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3219. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  3220. Fluff piece.
    1
  3221. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3222. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  3223. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3224. WGAS about this clickbait video?
    1
  3225. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3226. Fantastic! A "start here" video for minivan conversions.
    1
  3227. "The ultimate thermocouple." :) How about putting them on the smoke stacks of coal plants? Or the cooling towers of nukes? "Bravo science!"
    1
  3228. Go Tucker!
    1
  3229. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  3230. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3231. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3232. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3233. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  3234. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3235. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3236. Drag queen dogs?
    1
  3237. Is there a moral to this story?
    1
  3238. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  3239. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism! Asian NATO now!
    1
  3240. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    1
  3241. @David-e1b3t  Why have audio of you can't understand it?
    1
  3242. I hear me, me, me....
    1
  3243. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3244. Don't want to divulge their technology before patent/perfecting?
    1
  3245. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  3246. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  3247. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  3248. Bikes are hell for pedestrians and motorists.
    1
  3249. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3250. Why is a country as dirt poor as India making trips to the moon?
    1
  3251. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3252. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3253.  @ronblack7870  Legalized looting apologist?
    1
  3254. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3255. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3256. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3257. My thought too.
    1
  3258. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  3259. Can you do a video on ammonia? (Re: making ammonia fuel to fix the intermittency problem of wind and solar.)
    1
  3260. Fantastic!
    1
  3261.  @Chris-df1zr  I do.
    1
  3262. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence.
    1
  3263. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3264. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  3265.  @scottowens1535   "Climate Change" is a $trillion industry/boondoggle based on fraud. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  3266.  ferkemall  ? Links to what you're talking about?
    1
  3267.  ferkemall  Have to pay for the NHS.
    1
  3268. Too much accent and up/down voice dramatics.
    1
  3269. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  3270. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  3271. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  3272. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  3273. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3274. Bravo!
    1
  3275. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3276. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3277. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3278. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  3279. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3280. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  3281. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3282. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3283. Fantastic! Love this car.
    1
  3284. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3285.  @WhoStoleMyAlias  Uh boy... So stupid. "The Dutch... How can people known for being so smart be so stupid?" Chalk up another one for monumentally stupid government. Trump '24 ! (He warned the Germans about their dependency on Russian gas.)
    1
  3286. How big is the trust fund?
    1
  3287. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3288.  @cyniqueetsérieux  Germany embraced that stupid "green energy" like they embraced Naziism. Sorry to bring that up after all the atonement Germany has done, but how else do you describe it? It's a big national disgrace for such a great country. (Same for the rest of Europe that embraced that global-warming crrrap.)
    1
  3289. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  3290. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    1
  3291. It was a suicide bomb, right?
    1
  3292.  @RTeBokkel  What's a Scooby-do van anyway?
    1
  3293. It's just "a van". Ukrainians use the family car to get around.
    1
  3294. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3295.  @AlanTheBeast100  Sorry, but I think climate change is crap. For one, there were several BIG "climate changes" in the mere blink-of-an-eye window of recorded human history. One of them was the Medieval Warm Periods. Was that caused by SUVs? What's wrong with this picture? Here we have a PhD physicist who has to go back to the books for hour to investigate the science of what these snake-oil climate hustlers are saying (which I'm sure THEY haven't done). What she found was a shaggy dog story that has to go 3 levels deep, and THEN still ends with, "there still a lot of complications in this theory..." And at the end of it, I don't understand this "balance" stuff. Do any of YOU? It the space of two sentences we get "the earth has to get hotter because the stratosphere (beginning at 33,000 feet) got 1-2 degrees colder..." The politics of that are "Now! You peasants! Submit to a 25% reduction in your standard of living and pay up it taxes for trillions of dollars in stupid "green energy" BOONDOGGLES! (Ms. Sabin is German. Germany doesn't have such a good track record in the totality of "green energy" stuff -- either with its performance (see Peter Zeihan), or its making itself dependent on Russian natural gas.) How many of YOU understand this "balance" stuff? Climate change is 21st century superstition -- any bad weather event is YOUR FAULT because YOU drove that evil ICE. So is "renewable energy" and "carbon neutrality".... which then becomes an excuse for the stupid boondoggle of "green". Here is a primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM William Happer discusses ozone and climate quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGn-6kGoD0c&t=1320 Thomas Sowell https://youtube.com/shorts/il-9eOwZuFs?feature=share No climate cause and effect: https://youtu.be/Cz45fETw078 Climate elites fly private https://youtube.com/shorts/mBBX4Z2IlfU?feature=share Stupid rising sea levels. https://youtu.be/RxRWcygrKUE The stupid recycling ritual: https://youtu.be/NLkfpjJoNkA Stupid HYDROGEN -- another science-project boondoggle for the tax-funded climate quacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zklo4Z1SqkE&t=10s * * * Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians. * * * ..
    1
  3296.  @briancatt  Well said. In other words, "anthro" global warming is a load of cr*p and a boondoggle for climate hustlers and White-coat Witch Doctors. But you wouldn't know that from Sabine's video, or 99% of the comments. How about putting your copying your comment onto other threads if comments? Especially the top one?
    1
  3297. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  3298.  @bobloblaw10001  Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  3299. How much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  3300.  @SkeletalMisunderstanding   @Guillotined Chemistry  I just want a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  3301.  @chrishofmann8779  In other words the earth is some sort of Jolly Green Giant? Is this Gulliver's Travels and we're the Lilliputians?
    1
  3302. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  3303. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3304. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT reactors -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3305. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  3306. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3307. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  3308.  @TerryBollinger  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? Thanks, but it's not answering my question. I'm not asking about Venus, I'm asking about here on the earth surface: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  3309.  @WolfgangSourdeau  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? Correct, that's not what I was asking. I'm not having any luck getting a straight answer to this simple question.
    1
  3310.  @TerryBollinger  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? * Really?... I hear the word "trapped" all the time on this board and I don't see the users getting corrected on their usage. Ok... How about "absorbed before re-emitting"?
    1
  3311. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  3312.  @mbvgvskvrs868  Context: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? * * * Ok... I've always heard from the climate hustlers what a "powerful" greenhouse gas CO2 was. So you're saying, "no, H2O is more 'powerful' than CO2". Ok, how much more 'powerful'? I'm still trying to get a straight answer to the question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule? "Molecule to Molecule, please". Every time, I get double-talk for an answer.
    1
  3313. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3314.  @melb5996  Context: what caused MWP? Roman warm period? Egyptian warm period? * What causes the cycles? The AGWists have an explanation for glaciation ("ice ages") but are dismissive and evasive about MWP, RWP, and EWP.
    1
  3315. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3316. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3317. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  3318. Can't take the voice after a while.
    1
  3319. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3320. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3321. It's a whitewash.
    1
  3322. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3323. Patreon site?
    1
  3324.  @paulsengupta971  It's such a load of kurapp.
    1
  3325. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3326. Storm shadow.
    1
  3327. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  3328. Please get a less dramatic narrator. I can't listen to it long.
    1
  3329. The embarrassment of riches.
    1
  3330. 1) Free up truck drivers with self-driving trucks. 2) Free up the petroleum industry with thorium power. 3) Free up the glucose farmers with synthetic glucose production.
    1
  3331.  @richardacevedo280  What is "systems integration"?
    1
  3332. AGE is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3333. "Yes".
    1
  3334. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3335.  @S_Curves  Do you have a real job?
    1
  3336. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  3337. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3338. ,👍👍👍👍
    1
  3339. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  3340. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  3341. Is net metering part of the ROI?
    1
  3342. What is AMD?
    1
  3343. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  3344. Yes, Instagram does that.
    1
  3345. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3346. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  3347.  @danwelterweight4137  The stench of your shill is nauseating.
    1
  3348.  @danwelterweight4137  What do you use to wipe the blood off your hands?
    1
  3349.  @shinji5217  Your CCP shilling is an insult to humanity.
    1
  3350.  @mimiphuc  Since you are a CCP shill, you're showing that life in China under the CCP is insane.
    1
  3351. Can't understand the accent.
    1
  3352. @EIRE55  His thick accent and provincial inflections degrade the experience for the majority of English speakers.
    1
  3353. @EIRE55  Needs better mic and less accent. Can't listen to it.
    1
  3354. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  3355. Europe has a bad case of Femo-Fascism.
    1
  3356. Any mention of the disgusting Hillary Clinton? The $145 million giving to the Clinton Global Initiative to buy approval of the Uranium One deal?
    1
  3357. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  3358. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3359.  @lunayen  It's a YouTube video -- I was invited to watch.
    1
  3360.  @lunayen  Maybe I want to hear the material I was invited to listen to.
    1
  3361. Well done -- thanks. Question: if Java isn't the language for "startup culture", could you do an expose on what is/are the language(s) of the "start-up scene"?
    1
  3362. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3363. Sorry, but no, see the Peter Zeihan videos about the 9 strategic gaps the Russia has to occupy and fortify with troops. "Ukraine is just on the way to a couple of those gaps, i.e., Poland." Russian is like Germany, only further into the Asian interior.
    1
  3364. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  3365. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3366. This is a stupidly constructed argument: (1) the government decides subsidies, not you. (2) all subsidies are forced transfer of wealth (stealing) which makes you an advocate of stealing for your stupid gee-whiz science projects.
    1
  3367. +elijah mikle No objection about corn and oil subsidies - they should be abolished. And your crap shouldn't get started.
    1
  3368. +hg2 Subsidies for your Kid's Lemonade Stand business.
    1
  3369. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3370. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3371. "The Magic Sentences Of Liberty" "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only two kind of laws: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights <--- where fascism lives "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." (We can eliminate 90% of the cr*p and conflict we call politics with first principles of Liberty.)
    1
  3372. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3373.  @fredschuttenbeld4571  Co2 is a ruse anyway. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3374. Hey France... How's the Multi-Culti?
    1
  3375. This idiot-media post has 2x as many Thumbs Down as Thumbs Up. This is very unusual. Most videos -- "no matter what their topic" -- get more positives than negatives (right?). Here's a "prime time" piece that breaks that mold -- interesting.
    1
  3376. Ridiculous boondoggle waste for enviro-quack feel-goodery.
    1
  3377.  @garywilliams1846  Recycling is a boondoggle for rich kids who don't want to make an honest living.
    1
  3378.  @zenokarlsbach4292  Forced recycling is a rich-kid boondoggle load of cr*p.
    1
  3379.  @zenokarlsbach4292  Are you THAT ignorant of economics, or are you pulling my leg?
    1
  3380.  @bingbong6422  More climate-quack boondoggle for spoiled rich kids who can't handle a real job? BTW, what is SLC?
    1
  3381.  @bingbong6422  TY What is an agreeable, accommodating chap like you doing among all these climate quacks and koolaid drinkers trying to shake down the taxpayer for rich-kid boondoggles?
    1
  3382.  @bingbong6422  Bless your positivity and productivity. * On the flip side of the coin, these koolaid drinkers and climate quacks want to impose no-benefit hardships on the working poor. THAT is criminal, let alone stupid. Maybe you never thought of it that way. But do you really want to be in league with people like that?
    1
  3383. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3384.  @kirigowachira  What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3385. Too... halting... staccato... voice... delivery.
    1
  3386. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3387. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3388. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3389. This happened in the 70s.
    1
  3390. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3391. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3392. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3393. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3394. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3395. Boondoggle, anyone? Fusion wins the prize for BOONDOGGLE, but this looks like a challenger.
    1
  3396. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3397. F--- Cuba.
    1
  3398. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  3399. Great idea!
    1
  3400. Unbelievable.
    1
  3401. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3402. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3403. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3404. Well done.
    1
  3405. Where did Russia get 20km rolls of fiber optic?
    1
  3406.  @plektosgaming  Yes -- this car reminds me of the 2CV (still beloved by millions), with air conditioning and a sturdier cage. I hope they can stay in business a few years and work the bugs out -- just like TOYOTA did. There are millions of retirement-community residents who would love a car like this.
    1
  3407. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  3408. Phew... watch Blue Collar Logic: Chuck Berry vs Bruce Springsteen, Two Visions of America https://youtube.com/watch?v=LMdfi46TmXM&si=Sfq-BY5mLZ_9rQsZ It's a shame that kids aren't taught that work can be a raising of the human condition, a better life for all, like Elon Musk and Thomas Edison.  That is American "can-doism" which The Left has a vested interest in demoralizing.  People excited about enterprise don't make good voters for the Democratic Party. [The cheating of the middle class out the price-reduction benefits of productivity increases doesn't help, either.]
    1
  3409. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3410. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3411. As much as we watch Peter Zeihan for his geopolitics, he is a never-had-a-real-job ivory tower elitist. He does not understand the American middle class, the American value of liberty, or what it's like to work for a living. He is the academic equivalent of Hollywood idiot-celebrity. Soon he'll be telling us how great it is to eat bugs. "Hey Peter! Please go spend a week under one of those windmills you think are so hippie-cool!"
    1
  3412. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3413. Insurance policy: preserve and protect The 2nd Amendment.
    1
  3414. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  3415. Wow! That's a condescending remark. What about Americans?
    1
  3416.  @yeetingat100subs9  Who is making decisions in these idiot countries?
    1
  3417. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  3418. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3419. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  3420. America used to be a can-do place. Now it's PBS "conservation and efficiency". Tighten your belts! You groveling peasants!
    1
  3421. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  3422. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3423. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  3424. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3425. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3426. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  3427. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3428. CCP shilling. Disgraceful.
    1
  3429. Sabine should give credit to KIRK SORENSEN for uncovering and publicizing the Thorium/MSR work done in the 70s at Oakridge Lab by Alvin Weinberg and Team. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&si=auiNDKSxe98bEPHe
    1
  3430. Sorry, can't handle the sing-songy accent. The less accent, the better.
    1
  3431.  @estebanr7877  That's a stupid answer. "He doesn't have an accent meeee..." Well duhhh. The American accent is neutral and has the widest audience.
    1
  3432. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  3433. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3434. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3435.  @Shewas-kathybates  Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  3436. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3437.  @chemoboy-dannypheleps9234  No, the saying negative things about a positive situation. People are paying big money to live this Florida life, and he comes along and makes spoiled-brat comments and innuendos about "urban sprawl". It's one thing to disparage run down Godforsaken dumps, but quite another to be snooty about people working hard to make good neighborhoods.
    1
  3438. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3439. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3440. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3441. China propaganda algorithm.
    1
  3442. Can't take the effeminate voice.
    1
  3443. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  3444. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3445. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3446. Here's something for the idiots of Renewable Energy: Sooner or later you greenies are going to need to grow up and learn how economies work. - hint government people understand nothing of economies other than how to rape them. These G-morons decided "woke' power (power that doesn't really work) was a great idea for them, not us, so they decided to steal some money from some ratepayers in order to pay others to stimulate the growth or power that really doesn't work - ie wind and solar. In the real world, the one that really works, there is something called supply and demand and these things regulate the price of everything fairly. Your butcher buys his beef by the side and pays more for it than the meat packing plant did who in turn paid more for steer than it cost the rancher to produce it. Get it so far? Now when you buy that beefsteak at the butcher's shop he's going to get his markup as well, so you as the end consumer are going to have to pay a lot more for it per pound than the rancher was paid for it. Next time you want a beefsteak drive out to a ranch and buy your steer on the hoof - then you slaughter it, age it carve it up sell the inedible parts to dogfood processors and the like and eat the rest of it on the cheap - no you want the value that all those who added value to the meat along the whole length of the supply chain don't you? Or do you buy your steaks on the hoof? Or do you expect to pay the ranchers price at your favorite steakhouse as well? It's that way with electricity too, you cannot expect the power company to buy power back from you at retail rates when they don't even need or want the power. With that business model they will go bankrupt as soon as their investors are wiped out. If that rancher were to dine out at your favorite steakhouse why not demand that your ignorant politicians make the restaurant buy his on-the-hoof steer from him on demand at the same rate per pound that they charge you for a 16 oz prime rib? The problem is, as with all government planned economies, sooner or later everyone will want to receive the grift instead of paying for it, when that happens the lights go out - permanently. The most ignorant feature of all of this is that it is supposed to solve some problem that the grifters dreamed up but that does not actually exist so solar panels and wind turbines only create huge problems, they solve nothing - time to wake up you dizzy Californians.
    1
  3447. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3448. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  3449. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  3450. Could use a professional narrator.
    1
  3451. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3452. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  3453.  @llschnitz  Yes. This movie was a complete load of cr*p and Rob Reiner really IS a meathead -- and that's putting it charitably given how this stupid movie is an attempt to SMEER the American Christian.
    1
  3454. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  3455. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3456.  @infinitehexington  Very funny. * * * South Africa made its own gasoline for decades from coal (Sasol). This EV stuff is stupid. I wish Porshe well, but the manufacturing of gasoline has already been mastered and proven by Sasol. Maybe Porsche wants to appease the global-warming tree-huggers with "carbon neutrality". That's stupid too.
    1
  3457.  @jhfl1881  ? Okay... so it's a "high-risk" profession. All the more reason to have a large "pool" of at-least knowledgeable people to do the jobs?
    1
  3458. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3459. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  3460. Sounds like 'blah blah' after a while. I'd consider getting a professional voice over b/c the voice here gets tiring to listen too.
