Comments by "Jkauppa" (@Jkauppa) on "driving 4 answers" channel.

  1. you are driving the aptera, the solar car
    1
  2. a car is an utility tool, should not be anything more
    1
  3. chore? never
    1
  4. let the pedal talk
    1
  5. convention is the baggage of human customs, burden like law, just copy copy copy, nothing new under the sun
    1
  6. continuous burning turbines, circular centrifugal compression, tesla turbine rim combustion jet, are better and smaller, more power per weight, all power stroke, not 1/2 or quarter
    1
  7. you can maintain perfect power point if you separate power generation with an electric drive train, ie, battery charging, like super cap, intermediary
    1
  8. you dont have to have engines in the back at all, just the best jets you can have electric
    1
  9. spinjet, also with another as energy collector and exhaust muffler
    1
  10. spin jet is not a turbo-fan/jet or a turbo-prop, its a tesla turbine based on centrifugal compression, internal combustion
    1
  11. patents are stupid and void
    1
  12. cry some law tears, not yours
    1
  13. laws are stupid, period.
    1
  14. law arguments and fights is waste, not gonna be available to mess reason, because its unreasonable, totally stupid
    1
  15. all tech is fine, law-money messes things up, and cry for you argentina
    1
  16. law servers do not decide anything
    1
  17. nuclear electric, against your wants
    1
  18. if you need precise machining, your product sucks
    1
  19. great products work anyways
    1
  20. easily breaking vs robust tolerant
    1
  21. trash control, pest removal, anything forced, money, law, military ownership
    1
  22. nose cone to remove all drag, then its a train, even electric
    1
  23. gnu does not ask launch schedules
    1
  24. are you poor
    1
  25. ok now we can talk
    1
  26. why did you not just make the block engine as parts
    1
  27. wavy thing is a shaped flywheel
    1
  28. true 1-stroke then makes an explosion to both directions in a single cylinder with one piston, if you want to be accurate
    1
  29. a two-side hammer piston is then a true 1-stroke engine
    1
  30. but its also two pistons 2-stroke linked together, meh
    1
  31. why do you fancy compression ratios, if you get the full power transfer, in vain
    1
  32. all is possible, mind you
    1
  33. dont bother explaining to a talking tease, whatever they speak
    1
  34. then the plane overtakes the car
    1
  35. the angle of the rolls acting on the wavy thing is the lever
    1
  36. continuous burn turbine engine to electric motor
    1
  37. who cares
    1
  38. better is better :)
    1
  39. yes very nice
    1
  40. impeller can be braced to be made stronger
    1
  41. ie, honeycomb and/or shrouded impeller
    1
  42. electric engine recharging turbo, just the driver replaced with a real torque electric motor, taken from the car battery
    1
  43. its separated from the exhaust, can be easily made from the cheap materials
    1
  44. "NOS" by NaClO3 decomposition to NaCl, table salt, and oxygen, simple underwater oxygen source
    1
  45. cant find?
    1
  46. there is a third option: electric transmission
    1
  47. how about the revolutionary engine as pulse piston like rotary motor but not directly a wankel, but a real revolutionary engine
    1
  48. no crank shaft
    1
  49. keep the rod linear in same position, up-down rod motion
    1
  50. either sowing machine rod, but also double sided rod piston engine, rails to convert to rotational movement, swap sides between the moving direction, one directional movement, but the revolutionary new engine as rotational pulsed combustion engine
    1