Youtube comments of Blaze 114 (@blaze1148).
-
234
-
92
-
86
-
85
-
80
-
77
-
72
-
70
-
70
-
65
-
62
-
54
-
49
-
47
-
46
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
27
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@kellysummersgill704
...look at the facts Kelly - i'm not suggesting there is no virus but the hysteria surrounding it is totally unjustified....
Shutting down the whole world for a 0.1% fatality rate - if you believe the figures portrayed in the Media [which I don't] it is actually much less than 0.1%.....misdiagnosis is huge when it comes to Covid-19 deaths - fact.
World Pop: 7.53 Billion
Number of World Infections: 1,000,249
Number of Worldwide Deaths: 51,515
This equals a worldwide Covid-19 death rate of: 0.0068%
Average Flu death rate per year is 750,000......Covid-19 won't get close to this.
Covid-19 is the focus of headlines but seasonal influenza has almost certainly claimed more lives this year. The flu is estimated to kill between 290,000 and 650,000 people worldwide each year, including about 17,000 in Britain. Covid-19 has been linked to more than 9,300 deaths so far and there have been nearly 230,000 confirmed cases.
Isolate the vulnerable and let the rest of us get on with our lives and livelihoods - the hysteria surrounding Covid-19 is far more damaging than the virus itself.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/12-experts-questioning-coronavirus-panic/5707532
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
.....and you are solidly in that herd....
...do you know anyone with Covid-19....is there any footage of the thousands being treated......I haven't seen any.
Shutting down the whole world for a 0.1% fatality rate....wake the f*** up.
if you believe the figures portrayed in the Media [which I don't] it is actually much less than 0.1%.....misdiagnosis is huge when it comes to Covid-19 deaths - fact.
World Pop: 7.53 Billion
Number of World Infections: 1,000,249
Number of Worldwide Deaths: 51,515
This equals a worldwide Covid-19 death rate of: 0.0068%
Average Flu death rate per year is 750,000......Covid-19 won't get close to this.
Covid-19 is the focus of headlines but seasonal influenza has almost certainly claimed more lives this year. The flu is estimated to kill between 290,000 and 650,000 people worldwide each year, including about 17,000 in Britain. Covid-19 has been linked to more than 9,300 deaths so far and there have been nearly 230,000 confirmed cases.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/12-experts-questioning-coronavirus-panic/5707532
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The proof of this is that the amount of deaths in 2019/2020, are commensurate to the figures for flu deaths logged in 2018/19.
If people were really dying of flu and also of COVID19, there should have been a clear and visible increase in fatalities, but there's not. The authorities have now realized this and are now classifying almost all deaths, (heart attacks, cancer, accidents etc.), as coronavirus related in an effort to raise the COVID19 death total above the flu deaths total.
We are being lied to by the media, television, CDC, the WHO and world governments every day... They are brainwashing billions of people around the world, forcing them into lockdown and terrifying them out of their wits with their constant daily scaremongering of this fabricated 'killer' coronavirus.
Hard working people are losing their jobs and/or livelihoods and the world economy is going to take a massive hit because of this lie. And guess who is going to suffer the most?
Don’t trust the governments or the media and TV propaganda. Do your own research people, and wake yourselves up to this con. Or the next stage is likely to be enforced Vaccinations…
People are sleep walking into a sinister Police State set up not by Elected Governments but by Technocracies [Bill Gates et al] where you will be tracked, controlled and selectively terminated at will.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Shutting down the whole world for a 0.1% fatality rate....wake the f*** up.
if you believe the figures portrayed in the Media [which I don't] it is actually much less than 0.1%.....misdiagnosis is huge when it comes to Covid-19 deaths - fact.
World Pop: 7.53 Billion
Number of World Infections: 1,000,249
Number of Worldwide Deaths: 51,515
This equals a worldwide Covid-19 death rate of: 0.0068%
Average Flu death rate per year is 750,000......Covid-19 won't get close to this.
