Comments by "Jkauppa" (@Jkauppa) on "Mathologer" channel.

  1. why would you be loyal to people
    2
  2.  @PC_Simo  ja ja ja :) sisu tai gifu, sotilas ja lepo
    2
  3. try polar coordinate integral of area of circle/ellipse, and polar coordinate line integral of circle / ellipse perimeter length
    1
  4. ie f(x) = re^(i*theta) for circle, and the variant of r as function of theta for ellipse
    1
  5. thats a complex path integral tho
    1
  6. or integral from e^0 = 1 to e^i2pi = 1
    1
  7. elliptic eulers formula (complex) instead
    1
  8. variant of the e^(i*theta) = cos(theta) + i*sin(theta)
    1
  9. how about just scaling the i-component with the b coefficient of ellipse, and real component with the a coefficient of ellipse: f_e(theta) = a*cos(theta) + b*i*sin(theta)
    1
  10. ectoplasm in your shirt, wipe it off
    1
  11. try n*log(primes) | mod 9, ie, multiples of log2() of primes mapped to a ring of 9, you get the probability distribution function estimation of the primes log distribution, ie, the mod instead or same as the angle, mod is the angle from 0 to 360 of mod 0 to max
    1
  12. histogram of the log2 primes mod 9 should be interesting
    1
  13. f(primes) = log2(primes) | mod 10, (< 1000000), is more interesting looking graph, of the primes
    1
  14. this is the same class that prime visualizations
    1
  15. change the number base, like binary, number presentation, also multi-dimensional plots with the bases as the dimensions
    1
  16. set map theory
    1
  17. its a function
    1
  18. modulo-ring
    1
  19. try factorial approximation by exponentiation of integral of log, ie, approximating the exponent of sum of log by multiplication distributions
    1
  20. are you an apologer
    1
  21. try to fit n=2 solution space to n=4
    1
  22. what comes after 1,2,6,24,120,720,...
    1
  23. what is the n-th element without calculating any of the previous terms on start or between
    1
  24. of course its factorial but
    1
  25. what a stupid examination question to ask what you know
    1
  26. you knew it beforehand so you are just teasing with knowledge
    1
  27. approximation for large numbers must be digit accurate
    1
  28. having fun with dots eh
    1
  29. not worth becoming your slave worker (president, order guy)
    1
  30.  @Mathologer  its not an honor to "be your president", its a disgrace to be people's slave, be free or better slave of God, not law
    1
  31. no wonder when x^2 + y^2 = z^2 is circle radius formula, but the radius term is z^2 or radius is z
    1
  32. so you only take all z^2 where z is integer, and find all the consecutive circles
    1
  33. actually you only put z = n, with step of 1, discrete solutions to the x^2 + y^2 = n^2
    1
  34. circle is pi, the solutions are along the rim/perimeter/circumference of the circle
    1
  35. only the one owned by God, not by people through law service, last forever
    1
  36. radial form of the rim of circle, intersecting with the integer (x,y) axis grid
    1
  37. ie the complex radial form of x+yi complex number, z = re^(i*theta) = r (cos(theta) + i sin(theta)), where r = n (the circle integer radius)
    1
  38. confess that "i sin" so you may be saved
    1
  39. two equations to be integer grid stepping, n*cos(theta) = a, n*sin (theta) = b, where a,b = integer
    1
  40. all laws lead to sin
    1
  41. only Spirit leads to freedom, actual freedom
    1
  42. rearranging for n, solving for n, gives, a/cos(theta) = b/sin(theta), the final integer test equation generator
    1
  43. actually its tan(theta) = sin(theta)/cos(theta) = b/a, where a,b are integers, gives the angle where the a,b are integers
    1
  44. what you see is what you get, dont you say
    1
  45. psychonachos
    1
  46. not even one, booze off
    1
  47. right by witch lens
    1
  48. oh gosh
    1
  49. take absolute value, then you get rid of the 180 degree jump, math miss-use problem
    1
  50. mythologer
    1