Youtube comments of SkyRiver (@SkyRiver1).

  1. 767
  2. 232
  3. 220
  4. 213
  5. 176
  6. 161
  7. 161
  8. 139
  9. 137
  10. 102
  11. 88
  12. 83
  13. 70
  14. 70
  15. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The Americdan Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    68
  16. 67
  17. IMHO the most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 16 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell, but I kinda doubt it, according to Wikipedia it's range is 18 miles. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it and now the Germans have too. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada, but they pale in comparison to the capabilities of the German Panzerhaubitzen 2000 that the Dutch and Germans are supplying (unfortunately in extremely limited numbers). See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_DS6UvZXPo&t=148s The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, -- baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. This would be a truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vIPNElDkns&t=38s Estimates by Rand and other think tanks estimate that Russia has already used more than 70% of their advanced guided missiles in Ukraine and they will not be able to replace them in a timely fashion. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common towed artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon tech they may no longer have access to. In any event, even if Russia should win in Ukraine, and realistically there is very good chance of this, Russia is totally screwed in the long term. See here to find out why Peter Zeihan finds this to be the case in one of his many videos on the Geopop YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwPMtmuuVNw&t=176s As he said, "A hypersonic missile without a nuclear warhead is just a very expensive way to blow up a building." Let's hope they keep up the stupidity they have been exhibiting in this area, with their "terror weapons".
    67
  18. 60
  19. 60
  20. 56
  21. 55
  22. 50
  23. 49
  24. 48
  25. 45
  26. 44
  27. 43
  28. 43
  29. 43
  30. 42
  31. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The Americdan Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    40
  32. 39
  33. Prediction: We will figure out exactly how they cheated, then we will figure out the next way that they cheated, and the one after that, and so on: with a factual and rational narrative about the qualities of people who would do such things. We will even say, "They said it couldn't happen here.": out of ironic gallows humor. Maybe at times their cheating will be so outrageous that hundreds of thousand of people will march or occupy something, but amazingly, almost miraculously Mitch and Lindsey, and the rest of Caligula JR's little unholy Greek chorus will retain their offices, and they will go on cheating and bullying and claiming that the law is what ever they think it is at the moment. And we will figure it all out. We have known forever that it would be best to get all money out of politics if the most ethical and fair government is what you want. We have known forever that proportional representation is superior to winner-takes-all seesaws. We have known that the banks are incapable of regulating themselves and that the wealth of the nation is being sucked up by the military industrial professional political worker complex, that the drug war is a farce that has created the first billionaire criminal organizations. In our hollowed out lives, news has become entertainment. And the fantasyland they present to the public is a poor substitute for what should have been the golden destiny of mankind on earth and in regions beyond. Bernie understands that campaign funding is the lynch-pin for all the legalized corruption. That is why, I am willing to give up my AR15s, overlook my feelings about rewarding people for violating immigration regulations, and even bow out of opinions regarding abortion since I am not a woman and cannot put myself in the place of one considering such a decision. That is how fundamentally important campaign finance reform is to me and the future of the USA. It's not sexy but it is THE issue upon which the fair treatment of all other issues depend.
    37
  34. 37
  35. 36
  36. 35
  37. I tend to agree with you, but know that I shouldn't. One thing that history and even current events and especially the market demonstrates with such blinding proficiency that most are actually blind to it, is that NOBODY knows what the future actually holds in any meaningfully actionable detail -- some AI directed logarithms seem to come close in their high frequency arbitrage of the market or game play, but even they miss all the time in specific trades or moves. In the media you have a hundred voices that make various predictions based on diverse yet extremely limited perceived variables and then only the one or two voices that guessed most correctly are reported and remembered to any noteworthy degree. That's in the case of the actual future: in the many possible imaginary futures: predictions are easy because what "would have happened" is a non-result with a faulty equation used as a rationalization for it's generation. Nobody knows what -- would-have-happened-- if. And there is absolutely no way to confirm it one way or another. That's why it's so easy for us to think we are right about such imaginings. As an example: how many of our great planners and strategic thinkers predicted in the sixties that of all the populations on earth the communist Vietnamese would hold Americans in highest regard? Or that the Chinese, whom were so backward that they were attempting to produce steel as cottage industry and experiencing such famine that the people had stripped the bark off of trees for food would be a technological powerhouse? Or that some dumb-ass from Texas would destroy the American economy by attacking a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 based on manufactured "evidence", and trying to nation-build in the stupidest place to try to nation-build on earth (Afghanistan) so that his handler's former corporation could get those juicy cost-plus contracts?
    32
  38. 32
  39. 31
  40. 31
  41. 31
  42. 30
  43. 30
  44. 30
  45. 29
  46. 29
  47. 28
  48. 28
  49. 28
  50. 27
  51. 26
  52. 26
  53. 26
  54. 25
  55. 24
  56. 23
  57. 23
  58. 23
  59. 23
  60. 21
  61. 21
  62. 21
  63. 21
  64. 20
  65. 20
  66. 20
  67. 20
  68. 20
  69. 19
  70. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    19
  71. 19
  72. 18
  73. 18
  74. 18
  75. 18
  76. 18
  77. 18
  78. 17
  79. In the sixties we saw that "There is no problem until there is trouble." The power elite and their misanthropic syncopates are not only out of touch, they are objectively insane in their behavior and the policies they establish. We thirst for justice, and after the possibility of a golden future for mankind. But they have no thirst for justice -- because -- they write the legislation, and it has become a legislation of privilege and legalized crimes, that is ultimately enforced by low level sell-outs and authoritarian types who have a taste for using the petty authority granted to them to push people around, lie in court and get away with murder. Or at the very least, stand with the blue mob's code of omerta. Now people say, myself included, there are a lot of good cops. True that, but bad cops are just as common now, and the good cops ain't doin' shit about it. So functionally they are all pretty bad in total. I don't know about you, but I have never in my seventy years needed a cop for anything. I've reported thefts: nothing came of it. I have however gotten a few traffic tickets when I was young, for basically having a hot car and a pretty girl next to me. There was no need at all to break the law, they just were so full of hatred/envy -- Really. I was arrested for pot in college by an undercover scumbag that everyone knew was an undercover scumbag, who simply turned in drugs to a state narcotics officer and said I sold them to him. Like everyone else the scumbag did the same thing to, I was given the choice of pleading guilty and doing a few weeks in jail or facing over ten years in prison. I am not black, I was not poor, I didn't even have very long hair, which was a real reason for discrimination back then. When I was in high school I wore a black armband for the VietNam moratorium. I was told to leave school for the day. I went to a local dinner and a young off duty cop asked me why I wasn't in school. I told him and he threw me to the ground and started strangling me. Every cop I have ever seen testify in court, just out and out lied. They had it all written down, what didn't happen, with such impressive notes about times and what not I don't think that my experience is anomalous. I think it is pretty representative of most people. Now I just treat the police like they are all potentially violent insane people, who may or may not bite. Police in America is really, mostly an alternate venue of taxation. Almost all of us would be better off without them. Doesn't it cost more to imprison a man than to give him an ivy league education? Innocent men in prison is money in the bank for these reptilian brained psychotics, we call our leaders, the politician, and our real leaders, the politicians' owners. The banksters, and the hidden money, the insiders, the power elite. They are pretty much assholes. But they control the men with the guns. But not all of them, thanks to the second amendment.
    17
  80. 17
  81. 17
  82. 17
  83. 17
  84. I've seen photos of M549 HERA rounds, seemingly in use in Ukraine. This is the rocket assisted HE round. Still needs a bit of guidance to be Excalibur. Good to see something anyhow. Now if they only had some M1156 kits to go with the rocket assist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1156_Precision_Guidance_Kit IMHO the most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 16 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell, but I kinda doubt it, according to Wikipedia it's range is 18 miles. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it and now the Germans have too. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada, but they pale in comparison to the capabilities of the German Panzerhaubitzen 2000 that the Dutch and Germans are supplying (unfortunately in extremely limited numbers). See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_DS6UvZXPo&t=148s The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, -- baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. This would be a truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vIPNElDkns&t=38s Rand and other think tanks estimate that Russia has already used more than 70% of their advanced guided missiles in Ukraine and they will not be able to replace them in a timely fashion. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common towed artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon tech they may no longer have access to. In any event, even if Russia should win in Ukraine, and realistically there is very good chance of this, Russia is totally screwed in the long term. See here to find out why Peter Zeihan finds this to be the case in one of his many videos on the Geopop YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwPMtmuuVNw&t=176s As he said, "A hypersonic missile without a nuclear warhead is just a very expensive way to blow up a building." Let's hope they keep up the stupidity they have been exhibiting in this area, with their "terror weapons".
    16
  85. 16
  86. 16
  87. 16
  88. 15
  89. 15
  90. 15
  91. 15
  92. 15
  93. 15
  94. 15
  95. 15
  96. 15
  97. 14
  98. 14
  99. 14
  100. 14
  101. This bull. We will be looking back in twenty years and seeing just where the hysteria that ended in causing desperate people, to turn to street drugs to control their pain. And why? Because the media fell once again for the war mongers. War on this, war on that, let's have a war on war and realize once and for all, that the only countries that have had any success dealing with the drug thing are those that decriminalized drugs entirely. All drugs should be available to any adult who wants them. Who are you to raise such fake fears in a public that is still under the sway of the last generation of bull that made all these drugs illegal to begin with? All this will do is increase the heroin use. It is only natural that a bulge in the aging population will use more pain killers than when they were young. Canada uses much more opioids per person than the USA. You can buy codeine over the counter without a script. If you don't realize that by far the greatest part of the harm caused by drugs is caused by their illegal status, then you are really blind. Who would turn to street drugs if they could walk into a store and buy some tablets that were more euphoric and effective then heroin? What if people who pursue pain meds had them, and they were pure and effective without all the prisons and beatings and heartbreak? What if people who were really just trying to kill themselves because of the present economic hammering that the one percent is giving the world, were allowed to kill themselves in peace, without the ridiculous drain of society that the present laws demand?
    14
  102. Trump is just reiterating the Putin policy of giving away the national assets to a small group of oligarchs, criminal bankers, and hedge fund managers. Who will then pay him off with billions hidden in the computers of Panamanian lawyers like they did with Putin. Two international criminals are now posing as the leaders of the worlds most powerful nations. Blame the stupid democrats who voted for Hillary in the primaries instead of the one good man who ran. The one good man who was way ahead of either of them in the polls and now is the most loved politician in the nation. Who will the insider cheating DNS come up with to run this time, instead of the guy who would have beaten Trump like the old rug he wears. Now they are crying and still don't see how they are responsible for the present kleptocracy, under the Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief. Look this isn't the first time a New York City conman conned a bunch of small town rubes from the rust belt, and it probably won't be the last as long as lies are allowed to be reported on news channels as facts without any repercussions. The sooner the old idiots: who watch Fox new all day, and believe it, die, the better off we all will be. Democracy can work, but only if actual facts about matters are presented to the public. This is proven scientifically in the field of emergent functions. Remember the urn of beans at the state fair, where you try to guess how many beans are in it. The average of all guesses is always more accurate than the most accurate individual guess. But the facts are apparent. If gum balls and psuedo beans were mixed in and nobody actually knew what was what, it wouldn't be like that. That is the situation we are in with alt.facts like presented by Fox and the many fake organizations bankrolled by the greedy idiot savant Robert Mercer, the Koch bros and others, like Britebart news. Democracy cannot work correctly as long as people believe the lies of the power elite.
    13
  103. 13
  104. 13
  105. 13
  106. 13
  107. 13
  108. 13
  109. 13
  110. 12
  111. 12
  112. 12
  113. 12
  114. 12
  115. 12
  116. 12
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 12
  120. 12
  121. 12
  122. 12
  123.  @2brealist430  Your reasoning is superficial. First of all they are not OUR anything. You may have helped pay for them, but they are not yours. Secondly: there are bad actors on both sides, and some of the bad actors are infiltrators that are attempting to stimulate a draconian reaction against the people they hate. I agree: if violence is to be used: and for the brain dead I will add that I am not advocating violence in the least, it would be much more effective for people to burn The Hamptons and other such enclaves. Or alternately to just assassinate Wall Street executives. Not much chance of that right now. It should be obvious to anyone that this is not an expression of class warfare, it is an expression of rage from being dehumanized by what is for many an inhumane system Actually your bombastic style of rhetoric sounds quite juvenile. And you did not disprove the fact that the power elite coddle uniformed criminals so that they will be willing to kill, if it comes down to it, without hesitation, in any way. . . . Despite your trying to deflect the statement with acts that have nothing to do with what has been going on in the USA. The number of violent crimes has been continually decreasing but the number of people murdered by the police has been continually increasing. I am simply offering an explanation of why this is, and it is in no way dependent upon the action of the people now in the streets as a gut reaction to an intolerable situation. OH, I see the problem now, you took the villagers with pitchforks image literally, you must be a republican, it was a metaphor einstein.
    11
  124.  @ozzvilla9226  There are two kinds of Trump supporters, multimillionaires and fools. Which are you? The people who call themselves conservatives are not conservatives at all, they are radical selfish right-wing militaristic fascists. For your information I used to be a republican, until I saw what Reagan and his mob of thieves did to the country. Ran up the deficit and showered money on the wealthy. Trump for your information had run up the deficit faster and further than any president, bar none. And I am talking about before the Covid came around. At the same time showering the richest people in the country with government money, and destroying all the support for the less fortunate. He claimed to drain the swamp but he is the swamp. He has routinely put persons who hate specific government agencies in charge of them in order to ruin them. He is a front man for Robert Mercer and the Koch brother and you don't even know who Mercer is. He has more Goldman Sacks bankers in his cabinet than even Obama, and Obama deported more undocumented aliens then him, but he makes a big deal out of it and imprisons infants. Fuck you and fuck him and the fuck the demented horses you rode in on. By the way don't attack the democrats in response. I abjure both parties because they are owned by the same misanthropic petulance. Trump is a conman and a fake populist, we need a real populist in office like Jessie V. Anyone who idolizes Trump is a moron. And by the way, Democracy Now's accuracy makes yours look like what it is, absolute nonsense. Try checking your facts, like you didn't when you claimed that cops had the most dangerous jobs. You were only off by fifteen places which is better than most of your bullshit psuedo-altenate-facts.
    11
  125. 11
  126. 11
  127. 11
  128. Bernie $ VS Bloomburg $ Apologies to those who took arithmetic in elementary school. I know you already know this -- even so you may not be able to envision the difference in these fortunes and this explanation may help. Bernie has a stack of two million one dollar bills that he wants to give to Judy. Bernie is old and can only give her one dollar each second. If Bernie is wearing a catheter and doesn't need to go to the bathroom and can hand Judy dollar bills 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: how long will it take Bernie to give Judy his two million dollars? answer: There are 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hours and 24 hours in a day: Therefore Bernie can hand Judy 86,400 dollar bills every day. So he can give her $86,000 per day. So it would take Bernie just about 23 days and three and a half hours to give Judy two million dollars. (since $86,400 goes into $2,000,000 a little over 23.15 times) In twenty three days Bernie could hand Judy his two million dollars, one dollar at a time, if he can stay awake, and he can, cause he is a vastly woke dude. How long would it take little Mike to hand Judy his 60,2 billion dollars one dollar at a time? Mike is also old and wearing a catheter, is being fed intravenously and attended by his personal medical staff. Through the wonders of modern pharmacology and a neural implant he purchased, Mike can also stay awake. But due to age Mike can also only hand Judy one dollar bill per second. So Mike, like Bernie can give Judy $86,400 per day. There are 6,759.26 ($86,400) in 60.2 billion dollars so it would take Mike six hundred and ninety six thousand seven hundred and fifty nine days to hand Judy his 60.2 billion dollars. That's 696,759.26 days. That many days equals one thousand nine hundred and eight years and a few days short of eight months. So it would take Mike 1908.93 years to hand Judy all his money (that we know of). Bernie would be broke in 23 days. Mike would be broke in 1,909 years. Who is the oligarch? Addendum: Please note that since Mike is a capitalist who profits, not from his labor or producing goods but by investment, his wealth will actually be increasing by more than $86,400 per day because of profits on his fortune. So in reality, no matter how many thousands of years he spends handing Judy his money, he would never be able to do it and would always have more to hand her each day than he did the day before. Addendum PS: Old Jewish wisdom: "Every time somebody makes something for nothing, somebody else makes nothing for something." In Bloomburg's and the other billionares cases this "somebody else" is you and everyone else. If you don't understand this you are truly blind and will never understand why wealth is concentrating in fewer and fewer hands and you are being robbed in ways you neither understand nor can do anything about without a fundamental paradigm shift in our laws, government, and cultural world-view.
    11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 11
  132. 11
  133. 11
  134. 11
  135. 11
  136. 10
  137. 10
  138. 10
  139. 10
  140. 10
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143. 10
  144. 10
  145. 10
  146. 10
  147. 10
  148. 10
  149. 10
  150. 10
  151. 10
  152. 10
  153. Usually TYT sees through red herrings that are set up by the power elite to restrict our freedoms and impower those whose career advancement depends on stirring up hysteria then offering a solution that is exponentially more harmful than the problem. In this case TYT fell for the same old dirty trick like some county bumpkin at the county fair. When they were first soliciting public opinions on a more restrictive pain medication legislation, everybody with any real knowledge on the dynamics at play here knew this would only result in a major increase in the use of heroin and a corresponding increase in the cash flow of a number of international criminal and terrorist networks. Are you so blind as to not have a clue that the intention of the super restrictive regulations regarding the prescription of pain meds for chronic conditions set up barriers to both the sufferers of such pain and the doctors who wish they could help them. When this new restrictive legislation which makes it impossible for people with chronic pain to have a regular recurring prescription, without continual visits to their doctor, one for each prescription, and enrollment in pain clinics, which will offer a number of alternative therapies, the vast majority of which will not help the vast majority of sufferers. Use you head, this is just the next, "War On" and the only ones who are going to benefit from this criminal scam, are the bankers who wash the illegal profits of the rapidly expanding heroin market, the criminal, terrorist, and the NGOs that use it for an alternative source of funds for black ops so dirty that even black ops command can't tolerate the illegalities involved, like Reagan did in Iran/Contra. Let's not forget the directors of programs that will see a renewed influx of funding despite the restriction on marijuana being shown for it was (pure lies and folly that alienated at least three generations from the American mainstream),this really doesn't equal the folly of the present situation, or the total suffering, death, and vast corruption that the billions of dollars in additional profits for international organized crime will have on our society at large. They already have enough power to rouse up all this hysteria over what is just a bulge in population entering an age were it is just natural to seek a little analgesia. In Canada you can buy codeine over the counter without a prescription, and they have a huge appetite per capita for codeine preparations, and you can just see how decadent their society is compared to ours. Instead of acting like a bunch of ignorant dupes in this matter why don't you do some real investigative journalism and uncover the payoffs to legislators by the interests who want to restrict the sale of strong analgesics thus driving millions into the heroin market, which will cost them much less than a legal prescription, but of course has many more risks, all most all of which stem from its legal status.  My own doctor predicted a wave of suicides as the new legislation when into effect. In this he was correct. The people who, despite all of the evidence to the contrary, still believe that the government is looking out for them in this matter. It isn't, this is a program that from the very start, seemed designed to produce crime and death by overdose, and of course the suicides of people who will not take responsibility for their own pain management, and get out on the street or under the net, and buy some heroin when the new system throws insurmountable obstacles in the face of the pain sufferer. Society is once again the victim of the power elite pulling off the same old tricks in this same old matter. Like marijuana the initial restriction of the sale and use of opium in Western Civilization was in Great Britain, when it was restricted at the bequest of behind the scenes manipulation of the legislature by the distillers interests. The distillers who traditionally served the needs of the miners and factory workers so that they could remain somewhat oblivious of their pain and hopelessness of their situation. Opium was more effective, far less harmful physically so far less harmful that it is usually unbelievable to people whose thoughts on the subject have been subjected to the propaganda currently in circulation regarding this matter. Really, how can you be so irresponsible and stupid?  You did not even look into this matter at all, you just read and then commented on a press release by some official or official sounding organization. Are you gonna be part of the solution or continue to be the unknowing dupe of forces that profit from victimizing people who are desperate to just not be hurting so much that they would in many cases rather be dead than face another day of agony. . . . No only an unsympathetic, psychopath who was incapable of any degree of empathy, or who possessed not a nanoparticle of intelligence, would be the ignorant supporter of such a regressive and draconian policy as the one we now have, and which you don't even seem to know about. Fu*k all the people responsible for the new wave of criminals they have helped create, not to mention the incalculable suffering by the innocent victims of your idiot legislation, the stupidity, and failure of which was proven and predicted by every useful and successful drug policy ever enacted (see Portugal, Switzerland, and the new freedoms being passed in South America. In every case decriminalization worked, largely eliminated the street crime associated with heroin addiction and the cost to maintain a habit. This cost is actually pennies but for the illegal nature and resulting inflated prices that the various criminal and banking organizations profit so greatly from. So thanks for making what is already a colossal and devastating problem just a little bit worse.