Covid-19 is the focus of headlines but seasonal influenza has almost certainly claimed more lives this year. The flu is estimated to kill between 290,000 and 650,000 people worldwide each year, including about 17,000 in Britain. Covid-19 has been linked to more than 9,300 deaths so far and there have been nearly 230,000 confirmed cases.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/12-experts-questioning-coronavirus-panic/5707532
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Atomism is a non starter....light being a particle doesn't explain the double slit experiment or 'action at a distance'
Light is not:
1. A particle
2. A wave
3. A wave particle/duality
4. An emission
5. Nor does light have a speed
As Tesla said - "Light is a sound wave in the Aether".
Light in short is a coaxial circuit. Light is not a material emanation or projection, rather a sheer induction containing two axial and one longitudinal/radial components. By true definition, the very nature of all electromagnetism is a split wheel (like a vortex antenna) as is the co-axial circuit of light. Spacial electrical and magnetic components induce each other via the diaelectric center axial and radial point.
ATOMISM:
Atomism is a pseudo-religious belief system of materialism/particle-hierarchy born from Democritus and some others since ancient times. Current belief systems of unreality such as relativity and quantum are just re-badged Atomism. Atomism at its core is pure base and vile materialism which both ignores and rejects to define all which is, that being the terms field and energy. Likewise, the rejection of Atomism is not the rejection of particles in the atomic nucleus, rather the irrational belief system of Atomism which cannot define a field or energy and assumes all reactions are either colliding particles or 'warped space-time', of which this position is both illogical, impossible, senseless and not supported in observed phenomena. Only two foundations of ultimate reality have every been forwarded since the dawn of time; one being the Aether and the other being Atomism.
Rational physics exists only due to metaphysical principles and as such Atomism/Materialism is an intellectually bankrupt belief system lacking in wisdom, common sense and utterly rejected by the full spectrum of all of history's persons of wisdom. Also Atomism/Quantum is humorously called the 'cult of bumping particles' and concept reification fallacies such as (loved by Hollywood and science fiction) 'curved/warped space-time'. Nikola Tesla vociferously spoke against this insanity at great length....
"The Scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane" - N.Tesla
ENERGY:
Energy is the Aether, often confused with the dissipation or diminution of energy as manifest which is the impotency of energy. No branch of science has explained what energy is, they have no idea, they have only defined the parameters for it but not explained the term energy. From the perspective of the Absolute energy follows 1/Phi^-3, or the intrinsic nature of the Absolute to which since times beginning it has been asked"why anything rather than nothing at all?". Debating over kinetic vs potential is futile since nobody on Earth can accurately define the term energy to any persons satisfaction.
The bulk quantification of energy units no sooner explains energy than is can define what energy is. Energy is the potential to do work and cause change or in the absolute sense is the prime mover of phenomena. However this prime mover must 1st be in and of counterspace of wholly a non-Cartesian rest where all methods of measure and quantification are futile. It is far more simple for humanity to replace the word energy with the word field.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@g.gorrell2088 Lets just use some intelligent logic shall we and nail this lack of crater under the LM issue down 100% - I will address the other issues later because wow there are many !
Lets take your silly analogy of do you park your car with the gas peddle mashed to the floor? - the last time I looked cars were not driven by their exhausts and the last time I looked the LM didn't have brakes to slow it's momentum but I digress.....lets make your analogy a little more relevant shall we and take a medium sized family saloon [similar weight - which is still an issue even @ 1/6th gravity] stand it upright with between 1,000 and 10,000 pounds of thrust - going through say two exhaust pipes either side to give more stability.
1. Do you think you need more or less thrust in a thinner atmosphere ?
2. Does this thrust reach the surface easier in a rarefied or thicker atmosphere ?
3. Do you think you need to increase or decrease the aforementioned thrust the nearer you get to the landing surface ?
4. Do you think being a far thinner atmosphere [and 1/6th gravity of Earth] any dust on the surface would be dislodged.
from the surface more easily ?
