Comments by "Bruce Bryant" (@Raptoraddict6610) on "Tucker: This is a disaster" video.

  1. I would move the hell out of there and never look back.
    39
  2. Nailed it. Rinse and repeat daily.
    3
  3. Oh, NOW you republicans want "the government" to step in....lol
    3
  4. Oh, but you republicans don't want "the government" intruding into your lives with all those safety regulations, remember????
    3
  5. Jesus, tell your audience the truth for once Tucker...It was a "controlled burn" rather than sitting back and waiting for an uncontrollable explosion to happen. It's what the experts thought was the safest way to deal with all those toxic chemicals. Their choices were extremely limited given the circumstances.
    3
  6. This is a STATE ISSUE...why is the Federal Government even involved?
    3
  7. Isn't it ironic how states that call our government a "swamp", immediately beg for assistance when a disaster occurs? Hurricane Ian was another prime example.
    3
  8. It's a huge environmental disaster...there really isn't anything you can do, other than move really. I'm sorry so many people like you have and will be affected.
    3
  9. Seriously folks, has Tucker EVER agreed with ANYTHING our President has done? No.
    2
  10. I have yet to see any suggestion of what the Biden administration should have done better...
    2
  11. We're sitting here laughing at your post.
    2
  12. The derailment was caused by brakes overheating on one axle...why are you all so frightened?
    2
  13. It was a "controlled burn" rather than sitting back and waiting for an uncontrollable explosion to happen. It's what the experts thought was the safest way to deal with all those toxic chemicals. Their choices were extremely limited given the circumstances.
    2
  14. The brakes on one axle overheated and caught fire.
    2
  15. Can anyone point out the last time Tucker AGREED with ANYTHING this administration has done? No? Then, I rest my case.
    2
  16. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems. But if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    2
  17. It was a "controlled burn" rather than sitting back and waiting for an uncontrollable explosion to happen. It's what the experts thought was the safest way to deal with all those toxic chemicals. Their choices were extremely limited given the circumstances.
    2
  18. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems, but if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    2
  19. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems. But if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    2
  20. Thank you.
    2
  21. I'll tell you what's so funny...Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems. But if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    2
  22. Didn't Trump reverse an Obama regulation about "automatic safety brakes" on LNG and toxic chemical railroad tankers? Why yes, yes he did.
    2
  23. So you think the railroad picked this site and derailed their train on purpose?
    2
  24.  @keithcustadiosr3088  Ah, BLM. Never mind.
    2
  25. Sure, if you can't simply win elections, then more drastic and illegal actions are called for.
    2
  26. LOL....pure evil.
    1
  27. It was a controlled burn to prevent an uncontrolled explosion....
    1
  28. Hey Tucker, not a single mention about your favorite president getting fined $110,000 dollars for defying a grand jury subpoena? I wonder why not???
    1
  29. You are a slave if all you watch is Fox...
    1
  30. I can't wait until Smartmatic takes control of this network....
    1
  31. So you'd prefer the entire railroad tanker of chemicals to simply explode?
    1
  32. I certainly hope Facebook has....
    1
  33. Google is your friend....
    1
  34. Back to Trumpism? No thank you. I'll go with what the majority of voters decide.
    1
  35.  @totallysmooth1203  Believe what you will, the courts found no election issues, 66 times.
    1
  36. What have you learned?
    1
  37. The brakes on one axle failed and caught fire.
    1
  38. What's your theory about Trump hoarding classified documents?
    1
  39. How so? There wasn't several days of advance warning this time...
    1
  40. It was deemed better to have a controlled burn than an explosion.
    1
  41. How so, what should he have done differently?
    1
  42. You make Trump proud....now send in another STOP THE STEAL donation.
    1
  43. "We don't need ...internet community and platforms to control speech." Yet here you are regurgitating exactly what Fox tells you....unreal.
    1
  44. How do you dispose of them, when they were about to EXPLODE due to the fires around them?
    1
  45. Oh, NOW republicans think "the government" should help out....
    1
  46. It wasn't done on purpose, it was caused by brakes overheating...an accident.
    1
  47. Attack the Capital...oh wait, you already did that.
    1
  48. This will be just like the LOVE CANAL in New York....uninhabitable for decades.
    1
  49. Yeah, we can all see how this is Biden's fault...grow up Tucker.
    1
  50. Tucker can only be trusted when he is UNDER OATH, otherwise he's free to just make she-it up as he goes...
    1
  51. Because?
    1
  52.  @Bonghitterd  It was caused by overheating brakes on one axle....try again.