    1
  3461. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  3462.  @johannwatzinger1122  That too. But that's not good enough. The white-coat priests of climate dogma say volcanos aren't a significant factor in co2. YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE BASTARDS PULL RICKSHAWS!
    1
  3463.  @johannwatzinger1122  Context: we must send the middle class back to pulling rickshaws to have any effect on climate. * In other words, the solution to climate change is population reduction. Ok -- MAKE THE BASTARDS PULL RICKSHAWS until they croak. Lower living standards means lower life span -- mission accomplished.
    1
  3464. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3465.  @markharmon4963  Absolutely not. AGW is a load of it on many levels. See Climate Discussion Nexus for 200 videos on AGW being 21st century superstition, and "renewable energy" being 21st century human sacrifice and pyramid building.
    1
  3466. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3467. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3468. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's stragegy good or bad?
    1
  3469. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  3470. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    1
  3471. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3472. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3473. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  3474. It was a suicide truck bomb?
    1
  3475.  @anglaismoyen  LOL
    1
  3476. The moose weighed too much to lift into the truck bed.
    1
  3477. "No words left to describe... "
    1
  3478. Ha! In other words, it's a BOONDOGGLE! Are you sure you're not a Trump supporter?
    1
  3479. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  3480. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  3481. Ranked Choice Voting is a Soros-funded initiative. It castrates the primary process in favor of incumbents. It is a typical Soros POS.
    1
  3482. Round numbers: 1) Ok, electricity is 4x more expensive to heat with the fossil fuel. 2) the electric heat pump produces 4x as much heat as consumed to extract it from the water. 3) so a big heat pump breaks even with fossil fuel, BEFORE spending several thousand dollars for the heat pump equipment and installation. "Next..."
    1
  3483. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3484.  @Will-xk4nm  Prove me wrong.
    1
  3485.  @Will-xk4nm  Income Inequality - yes, obviously. Chronic poverty - yes, not so obviously, esp. to people like you.
    1
  3486.  @Will-xk4nm  Look at the graph, you communist-koolaid inebriated ----.
    1
  3487. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3488. Who's Stan Lee?
    1
  3489. Needs professional narrator or just machine reading.
    1
  3490. I wish he didn't... have... such... a... staccato... voice...
    1
  3491. Don't drink the kool aid of climate quackery (see Bob Carter videos).
    1
  3492. Hes starting to sound like a CCP shill.
    1
  3493. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3494. Bravo!
    1
  3495. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  3496. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  3497. Well done! Thank you.
    1
  3498.  @ProjectFarm  All young people should watch this as a lesson in critical thinking and the scientific method :)
    1
  3499. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  3500.  @Nakamura217  When are you supposed to learn it?
    1
  3501. God speed!
    1
  3502. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  3503. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3504. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  3505. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3506. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  3507. Sounds great!
    1
  3508. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3509. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    1
  3510. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  3511. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  3512. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  3513. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3514. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  3515. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China..
    1
  3516. Try Frank Tipler. (Search on playlists.)
    1
  3517. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  3518. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3519. "hefty insurance premiums"
    1
  3520. How much is the taxpayer getting screwed for these redundant, unnecessary, superstition-driven gee whiz schemes?
    1
  3521. After seeing the FOOTPRINT of that stupid wind farm on coastal property, I'm thinking "those high-tension power lines are starting to look pretty good."
    1
  3522.  @davefroman4700  Big sh*t. It's a boondoggle liberal arts millennials who flunked out of engineering school.
    1
  3523. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  3524. Go Donald! Go America!
    1
  3525. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  3526. Thank you. But too much accent and sing-song the voice. For what a good narration voice sounds like, see Peter Zeihan videos.
    1
  3527. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  3528. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  3529. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  3530. Yes,... I think it's a little click-baity that he starts out with "a lot of negative press about The Villages". There is some "gossip" about TV, but I'm not aware of anything significantly "negative".
    1
  3531. F--- Cuba.
    1
  3532. Same for India, Haiti, Balkans, Northern Ireland, Belgium, China... Nothing unique about Cypress.
    1
  3533. "An accident" ... yeah right. Chalk up another fake news broadcast.
    1
  3534. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  3535. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  3536. Cackling Kamala and Biden documents.
    1
  3537. What was China's bizarre claim????
    1
  3538.  clarencespangle2599  He didn't state what China's bizarre claim about the US vis a vis Taiwan was. Can you?
    1
  3539.  clarencespangle2599  ? Did he mention Black Dragon Society in the video? If so, what minute?
    1
  3540.  clarencespangle2599  ?
    1
  3541. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    1
  3542.  @dremac33  ^^ A stupidly elitist remark. Please do the world a favor and get a real job. The "wealthy" cities are Democrat because the Democratic party can tax the wealthy to buy they votes of the "poor". Like I said, please get a real job.
    1
  3543. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3544. Another Man-Child legacy media report.
    1
  3545. Fantastic! I was in the programming business (struggling with IMS) when "Sequel" was just becoming available. ... Phew. "The rest is (Oracle) history."
    1
  3546. "The next Jackie Kennedy." God speed. God bless.
    1
  3547. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3548. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  3549. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3550. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  3551.  @davidm4160  Yes -- "game show talk". Good one.
    1
  3552.  @rubenjaimes1194  That's because you have no taste in media and are a manipulable masochist when it comes to media consumption.
    1
  3553.  @mariog4674  Yes, it's called dialogue.
    1
  3554. Plastics aren't the problem, slobs are.
    1
  3555. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3556. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  3557. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  3558. Get rid of that evil CCP and all these problems go away.
    1
  3559. In other words, we can give ourselves a "cancer vaccination" by exposing ourselves to high radiation?
    1
  3560. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  3561. Min 9:07 "No" -- it SHOULD be called a "Dark Fleet" because they "spoof" their their GPS locations and outright turn off their transponders. I.e., they are HIDING from the sanctions regime. China Uncensored channel has a story on this. It's causing big problems and risks throughout the shipping world.
    1
  3562. What is DRM?
    1
  3563. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3564. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  3565. Snap is welfare. You're not supposed to ask questions, you stupid person?
    1
  3566. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3567. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    1
  3568. Any mention of the disgusting Hillary Clinton? The $145 million giving to the Clinton Global Initiative to buy approval of the Uranium One deal?
    1
  3569. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  3570. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  3571. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3572. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3573. AGW is a load of it. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3574. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  3575. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3576. Can't watch this in one sitting. Glad you're doing well, coming back. Thanks for making a meticulous video about this. May it prevent/reduce future accidents.
    1
  3577. A professional narrator or machine reading would help. It starts to sound like the pre-flight instructions on an airline.
    1
  3578. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism! Asian NATO now!
    1
  3579. This guy sounds and looks like a never-worked academic twerp. Anyone who calls Chinese leadership "intelligent" doesn't know the first thing about Chinese history. Is this guy a shill for the CCP? They're out there.
    1
  3580.  @李荣-n7s  As a CCP shill, you are the 21st century version of the Nazi collaborator.
    1
  3581.  @malachkah  For the CCP/Nazi collaborators on this pathetic channel... https://youtu.be/b3z-oANZ604
    1
  3582.  @malachkah  ? Boycott those disgusting Peking olympics.
    1
  3583.  @NicolasSauveur  Sure. "You sound like a CCP shill." Boycott the 1936-redux Peking olympics.
    1
  3584.  @NicolasSauveur  https://youtu.be/KNYhUnYz-xk
    1
  3585.  @NicolasSauveur  CCP sleazebags and their money laundering power struggles in Macao https://youtu.be/Ll3Cjr5sx74
    1
  3586.  @NP1066  The idiots and CCP shills on this board should start with Adam Smith.
    1
  3587. Any mention of the disgusting Hillary Clinton? The $145 million giving to the Clinton Global Initiative to buy approval of the Uranium One deal?
    1
  3588.  @briancarton1804  Firstly, I'm thinking of Argentina: - they used to make them there, - 40% of the population is poor and need jobs, - if it can be made cheaply enough, it could be competitive in markets like that. Secondly, they are so simple they can be made on an "artisanal" basis, i.e., they come in kits. That's what I hear Iran did. Sounds like a great way to get started.
    1
  3589.  @briancarton1804  Artisanal? All those motorcycle- countries of Asia and Africa? The Beetle is 1/3 heavier and 2x the cc's Somewhere "in there" is room for the 2cv as an option. (Provided governments don't kill it with regulation.)
    1
  3590.  @briancarton1804  Argentina: The negative arguments you make are actually positive ones: - Argentina has a lot of poor people; poor people need cheap cars. - Poor people need a lot of simple jobs to get back on their feet: making 2CVs could contribute. "Poor people making cheap cars for poor people."
    1
  3591.  @briancarton1804  Yes, I bet you do.
    1
  3592. Am I hearing another "me me me me" video? (Or is it just 'me'?) [Who is this guy?]
    1
  3593.  @anzacman5  A judge of character, like everyone else.
    1
  3594. Well said, JD!
    1
  3595. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  3596.  @yoma2k279  Ok. My real question is how much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  3597.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Really? Can one h2o molecule really "trap" 10x more energy than one co2 molecule? Is there agreement on the floor about this?
    1
  3598.  @annaclarafenyo8185  I'm still just asking about 1 molecule of co2 gas vs. 1 molecule of h2o gas. Answer?
    1
  3599.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Seems like a crucial detail and a simple question, and I can't get a straight answer anywhere!
    1
  3600.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Do you expect the general audience to understand that? I can't. Can't you tell me that co2 traps xxx% more energy than h2o does?
    1
  3601.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Is "scatters" the same thing as "trap's" or "absorbs"?
    1
  3602.  @anotherelvis  I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3603. Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science.
    1
  3604.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Yes, I think 1) you didn't watch the video, 2) you're confusing surface temps for tropical tropo temps.
    1
  3605. F--- Cuba.
    1
  3606. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  3607. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3608. Stolen election in 2020, ... Trojan horse in 2024
    1
  3609. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3610. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3611. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  3612. Watch out for Peter's smugness and condescension. Don't underestimate the Chinese. Underestimate them at your peril.
    1
  3613. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  3614.  @Petronka  Thanks, but ??? I still don't get the difference. Both conscripts and mobilized are FORCED into the military. What difference does it make what they're called?
    1
  3615.  @Petronka  No. "Conscripts" means drafted, which means forced. So I don't see any difference between conscripts and mobilized.
    1
  3616. Get a real job, before you make bus sick.
    1
  3617. Go Vivek!
    1
  3618. Great idea!
    1
  3619. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  3620. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3621. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  3622. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  3623. Has he done one on data fraud from the witch doctors of climate quackery? Like the IPCC?
    1
  3624. Thank you. But too much accent and sing-song the voice. For what a good narration voice sounds like, see Peter Zeihan videos.
    1
  3625. F--- Cuba.
    1
  3626. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  3627. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  3628. Are there any 2CV fans out there? We all love the 2CV.  The 2CV is to cars what bread is to food. Wouldn't it be great if it could go back into production, giving millions of people this transportation option?  Citroen AMI:  The usual response to that wish is that it's impossible because the 2CV can't pass safety regulations.  But here's a loophole for that: Citroen itself is selling a car called the Ami, which is legally a "quadracycle" -- I guess that's a motorcycle with 4 wheels.  The Ami itself uses the 2CV logo on its grill (see this article called "The Electrek review: This tiny Citroën Ami microcar is just weird enough to work". ) Here's a quote about it's being designated as a quadracycle, "It’s technically considered to be a quadricycle, a type of vehicle classification in Europe that falls somewhere between a motorcycle and a standard car. That helps it thread the needle of low cost and low regulations while still offering much the feeling of an actual car. It may not have a dozen airbags like some cars (or even one airbag), but you weren’t planning on hitting anything anyway, right?" "Largely an artisanal procedure": Here's an article about when the 2CV was produced in Iran: "Citroën Saipac 2CV, Jiane Sedan, Jiane Pickup and Mehari".  It describes the manufacturing as "largely an artisanal procedure", i.e., they are hand assembled. ... That means a high school kid can put one together in their back yard (!).   How many millions of high school kids wouldn't consider that as an option for their first car???  Burton 2CV Parts:  This place in The Netherlands -- Burton 2CV parts -- has several videos about putting together a whole 2CV with purchased parts.  They don't come out and say it -- but it's hard not to make that conclusion: "You can build your own 2CV!" Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine!  Can the 2CV hold its own on a highway?  This video makes it look like it can:  Modded 2CV: 720cc - speed machine! (channel is Hub Nut).  It talks about some minor-looking improvements to the spark-advance, giving it highway-capable speeds.  Rust is a problem?  Here is a video about hot-dipping the whole body in zinc: Fully Zink coated body!! The daily driver citroën 2cv6 real solution against rust restoration. 2cv    ^^ a hot-dipped zinc-coated 2CV will last a lifetime or more, in terms of rust.  Argentina: 2CVs used to be made in Argentina, and now it has an extremely free-market president and administration.  I bet Argentina would embrace re-introduction of the 2CV with open arms.  (And its mostly a flat, mild-weather country -- it should do well there.) Let's figure out a way to get this back into production and make it a transportation option for millions.  There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho).  There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car.  There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  3629. Does it have air conditioning?
    1
  3630. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  3631. $120.00 for that much value? Awesome!
    1
  3632. +Project Farm Awesome again. By the looks of it, every bike in the world will have one of these. (Americans should be scared that the hard working Asians can produce this much value, but that's another conversation. Meanwhile, enjoy!)
    1
  3633. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3634.  @Meghnaaad  Wait 'til france turns into another Iran. Time will slow down for you then.
    1
  3635. Needs lapel mic.
    1
  3636. Any mention of the disgusting Hillary Clinton? The $145 million giving to the Clinton Global Initiative to buy approval of the Uranium One deal?
    1
  3637. Gee.... a huge, gigantic explosion of a CONTAINER bound for the mid-east from China? Gosh! I wonder what that could be?
    1
  3638.  @jeffrains9569  In other words, they were better/cheaper at making lumber (including shipping cost) than the Pac-Northwest?
    1
  3639.  @jeffrains9569  China, right? Wages and safety is more expensive than a round trip across the Pacific. ???
    1
  3640. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3641. Has this idiot ever heard of vehicular homicide?
    1
  3642. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  3643. It's a sandbox boondoggle for propeller heads.
    1
  3644. It's a sandbox boondoggle for propeller heads.
    1
  3645. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  3646. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  3647. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  3648. What's the point? Government meddling is good? Or Government meddling is bad? Are the Freedom House rankings wrong? Are there freer places than Hong Kong?
    1
  3649.  @ezekielvonlichenstein3476  Got it. I've got my guard up here because this is a woke-idiocy video. Hard to tell where people are coming from.
    1
  3650.  @sweetcait  You were what "too"?
    1
  3651. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  3652. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  3653. Fusion is the world's 2nd greatest boondoggle, next to renewable energy itself. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3654. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3655. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  3656. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  3657. Great stuff, but I wish you would drop your voice down to near-zero audibility at the end of your sentences. (It seems to be an "millennial" idiosyncrasy.)
    1
  3658. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  3659. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3660. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  3661. This is obvious CCP propaganda and she is a CCP shill. This city is in TIBET -- not "China".
    1
  3662. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  3663. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3664. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  3665. "Yeah, right."
    1
  3666.  @patkonelectric  Space cadets-ville.
    1
  3667. Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .
    1
  3668. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  3669. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3670. A fluff piece. Why is this crap showing up in my list?
    1
  3671. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3672. It's gee-wiz "I'd rather do this than get a real job" hype, for a kid's lemonade stand business.
    1
  3673. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3674. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3675.  @d.h.5407  CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3676.  @bhishmadesai6500  CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3677. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  3678. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  3679. A professional narrator or machine reading would help. It starts to sound like the pre-flight instructions on an airline.
    1
  3680. I think most cool/spent fuel is already put in casks.
    1
  3681.  @ul5mw  "Get a real job."
    1
  3682.  @ul5mw  No. "you" are the joke.
    1
  3683.  @ul5mw  Sure. Keep an eye on them. They are liable for making a mess. Their insurance agents will keep an eye on them. The oil sands in Canada have had this worked out for years.
    1
  3684.  @ul5mw  Pollution in the Canadian tar sands??? I'm shocked... SHOCKED!!!! * BFD. Canadian tar sand pollution is like the Pope being Catholic. You need to get a real job.
    1
  3685.  @ul5mw  WGAS? When people complain about lack of surgical cleanliness at a freaking OIL SANDS project it shows they have too much time on their hands and need to get a real job.
    1
  3686.  @ul5mw  Get a real job.
    1
  3687. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  3688. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3689. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  3690. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3691. Is CO2 glorified humidity?
    1
  3692. How much more heat/energy does a co2 molecule trap than an h2o molecule?
    1
  3693. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  3694. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3695. Here's something for all you self-important eco-pagans: We're not here to do good things for the earth. The earth is here to do good things for us.
    1
  3696.  @AlanTheBeast100  I think I know where you're going with that and I think you full of crap. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3697.  @AlanTheBeast100  Typical snooty condescending Canadian. Quebec Hydro --- that's easy for YOU to say when you've got the topology. Wind? You're comparing batteries-not-included wind with hydro? Please. You're out to lunch, like so many other space cadets in this business.
    1
  3698.  @AlanTheBeast100  Wind good? Tell that to stupid Germany and its saved-by-a-warm-winter green energy foolishness.