5. Do you think with the extremely flimsy construction of the LM it would be preferable to land on a hard or soft surface ?
6. Lets put the inertia question again....1/6th gravity only affects weight and not mass so would the inertia be the same as on Earth ?
7. As shown on the official NASA footage a large amount of dust can be seen to be disturbed from the surface - where was that from ?
8. Do we see a hard regolith under the LM or a grainy dusty surface ?
How would you explain the fact that there were 16 maneuvering rocket nozzles on the lunar module (4, as crosses, on each superior vortex of it) and there is not a single footage of them firing although you can see the vehicle maneuvering in space (yaw, pitch and roll)?. How would you explain a computer so basic as that in the LM (with less computer power than a hp financial calculator of the 80s) controlling all 16 thrusters as a fly by wire aircraft of this days? Nasa, formally claims that all the digit crunching for the maneuvering thrusters were done on earth and then sent to the LM, but there is a problem on that, there is a 1.6 seconds delay between the earth and the moon, so it its an impossible answer. How would you explain the fact that about the flying earth simulator of the LM there is only one footage, where it failed and almost killed Neil Armstrong, no single film of it being controlled successfully. Think about it.
Other LM/CM musings ....
What I was wondering was how was their command module and lander able to morph from a cavernous ship large enough for astronauts to do flips in zero G while someone filmed them from 7 feet away to a relatively small space diagram with every inch packed with huge tanks needed to carry out the mission? Some depict the astronauts packed in the ship so tight there wasn't room for another member to a spacious ship able to stage filming the earth supposedly with the camera right up against the glass. Then all of a sudden you see arms and bodies coming between the camera and the glass 185,000 miles from the earth. Hearing them discussing how to get a realistic shot as the cabin lighting is restored to show they were actually shooting the shot from 6 or 7 feet away from the window as they removed the transparency film from the window along with the curved black material they used to fix unacceptable parallax egg shape error caused by the thickness of the window from top to its bottom while shooting from a distance on an angle. The curved black material fixed the error perfectly making it look like the earth terminator line between night and day in their fraudulent video of the earth. They bragged about their clever technique and how their "LIVE" shot will be perfect for playback! Then there is the scientific evidence of their missions impossibility I figured out myself today. The average man at rest requires 19 cubic feet of pure oxygen per 24 hours scrubbers or no scrubbers once you figure in the atmospheric pure oxygen percentage, amount consumed by the metabolism and amount exhaled after. That gives you 19 cubic feet X 3 men leaves you needing 57 cubic feet to sustain a 3 man crews actual metabolism at rest! NASA switched to a 35% oxygen mix after the horrific accident with Gus Grissom and 2 other souls. That translates to their voyage now requiring 171 cubic feet of 34% mixed gas per day. Multiply that by 10 1/2 days you have 1795 cubic feet of 34% oxygen mixed gas-actually needed if they were at REST!! NASA claims only 73 cubic feet of gas per day. The Apollo tanks were only pressurized to 200 bars pressure due to the added strain of launch and vacuum of space. Using Boyle's Law 1795 cubic feet at 200 bar requires a 131.93 cubic foot tank at 2900 PSI ! That's not even considering the oxygen consumed by the 2KW fuel cell the lunatics claimed produced 56 gallons of potable water a day!.....they would need 96.96 cubic feet of air per gallon x 56 gallon a day is 5429.76 cubic feet of air to produce that 56 gallons of water per day X 10 days = 5429.76 extra cubic feet of air per 10 day mission just for that fuel cell water production so add another 285 cubic feet to the breathing figure and you need a 417 cubic foot tank at 200 bar!! Add in the fuel, oxidizer, helium and nitrogen tanks and you got !!!! Nobody's doing flips for the camera man 6 feet away!
