Comments by "Daily Wire Third Stringer" (@DailyWireThirdStringer) on "Biden remarks on Judge Jackson's historic Supreme Court confirmation" video.
-
2
-
Biden: "What are Republicans for?"
I can answer that for you:
- More tax cuts for the rich
- Endless war
- Rampant corruption
- Voter suppression
- Cuts to the already miniscule social safety net (by developed standards)
- Wall Street deregulation and bailouts
- No environmental protections
- Hindering unionization efforts
- Nonstop distractions about culture war garbage (Dr. Seuss/Potato Head, Sexy M&M's, Critical Race Theory, transgender bathrooms)
- Obstructing any substantive material improvement in the lives of ordinary Americans (like healthcare, childcare, homecare, paid maternity leave, paid vacation time, liveable minimum wage, extended child tax credit, lower prescription drug costs, and student loan debt relief)
- Privatizing everything
- Defenestration of separation of church and state
- Government overreach into your personal business (mass surveillance, regulating your sex life, your anatomy, your intake of certain substances, etc.)
In other words: Everything that would objectively make the lives of ordinary working-class Americans worse. "lEt'S gO bRaNdOn" my @ss!!
1
-
Biden: "What are Republicans for?"
I can answer that for you:
- More tax cuts for the rich
- Endless war
- Rampant corruption
- Voter suppression
- Cuts to the already miniscule social safety net (by developed standards)
- Wall Street deregulation and bailouts
- No environmental protections
- Hindering unionization efforts
- Nonstop distractions about culture war garbage (Dr. Seuss/Potato Head, Sexy M&M's, Critical Race Theory, transgender bathrooms)
- Obstructing any substantive material improvement in the lives of ordinary Americans (like healthcare, childcare, homecare, paid maternity leave, paid vacation time, liveable minimum wage, extended child tax credit, lower prescription drug costs, and student loan debt relief)
- Privatizing everything
- Defenestration of separation of church and state
- Government overreach into your personal business (mass surveillance, regulating your sex life, your anatomy, your intake of certain substances, etc.)
In other words: Everything that would objectively make the lives of ordinary working-class Americans worse. "lEt'S gO bRaNdOn" my @ss!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
1
-
1
-
1