    1
  53.  @Bonghitterd  It was a "controlled burn" rather than an uncontrollable explosion. It's what the experts thought was the safest way to deal with those toxic chemicals
    1
  54. It's a STATE issue...
    1
  55. Wow...deflection is always the first response from a lazy mind.
    1
  56. Do you feel enslaved?
    1
  57. Hey Tucker, I see you're not covering Trump being hit with a $110,000 fine for refusing a grand jury subpoena. Why is that I wonder????
    1
  58. True enough.
    1
  59. Brakes overheated on one car.
    1
  60. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems, but if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    1
  61. Yes, you are a joke. And not a funny one.
    1
  62. Excuse me, but when was the last time Tucker agreed with ANYTHING Joe has done?
    1
  63. Try winning the next election....
    1
  64.  @yrevet  Hey, as long as we can keep your party out of power, the better. If you feel like stooping to childish name calling, have at it. I can take it....
    1
  65. He was until man started screwing it up....
    1
  66. It sounds like a mechanical brake failure to me...
    1
  67. Just another toxic site to clean up...add it to the list.
    1
  68. The derailment was caused by brakes overheating on one axle...why are you so frightened?
    1
  69. They who?
    1
  70. They were onsite within hours....
    1
  71. 34,500 gallons.....PER railroad car.
    1
  72. WE WON...but you can call that cheating all you like...lol.
    1
  73. It was that or let the whole thing explode at once....
    1
  74.  @yrevet  "That argument won out with Trump officials leaving regs up to the rail industry"....LOL. It was like Obamacare, Trump didn't care if it hurt people, he just wanted anything Obama passed, repealed. Try again.
    1
  75. Dude, get the hell out of there, at least for a while.
    1
  76. That is only the tip if the iceberg of what is beyond you...
    1
  77.  @cudafish9594  Thanks for another example.
    1
  78. Thank you for trying.
    1
  79. It was an accident.
    1
  80.  @shawnholey6976  OK then...wow.
    1
  81. "they" who?
    1
  82. It was a "controlled burn" rather than sitting back and waiting for an uncontrollable explosion to happen. It's what the experts thought was the safest way to deal with all those toxic chemicals. Their choices were extremely limited given the circumstances.
    1
  83. I believe there was a slow leak on one axle that allowed just those brakes to lock up, but the leak wasn't enough to engage the other axles on the train. At least that is just what I've read.
    1
  84. Such as?
    1
  85. Part of that is true....
    1
  86. Or perhaps it was an accident.
    1
  87. By whom?
    1
  88. I used to laugh at predictions like that, but not now....
    1
  89. This is a STATE issue....
    1
  90. Here's a question, what would you have done differently Tucker????
    1
  91. WE WON.
    1
  92. How come you choose to deflect from the story?
    1
  93. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems, but if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    1
  94. Thank you for pointing that out.
    1
  95. People vote for democrats because the DO CARE...and WE ARE THE MAJORITY.
    1
  96. It was an accident.
    1
  97. This is Fox, it was all over the other networks days ago.
    1
  98. How is this Joe's fault..? Grow up Jethro
    1
  99. Other news outlets are saying this is because Trump repealed an Obama era railroad safety regulation, requiring automatic braking systems. But if true, you'll never hear Tucker say that.
    1
  100. Be frightened, be very frightened....
    1
  101. Oh tisk, tisk...
    1
  102. On what charges?
    1
  103. Can anyone point out the last time Tucker AGREED with ANYTHING this administration has done? No? Then, I rest my case.
    1
  104. Perhaps you'd benefit from learning Spanish? It's not that difficult...
    1
  105.  @CanabisRevolution  Then what's your beef with your coworkers?
    1
  106. So is a political party, as we are currently witnessing.
    1
  107. Hey Tucker, not a single mention about your favorite president getting fined $110,000 dollars for defying a grand jury subpoena? I wonder why not???
    1
  108. Since you have access to the internet, Google is your friend.
    1
  109. It will remain in the ground and water supplies for decades....
    1
  110. You aren't laughing...
    1