By far and away, the best arguments for debunking the moon landing(s) are thermodynamic, audible, and footprint. There is only one way to explain Armstrong's audibles upon descent in a pressurized mag/aluminium can with 140 - 150 dB rocket engine noise in the immediate environment - Bose noise cancelling earphones and, er, uh, microphone! And for anyone who has ever worked in 100C+ worksite in a protective, pressurized suit, well knows that cooled air is vital for survival. In the absence of such a cooled air tank, the power pack needed to cool the air in the suit would have to have exceeded several thousand joules per hour, which would require batteries/power plant roughly equal in size to the LM itself. (Remember Apollo 13? - the movie?) And for anyone moderately experienced in rocketry, the ground around the blast/ground contact area WILL BE COMPLETELY DUST FREE - atmosphere or not as the blast constitutes its own atmosphere. Great visual, but total farce. Kudos to Kubrick for getting almost everything else right, the dream lives on in what might have been, and what still might be. So much of life exists in the "what could have been" that there is no need for disparaging one of the better intentioned fairy tales.
Does Rocketry actually Work in the Vacuum? [made very simple]
The reason space travel is not possible is because the systems we claim to use to propel a rocket through space operate on gas pressure and there is no gas pressure in space.
Gas pressure requires molecules to be in contact with each other, bouncing off each other, causing millions of collisions per second, etc… If you release gas into the vacuum of space, the first molecule that pops out will shoot off into the distance at a constant speed, so will the one behind that, never catching up with the first one. The third, fourth, etc… all fly off into the distance trying to fill the vacuum by finding their empty corner. So no matter how much gas you produce none of it will ever change the pressure under a space ship. None it if will ever push a spaceship. To push a spaceship there must be some locally high pressure under it, which is impossible since the pressure in space is 0 everywhere.
Back the the Nozzle and the Massflow equation F=MA on earth
Think about a fire hose shooting water. A force comes directly back against the column of water shooting out. Why? Because the first drop of water has to pass through air, which is dense, causing many collisions, slowing down the drop of water. The second drop, directly behind the first, will not be slowed down by the air so it will collide with the first drop, the third drop hits the second drop and so on, the fast water coming through the hose pushing through the slower water outside causes Newton’s 3rd Law to push back on the column of water. This is why you need people holding the hose to add an unbalanced force otherwise the hose would not be able to push water through that column anymore, the water column would be diverted and the hose would flop around. It is obvious that one drop of water does not push back on the hose, you need a fast moving column.
The nozzle and the Massflow equation in space
Since the molecules leaving the combustion chamber and entering the vacuum never slow down, never collide with any outside objects, nor with each other, their force is always moving forward, away from the ship. There is no way for that force to be returned to the ship. There is no way for the force of the moving molecules to be extracted and used for propulsion. Their force is carried off into the far corners of space. This is also known as Joule Expansion. Remember that as soon as the nozzle is opened, the combustion chamber becomes part of the vacuum of space as is subject to its laws. A closed chamber is under pressure but not an open one.
According to your physics there should of been a larger crater under the LM than the hole you have dug yourself into.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@F.O.O
...do you know anyone with Covid-19....is there any footage of the thousands being treated......I haven't seen any.
Shutting down the whole world for a 0.1% fatality rate....wake the f*** up.
if you believe the figures portrayed in the Media [which I don't] it is actually much less than 0.1%.....misdiagnosis is huge when it comes to Covid-19 deaths - fact.
World Pop: 7.53 Billion
Number of World Infections: 1,000,249
Number of Worldwide Deaths: 51,515
This equals a worldwide Covid-19 death rate of: 0.0068%
Average Flu death rate per year is 750,000......Covid-19 won't get close to this.
Covid-19 is the focus of headlines but seasonal influenza has almost certainly claimed more lives this year. The flu is estimated to kill between 290,000 and 650,000 people worldwide each year, including about 17,000 in Britain. Covid-19 has been linked to more than 9,300 deaths so far and there have been nearly 230,000 confirmed cases.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/12-experts-questioning-coronavirus-panic/5707532
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Emma May
.....total and utter BS....