    9
  154. 9
  155. 9
  156. 9
  157. 9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 9
  161. 9
  162. 9
  163. 9
  164. 9
  165. 9
  166. 9
  167.  @carynmartin6053  All humans have continual narratives unless they are enlightened in the moment. That being said, and true, and it is: the University of Maryland did a study years ago to find the most accurate source of news that the average person has access to. This study found that those who relied on PBS for their information held the most accurate ideas about what was actually happening in the world. As opposed to those whom relied on Fox cable news (which is one of the, if not the, most watched of all channels): those who relied on Fox as the primary source of their understanding of current events, knew less about what was actually going on than the people who had no interest in current events and did not follow the news. This seems unlikely until one understands that Fox and CNN, and their ilk, are not like the old broadcast news networks that held their news divisions as sacred and entirely isolated from, not only the entertainment divisions of the network, but more importantly from the sales department at the network. While seeming to have the prime directive similar to what the networks use to have, Fox and company are not there to inform you, like most viewers assume, their sole raison d'etre is to sell commercial advertising time. The more viewers they have the more they can sell their commercial time for. So they basically present the narrative that they assume most people want to hear. Even when some of the actual facts are correct on Fox, which is not all as common as you would think, they are embedded, in an entirely false narrative, whose only guide is the effect on the relative value of advertising time sales.
    9
  168. 9
  169. 9
  170. 9
  171. 9
  172. 9
  173. 9
  174. 9
  175. 9
  176. 9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 8
  180. 8
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. Comment part 2 However here are some of my thoughts on democracy and how it can work. In observing certain social animals, like ant colonies and bee hives, it is apparent that certain capacities are actualized of which the individual animals themselves are incapable. These are sometimes referred to as emergent functions, some of which are assumed to come about because of the activation of certain epigenetic potentials in the genome given the proper protein to initiate them. This is debatable, however the functions themselves are easily observable. Humans are also capable of emergent functioning -- in a political sense. Here is an example of this in action: We are all familiar with a type of game of chance that one sometimes comes across at a charity event or perhaps a county fair. There will be a large urn or similar vessel and it will contain tens of thousands of jelly beans or marbles or gumballs or something. And typically you make a donation or buy a "chance" and then you make a guess as to how may jelly beans are in the urn. Of course it is impossible to count the jelly beans and it is also very difficult to even make any kind of accurate estimation. So usually thousands of people will make a guess and put it in a box and then the most accurate guess wins a prize, like a car or something. Well as it turns out: the average of all of the guesses is almost always (actually "always", but I am hedging) more accurate than the best guess. . . . Now it is true there is no one obscuring parts of the urn or extolling the virtues of certain sets of numbers or otherwise lying to the guessers with false narratives about the jelly beans or the process of guessing. Of course there is no Donald Trump, or FOx news, or CNN spinning false narratives about the jelly beans or telling you that there is a large grapefruit unseen in the middle of the urn that is displacing patriotic American jelly beans, so it is not exactly the same thing as a democratic vote on legislation or some other political decision. Yet I do believe that this human potential could be brought to bear in a political scenario: if, for instance, something like fines and imprisonment or perhaps huge fines and banishment where the consequence for presenting anything but verifiable facts as evidence in arguing for or against any particular collective democratic decision. And perhaps, just maybe this collective talent could also be mobilized on a level of finer granularity by calling into question the false narratives and other deceptions of the power-elite and their legions of sycophantic wannabes to themselves be objects of observation and study as is now happening via the decentraization of political commentary and criticism made possible by the internet. So, potentially, democracy may still have some very significant tricks up it's venerable sleeve, only this time, tricks for the good instead of the in the service of evil. And perhaps some day we could be supplemented in these quandaries by the kind of advanced AI and machine learning that can beat the champions at GO. A game that seems to me, to be very like our political process. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. We have known forever that it would be best to get all money out of politics if the most ethical and fair government is what you want. We have known forever that proportional representation is superior to winner-takes-all seesaws. We have known that the banks are incapable of regulating themselves and that the wealth of the nation is being sucked up by the military industrial professional political worker complex, that the drug war is a farce that has created the first billionaire criminal organizations. In our hollowed out lives, news has become entertainment. And the fantasyland they present to the public is a poor substitute for what should have been the golden destiny of mankind on earth and in regions beyond.
    8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191. 8
  192. 8
  193. 8
  194. 8
  195. 8
  196. 8
  197. More people are killed with hammers each year than rifles. Far more people are killed with fists each year than rifles. World wide more people die from tobacco use than war. tens of thousands of people die from automobiles each year. Hundreds of thousands of people die each year from medical treatment or error. Millions of Americans are killed by their own inability to eat a healthy diet or because they are a sedentary slob. For every crime committed with a firearm three crimes (that are reported -- most aren't) are prevented by the brandishing or use of a firearm. Most people who die by firearms commit suicide and would find a different way to do it if they didn't have access to a firearm. In Switzerland the population has more firearms per capita than in the USA many of which are full automatic weapons, unlike the semi look alike rifles that shit head media personalities wrongly refer to as "assault rifles". Yet there are no mass shootings. The firearm is neither the cause nor the symptom of the alienation and polarization in our country, the media spin, corporate owned for profit fake news, and the death of the American Dream due to concentration of wealth and the legalized corruption of the Congress that serves their plutocratic masters are the infection that runs beneath. Not to mention the brainwashing of females in progressive communities to treat white males as the enemy. There has never been a crime committed in the USA with a legally owned machine gun or fully automatic weapon even though there are tens of thousands of them in civilian hands. This could actually go on and on, but firearm incidents get the headlines unlike automobile deaths which cause as much pain and suffering for the families as any other form of horrible death. Personally I would rather be shot to death by some disaffected probably mentally ill person than cut in half by a piece of jagged sheet metal to bleed out on the side of a highway by some drunk driver or some nitwit on their cell phone. But I know you feel with all your heart that firearms are the problem.
    8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. In 1969 my girlfriend and I were returning to our apt from dining out. The route we were taking went through a black section of a small city in PA. I first noticed that many of the windows on the street were smashed. It all happened very quickly. Next I notice that there were cars overturned up ahead on fire. It is a one lane one way street without room to turn around. Next I hear someone scream "whitey!" and a brick hits my windshield right in front of my girlfriend and showers her face with glass. A mob of people started to converge on my car. If it wasn't for a small alleyway that just happened to be right at the left of my car I would have had no way out. I took off down the alley and a mob of people literally collided with each other where I had been a moment before. I drove directly to the police station before I stopped because I didn't know how extensive the riots were. The car I had seen burning in the next block had held an elderly white couple that were pulled out of their car and beaten to death. My girlfriends face was covered in blood but only superficial lacerations. If not for the luck of that alley we would have been dead just because we were white. So I know exactly how it feels to be targeted for no reason but your race. The next year, my freshman year a university, I went with a close black friend to a black power rally. I was the only white person there. I was so abused both by the audience and from the stage that I got up and left, despite being there to support their cause. I guess I told you that so that you could rest assured it is a pan human trait to be brutal. Given the opportunity the oppressed will step right up an oppress others.
    8
  202. 8
  203. 8
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 7
  207. Trump is a conman, a front man for a cadre of billionares who would rather have the USA destroy itself internally, that is, give up the hope that our founders, as fallible and human as they were, had in their most ideal vision. These people, like Robert Mercer the idiot savant hedge-fund rainman, and the Kochs and other prime suspects that would rather have the nation ruined of any higher purpose than pay the taxes on their ill-gotten, planet destroying gains. Fortunately for them, they own the media, at the same time that they are telling you that the media is against them and liberal. They have millions of people thinking that real news is fake and fake news is real. They have such sophisticated means of persuasion, functionally brain washing, that they have totally transformed the nation in the last forty years no matter who was in office: Goldman Sach and the other corrupting and ruinous influences owned them, and Trump is the worst of them. He has more Goldman Sach minions in charge of agencies that they hate, than any other prez ever did. And the 80,000 rust belt white male voters that made the electoral difference still think that he is there for them, against the establishment. It's a huge farce. These people who voted for him are the kind of people who only watch Fox News -- some are functional, maybe successful and hard-working, but they are rubes. It ain't the first time that some NYC conman, pulled one over on a bunch of rust belt rubes and it won't be the last. If you see what he is actually doing, and you are yourself not at least a multimillionaire, and you are still in favor of Trump: you need to broaden your scope of information outside of things you like to hear. He is going to make your life poorer, and the rich richer, without any doubt. That is why he is there.
    7
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. 7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. 7
  253. 7
  254. 7
  255. 7
  256. 7
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. So happy that DN picked up on this. This is one of the most significant public statements by a sitting Congressman this century. So very unfortunate that the good Christian church ladies that are funding this subversion, along with Koch and other elitist misanthropes who are the real architects and funders, will not see this or be aware of it, and would not understand it or be interested in it even if they did see it. And if they can construe the narrative of "right to life" in (what is to them a melange of meaningless verbiage) it would win their nod of approval. That is the world we live in. Rule of the evil through the manipulation and deception of the stupid. And as Gurdjieff said, "Even God has no defense against stupidity." Of course the left has their own version of deceiving and manipulating the stupid, but it is not nearly as effective, because it is not stupid enough, but with the rabid pursuit of meaningless gestures against symbols that nobody pays attention to anyway, and the censure of anybody not hysterical with a kind of reactionary pseudo-egalitarian woke fervor: that ignores near all of history and most of reality -- they come darn close. Isn't it time to give up this endlessly repeating cycle of futility we are kept enmired in so the power-elite can continue to consolidate their positions: which are even now all but unassailable by any means or from any psuedo-direction, such as the established left or right. It is time to evolve beyond government that is designed to be directed through manipulation by the power-elite and into a form of government that stimulates and elevates those with intelligence and talent without them needing to be the hand-maidens to the corrupt insular power-elite. We need to transform our political system into a NeoConfusian-technomeritocracy to serve the advancement of all citizens, without need for birth advantage, or privilege.
    6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274. IMHO the most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 16 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell, but I kinda doubt it, according to Wikipedia it's range is 18 miles. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it and now the Germans have too. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada, but they pale in comparison to the capabilities of the German Panzerhaubitzen 2000 that the Dutch and Germans are supplying (unfortunately in extremely limited numbers). See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_DS6UvZXPo&t=148s The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, -- baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. This would be a truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vIPNElDkns&t=38s Estimates by Rand and other think tanks estimate that Russia has already used more than 70% of their advanced guided missiles in Ukraine and they will not be able to replace them in a timely fashion. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common towed artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon tech they may no longer have access to. In any event, even if Russia should win in Ukraine, and realistically there is very good chance of this, Russia is totally screwed in the long term. See here to find out why Peter Zeihan finds this to be the case in one of his many videos on the Geopop YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwPMtmuuVNw&t=176s As he said, "A hypersonic missile without a nuclear warhead is just a very expensive way to blow up a building." Let's hope they keep up the stupidity they have been exhibiting in this area, with their "terror weapons".
    6
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. Bernie $ VS Bloomburg $ Apologies to those who took arithmetic in elementary school. I know you already know this -- even so you may not be able to envision the difference in these fortunes and this explanation may help. Bernie has a stack of two million one dollar bills that he wants to give to Judy. Bernie is old and can only give her one dollar each second. If Bernie is wearing a catheter and doesn't need to go to the bathroom and can hand Judy dollar bills 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: how long will it take Bernie to give Judy his two million dollars? answer: There are 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hours and 24 hours in a day: Therefore Bernie can hand Judy 86,400 dollar bills every day. So he can give her $86,000 per day. So it would take Bernie just about 23 days and three and a half hours to give Judy two million dollars. (since $86,400 goes into $2,000,000 a little over 23.15 times) In twenty three days Bernie could hand Judy his two million dollars, one dollar at a time, if he can stay awake, and he can, cause he is a vastly woke dude. How long would it take little Mike to hand Judy his 60,2 billion dollars one dollar at a time? Mike is also old and wearing a catheter, is being fed intravenously and attended by his personal medical staff. Through the wonders of modern pharmacology and a neural implant he purchased, Mike can also stay awake. But due to age Mike can also only hand Judy one dollar bill per second. So Mike, like Bernie can give Judy $86,400 per day. There are 6,759.26 ($86,400) in 60.2 billion dollars so it would take Mike six hundred and ninety six thousand seven hundred and fifty nine days to hand Judy his 60.2 billion dollars. That's 696,759.26 days. That many days equals one thousand nine hundred and eight years and a few days short of eight months. So it would take Mike 1908.93 years to hand Judy all his money (that we know of). Bernie would be broke in 23 days. Mike would be broke in 1,909 years. Who is the oligarch? Addendum: Please note that since Mike is a capitalist who profits, not from his labor or producing goods but by investment, his wealth will actually be increasing by more than $86,400 per day because of profits on his fortune. So in reality, no matter how many thousands of years he spends handing Judy his money, he would never be able to do it and would always have more to hand her each day than he did the day before. Addendum PS: Old Jewish wisdom: "Every time somebody makes something for nothing, somebody else makes nothing for something." In Bloomburg's and the other billionares cases this "somebody else" is you and everyone else. If you don't understand this you are truly blind and will never understand why wealth is concentrating in fewer and fewer hands and you are being robbed in ways you neither understand nor can do anything about without a fundamental paradigm shift in our laws, government, and cultural world-view.
    5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. The Dutch had these in storage, but how many did they actually send? I have heard between four and eight, but no one who is talking seems to know. Italy could also send them if it cared to. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 5
  406. 5
  407. 5
  408. 5
  409. You make the common mistake of equating being stoned on pot with being drunk on booze. Does drinking coffee make you a worse driver? -- No it doesn't -- it is a drug, it has psychological and physiological effects (for those of you who still think there is a distinction there) yet only an idiot would think that drinking coffee causes traffic accidents. All recreational molecules are not equal. All of their effects are not equal. Some drugs will actually make you able to drive better in some situations. The entire Nazi blitz of WW2 was an intoxicated action with the troops on a amphetamines handed out by their COs. Why do you think that athletes preform better under the influence of certain drugs? Everything is a drug. My words are drugs that are now bringing about an emotional and intellectual effect in you, anger is a drug. It is much more dangerous to drive angry than stoned on pot. But leave it to the simple minded to reduce everything to the simplistic modes of thinking that they use out of laziness and habit. Then drugs are drugs (except for the coffee, chocolate, sugar, natural flavorings, environmental contaminants, news reports, books, thoughts, environmental toxins and having to deal with imbeciles on a regular basis.) Didn't you catch on yet. Almost everything that politicians say is a lie to increase or maintain their power. It goes no further than that. Also the worst people to put in charge of things in the role of a leader are the people who really want to be the leader. They will lead you straight into their own bespoke form of insanity. Wait and see. . . .
    4
  410. Yeah you realize both the parties are corrupt but you are focusing on the wrong aspect of the problem. You can't destroy this hydra of corruption by attacking one of the heads, you have to destroy the root of the corruption. Figure out how to make Campaign Finance Reform sexy, and save the nation from the criminal scumbags that are now stealing our nation. If you have two brain cells to rub together you can figure out that the funding of politics is nothing but a system of corruption that was put in place to steal as much as possible for as long as possible. A populist movement cannot win as long as the worst among us: the Mercers, Kochs, and Goldman Sachs minions, control everything through a system of corruption that they themselves have devised. Sure it seems like there are a thousand issues: Trump giving away national assets like Putin did to a bunch of rich unevolved assholes who are proud of their predation upon the populace, and their endless red herrings that get all the single issue voters at one anothers' throats: climate change, fundamentalist morons who think that the world is six thousand years old and will end tomorrow, wars in support of private business interests, wholesale surveillance of the citizens, a ridiculous number of psychopaths with badges who believe they are licensed to kill, etc. etc. etc. But I am telling you that Robert Mercer understands that the lynch pin of control is campaign finance, that’s why he funds Citizens United, and Britbart, and put Trump in office by giving him key words found by Cambridge Anaylitica to repeat over and over, in near meaningless lies, that the mindless fools that watch and believe Fox News and similar founts of lies were responding to on a limbic level. He knows that campaign finance is the key to power – do you? Until this is done, the present plutocratic kleptocracy will swiftly recover from any temporary setbacks, including bids by third parties which they will absorb. Sorry if it boars you. It’s not up to your opinion, this is the game theory, this is the facts. Robert Mercer is using the power of Artificial Intelligence against the population and government of the USA to make your voice and vote more meaningless than it already is. Campaign finance reform must be done, not because it is somebodies interest or pet interest, but because it is the only thing that CAN be done to stop this avalanche of shit the one percent is burying us under. Goldman Sachs gave the American public a choice in the last election and that choice was, “Would you rather live in shit or piss.” And thanks to 80,000 rust belt fools who were conned by a New York City conman, America chose shit. And until campaign finance is addressed and totally deprivatized you will only have a choice between shit and piss in all the coming elections. Unless a real populist like Bernie is nominated (don’t hold your breath) as he should have been, and reforms this madness. The shit we are in now is because of the neoliberal idiots who supported and cheated for Hillary and voted for her in the primary even though all the polls showed Bernie as way more likely to beat Trump than her. Trump knew it, he even said it, Cambridge Anaylitica probably told him, and still the Hillary supporters deny it. As Gurdjieff wrote, “Even God has no defense against stupidity.” Blessings to those of evolving conscience.
    4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. My question to you is: Should just the descendants of slaves from the Atlantic slave trade to the USA be compensated or the descendants of all slaves? Cuba received three times the number of African slaves as the USA, and Brazil received five times that amount. And the number of black African slaves that were exported to the middle east and north Africa equaled the number exported to the Americas. Why stop there: almost everybody has slaves or serfs in their family history. Most of Europe was used as a resource for slaves by Rome. The Islamic Caliphate raided the coasts of Italy, and all of Europe as far as Iceland for slaves for more than two centuries, yet I do not hear the descendants of these slaves (those that survived to have descendants: which were few) crying for reparations. Perhaps Aramco and Saudi Arabia should reparate all white Europeans for their ancestor's barbarism? Discrimination is a separate issue than reparations. Why should a family (such as my own) who never owned slaves, who in fact were active in the underground railroad and harbored runaways on their farm in PA be penalized for something they had nothing to do with? And in reality who was it who took the black African slaves into captivity in the first place? It was mostly other black Africans and Moslem slave traders. Should their descendants pay? If not, why not? Why not trace the money that the companies who profited from slave labor made, and if any of it still exists in the form of personal or corporate wealth, then confiscate it and disperse it to the descendants of those who were enslaved by these concerns, instead of expecting a handout from those who had absolutely nothing to do with it and are more than likely the descendants of slaves themselves, who got over it and moved on.
    4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again you woke puddin' heads. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492.  @cavalier5727  You don't like what we actually know about the Euopean invasion of the Americas, so there can be no truth in it -- so childish. The Truth is easy to see. No stone age group has survived intact when it came in contact with a technologically superior culture, with the exception of Sentinal island off the coast of India that has been declared off-limits by the gov of India. You would not want to live there. Nobody has resisted the truth being brought into light as you say, more than the people who believe a revisionist romantic fantasy of Native American culture and know nothing of the near constant war between various groups, the lack of any meaningful progress in most any area, the brutal torture (usually to death, which is why Native Americans did not surrender in battle) as the rule not the exception for captives and enemies, the delight by women and children in taking part in the torture of captives, the helplessness in the face of pathogens, the self hobbling superstitions taken as fact, which lead to things like the ritual sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of people on an industrial scale, cannabalism, and murderous raiding of civilians as a business model. Or even the fact that most of the Africans taken into captivity were taken by other subsaharan Africans or Muslim slavers. Their real history like that of all peoples includes the brutal and the humane. Instead of the truth the woke puddin'-heads believe in a golden age of noble savage environmentalists that never existed except in their heads and Hollywood. The real history of the European conquest of the Americas is the history of several vastly imperfect and violent cultures in conflict. Just like it happened everywhere else in the world when a technologically or organizationally superior culture came in contact with a primitive one.
