Comments by "Winston Smith" (@kryts27) on "A military think tank’s comprehensive geopolitical plan for Xi Jinping" video.

  1. I have doubts that North Korea can field 100,000 troops even in a year. All these soldiers will need logistics supplying from Russia and North Korea. NK is very poor (even in the army, thanks to the narcissistic corruption by 7 decades of Kims), and Russia gives them very basic and insufficient rations such as food, water and medical supplies. Furthermore, NK soldiers are not trained or equipped in combating drones and will be in a deadly battlefield space in Ukraine. They will be cannon fodder only, which is Russia's real intention and a win for China (as Kim Jong-un will be snubbed by his allies by his failings, and China thinks NK is getting too uppity). However, when the NK soldiers realize this, they might revolt on the borders of Russia and Ukraine, complicating all stakes for the Russians.
    5
  2. "Swift and intense assult?" There is 3 US carrier groups now in the Western Pacific within less than 4 days warplane range of the Taiwan Strait (without Japan's initial help). Taiwan won't fall in 4 days of an amphibious assult, after which the PLAAN loses more and more ships, making logistic supply impossible. Has the 3-3-16 not learned the lesson of Russia in Ukraine? Plus an amphibious assult is 5 times more difficult to pull off than a land border assult.
    1
  3. Whatever the 3-3-16 does, it is not "carefully constructed" but creates rearmament in it's opponents. Particularly, in South-East Asia with the exception of Myamar, Thailand and Laos (not sure why Thailand). Trump may be a bit cool about defending Taiwan, but all the US military don't want Taiwan to fall to the 3-3-16, the geopolitical results of that is far too serious.
    1