    1
  3699. How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  3700. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3701.  @theeraphatsunthornwit6266  i.e., superstition.
    1
  3702. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  3703. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3704. LSA 👍
    1
  3705. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3706. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  3707.  @mikesatran1067  Home solar is high-class neighborhood bragging rights and cost shifting to poor people.
    1
  3708. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3709. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  3710. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  3711. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3712. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3713. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  3714. 👍👍👍
    1
  3715. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  3716. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3717. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3718. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant.  CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  3719. Philippines is high on the list for Americans on Social Security who want to live cheaply.
    1
  3720. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3721. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3722. How about skipping the wind/solar and using one of those "power-tower" things.
    1
  3723.  @aerocodes  How about Chinese CCP shills? I make it a challenge to spot them and call them out.
    1
  3724. The Magic Sentences Of Liberty We can eliminate 90% of the crap we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty: "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only two kind of laws: Type 1) those that protect property rights, <--- where pursuit of happiness takes place Type 2) and those that attack property rights <--- where fascism lives "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property."
    1
  3725. They lie right to your face.
    1
  3726. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3727.  @strategicthinker8899  1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3728. Sam criticism. "You want to hear yourself talk." We didn't come here to listen to you, we came here to watch the video. Please play the video first, then do the frame-by-frame analysis for people who are interested in that.
    1
  3729. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  3730. Stupidity superficial reporting, as usual.
    1
  3731. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  3732. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3733. Does anyone see how STUPID this is compared to thorium molten salt reactors? See the Kirk Sorenson videos. The Taxpayers deserve a refund for this 50 years of fusion boondoggle.
    1
  3734. Right. It's such cr*p.
    1
  3735. Trump's "Robin". Go Vivek!
    1
  3736. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3737. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  3738. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3739. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  3740. Brave woman!
    1
  3741. Interesting video, but it sounds like it's coming from a trust fund life. Trust fund? How big?
    1
  3742.  @DarkKittycat  Who's Sam Lufti?
    1
  3743. Set up an escrow account and pay into that?
    1
  3744. Would a Deluth-Minneapolis canal be worth building?
    1
  3745. Needs a professional narrator.
    1
  3746. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3747. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3748. Yes, WGAS about this clickbait video?
    1
  3749. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant.  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  3750. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3751. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  3752. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  3753. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  3754. 1) CO2 is not a pollutant.  2) There's no such thing as anthropogenic global warming.  3) There's nothing wrong with burning fossil fuel. 4) "Renewable Energy" is a kid's lemonade-stand business model.  5) "Net Zero" is 21st century human-sacrifice and superstition.  6) "Green energy" is a fad that people will get tired of.  7) CO2's impact on climate is trivial or non-existent. 8) Climate is controlled by solar activity: (More --> less cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/less clouds/warmer /Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period ("Ice Man of the Alps)) (Less --> more cosmic rays(particles) 'get through'/more clouds/colder/Little Ice Age--Maunder Minimum sun spots)
    1
  3755. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  3756. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  3757. @MonkeyJedi99  Get a real job.
    1
  3758. Go Trump! MAGA!
    1
  3759. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  3760. Stupid Noam Chomsky complaining about Femo-Fascism? That's rich!
    1
  3761. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3762. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3763. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  3764. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap.
    1
  3765. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3766. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3767. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3768.  @douginorlando6260  Absolutely! 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation -- 10,000,000 degrees operating temperature. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. (600 degrees operating temperature.) Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly spend???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. It that's how these propeller-head science geeks feel about it, THEY CAN WRITE THE CHECK. BTW, all those cavalier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  3769. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3770.  @fontane007  Poor critical thinking. Pro-inflation koolaid inebriated.
    1
  3771. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  3772. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  3773. Too much accent.
    1
  3774. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3775. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3776. Whitewash.
    1
  3777. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  3778. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  3779.  @gladitsnotme  Globally. What consumes the most energy - HVAC or transportation? (Stupid California is an exception to everything... They're trying to make HVAC more expensive than transportation.)
    1
  3780. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3781. We're the miners massacred?
    1
  3782. What's with the hat?
    1
  3783. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3784. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3785. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3786. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  3787. Gee.... a huge, gigantic explosion of a CONTAINER bound for the mid-east from China? Gosh! I wonder what that could be?
    1
  3788.  @taiwanluthiers  With an explosion that big, I'd be surprised if it wasn't big news all over the shipping world. How do you get an explosion that big without the stuff being munitions-grade explosives to begin with? I.e., China was shipping explosives to the middle east. Somehow that's not a surprise, unless you're their insurance company.
    1
  3789.  @taiwanluthiers  Maybe so. I'm no expert, but I've watched a lot of Ukraine bombing videos. My guess is you don't get an explosion that big without the stuff being deliberately explosive to begin with.
    1
  3790. Absolutely.
    1
  3791. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  3792. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong.  There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  3793. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  3794. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3795. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  3796. Flood YouTube with semi-conductor how-to videos. Record all the courses and put them on YouTube. Berkeley is starting that with their nuclear engineering courses. Put them all online! Once everything is online, start PAYING PEOPLE to master the material. Instead of students paying for tuition, STUDENTS GET PAID TO MASTER MATERIAL.
    1
  3797. What do you expect from a stupid democrat?
    1
  3798. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  3799. RN is an idiot.
    1
  3800. Spare us the unctuous advocacy of environmental BOONDOGGLES.
    1
  3801. @2freeIvX Oh... year right. Make the already--poor Indian taxpayer pay for this rich-kid BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  3802.  @thegrinchiam1033  Grow up.
    1
  3803.  @avantikabadgujar8467  Load of cr*p.
    1
  3804.  @LolaBowla  Get a real job.
    1
  3805.  @GEOsustainable  Right, and he STILL can't make money at it. So this rich-kid is asking for a peasants tax handout for his rich-kid boondoggle.
    1
  3806.  @NaderNabilart  "Helping the planet"... Spend a year supporting yourself with a real job, then come to me with this cr*p about "helping the planet".
    1
  3807.  @michaelfrench3396  Fine... YOU PAY FOR IT.
    1
  3808.  @NaderNabilart  How insightful, inspiring, and mature.
    1
  3809.  @michaelfrench3396  You aren't paying attention to this conversation: Rich Kid wants destitute Indians to pay more taxes for his rich-kid, feel-good, BOONDOGGLE. And YOU are ok with that. Please.
    1
  3810.  @michaelfrench3396  He wants his boondoggle subsidized. This thread agrees. You have poor critical thinking skills.
    1
  3811.  @michaelfrench3396  Elon and Jeff PRODUCE. Rich-kid no-real-job loafers just complain.
    1
  3812.  @junelmar3874  See my posts.
    1
  3813.  MOHAMMAD ARIF  Poor people forced to subsidize rich-kid boondoggles.
    1
  3814.  @idontknow6859  Poor critical thinking: Who is "they"?
    1
  3815.  @marcomeeuwse9263  Support yourself with a Real Job for a year, then tell me about "government support" (i.e. taxes, your disingenuousness keeps you from saying) and "banning plastics" (idiocy).
    1
  3816.  @kimchiba4570  1) work a real job before saying something that elitist. 2) see other posts.
    1
  3817.  @fransjebik8554  India is famous for its hideous squalor, and YOU want their money spent on rich-kid feel-good boondoggles... No wonder India has spent most of its life in squalor.
    1
  3818.  @marcomeeuwse9263  Then you don't have a real job or are economically dense.
    1
  3819.  @panzer5037  Attention Attention all feel-good, no-real-job, boondoggle seekers: wealthy countries are cleaner countries. Focus your attention on growing india's GDP, not imposing more hardships on already poor people. (Echch! You make me sick! )
    1
  3820.  @thokim84  What do you mean by that anti-freedom cr*p? What "support" are they getting, and where is it coming from?
    1
  3821.  @jermainec2462  That makes no sense at all. You have poor critical thinking skills.
    1
  3822.  @Sajuuk  Better yet, why don't "we" throw some of YOUR money at this rich-kid feel-good boondoggle?
    1
  3823.  @YoureSoCreezy  You don't have to wait, just send this guy a check. He's happy to take money from fools.
    1
  3824.  @_Wai_Wai_  Pfffft... If you want religion, please go to church, synagogue, temple, mosque. Keep it out of politics.
    1
  3825. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  3826. Min 6:00 No, am not with you 100% on this. Yes, the Ukrainian pilots speak English, but do they speak F16 English? No, they speak SUxx English, but that's not the same. They have to go to ground school like everybody else.
    1
  3827. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"?
    1
  3828. Putin staged a Moscow bombing to galvanize war on Chechnia. 600 killed.
    1
  3829. What is "de-population"?
    1
  3830.  @jpm1544  Something wrong with that?
    1
  3831.  @blafonovision4342  He's worse than that. When it comes to everyday life of the middle class, Peter is an out-of-touch academic elitist. ... He spends too much time in mountains ("head in the clouds") and hotels with room service. He should at least Airbnb on his speaking gigs.
    1
  3832.  @blafonovision4342  Being from ANYWHERE doesn't mean you don't have your head in the clouds. He's a let-them-eat-cake elitist on a lot of issues (inflation, renewable energy, "populism"), and he's probably reviled for that back in Iowa.
    1
  3833.  @blafonovision4342  I doubt it. Iowa is a bright red state.
    1
  3834.  @Skunk106  No. He's a let-them-eat-cake elitist on a lot of issues (inflation, renewable energy, "populism").
    1
  3835.  @Skunk106  My guess is you don't have a real job. (And neither does Peter -- he can live in his prima-donna academic/elitist world.)
    1
  3836.  @Skunk106  Then what was that "crayons" remark all about?
    1
  3837. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3838.  @InservioLetum  ? People like Henry Ford and Thomas Edison didn't produce great wealth for the middle class? And then they themselves became rich?
    1
  3839. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  3840. This glib twerp should get a real job.
    1
  3841.  @suddendilemma5137  I am a customer consuming a product. I'm not apologizing for complaining about a degraded experience due to a thick accent.
    1
  3842.  @suddendilemma5137  Are you a frustrated sleaze-lawyer?
    1
  3843.  @802Garage  I don't have to apologize for complaining about a thick accent that degrades the experience. There's a lot of "that" on youtube and I'm tired of it. Would you complain if he DID lose the accent and made his vids easier to listen to?
    1
  3844. Democrats suck.
    1
  3845. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  3846. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  3847.  @evsal8087  Paper money = cheating banker's money.
    1
  3848.  @evsal8087  Did you get an inflation ass-kissing degree in "economics"?
    1
  3849. This s question without an answer.
    1
  3850. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  3851. This is a bad place to get American news. Just watch Fox, Glenn Beck. Shapiro, Mark Dice, Styxhexenhammer, Dinesh D'Souza, Next News Network, Bill Whittle, Matt Walsh....
    1
  3852. Horsesh*t. TBC
    1
  3853. The Beltway lies right at you.
    1
  3854. @beatonthedonis4726 So what? To repeat: Scott Kilmer says not to buy a car made in Mexico. By YOUR logic, the consumer has no say in the matter.
    1
  3855. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3856. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  3857. Yeah, I bet that went down in flames. Must have been like promoting nuclear power to these idiots.
    1
  3858. There already is a pipeline. It's called a railroad.
    1
  3859. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  3860. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  3861. Pathetic.
    1
  3862. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3863. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  3864. Cheap? With all that labor-intensive handling? Chalk up a big one for dis-ingenuousness.
    1
  3865.  @tomcraver9659  Yes, but it's "sustainable".
    1
  3866.  @tragan1442  If you can substantiate that, please do. Otherwise spare us the victimology cr*p, unless you're talking about the Federal Reserve.
    1
  3867. Interesting, but with PZ's characteristically elitist condescension for Donald Trump.
    1
  3868. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  3869. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3870. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  3871. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3872. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3873. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  3874.  @helenan.i.kristiansen1635  Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  3875. Has he done one on data fraud from the witch doctors of climate quackery? Like the IPCC?
    1
  3876.  @woodjohnn  Abolish government funding and tenure.
    1
  3877.  @anthonykeller5120  Phew... There's a lot to unpack here.
    1
  3878. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  3879. @theendoftheline  Get a real job.
    1
  3880. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  3881. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  3882.  @malectric  Good for New Zealand. Evidently it has cost-effective geo sites, like Iceland. But I have my doubts because New Zealand is a stupid-Liberal country and they've probably distorted their energy markets with "green" feel-goodery. (That last PM was a real Femo-Fascist POS.)
    1
  3883.  @malectric  I'm not impressed with your self-important, un-asked-for sense of cerebral superiority (typical of this issue). "This isn't political?" You're a crappy citizen.
    1
  3884.  @malectric  Yes it does. It's mostly a looking-for-a-handout boondoggle.
    1
  3885. Is he on that stupid non-GMO bandwagon?
    1
  3886. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3887. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  3888. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  3889.  @suehowie152  Appalachians get big floods like this regularly. Ashville itself good a flood like this in 1916. You ignore history. Hurricane Agnes. Hurricane Eloise. Flood of '27. Floods happen Big Time in Appalachia.
    1
  3890. "Conservation and efficiency"... sounds like something your typical PBS Liberal can relate to. "Just tighten your belts, you groveling peasants."
    1
  3891.  @alexsandrarokas7117  I think you misinterpret my post.
    1
  3892. Evidently it's a cult/religion. They may be pathetic, but necessary nevertheless.
    1
  3893. Is this a form of click bait????
    1
  3894. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  3895. Trump won. The 2020 election was stolen. Arizona, Wisconsin partial audits conclusion: DECERTIFY. Jan 6th <--- FBI, Nancy Pelosi, DC setup. Re: Ray Epps. Jan 6th arrestees <--- political prisoners. Jan 6th hearings <--- Stalinist show trial and a load of crap.
    1
  3896.  @keylanoslokj1806  Real Americans won't forget the political equivalent of rape.
    1
  3897. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    1
  3898. Too much sing-song in the voice.
    1
  3899. Sounds like a hell hole. No wonder people couldn't wait to get to America.
    1
  3900.  @SusCalvin  So I suppose America with its 1st Amendment looks pretty good compared to degradation most people have to live with?
    1
  3901.  @SusCalvin  European history sucks.
    1
  3902.  @tex8939  "Refresher course"
    1
  3903.  @tex8939  What not to do.
    1
  3904. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3905. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  3906. Is this a performance in mediocrity or is it just me?
    1
  3907. Stupid boondoggle based on superstition.
    1
  3908. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  3909. In other words, we can give ourselves a "cancer vaccination" by exposing ourselves to high radiation?
    1
  3910. Well done. Stimulates interest in the industry.
    1
  3911. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  3912. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  3913. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  3914. Too jumped up, caffeineated, and hustling.
    1
  3915. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  3916. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  3917. Can you elaborate?
    1
  3918. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  3919. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  3920. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  3921. Right. And she shouldn't call an elected president a "dictator".
    1
  3922. @user-kf1pf5qw4d Don't make the perfect the enemy of the good.
    1
  3923. @user-kf1pf5qw4d Are you the product of never having a real job?
    1
  3924. @user-kf1pf5qw4d Don't stand in the way of other people solving theirs.
    1
  3925. @user-kf1pf5qw4d Someone with a facebook account has a real job? 😆😆😆
    1
  3926. @user-kf1pf5qw4d You have the intellect of a facebook id-user too.
    1
  3927. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3928. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  3929.  @streuthmonkey1  Absolutely. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then? "Climate Change" is a $trillion industry/boondoggle based on fraud.
    1
  3930.  @AnnaSchoneveld  Absolutely. "Climate Change" is a $trillion industry/boondoggle based on fraud.
    1
  3931. Please try to get control of the hand gesticulations.
    1
  3932. Too many interruptions. Makes it look like vlogger has to "hog" the spotlight. Please just run the tape and save the commentary for afterward.
    1
  3933. Phew.
    1
  3934. What is "p-hacking"?
    1
  3935.  @JacksonBockus  What is a "low p value" [Audience! If I knew what a "P value" was, I wouldn't be asking the question.]
    1
  3936.  @JacksonBockus  Sorry, it's a serial frustration -- technical people talking techno-geek to a lay question. ... Is the "P value" of getting Heads on a coin toss 0.5?
    1
  3937. Bravo!
    1
  3938. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  3939. South Africa made its own gasoline for decades from coal (Sasol). This EV stuff is stupid. I wish Porshe well, but the manufacturing of gasoline has already been mastered and proven by Sasol. Maybe Porsche wants to appease the global-warming tree-huggers with "carbon neutrality". That's stupid too.
    1
  3940. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  3941. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3942. Happy family - so good to see. Makes you want to say "it doesn't get any better..."
    1
  3943. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  3944. Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .
    1
  3945. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3946. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  3947. I thought the sugar leftovers were called "bagasse" and was burned as fuel in the sugar refinery.
    1
  3948. Wrong about Trump running on all-charisma/no-policy. He had both. For policy is was Wall, Deregulation, conservative Scotus, make snooty-Europe pay its NATO bills, ....
    1
  3949. There was a mountain of voter-fraud evidence. Bill Maher should be called a "fraud denier".
    1
  3950.  @kevinbillingsley8256  B--- S---. Both partial audits turned up enough fraud to decertify. Add you to the Fraud Deniers.
    1
  3951. America has such a corrupt medical school system. We could be the world's biggest exporters of doctors -- "Japan on steroids".