    4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 4
  516. 4
  517. 4
  518. 4
  519. 4
  520. 4
  521. 4
  522. 4
  523. 4
  524. 4
  525. 4
  526. 4
  527. 4
  528. 4
  529. 4
  530. 4
  531. 4
  532. 4
  533. 4
  534. 4
  535. 4
  536. 4
  537. 4
  538. 4
  539. 4
  540. 4
  541. 4
  542. 4
  543. 4
  544. 4
  545. 4
  546. 4
  547. 4
  548. 4
  549. 4
  550. 4
  551. 4
  552. 4
  553. 4
  554. 4
  555. 4
  556. 4
  557. 4
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. Personally I have nothing against the psychedelic family of recreational molecules. However for Graham to believe that having an "experience" that is brought about by the ingestion of one or another plant alkaloid, or other external substance, is having a "direct experience" is laughable. It's obvious from all his hedging about the relative value of drug induced, versus actual experience, that he is deeply confused.  Probably because he has never had an actual experience of awakening.   That is the only way that someone could equate a psychedelic experience with higher consciousness brought on through the ignition of natural but latent neural/hormonal systems.   That is the only way that real growth is brought about.  If your higher states of consciousness are not accessible to you without a drug, or even the need for another person, then the truth is that you know nothing real or useful about the higher experiences that you are pursuing.  So you have to look in all the places that you have been conditioned to look: like ancient civilizations, religions, and drugs and what not.  In other words all the wrong places. Your experiences with DMT though shattering and extremely charged are subjective and meaningless.  The comparison of the natural ignition of these higher human potentials and an experience that is the result of the ingestion of a recreational molecule is tenuous at best.  The reality of an actual physical, metabolic awakening, has about the same relationship to drug use as it does to religion or some other spiritual practice.  Not quite none, it is true, but the vast majority of comparisons between the two are of no real value and only serve to muddy the situation still further. Though it is an actual physical substance that is needed to activate an expanded awareness, or if you prefer the imagrery, that is the key to the kingdom: you can only grow that plant in the interface between the repurposing of ancient genetic potenials and the desire to look directly at things, and the love of euphoria, bliss, consciousness, and intelligence.  That is why it is necessary to grow in a balanced manner that incorporates both mental, and physical, as well as the so-called emotions and higher emotions. As Joe mentioned, yoga wouldn't hurt, it would be far more efficacious to find someone who actually can, activate these higher systems within themselves, and interact with them.  That may be kind of hard to do.  For instance though I have met dozens of highly respected and sometimes worshiped yoga masters and instructors I have never met one that was awake, or that even knew what direction real awakening lies in.  Good luck with that.  I can only tell you that waking up naturally is a lot more fun than the advocates of psychedelics like Terence McKenna would have you believe. While most everything that presents itself as a means to awaken is worse than bullshit, it is actually a waste of time: the inner means of doing so are as fresh as the day they were layed down, in fact in most everyone that remain virginal right onto death.  
    3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. No you don't.  There never was a prescription that is written "as needed", you dumba**, that's just the instructions on how to take your meds that the drugstore prints on the bottle. If you take that bottle and try to get it refilled without a visit to your doctor, or your doctor lying about a visit and they will tell you it cannot be refilled.  You will have to either have a housecall, be active in a pain management program and visit there before it is refilled, or go to your doctor's office or an emergency room -- every time you need it refilled. That is the new Federal law, and apparently between yourself and TYT you know nothing about it. Nevertheless, you managed to make an ass of yourself, by such narcissistic pride of your ignorance. I actually thought such instant karma was reserved for the far far right, who shoot themselves in the foot almost every time they shoot off their mouths. Just like you did. Though they seldom have the perception to be able to realize it without some assistance. Then they get all touchy because another one of their mistakes is to equate ignorance with stupidity. While it is certainly not true that all conservatives are stupid. Far, far, from it. All of them are ignorant of just how untrue the facts they base their opinions on are.  For instance, some males on the subcontinent are very conservative regarding the practice of sati, and many of these same conservatives are capable of extreme mental vigor and problem solving abilities, a man can be highly competent in abstract metaphysical cognition, or higher mathematics, and still think that it is a nice tradition for a wife to throw herself, or be thrown by relatives onto the funeral pyre of her husband. Sort of like the people who can honestly lay claim to an IQ higher than a moron, and still support Donald Trump's bid. Haven't these people ever seen a conman before. Bernie = statesman Trump = conman
    3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. Empathy flows in all directions. Prejudice is a polar or you might say bipolar or dichotomous expression that is actually based in the survival instinct. This is a result of a nervous system that is largely based on the pragmatism of natural selection and is constructed upon the polar charges of ions on a cellular and hormones on a systemic level. People like to think that their opinions and attitudes are based on the rationalizations that they present in retrospect. A person who sympathizes with the downtrodden in whatever guise yet is intolerant of those they view as the dominant or the benefactors of the dominant culture, may be sympathetic, but they are not empathetic. Which is really too bad. The world needs more empathy just because empathy is omnidirectional, neutral, and aspires to objectivity. Democracy Now is a good example of prejudicial sympathy and lack of empathy. Of course they are as reactionary as Fox News, but in a so to say opposing direction. I for one am sick of both the left and the right, and quite in favor of letting the best real science determine the course of human endeavour. Unfortunately at the moment this is only possible through the efforts of people like Elon Musk who are both science based, and have enough capital to pursue the real significant problems of the human race. The first and forermost of which is to survive another extinction event by generatiing a self-sustaining colony off-earth. He is not doing this for his own benefit you know. The second most important thing is to end global warming. So far Tesla is the best bet to decellerate the rate of global warming, and has opened their patents to their competition to use free, becasue Musk is more concerned with getting ride of internal combustion engines than dominating the competition. Real actions for real threats. The golden destiny of humanity lies in the stars -- so my general comment to people is to "get over it."
    3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. In 1969 my girlfriend and I were returning to our apt from dining out. The route we were taking went through a black section of a small city in PA. I first noticed that many of the windows on the street were smashed. It all happened very quickly. Next I notice that there were cars overturned up ahead on fire. It is a one lane one way street without room to turn around. Next I hear someone scream "whitey!" and a brick hits my windshield right in front of my girlfriend and showers her face with glass. A mob of people started to converge on my car. If it wasn't for a small alleyway that just happened to be right at the left of my car I would have had no way out. I took off down the alley and a mob of people literally collided with each other where I had been a moment before. I drove directly to the police station before I stopped because I didn't know how extensive the riots were. The car I had seen burning in the next block had held an elderly white couple that were pulled out of their car and beaten to death. My girlfriends face was covered in blood but only superficial lacerations. If not for the luck of that alley we would have been dead just because we were white, at the age of 17. So I know exactly how it feels to be targeted for no reason but your race. The next year, my freshman year a university, I went with a close black friend to a black power rally. I was the only white person there. I was so abused both by the audience and from the stage that I got up and left, despite being there to support their cause. I guess I told you that so that you could rest assured it is a pan human trait to be brutal. Given the opportunity the oppressed will step right up an oppress others. It is, as you say, a disgusting situation, but by no means isolated to one particular race.
    3
  576. Politics sucks ass. Isn't it apparent to everyone by now that our political system is an archaic artifact? An artifact based on humanities inability to escape it's bestial warlike nature . . . :campaigns, winner take all victories, leaders who neither lead (excepting the advancement of the concerns of their patrons) nor have the wisdom to make intelligent impartial decisions on the issues of the day. This political web of deceit is a self-perpetuating parasite that warps collective social culture and is itself continually warped due to shameful self-interested exploitation by those who control the economy through control of debt manipulation. Interests and principalities that spew false narratives which have contaminated every aspect of our expectations of daily life, and our future aspirations (or lack of them). I suggest to you that there are other alternatives. Far more efficient alternatives, that would benefit the whole of society and reduce the corruption that is not only a systemic disease of our political system, but is now the very sinew, marrow, and circulatory system, of a body politic that has done everything possible to free itself from both morality and justice through legislative and legal complexities, technicality, outright lies, and all manner of fuckery. It is time to evolve folks. Like a cool pool on a hot day, once you take the plunge it's refreshing and rejuvenating, but before you take that plunge there is hesitation and a resistance to a state change. And we must change the state of our state unless we consider moving into the future by looking through a rear-view mirror and stepping on our own dicks every step of the way while perpetually bitiching about it to be some kind of desirable human prerogative. Because as it is, it will never be able to meet our real human needs or provide anything more than updated reruns of the same old conundrums. If human culture and civilization is to advance it must evolve to a higher state, a higher system of state, which will nurture higher states of mind in the populace, not continually drag it back by aggravating the primal survival instinct in a technological environment wherein this instinct is counterproductive on numerous levels. I suggest to you that a body politic based on a NeoConfusian Techno-Meritocracy would not only be vastly superior for the state of the state, state of the economy, state of human advancement, and our collective state of mind, that any comparison to the present drunken-knife-fight-in-a-gilded-bordello that passes for our government would be comical.
    3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. @Raiderology The "opium war tradition" sounds like an erzats conceptual structure devised to rationalize a particular narrative. You can find such stories everywhere on all sides of all issues. I have found in almost sixty years of study that one of the most important things a human can learn to differentiate is the difference between things that only exist if someone is thinking about them or entertaining them in some published work, and things whose existence persists even if they are entirely outside of the scope of human attention. As simple as this seems I have no doubt that no one who reads this will appreciate the significance this little factor has in society in general and their personal life. There is almost no chance that you will personnally understand this despite understanding what the words I have written mean conceptually. A real physical fact is the wholesale death of desperate Americans due to the importation by the Mexican drug cartels of Chinese produced fentanyl. In some circles is thought to be a stratagem of the CCP. I do not believe this, but some do. What there is no doubt about is that Chinese businessmen are becoming rich by the wholesale destruction of an entire social class of Americans. I am quite aware that some American shipping companies, mostly out of NYC were involved peripherally in the Opium trade, but not nearly to the extent of the British East India Company. What is significant today is not the politics of a bygone age which the US government had no hand in, but this continual assault on the most desperate of Americans, by the collusion of criminal Mexican billionaires and conscienceless Chinese businessmen. Personally I hold the position that all drugs should be decriminalized and that addictive drugs such as heroin should be provided free of charge to addicts in a clinical setting along with the continual offer of therapy and perhaps the offer of ibogaine preparations that are known to quell addiction quite well. But know in advance that I totally expect you to cling to the side of things with no real physical existence in that that is the only manner in which to see you view as valid. So, as they say, more pouring of the null into the void.
    3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. What you do not seem to understand is that despite the grandfatherly patients, sensitivity, and aged issues, Joe spent his childhood in the hard coal region of PA. A bar on every corner (at the time) and lots of drunk, angry, miners in them, many of whom still had jobs, and lots, I mean lots of demented abused kids on the street, just waiting for an opportunity to kick ass for fun or profit. So what? "Nobody fucks with a Bidden." -- Joey B. Now I personally do not agree with much of Bidden' political shenanigans, which are largely symbolic in effect, but serve to alienate the more sane portion of the so-called conservatives (actually right-wing radicals these days). He is a very successful politician, which means many things, including that he is a liar. But the key point is that his decisions whether right (as in support for Ukraine) or wrong (In his posturing against the only successful new American auto company in a hundred years, and attributing their achievements to the unionized traditional OEMs that are struggling to evolve.) At least his decisions are based on reason, even if at times those reasons are political. He may not be able to count on the anti-Trump vote if Trump loses in the primary (not likely). But if Trump does run again, most people will hold their noses and vote for Joe again. If the Republicans manage to shut off the funding of Ukraine, and the Europeans do not take up the slack, one of the most effective means of reducing the power of rule by totalitarian methods, which are always against the evolution of civilization and humans, will have been squandered. The far reaching effects of the undermining of the significance of real facts as opposed to right-wing fancy and fantasy as the means by which the billionaire Robert Mercer (the REAL money behind Trump and the chaos brought on by denial of reality by right-wing nuts and fanatics) could decrease his tax burden. Not the first time a New York City conman (Donny) pulled the wool over the eyes of a bunch of small town rubes, and it won't be the last. But, "Fool me once, shame on you. . ." -- Now we will see if all the "small-town rubes" who loved Trump have been fooled once, or if they actually are fools.
    3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628.  @paultorbert6929  So it would seem. It was never stated in the original remark that "the universe" is ONLY a concept. Common sense would infer that our ideas about the universe refer to something "out there", separate and distinct from our subjective associations regarding it. Common sense also infers that the sun orbits he earth. I may be incorrect, but I think that the problem people are having with my original statement is that they do not know what the word "fungible" means. Consider this (for the moment considering the "multiverse" as another word for an expanded conception of the same thing) the "universe", as the word is commonly understood, is: everything considered as one thing. First we have the universe of everything, next you propose a "universe" minus it's most significant quality: life. Therefore according to the assumption that makes your question possible you refer to two quite distinct things as the universe: the universe that is everything and a universe minus life. This question in itself proves that though you may not realize it, you consider the universe to be a concept that is fungible. That is: a universe minus life can stand-in for a universe consisting of everything. Yet the universe minus anything would not be the universe would it? This is not even to examine the lack of actual knowledge about the real significance and magnitude of life.  We do not know if life on earth is the only life, and there is a very good possibility that it is.  We do not even know if the universe itself is alive on a scale that is beyond our present perception, though there are many various concepts that claim it is, and this would explain a lot.  We do not know if life as it is automatically and commonly conceived of even exists. We do not know how the functioning of quantum mechanics would be altered without any observer.  We do not even know if life and the apparent perception of a universe "out there" is a simulation.  So we do not even know what is meant by a "universe without any life". Yet you still refer to it as "the universe". Which once again proves my original statement that the universe is a concept and as such is infinitely fungible.  It can be one thing, It can be more than one thing. As it is a concept that is enormously ambiguous, and serves mainly as a conceptual black box for cosmological theories. Would there be anything without life? . . . Maybe. Would it be "the universe"?  The question doesn't really even make sense. Who would there be to refer to it as such? The universe is a concept that mankind made up and uses. It has changed with our knowledge, it will continue to change as our perceptual and conceptual capabilities change in many ways, many different ways by many different minds. It is fungible. Is there a universe that is separate from our conceptions of it? Strictly speaking, no, not if the universe is held to be EVERYTHING, because our conceptions are physical just as our emotions are physical, and if the universe is held to be everything, then if you take everything and subtract a part of it that you do not even know the significance or magnitude of; it is no longer everything, and cannot be accurately referred to as "the universe". On the other hand since the universe is a concept and it is fungible you are certainly free to conceptualize it in a manner in which your question appears to make sense. This is because the universe is a concept and as such is infinitely fungible. If any further comments portray the inability to comprehend the preceding they will go without further response.
    3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. I am a Tesla investor and was proud of it, until Elon began to spread idiotic disinformation and partisan spin and lies through X. X is a cesspool from what I see of it and yet people pay to do on X what is free elsewhere on the net. Elon is definitely intelligent enough to see that Trump is a monumental A hole. So the question is: What is the purpose of Elon's inane action, in supporting him. Like his trumpeting of the need for "Free Speech, which is really the support for the deluge of lies and conspiracy theories that has taken over social media. But Elon is in a position where he will soon be able to control the social dialogue with an unprecedented power never before seen on earth. The combination of X and XAI will allow him to almost take over the social media discourse for hundreds of millions of people. This whole championing of free speech by him is really a Trojan horse, by which he is championing the right to lie through the media, because that is what he intends to do with it: make his political lies a reality on a scale that the foremost liar of our times -- Trump -- can only dream of. Too bad about Musk, the power has finally corrupted him, and he only wants more of it. Him referring to himself as Darth MAGA at the Trump rally where he danced around like a fool was all too accurate, and probably something he intended as an insult to the intelligence of the very people who believe his nonsense. Despite this I intend to buy another Tesla because he only owns 14% of the company, is a great manager when it comes to manufacturing and growing Tesla, but he has become corrupted by power as do all humans. I had actually expected better from him.
    3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. Concerning Iowa: We will figure out exactly how they cheated, then we will figure out the next way that they cheated, and the one after that, and so on: with a factual and rational narrative about the qualities of people who would do such things. We will even say, "They said it couldn't happen here.": out of ironic gallows humor. Maybe at times their cheating will be so outrageous that hundreds of thousand of people will march or occupy something, but amazingly, almost miraculously Mitch and Lindsey, and the rest of Caligula JR's little unholy Greek chorus will retain their offices, and they will go on cheating and bullying and claiming that the law is what ever they think it is at the moment. And we will figure it all out. And you will make it funny and entertaining. But now we have reached a point in politics where: as in the attempt to transcend one's own habitual mode of mental functioning: knowing doesn't matter. You may know that the associative functioning of the thought-centric mind is mechanical, but that doesn't transcend or transform anything. So it is with our political system. We have known forever that it would be best to get all money out of politics if the most ethical and fair government is what you want. We have known forever that proportional representation is superior to winner-takes-all seesaws. We have known that the banks are incapable of regulating themselves and that the wealth of the nation is being sucked up by the military industrial professional political worker complex, that the drug war is a farce that has created the first billionaire criminal organizations. In our hollowed out lives, news has become entertainment. And the fantasyland they present to the public is a poor substitute for what should have been the golden destiny of mankind on earth and in regions beyond.
    3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. Pushing those who suffer chronic pain from a doctors care to the underground heroin market is not an unintended consequence of short-sighted legislation. The people who brought and pushed through the reforms to pain med availability were fully aware what the consequences would be.  A primer in clear thinking follows: Who controls the government? Those who provide the candidates for office with the money necessary to be elected. Who provides this money? Mostly the financial and banking industries and a few very rich families that make massive political contributions in order to buy the legislation they want. If you haven't noticed it doesn't matter one bit whether a democrat of republican wins any particular election in the US. In either case the same people are still calling the shots. And they basically operate out of the reptilian brain. Who would profit from pushing those dependent on opioids into buying illegal drugs? These same banking interests. Why is that so?  Who do you think launders (20 -50% ) and invests the billions of dollars made by the major criminal organizations? When these changes were open to discussion before they were put through, expert after expert testified that exactly what has happened would happen: suicide, and an illegal drug epidemic. It may seem harsh, but personally I do not care one bit about the individuals people who die from drug use. I think it is stupid to continually revive and care for those who OD. Let them die, it's an easy way to go, in many cases death by opioids is like an angel of mercy from their horrendous lives and act as a sort of Darwinian disposal method for society as a whole. Of course if these drugs were decriminalized and the people were actually cared about by our society they could easily live a normal life while using. In fact the example of Portugal (and other countries that take reality into consideration) have proven that their policies actually causes a decrease in drug use. Even the use of marijuana has decreased among teenagers in the Netherlands since it was legalized, and eventually the same will happen in the states in the USA that have same laws concerning it. It just won't be cool because it isn't edgy any longer and doesn't represent a revolutionary or risky act.
    3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715.  @StephieGsrEvolution  How do I catalogue your errors, let me count the ways. Well, i am not a libertarian. I absolutely do understand capitalism. You may ascribe all the distasteful aspects of collective human behavior to a particular economic system but that would be naive and simply simplistic. I could for instance point out that the most heinous acts of the power elite in history were the acts of self-declared anti-capitalist leaders like Stalin and Mao who together murdered about a hundred million of their own people, with no capitalism involved. I could point out that the most desirable countries to live in are all socialist in government, but rely on controlled capitalist segments of their society to fund the whole shebang, like in Denmark, Norway, and their ilk. Or I could point out the failure of all modern nations that deplored capitalism. Or that until it embraced the capitalist dynamic the people of China periodically ate tree bark or each other. I could perhaps point out that there are no purely capitalist countries. I could point out that markets predate even the idea of capitalism by thousands of years, yet those countries that thrived did so because of markets. I could point out that even though the Spanish empire literally owned a mountain made of silver it was superseded by the Netherlands, merely because the Netherlands developed a stock market. But before I go on to great extent, I think anybody with a bit of perception and perspective could easily see the fact that blaming the manifestation of negative human behaviors on an economic system is naive and simplistic and anyone with two neurons to rub together can see that historically they have been there all along, no matter the economic systems in play. I further see in your response that you have absolutely no idea what I was indicating by the words RetroConfucian TechnoMeritocracy. But carry on with your partisan narrative, it is no better or worse than most of the disinformation out there. Or better yet, develop a viable alternative that will actually work. I have one, but like your response has indicated, with those whom can only look at the future through a rear-view mirror: really new ideas will not fly. Mainly because they think they already know what they are, without understanding them in the least. (Apologizes Marshal M.)
