Comments by "Blaze 114" (@blaze1148) on "Metatron" channel.

  1.  @skrounst  I would say from all the points bought up by this video I would conclude: Real: 90% Forgery: 9% Another man: 1% Just think of the effort and technology needed to create a forgery that leaves an imprint only on the top two layers of the should...we are talking microns here....forgeries in those times would of been crude and simple consisting mainly of dyes and paints. The exactly death of Jesus was written in detail and it matches extremely closely with what we see in the Shroud....again a forgery of this level of sophistication would be extremely difficult in the 14 Century.
    10
  2. That is exactly why I have big suspicions about Dr Greer.
    5
  3.  @chemical-or9  I can absolutely understand that - you have to be able not only to lie and keep a straight face but to also keep a secret to reach high places in society....it sucks but it's true.
    4
  4.  @McJorneil  I'm not so sure.
    3
  5.  @classicnosh  If you are not a liar you cannot become an MP in the UK.
    3
  6. I think the actual process of carbon dating is flawed.
    2
  7.  @jeffreyerwin3665  .....the process of the readings may be correct but the interpretations of those readings are not.....there are many problems with Carbon Dating as an accurate measurement of date predictions in general....but what can be deduced from the detailed study of the Shroud without carbon dating validation is: 1. The Flax weave is the same as used in the area of Judea in the 1st century AD as corroborated by cloth of that time period. 2. Pollen found in the fibres corresponds with plants found specifically in the Judea region at that time. 3. The markings on the shroud correspond with written texts extremely accurately. 4. No paint or other substances were found in/on the fibres which would point to a forgery. 5. The actual creation of the image on the cloth has no known mechanism. 6. It would be extremely unlikely that a different individual of the same time period, under the same circumstances would have the exact same injuries as stated in the ancient texts that describe Jesus's crucifixion and subsequent resurrection. As accurate as you may think carbon dating is there is no real need for it other than to prove a general span of dates which the Shroud may have been produced give or take a few hundred years....but even if CD was accurate within a year or two the other evidence alone would point to the genuine burial cloth of Christ. I think this is the shroud of Christ 100% even without Carbon Dating.
    2
  8. You need to include some graphics or pictures to make your videos more interesting.....you are quite a good speaker but this is just a bit one dimensional for me.
    1
  9.  @coachjonjiujitsu  Not us anyways - but have for probably 65% of the population....because they are dumb MSM addicts.
    1