Comments by "Jkauppa" (@Jkauppa) on "Numberphile2" channel.

  1. no need to believe in the speaker
    1
  2. egotist are you
    1
  3. np trash is no proof
    1
  4. non-rules based, bridged, proof
    1
  5. no forced two--ways process
    1
  6. there is always an any option
    1
  7. language based space is lacking (for both the riddle and the solution)
    1
  8. yes math is a language
    1
  9. forced talk, or talk in general case, is only indicating you lack something
    1
  10. everything is possible, no point in talking about some limits
    1
  11. limits are the curse
    1
  12. if you forcibly un-fill everything, then you wasted what you had, for everyone
    1
  13. you can check the generating probability distribution, before you get then result based on the middle step distribution
    1
  14. they have different distributions
    1
  15. you are doing the "pick the lines | how" as bayesian probability distribution directly states, it depends on how you pick them
    1
  16. you get a different distributions relative to the measuring which stays the same, when the method of picking changes
    1
  17. so plot the distributions of the lines, lengths
    1
  18. you must get the case without the conditional | in the bayesian probability distribution
    1
  19. namely p(pure) not the p(pure|condition)
    1
  20. the neutral objective case, whatever that would be, like positioning the circle in the random space lines
    1
  21. that remark was not necessary, you dont have to have a known scale, it can be infinite, the multiplier
    1
  22. so take the scale as a variable number, then its a rule-set in arbitrary scale, there are circles in infinity
    1
  23. so if you do the same calculations in infinity, you get the same conclusions
    1
  24. so the infinity must be taken as if its constant in the measurement, not a constantly random variable number of infinity
    1
  25. so dont take infinity as a range of numbers, it must be treated as one number
    1
  26. you only have the circle, you dont have the scale, same for the dies, you have a set of n-dies, but you dont have the information what die you end up of rolling, you have a well defined riddle
    1
  27. thats a different thing if you have deal with the probability of the maximum edges of the dies
    1
  28. initial conditions rock
    1
  29. describe the process
    1
  30. the only infinite in both the circle and the dies is the sample number
    1
  31. and language that tries to describe the proof is lacking, then what you get, insecure poof out of mouth
    1
  32. it must be a prime loop
    1
  33. so 3*prime+1=prime*2^n, or it must drop down to a prime, with 2^n co-prime ladder
    1
  34. conditions for the cycle dropping to zero is to have anywhere to be a possibility (exit condition) to drop to 1
    1