Comments by "Daily Wire Third Stringer" (@DailyWireThirdStringer) on "Supreme Court set to weigh case challenging Roe V. Wade" video.

  1. I defend the right of a woman to make decisions about HER OWN BODY, don't you?!! Or does "my body, my choice" only mean anything when it comes to government coercion to take life-saving vaccines?
    7
  2.  @amostlypeacefulmassshooting  The U.S. has the largest GDP per capita in the WORLD. The "population excuse" does not apply here. You'll have to do better than that.
    3
  3. You about you take responsibility by MINDING YOUR OWN F-CKING BUSINESS?!!
    2
  4. Amazing how these same so-called "pro-lifers" have absolutely NOTHING to say about the slaughtering of pigs and cows by the millions, which causes INFINITELY more suffering than all the abortions every committed in American history. How do you justify such cognitive dissonance in your mind? I'm genuinely curious. I intend to study this most peculiar phenomenon from a scientific perspective, and I need first-hand data to devise some explanation.
    2
  5.  thislittlepiggy oi  We don't call ourselves "pro-life" --- that's the difference.
    1
  6. The Constitution protects no such thing. The "right to life" is in the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. Your ignorance of the Founding documents of this nation automatically disqualify your opinions from serious consideration.
    1
  7. If I had to take I guess, I would say it will be a 5-4 split decision to uphold Roe (or keep most of it intact), even with a strong conservative majority. John Roberts almost always votes on the side of precedent, and I think it's likely Neil Gorsuch will join him. If they don't, frankly I find it ridiculous that 3 unelected bureaucrats can overrule the preferences of three-quarters of the American population based on little more than superstition. Any sane person would call that a theocracy. If there's a good secular argument for outlawing abortion before roughly 15-18 weeks (when the fetus has a nervous system developed to feel pain), I haven't heard it (and neither has my favorite living philosopher, Peter Singer). It also doesn't help that all three of the appointments of the new conservative justices were controversial (the Republican Senate blocked Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland for almost a year and then approved Gorsuch, Kavanaugh was accused of s-xual assualt, and Barrett was nominated one month before an election, directly contradicting what Republicans like Lindsey Graham were promising back in 2016). If they overturn Roe, there will be unrest like we have never seen since the election of Donald Trump --- but even worse. Most Americans see this folly for what it is, and (rightly) reject the intrusion of theology and religious dogma into the very personal decisions of women about their own anatomy.
    1