    1
  3952. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  3953. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  3954. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  3955. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  3956. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  3957. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  3958. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  3959. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  3960. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  3961. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  3962. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  3963. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    1
  3964. How about China's Himalayan dams on upstream Indian rivers?
    1
  3965. Yes -- great stuff. I'm following it over in Electric Viking (thick accent). Great stuff -- wrong reasons: CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  3966. ​ @UndecidedMF  Very good. Many of us have learned to be skeptical of the latest "game changer" (maybe somebody hustling for grant money). But Sakuu is getting a following.
    1
  3967. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  3968. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  3969. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  3970. Operation Gang Rape
    1
  3971. Long LIV golf!
    1
  3972. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  3973. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  3974. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  3975. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  3976. Impeach on 1) Hunter/brother corruption 2) refusal to enforce immigration law.
    1
  3977. Doesn't this show what a stupid boondoggle solar energy is? Putting them on your roof is one thing, but taking up useful land with something that can be produced at a fraction of the "footprint" is plain stupid. BTW: There Is No Global Warming. Here is John Robson, Climate Discussion Network, talking about the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg
    1
  3978.  @Big_If_True  Is that plant - as in vegetable? "Vegetable" is my estimation of the intelligence of the climate-quack koolaid drinkers. There Is No Warming. (See the latest IPCC report, "troposphere satellite data" if you want to sound smart.)
    1
  3979.  @boathemian7694  "Oh yes... Just like the Texas Windmill Fiasco".
    1
  3980.  @TheWineroute  Is your comment pro-or anti-Climate Quackery? We've had mass climate stupidity since the 70s, starting with that stupid Ozone Depletion: Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p! The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam https://youtu.be/9Szs-treHwQ The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion https://www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: https://youtu.be/lBu3vltczRw In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). https://youtu.be/uVeTJSIbGm8 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. https://youtu.be/Ll_TR7C4xr4 The Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: https://youtu.be/taTzqRHNIEc A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: https://api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 7:50 "In the old days, capacitors used to last 10-20 years" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGEduZ3EVcg 7) Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. https://youtu.be/AU0eNa4GrgU How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. https://youtu.be/wm56tV5BbJk Lousy car air conditioning: https://youtu.be/5jKRiDtcBrs Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant https://youtu.be/pv_fxOuLuZU Propane as a refregerant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXyHOfx307k . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia https://www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right) https://youtu.be/kmfAM8kQrjU The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?) Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry. You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyGoqC9FTFc https://youtu.be/krqHVzF3-T8 Min 21:00: A brief history of refrigerants R12, R22, R410a and the screwing we get from the EPA, the "Montreal Protocol" (a self-appointed bureaucracy still alive and well) over their ozone depletion quackery. The doubling of pressures from R12 to R22, and the DOUBLING AGAIN from R22 to R 410a, AND R22 wasn't even banned for ozone depletion! (100x less "odp" from R12). It was banned for "global warming" quackery. https://youtu.be/V_wUZ4qmAnk Min 36:00 Can be charged up to $30 a pound to destroy "contaminated" R22: https://youtu.be/V_wUZ4qmAnk Min 7:00 "pre-EPA refrigerants operated at low pressure and only soldered (not brazed) pipe joints. https://youtu.be/G0XOLDHGBmU Min 18:00 all refrigerants turn into acid when in contact with water (! ! !): https://youtu.be/kmfAM8kQrjU Refrigerants decompose in water ! ! ! https://www.answers.com/Q/What_happens_when_refrigerant_hydrolyzes_with_water What is hydrolysis? https://youtu.be/G_mT9JI_jxE What about the ozone hole and R-12 refrigerants? https://creationtoday.org/what-about-the-ozone-hole-and-r-12-refrigerants/ Also forgotten is a long list of truly ridiculous claims, such as the one from Al Gore's 1992 book "Earth in the Balance"that, thanks to the Antarctic ozone hole, "hunters now report finding blind rabbits; fisherman catch blind salmon." https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/ozone-the-hole-truth Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so why sre they a problem in the stratosphere? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE 15% of chlorine in stratosphere is natural, according to this: https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/1998/faq3.html Another comment I submit to The Order is about "NOISE", namely, - NOISE is a bad thing -- we don't want that in our houses. - Don't compressors that are forced to operate at higher pressures make more NOISE than compressors that operate at much lower pressures? - Assuming the answer to the above is "yes", then would a compressor that has to operate at 450 psi (for that stupid R-410A refrigerant -- 'scuse my french) vs. 150 psi for R-12 (the industry standard till that stupid EPA came along -- 'scuse my french again). - Here is a PT graph for the major refrigerants: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/refrigerant-temperature-pressure-chart-d_1683.html - Conclusion: the stupid EPA and DOE have not only made AC equipment more expensive to buy and more expensive to maintain and less effective in terms of cooling (window ACs) -- they have also made them NOISIER. ... Thank you, tax-paid idiots of environmentalism and quackery that is "ozone depletion" (the warmup act for "global warming" -- "Hey Texas -- how's that renewable energy/global warming/windmill thing working out????") Thank you Boomer generation (mine) for the 60s mess you have made of America. Cheers. PS: here's a video about a stupid 90% furnace whose condensation overflowed the week before Christmas and trashed multiple ceilings in the guy's house. Of course, those stupid DOE bureaucrats will be there bright and early to fix the damage. "Happy Holidays!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnVtRqfqoSY&ab_channel=AntiDIYHVAC ... And another video about a screw-up with the INDUCER fan --> a creature of "high efficiency" DOE regulations which dictate the squeezing all so much heat out the combustion, a separate fan needed to get the exhaust gasses out the flu. Then they break down and screw up the whole system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZJ1GPAATGY&t=370s&ab_channel=VintageVideos2009 90% furnaces: "Required". Required by whom? Are these ultra-complicated and expensive machines cost effective over their total life???? Or is this another expensive, pointless dictate from bureaucratic petty tyrants making life more difficult for everyone? (All I hear about these are those paper-thin heat exchangers rusting through, fans not working, cramped working conditions, more problems with water condensate damage and EXPENSIVE EXPENSIVE EXPENSIVE REPAIRS!!!) PS: am big fan of your channel, but have total disgust for the hideous things government has done to this industry. ** What is ppm concentration of ozone in the stratosphere? Answer: The peak concentration of ozone occurs at an altitude of roughly 32 kilometers (20 miles) above the surface of the Earth. At that altitude, ozone concentration can be as high as 15 parts per million (0.0015 percent). https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/SH.html How can a 0.0015% concentration of anything protect us from anything? I.e. ozone is another trivial trace gas like CO2. Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ ..
    1
  3981.  @extropiantranshuman  Tell all that crap to people getting - priced out of electricity, - freezing in winter, - sweltering in summer, - getting run over riding their stupid bikes - getting priced out of the car market - -
    1
  3982.  @enderwiggin1113  How is there going to be any reduction of co2 if people aren't forced back into pulling rickshaws?
    1
  3983.  @enderwiggin1113  1) the NET carbon reduction of those are trivial and irrelevant.
    1
  3984.  @enderwiggin1113  This is all a religious feel-good ritual for eco-pagans. You have to MAKE THE BASTARDS PULL RICKSHAWS!.
    1
  3985.  @enderwiggin1113  1) I have a real job, "I work for a living". 2) See the CDN Climate Discussion Nexus channel for a non-bought-off, non-Koolaid analysis of climate alarmist crap.
    1
  3986.  @enderwiggin1113  Your climate-alarmist Koolaid-crap inebriation prevents you from critical thinking.
    1
  3987.  @enderwiggin1113  That's because you're not an intellectual, you're a parochial/religious parishioner.
    1
  3988.  @enderwiggin1113  Negative. Your head has been hijacked by religious dogma, which makes you incapable of critical thinking. You belong to the cult/religion of climate alarmism.
    1
  3989. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  3990. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  3991. Is this a form of click bait????
    1
  3992. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  3993. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  3994. Does he recommend the Kirk Sorenson videos? That's where the credit belongs for "re-discovering" Thormium.
    1
  3995. Good! You solar geeks DON'T DESERVE to have your solar subsidized by the grid users!
    1
  3996. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  3997.  @hououinkyouma1458  It doesn't look like a joke to me.
    1
  3998. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  3999.  @soldiersvejk2053  If you want gestapo, check out the CCP. (Just ask the Falun Gong.)
    1
  4000. Bug off.
    1
  4001. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4002. "Producer Law"
    1
  4003. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4004. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4005. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  4006. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  4007. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    1
  4008.  @patrickvanraes2092  It's a stupid boondoggle. Please see my other posts.
    1
  4009.  @patrickvanraes2092  1) You agree that fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  4010.  @patrickvanraes2092  Quick response: You are somebody WHO HAS NEVER HAD A REAL JOB. ... And I'll prove that charge by demanding they YOU tell us what a REAL JOB is. Go ahead... I DARE YOU!
    1
  4011.  @aaronbaker2186  1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  4012.  @patrickvanraes2092  Teacher? Heep-big reeesearch scientist? That's your idea of a real job from the inside of your self-serving echo chamber?
    1
  4013.  @patrickvanraes2092  You failed the test. You are inebriated in your stuck-up, conceited, elitest economic ignorance. Comparing yourself to Einstein and Bohr -- nauseating. A typical privileged prima donna. ... But you're welcome to take the test over. Conservatives give exam retakes if you failed the first time.
    1
  4014.  @patrickvanraes2092  I'm talking about your self-serving conceit that comes from your never having had a real job.
    1
  4015.  @patrickvanraes2092  ^^ talented at denial and issue-changing double talk. Still failing the "real job" test and continues being a self-serving fusion boondoggle apologist.
    1
  4016.  @VoteForBukele  You have been "had" by the quacks and charlatans of fusion power. Go ahead... drink the Koolaid -- just leave the rest of us out of it when it comes to paying the salaries and retirement of these quacks.
    1
  4017. Playlist for Kirk Sorenson, thorium-fission. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  4018.  @VoteForBukele  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLk46BZfEMs&list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J&index=37
    1
  4019. Crowd size: I heard people were given free tickets and chartered buses to go.
    1
  4020. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4021. How about the institution changed with managing/moderating community social relations? Let's see... what was that called?
    1
  4022. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4023. It was a bicycle accident, right? (That hallmark of Dutch quackery and virtue signaling.) Bikes suck!!!!
    1
  4024.  @henryburton6529  ? "... eff your 'British reserve' ".
    1
  4025.  @henryburton6529  IDC.
    1
  4026.  @patrickm6012  Yes.
    1
  4027.  @olivergalt  If it's not self evident, then YOU are the one with the perception problem. Chances are you don't have a real job (which I Peter's problem too).
    1
  4028.  @olivergalt  Then you should know better.
    1
  4029.  @olivergalt  More like Louis XIV.
    1
  4030. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4031. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    1
  4032. A little less drama in the presentation, thanks.
    1
  4033.  @ReventureConsulting  👌 You have good content, it's just the visuals and the audio that's holding it back. Advise a little smoother all the way around.
    1
  4034. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,
    1
  4035.  @TheStockwell  Lady friend went to college in London and had 4 attempted rapes. Spare me your patronizing self-righteousness.
    1
  4036.  @Backpacker8381  "complicit?" Horse sh-t.
    1
  4037. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4038. Fipina Pea is Philippines ambassador to the world.
    1
  4039. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  4040. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  4041. "Hey America, how's the Femo-Fascism working out?"
    1
  4042. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4043. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 ..
    1
  4044. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4045. Too much accent. Please provide a version where MS Word reads the text.
    1
  4046. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  4047. 👍👍👍
    1
  4048. Can someone please explain: - the medieval warm period? - the Roman warm period? - the Egyptian warm period?
    1
  4049. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  4050. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4051. @squibbelsmcjohnson And what are the lazy slobs of Liberalism giving to the world?
    1
  4052. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4053. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4054. But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  4055.  @Zephyr5702  But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  4056. Bullshit! El Salvador has a Donald Trump for a President. Bravo!
    1
  4057. Charles Manson, anyone?
    1
  4058. How can Ukraine defend itself against the 3000-pound glide bombs?How can Ukraine defend itself against the 3000-pound glide bombs?
    1
  4059.  @_John_P  They are dropping the bombs from 60 kilometers out. Evidently Ukraine doesn't have any weapons that can get the planes before they drop the glide bombs.
    1
  4060. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  4061. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  4062. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  4063. Are you telling the whole story on the PCV valve? Where do the gases go?
    1
  4064.  @daleinaz1  t.y. Are catalytic converters BS or is it just me?
    1
  4065.  @daleinaz1  I'm not a chemist, but considering the quackery we've been fed about "global warming" and "ozone depletion", these busy-body-bureaucrats have to be kept an eye. That said, as I understand it, the BIGGEST problem with auto exhaust is Nitrogen compounds that degenerate into ozone, which is what stings the eyes. The nitrogen problem was solved with fuel injection and EGR (exhaust gas return), which "starved" some oxygen out of the mix to reduce the NOx's. On the other hand, catalytic converters are for just what you say -- burning up any unburned HCs/HydorCarbons (I don't know/don't care about CO). But unburned HCs aren't The Biggest problem with pollution, and are mostly fixed by "good tuning", which fuel injection does now automatically (as opposed to the pre-fuel-injection days when catalytic converters were made law). I think catalytic converters are a screwing of the car-buying public.
    1
  4066.  @daleinaz1  I heard NOx degraded to ozone, but whatever. We agree that the biggest problem is NOx, and that's taken care of by EGR. So who G.A.S. about HCs? They look like a stupid holdover from "natural aspiration". But those sh*t bureaucrats won't let go of it.
    1
  4067. Bad interview.
    1
  4068. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  4069. Well done. Thanks for making. This is the "poster child" videos for overly complex cars. A "bleeping" SERVO MOTOR to change the vents from defrost to face? What happened to simple WIRES AND LEVERS? I'd be happy with those!!!! I DON'T WANT A SERVO MOTOR TO CHANGE MY VENTS!!!
    1
  4070. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4071. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  4072. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  4073. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  4074. Ok. It's the cash value of the offer. Obama doesn't understand America, so how can he love it? But the cash value of the offer should be worth it to President Trump.
    1
  4075. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  4076.  @phredw1245  How do you figure "government subsidizes fossil fuels"?
    1
  4077. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  4078. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4079. Min 9:07 "No" -- it SHOULD be called a "Dark Fleet" because they "spoof" their their GPS locations and outright turn off their transponders. I.e., they are HIDING from the sanctions regime. China Uncensored channel has a story on this. It's causing big problems and risks throughout the shipping world.
    1
  4080. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  4081. Is this a performance in mediocrity or is it just me?
    1
  4082. Go MTG!
    1
  4083. Another condescending insult from Deep State globalist operative and shill.
    1
  4084. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  4085. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4086.  @PeterPete  Yes. You speak for yourself! My pursuit of happiness is none of your business. And a stupid comment like that shows a spoiled child's idiot understanding of standard of living, and world poverty, by extension. I take you don't have a real job -- that's the kind of thing spoiled people say.
    1
  4087.  @augusto_lisboa  Pathetic. Please spend a couple hours researching Thorium (Kirk Sorenson). You'll see how stupid this energy penny-pinching is.
    1
  4088.  @edide1627  A little? A you aware of the extent of quackery and superstition surrounding: - "global warming" - "ozone depletion" - GMO foods - "organic foods" ???
    1
  4089.  @edide1627  ?
    1
  4090. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4091. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus. 267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering.
    1
  4092. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  4093. Too much accent. Could you make a duplicate where a machine reads the text (PDF or MS Word) Thanks.
    1
  4094. Europe has a bad case of Femo-Fascism.
    1
  4095.  @gandydancer9710  It is constructive criticism to increase the number of viewers. I assume the video is "monetized" so an increase viewership means more money for them. "American English" is described as having a "neutral accent" (Brits seems to agree on this.) Conclusion: for the best possible experience for the widest possible audience, use a neutral accent.
    1
  4096. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4097. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  4098. Faith Goldy.
    1
  4099. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4100. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  4101. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4102. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  4103.  @tim211292  I take it you don't have a real job.
    1
  4104.  @michigandersea3485  What is the average cost/kWh in P?
    1
  4105.  @jantschierschky3461  Here's one on the stupid climate-hustling hype from Britain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qcnyq4Yo4U
    1
  4106. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4107. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4108. Please get a professional narrator or machine-read the text.
    1
  4109. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  4110. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4111.  @jockoharpo2622  One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen! Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians know a lot about brush fires and they're always nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4112. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  4113. This is crap: "Remember Donald Trump most Pro narcotic most pro-illegal migration uh president of the United States has ever had..." ^^ It shows that for all Peter's brilliance, he's never-had-much-of-a-real-job condescending twit.
    1
  4114.  @hermaeusmora2945  I know. You're misinterpreting my comment.
    1
  4115. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  4116. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  4117. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4118. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  4119. Hey PZ -- given your usual condescension for Donald Trump, any thoughts on Space Force?
    1
  4120. Hello Styx, I call it Femo-Fascism -- objective truth is irrelevant; it's ALL ABOUT THE FEELINGS. (As Chris Rock and that stupid AOC explain.) Chris Rock - Only woman children and dogs are loved unconditionally! - YouTube Chris Rock - Only woman children and dogs are loved unconditionally! AOC: Derek Chauvin Guilty Verdict Isn’t Justice - YouTube AOC: Derek Chauvin Guilty Verdict Isn’t Justice
    1
  4121. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  4122. Want to do this for a living?
