Comments by "Daily Wire Third Stringer" (@DailyWireThirdStringer) on "Progressive Appears on Daily Wire, It Doesn't Go Well" video.

  1. We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What Michael is missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. Michael seems to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
    1