Comments by "Winston Smith" (@kryts27) on "Feli from Germany" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. It's good that the education about World War 2 in Germany is about concentration camps and the political effects of the Nazis, and less about battles and the arms technology race between Nazi Germany and their enemies, which is interesting but not very instructive of the political side in which wartime scientist or engineer did what, or how good tanks and planes were etc. This topic diverts from the political effect if the Nazis, and the biographies of the main henchmen in the Nazi government, as well as Hitler. The brutal and primeval ideology of Nazism is uncovered aa well as it should be, and this only reflects credit in young Germans in daring to analyse their dark past, as well as the good side of German culture under men like Beethoven, Bach and Kant (i'm sure we can uncover German women participating in the German Enlightenment as well). Studying the Nazis also leads to other totaitarian powers and how awful and brutal they were too; like Stalin in the Soviet Union and his predessesors, Trotsky and Lenin. Also war is never simplistically about the "good guys" and the "bad guys". The Anglo-Americans were not good guys, but initially beseiged governments who wished to survive the onslaught and later to win. To do this they were prepared to kill about 600,000 German civilians by mass bombing so as to weaken Nazi Germany's war effort. This is not a moral act (no wars really were and are). The fire bombing of Dresden probably was a war crime on a city that was not a primary military and economic target (it did not have the factories and docks that Hamburg had as an example). So countries that waged war against the Nazis (and also the home islands of Japan) also bear some guilt and responsibilites for their actions as well (Hiroshima and Nagasaki).
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. It's good that young Germans are acknowledging their past (first half) twentieth century history, pretty well warts and all. Valid though the criticisms are that not enough was examined where Germany was not engaged in World War 2, such as in Eastern Asia and the Pacific, where the Showa Japanese German allies were doing some pretty terrible atrocities as well (against Asian people, mainly Chinese and against Western allies POWs in defiance of the Geneva Convention). No one particularly likes to read about atrocities of the past, even if their nation were not directly engaged in it, but we should be informed truthfully about it. I have to add an Anglo-American revision of the war that the bombing of Dresden was military unnecessary (it didn't have much industry) and was possibly a war crime (although this is my opinion as a non-German amateur historian), as possibly also was the fire bombing of Tokyo in March 1945 (although Tokyo had plenty of industry and was more of a legitimate target). In some defence of the Allies, the Gauleiter of Dresden was a corrupt official and failed to install even basic anti-aircraft defence, such as sufficient barrage balloons, spotlights and flak guns, leaving the city defenceless. The Western Allies were not "good guys" either during WW2, but initially beleaguered and desperate governments that took drastic measures to win the war. The lesson to take home here is the terrible and deadly effect of totalitarian governments, wherever they are and whatever their political creed (for example, the Soviet Union under Stalin).
    1
  13. 1