    3
  716. 3
  717. "Weapons of War" . . . No country I am aware of arms it's military with semi-automatic firearms. So your entire thought process is faulty to begin with. No one uses firearms similar to those that would be banned, or bought back, in their military. They are not weapons of war. An apache gunship is a weapon of war. An a-10 warthog is a weapon of war. An m4 carbine is a weapon of war. Oh it looks a lot like an AR15 -- the only difference is in the function -- DUHHHH. . . . An AR15 is a sporting firearm. Depending on the calibre it may be a legal hunting firearm. It fires one shot each time you pull the trigger. An m4 fires many shots if you hold the trigger down. An AR15 does not do this. That is all the difference. There are tens of thousands of legal registered machine guns in civilian hands in the USA and there has never been a crime committed with any of them. Switzerland has real weapons in the homes of many citizens. full automatic weapons, yet -- no massacres. Could it be that crazy individuals who want to kill a bunch of people will find a way? I think so. In a strange way, using a firearm both localizes and announces such events -- most of the time. Whereas some self assumed evil genius type could kill loads of people and never be found out. Or some stooge would take the fall, cause the police needed to make a show. Anyhow, you do know that the extreme right-wing, is extremely armed. I mean they have weapons hidden that will never be confiscated. So many that if you really knew about it, it would give you nightmares. So if that is what you want, for an armed ultra right wing, and the impossibility of defending yourself against them, or the government:. then the whole gun-control narrative makes sense.
    3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. Worked great in Switzerland too. And surprize surprise: heroin addicts that don't have to spend their days scrounging for money and finding drugs are actually able to work and hold a job and live quite normally. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734.  @tigran56  Peck is certainly lying throughout the whole of his documentaries. These are lies of omission. The Europeans triumphed over these cultures largely by strength of arms and other technological means, and of course the microbes to which they had no immunity and which are estimated to have killed between 50 and 90 percent of the native population of the Americas, but the barbarism was common to both victor and the defeated, Though he pointedly never points this out. Many of the native tribes that reemerged after the fall of the huge mound building civilizations (which fell before the tidal European engagement in the Americas) learned horsemanship and became warrior cultures. Their prime means of survival was raiding each other and the Spanish colonies. They were certainly more warlike than the respective European countries of the time, but lacked only the means of totally destroying one another, because, but for the adoption of European advancements they only had stone age techniques of murdering, enslaving, and making war. The entire documentary series is rife with a twisted narrative that ignores the evils of man, such as the Moslem slavers that took more slaves than England, Spain, and Portugal combined, and were far more murderous toward them. I just don't have the time to go through this point by point, but anyone that is really interested can read about what we actually know, without the bias present in Peck, and find out that almost every sentence he utters is misleading because of PREJUDICE against European civilization and the failure to describe all the other things taking place in the world at the same time by other cultures. Lets take one example from history then I am done. During the American Revolutionary War, more continental soldiers died in prison ships in New York harbor than died on the battle field. About fifty percent of the prisoners died. However in the perpetual wars and raiding of one Indian tribe by another, virtually 100 percent of the prisoners died, and in fact were commonly tortured to death as community entertainment. So as brutal as the English may have been, they lagged behind the Native American warrior cultures. And by the way, it is naive to think that the British were the only culture that considered themselves to be the apex of civilization while employing devilish actions. All cultures did this. It is the common human condition of the power elites. It is this blairingly obvious fact that is completlely ignored in these documentries which are just a bunch of crap compared to a real understanding of what we actually know of history. But no doubt that will not matter at all to most of a particular inane ANTI bent. Why bother to study when you can just believe what you want to. Isn't this just exactly what he appears to be striving against? Consider his own personal history growing up in one failed black governed state after another. Peck is a little man of little mind and even less truth.
    3
  735.  @tigran56  You project too much into what you read. All people develop the military technology they are capable of. This has been the case since the Assyrians formed the first professional armies and attacked and dominated their neighbors. I never said that the Europeans were the greatest versions of humanity. I never assumed any of the attitudes you project onto me. I am simply stating the obvious. What is verifiable fact, as opposed to the false dichotomies that Peck evokes? It is quite notable that you could not find fault with the actual facts I conveyed but instead had to assume a bunch of nonsense about attitudes I neither hold nor have in any manner conveyed. This is typical of people who are immune to facts because of the beliefs they hold. Like Trump supporters who refuse to admit that Biden won the election, so are the woke puddin' heads who refuse to acknowledge the relative barbarism of all cultures and insist on judging peoples who struggled in past centuries because they did not hold post sixties progressive attitudes. Your talk of supremism is absolute nonsense when seen in the light that almost every primitive tribe refers to themselves as "The Real People, The Chosen People, The Human Beings", and various terms that discriminate against others and hold themselves out as special. This is common to all cultures, even to high schools and any group that needs to feel cohesive in the face of any type of opposition. And I repeat, it is quite telling that you cannot find a valid argument against the historic influences that I have only hinted at. Like Peck naming the crusades as the first white supremacist act, when they invaded Moslem lands. Of course he fails to point out they these were not always Moslem lands and had been taken by force of arms from the previous inhabitants who were mostly Sasanids, and Christians. The remnants of the Parthian and Eastern Roman Empire, and of course the Christian remnants of the Germanic tribes that had destroyed the western Roman Empire and settled in northern Africa, and even Greek remnants of Alexanders conquests -- as was the case for centuries in Egypt. It is also telling that you find the recounting of relevant facts tedious, long winded, and European. How typical of attitudes based on fantasy that must uphold themselves somehow, and can't really deal with the reality of the situation under scrutiny.
    3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. I own several Chinese EV OEMS, but I am aware that China has major problems, both domestically, and geopolitically. The end of the Chinese miracle is clearly in sight. They are basically screwed no matter how you look at it. And their policies are so stupid. They don't have and haven't been able to develop a vaccine that works, so they have to enforce a zero tolerance program that shuts down industry. And the truth is they probably started the whole thing in one of their labs. Now they are backing Russia, whose actions are going to lead directly to China not being able to get enough petroleum to continue on course, and what they do get will be at a high price. China is totally dependent on it's adversaries for it's prosperity, and on the middle east for it's oil, and even if it made a full transition to EVs and nuclear and solar, it needs petrol for it's industrial base stocks. No petrol, no plastic, no plastic, no manufacturing of most every consumer good, from clothing to iphones, to EVs. And this is not even considering that all it's oil has to pass through choke points controlled by it's enemies. Then there is the demographic time bomb, which is just beginning to hit. Masses of old people with no social security net, and very few young people to man the factories and take care of them. Demographics do not lie. It's now or never for China because in a decade or so it is so screwed. Maybe the Tesla bot will save them, lol. Their fearless leader has no idea what is really happening in his own country because he has shot the messenger so many times. I like many are counting on China in the short term, but now with the Ukraine thing and the possibility of a shut down in Russian oil that will deplete the world oil supply even the mid term is very shaky. Consider this: the pipelines from Russia to Europe run through Ukraine, lets say they are destroyed by the war, or by sabotage: it's not a matter of shut it down and start it back up. The last time Russia had to shut down the pipelines so the system would not self destruct because of over-pressure it took nearly thirty years to get everything running again, and this was only possible because of western expertise and management. These western experts are no longer in Russia. If the pipeline is shut down, which it will have to be, if either it is disrupted by violence or if Germany decides to no longer pay for the war by buying Russian gas and oil, according to Peter Zehan it will take a minimum of ten years to get it running again. In case you are unaware, there is no viable pipeline from Russia to China. China gets it's oil by supertanker form the middle east. It cannot get it by supertanker from Russia. There are no deep water ports to use. They would have to use small ships and off load to super tankers in NATO territorial waters and that ain't gonna happen. Just some word of warning about overoptimism on a long term future prosperity for China. Unless of course the Tesla bot saves them form themselves. Which actually could happen.
    3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. Below is from the actual FDA regulations regarding honey. You are totally incorrect in this. And therefore none of your information is truly above suspicion. What enforcement authorities does FDA have for food products that are represented solely as “honey,” but contain other ingredients? FDA’s enforcement authorities for food products that are represented as “honey,” but contain other ingredients, are described below. Case A : A product is labeled as “honey,” but it contains natural raspberry flavoring. The ingredient statement lists only “honey.” According to section 403(i) of the FD&C Act, a food is misbranded unless the label bears : (1) the common or usual name of the food, if there be any; and (2) the common or usual name of each ingredient, if the food is made from two or more ingredients. In this case, the name of the food , “honey ,” does not accurately describe that the food is a raspberry -flavored honey, so “honey” is not an appropriate common or usual name under 21 CFR 102.5(a). Moreover, the ingredient statement lists only one ingredient, “honey,” wh ile the food contains “honey” and “natural flavoring .” Therefore, the product fails to satisfy the requirements under 21 CFR 101.4(a)(1) and section 403(i)(2) of the FD&C Act , and FDA would consider such product to be misbranded. Case B : A product is labeled as “honey,” but it contains honey and another sweetener, such as sugar or corn syrup. The ingredient statement lists only “honey.” Under section 402(b) of the FD&C Act, a food is adulterated if any valuable constituent has been omitted in whole or in part , if any substance has been substituted wholly or in part, or i f any substance has been added so as to reduce the quality of the food or make it appear to be better or of greater value than it is. In this case, the food is represented as honey when another sweetener (e.g., sugar or corn syrup) has been substituted in part for honey. Products that contain only honey and no other ingredients are considered more valuable than a food that contains both honey and sugar or both honey and corn syrup. 3 Therefore, we would consider such product adulterated under section 402(b)(1) of the FD&C Act because a valuable constituent (honey) has been omitted in part ; under section 402(b)(2) of the FD&C Act , because a substance (sugar or corn syrup) has been substituted in part ; and/or under section 402( b)(4) of the FD&C Act , because a substance (sugar or corn syrup) has been added to the honey so as to increase its bulk or weight or make it appear better or of greater value than it is. 3 Honey is more valuable than other sweeteners. See “Sugar and Sweeteners Yearbook Tables,” United States Department of Agriculture Economic R esearch Service. 2017 . Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data - products/sugar -and -sweeteners -yearbook -tables.aspx . 8 Further, we would consider such food misbranded under section 403 of the FD&C Act due to improper labeling of the food: i.e. , the name of the food and the ingredient statement (see Case A and Q&A 5
    3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. @ Danford Smith: The words and common conceptions of consciousness and other words like spiritual are frequently used to by people to appear as if they understand things that they don't. They are both quite ambiguoius terms to begin with. Take your implication that consciousness is somehow synonimous with thinking. Many people would disagree with that and tell you that in their opinion consciousness is the matrix in which thinking takes place. Some would even tell you that consciousness and thinking are in opposition in that thinking is sequential and associative while consciousness is not either of these. Some would tell you there is a difference between consciousness and self-consciousness as it is generally referred to, as in, "the boy was so shy and self-conscious that he found it impossible to approach a woman." Some would tell you that consciousness is an emergent function that only developed because it had profound survival advantages. Others would tell you that animals are conscious in that they are perceptive and that consciousness was just an adjunct of perception known as apperception. Carlos Dwa would tell you, "The inherent deception in all conceptions of consciousness is the suffix "ness". This is sometimes referred to as the "ness" lock monster." And because of these two lines, I kinda think that Dwa knows more about this slippery notion of consciousness than all the rest put together. But then that's just me. And then of course there is the always (well really sometimes much more than others) popular Cosmic Consciousness, Christ Consciousness, Higher Consciousness Expanded Consciousness, Enhanced Consciousness, and all manner of the like, and in opposition to them is the quite resourceful and adaptable Consensus Consciousness, Mundane Consciousness, and Walking Around Consciousness -- frequently referred to by those in the know as "sleep" which as it happens is pretty much unconscious pretty much most of the time. I think Dwa got it right, there are things that are conscious but there is nothing real that the noun consciousness represents. There is conscious but no consciousness, the whole idea is just blatant social climbing by cellular aggregates : ) Or could be that the subconscious or unconscious just needed someone to keep it company and to blame for it's bone-headed mistakes. Could be the magical term of the moment that means so much that it is meaningless.
    3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826.  @donHooligan  Why would I, I gave up all meat and dairy to help the planet and I love meat, seafood, and especially ice cream. Haven't had any for thirty years and I am the most healthy seventy year old I know. And I am totally convinced that it is the reason that I can still keep it up all night at my age. I drive an EV despite the fact that I love sports cars. I only use clean energy and little of it. I kayak to work (just kidding, but I can drop in twenty feet from my back door.) And I post things like this on a continual basis just so people have some facts to make a decision on. That would be stuff like this: The biggest single factor in climate change is the generation of greenhouse gases. Far more greenhouse gases are produced by animal agriculture than any other source (87% by animal ag as compared to 13% by all other sources: cars, planes, electric plants, etc.: combined) The focus on burning fossil fuels is important, but diversionary. Animal agriculture is the elephant shi$$ing in the room, and it includes the massive burning of fossil fuels in it's production and transport technologies. The most important thing a person can do to address climate change, as an individual, is to stop buying the products of animal agriculture, such as meat, dairy products (no Ben and Jerry's does not get a pass) leather goods, and furs. If enough people do this, we will survive, if not, our grandchildren will be forced to decide if they should eat their babies in the hope of surviving a few more weeks when crops fail globally. That's the choice: do we indulge our blind instinctive desires and rationalize them with self-centered reactive opinions, or do we leave future generations a planet worth living on? Or do we just go on fruitlessly bitching about the injustice of things, and put off acting until it's beyond too late. My personal bet is that the vast majority of us, even if convinced of the dire reality of the global climate situation, will go on with our rapacious lifestyles unabated. Even so, those are the facts. Now -- are we rational moral beings, or just mad machines that really have no control over ourselves?
    3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. Blinding flash of the obvious: People are motivated to become police because they like to push people around and do not want to have to pay the natural consequences, and they don't really want to work, like a roofer or delivery guy which is about what most police qualify for as far as intelligence and education (in the USA). The police problem is much deeper than you address, but the issue you discuss is the bed rock of a rotten system, designed to alienate teens and create an ongoing population of people who detest the hypocrisy of the law as it really functions, and place police in an adversarial relationship to the public. With the exception of the PA state police, who have always behaved professionally in my experience, every cop I have ever run into (on duty) was basically an authoritarian personality who did not give a shit about truth or facts, and when I was a teenagers several just totally made up traffic charges against me, because my car was too cool and my girlfriend too hot. So this was their petty way of trying to bring me down. When I was growing up, most of the police in my hometown actually walked beats and several refused to wear firearms (not because they were wimps). Now in the same small town, the police are militarized, if you do not come to a complete stop, for instance, three squad cars will be involved in your ticketing, and all the while, police who are no longer community residents, but outsiders, act in a totally obnoxious manner, such as shinning their spot lights in your rear view mirrors to blind you while you are searching for your documents. If their obnoxious behavior is questioned the will reply that it is for their own protection. I will note that no policeman has ever been attacked or harmed in this small PA town, ever, and the truth of the matter is that a job as a Amazon delivery driver is twice as dangerous as the average police job and that of a roofer is four time more dangerous, yet they manage to do their jobs without acting like teenage morons. God help the person who does not submit to every order by these guys, at the very least they will find themselves owning hundreds and hundreds of dollars for fines of violations that are totally contrived, or like some have found out, if the authority of these maniacs that use their petty authority to aggrandize their egos is questioned they may be beaten to a pulp and then told that if they say anything they will be charged will all manner of crimes. I personally have had police just make-up evidence and lie on the stand against me for things like pot possession in the seventies and driving offenses in the sixties at least four times in my short seventy three years on the planet. On the other hand, I have never needed a cop for anything, and anytime I reported a theft or vandalism, nothing was done about it. So over a lifetime of observation, I would say that you are totally correct: the police we have are with few exceptions, the wrong types for the job. Nothing will ever be done about this, because the current is in the other direction. Police are far more "equal" than the average person, and can literally murder people and get away with it almost all of the time. This is what the power elite wants. They do not want a bunch of helpful public servants, they want people who will not hesitate to kill on command. And these bastards are interchangeable, a cop in the Kremlin is no more an asshole than a cop in Waco and possibly less of one. A lot of them just want to shoot someone, to give them psychological satisfaction and release. They are so more than equal that killing one of their dogs is treated like killing a human, and they will murder you is you try to defend yourself from a K9 attack. This is not conjecture it is the state of affairs.
    3
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. Dan Dennet and some of his atheist associates have been backing the hypothesis that a course in comparative religion, taught at the high school level, would quite painlessly lead to lots less true believers.  Personally I believe it would be more effective to teach it during grade-school then again in a more sophisticated form in high school.  This would allow kids to ridicule the various lies of other religions in the fun yet direct way that only kids have.  Then as they get the influx of hormones and become teens, they can turn this sense of irony and humor on their parents religion, should they be so unlucky as to be stuck with some kind of fundamentalist parents. It is really too bad that humans generally equate a native sophistication and depth of their quite physical limbic system, with what they refer to as "spiritual" and about which, similar to the dynamics of the more recent use of the word "consciousness" anyone can say any kind of nonsense and there is a good chance no one will call them out on their ignorance. Here is a fun fact to confront a true believer in the Bible with.  For all intents and purposes, the current actions of ISIL are near identical to the actions taken by the ancient "Israelites"   I think the man's name was Joshua, and if memory serves, when he moved against his neighbors, the Israelites would slay all the men, sell the women into slavery, and take the virgin girls for brides.  And of course take their land and possessions, but sometimes the madness even extended to killing all the animals. They, like ISIL, said that God told them to do it.
    2
  861. 2
  862. Democracy Now is Consistently the most coherent and courageous voice in the legitimate news media. We are all waiting for the next 9/11 that these retrograde de-evolutionary anti American bastards who wrap themselves in the flag will pull. Let's use the power of Deep MInd to destroy them this time. As Robert Mercer is using the power of AI to destroy us, so that he and the Koch brothers don't have to pay taxes on their booty. These idiot savants are replacing a golden future of humanity that is near at hand, with their own insane and inane vision. Campaign Finance is the lynch pin. Mercer knows that and that is why he attacked you by decreasing your political value by backing such scams as Citizens United and the hydra of fake institutions that spread his poison. As long as they maintain the present system of legalized corruption of our elections through campaign contributions and actions that would be illegal had not these same interests changed the laws to make their criminal activities legal. It's time to cut through all this, they can deflect us endlessly with the incredible wealth that they have actually stolen from each and every one of us, and brainwashed the dimmer among us to fight in their behalf. They are masters of the illusion of legitimate power, anddo have some power, as long as they can pay gunmen, enough to overcome their qualms about shooting their own, or just hire psychopaths who see a police career as a way to exercise their desire to kill and destroy others without the natural consequences. All money must be taken out of politics. It is not normal to believe that someone who seeks a position of power is a good person. The worst persons seek power, the best have to be dragged to it. Why do so many think that leaders should be revered? Look at all those glowing faces in Trumps crowds, some of them weren't paid, aren't millionaire thieves who will personally benefit from his kleptocracy and are cheering against their own best interests. Yes a lot of them are stupid, and that is why we have Trump, stupid people along with everyone else was given a choice by Goldman Sach in the last election, and that choice was, "Would you rather live in piss or shit?", and they chose shit.
