Comments by "Daily Wire Third Stringer" (@DailyWireThirdStringer) on "" video.

Mark used the same username in each and every one of his accounts (minisoldr), gave specific biographical details that align precisely with his personal life (e.g. the year he got married) using these accounts, provided a location that matched exactly where he resided at the time (Greensboro, NC), and -- here's the clincher -- uses the SAME EMAIL ADDRESS to create each account, which his campaign has already confirmed as his personal email. The evidence against him is rock-solid. Sorry. 😂
5
Mark used the same username in each and every one of his accounts (minisoldr), gave specific biographical details that align precisely with his personal life (e.g. the year he got married) using these accounts, provided a location that matched exactly where he resided at the time (Greensboro, NC), and -- here's the clincher -- uses the SAME EMAIL ADDRESS to create each account, which his campaign has already confirmed as his personal email. The evidence against him is rock-solid.
2
Keep in mind, Mark used the same username in each and every one of his accounts (minisoldr), gave specific biographical details that align precisely with his personal life (e.g. the year he got married) using these accounts, provided a location that matched exactly where he resided at the time (Greensboro, NC), and -- here's the clincher -- used the SAME EMAIL ADDRESS to create each account, which his campaign has already confirmed as his personal email. Sorry Brandon, but there's no escaping this one. The evidence against him is rock-solid, and he's on track for a Doug Mastriano-level loss, if not more. I would be extremely worried if I were the Trump campaign, given his full-throated endorsement (which he has yet to rescind) and lavish praise for this man. What's with Republicans propping up the most psychotic, far-right nutjobs against incumbent male Jewish attorney generals in battleground states anyway?
2
You vote for candidates who have openly expressed support for N@zism, sl@very, stripping away a woman's right to vote, treating LGBTQ+ people as sub-human, and the m-rder of fellow citizens ("some people just need k*llin," his words not mine), and yet you wonder why us non-freaks say that you are on the wrong side of history. 😂
1
The party of "law and order" sure does love itself a convicted felon. 😂
1
It has: he's a psycho. And that's not even including his previous comments that were on the record. You vote for candidates who have openly expressed support for N@zism/Holoc@ust denial, sl@very, stripping away a woman's right to vote, treating LGBTQ+ people as sub-human, and the m-rder of fellow citizens ("some people just need k*llin," his words not mine), and yet you wonder why us non-freaks say that you are on the wrong side of history. 😂
1
You're telling me this doesn't fit with the guy who has openly expressed support for N@zism/Holoc@ust denial, sl@very, stripping away a woman's right to vote, treating LGBTQ+ people as sub-human, and the m-rder of fellow citizens ("some people just need k*llin," his words not mine)? Seriously? 😂
1
You vote for candidates who have openly expressed support for N@zism, sl@very, stripping away a woman's right to vote, treating LGBTQ+ people as sub-human, and the m-rder of fellow citizens ("some people just need k*llin," his words not mine), and yet you wonder why us non-freaks say that you are on the wrong side of history. 😂
1
You vote for candidates who have openly expressed support for N@zism/Holoc@ust denial, sl@very, stripping away a woman's right to vote, treating LGBTQ+ people as sub-human, and the m-rder of fellow citizens ("some people just need k*llin," his words not mine), and yet you wonder why us non-freaks say that you are on the wrong side of history. 😂
1