    1
  4123. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  4124. Such a load of it.
    1
  4125. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  4126. In other words, it used to be warm. Did they have SUVs back then?
    1
  4127.  @AnnaSchoneveld  Absolutely! I think the climate-change hustlers want the Medieval Warm Period "airbrushed" out of the records -- Stalin style.
    1
  4128. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  4129. Disagree. Just put the substations behind something bulletproof.
    1
  4130. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  4131. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4132. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    1
  4133. This is a stupid piece with a stupid point of view.
    1
  4134. Can't take the con-artist tone of voice.
    1
  4135. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  4136. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4137. What's NFA?
    1
  4138. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  4139. Yes, I was thinking the same thing -- only works where there's a daily swing from hot to cold, as in the desert. ("Remember, we're dealing with Californians here -- which has its provincialisms."
    1
  4140. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  4141. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4142. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  4143. Where in Russia is this located?
    1
  4144. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  4145. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  4146. Normalize China's military presence? What a euphemism! Asian NATO now!
    1
  4147. There are "non-Tenet Media" people who are anti-Ukraine-involvement. Tucker Carlson, for one. I say we need people to "take the other side", just to be devil's advocate.
    1
  4148. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4149. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4150. Very funny.
    1
  4151. Awesome! Awesome! Awesome!
    1
  4152. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4153. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  4154. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4155. They should give the good-journalism 5-questions first. Who, what, where, when, etc. Don't make the viewer have listen through lower level details to find that out.
    1
  4156. Makes sense. Some think that Elvis was Melungeon descended.
    1
  4157. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  4158. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4159. Trump won. The 2020 election was stolen. Arizona, Wisconsin partial audits conclusion: DECERTIFY. Jan 6th <--- FBI, Nancy Pelosi, DC setup. Re: Ray Epps. Jan 6th arrestees <--- political prisoners. Jan 6th hearings <--- Stalinist show trial and a load of crap. Real Americans won't forget Mark Zuckerberg's political equivalent of rape.
    1
  4160. Burning the Riechstag.
    1
  4161. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  4162. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  4163. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4164. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  4165. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4166. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  4167. Don't like the hustler voice. Don't like the filibuster boilerplate narrative. "Please get to the point without the manipulative song and dance."
    1
  4168. It was a bicycle accident, right? (That hallmark of Dutch quackery and virtue signaling.) Bikes suck!!!!
    1
  4169. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4170. Well done. "You are a one-man PBS channel." :)
    1
  4171. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  4172. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE Carbon quackery https://youtu.be/TjlmFr4FMvI IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% if scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAw Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 ..
    1
  4173. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4174. Is anyone besides me getting tired of the British accents?
    1
  4175. "Go for it, Xi Jinping"
    1
  4176. Put the entire aircraft training curriculum online on YouTube videos. (I've taught myself most of HVAC repair on YouTube and have never touched a "set of guages"; but am ready to go when it comes time for hands-on.)
    1
  4177. It must be the "glamour factor" that allows this.
    1
  4178.  @Shredxcam22  Understood. Reality vs.perception: re: what goes on in a teenager's mind when making a career decision.
    1
  4179.  @Shredxcam22  Understood. I'm just saying put it on steroids and formalize it, i.e., learn the videos frontward and backward, pass a serious test, cut your on-site training time by... 50% (?)
    1
  4180. What is this? Sorry, but this sounds like cliched cr*p.
    1
  4181. Spare us the bucolic utopia of life on $2 million dollars worth of ranch land.
    1
  4182.  Cass Cass  Spare us the bucolic utopia of life on $2 million dollars worth of ranch land.
    1
  4183. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4184. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4185.  @kakistocracyusa  Absolutely. All temperature readings from urban/suburban areas should be excluded.
    1
  4186. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them
    1
  4187. Is this a performance in mediocrity or is it just me?
    1
  4188. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  4189. 👍👍🎉🎉👍👍
    1
  4190. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  4191. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  4192. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4193. That stupid New York Times has been a bunch of low-life bottom feeders for decades.
    1
  4194. @beerye3  How do you think this pointless self-indulgent crap sounds to someone who has to stand by a cash register 10 hours a day just to make rent?
    1
  4195.  @thomasmoss1066  He's out-to-lunch with his hippie-cool green energy feel-goodery.
    1
  4196. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  4197. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  4198. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  4199. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  4200. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al). Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990). "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion". Global warming is 21st century superstition. Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job. Just burn coal.
    1
  4201. @glen.simpson  Get a real job.
    1
  4202.  @Meton2526  The problem is the West is distracted with this stupid renewable energy cr*p and doesn't not have a competitive economic attitude or spirit. (And only 35% of NYC public school graduates can do math at grade level. The Chinese know this and laugh.)
    1
  4203.  @Meton2526  Have you watched the long Kirk Sorenson video on Thorium, PWRs (Pressurized Water Reactors) vs. molten salt, etc. ? ("burning dirt" vs. "burning platinum"?)
    1
  4204.  @Meton2526  As of June 2023, the price of low-enriched uranium (LEU) was $2,700 per kilogram, A 1-gigawatt nuclear power plant can require around 27 tonnes of uranium fuel each year, 27 tonnes x 1000 kg/tonne x $2700/kg LEU = 72.9 million U.S. dollars
    1
  4205.  @Meton2526  How about NATURAL uranium at ~$50 a pound?
    1
  4206.  @Meton2526  Kirk Sorenson talks a lot about the simpler/cheaper machinery needed in a molten salt reactor -- no high pressure water, no water at all, not much of a containment vessel.
    1
  4207. A professional narrator or machine reading would help. It starts to sound like the pre-flight instructions on an airline.
    1
  4208. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4209. Bless you, Mr. President.
    1
  4210. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4211. He was lucky for 1880 -- could have been a lot worse.
    1
  4212. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  4213. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4214. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4215. If we could calculatorize Thorium ( proven in the 60s; see Kirk Sorenson videos) ... we could have unlimited gasoline and electricity, making this renewable stuff worthless.
    1
  4216. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  4217. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4218. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  4219. ???? After a while, this becomes a Who-Cares? video.
    1
  4220.  @woodypigeon  ... We're at the top of an INTERglacial period. Earth spends most of its time freezing its b---- off, and I don't know what he's yammering about.
    1
  4221.  @woodypigeon  Medieval warm period? Roman warm period? "Ice Man of the Alps" warm period? Little Ice Age? I don't know what the guy's talking about. I don't think that methane cr*p...whatever it is... will have any effect on the Malkenkovich cycle, which puts the earth in 90,000 years of freezing its b---- off. And it if did, that would be a GOOD THING. Get a life.
    1
  4222. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  4223. "Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights. Therefore there are only two kind of laws: Type 1) those that protect property rights, Type 2) and those that attack property rights <--- where Femo-Fascism lives "Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property." (We can eliminate 90% of the cr*p we call politics with first principles of Liberty.)
    1
  4224. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  4225. What island did you go to?
    1
  4226. Go Kayleigh!
    1
  4227. They're NOT saying the WHY. (!) Where in this video do they say WHY this is happening?
    1
  4228. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  4229. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  4230. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  4231. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4232. Jordan Peterson is still an ivory-tower academic who has never had a profit-and-loss real job. He therefore does not understand unaffordability of another RINO like Mike Pence. Same for Mike Pence -- he's a lifelong LAWYER and politician. He's never had a real job. That's why everything he says sounds like scripted boilerplate.
    1
  4233. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  4234. 1) Free up truck drivers with self-driving trucks. 2) Free up the petroleum industry with thorium power. 3) Free up the glucose farmers with synthetic glucose production.
    1
  4235.  @MikeYurbasovich  "The longest journey..."
    1
  4236.  @soilomasbello1156  Yes - it's 21st century SUPERSTITION. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Quackery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  4237.  @boriskaragiannis.7735  Post a link?
    1
  4238.  @ShowersWithAshleyBiden  He's a stupid -ss. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain
    1
  4239. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  4240. Well done.
    1
  4241. Does anyone see how STUPID this is compared to thorium molten salt reactors? See the Kirk Sorenson videos. The Taxpayers deserve a refund for this 50 years of fusion boondoggle.
    1
  4242.  @michellecullen8911  See the Kirk Sorenson videos. (We could have had molten salt reactors 40 years ago. You won't believe why we don't.)
    1
  4243.  @michellecullen8911  Speaking of military uses, there's enough energy in Thorium to synthesize petroleum. Read: no more petroleum resource wars like World War 2. ... and here we are goofing off over those stupid solar panels.
    1
  4244.  @Illiteratechimp  Want to buy a bridge?
    1
  4245.  @Illiteratechimp  #1 Pacific Theater: 1941 US tells Japan to get out of Indonesia. Cut off their oil supply. Result: Japan attacks all over East Asia. #2 You have a profound ignorance of the role of gold... in any context, economic or historical. Suggestion: watch The Money Masters here on YouTube. #3 Watch the Kirk Sorenson videos about Thorium Molten Salt Reactors, and the Navy's interest in them to make synthetic bunker fuel.
    1
  4246.  @Illiteratechimp  "Don't quit your day job."
    1
  4247.  @Illiteratechimp  Very funny. Please study gold in relation to inflation and banking cartels, and "income inequality". I recommend The Money Masters.
    1
  4248.  @Illiteratechimp  Please go into selling vegamatics on late-night TV. You're a natural for it.
    1
  4249.  @Illiteratechimp  Good for you. You profited from the rape of the middle class. Congratulations. Your ill-gotten gains should restored to the people whose purchasing power was stolen.
    1
  4250.  @Slider68  You've watched too many of those stupid fluff pieces from PBS. Also, you don't recognize a BOONDOGGLE when you see one.
    1
  4251.  @Slider68  "Fusion is always 30 years away." It's a perpetual $multi-billion tax funded boondoggle for grant-seeking academics. It's so stupidly unfeasible and impractical as to by one step shy of the perpetual motion machine. Stupid politicians fall for it like they fall for global warming and "ozone depletion". 1) there IS no global warming 2) co2 won't cause any 3) if you didn't have greenhouse gases (e.g. water) you'd burn in the sun and freeze in the shade. (Spend a night in the desert without a sleeping bag.)
    1
  4252.  @neilbarnett3046  Given the Thorium alternative (available since the 60s), fusion is stupid effort and a boondoggle creation of ignorant media and politics. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  4253.  @rielyjohnson5748  Sounds like you're nominating yourself for a Nobel prize; like the hockey-stick people of climate quackery.
    1
  4254.  @larrysingleton2864  👍👍👍 The eco-fascists are imposing human sacrifices like the Aztec skull bashers or Indian cow worshipers.
    1
  4255.  @reignmkr64  In other words, you don't know a rank boondoggle when you see one.
    1
  4256.  @markhansford1489  Please spend a couple hours on the Kirk Sorenson/Thorium videos. You'll understand soon enough what foolishness both fusion and "renewables" are. ... Thorium is to energy what agriculture is to hunter-gathering.
    1
  4257.  @jasonborne5724  Please spend a couple hours on Kirk Sorenson's videos about Thorium Molten Salt Reactors. It will make "renewables" and even petroleum look stupid.
    1
  4258. Fusion is a stupid boondoggle. Study the Thorium videos of Kirk Sorenson.
    1
  4259.  @anarchisttechsupport6644  Please check out the Kirk Sorenson videos in Thorium Molten Salt Reactors. Fusion is sheer boondoggle foolishness, decades of it.
    1
  4260. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4261. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  4262. What about China's wink and a nod to Putin about the invasion at the olympics?
    1
  4263.  @wandeling127  Japan blew up its economy with debt (past tense). China IS blowing up its economy with debt.
    1
  4264. What was Ryan's conclusion? Is Trump's strategy good or bad?
    1
  4265. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4266. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4267. Distracting accent. Some British accents sound like they've got marbles in their mouth. "Cohw" for coal.
    1
  4268. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  4269. What happens when Texas goes Blue, like California? It'll happen in a few years, sat Red Elephant.
    1
  4270. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  4271. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4272.  @jonb7470  The only thing that will please these professional obstructionists is to DO NOTHING. Meanwhile, $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  4273. @kaelhooten8468 $60 billion dollars worth of copper is a gift to the world, and and these schmoes have no right to stand in the way of it.
    1
  4274. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4275. $60 billion of copper will benefit millions of people. Your selfishness is breathtaking and I see that the Trump administration is getting things moving here.
    1
  4276. You should ask The Company for tuition to train the locals in the skills needed to help in the mining operation.
    1
  4277. @jonb747 In other words, you're saying millions of people won't get any benefits out of a 60-billion-pound increase in the supply of copper? ^^ liability in the advancement of human progress.
    1
  4278. Too much accent.
    1
  4279. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  4280.  @jentaylor13  While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  4281. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4282. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  4283. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4284. Does anyone get sick of this guy's haughty accent? Or is it just me? (The word "haughty" is anomonopoeic.)
    1
  4285. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  4286. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  4287. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  4288. No, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  4289. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4290. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  4291. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  4292. Disgustingly ignorant and apologetic for the stealing of inflation.
    1
  4293. What about the "this was all staged" hypothesis?, i.e., it was all staged by Putin to smoke out "traitors" in his ranks. Rumor has it that Putin staged the bomb killing of 300 people to justify the "subduing" of Chechnia. (sp?).
    1
  4294. 1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  4295.  @Ebbs-ez2fs  1) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to electricity generation. 2) Fusion is an out and out FRAUD when it comes to the already developed, 1960s technology, unlimited, cost effective alternative thorium-fission. Where does that leave the BILLIONS in other people's money you so cavalierly help yourself to???? "Oh... we have to fund all these white coats because we might discover something...". <--- the arrogance is nauseating. BTW, all those cavelier white coats could be working on something that people actually want, as opposed to pissing away their labor on this stupid boondoggle.
    1
  4296. What's the point? Government meddling is good? Or Government meddling is bad? Are the Freedom House rankings wrong? Are there freer places than Hong Kong?
    1
  4297.  @numathesaint872  Your name says it all. Go get a real job for a year.
    1
  4298. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  4299. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  4300. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  4301. Yes, shouldn't he be more respectful? 20 years ago all these people had were bicycles. Now the have cars -- not motorcycles -- cars. Let's see your average American make that kind of progress in 20 years.
    1
  4302.  @fredk.2001  Everybody else can do that too, but they are the one with the get-up-and-go to improve themselves, and that's while doing it in the face of a horrible communist government.
    1
  4303. What is "de-population"?
    1
  4304. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4305. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4306. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4307. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  4308. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  4309. Civilization: rule of law. Democratic Party: rule of convenience. Watch "Tucker: Bloomberg shouldn't be on the debate stage" on YouTube https://youtu.be/cjo16hzVGt0
    1
  4310. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  4311. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4312. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  4313. Why give that a-hole Piers Morgan a platform?
    1
  4314. More broadly, the is a Right To Repair movement and organization. I support it. It probably has crowd funding accounts. Good investigative journalism. Now please do one on the Federal Reserve.
    1
  4315. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  4316. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  4317. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  4318. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4319. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4320. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  4321. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  4322.  @Kerrsartisticgifts  "Yes" Do you have any options besides complaining about it?
    1
  4323.  @Kerrsartisticgifts  ?
    1
  4324.  @socialeconomicpoliticalana1128  Yes - it's called human sacrifice and superstition.
    1
  4325. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  4326. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  4327. But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  4328.  @allanmarks2150  Use thermobarics? Like the Russians do? But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  4329. https://youtu.be/sLVlkZiMJsM
    1
  4330.  @MrPanetela  He ends up as nuclear dust too. Russians haven't faired too well in their air operations.
    1
  4331. Good luck, guys!
    1
  4332. Interesting. Well done.
    1
  4333. The candy broke a something-or-other in the labyrinth.
    1
  4334. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4335. Pure cr*p.
    1
  4336. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4337. Fantastic! Call me 'whatever', but I want to see these back in production. Step 1 is letting people know this IS an option in personal transportation. That means seeing it, riding in it, and maybe driving it. --> I'd pay to take a ride in this, to have the experience. Next is: "I want one of those, and how can I get one?" Want to be a "travel 2CV exhibition"? :) Cheers!
    1
  4338. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4339. The Chinese have a working Pebble Bed reactor. And a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.
    1
  4340.  @janus3555  East Asians k--- our a-- in everything that involves work. Do you know Temu? Do you know any Americans that could come close to producing that AT ALL, let alone competitively priced from 12,000 miles away?
    1
  4341. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4342. "Hey George Floyd" https://youtu.be/OEvMc-K8XHY
    1
  4343. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  4344. Go Kayleigh!
    1
  4345. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  4346.  @harishankarkandankumarath9922  When a country has millions of people living in third world squalor, don't lecture the rest of us about your upward mobility while pissing away resources on space shots. It is an insult to the humanity of both rich and poor countries.
    1
  4347.  @bodhisathvan2086  Going to the moon while millions live in squalor is a very Indian thing to do.
    1
  4348.  @harishankarkandankumarath9922  Sure, I'm jealous of mass squalor. "Yes, India has world class squalor."
    1
  4349.  @harishankarkandankumarath9922  It doesn't do moonshots before squalor.
    1
  4350.  @suspaul100  To answer that, go look at the squalor of India.