In Cavendish we do not have an attraction that we can explain as only apparent. It is not geometric only. No curvature can explain it, since it exhibits not only motion but real force. The force on the torsion wire is not only apparent. It is a real force. This causes any mechanically inclined person to have fits. It should cause curved space people to have fits, but they aren’t terribly honest with themselves. Only those who have some connection to expansion theories really take this question as seriously as it should be taken. Not only because it is a real thorn to expansion theories, and always has been; but because it is a real thorn to anyone who thinks physics is mechanics and only mechanics. Anyone who demands a real physical explanation of physics must get stuck here, since physics itself is stuck here, and has been since Newton.
There is a two-part answer to this, and the first part is that although gravity is not a force, it is certainly capable of creating a force. In other papers I have shown that logically, gravity is most efficiently explained by expansion, both as a matter of math and of theory. In the first instance, this makes the attraction only apparent and the diminishing distance only geometric. Gravity is a three-dimensional acceleration, and we already knew this from the nature of g. The dimensions of that constant are the dimensions of acceleration, not force. However, we also know that any acceleration can create a force, and gravity is no exception.
A proton expanding into the void is only geometric. But in the real world we have no voids. In the real world a proton or planet expanding gravitationally is not only geometric, since it may be expanding in an atmosphere or, at least, an electromagnetic field. The expansion of the sphere, at whatever level, is certainly capable of exerting pressure on whatever it meets--whether another body or atmosphere or field. If the expanding sphere could not create a force, then the acceleration would be physically meaningless. To have an acceleration without a force, you would have to postulate an infinitely collapsible shell of the sphere. All matter would be inter-penetrable. That is to say, all matter would be a ghost; all matter would no longer be matter. All your “something” would thereby become “nothing.” Acceleration implies that you have a something to accelerate. The verb implies the noun, requires it. Acceleration of an infinitely collapsible shell would not really be acceleration, would it?
That said, it still does not explain Cavendish. If we explain gravity as real expansion, then we must see that we have two spheres, both hung, and both of which want to expand toward the other. If they were unconstrained and in a void, they would do so, and the bigger one would do most of the real moving. That is to say, it would do most of the actual eating up of the space in between, since it has the greater acceleration. But that is not the situation we have. We, the observers, are getting bigger at the same rate as the balls, so we don’t see them expand. Beyond that, we have all sorts of constraints on the motion of the balls. The large ball is constrained by Cavendish himself: the machine includes a stabilizer that prevents the large balls from moving. And the smaller ball is constrained by air resistance, the twisting tension on its wire, and the inertia of its twin (in ascending order, we assume). Since gravity is a motion outward from the center, the smaller ball could certainly express a force against air resistance or air pressure. But it would do that in all directions equally. If it were free to move, it would push the air between it and the large ball away, and move closer, but it is not free to expand into that space. It is constrained by the apparatus from doing so. The apparatus expands just like the spheres and you and me. It therefore constantly creates more space in between the balls, automatically. The big problem is that we must assume the wire is connected to the center of the ball, and the center of the ball is not affected by expansion. Even if we admit that the wire was probably attached to the top middle of the ball, that still doesn’t help us. Expansion cannot work against either the torsion or the moment of inertia, no matter how you express them in your equations. This is all to say that expansion can push, but it can’t pull. It can create real forces, but not pulling forces. A pulling force is equivalent to an attraction, and is logically impossible.
http://milesmathis.com/caven.html
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's ironic that pharmacists kill many more people than food companies do.....late 14c., farmacie, "a medicine that rids the body of an excess of humors (except blood);" also "treatment with medicine; theory of treatment with medicine," from Old French farmacie "a purgative" (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek pharmakeia "a healing or harmful medicine, a healing or poisonous herb; a drug, poisonous potion; magic (potion), dye, raw material for physical or chemical processing."
This is from pharmakeus (fem. pharmakis) "a preparer of drugs, a poisoner, a sorcerer" from pharmakon "a drug, a poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1