Comments by "B. Xoit" (@b43xoit) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. Departing at "gender".
    1
  2. Nothing wrong with moving on, but it still has to be behavioral. Intelligence is as intelligence does.
    1
  3. Isn't cosmic, or isn't radiation?
    1
  4. For one thing, because E is not conceptually the same as G. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy
    1
  5. The question was, how can a system that is unpredictable in the short term be predictable in the long term.
    1
  6. Nuclear heat can crack water.
    1
  7. If I understand correctly, which I am far from certain of, Susskind is saying that entanglement explains measurement. Measurement is entanglement between the particle under measurement and those of the measuring apparatus.
    1
  8. Why wouldn't value judgments exist?
    1
  9. This is plausible. Maybe he never paid much attention to the social world and all the info about scams.
    1
  10. All scientific efforts and money should be redirected toward trying to solve overshoot.
    1
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_crystal
    1
  12. What is happening to the glaciers?
    1
  13. Do the neutronics work out?
    1
  14. I replied to this question above.
    1
  15. For those who want SI measurements, an hour is 3600s.
    1
  16. Falsifiable? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
    1
  17. A good word to practice for it is "Frau".
    1
  18.  @dlevi67  How would a successful theory of quantum gravity make anything about the interior of a BH (other than mass, charge, and spin) observable?
    1
  19.  @dlevi67  I think that when scientists say "observable", they mean people or machines or other animals or other gross objects capable of processing data can obtain data about the matter. So for example if you build a photon detector, you can observe whether an electron emits a photon when you subject it to a strong magnetic field applied in a given spatial direction. Being able to reason or speculate about configurations said to exist behind a curtain is not what is normally meant by "observation". << It could (and should) however enable us to make and test different predictions on the behaviour of black holes. >>-- would the "behavior" be observable? If I understand correctly, the "no hair" theorem shows that nothing about BH "behavior" will become any more complex than is determined by charge, angular momentum, and mass.
    1
  20. Practically none, unless indirectly from the gases released from making the things (and disposing of them after the end of their usefulness) and powering the stations. It's a matter of scale.
    1
  21. How many millihitlers is Biden's level of evil?
    1
  22. How can it break if it was never working in the first place?
    1
  23. Old English had "iren" and "isen" (synonyms). But I don't know the genders, therefore, I don't really know the nouns.
    1
  24. 2ºR increase
    1
  25.  @guillermoa.nerygomez8782  2º F is 461.67 R, therefore a 2º F change is a change of 461.67 R, since you can always substitute equals for equals.
    1
  26.  @guillermoa.nerygomez8782  It wouldn't hurt when talking about changes or differences to use K and R so as to avoid confusion and mistakes.
    1
  27.  @guillermoa.nerygomez8782  Your stance against the rule that you can substitute equals for equals is illogical and antisemantic.
    1
  28. To the best of my understanding, Einstein's thought about detection of gravitational waves was just that he thought that people wouldn't overcome the engineering challenges in making sufficiently sensitive instruments. That is different from saying there is no theoretically detectable phenomenon, which is the position of multiverse proponents.
    1
  29. Its within possibility that they survive but cause the deaths of thousands by spreading the virus.
    1
  30. There is too much action that exacerbates global heating.
    1
  31. There's no way to test your prediction. Therefore, it is morally equivalent to religion.
    1
  32. Maybe you have an extreme case of "face blindness." I believe I have it to a mild degree.
    1
  33. No one knows what "actually" underlies the fact that the wave math predicts the probabilities (relative frequencies) of outcomes.
    1
  34. Same number, not same amount.
    1
  35. Venuformed, as another commenter says.
    1
  36. What "they" have been so telling people?
    1
  37. Show me a curve of sea ice over the last 10 years.
    1
  38. So if I'm standing on the surface of the Earth close to sea level, the thing that slows time for me is my upward acceleration on account of the force from the ground pushing up on my feet?
    1
  39. Photoelectric effect.
    1
  40. Something quantum.
    1
  41. Maybe some of the particles weren't created, but have always been here? There was a notion of "tachyons", which would always be on the other side of the barrier (not able to slow to the speed of light), but there is no evidence that such a thing is real.
    1
  42. If Youtube is going to spend some time on improving the code, then what would be more useful would be a search facility over the comments. Also, something to discourage people repeating comments that have already been offered.
    1
  43. << they will just brush it aside >> yes, well, that goes to the need for better teaching about philosophy.
    1
  44. Which square root?
    1
  45. Yes, and Trumpsters may not recognize it, but their "thought" and behavior is quite newage, to rhyme with "sewage."
    1
  46. You are not alone.
    1
  47. Neutrinos do not come out of black holes.
    1
  48. I think someone said she has.
    1
  49. "...what we should do about climate change" -- How can we do anything about it if we don't take power?
    1
  50. Does entanglement solve the measurement problem?
    1