    1
  4351.  @chinmay662  It's still a load of ego-prestige crap. Those engineers were bid away from, say, getting electricity to women who have to cook with cow sh*t. ... Or building sewer treatment plants instead dumping filth into the rivers. (How many sewage treatment plants could have been built with that stupid moonshot money?) "You worry about your country"? 1) YOU'RE the ones waving this stupid moonshot banner. 2) I worry about the millions of PEOPLE who live in Indian filth and squalor.
    1
  4352.  @TheUmaragu  Garbage. Moon Shots are a prestige/ego boost that wastes capital that could have been invested raising the Poor's standard of living. India has no business pissing away its resources on moonshots.
    1
  4353. The stupid Femo-Fascist dismantling of dams in the name of fish. John Stossel: Environmentalist Calls to Tear Down Dams Won’t Save Salmon But Will Waste Your Money
    1
  4354. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4355. Stolen election in 2020, ... Trojan horse in 2024
    1
  4356. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  4357. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4358. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  4359. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  4360. Sounds good!
    1
  4361. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4362. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4363. Trumpism trounces Europe, PZ gives his usual condescending short shrift.
    1
  4364. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  4365. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4366. Not put together well. Too quick on the map showing/location at the beginning.
    1
  4367.  @yomanyo327  You need to get a real job.
    1
  4368. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4369. "Word!" ... as they say in "the 'hood".
    1
  4370.  @adamseroka5609  And I'm sure that now you live with neither, thanks to small-footprint fossil fuel or nuclear plants.
    1
  4371. In other words, it was much warmer in Norway 1500 years (i.e. the Roman Warm Period). In other words, climate is changing all the time (see Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic rays source of climate control). In other words, the bullying and hysteria of the climate-change constituency is stupid.
    1
  4372. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  4373.  @avil8686  Same point, different thread. What's weird about that? . . . Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  4374. Well said, JD!
    1
  4375. So, we don't need passenger. trains, so why worry about them ?
    1
  4376. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4377. It's the slob factor. 1st world countries are reasonably responsible when it comes to ocean garbage.
    1
  4378. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4379. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4380. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4381. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant: Interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuations ( see the work of Henrik Svensmark, et al).  For regular refutation of the climate superstition masquerading as "news", see the Climate Discussion Nexus.  Just burn coal: the CO2 issue is irrelevant (see above). The sulfur issue with gaol is bogus too: sulfur is an agricultural fertilizer (ask the farmers). The "acid rain" issue is at most "a nuisance" (see the $500 million NAPAP study of 1990).  "Acid rain" was another one of those shallow media sensationalisms, like "global warming" and "ozone depletion".  Global warming is 21st century superstition.  Just burn coal. Sorry, but however intriguing these battery-thingies are, they are just another tax-sheltered boondoggle for people who don't want to do get a real job.  Just burn coal.
    1
  4382. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  4383. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  4384. Aka how to talk your way into a boondoggle career.
    1
  4385. Are these power failures due to the EPA rules about using bunker fuel?
    1
  4386. Can't take the effeminate voice.
    1
  4387. It's a sandbox boondoggle for propeller heads.
    1
  4388. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  4389. Absolutely.
    1
  4390. Bless you, Lili.
    1
  4391. Negative on this one. 1) Nancy Mace was on of the Gaetz Eight that ousted Kevin McCarthy. 2) She got it right with the Hunter Biden stunt -- he was spitting in the face of the Congressional Oversight Committee, and hence the American people.
    1
  4392.  @matsgustafsson46  The West did a piss-poor job of managing post cold war Europe.
    1
  4393. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4394. Can't take the effeminate voice.
    1
  4395. Can anyone give me a straight answer to this question: how much more energy does a co2 molecule trap vs. a water vapor molecule?
    1
  4396. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  4397. Global warming is energy what socialized medicine is to healthcare.
    1
  4398. CNN - cr*p news network.
    1
  4399. What fuel is used to burn the garage???
    1
  4400. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  4401.  @gardensofthegods  Nevermind.
    1
  4402. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4403. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  4404. Operation Gang Rape.
    1
  4405. From the Climate Crap Coalition: Exhibit A in the BIG LIE of climate quackery: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN The Ballad of Climate Superstition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CFuCYNx-1g&ab_channel=lozzagermain Here's something for the idiots of renewable energy: Thorium https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb928LkKNnz9MUiVBME4aGqi
    1
  4406.  @sarashepherd6733  Of course. This climate crap is a just government power grab.
    1
  4407. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  4408. Yes -- great stuff. I'm following it over in Electric Viking (thick accent). Great stuff -- wrong reasons: CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  4409. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4410. Privileged college students majoring in superstition. (Sung to The Ballad of Climate Quacker: Stevie Wonder's Superstion)
    1
  4411. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  4412. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4413. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4414. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  4415.  @eli-kathrinknudsen3644  Look it up.
    1
  4416. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  4417. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <-- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4418. Does anyone hate these dipsh*t self-important msm stories?
    1
  4419. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  4420. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation!
    1
  4421. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4422.  @andrewcannon587  Yes -- but good luck explaining that to the "there's not enough gold" paper-money shysters.
    1
  4423. Natural gas???? There's NO excuse for high natural gas prices. The only reason there are high prices is because of those stupid environmentalists.
    1
  4424. Min 12:00 So Deep State FOS.
    1
  4425. Shouldn't there be "no" cutting holes in the sky? If flight hours are needed, shouldn't there be a requirement that that flight time return some benefit back to the US economy? "Free flights to Disney World" or whatever?
    1
  4426. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  4427.  @Esoterrible  ?
    1
  4428.  @Esoterrible  No, he's a privilege academic, and it shows. He doesn't know what competitive work is and as such his head is in the clouds.
    1
  4429. Well done. Thanks. ... Makes me want to be an armchair saboteur.
    1
  4430.  @major__kong  "Avoid nested if's."
    1
  4431.  @jeffreyphipps1507  I'm not hearing much about "Object Oriented Programming" here. Was that a "fad" that went away?
    1
  4432.  @ThomasDoubting5  That's what passes for depth with Hillary Clinton and the idiots of YT.
    1
  4433. GW is a load of it.
    1
  4434. Yes, it says "they don't make them like they used to", thanks to that stupid EPA, CAFE standards, and DOE <-- they are waging war on the middle class, and winning.
    1
  4435. What do these stupidly indignant correspondents say when they're doing a gun control story?
    1
  4436. The 2CV is to cars what BREAD is food -- it is the baseline.    Let's get it back into production and make it one of the world's transportation options.
    1
  4437. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  4438. The movie is a pathetic load of crap. And Rob Reiner IS a meathead.
    1
  4439. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  4440. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4441.  @ronaldgarrison8478  Front-loading washers are a dictate from our stupid EPA ("saves water" - but the machines suck!) Same with those stupid toilet-flush regulations - thank the EPA idiots.
    1
  4442. @andyandyandy360 Read: more complicated, more expensive, less reliable, shorter life. (Contrast: old Maytags)
    1
  4443. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4444. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  4445. Too much "feel-good" cr*p.
    1
  4446. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  4447. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4448. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  4449. I would suggest a voiceover or voice training. The audience can tell the difference. (Go ahead and run it through a text reader; that would work.)
    1
  4450. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4451. CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  4452. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  4453. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  4454. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4455. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is orchestrated human sacrifice for a superstition.  AGW is a superstitious bunk.
    1
  4456.  @samcooley-it9xc  He's a big gee-whiz man-child talking.
    1
  4457. ​ @pswanberg1  They made the desert bloom, you're contribution is being a spoiled brat.
    1
  4458. Hey Guys! You WANT to love precision fermentation (PF) -- I mean, who wouldn't want to free up thousands of acres of land to make limitless amounts of cheese in a factory for the good of humanity? NOT SO FAST! There are two (2) problems with this: 1) It's being done for the wrong reasons: A) There is no such thing as anthropogenic global warming. CO2 is climatologically irrelevant (see the work of Henrik Svensmark for what REALLY drives interglaciation climate change (e.g. the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age); and see the Climate Discussion Nexus for the bogus and biased propaganda being used to psyop the public about "global warming". This is 21st century superstition. "Renewable Energy" is 21st century pyramid building. (Just burn coal -- it's cheap, effective, and brings cheap electricity to the whole world.) Precision Fermentation (PF) is trying to hitch a ride on this "sustainability" bandwagon with its promise of "low carbon footprint" -- but this isn't based on reality, it's based on a religious believe, and that will fail in the mass market. It may serve the religious niche of the "net zero" faith, but FREE markets don't run on religious beliefs, they run on costs and benefits. B) Precision Fermentation (PF) also appeals to the "no animals" religion, like they do in, say, India. Again, that's a religious dogma (and perhaps a niche market), but it's not an ECONOMIC argument. FREE markets don't run on religious dogma. (BTW: the vegetarianism of India and East Asia is a "making a virtue of necessity". They can't AFFORD to eat the water buffalos that also till their fields. If they ate their plow-cows, they'd starve because they'd have no draft animals to till their fields -- so they make vegetarianism a virtue of necessity.) Religious vegetarianism might work for a niche market, but it won't work for the MASS market. 2) Wrong reason #2 is the artificial, government distortions in American agriculture -- specifically CORN. 40% of American corn is burned up in the stupid price-support boondoggle known as the Ethanol Mandate (which in itself stems from the "global warming" superstition. American farmers a so productive with corn they have to burn 40% of their crop to keep prices up. This is a crime against humanity. Only 8% of the corn crop is consumed in DAIRY farming -- if the Ethanol Mandate were removed, the price of feed for dairy cows could drop by 50% in the blink of an eye. Since 40% of the cost of milk is in the feed (mostly corn), then the price of milk could drop by 20% overnight (50% x 40%)! See this article for the numbers: "The Uses of Corn: Industries Affected by High Corn Prices" [And even WITH the artificially high prices caused by the Ethanol Mandate), farmers still produce so much dairy the government has to buy 1.4 billion pounds of CHEESE (10% of an annual production) and store it in a climate-controlled cave in Missouri.] Conclusion: Sorry PF, but until you can make milk CHEAPER than the mighty American farmer, your product is going to stay a glorified science experiment. MAYBE PF milk would be profitable in some parts of the world, but if the markets are FREE, you'll always be competing with the mighty American dairy farmer. (Same for eggs.) In a place like, say, The Philippines -- if you can make PF milk cheaper than the cost to import it -- then more power to you -- God bless. But for most of the world, you've got an uphill battle to make milk cheaper than the mighty American dairy farmer. And what's the point? Religious goals aren't going to cut it (see above). You might want to direct your efforts and talents to something else. If you wanted to deliver a BIG increase in the "making the world a better place" department, I'd lobby for abolition of that horrible Ethanol Mandate -- figure out a way to drive DOWN the cost of food with all that corn-growing capability. How about more cattle feed lots and shrimp farms? Raising the American standard of living to include filet mignon and shrimp cocktail twice a week is something to look forward to.
    1
  4459. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  4460. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  4461. What about interest rates? The Boomer capital-savings gravey train is ending -- Peter himself pointed this out. We've accumulated this debt during LOW interest rates. Now the Boomers aren't saving for retirement (LOW interest rates), they're de-saving and spending their retirement savings. That means HIGH interest rates. How are we going to pay the interest on $30 trillion of debt when interest rates go up? (Nevermind that "50 basis point" Fed rate-cut crap.) And WHY is Peter saying "deficits don't matter" NOW when Congress is having its Annual Budget Disgrace???? Have you ever wondered if Peter was a Deep State operative, like the Legacy Media or Wikipedia? (See the work of MIKE BENZ, recently interviewed on Tucker Carlson.) Where else would Peter get these juicy very-insider nuggets of geo-political gossip? Why else would he be so condescending to Donald Trump and "populism"? Why else would he be supportive of the election steeling and censorship in Brazil? Why else would he be so dismissive of the MOUNTAIN of 2020 election-fraud evidence? I think he IS a Deep State operative.
    1
  4462. Can't take the effeminate voice.
    1
  4463.  @bartroberts1514  👍👍👍 Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle!!!!
    1
  4464. Can you do one on "Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle"
    1
  4465. Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle.
    1
  4466.  @skateboardingjesus4006  Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle.
    1
  4467. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  4468. The joke's on us taxpayers. Fusion is always the xx number of years away BOONDOGGLE.
    1
  4469. @cupidok2768  Fusion: the World's Greatest Boondoggle.
    1
  4470. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  4471. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  4472. Someone in law enforcement told me, "You can't carry a gun if you're on Prozac."
    1
  4473.  @DK-Coffee  That's the point. Aren't cops "law enforcement"?
    1
  4474. Well done. Thanks.
    1
  4475.  @thepittsburghpodcast  See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  4476. This kind of a fluff piece. (Like a network-news report.)
    1
  4477. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4478. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  4479. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  4480. Ha! Very funny.
    1
  4481. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  4482. Phew... Can't believe this is the US of A. MAGA!
    1
  4483. Great video, but I don't think the Fed SOLD bonds in 2018-19, they merely let bonds mature. When that happens, they credit (reduce) their Assets and debit (reduce) their Liabilities. What are Federal Reserve LIABILITIES? They are in your pocket. They are the Federal Reserve Notes we call money. They are the money the Fed printed to buy those bonds in the first place.
    1
  4484. America Is Screwed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU3r2IzztBA
    1
  4485. Needs a lapel mic for better audio.
    1
  4486. "Yes, I agree."
    1
  4487. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4488. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... 1) the fact that you're telling us means that solar is mostly high-class bragging rights, (at the expense of poor people who have high cost electricity cost-shifted to them;. "go California!") 2) CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4489. I don't care about global warming. Am I going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? No. What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J
    1
  4490. WGAS about this clickbait video?
    1
  4491. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4492. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4493. Audio is too dramatic.
    1
  4494. She makes a good case.
    1
  4495. This has-been gets air time and turns a blind eye to the outright fraud of 2020. Typical CNN cr*p.
    1
  4496. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4497. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4498. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4499. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4500. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4501.  @TeddyRumble  Absolutely.
    1
  4502. CO2/climate-change: the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4503. Can't take the hair and the beard and the IDGAS shirt.
    1
  4504. Stupid climate quack feel-goodery and superstition.
    1
  4505. @David Moore Can't wait to hear what Scotty Killer has to say about this crap.
    1
  4506. @David Moore Less reliable/more expensive. Thank you, POS Democratic Party.
    1
  4507.  @timothy2935  Americans now have to scrounge for affordable transportation.
    1
  4508.  @bighands69  These are an insult to people who need these trucks to survive ("make a living").
    1
  4509. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  4510. Can't take the contrived, affected, sing-songy voice.
    1
  4511. Well done. They get better and better at handling earthquakes. Bravo! In other parts of the world -- "forget chip production" -- they are mass slaughters of people. Bravo Taiwan.
    1
  4512. Fusion is just a HUGE and STUPID BOONDOGGLE. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C (vs. 10,000,000 C for fusion) and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion con artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  4513. Wood IS "co2 absorbing". Wood is sequestered co2. Are you pulling my leg and I'm just not getting the joke?
    1
  4514. Could use a professional narrator.
    1
  4515. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  4516. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  4517. Missing the whole point: Sex is a commodity. "Sexual Freedom" made it cheap for both sexes, but it ended up screwing women the most because sex is how women control men. If sex is cheap, women lose their control over men. Sorry women, "can't have it both ways". What a sorry mess. (But don't try to tell that to the woke idiots of the Democratic party.)
    1
  4518. There must be 20 million high school kids who would be happy with this as their first car (sorry, no macho). There must be 20 million retirees who would be happy with this as their grocery shopping car. There must be 20 million 9-to-5ers who would be happy with this as their drive-to-work car.
    1
  4519. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  4520. Is this the CCP trying to bribe Hong Kongers to accept their crushing of Hong Kong?
    1
  4521.  @SenorJuan2023  No, you're not an elite, that's obvious. But you are an elit-ist, which is also obvious. It's a disappointment in PZ, and disgusting in you.
    1
  4522. Sorry, can't take the gesticulations, voice, eyebrows, bald look.
    1
  4523. Reads like an insurance policy.
    1
  4524. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4525. Gee.... a huge, gigantic explosion of a CONTAINER bound for the mid-east from China? Gosh! I wonder what that could be?
    1
  4526. Corruption? So what else is new? Most likely the presenter has never had a real job.
    1
  4527. 1) have YouTube show the Negative 👎 ratings 2) have the algorithm consider (a) the viewers negative ratings, (b) the video's negative ratings .
    1
  4528. Time? Yeah right. A whole month into the new administration. Deep State Peter is underestimating Donald Trump, again.
    1
  4529. MAGA!
    1
  4530. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  4531. Phew... watch Blue Collar Logic: Chuck Berry vs Bruce Springsteen, Two Visions of America https://youtube.com/watch?v=LMdfi46TmXM&si=Sfq-BY5mLZ_9rQsZ It's a shame that kids aren't taught that work can be a raising of the human condition, a better life for all, like Elon Musk and Thomas Edison.  That is American "can-doism" which The Left has a vested interest in demoralizing.  People excited about enterprise don't make good voters for the Democratic Party. [The cheating of the middle class out the price-reduction benefits of productivity increases doesn't help, either.]
    1
  4532. Where can you rent a 2CV?
    1
  4533. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  4534. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  4535. Does anyone get sick of this guy's haughty accent? Or is it just me? (The word "haughty" is anomonopoeic.)