    2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. I know that the unenlightened have a bunch of rules that they have made up regarding how someone who has awakened should behave. Since there is no chance that anyone will come to know who I am, I am unconcerned with these "guidelines". I did not say that psychedelic drugs can never be of any benefit to an individual.  They may, They may not. I simply said that psychedelic experiences are not the same as a true awakening.  They simply are not.  I have experienced plenty of psycho active drugs back in the sixties and seventies especially, and I would have believed that an experience of awakening would be similar, in fact I did believe that for a decade or so, until I found out in quite spectacular fashion that they are not nearly the same thing.  Not even close, not even in the same world. Of course as to whether or not I knowist of whence I speak, that is something that will be determined in the mind of the reader of this little note.  If you like what I am saying you will believe it, if not you won't.  The human mind is really as simple as that in regards to such matters. But rather than going on about my own experience in such matters, which I can bring about without drugs, now very easily and which resemble psychedelic experiences only in the degree to which they are different than the stupor that is commonly referred to as waking consciousness, rather than that I will simply quote one of my favorite authors on the subject -- Carlos Dwa Of Molecules and Men As is evident to anyone who has the feel for what has gone on in the so to say “new-age” movement – (for want of a better moniker) for what was largely the fall-out from a tidal influx of psychedelic availability to college and high-school students, eventually resulted in a glut of seekers of one stripe or another. People who were convinced that there was something beyond the consensus parallax of the herd, of the rigidly controlled national mass media (admittedly there were many more independent and mom and pop newspapers and radio stations compared to today, where clear channel and other corporations, like Fox and GE own almost all the significant media venues, but such is not the topic under scrutiny just now.) For the first time in the history of mankind, that is recorded, we had large numbers of persons with little or no pertinent frame of reference, or preparation, and sometimes not even a salubrious setting in which to undertake such a voyage into the unknown, blasting themselves (ready or not) into intense psychedelic experiences. Of course there was the corporate media's disinformation about the whole scene: sort of an unholy melange of predatory capitalism and psychotic projection of the unconscious fear of seeing oneself without all the comfy civilized buffers they had erected. And there was a social reaction that was out of all proportion to the danger posed by such psychoactive substances. Or as Leary observed, “LSD is a psychoactive compound capable of causing psychotic reactions in persons who have never taken it.” Of course mankind had traditionally used recreational molecules for more serious purposes, no need to get into the living ethnobotanical information systems to be found in the mosaic of brujos and their apprentices, or the mystics and their secret rites and mystery schools, sometimes something real for their respective culture was to be found in them, sometimes not. Many of the people who's lives were impacted by the consumption of the psychedelics, realized at some point, that though they did indicate latent potentials within man, they were in themselves a dead-end, other than for intermittent recreational use. But many people continued to believe that the states offered by various psychotropic compounds reflected unused potentials within the human organism. There are many different informed opinions, such as that of Alexander Shulgin the rediscovered of Ecstasy and a former lead chemist for Dow who has had a decades long study and has tested hundreds of different psychoactive compounds legally on human subjects, his theory is that: since the metabolic pathways that these molecules activate are present, but the substances themselves are for the most part missing (of course DMT has been found in all body tissues, but in very low doses, well below the threshold of notice) Alexander contends that these compounds are something that humans used to be able to produce but they have lost the capacity and are no longer able to make them. There are other views on why this is the case, my view is that we are still able to produce them, under the right conditions, with the requisite intention and know-how (a very peculiar kind of know-how since there are no words or thoughts involved in either the knowing or the practical application of what is “known”. But even this, is not our stop on this gorgeous Saturday afternoon. But I almost spoke too soon, because here is our stop now. We are wondering, well some of us are, just what is the relationship between some of the stronger, more archetypical psychedelics, and the living expression of enhanced consciousness that arrives without the use of external molecules? I mean there must be something there right? (this is a rhetorical question, not an affirmation). Thousands of people have written about the similarities of psychedelic experiences and the classic descriptions of the enlightened mind (forgive the apparent oxymoron). I could say something like, “I suggest to you. . .” to sound more politically correct. It hardly seems worth it, and for those for whom this description is anything more than an amusing novelty, it is totally unnecessary. What are the similarities of mescaline and an expansion that comes about without the use of psychedelic molecules? What is the comparison of it to LSD, DMT,psilocybin, etc.? I will admit that there is something that a natural awakening has in common with all of the aforementioned substances: It is as totally different from habitual, consensus, herd-awareness, as is the peak of, not some watered down x or some other post-historic mini dose like are now common in the rave and disco scene, but a full blown, psychedelic experience from a full dose of the respective hallucinogen. Natural awakening is AS different from pedestrian forms of consciousness as a 300microgram LSD trip is from watching the news on TV. But that is the only thing they have in common. I am gonna repeat that, so that any reader will realize that I mean exactly what is written. There is nothing else similar about them. Some people will be drawn toward philosophical contemplation on these drugs, that is related also, but only in a secondary ancillary manner, and a person on these drugs may not feel like that at all. On the other hand a natural awakening will move a person into the very center of, not thoughts and words of contemplation, one couldn't say a word or have a thought if one's life depended on it, but one is moved by a luscious luminous torrent: expanded into the cool living flame of contemplation without words or thoughts. This is NOT the booby prize (where enlightenment is the realization that there is no such thing as enlightenment.) Oh, no, not even close. OK, I do admit that realizing that there is no such thing as enlightenment is a large step closer to it than believing that any ideas or thoughts you have about it as a subject have anything to do with the reality of it at all. So in that sense, realizing that what you have been striving for and sucking up disinformation about, is an illusion, is clearer than not knowing it is illusion, but knowing this, is no closer to the reality of this thing, it's just less far away. © 2012 Carlos Dwa
    2
  866. By the way, for your information, yoga is not the original means of natural awakening.  And further, if you are referring to yoga as it is known in the west, as postures etc. as opposed to the tantric traditions, it has nothing to do with it at all.  But then neither does anything else.  No one can magically enlighten someone else.  No one is permanently enlightened, it is something you have to do every day.  After you wake up, you have to wake up again.  No one can tell you anything about it that is accurate.  This is one of the only things it has in common with intense psychedelic experiences: it is truly indescribable, but it is not confused at all.  It fits humans perfectly, unlike experiences brought about by various poisons used as drugs.  In fact there is something slimy and hideous about tripping on drugs in comparison.  But if you don't really have that comparison, you cannot know this, or in what sense it is true.  When you actually have the physical choice of "Why would I want to do this? (drugs of the psychedelic variety)  When I can do this. (awaken to a higher cosmic intelligence and consciousness without poisoning myself) then you also would agree with what you now disagree with.  It's only your mind holding you back -- forget about it. Every thought you think you are having about it is wrong, and not just a little -- as totally incorrect as is possible, because every thought that anyone has ever had or will ever have about it is wrong, it cannot be a subject.  
    2
  867. righthatter4life I did happen to mention that someone's best chance is to find someone who can actually activate the system I refer to and interact with them.  But I think that there is slim chance that that is a possibility.  That may seem a bit unfair, but what is fair about millions of sperm dying so that one can make it to the egg?  What is unfair about thousands of sea turtles dying so that one or two can make it to adulthood?  What is fair about the fact that so few people actually understand quantum mechanics even though much of our present technology is based upon it?  What is unfair about these things?  . . . Nothing.  Fairness is a concept of the mind and human culture, awakening is not, it is purely physical -- purely primal.   There is no one on earth and there never has been who can tell you what you want to know in the way that you want to know it.  No one can tell someone else how to awaken, simply because anything that is said about it is misleading and incorrect.  That is because, it is entirely beyond the mind, your questions are wrong, in the same sense as is pointed to in the Zen koan in which a master (someone who has had the grande experience and hasn't gone nutz or started a church or something, and has made some inroads into actually understanding what happened and how to increase their ability to remain in this functional mode and bring it about in themselves) is asked if a dog has the Buddha nature.  His answer was mu -- which meant "Your question is wrong."  Another example of a wrong question would be for you to demand I tell you if the elephant in my room is orange or madras.  You could go into a gym and use a forklift to pick up the weights.  It doesn't matter how many times you do this or how strange and impressive it may seem, a person will never develop the muscles necessary to lift the weight if they don't use the system that can respond and adapt to this end.  Among those lost in what they believe to be their minds, their opinion, their concepts and thoughts, sarcasm and irony can pinch-hit for intelligence. Thanks for the well-wishing, I didn't anticipate that you would like what I had to say, but then again it wasn't really said in response to you, but in response to the slim possibility that someone with not only the potential, but the passion to awaken would come across this sometime.  Personally I have nothing to sell, and there is nothing that I want from anyone, other than what is necessary for physical existence.  That is why I come right out and say things that those who have never in their lives been outside of their mechanical automatic functioning, and don't even realize it, have established in their wisdom, is unbecoming for an enlightened one to do or say.  The whole concept of an "enlightened one" is total bull.  No matter how awake someone is capable of being in a cosmic sense, they are just a blond one away from being as ordinary as any Joe Shmoe, at every moment.  All they have to do is start thinking again, or writing, or talking, or believing and identifying with the thoughts that automatically flow through them.  I know for instance that when I was in the depth of my own psychonaut activities with regard to these molecules, it would have cleared a lot of things up for me if I had run into someone like I now am.  Sorry you don't like the facts about my experience, most who claim some knowledge about such matters will immediately be compelled to disagree with me -- to the same extent to which they are firmly in the arms of their automatic mental functioning, and firmly believing that they are the thoughts that run through them.
    2
  868. 2
  869. ctually that is a typo it should read "What chance would he have of anything real anyway?" > What do you mean by real? If ones aim is to awaken, then language can be precise because everthing is realtive to this one aim.  In this sense real is what a person is able to do.  Can one modify their conscious experience in such a manner as to evoke insight and ecstasy? A person who is dependent on external recreational molecules to alter their real-time experience cannot do this.  If they could, quite simply, they would not be taking drugs -- excepts possibly for fun on occasion -- or real physical pain.  The experiences provided by the phsychadelic family of drugs provide a distorted reflection of what a real activation of these capacities is like, but it is extremely distorted and anyone who has experience the perfectly apt nature of real awakening would not waste their time on such dead-ends.  Go on over to one of the web sites that is centered on drug experiences: confusion reigns: people are ripe to believe any nonsense about "entities" and whatever that someone is ready to spue.  They are confused because what they experiences has extreme impact with no comprehension of the territory, and the territory was seen through a lense with fatal disorting qualities. Remember: this is all relative to awakening, and fatal means the end of this possibility -- at least until they wise up. So in this sense real means something one can really DO. >I know you know that most people are insanely stupid. If you are stupid, then you are going to be bored with your mind. What was written was that people are insanely bored with their own minds.  Which is quite a different thing than what you are talking about.  The more intelligent a person, the more chance that they are bored with their mind and so it is diverted endlessly, but it matters not a bit if it is diverted by sudying Synthetic Biology or watching two guys cause future brain injury to each other in UFC.  Remember it matters not a bit with regard to awakening, not some imagined absolute value.  Just as it matters not one bit if someone spends their lives taking drugs everyday, to the matter of awakening, it awakening is not thier goal.  If it is however, everything changes, then it matters. It is real and physical, and chemical, no doubt, but it is not just taking these molecules, it is the act of producing them internally endogenously, which is the key, because each breakthrough is the resutlt of a fundamental insight into the nature of one's existence, and life in general. It seems there is a process of evolving, and the process is delightful, until one actually awakens and finds that nothing, including the process of awakening, and anything ever said or thought about it by anyone including the worlds first ranked spiritual heros, has anything at all to do with it.  Except in a negative sense that one can say, what it is not, or what detracts or keeps people unaware. > I get the feeling that you who onto the belief that every human mind is capable of real enlightenment. I happen to disagree. Your feeling is incorrect.  No human mind is capable of enlightenment, and as long as the process which is regarded as the mind, in our culture, is active, awakening is impossible.  That is, as long as what Dwa refers to as the "thought-centric-mind is identified with, awakening is impossible. >You've done these drugs and didn't have a great experience. Where did you get the idea that anyone didn't have a great experience?  Just sort of assumed it? At the time I thought LSD, shrooms, dmt, STP, and expecially peyote were great, and was quite an advocate of them. > Why are you so confident in your beliefs? Is you ability to reach out and grab something with your hand a belief?  Surely even though concepts and word are used to describe the ability one may have to grab something with their hand, you realize that the act of grabbing is in no way dependent on the ability to explain the act in words.  Though these expressions are conceptual and wordy the act of awakening has nothing to do with beliefs, or words, or any half-assed explanation that anyone may give about it. So it seems that everyone of your statements and questions were not based on anything that was actually written or implied.  Keep this in mind if you have any further statements or questions that do not receive a response. It's rater simple really.  This is your situation: It is as if you are in a roadside dinner late at night perhaps a Waffle House.  You are sitting at the counter minding your own business but you can't help overhearing the person further down the counter who is extolling the virtues of his new Corvette to the world at large. Holding forth on its superior qualities. There is a flash of headlights in the windows as a car pulls into the Waffle House parking lot, and a stranger enters and sits between you and the Corvette man, whom is still holding forth on the qualities of his ride. This goes on for another half cup of coffee or so until the Corvette man says, "The corvette is the equal of any supercar on the market.  There is virtually no difference between a Corvette and a Bugatti Veron Super Sport. At which point the stranger that entered says, "I used to own the exact model of Corvette that you are talking about, and I also own a Veron Super Sport and I assure you the only thing similar about them is they both have four wheels." Now the decision that you have, is to decide whether or not you believe the stranger.  Maybe if you like what he said you will believe him, if not you won't.  But the woman sitting at a booth by the window believes him because her view into the parking lot is not obscured by her own reflection in the windows like yours is, and she can see the Veron parked outside.  In this metaphor windows equals words.
    2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. The death and disaster you speak of is caused by the laws against opioids not the opioids. You are a dupe of propaganda. This whole subject is the babble of the insane puritanical conditioning of the populace by the psychopaths that are in control. These laws create a climate in which people turn to street drugs and the hell our laws hand to them. It is insane to think that prohibition works. It does not work and it has never worked. Even in countries with death penalties for use and sale of drugs, it does not work. Opioids are one of the most benign drugs you can use long term. Less harmful than common over the counter drugs that the fools who believe these laws take regularly. Switzerland solved their heroin problem by making it freely available to addicts. What happened? They self titrated and went back to work instead of being out on the street trying to come up with the money for dealers.  This whole problem is self-created. Perhaps we should return to the ultra insane times when doctors and loved ones would withhold pain meds from those in their care who were dying in agony, because they did not want them to become addicted in the final months of their lives. This used to happen all the time, not so long ago. I witnessed it happen to a beloved great aunt when I was a teenager. Anyone who supports this policy is an idiot and thinks that doing the same thing that doesn't work over and over again is a good idea. Why were opioids made illegal in the first place? Because the miners and other factory serfs in England began to prefer tinctures of opium as opposed to alcohol. With good reason. So of course the distillers demonized the use of same. While the facts are that opioids are far less harmful than alcohol or even than tylenol. If you don't know these facts, and I suspect you do not. You basically know nothing about what you have commented on. Which is par for the course on the net. If you really dislike drug dealers, both criminal and noncriminal, then you should be in favor of complete decriminalization of all molecules, and the sanction for anyone to grow any plant they want to and use it themselves, like any free adult should be able to do. Then a person could grow a little plot of poppies and treat their own pain.
    2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. ​ @tibsyy895  Old tropes. The Teslas coming out of Germany will offer the highest precision of any mass produced car on earth. If you actually followed the owners who talk about their own Teslas, you would know that you are the victim of the media FUD, union hit jobs, and the unimaginable hate and resistance of traditional OEMs and especially dealerships that will lie and build up any minor negative about Tesla to attempt to sabotage a superior product in the weak minded. You basically have no real idea what you are talking about. Tesla is a generation of engineering beyond any other EV manufacturer, and that is a fact. Tesla does not need to advertise to sell every car they make at a profit beyond all other major OEMs. Their customers sell them for them. Tesla customers frequently say that their Tesla is their absolute favorite possession, and that they are continually thrilled by the fact that it is often improved OTA on a weekly basis. People like you have been predicting the fall of Tesla since the beginning. The facts on the ground could not be more out of line with the FUD you have picked up from the media. Tesla does not give free cars to auto magazine staff, or all expense paid junkets to visit a resort and see the new, fill in the blank, which are special magazine cars specially built by hand to get reviews. This is knowm -- child. Or maybe you depend on the financial or auto press or broadcasters whose sole raison d'etre is to sell advertising space or time. And Tesla will not pay the hundreds of millions that they get from all other OEMs. You figure it out. If your are capable.
    2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. I can imagine an alternative that is outside of the usual: capitalism, communism, socialism, anarchism ruts. OK well anarchism may not be a rut, and in a sense it is almost as if an underlying subtle substrate of anarchism may be both present and necessary for the vitality of the other isms, but it seems to me that a purely anarchist state, or region, if you prefer, would be at the mercy of nations that are otherwise organized. First of all, I mention in the spirit of full disclosure that I find government and it's mechanics boring, and somehow grey and depressing, and consider the people who have a desire to acquire temporal power over the physical existence of others as sick, deeply self-deluded individuals. I think that in general our leaders, in whatever flavor basically suck ass when it comes to administering a government. We are told that governments are the most dangerous entities on earth, not to other governments or other peoples, but to their own people. But of course it is not governments, no matter the formal codification of society in the form of laws and regulations, but the people who enact same, supposedly for the benefit of society, but more realistically in the service of their own organically pragmatic predilections, whether apparent as in the case of libertarians, and various utilitarian movements, or subtle and convoluted and perhaps even unconscious as on the part of various idealists, and utopians. Anyway, enough of this and to the point. I suggest a governing system in which the body of government employees, whether a janitor or the chief executive, is chosen by testing and continual performance review. Sort of a Techno-Neo Confucianism where anyone who is able to score higher on a series of tests that are generated by machine learning logarithms to optimize a governing system that is entirely relative to an established constitution or declaration of stated national goals, such as the optimal health wealth and well-being of all citizens or the earliest possible establishment of an extra-planetary colony that is self-sustaining, or some other orientation or constellation of orientations that is established by and modified by the adult populace with varying degrees of voting powers, which degree would also be determined by a test designed to test the intelligence, knowledge and correlation to reality of their internal conceptions. They would be voting directly only for the goals and general prime directives of the nation and not the leaders or manner in which these goals are pursued except in so far as they have established restrictions on such pursuits, such as environmental regulations and standards of dignity and freedom regarding all individuals. New and future technology will allow earthlings to establish a society that is superior to any that humans themselves are capable of designing the social and physical dynamics and details of. Thusly the human race will expand into the limitless resources of the solar system and beyond, to evolve in concert with our technology to a destiny which is presently beyond the capacity of even the most creative futurist to imagine. In such a system, the tests for positions of higher responsibility would be complex and not limited to written exams, but would include virtual reality scenarios, real world assessment and performance review, as well as extreme depth of psychological testing. I might add that in regard to such "higher" positions it may well be determined and required that it would be necessary for them to experience a mental state of awareness that is beyond the consensus thought-centric and quite mechanical mental processes of humanity, whether by psychedelic agents or some other mode of transcendence. In addendum: democracies do work, I should say "can work", this is illustrated by the fact that if a problem is too complex, such as guessing the number of jellybeans in a huge urn. If enough people guess, say tens of thousands, the median of all the guesses is always more accurate than any single guess. Ok theoretically a single guess can be just as, or more accurate than the median of all guesses, but not very friggen often and it is just luck. Now if you have some agency that obscures the urn or finds a means of exaggerating certain qualities or merely using persuasion to misrepresent the number of jelly beans this will obviously fuck things up. This is analogous to the present state of the world with regard to the disinformation and propaganda generated by all manner of sources like Fox News, or any news outside of peer reviewed journals and even then. . . . So of course in this society, as it should be in ours, the penalty for knowingly reporting inaccurate information as fact would be death. No excuses.
    2
  1011. Native only means you were born there. Like native New Yorker. No thousand year history or cultural distinction necessary einsteins. The real language manipulation by the woke puddin' heads is the use of the word "indigenous"to refer to the native descendants of the invasive species of humans,such as in the case of the Asians who migrated into the Americas. Their are actually no indigenous humans anywhere on earth. Even the small population of people living in the original lands where man is assumed to have originated are not indigenous, in other words their is no uninterrupted continuum from the original humans who originated in the location, to those that now inhabit the area. In the the woke narrative only the descendants of the invasive species of homo sapiens that populated an area before other more technologically advanced groups supplanted them are actually indigenous while in fact they were merely the descendants of migrants who could not compete with the newer more advanced migrants. The same thing happened all over the world continuously over the course of human history, those with an advantage over the native inhabitants, supplanted, enfolded, or destroyed the more archaic groups. The original human populations of Europe were themselves displaced by other more technologically and/or militarily viable groups, in an ongoing series of displacements that continue even today. Humans always pressed any advantage to take what they wanted or needed to enhance the survival potential of their group. This has always included rationalized narratives to justify their destruction of native cultures. The narrative used by the present migrants into western culture is just another such device crafted by those whom believe that said migration will benefit themselves: to enhance their survival potential even if that perception is only political or in error.
    2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. Concerning aerial surveillance: It is certain that EVERY person who attended a demonstration's identity is known by the NSA and other intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Also know is where they where before they attended the protest and possibly where they were before that, and where they went after the protest, for as long as they want to know about you, right up to present. It's not magic, it's not rocket science, it is cheap and easy to do, because of current computer tech. Here is how it's done: There is a plane, or drone in the air. It is recording the entire city at once with scopes capable of thermal imaging that is controlled by apps that automatically label every heat signature that it sees. So every living thing is labeled. This brilliant program will then continue to keep all the thousands or tens of thousands of labels associated with it's appropriate heat signature. By rewinding to the part of the recording done before the protest it can then usually associated each individual heat signature with an exact address. Same thing going forward in time, it can follow each label to where ever it goes after the demonstration. Of course this is all tied in with cctv and facial recognition apps that automatically correlate data. This information is kept forever, and now, thanks to Bernie Sanders they can legally have inference engines sort though all your internet and digital communications and if you post anything like I did here. You are watched, and possibly set-up if you seem to actually merit the trouble, or if they need a fall-guy, or are looking for likely candidates for entrapment to further their personal careers.
