Comments by "Jkauppa" (@Jkauppa) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1. whats the problem? stupid problem
    2
  2. overlapping multiple simultaneous reverse paths, same traveling salesman return place clock
    1
  3. quantum entangled photons
    1
  4. you ask the wrong question, ask better question
    1
  5. take a picture
    1
  6. telescope
    1
  7. synchronize three radars
    1
  8. gps with time in the signal photons
    1
  9. have each check point to increase the distance traveled by constant amount then return same path to the origin, you have the difference one way took
    1
  10. ie, travel to check point, split signal, half goes to origin, half goes to check point 2, then any number of similar check points in various medias, always half coming back to origin, half or 99% like radar moving on to the next check point
    1
  11. your need for dark energy or matter is only accountancy error, fix your light view, the matter is around the place there is other stuff, moving stuff, do you know how fast the background is moving, or any sun blasts their energy around the galaxy, as energy density increase, the photons
    1
  12. ether = dark matter
    1
  13. reasoning is the worst proof ever
    1
  14. place the photons emitted and traveling, in the picture
    1
  15. trial is teasing God, just receive as gift
    1
  16. leaf spring returns to its shape, and its just iron sheet layers, same for self-suspended airless leaf spring tires
    1
  17. our collab is over, donzo, gone
    1
  18. no fuss quantum by laser/light frequency combinatorics, just tag a pass-though with its signature, then detect if a direction has them all, you have light speed to solve your things
    1
  19. so do that in cube world, same logic
    1
  20. your definitions do not constrain anyone
    1
  21. Schrödinger form of solution is useless
    1
  22. its only about belief, and I dont serve laws, however they are
    1
  23. if you keep economy non-real, like your "works", then you dont get the real solution, you get the non-real solution, and you start talking nonsense
    1
  24. money does not aid the "solution" of real things, however you keep it as "wisdom", knowledge does not help in the actual things, only Spirit makes alive
    1
  25. get real
    1
  26. keep it sqrt(-1), dont interpret it, in wrong ways
    1
  27. dont constrain yourself to the explanation of someone else
    1
  28. no it does not, explain, you only think it is, or preach it is, the solution
    1
  29. dont believe in any stories, just use them, freely
    1
  30. if you are clever, you see, that the original equation does not require a sqrt() operation of -1, its just x^3, x^2 and x, which all happily accept positives and negatives, newtons solution
    1
  31. it only cares if the end sum is zero or the x-terms are equal to the constant, negative or positive or zero
    1
  32. equation handling mistake, mess-up, duh, basic math failure, assumptions on what you can and cant do
    1
  33. square root of -1 should behave same as the positive square root of 1, so take sqrt(-1)=-sqrt(1)
    1
  34. the real axis value of sqrt(-1) should be very similar and close-by to the newton zero-crossing absolute decimal value, not in any other value-definition than close to a real value, fractional values are still real, etc
    1
  35. electricians use "i" for the sqrt(-1), no need to evaluate it, at max, minimally you dont need to consider it, at all
    1
  36. you just entangled yourself to more jank, no thanks, pun definitely intended, and intended again
    1
  37. you must specify what question you are asking, and if its "how many real solutions", crossing the line, then you can have something from zero to power amount of solutions, depending the parameters
    1
  38. does the polynomial of degree n have a real/any presentation, and if it does, what it is, in the form of (x-x_0)(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n)+d=0, or switching sides, [x(0)(1)(2)(n)]=-d
    1
  39. have your law be Christ, God, not letter, false gods, not text, not text-law, but Spirit, life, itself
    1
  40. how long is meter in a frame of reference
    1
  41. so what about measuring errors in the temperature
    1
  42. the curse of mutually dependent measurements
    1
  43. you could also define weight by cantilever bending
    1
  44. or any weight lever multiplier arm
    1
  45. you can self-calibrate a mass measure test by directing the same mass (the same object) to two/both sides of the measurement device
    1
  46. cvd/pvd nano scale stuff
    1
  47. making the comparison weights by nano processes
    1
  48. if you measure the same object by multiple different cantilever bending, you get the exact independent weight, even without knowing the cantilever material details
    1
  49. self-calibrating (referencing) system
    1
  50. that could have been steam-battery-electric drive
    1