    1
  4536. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  4537.  @jackdanson2  The young white female in charge of gun safety couldn't tell the difference between a live shell and blank?
    1
  4538.  @jackdanson2  Oh!!! I'm soooo impressed with your Hollywood insider in-the-know (bunch of holes).
    1
  4539. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4540. Well said, JD!
    1
  4541. They should/could show what happens when a bullet is fired through a LiFePo battery, if they can afford to... like firing theough a Battleborn 100ah RV battery.
    1
  4542. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).
    1
  4543. Peter needs to get a REAL JOB for a while. That way he (and these other glorified academics) wouldn't be so cavalier about inflation and skill sets. Scott Kilmer: don't buy any car made in Mexico.
    1
  4544.  @doujinflip  Spoken like a true elitist.
    1
  4545. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4546. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4547. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  4548. Good video, sounds like a dumb idea. Build a natural gas pipeline instead.
    1
  4549. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark).....
    1
  4550. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  4551. "Carbon Neutrality" is crap. A primer on climate quackery CO2 is a TRACE GAS - 500 ppm, that's 0.0005 or 0.05%. Trace gases do not control the climate. Professor Bob Carter PhD on Global Warming: https://youtu.be/_NW0re9EqE8 Professor Bob Carter on Global Warming Science: https://youtu.be/DRCISn1KfKQ https://youtu.be/RTSgsVdKF0Q 1 co2 molecule for every 20 Water Vapor molecules (co2 fraud) https://youtu.be/o8nvdDXR8ZE The trivial impact of co2 on greenhouse effect https://youtu.be/8hgSxTS1g38 The $22 billion climate quack business: Here's the latest from the IPCC charlatans and their total misunderstanding of the scientific method https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg The out-of-the-gate ridiculousness of global warming. https://youtu.be/jNd0HEvFWLs https://youtu.be/gXr8kC7KJNE 144 videos on climate quackery: https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ IPCC pressure tactics exposed: A Climategate Backgrounder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&list=PL6JjafE5gsb8M02zOJoMRasbZA0865k0R&index=113&t=5s That stupid Paris climate agreement https://www.prageru.com/video/the-paris-climate-agreement-wont-change-the-climate/ Trace gases do not have leverage over climate. CO2 makes up 0.05% of the atmosphere. CO2 is a trace gas. The liars at IPCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ&t=17s https://www.quora.com/Which-gases-increase-the-greenhouse-effect-more-than-carbon-dioxide?share=1 "No such thing as too much CO2" https://youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo That stupid Al Gore and the 97% of scientists fraud https://youtu.be/ewJ6TI8ccAwFt Stupid Al Gore and Canada's 2001 climate predictions https://youtu.be/DR6wds_ly2s CO2 is good. https://youtu.be/jODIYw_5A40 Truth about CO2 https://youtu.be/WDWEjSDYfxc The stupid rhetoric of the climate quacks: https://youtu.be/Yqbn76_IIMY The objective of climate-quack superstition https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-aztec-tower-of-skulls-discovered-by-archaeologists/ar-BB1bUlqX?ocid=msedgntp America: how do you make solar "cost effective"? Force up the price of electricity. Britain: how do you make heat pumps cost effective? Force up the price of gas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhAKMAcmJFg Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so how can they "cause global warming"? https://youtu.be/5SpOiHB6VsE Termites, anyone ? ? ? ? http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ https://preventdisease.com/news/10/071110_terminte_co2.shtml https://youtu.be/pMH0ksLG1oY William Happer https://youtu.be/CA1zUW4uOSw The mendacious IPCC and the stupid sealevel argument https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4 Dozens of climate cycles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZw4DdocxN0 "Renewable energy" is a kids' lemonade stand business model. Why? Because Mommy and Daddy ( the power grid) is always there to provide power when lemonade-renewable doesn't feel like working (i e. when it's nightime or it's cloudy). [Let's not talk about what happens when the kids' lemonade stand business model is bought into for more than a Saturday afternoon and weather doesn't comply with the business plan, e.g. the Texas winter of 2021.] Bob Carter on the butchering of the scientific method: https://youtu.be/eBcIuxigoCM Naturally occurring CFCs and PCBs: "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." https://chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Researchers investigate ‘PCB-like’ chemicals made by Mother Nature https://www.whoi.edu/news-insights/content/natural-pollutants-in-fish/ Energy Communism https://tiny.iavian.net/1g49t Ienesco couldn't write a play this absurd. https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs 120 videos on climate quackery https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video/ Hubris https://youtu.be/P19ywkobLX8 Stupid Prince Charles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFftQwHUyOg Rising sea level quackery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4 Sea level https://youtu.be/WTRlSGKddJE Matt Ridley and the stupid "sustainability" argument https://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE Banker talks about climate quackery https://youtu.be/5QHCxZt616w Thomas So we'll on climate quackery https://youtu.be/1cEWw0Cfg8k UN plan to tax meat to force eating bugs. https://youtu.be/op-_4gBoCYs Christopher Moncton on renewable energy quackery. https://youtu.be/ZH4m-Cs-u3Y Dr. Judith Curry https://youtu.be/YBdmppcfixM ..
    1
  4552. Margaret Thatcher? Indira Ghandi? Please -- stop it with the "woman" schtick.
    1
  4553. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  4554. Weren't FEMA personnel briefed on those cultural differences? Floods like this are normal for Appalachia. Why wasn't FEMA prepared for that aspect of relief work in Appalachia?
    1
  4555. Less accent, please.
    1
  4556. @torquecars  I assume you want to maximize viewership. You'll improve the experience for North American viewers if you post a version where the text is read by MS Word.
    1
  4557. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them....
    1
  4558. Europe has a bad case of Femo-Fascism.
    1
  4559. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4560. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  4561. Me me me me... Me me me Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. This is sickening on so many levels. "How to screw the lower middle class and make them pay for your feel-goodery."
    1
  4562. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  4563. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you.
    1
  4564. America used to be a can-do place. This project would enrich the world, but now everyone is a selfish NIMBY. Shame on you. * * * The Great Lakes surface area if 500 billion square feet. The Arizona water allotment is 2.5 million acre feet per year, or 110 billion cubic feet of water 110 billion divided by 500 billion is 0.22 of an inch. In other words, 1/4" of Great Lakes water would DOUBLE the water allotment to Arizona (and Arizona doesn't even use all the water in its allotment every year (I guess they use less when it rains more than usual). Great Lakers get upset over 1/4 inch of water depth???
    1
  4565. "The Reagan Crowd?"
    1
  4566. Wrong Wrong Wrong Rare earths are rare IN THE US because of mining restrictions related to (trivially) radioact THORIUM (which happens to be the key to a mega-wealthier future, but that's another topic). Please go through this playlist ... https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J ... for the scoop on the rare earth shortage being another made-in-Washington screw-up that we're all suffering from; while becoming dependent on China for them, which doesn't have to put up with the quackery that goes with anything with the word radioactive somewhere in the same paragraph.
    1
  4567. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4568. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4569. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4570. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,.
    1
  4571. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4572. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  4573. Sorry, but what is it with that Brit/Aussie marbles accent? E.g. "Woawd" instead of "world".
    1
  4574. Fusion is the World's 2nd Greatest Boondoggle after "renewable energy". Just burn coal. - there's no such thing as a greenhouse effect (Tom Nelson channel). - the "acid rain" scare of the 80s was trivial and bogus (NAPAP study). - climate is coming by cloud formation, which is a function of the relationship between cosmic rays and solar-mass-ejections/'solar wind' (Henrik Svensmark)....
    1
  4575. Torpedo the Kerch Bridge with long range torpedoes?
    1
  4576.  @johnroscoe2406  Dated... "If they can go to the moon, they can make a torpedo the destroy concrete.
    1
  4577. Yes -- great stuff. I'm following it over in Electric Viking (thick accent). Great stuff -- wrong reasons: CO2 is climatalogically irrelevant. Global warming is 21st century superstition. Interglaciation climate change (e.g. medieval warm period) is caused by cosmic ray fluctuation ( see Henrik Svensmark et al). Just burn coal.
    1
  4578. Ranked Choice Voting is a Soros-funded initiative. It castrates the primary process in favor of incumbents. It is a typical Soros POS.
    1
  4579. MSNBC -- the source of business accumen and insight -- ROFL? 😂
    1
  4580. Sorry to spoil the fun of a well-meaning science buff, but... CO2/climate-change is the biggest mass-fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.
    1
  4581. Besides the cr*p that is anthropogenic climate change, I have to wonder how big Mr. Gee Whiz's trust fund is.
    1
  4582. Good work Tom. One hates to be negative, but I've seen other videos by V. and there's something not to like about them - the smugness and superiority you get from SJWs and tree huggers. These people need to spend a year supporting themselves doing a Real Job. (I bet these people have trust funds and "work" at hobby-jobs that have a big feel-goodery component to them.)
    1
  4583. Too much gesticulation.
    1
  4584. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4585.  @Gstyle1  How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4586.  @spxram4793  How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4587. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them......
    1
  4588. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4589. It's a hoax. The whole premise of AGW -- the greenhouse effect -- is wrong. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8 https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/climate-change-banned-words/art-climate-change?utm_source=Breakthrough+Newsletters&utm_campaign=12e6304fed-BTI_Weekly_1_18_2023_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_49b872540e-12e6304fed-466887052 If heat rises, why is it so cold in the upper atmosphere? https://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae670.cfm
    1
  4590. But isn't he off by one news cycle? Didn't Iran missile US bases, in their Allah Akbar perspective? Isn't now the time to hit their nuke facilities, given their crazy regime?
    1
  4591. As much as we watch Peter Zeihan for his geopolitics, he is a never-had-a-real-job ivory tower elitist. He does not understand the American middle class, the American value of liberty, or what it's like to work for a living. He is the academic equivalent of Hollywood idiot-celebrity. Soon he'll be telling us how great it is to eat bugs. "Hey Peter! Please go spend a week under one of those windmills you think are so hippie-cool!"
    1
  4592. $26 billion for The Wall? Low skilled immigrant household consume $20,000 per year more in government than they pay in taxes. http://www.heritage.org/immigration/report/the-fiscal-cost-low-skill-immigrants-the-us-taxpayer The Fiscal Cost of Low-Skill Immigrants to the U.S. TaxpayerMay 22, 2007 About an hour read Download Report
    1
  4593. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4594. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4595. Min 52:50. The divergence is where NIXON WELSHED ON THE GOLD STANDARD.
    1
  4596. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,,
    1
  4597. What is "de-population"?
    1
  4598. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4599. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4600. Too much sing-song in the voice.
    1
  4601. Needs better mic snd less accent. Can't listen to it.
    1
  4602. What's a TIA?
    1
  4603. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  4604. This happened in the 70s.
    1
  4605.  @michaeljarvis5489  Cheaper housing too - no "housing bubbles".
    1
  4606. How did cars get this effing complicated??? Those stupid vents used to be Just Cables and Levers!   How did it become necessary for them to have... - electronic controls? - servo motors? - gear mechanisms? Can someone explain that... FULLY? As with many things CARS these days,  REAL reason isn't some mealy-mouth explanation from an "industry expert".  The REAL reason is probably some EPA/DOT/DOE LAW that dictates or necessitates technological CONTORTIONS like this.  (Like that stupid high-pressure CO2 air conditioning.)
    1
  4607.  @dan-bz7dz  Not when it benefits the murderous CCP.
    1
  4608. Peter Zeihan is an operative of the Deep State. How else would he be privy to the deep, juicy morsels like Xi Jinping's isolation?
    1
  4609. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4610. Can't they "remediate"? Can't they pump water back into the gas holes to support the ground minimize the earthquakes?
    1
  4611.  @fred6319  You sound highly skilled and competent in the field of petroleum geology.
    1
  4612. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4613. Minute 18:30 --- Income Inequality
    1
  4614. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  4615. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4616. Renewables are cheaper? What is the history electricity prices in California, Australia, Germany, England?
    1
  4617. Does anyone get sick of this guy's haughty accent? Or is it just me? (The word "haughty" is anomonopoeic.)
    1
  4618. Another "guns are bad" interview from a Liberal Media dipschzit. "Hey ABC know-it-all -- what would CRIME be without the 2nd Amendment?" The 2nd Amendment Makes All Others Possible.
    1
  4619. This is Peter Zeihan being an apologist for the paper-money rapers of the middle class. "Chronic poverty"? "Income inequality"? <--- paper money inflation! Gold raises EVERYONE'S standard of living by lowering prices that result from higher productivity. The Federal Reserve has cheated the middle class out of a 4-day workweek and a defined benefit pension plan.
    1
  4620.  @sinemacula1327  WTF is a "shortage of collateral". That simply makes no sense in the real world. What's wrong with CASH? How does one have 'too much cash"?
    1
  4621.  @sinemacula1327  Could you please send all your "no value" cash to me?
    1
  4622. Go Vivek!
    1
  4623. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4624. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4625. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  4626. What about Japan and it's history of debt games?
    1
  4627.  @tomprice5496  He never once made any parallels to Japan, but they are apt.
    1
  4628. What island did you go to?
    1
  4629. What planet is this Deep State load of it on ???? Nafta 2? Abraham Accords? 4 years of relative peace? Iran contained? Turnover of that sleazy TPP?
    1
  4630. Less accent and gesticulations, thanks.
    1
  4631. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  4632. This is a stupid effort. There Is No Warming: https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg This should be greeted as good news, but it probably won't because everyone's so invested in the CO2 superstition.
    1
  4633.  @nicoweb11780  Not as bad as losing minds to climate quackery.
    1
  4634. Hamas and Iran want to scuttle the Saudi/Israeli reprochement .
    1
  4635. Once again, Peter Zeihan shows himself to be a Deep State, ivory tower, out-of-touch, elitist (nevermind the charities). "Get a real job, Peter!"
    1
  4636.  @Sven_Dongle  You've never seen Big Bang Theory??? LOL. How telling. You should check it out. It's about computer geeks.
    1
  4637. "Wishful thinking".
    1
  4638. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4639. Indeed, Germany's stupid green-energy climate quackery encouraged Russia to think they had Germany by the balls and could knock over Ukraine and get away with it. Hey Germany -- how's that "green energy" working out?
    1
  4640.  @jondonnelly3  Germany has to beg/buy nuclear electricity from France... uh boy. ("from the birthplace of nuclear physics").
    1
  4641. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4642. This is what a shill for the murdererous CCP looks like.
    1
  4643.  @cestmoi-la-reveuse  It's easy... They just put a gun to your head. Then follow it up with idiotic propaganda, like this video.
    1
  4644. Is Peter Zeihan an agent, operative, and apologist for the Deep State? See: Brazil Bans Free Speech in the Name of Democracy. Are We Next? | Ep. 1437 See: Mike Benz: The Real Reason for Pavel Durov’s Arrest, and the Deep State’s Plan to Control Our Speech
    1
  4645. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  4646. Is this a performance in mediocrity or is it just me?
    1
  4647. Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  4648. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  4649. Good work! Good luck!
    1
  4650. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  4651. They get on the buses through the rear door.
    1
  4652. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  4653. Decarbonization is 21st century cathedral/pyramid building. It is the orchestrated, imposed human sacrifice for a superstition.
    1
  4654. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4655. Hey Two-Bit... for all your "gee whiz journalism", I'm bothered by how you brushed over FRACKING (!). Isn't FRACKING one of the miracles of the 21st century???? Before fracking, we were looking at gasoline scarcity and being held hostage to foreign countries. How can you be so dismissive of commercial miracle like fracking?
    1
  4656. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal.
    1
  4657. Don't like the hustler voice. Don't like the filibuster boilerplate narrative. "Please get to the point without the manipulative song and dance."
    1
  4658. Do these network news reports make you sick? Or is it just me?
    1
  4659. Difficult accent. Can you publish a version where MS Word reads the text?
    1
  4660. HS. He's talking about the degradation of big Democratic cities.
    1
  4661. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. Prove me wrong. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect: YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is. * * * The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  4662. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4663. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of. https://youtube.com/c/CDN_ClimateDN
    1
  4664. If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
    1
  4665. Idea? How about 2nd Amendment and a secure border to keep desperately poor people out of the country?
    1
  4666. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4667. did you get the notes?
    1
  4668. Thanks for making. But could you use 'real' maps, instead of 'cartoon' maps? It helps to see exactly where in the state the town is.
    1
  4669. See Tucker Carlson's interview with Xi Van Fleet who wrote Mao's America (a lived-through-both comparison of the Cultural Revolution and present day Anerica).
    1
  4670. What a load of spin-crap! Trumpism TROUNCED Europe.
    1
  4671. Heating and cooling are "your largest energy bills"? Well, no... in total, the biggest energy consumer is transportation.
    1
  4672. Have any of these idiots heard of the "Supply" and "Demand" ? Do any of them understand what "$60 billion dollars' worth of copper" means to the world's standard of living? Answer: No. They're a bunch of spoiled brats throwing a tantrum so people will notice them and justify their otherwise inconsequential, worthless, existence.