    2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. The idea that Biden cares about climate change is an illusion. No company or other individual entity has done more to address the climate issue than Tesla Inc. Biden is and has done everything he can to hobble Tesla. He just put a member of TESLAQ in charge of auto safety in the NHTSA. Guess his union political associates wanted someone who would hobble Tesla while they tried to catch up. They will never catch up to Tesla and they know it that is why they are attacking them politically. M Cummings owns $900,000 of stock in a lidar company that is a direct competitor of Tesla. Her (not so) irrational hatred for Tesla is motivated by her stock market bets. She intends to hobble the only American auto manufacturer that has a chance to compete with the coming Chinese wave of excellent EVs. Cars that far surpass what the traditional ICE companies are grudgingly STARTING to consider significant to their bottom line, ONLY because Tesla Inc forced them to. If you don't really care about this you don't understand how this will effect everyone. It is the definition of corruption to undermine an ethical, profitable, company that has just added 10,000 new jobs in Texas alone, by putting an irrational, and personally financially biased person in charge of controlling the company that had done the most to abate the climate crisis on all fronts, no matter what the kneejerk, woke, haters of all things successful outside of their constricted partisan purview espouse. THE VENERABLE Sandy Munro's comments: (A man whose expertise is in manufacturing efficiency, and optimal real-world engineering is proven by his accomplishments): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQATlYrOoLU&t=19s SIGN THE PETITION HERE (and check out other petitions you may care about): https://www.change.org/p/president-of-the-united-states-review-appointment-of-missy-cummings-to-nhtsa-for-conflict-of-interest-bias?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_31120814_en-US%3A3&recruiter=1230225823&recruited_by_id=13ce45d0-31c0-11ec-8459-37defe292f81&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_initial
    2
  1085. 2
  1086. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The Americdan Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. You are correct. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. Interesting question about Tesla. For some reason, and I have no idea why: Tesla is the only OEM manufacturing in China that is totally publicly owned and is not a partner with the Chinese gov. They are presently enlarging the Chinese factory, after having taken it off line last summer for improvements which apparently increased its output tremendously. CATL is also construction a battery factory next to Tesla in China, apparently for Tesla's use. Considering the financial media's hyperbolic attitude about every possible negative about Tesla, I wouldn't doubt that we will see much made of it, and little real difference, other than in the stock market, and that will be temporary. Right now there are over a dozen Chinese EVs exported to Europe, many of them wear storied European marques like BMW, or MG, or Volvo, but are really Made in China an in many cases majority owned by the Chinese gov. All the European sales from all the Chinese EVs sold in Europe amount to about the same as the numbers of Chinese manufactured Teslas sold in Europe. I expect this will change dramatically as the Berlin gigafactory ramps up. Tesla does not import Chinese manufactured cars into the USA, so no real difference there. Recently wrong-hand drive Teslas have showed up in Austrailia and New Zealand, and despite the Chinese factory continuing to be unable to fill the orders, an unfounded rumor that demand had fallen off in China caused Tesla stock to plummet two weeks ago. The financial and even regular news media has been attempting to coerce Tesla into handing over the advertising vig for years. What are a few thousand outright lies and slanted analysis compared to the prize, if they can bully Tesla into advertising to protect it from scum journalism? To put this in perspective: GM alone spent over 2.2billion dollars for advertising last year. Tesla spent none: you can figure it out. The media says one thing, but the facts on the ground say "outpreformed again" under all present less than optimal circumstances.
    2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. Democracy cannot work, it can only seem to be working if the body politic is continually bombarded with disinformation: from any source. Anyone who spreads lies through mass media should be stripped of all wealth, publicly caned, and banished. What is true and what is not true should only be determined by proven science and physical evidence. We should bring back the "equal time" laws that Reagan got rid of. You youngsters may not know it, but in the sixties and seventies if anyone gave a political opinion on TV, the stations were legally obligated to provide free broadcast time for any and all opposing opinions. All opinions should be clearly declared to be opinions like this one, and the one on this video. At the very least there should be a score that appears at the head of all communications through mass media reflecting the previous accuracy of the source or venue. This could be similar to the review scores on retail sites. Politics sucks ass. Isn't it apparent to everyone by now that our political system is an archaic artifact? An artifact based on humanities inability to escape it's bestial warlike nature . . . :campaigns, winner take all victories, leaders who neither lead (excepting the advancement of the concerns of their patrons) nor have the wisdom to make intelligent impartial decisions on the issues of the day. This political web of deceit is a self-perpetuating parasite that warps collective social culture and is itself continually warped due to shameful self-interested exploitation by those who control the economy through control of debt manipulation. Interests and principalities that spew false narratives which have contaminated every aspect of our expectations of daily life, and our future aspirations (or lack of them). I suggest to you that there are other alternatives. Far more efficient alternatives, that would benefit the whole of society and reduce the corruption that is not only a systemic disease of our political system, but is now the very sinew, marrow, and circulatory system, of a body politic that has done everything possible to free itself from both morality and justice: through legislative and legal complexities, technicality, outright lies, and all manner of fuckery. It is time to evolve folks. Like a cool pool on a hot day, once you take the plunge it's refreshing and rejuvenating, but before you take that plunge there is hesitation and a resistance to a state change. And we must change the state of our state unless we consider moving into the future by looking through a rear-view mirror and stepping on our own dicks every step of the way while perpetually bitching about it to be some kind of desirable human prerogative. Because as it is, it will never be able to meet our real human needs or provide anything more than updated reruns of the same old conundrums. If human culture and civilization is to advance it must evolve to a higher state, a higher system of state, which will nurture higher states of mind in the populace, not continually drag it back by aggravating the primal survival instinct in a technological environment wherein this instinct is counterproductive on numerous levels. I suggest to you that a body politic based on a NeoConfusian Techno-Meritocracy would be so vastly superior: for the state of the state, state of the economy, state of human advancement, and our collective state of mind, that any comparison to the present drunken-knife-fight-in-a-gilded-bordello that passes for our government would be comical.
    2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233.  @Anointed012  There is no "country" outside of the people who inhabit it. There is no United States of America outside of it's citizens. What living Americans do you imagine benefited from slavery or participated in it? Most Americans are from families who immigrated here after slavery was abolished. Even in the south not many people actually owned slaves. If you know real history then you know that almost everyone has ancestors that were slaves or serfs who were not free to leave the land they worked on or travel. Try to understand that: Almost everyone has ancestors that were slaves during one period or another. Why do you think that people who had nothing to do with enslaving others or trading in slaves owe anything to people who like themselves had ancestors who were slaves? Maybe the Italians and the Vatican should give me money because the Romans took some of my ancestors as slaves -- right? Why not? It makes as much sense as you getting something from someone who had nothing to do with the enslavement of your ancestors. Cuba had three times more slaves brought from Africa than the USA. Brazil had five times as many. Should they get reparations too? From who? Other mixed descendants of slaves? How about the vast majority of African American folks who are part white: Do they have to pay themselves reparations? Get real. Most of the African slaves that were taken were taken by other Africans and Arab slavers and sold to the Europeans at the coast or even at islands off the shore of Africa. Why don't you ask Saudi Arabia for reparations? It is most likely Arabs who actually enslaved you ancestors. The Arab raiders took slaves from Europe too. For over two centuries no European coastal town was safe from their slaving raids that went as far north as Iceland. There were so many white slaves being sold in the Jewish run slave markets in northern Africa that it was cheaper to buy new slaves than to care for them and feed them. Almost all were worked to death and left few descendants. But that probably doesn't impact your world view. Get over it.
    2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242.  @ryanmiller1317  I would say it is far more intense than mushrooms. I have never had actual hallucinations on mushrooms. I mean hallucinations where goddesses and demons appeared in the room and interacted with you, or my girlfriends nipples became two whirling sparklers, -- spinning in opposite directions by the way. Or a crimson goddess comes floating ingo the room on a flaming cloud. Or the entire world turns into spinning swastikas one growing out of the last and each resolving it self in ecstasy with little misshapen gnomes jumping out of them into the room. But that may be dose dependent. Shrooms give me a kind of nervous hollow feeling behind the conscious activity. Buttons on the other hand, though far more intense had this protected coddled almost nurtured aspect to them. Strangely enough I also tried San Pedro on a few occasions and it was not the same at all even though it is supposed to be the same active element. Once on San Pedro I just blacked out for hours and apparently just carried on normally. It was like a negative experience, not in a bad sense just in a nothing sense. One time I picked up this Mexican hitchhiker in the Sonoran desert and it turned out he was a brujo of sorts. He offered me these huge fresh peyote buttons after we stopped at a bar and played some pool. It was the only time I ever did fresh buttons. He watched me like a hawk while I ate them, expecting the gringo to be disgusted by the bitter taste. But they tasted fine to me and he found this hilarious. So it may be some kind of personal affinity I have for buttons. Back in the sixties I became convinced that LSD and company would save the world and enlighten people in mass. I was also quite sure that the experience on psychotropics was equivalent to if not synonymous with a state of mystical enlightenment. Then one day while on lunch break when I had a job in a popsicle factory during the summer, I was gazing out a window at a nearby bridge, and I could not possibly describe what happened next but it cured me of that particular assumption. And since then I have had other experiences that just blow psychedelics out of the water, and they were so perfectly apt so natural compared to psychedelics, yet even more extreme.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAOVUo5TYJM
    2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. Everybody (even politicians) knows what's wrong with the political system and have for over fifty years and nothing has been done to change things. The lynch pin of all that is wrong with the USA is campaign finance. All private money must be out of politics entirely. No funds of any kind from the private sector to politicians ever without jail time. What is now "business as usual" was not so long ago criminal activity. All campaign contributions are bribes, all PACs are anti-American. America is now owned by a few families, that is why you have such problems. All billionaires are inherently evil because no one makes and keeps that much money without being a scumbag. Think about it this way. If I gave you a dollar every second for twenty four hours a day it would take about two weeks for me to give you a million dollars. It would take about thirty two years to give you a billion dollars at the same rate. It would take 31,700 years to give you a trillion dollars. When our republic was founded severe restrictions were put upon the establishment of corporations. They had to be for the benefit of the pubic and they were only licensed to operate for thirty years at a time. We are now seeing the reason for this. The founding fathers knew that if wealth concentrated like it had in the hands of the royals and bankers of Europe it would be the end of the power of the people in our democratic constitutional republic. By the way the only real democracy on earth is Switzerland, a place with lots of firearms in civilian hands and no mass shootings. A place where heroin addicts are give drugs in a clinical setting which has no drug lords or junkies ripping off everything that isn't nailed down to support their habits. But we decided to do the same things that don't work over and over. We are idiots.
    2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346.  @santhoshbalakrishnan920  Establishing air dominance over China has nothing to do with the number of microwave ovens the respective combatants manufacture, it has everything to do with the ability to destroy (easily destroy) SAM and medium range missile radar whenever it is foolish enough to turn on, and simultaneously intercept and destroy missiles deployed against US satellites and knock down opposing orbital assets. The USAs new AGMs range is classified but we know it is in excess of 160 miles, probably closer to 200, is able to be carried internally by stealth fighters, let alone bombers, and is able to be launched outside of the range of SAM units by aircraft such as the F15 and then have a target designated by F35s that are closer to the action. I suggest you explore Peter Zeihan's geopolitical assessment of China's future in order to reorganize your hierarchy of priorities regarding such a possible future conflict. China is now frozen out of any purchase of high end semiconductors, which are oh so useful in developing high end weapons systems, and they are quite incapable of designing or manufacturing them themselves. They are no longer even able to buy the machines that are capable of making them. . . . Re-access bro. And if the USA ever really gets it security tightened where will China go to steal weapons tech? What China doesn't realize is they would still be eating tree bark if not for the west opening up investments and intellectual property exports to China. They are have forgotten what's what in the face of believing their own bullshit, and allowing an isolated out of touch man to determine the course of the billions.
    2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 1
  1359. Even though Bernie is a non-practicing Jew, in my opinion he is the first real Christian to run since Jimmy Carter. Morally that is. Think about it. Reagan put on the Christian cloak and he was actually a murderous liar directly responsible for the murder and torture of thousands of innocent villagers in Central America, just to point out one of the reasons he would end up in hell if there was a hell. Bill Clinton claimed to be a man of the people and he was just a lying scoundrel who never really got out of the trailer park. George W objectively should be ranked with other clownish tyrants. He and the other NeoCon idiot wiz kids, corrupted the gov by using the power of the military to ruthlessly murder hundreds of thousands of innocent noncombatants, destroy one of the stable non radical Islamic nations, and make the world a whole lot more like hell than it should ever be. He will probably be put in charge of the hot tubes in hell, because despite his apparent simple-mindedness he was one brutal source of evil and lies during his term, who fucked up America as much and maybe more than JP Morgan JR when he manipulated the American public into WW1 thereby setting the stage for the rise of Hitler, WW2, the communist revolution, and all kinds of evil just because he and his bankster buddies could not bear to lose the millions they had invested in English and French war effort. So we entered a war that the American public had to be brain washed into accepting. Luckily the Council on Foreign Relation happily did this for a fee, and employed the newly discovered techniques of unconscious motivation that Sigmund Freud's nephew Edward Bernais developed. This was the worst thing anyone ever did to America. The propaganda was so good that here we are a hundred years later and even most historiand still don't know that WW1 was caused by the Brits, who had a tradition of just going to war with any business competitors. Gemany had just won a contract to build a railroad line from central Europe into the middle east oil fields that granted them the territory on both sides of the tracks. The Brits started the war in Africa with military actions against the German incursion into what they thought of as their oil fields. Now you know more true American history than 99.9999 percent of the people alive.
    1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. Good Show. Figure out how to make Campaign Finance Reform sexy, and save the nation from the criminal scumbags that are now stealing our nation. If you have two brain cells to rub together you can figure out that the funding of politics is nothing but a system of corruption that was put in place to steal as much as possible for as long as possible. A populist movement cannot win as long as the worst among us: the Mercers, Kochs, and Goldman Sachs minions, control everything through a system of corruption that they themselves have devised. Sure it seems like there are a thousand issues: Trump giving away national assets like Putin did to a bunch of rich unevolved assholes who are proud of their predation upon the populace, and there endless red herrings that get all the single issue voters at one another's throats: climate change, fundamentalist morons who think that the world is six thousand years old and will end tomorrow, wars in support of private business interests, wholesale surveillance of the citizens, a ridiculous number of psychopaths with badges who believe they are licensed to kill, etc. etc. etc. But I am telling you that Robert Mercer understands that the lynch pin of control is campaign finance, that’s why he funds Citizens United, and Britbart, and put Trump in office by giving him key words found by Cambridge Anaylitics to repeat over and over, in near meaningless lies, that the mindless fools that watch and believe Fox New and similar founts of lies were responding to on a limbic level. He knows that campaign finance is the key to power – do you? Until this is done, the present plutocratic kleptocracy will swiftly recover from any temporary setbacks. Sorry if it boars you. It’s not up to your opinion, this is the game theory, this is the facts. Robert Mercer is using the power of AI against the population and government of the USA to make your voice and vote more meaningless than it already is. Campaign finance reform must be done, not because it is somebodies interest or pet interest, but because it is the only thing that CAN be done to stop this avalanche of shit the one percent is burying us under. Goldman Sachs gave the American public a choice in the last election and that choice was, “Would you rather live in shit or piss.” And thanks to 80,000 rust belt fools who were conned by a New York City conman, America chose shit. And until campaign finance is address and totally deprivatized you will only have a choice between shit and piss in all the coming elections. Unless a real populist like Bernie is nominated (don’t hold your breath) as he should have been, and reforms this madness. The shit we are in now is because of the neoliberal idiots who supported and cheated for Hillary and voted for her in the primary even though all the polls showed Bernie as way more likely to beat Trump than her. Trump knew it, he even said it, Cambridge Anaylitica probably told him, and still the Hillary supporters deny it. As Gurdjieff wrote, “Even God has no defense against stupidity." Blessings to those of evolving conscience.
    1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. The Clinton campaign to keep the government in the criminal hands of the bankers has now spent over a million dollars to pay trolls to argue with Bernie supporters on line. I don't know what she thinks she is getting for her big bucks. I have been online since the first SLIP connections were available to private individuals, back then usegroups was about the only thing online with hundreds of .alt groups. In all the tens of thousands of online arguments in comments and forums, I have never seen one person change their mind on any matter involving politics. Not one. . . But how is it that we are apparently about to end up with an election in which the two most persons (and I use the term lightly) in America are running? Don't be surprised if Bill Clinton runs for vice-president, and if that happens, don't be surprised if Bill has her knocked-off. It's the Clinton way; use the vote of deceived African/American, who don't know enough history and current events to understand that no president since the Emancipation Proclomation has done more to hurt them and disenfrranchise and keep then poor than the "first American black president" Bill (send-our-factories-to-China Clinton. Really, who would be a worse candidate than an person who had her puggy greedy fingers in every illicit scam the government darlings have come up with since she campaigned for Barry (no-water) Goldwater, well maybe Trump, but he may be one of the few who could destroy what him and his billinare chums have left of the American Dream. And no matter what he says, he is gonna go after Social Security, because it is money that he and the other one tenth of one percenters should be getting. All you Joe Sixpacks and Larry the fantasy plumber agree with that. The poor people who have absolutely no say at all in the governance of our nation are the ones who have screwed the pooch and bankrupted the country -- right? So we should further deregulate Wall Street and increase defense and police spending, because who is going to protect the owners of America from the citizens of the vast fashist plutocracy we live in when the populace at large finally -- FINALLY realize that the one percent has been at war with the 99 percent in every way, police brutality, subversion of the regulations that protect the country from rapeacious banksters, and insane defense contractors, the continual contraction of freedoms and protection from the government, deregulation and privatization of the military and penal systems, who Huh? The middle class did not disappear entirely as of yet, but it is heading that way, more rapidly all the time. Meanwhile American score new highs in stupidity ratings as a stunned civilized world listen to the rantings of a spoiled brat, and wonder at the incredible stupiduity necessary to mistake a conman for a statesman.
    1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. Democracy Now is Consistently the most coherent and courageous voice in the legitimate news media. We are all waiting for the next 9/11 that these retrograde de-evolutionary anti American bastards who wrap themselves in the flag will pull. Let's use the power of Deep MInd to destroy them this time. As Robert Mercer is using the power of AI to destroy us, so that he and the Koch brothers don't have to pay taxes on their booty. These idiot savants are replacing a golden future of humanity that is near at hand, with their own insane and inane vision. Campaign Finance is the lynch pin. Mercer knows that and that is why he attacked you by decreasing your political value by backing such scams as Citizens United and the hydra of fake institutions that spread his poison. As long as they maintain the present system of legalized corruption of our elections through campaign contributions and actions that would be illegal had not these same interests changed the laws to make their criminal activities legal they cannot be beaten and will quickly revive if harmed. It's time to cut through all this, they can deflect us endlessly with the incredible wealth that they have actually stolen from each and every one of us, and brainwashed the dimmer among us to fight in their behalf. They are masters of the illusion of legitimate power, and do have some power, as long as they can pay gunmen, enough to overcome their qualms about shooting their own, or just hire psychopaths who see a police career as a way to exercise their desire to kill and destroy others without the natural consequences. All money must be taken out of politics. It is not normal to believe that someone who seeks a position of power is a good person. The worst persons seek power, the best have to be dragged to it. Why do so many think that leaders should be revered? Look at all those glowing faces in Trumps crowds, some of them weren't paid, aren't millionaire thieves who will personally benefit from his kleptocracy and the Putinesk distribution of national assets to various oligarchs and wealthy buddies, and are cheering against their own best interests. Yes a lot of them are stupid, and that is why we have Trump, stupid people along with everyone else were given a choice by Goldman Sach in the last election, and that choice was, "Would you rather live in piss or shit?", and they chose shit.
    1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. I am Bernie or Bust baby and this is why: Hillary = crooked Trump = conman Bernie = statesman No Bernie, I vote for Rosann Barr she is smarter than all of them anyway. Something is wrong with a system that is best described as a "hate fuck" as Bill Marher said. Our system managed to deliver the two most hated characters in the public eye. Something deeply wrong there. Don't believe for a second that these bastards are incompetent, they have intelligence and rescources that you cannot imagine, they are truly gods, compared to scum like us. That's why they have to go, because it's us or them. I disagree, I voted for the lesser of two evils before and it leaves a bad taste in your brain. You don't have to worry all that much about Trump, he is just a ploy to make Hillary palatable don't fall for it. Her and her husband are evil on the hoof. The Congressmen will kill Trump, one way or another. Also I agree with kicking out illegal aliens. Reagan allowed millions of illegal aliens to become citizens and we were promised that was the last time it would happen. Get rid of them, there are plenty of roofers and shit in PA and Alabama that will be happy to build stuff for the western states were white guys don't build, and let the migrants in to do farm work and that's it. A country more than anything else is composed of the genetic makeup of its inhabitants, that's why there are resource poor countries like Germany and Japan that are strong and civilized and places with huge resources that are horrible places to live. If you haven't noticed everyone in the whole world wants to move in with the Europeans and become citizens, problem is if sixty percent of France is Algerian or similar, you no longer have a France, you have a kind of mutated Algeria, same here, you would have to be nuts to want to live in Mexico, but if our population becomes Mexican, so does the country, and soon you just have another super corrupt country run by the mafia. Europeans are good at civilization, if they weren't everyone wouldn't be crashing the national boarders of northern and central Europe and North America. Hows that for a series of blinding flashes of the obvious. Hope it didn't fog up your pc goggles too much..