    1
  4673. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud. There no such thing as a greenhouse effect. A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) https://youtu.be/NS55lXf4LZk 1) Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj6ORbRBZ2s&t=7s The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is preached from kindergarten to the nursing home. The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0? (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) https://youtu.be/JXKHfL55G2A Min 6:xx. "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption https://youtu.be/CrMGTkPADFw (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear. 4) Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect https://youtu.be/RbNNhLqhWPg In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." https://youtu.be/sY2xHk0ThJ8
    1
  4674. Hard to make sense of this. Is there a point?
    1
  4675. How about this: HIT THE RAILROADS! Shut down the railroads and the Russians will have to use trucks. Trucks take truck DRIVERS to run. And 1) Russia doesn't have men to drive trucks 2) Truck drivers "talk"
    1
  4676. Exhibit A from the Climate Crap Coalition: One of the glaring stupidities of the climate change argument is the fact that the climate was warmer than it is now in years 800 to 1200 – the Medieval Warm Period. Greenland had a thriving Viking colony and England was producing so much wine that the French were getting upset about the competition. Neither Vikings nor the English drove SUVs. The stupid assertions of climate change is government expanding its boondoggle empire through quackery and superstition. “Government imposed superstition” in the 21st century is something we should be ashamed of.
    1
  4677. This guy's such a smug, glib, twerp.
    1
  4678. They demonetized you guys? How awful. Will look you up on Patreon.
    1
  4679. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  4680. Sorry - no. See the Peter Zeihan videos on Russia's lousy geographic hand, it's emmense strategic vulnerabilities, and how it deals with them.
    1
  4681.  @FINNSTIGAT0R  To a certain extent, that's true. But nevertheless, Peter Zeihan brings the most truth to this situation. Truth first, then how to deal with it.
    1
  4682. I think renewable energy is 21st century pyramid building and GW is a load of it. Just burn coal and clean up the smoke, or use nuclear.
    1
  4683. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal.
    1
  4684. Yes.
    1
  4685. While the Sierra Club Liberals are patting themselves on the back over beavers, what about their stupid laws that prevent HUMANS from building dams on these streams?
    1
  4686. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"). Henrik Svensmark and others has a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4687. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  4688. Any chance the narrator can reduce the British accent? WautER instead of WautAH?
    1
  4689. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them.,
    1
  4690. Go for it!
    1
  4691. Well done. Thanks for making.
    1
  4692. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.......
    1
  4693. The LCOE for renewables does NOT include the cost of backup power for this kid's-lemonade-stand business model.
    1
  4694. AGW is a load of it. Decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building. Just burn coal. Electricity generation is boring. There's NO EXCUSE for expensive electricity. The real fun/challenge is synthetic gasoline -- "make gasoline as dirt cheap as electricity SHOULD be."
    1
  4695.  @clearbrain  FOS.
    1
  4696. No, we need a Flat Tax, One Tax, Once.
    1
  4697. Sorry, this "fusion power" is just a HUGE BOONDOGGLE. I'm surprised Peter doesn't know about thorium and good-old fission. FISSION, works at 600 degrees C and there's unlimited fuel for it - thorium (see the Kirk Sorenson videos). But the fusion world starts at 10 MILLION degrees C. It's stupid to try and make a POWER plant under those conditions. It's stupid to try. You'll scream when you figure out how stupid we've been in this business. Meanwhile, Fusion boondoggle artists are laughing all the way to the bank.
    1
  4698. The Aston Aerospace Omega 1 Engine looks similar.
    1
  4699. No! Ethanol is NOT GASOLINE. ... But this video is clickbait.
    1
  4700. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal
    1
  4701. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1
  4702. Chinese virologist: Not An Accident https://youtu.be/WedKKuP9NNw
    1
  4703. "Hey George Floyd" https://youtu.be/OEvMc-K8XHY
    1
  4704. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them...
    1
  4705. Too much accent and up/down voice dramatics.
    1
  4706. A**hole!
    1
  4707. Negative on this one. 1) Nancy Mace was on of the Gaetz Eight that ousted Kevin McCarthy. 2) She got it right with the Hunter Biden stunt -- he was spitting in the face of the Congressional Oversight Committee, and hence the American people.
    1
  4708. Renewables are stupid. They are a kids lemonade stand kind of business. There is no anthropogenic global warming (aka superstition). For serious energy, see Thorium (please spare me the stupid boondoggle that is "fusion") Does this guy sound like he has a trust fund, or is it just me.
    1
  4709.  @SomnoNaut  Cr*p.
    1
  4710. PS: Does CO2 wash out of the atmosphere in rain?
    1
  4711. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  4712. Be careful. This is COMMUNIST China we're dealing with. Years ago, Saudi Arabia told the world they had 200 billion barrels of oil reserves. But they wouldn't let the outside world verify that amount. What did that do? It DISCOURAGED everyone else from making investments in oil exploration. Fast forward to electric cars. EVs are getting a bum rap these days (re: esp FIRES). Without these breakthrough batteries, EVs will fail. They'll just become another FAD on the consumer landscape, like the Smart Car. Enter CATL and their "break through" battery. Aren't they signaling, "Stick with it world! Keep going with that EV foolishness that has the west doing the economic equivalent of digging a hole and filling it back up again. Don't forget, we are AT WAR with Communist China.
    1
  4713. No, - Britain didn't join the euro. - The problems are from are from the Fed's raising interest rates, British pensions going bust, BOE about-facing with "don't worry, we'll buy all your bonds." - Britain's return to prosperity after its stupid socialism was North Sea oil and Margaret Thatcher.
    1
  4714. Right. Next to "renewable energy", fusion is the world's greatest boondoggle. (It's always "30 years away"; and the premise is stupid (see the long Kirk Sorenson video)). ... And why is Germany spending 10s of billions of euros on "decarbonization" when there's WW3 on their eastern front?
    1
  4715. So what? This is the Sierra Club complaining. They made better use of the water, just like they do in the American southwest.
    1
  4716. One thing government is VERY good at is making things more expensive (at no skin off the nose of the priests in white coats). Geothermal has always been an non-starter because it's more expensive than coal/nuclear/natural gas. But since government excels at making things more expensive, just force up the cost of "fossil" till "geo" becomes cost-competitive. Simple!
    1
  4717. Minute 8:00 #6 He didn't mention the $400 million Zuck spent on getting ballots stuffed in the 2020 election. ! ! !
    1
  4718.  @SuperDrake85  There are youtubes that say they have working pebble bed and thorium molten salt reactors up and running.
    1
  4719. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels.  Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed.  CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars.  (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice.  5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity.  Electricity generation is boring.     Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline.  South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal,,
    1
  4720. Echch... Contenders for the Salvador Allende award.
    1
  4721. Smell the CCP shill.
    1
  4722. Fantastic! Bless the American worker.
    1
  4723. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fraud.  YouTube video: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect (Tom Shula) 1) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Questioning the greenhouse effect The greenhouse effect is the primordial sacrament of modern climate science. It is.  * * *  The dystopian, one-party, Orwellian, preached from kindergarten to the nursing home.  The simple name of this effect and its ubiquity in culture and mainstream media leave no doubt that we are dealing here with solid and fully understood Natural Science. But how does this actually effect work? 2) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Atmospheric greenhouse effect ~0?  (Applying IPCC formulas to the no-atmosphere moon. Conclusion: there is no greenhouse effect on earth.) Min 6:xx.  "Abuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann model..." 3) YouTube video:  Markus Ott: Saturation of the CO2-IR-Absorption (Min 0:10) The alleged greenhouse effect of 33 degrees centigrade is the result of an improper use of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law (black-body radiation), and that a less abusive application of this law makes the greenhouse effect almost disappear.  4) YouTube video: Markus Ott: Convection and Thermalisation Kill The Greenhouse Effect YouTube video: In-Depth Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder's Talk: Greenhouse Effect  "Heat transport in the atmosphere... IT'S CALLED WEATHER." YouTube Channel: Climate Discussion Nexus.  267 videos on climate fraud, hustle, and superstition mongering
    1
  4724. What is UNWRA?
    1
  4725. No Peter, intermittency IS a problem with the biggest windmills: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+intermittency+of+the+largest+Vestas+windmills&client=ms-android-tracfone-us-rvc3&sca_esv=7e44f643f11633e6&sxsrf=AHTn8zoYJTeuhkFXoYBEGdxLRNlgwPOfQA%3A1738803152315&ei=0AekZ5fLErmg5NoPy9DvsAQ&oq=cost+of+a+Vestas+15+megawatt+windmill&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIiVjb3N0IG9mIGEgVmVzdGFzIDE1IG1lZ2F3YXR0IHdpbmRtaWxsSABQAFgAcAB4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBEsgBAPgBBpgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp&gs_ivs=1
    1
  4726. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them..
    1
  4727. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,
    1
  4728. What's the conclusion? Is Trump's stragegy good or bad?
    1
  4729. Phew... watch Blue Collar Logic: Chuck Berry vs Bruce Springsteen, Two Visions of America https://youtube.com/watch?v=LMdfi46TmXM&si=Sfq-BY5mLZ_9rQsZ It's a shame that kids aren't taught that work can be a raising of the human condition, a better life for all, like Elon Musk and Thomas Edison.  That is American "can-doism" which The Left has a vested interest in demoralizing.  People excited about enterprise don't make good voters for the Democratic Party. [The cheating of the middle class out the price-reduction benefits of productivity increases doesn't help, either.]
    1
  4730. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4731. CO2/climate-change is the biggest fraud since communism.  (See Henrik Svensmark for the cosmic-ray/solar-activity/cloud-formation/climate relationship.)  CO2 is a ruse.  Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation  (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.)   Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations.  YouTube has dozens of videos about them,.
    1
  4732. What's a NOTAM?
    1
  4733. Hellish narration. Sounds like those obnoxious main-stream media new shows.
    1
  4734. too much hyperbole... :(
    1
  4735. Navy ordnance expert: "obvious fakes" https://youtu.be/_QPNm8ZOHhw
    1
  4736. Yes. In general, Peter's never-had-a-real-job academic elitism is disgusting.
    1
  4737. One look at the satellite map of the town would show the world what a fire hazard the grass fields to the east of it are. Talk about an accident waiting to happen. Californians know ALL about that. Somebody in the fire insurance business could have seen it. Sorry for the 20-20 hindsight, but it's not rocket science. Californians are alwasy nervous about "accumulated underbrush".
    1
  4738. No boondoggles here.
    1
  4739. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm period (extra credit for explainging the Little Ice Age)). 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land.
    1
  4740. Is this guy a "man child" or is it just me? Is his audience a bunch of "man children" too?
    1
  4741. South Africa made its own gasoline for decades from coal (Sasol). This EV stuff is stupid. I wish Porshe well, but the manufacturing of gasoline has already been mastered and proven by Sasol. Maybe Porsche wants to appease the global-warming tree-huggers with "carbon neutrality". That's stupid too.
    1
  4742. "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4743.  @flotsamike  "Renewable Energy" -- a kid's-lemonade-stand business model, "batteries not included". * * * I don't care about global warming. I'm not going to impoverish myself by 25% in order to "fight global warming"? What are the consequences of global warming? 1) A 1-2 degree increase in average temperature: I don't care. I can deal with that by turning down the temperature on the AC thermostat (and I prefer milder winters). 2) A 1.2 inches per decade rise in sea level: again, I don't care becuase: a) Most people live well enough above that for that to be of any concern to anyone alive today. b) In 100 years time, this may be a concern for people living on beachfront property, but they are the most wealthy people among us and I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% to preserve their vacation homes. Coastal cities that haven't already built their waterfronts to handle a 1.2 foot rise in sea level have 100 years to deal with the problem. c) Poor and low lying subsistence agricultural lands have a tough row to hoe, but sea levels have been rising for more than 100 years, and their circumstances would be better improved by moving out of subsistence agriculture and into higher value added (and mobile) occupations. 3) Oceans becoming less basic (currently 8.1 pH; 7.0 is neutral, i.e. tap water): again, I don't care. a) I don't care if clam shells become more fragile at this level of pH. b) I find it preposterous to hear that clams, with billions of years of evolution behind them in a hostile environment (sea water), can't handle a 0.1 decrease in basic ("alkaline", not "acidic") pH -- which is a movement toward neutral, i.e. "fresh" water. [The term "ocean ACIDITY" is used by climate hustlers to incite fear for political and personal gain.] Have I missed anything? Melting glaciers? Sorry, I'm not impoverishing myself by 25% over receding glaciers. Sorry, but I don't care. The costs and power grabs behind this issue are astounding. So are the lottery-ticket benefits, unless you are in on the scam: the politicians, enforcers, and renewable energy opportunists. If you feel so strongly about global warming, you should lobby for THORIUM MOLTEN SALT REACTORS -- not only for electricity, but for manufacturing synthetic gasoline -- all carbon neutral. If not already familiar with it, here is a playlist for it: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6JjafE5gsb9nSmudoj5MUKxX8LTKO0-J Here is a list of Australia's green energy fiascos: https://youtu.be/HWRyVemsTvs Big Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere (Aug 27, 2021) John Robson/CDN – Climate Discussion Nexus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6VM41-v2gg Min 16:30 What we found (is) the amount of heat that is being retained by THE MODELS is much greater than what we actually see in the real world. So this is important in the sense that it's a test metric. In other words all the models show this should be happening when you increase greenhouse gases -- when you increase that heating amount, and it's something we don't find, which means the real atmosphere evidently has ways to expel that heat that the models don't allow. It turns out that the models that agree most with the actual observations -- you know, they're still too warm but they're closer to it -- are the ones that are LEAST SENSITIVE TO CARBON DIOXIDE -- the ones that have the lowest warming rate at the surface. Scientifically it's just uh amazing or almost incomprehensible because in in the scientific method we make a claim and then we test that claim against independent data. – John Cristy, professor of atmospheric science. Vs. Min 4:00 to 11:00 1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate (Sep 21, 2008) Source: Potholer54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=1
    1
  4744.  @Thomas-gk42  Will you be able to handle the load of self-serving hype from the alarmists who are advancing their trillion dollar boondoggle?
    1
  4745.  @kimlibera663  Global Warming is based on a gigantic FRAUD, namely, the "greenhouse effect". (see Tom Shula).
    1
  4746. Does anyone have links to the statistics Elon is talking about?
    1
  4747. His slamming criticisms of fracking are gross.
    1
  4748. Can't stand it.
    1
  4749. Back in the Chechen wars there was a suspicious Moscow bomb exploded where 600 Muscovites were killed. "Everyone" suspected Putin was behind it because he needed to galvanize support for the Chechen war.
    1
  4750. Negative on this one. 1) Nancy Mace was on of the Gaetz Eight that ousted Kevin McCarthy. 2) She got it right with the Hunter Biden stunt -- he was spitting in the face of the Congressional Oversight Committee, and hence the American people.
    1
  4751. Peter Zeihan: the Deep State apologist, as usual. "Don't poke the Russian bear" -- Nigel Farage to EU (NATO puppet) in 2014 Nigel Farage - Don't Poke The Russian Bear With A Stick
    1
  4752. 1) there is nothing unusual happening with the climate. (Please explain the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period.) The co2 climate quacks can't, so they airbrush it OUT of the record. (”Hide the decline!"; "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."). HENRIK SVENSMARK and others have a cosmic-ray/solar-flares explanation that (when combined with malankovic and volcano/meteors) explains ALL the climate change we observe. Co2 is irrelevant in earth climate. 2) there is nothing wrong with burning fossil fuels. Its problems in high-density areas are trivial to fix and already have been fixed. CO2 is not a pollutant. 3) Climate alarmism is a big-lie superstition supported by tax-bribed liars. (See Climate Discussion Nexus for 100s of videos on climate quackery, deception, and realism.) 4) decarbonization is 21st century pyramid building and human sacrifice. 5) there is NO excuse for expensive electricity. Electricity generation is boring. Just burn coal and scrub the smoke in densely populated areas. 6) the only challenge is manufacturing market quantities of cheap gasoline. South Africa has already done this for decades (Sasol), using coal. 7) Elon Musk: the Laptop Class is in La-La Land. 8) The "greenhouse effect"is a fraud. There's no such thing. The fraud is based on the the interaction between certain specific-wavelength photons and the CO2 molecule IN A VACUUM, i.e., no other molecules are bumping into it. (I.e., what happens with the filament in lightbulb.). But that's not what happens in the atmosphere because the atmosphere is not a vacuum. See Ott's "New Perspective on Atmosphere Heat Transfer" See the "Abuse of the Boltzman Black Body Radiation Model" What happens with photons and CO2 in the atmosphere is as follows: - the CO2 molecule absorbs a certain specific-wavelength photon, - it gets kicked up to a higher/unstable energy level, - it collides with another O2 or N2 molecule (99% of the atmosphere), and the photon's energy is transferred to the O2/N2 molecular as heat, like the rest of the sun's energy we experience as heat. - the heated O2/N2 molecule joins the atmosphere's heat conveyor to the upper atmosphere and elsewhere. We call that "weather". There's not climatological problem with CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant nor a "greenhouse gas". * * * "Renewable energy" is 21st Century pyramid building (besides being a Kid's Lemonade Stand business model). It's ridiculous. See John Robson's (CDN) "Trouble in the Tropical Troposphere".
    1
  4753. CO2 is a ruse. Climate change the "Greens" are talking about is caused by changes in the cosmic-rays/solar-activity relationship and cloud formation (See the work of Henrik Svensmark.) Cloud formation by actual cosmic rays can be scene with the naked eye in Cloud Chamber demonstrations. YouTube has dozens of videos about them.....
    1