    1
  1400. 1
  1401. Even though Bernie is a non-practicing Jew, in my opinion he is the first real Christian to run since Jimmy Carter. Morally that is. Think about it. Reagan put on the Christian cloak and he was actually a murderous liar directly responsible for the murder and torture of thousands of innocent villagers in Central America, just to point out one of the reasons he would end up in hell if there was a hell. Bill Clinton claimed to be a man of the people and he was just a lying scoundrel who never really got out of the trailer park. George W objectively should be ranked tyrants who corrupted the gov by using the power of the military to ruthlessly murder hundreds of thousands of innocent noncombatants, destroy one of the stable non radical Islamic nations, and make the world a whole lot more like hell than it should ever be. He will probably be put in charge of the hot tubes in hell, because despite his apparent simple-mindedness he was one brutal source of evil and lies during his term, who fucked up America as much and maybe more than JP Morgan JR when he manipulated the American public into WW1 thereby setting the stage for the rise of Hitler, WW2, the communist revolution, and all kinds of evil just because he and his bankster buddies could not bear to lose the millions they had invested in English and French war effort. So we entered a war that the American public had to be brain washed into accepting. Luckily the Council on Foreign Relation happily did this for a fee, and employed the newly discovered techniques of unconscious motivation that Sigmund Freud's nephew Edward Bernais developed. This was the worst thing anyone ever did to America. The propaganda was so good that here we are a hundred years later and even most historians still don't know that WW1 was caused by the Brits, who had a tradition of just going to war with any business competitors. Gemany had just won a contract to build a railroad line from central Europe into the middle east oil fields that granted them the territory on both sides of the tracks. The Brits started the war in Africa with military actions against the German incursion into what they thought of as their oil fields. Now you know more true American history than 99.9999 percent of the people alive.
    1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. @Daniel If you would consider an auto-mechanic who was telling someone that a particular bolt had reverse threads and that by attempting to loosen it you were actually tightening it judgmental?  Then I am certainly judgmental.  But not in the same sense as when someone refers to someones else as a troll or something like that.  Actually that word used to mean something back when there were only newsgroups on line and the WWW consisted of only a couple dozen sites that resembled today's web. You have mistaken what I have been referring to with some idea about healing oneself from some apparent ill, or programming, or perhaps some organic aliment of one type or another.  It isn't.  What I am expressing has nothing to do with fixing oneself.  Not in any guise or by any measure. If you actually followed this thread you should know that I fully concurred when asked if I thought that psychotropic molecules could have a desirable therapeutic effect.  My only issue is that, if one's only experience of higher forms of consciousness is derived from drugs, you should not confuse yourself and others with the idea that drug experiences are similar to "spontaneous" awakening.  I am simply stating that if someone has experience with both, they  know that they are not at all similar except in how intensely distinct they are from the normal walking around state of sleep that people refer to as waking-consciousness.  If you had bothered to  comprehend my posts, they state this quite clearly, over and over. If you simply think I am lying, then you were correct in you initial assessment, you should not have responded.  What's the point.  I don't care how I "come off"  I am just stating which way the threads on a bolt run.  And I say this because this is an area were people can actually tell when they don't know something.  Unlike your, childish attempt at pop-psychology.  A world of misguided souls and such -- which is actually kind of self-fullfilling, because if you believe that, then it is true, for you.  You do realize that if I used the term "awaken spirituality" as you seem to quote, that it must have had  inverted quotes around the term to indicate that there is something inherently dubious about it.  When men refer to  "spirituality", they are actually referring to the profound complexity and capacity to produce ecstasy of their own endocrine and limbic systems.  It's as simple as this: if a person  knows someone who has developed a certain capacity, lets say playing a piano, and they are writing to him about fixing their piano so that it is not cacophonous when they  attempt to play it, but his piano works fine and he has no interest in "fixing" it.  Nothing he has written in the past had anything to do with fixing any piano, his own or his friends. Then because he did not realize that the other fella's piano is not out of tune or in need of some repair,   he calls him an egoist because the man has been talking about the actual experience of making music and the other guy has never been able to make music other than by turning his stereo on.  The guy with the broken piano should at least be able to realize that the fact that his polyphonic friend CAN sit down and play quite well, and had been able to do so for a good number of decades: he should be able to realize that the  guys ability to actually play supersedes any impression he may have that the other guys piano is in need of repair like his own.  Then the guy who thinks his piano is broken accuses the musician of claiming to be able to play with no hands, and says that someone who can actually play without using their hands, or using their body in any way would never say the words that he has said. . . . himself failing to remember that the guy with a working piano had previously told him that the whole idea of playing a broken piano with no hands was ridiculous.  He had obviously forgotten the time the guy with the good piano had taken to explain how people who could not play the piano for one reason or another often made up ridiculous rules by which they imagined that someone who could play would follow and that as it was understood by those with no understanding at all of the reality of this matter, his behavior was inappropriate for a no-handed player with a broken piano.   With this he could almost agree, since they were talking about two different things: except for one little matter: that being: that the guy with the broken piano's piano was not broken, but as long as be believed there was something that needs to be fixed he will enjoy nothing  but absolutely cacophonous sounds coming from his piano as he went at it with his little kit of concepts and explanations, his pop psychology hammer, and his wanna-be mystic saw. The guy who knew his piano was as intact and in tune as it ever needed to be in order to play, also knew that despite his resort to symbolism there was practically zero chance that the difference between playing and thinking about playing would be able to be realized by those who believed something was wrong with their pianos when there wasn't.  And they  would never be able to play as long as they believed they had to fix their piano first. For no particular reason I am adding the following for the children who believe that everyone else is hobbled as they are.  Being that being hobbled comprises the whole of their earthly experience this is certainly understandable. Most people who know anything about what is being referred to by my blabbing, realize whether they are themselves capable of it or not, that a person of any authentic experience in such matters, who has entered a realm of enhanced consciousness, knows full-well that  one of the characteristics of such a quantum leap of consciousness is an end to the perpetual flow of association, of one thought leading to another, even if one is not intentionally thinking about something.  Really there is no need to say much further about it.  If you have real experience of a quantum leap in consciousness, that is, not brought about by external drugs, but by the endopharmic action that results from breakthrough realizations, which are actually not two different things.  That is: if it is something that you can bring about by active consideration and insights it is always attended by the absence of the automatic flow of associative thoughts which most people refer to as "I" or consider their  "I" to be the source of "their thoughts".  If you have actually read my posts and gave it your best to understand them, you may remember that I stated that it is impossible to describe the grande experience of awakening directly, anything you say about it will be misleading at best, and this with people who are ready and dying to awaken, people who have striven to awaken without real success, perhaps for years or decades.  Which is not uncommon at all in traditional religious or so-called spiritual groups of one kind or another. Well the fact remains that even someone who is awake in a cosmic sense , still cannot tell another person anything much about it, the state itself that is.  And they definately cannot tell you how to awaken, or some information that will give you the understanding of how to awaken.  Because being able to do it yourself is imperative.  No one can do it for you, and words, though they can be entertaining, even delightful if someone with a real passion just happens to run into someone who can himself do what they seek. Though no one can tell you how to bring about these ultimate forms of supra conscious experience, they definitely can tell you things that can save you decades, if such is your goal. I am not talking about vague advice here, or something that really can't be done as  explained, and then the failure to achieve such a state falls upon the student, when actually such things could never be done as presented by any number of the various wanna-be mystics and cult leaders who  present themselves to the public as someone who can walk the walk, when in truth they can't eve really talk the talk in any manner that originated with their own insight or awakening, because even their talk is borrowed and not really their own. Bearing this in mind, I would just like to mention, that I could tell someone how to stop their thoughts.  Not for a second or two, but stop them: for as long as they desire or is appropriate in their situation, and then again, whenever they want for as long as they want, if they have fallen asleep again (not bed sleep you understand: waking sleep) that their active mentation devolves into a mechanical procession of associative images which amounts to waking sleep, or your continual need to be distracted from their tedium  of mechanical thought-centric consciousness by seeking entertainment or some sort of diverting stimulus.  Of course if they are sound enough asleep this waking-sleep of the mechanical flow of association will not bother them at all.  They can't even see it for what it is.  See it or be it. Instead of this state of distraction, I can tell you how to enter a state of bliss, with absolutely no thoughts at all.  And for all practical purposes it is effortless.  From within this silence, the storied grande experience of awakening or enlightenment is far more assessable to those with such an intent. There are the type of people who will be bothered by such a statement and automatically react with some childish expression of hostility, but there are also the type who think something along the lines of "If this guy's not full of shit, this is the luckiest day of my life." Which is not really true.  It could have been the luckiest day of their life, if. . . Then again, the net if anything, if full to the brim with second chances in the form of aliases.  So. . . as the blind man said, "We shall see."
    1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. Good Show. Figure out how to make Campaign Finance Reform sexy, and save the nation from the criminal scumbags that are now stealing our nation. If you have two brain cells to rub together you can figure out that the funding of politics is nothing but a system of corruption that was put in place to steal as much as possible for as long as possible. A populist movement cannot win as long as the worst among us: the Mercers, Kochs, and Goldman Sachs minions, control everything through a system of corruption that they themselves have devised. Sure it seems like there are a thousand issues: Trump giving away national assets like Putin did to a bunch of rich unevolved assholes who are proud of their predation upon the populace, and there endless red herrings that get all the single issue voters at one anothers' throats: climate change, fundamentalist morons who think that the world is six thousand years old and will end tomorrow, wars in support of private business interests, wholesale surveillance of the citizens, a ridiculous number of psychopaths with badges who believe they are licensed to kill, etc. etc. etc. But I am telling you that Robert Mercer understands that the lynch pin of control is campaign finance, that’s why he funds Citizens United, and Britbart, and put Trump in office by giving him key words found by Cambridge Anaylitica to repeat over and over, in near meaningless lies, that the mindless fools that watch and believe Fox New and similar founts of lies were responding to on a limbic level. He knows that campaign finance is the key to power – do you? Until this is done, the present plutocratic kleptocracy will swiftly recover from any temporary setbacks. Sorry if it boars you. It’s not up to your opinion, this is the game theory, this is the facts. Robert Mercer is using the power of AI against the population and government of the USA to make your voice and vote more meaningless than it already is. Campaign finance reform must be done, not because it is somebodies interest or pet interest, but because it is the only thing that CAN be done to stop this avalanche of shit the one percent is burying us under. Goldman Sachs gave the American public a choice in the last election and that choice was, “Would you rather live in shit or piss.” And thanks to 80,000 rust belt fools who were conned by a New York City conman, America chose shit. And until campaign finance is address and totally deprivatized you will only have a choice between shit and piss in all the coming elections. Unless a real populist like Bernie is nominated (don’t hold your breath) as he should have been, and reforms this madness. The shit we are in now is because of the neoliberal idiots who supported and cheated for Hillary and voted for her in the primary even though all the polls showed Bernie as way more likely to beat Trump than her. Trump knew it, he even said it, Cambridge Anaylitica probably told him, and still the Hillary supporters deny it. As Gurdjieff wrote, “Even God has no defense against stupidity.” Blessings to those of evolving conscience.
    1
  1431. 1
  1432. Here is the reason that ATT does not offer high speed internet in low income areas. ATT is part of the government low income internet access program. https://www.att.com/shop/internet/access/#/ Because of this they are obligated to provide the fastest service that they offer in a participants area for either $5 or $10 a month. The rules of being part of this low income program state that the data is unlimited without any price increase for big users and it's speed cannot be throttled to slow it down. They get around the obligations of this program to provide fast internet to the poor by not offering a fast service in low income areas. Here is an example of how they cheat both the government and their customers: My ATT phone line had provided 9MB/second speeds when I was paying a local ISP $60 a month. I switched to ATT access. When the tech came out for the installation he tested the line and said that it was capable of stable operation at 9MB/ second. Which is exactly what I was getting on a line that was leased from ATT by Sonic, who then resold it to Cruzio (a local ISP). When I switched to ATT (who own the line) my speed was slashed by two thirds to 3MB/second (better than dial-up but not by much) even though the line was capable of far faster speeds. ATT does not offer a faster service in my area (which has a lot of trailer courts in it). This is their way of getting around the law that says they are not allowed to throttle my speed or limit my total through-put. Once again I give you the real reason behind the press releases that you read to fill up time. If you were really investigative reporters instead of regurgitating press releases you would be investigating and exposing Robert Mercer's brutal political actions.
    1
  1433. 1
  1434. It is difficult to imagine the positive value that having Bernie in the executive office would be when all is said and done. BUT I think they may be parallel to the value that Ralph Nader would have delivered had he made a successful bid. I firmly believe that had Nader been president we would never have been in either of the wars, and that we would not have had a great recession.  The banking corporate elite would have been reigned in before they expressed their real quality and worth as human beings (by driving the nation into financial ruin, and then with the bailout money, paying themselves huge bonuses -- in full view of the public eye -- which gives you a true idea of what they think of the power {and attention spans} of average Americans.) I can only feel that Bernie will do even better.  His refusal to run third party proved to me that he was an even better candidate than Ralph. There is a little ray of sunlight, and it is shining right on the linchpin that hold us all in thrall to a hideous machine of death, and the unavoidable self-destruction that a continuation of business-as-usual, represents. Though as unsexy and boring as the corporate owned media can make it, despite a spate of meaningless red herrings, the public is becoming aware that campaign finance reform is the ONLY issue that can effectively address the root of all problems, because it is the root of how, though unelected and beyond public scrutiny, the one percent continue to own and rule us, and profit by our misfortunes, which are of their knowing design. They rule a kingdom of financial coercion and outright violence, which is quickly becoming a police state. Register Democrat and vote for Bernie. That is the only election there will be in 16. Whoever wins the Democratic Primary will have to beat Bush and I think either of them can do that. But I believe that Hillary has a lot of grist for the republican Swift-Boat mill, that Bernie doesn't.  They will only have the fear they can inspire in those who are afraid to try something that is not self-victimizing.  Which the Republican are pretty good at.  There is no question, IMHO, that Bernie can beat any of the Republicans, but can he beat Hillary? If she were any kind of person she would either step aside or offer to run for vice-president.  She's smart, she must know that this is what would be best for the country.  But with Hillary, it's all about Hillary, and with Bernie, . . . eh, . . . not so much. If he doesn't win, it can only be chalked up to the partiality, ignorance, and underhandedness of the Democrat insiders themselves. Can we really afford to hand the bully-pulpit over to Goldman Sax and accomplices yet again, for another eight years?  Can civilization endure another decade of having banking criminals in control" They will pillage with glee, and take as much as you will let them steal.  All they need to do is change a law here and there, what's the problem, most of the Congressmen work for them. Nobody will even read it till long after it passes. If Bernie can win that is just the smallest ingress into a whole world of corruption and power.  It will be very much up to the rest of us to sustain an effort to bring the-long-view to a government that moves from crisis to crisis, and in which, though everyone is talking, only money is heard.
    1
  1435. 1
  1436. Good Show. Figure out how to make Campaign Finance Reform sexy, and save the nation from the criminal scumbags that are now stealing our nation. If you have two brain cells to rub together you can figure out that the funding of politics is nothing but a system of corruption that was put in place to steal as much as possible for as long as possible. A populist movement cannot win as long as the worst among us: the Mercers, Kochs, and Goldman Sachs minions, control everything through a system of corruption that they themselves have devised. Sure it seems like there are a thousand issues: Trump giving away national assets like Putin did to a bunch of rich unevolved assholes who are proud of their predation upon the populace, and there endless red herrings that get all the single issue voters at one another's throats: climate change, fundamentalist morons who think that the world is six thousand years old and will end tomorrow, wars in support of private business interests, wholesale surveillance of the citizens, a ridiculous number of psychopaths with badges who believe they are licensed to kill, etc. etc. etc. But I am telling you that Robert Mercer understands that the lynch pin of control is campaign finance, that’s why he funds Citizens United, and Britbart, and put Trump in office by giving him key words found by Cambridge Anaylitics to repeat over and over, in near meaningless lies, that the mindless fools that watch and believe Fox New and similar founts of lies were responding to on a limbic level. He knows that campaign finance is the key to power – do you? Until this is done, the present plutocratic kleptocracy will swiftly recover from any temporary setbacks. Sorry if it boars you. It’s not up to your opinion, this is the game theory, this is the facts. Robert Mercer is using the power of AI against the population and government of the USA to make your voice and vote more meaningless than it already is. Campaign finance reform must be done, not because it is somebodies interest or pet interest, but because it is the only thing that CAN be done to stop this avalanche of shit the one percent is burying us under. Goldman Sachs gave the American public a choice in the last election and that choice was, “Would you rather live in shit or piss.” And thanks to 80,000 rust belt fools who were conned by a New York City conman, America chose shit. And until campaign finance is address and totally deprivatized you will only have a choice between shit and piss in all the coming elections. Unless a real populist like Bernie is nominated (don’t hold your breath) as he should have been, and reforms this madness. The shit we are in now is because of the neoliberal idiots who supported and cheated for Hillary and voted for her in the primary even though all the polls showed Bernie as way more likely to beat Trump than her. Trump knew it, he even said it, Cambridge Anaylitica probably told him, and still the Hillary supporters deny it. As Gurdjieff wrote, “Even God has no defense against stupidity. Blessings to those of evolving conscience.
    1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. We should all just listen to the best president of all time and do exactly what he says. Because it's obvious from how the people around him behave that he is the best and has a real handle on the reality of the situation. I mean any man with his name on buildings all over the world must be a great leader. Stop all the bitching and fact checking and line up and applaud him and watch everything he does and listen to every thing he says. He is so fascinating and not like all you dumb experts and intellectuals, he is entertaining like a slow motion train wreck. And like the pope he cannot be wrong. Actually he is every bit a real life super-hero. He is a very stable genius and all the tuff people support him. And they have guns and the democrats mostly don't. Yeh Trump, best president ever, and the savior of the USA. And stop laughing at his hair and fake tan, he is supposed to look his best he is the spokes-model for the USA. Trump totally represents us and theAmericans who voted him in are really smart and the envy of the world. Plus he has the best ratings. So: all you smart asses out there just remember whatever you do, do not laugh in this god-like mans face, no matter what he says. You just do not have the superior IQ like him, and don't understand how deeply profound his statements are, and that they are both earnest and sarcastic at the same time. He is a quantum president and his statements only mean what he says in retrospect like Schrodinger's cat statements. He is magic, almost like Jesus or Hitler, and if you openly laugh at him, he will punish us by going away. So don't laugh in his face when you are with him in person, not that anyone near him has the balls or ovaries to do it anyway. A point he proves everyday, you delightful scallywags and misanthropic sycophants. Good job, how did we ever deserved the wonderful leaders we have. Without you guys we would really be hard pressed to find a war worth fighting and that would hurt the economy.
    1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. Pushing those who suffer chronic pain from a doctors care to the underground heroin market is not an unintended consequence of short-sighted legislation. The people who brought and pushed through the reforms to pain med availability were fully aware what the consequences would be.  A primer in clear thinking follows: Who controls the government? Those who provide the candidates for office with the money necessary to be elected. Who provides this money?  Mostly the financial and banking industries and a few very rich families that make massive political contributions in order to buy the legislation they want.If you haven't noticed it doesn't matter one bit whether a democrat of republican wins any particular election in the US. In either case the same people are still calling the shots. And they basically operate out of the reptilian brain. Who would profit from pushing those dependent on opioids into buying illegal drugs? These same banking interests. Why is that so? Who do you think launders (20 -50% ) and invests the billions of dollars made by the major criminal organizations? When these changes were open to discussion before they were put through, expert after expert testified that exactly what has happened would happen: suicide, and an illegal drug epidemic. It may seem harsh, but personally I do not care one bit about the individuals people who die from drug use. I think it is stupid to continually revive and care for those who OD. Let them die, it's an easy way to go, in many cases death by opioids is like an angel of mercy from their horrendous lives and act as a sort of Darwinian disposal method for society as a whole. Of course if these drugs were decriminalized and the people were actually cared about by our society they could easily live a normal life while using. In fact the example of Portugal (and other countries that take reality into consideration) have proven that their policies actually causes a decrease in drug use. Even the use of marijuana has decreased among teenagers in the Netherlands since it was legalized, and eventually the same will happen in the states in the USA that have same laws concerning it. It just won't be cool because it isn't edgy any longer and doesn't represent a revolutionary or risky act.
    1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. BYD beat Tesla sales, for one quarter. For the year Tesla was ahead. Tesla profit margin was 11% last year. BYD was about half that. So if you only count the final quater BYD did "catch up". Now when you look at the tech and quality of the cars themselves it is a different story. BYD has a long way to go, and when they get there, Tesla will be further ahead than now. Do not believe anything you see about Tesla on commercial news. Tesla does not pay for commercials. The "news" especially the financial "news" is not there to inform you. It is there to sell ad space/time so it runs anything that attracts clicks/views. They are continually attempting to shake down Tesla for ad dollars, which can be in the multiple billions per year (GM 2.2 billion 2020) and they don't mind lying to attempt to get Tesla to anti up. They do it on a daily bases, usually many times per day. The majority of negative comments on social media are fromm union shills, short sellers (55 billion lost shorting Tesla so far) dinocar OEMs who can't compete and blame a lack of public interest, those invested in dealerships, gas and oil, service centers, parts OEM (all tiers) your local mechanic, and a hoard of ludites: who can't understand the difference between over 90% efficiency in a system and 40%, have never driven an EV, like dragging a useless ton of iron around with them in the pickup they never actually use as a pickup, and when they do, it could have been done using the trunk of a sedan, and like the fact that the sound of their damaged muffler or low brain cell exhaust mod makes them sound like a big lion, because it is the only segment of their life where they have even the illusion of being powerful.
    1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. @Edward Fleming They would be cut out by legitimate concerns that went into business. And legalization would take 95% of the profit out of the whole deal. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. I would just like to say thanks for all the info that as a hobby investor I would probably not see if it weren't for your timely reports. You turned me onto both the stock that will become polestar, and the one that allows me to easily invest in CATL. Something I would not have had the patients to figure out myself. While my main investment is Tesla which represents slightly more then half of my portfolio, I do now hold about one and a half percent of my total in the polestar and CATL instruments. I think it is early in the game for both of them. One of my best buys has been in a rare earth and strategic metals etf, which shall go unnamed because every time I mention certain instruments, YouTube automatically deletes my comment. Nvidia has also done well for me, but I was in long ago. It is sort of in competition with Tesla in the AI, and FSD, realms and the stock values seem to roughly mirror each other. I also have some BYD and I probably should buy some more of that. I have more or less invested in a stack of ev related instruments, AI, and now robots I guess. Like yourself I am fascinated by all aspects of this industry, and I really don't know why. I usually have little interest in engineering and factories and such. I guess it's the "vision thing". If this thing ever really happens like Elon envisions, it will be an evolutionary quantum leap for human life. The old saying was, "What's good for GM is good for the USA" and at the time that was pretty, though not totally true. Now it's, What's good for Tesla is good for humanity. And that is pretty much true. I cannot wait to see what Tesla does with the incredible earnings it is destined to garner.
    1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612.  @jackholloway1  We can keep going with this is you want to, but your are only going to find out that your assumptions are based on media spin and not the facts. For instance: about 300 years ago, on August 1, 1714, England's Queen Anne died. As a result, the German Elector George Louis of Hanover was proclaimed king of Great Britain in absentia. He was the only possible heir to the throne, and the first German to ascend an English throne. The German king did not set foot on English soil until two months after his proclamation and was crowned King George I on October 20, 1714. His grandson George III was the first in the line of German kings to be born in England, with English being his first language. He married the German Princess Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. The couple had 15 children. In 1837, George IV's niece Victoria, who also had a partly German bloodline, was crowned. She married her cousin, the German Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Queen Victoria died in 1901, succeeded by her eldest son Edward VII, the first English king from the German dynasty of Sachsen-Coburg and Gotha. To make the name easier to pronounce for the English, the house was renamed Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Just a few years later, in 1910, his son George V became king. He was married to Maria von Teck, who also had German blood, and who became known as Queen Mary. In 1917, George V decided to change the German family name to Windsor. George also renounced all German titles, as did his cousin Ludwig von Battenberg, who renamed his family Mountbatten. Queen Elizabeth's husband, Prince Philip, came from this family. The mother of Queen Elizabeth II was British, so she was only partly of German descent. Her husband Philip, however, had predominantly German ancestors and spoke fluent German. In 1947, he became a British citizen and, shortly before his marriage to Elizabeth, relinquished his German title of nobility and called himself only "Mountbatten." Their eldest son, the new King Charles III, has a bloodline made up of roughly half German ancestors. So it is no wonder that genetic tests cannot distinguish between Germans and English: Even the King is half German, and many of the British royals before him were entirely German.
    1
  1613. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. Kind of silly since the number one EV manufacturer by far in both China and Europe is Tesla, and they produce cars in both China and Germany. The uninformed and intentionally misinforming media pretends like there is some kind of race going on, while the fact is that there is only a race for "also ran". Tesla is so far ahead of any other EV manufacturer that any meaningful comparison can only be made between Tesla and cars that cost twice as much as a Tesla and Tesla is still the better product. The news media seems to think that other companies are "catching up" to Tesla, but the truth is that minute by minute Tesla is pulling further ahead, and reducing prices at the same time. German auto, with the exception of German Tesla has dug its own grave, Chinese EV with the slight exception of BYD, like the American (with the exception of American Tesla, have yet to produce an EV without losing tens of thousands of dollars on each unit, and BYD who is really only a contender in China, is claimed by the media to be the biggest EV producer in China, while the fact is that this is only true is you count hybrid gas vehicle, Tesla produces the most, best, and only meaningfully profitable EVs in China, Europe, and America, and the reason has nothing to do with the reports by the media, which lives or dies on ad revenues, and Tesla does not advertise. The reason they are number one in spite of the disinformation given out everyday by the media, is because when all things are considered Tesla offers value far exceeding that of all other EV manufacturers and a place to actually charge them without anxiety.
    1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. Bernie $ VS Bloomburg $ Apologies to those who took arithmetic in elementary school. I know you already know this -- even so you may not be able to envision the difference in these fortunes and this explanation may help. Bernie has a stack of two million one dollar bills that he wants to give to Judy. Bernie is old and can only give her one dollar each second. If Bernie is wearing a catheter and doesn't need to go to the bathroom and can hand Judy dollar bills 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: how long will it take Bernie to give Judy his two million dollars? answer: There are 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hours and 24 hours in a day: Therefore Bernie can hand Judy 86,400 dollar bills every day. So he can give her $86,000 per day. So it would take Bernie just about 23 days and three and a half hours to give Judy two million dollars. (since $86,400 goes into $2,000,000 a little over 23.15 times) In twenty three days Bernie could hand Judy his two million dollars, one dollar at a time, if he can stay awake, and he can, cause he is a vastly woke dude. How long would it take little Mike to hand Judy his 60,2 billion dollars one dollar at a time? Mike is also old and wearing a catheter, is being fed intravenously and attended by his personal medical staff. Through the wonders of modern pharmacology and a neural implant he purchased, Mike can also stay awake. But due to age Mike can also only hand Judy one dollar bill per second. So Mike, like Bernie can give Judy $86,400 per day. There are 6,759.26 ($86,400) in 60.2 billion dollars so it would take Mike six hundred and ninety six thousand seven hundred and fifty nine days to hand Judy his 60.2 billion dollars. That's 696,759.26 days. That many days equals one thousand nine hundred and eight years and a few days short of eight months. So it would take Mike 1908.93 years to hand Judy all his money (that we know of). Bernie would be broke in 23 days. Mike would be broke in 1,909 years. Who is the oligarch? Addendum: Please note that since Mike is a capitalist who profits, not from his labor or producing goods but by investment, his wealth will actually be increasing by more than $86,400 per day because of profits on his fortune. So in reality, no matter how many thousands of years he spends handing Judy his money, he would never be able to do it and would always have more to hand her each day than he did the day before. Addendum PS: Old Jewish wisdom: "Every time somebody makes something for nothing, somebody else makes nothing for something." In Bloomburg's and the other billionares cases this "somebody else" is you and everyone else. If you don't understand this you are truly blind and will never understand why wealth is concentrating in fewer and fewer hands and you are being robbed in ways you neither understand nor can do anything about without a fundamental paradigm shift in our laws, government, and cultural world-view.
    1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. Seeing comments like this is beginning to make me lose respect for Peter's audience. No dude, the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. The CIA, about a thousand US special forces troops, and the Northern Alliance (an alliance of drug dealers and heroin smugglers) ran Al-Qaeda out of Afghanistan with minimal ground forces and a few cargo planes full of hundred dollar bills. The mess you are seeing now is entirely the fault of the people who decided to send in the army and nation build. This is the decision that caused the following twenty years of wasted funds and American lives. So who was it that made that fateful and enormously stupid decision? Yes hindsight is 20/20 but apparently so were the many voices that warned of the inevitable quagmire that would develop in Afghanistan twenty years ago. This is who is really responsible for the lose of life and the incredible expense of a meaningless war that anyone with a few brain cells knew, would end as it has: decades ago. The dummy who made the decision: President George W. Bush signs into law a joint resolution, authorizing the use of force against those responsible for attacking the United States on 9/11. This joint resolution will later be cited by the Bush administration as legal rationale for its decision to take sweeping measures to combat terrorism, from invading Afghanistan, to eavesdropping on U.S. citizens without a court order, to stetting up the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But of course the usual suspects, the military industrial complex, dose see a huge windfall every time the USA arms it's enemies by giving arms and training to forces who have no intention of standing and fighting. The USA got punked once again by it's own arms industry.
    1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. If black people get reparations then northern Europeans should get reparations from the Italians for making slaves for Rome out of them, and all Europeans should get reparations from Turkey for taking slaves from all the coastal cities for over two hundred years under the Ottomans, because they have as much to do with the slavery back then as modern Americans do the small number of large slave owners in the South. And how about reparations from the black African raiders who delivered the other Africans to the slave trader ships on the coast or the Arabs who took most of the black slaves? How about the native South Americans made slaves by the Spanish and Portuguese Empires and worked to death in silver mines and rubber plantations, ditto for the Cubans and other Caribbean peoples. How about the natives of the Congo enslaved by Belgium and brutalized beyond comprehension? How about the millions of Chinese enslaved by their own people and worked to death building the Great Wall? How about the Germans and Russians and others worked to death in the Soviet Gulag? The Jews and Poles used as slave labor by the Nazis? The Native Americans taken as slaves by other Native American tribes? It goes on and on, there are hundreds if not thousands of examples of all the different peoples of the earth being slaves at one time or another. The fact is that almost everyone has slavery in their ancestry. Real history is full of slavery but I only ever hear one small sub-group who continue to cry about it and try to monetize the fact that their ancestors were slaves over a century ago.
    1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. It was not American isolationism that lead to it's involvement in WW1. Much the contrary. Entering WW1 was the stupidest thing that the USA ever did. When Russia collapsed and the revolutionaries signed a treaty with the Central Powers it freed up a million German soldiers to move to the western front. And admit it or not the soviets were now backing Germany. When this happened if the USA had not entered the war due to the subconscious manipulation of the American public via Edward Bernays Council on Foreign Relations using techniques he based on the unpublished works of his uncle Sigmund Freud, a public that was almost totally against the war became a public that cried for vengeance, even hung a few German Americans in the streets. If the USA had not entered the war at that point the Central Powers would have won. Had we stayed out of it, there would have been no Hitler, no WW2, no vast genocides of Jews, the disabled, gypsies, and various other scapegoat groups, no Soviet superpower, and no loss of over a hundred thousand American boys in a war the nation really had no stake in. AND the end game would have been more or less what we have in Europe today. (Remember the Germany of the time was not a Nazi Nation run by a madman but a constitutional monarchy in which political parties were limited to the legislative arena. And there is much speculation that the real reason for the insane mobilization that took place was the work on the construction of a German railroad from Central Europe into the oil fields of the Middle East, which the British controlled. On the other hand there are those Americans who benefited greatly from the war at the time. By the end of 1918, American factories had produced 3.5 million rifles, 20 million artillery rounds, 633 million pounds of smokeless gunpowder, 376 million pounds of high explosives, 21,000 airplane engines, and large amounts of poison gas.
    1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794.  @sarahprosecco  So true. Always need to wrap the base instincts of humans , in flags, or god's will, or patriotism, or justice, or some such rot to cover up the real rot: the fact that humans in denial of the true sense of their own capacity for brutality and ego enhancing aggression can rationalize anything in order to forever avoid the real intra-personal and cosmic reality of their heinous acts. Delusional killer apes with language, and brains molded by survival hormones distorted by the delusion that concepts have the same reality as things that don't disappear when no one is thinking or talking about them. Ever in denial of the fact that their beliefs and conceptual constructs are nothing but superficial devices to cover up the reality that aside from these instinctive hormonally driven distortions of the impulse for genetic expansion of life: inwardly they actually consist of nothing and must ever avoid this point blank realization. Unless they are fortunate enough to see that their mind and automatic mental functioning are totally mechanical and their immediate nonconceptual, consciousness awareness transcends all they presently believe to be themselves and hold dear. I have some hope for a generalized projection of oxytocin from females, and not much else outside of those few persons devoted to the evolution of their own consciousness within their lifetimes. The pursuit of which necessarily entails the abandonment of all forms of hostility, and even all forms of criticism such as I evidenced in the above tirade. Outside of references to actual physical events and problems, their is no truth in words let alone habitual mechanical thoughts, including these.
    1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. I could understand if FSD were the only issue but that is far from the case. People seem to think that an EV is an EV, nothing could be further from the truth. On the YouTube channel What Car? They tested several EVs in a video titled How far can electric cars REALLY go?? – we drive 12 until they DIE! Tesla, BYD & more. I would put the link but sometime that causes my comments to be deleted by the YouTube AI overlords. So if you are interested in what distinguishes Teslas from other EVs you can watch Monroe Live and see the engineers astonished by Tesla's tech time after time, but that is really only appealing to people who like tech. Or you can watch something like the vid I recommend which explains why Tesla is superior to a Merc EV that actually has a few miles better range at a 20k higher price. No other company can match Tesla technology, though the smart ones (like Toyota and some in China) are attempting to copy it. That is not to even mention the fact that some people pay nothing to charge their EVs and even power their homes because of powerwall arbitrage agreements with power companies. I have seen people astonished when their monthly electric bill was less than two dollars after being nothing or even negative because of this program. You can always buy five year old tech from a German company for more than a Tesla. The same companies that have cheated for years all the people on earth with their computer scams on exhaust emissions. Volvo make fine cars but like many "European" OEM their evs are made in China, not necessarily a bad thing, if you want to support the CCP. Thought they are still a decade behind Tesla and will never catch up because Tesla is pulling further ahead by the week.
    1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  1842. At 16:40 Bill says. . . In America: "They don't cut down the tall trees." Obviously lives in a different America than Christopher Columbus, George Washington, and Elon Musk's public personas do. While it is obvious to me at least, that if even one of Musk's far-out projects reaches fruition: Self-driving electric cars, space exploitation and exploration at an exciting pace, a computer/human interface, affordable AI directed humanoid robots, affordable internet access from remote locations, his threatened age of abundance, he will have achieved an Odin-like historical stature, beyond the likes of Henry Ford, Edison, and perhaps even Einstein. I personally can attest to the salubrious effect of an age of abundance to one's outlook, having spent part of my life in the so-called Age of Affluence, back in the sixties and seventies. In retrospect I am told, by the media experts it was not really an age of affluence but one of high inflation and many cultural challenges. A laughable group at best (those media darlings). Affluence is mostly a state of mind, or to be more honest, a state of hormones which inculcates a reciprocal state of mind. Status, and power are two tried and true ways to enhance this hormonal state even into advanced age. But it's not the only way. Basically that's what the sixties was all about: breaking the bonds of group imposed templates that regulated neuropeptide/endorphin enrichment of the subjective state. All the tropes of the "Age of Aquarius" are related to freeing the individual from these biochemical shackles posing as cultural norms: psychedelic drugs, spirituality and personal growth, humanistic psychological movements, experimental sexuality, and on and on. Of course for better or worse, these organically derived cultural norms had been both themselves mutating and directing this internal metabolic rewards system in humans since before the first non-instinctual behavior in our species, and like most things human, have their origins in the so-called "survival instinct".
    1
  1843. 1
  1844. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narrative that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues including this one (though not quite as bad as most). You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and performance in virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. If you are too far ahead of the herd it's the same as being too far behind the herd. You wanna be with the herd but at the front of it. You can be totally correct about how things will go, but as reality attests, perception is everything in a land where all value is relative. Fortunately Tesla has too much reality going for it to be held to the predilections of manipulated troglodytes who go by the financial media narratives. I know there are the institutions and whales, but there are so many people who bought TSLA because they bought a Tesla, lots. Also lots of people who can now afford all the Teslas they want, because the bought TSLA. The average American is in the dark, they just do not realize the demand for Teslas. These cars are so far beyond all other EVs that they really cannot be considered the same generation of EV. It's like you can have an F22 Raptor or you can have an F14 Tomcat, but the price you pay will not necessarily reflect the quality of your ride. In fact in many cases, though seriously inferior the F14 costs more. Unknown to them, the buying public does not realize the discontinuity between a Tesla and other EVs. They are barely the same thing. The fact that second hand Teslas are commonly sold for more than a new Tesla costs should tell you everything. But the reality of most of the public is a mosaic of attachments to varying degrees of a fantasy sold to them by ads and the companies that are in business only to sell ad time or space. That includes all of the financial networks. They hate Tesla, because it does not pay the hundreds of millions vig that the old OEMs cough up, to present their dreams to you, wrapped in emotionally alluring psychologically manipulative images, which effect you even if you know about the techniques used. Tesla does not advertise, they do not need to. Tesla owners sell Teslas to their friends by letting them drive them. The media would have loved to see Tesla fail, dry up on the vine, and they did everything they could to insure it, with false reports, thousands of word and minutes spent on one fire that occurred because of misuse and apparently drunkenness, but not one word about the thousands of people who die each year because they are burned up in a gas car. And on and on. But it didn't work, because ultimately Tesla is too real. Listen those of you who still swallow the media contrived swill they serve up to you as car fan mags and shows. The number ones selling car model in Germany is a Tesla model 3. Not the number one EV. The number one car of any type. That's issue one. It should tell even the holdouts something. number two. YOu can sell your Tesla for more than you payed for it. Because so many people want them that it can take months to get one. Tesla keep raising the price but it doesn't matter, they are still all sold out for months. Number three they have the most owner satisfaction of any car. The can run a million miles without anything but tire changes and some have. In the future you may not be able to buy a Tesla because it will be better for Tesla to just rent them by the mile as robotaxis. But people don't understand yet that if FSD is achieved it will be as big a breakthrough as was the steam engine. If the bot comes about, it will be a state change unparalleled in all of Human history. Overvalued -- . . . Really?
    1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. ​ @malikahmad8170  I was thinking that much of the land that the Jews purchased in Palestine was through Turkish absentee landlords at an extreme discount after the British took control and the Ottomans had lost in WW1, and was going to say as much, but I decided to look it up first and found out that I wasn't really wrong in this belief, but that it was a really complex issue, and Jewish organizations businesses and even private citizens were largely prevented from buying land, or at the best, highly restricted. This of course led to all sorts of shenanigans with strawman buyers, and many other means by which Jewish owners got around such restrictions. The whole think was a mess for many reasons. And the British, who were administering the region, was feeling pressure from certain powerful Jews, like Lord Rothschild who legitimized the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine in the Bafour declaration. Then the Zionists radicals blew up the British administrative offices in Palestine, and the British had more or less had it with the whole deal and pulled out. So it really seems that it was the British who allowed the establishment of Israel "legally". However it was also the British who enforced the restrictions on Jewish land purchases in Palestine. So there was really no country there just an administered territory. They were supposed to be organizing the country of Palestine, but when the British pulled out, The Jews in Palestine declared Israel an independent nation {which is distinct from a "homeland"} and civil war ensued. So -- the British did it. Sort of. But if there had been no British administration of the territory after the Ottoman rule disappeared: Jewish interests and parties would have just bought up everything anyway. The main problem is, once again -- religion.
    1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. Everybody (even politicians) knows what's wrong with the political system and have for over fifty years and nothing has been done to change things. The lynch pin of all that is wrong with the USA is campaign finance. All private money must be out of politics entirely. No funds of any kind from the private sector to politicians ever without jail time. What is now "business as usual" was not so long ago criminal activity. All campaign contributions are bribes, all PACs are anti-American. America is now owned by a few families, that is why you have such problems. All billionaires are inherently evil because no one makes and keeps that much money without being a scumbag. Think about it this way. If I gave you a dollar every second for twenty four hours a day it would take about two weeks for me to give you a million dollars. It would take about thirty two years to give you a billion dollars at the same rate. It would take 31,700 years to give you a trillion dollars. When our republic was founded severe restrictions were put upon the establishment of corporations. They had to be for the benefit of the pubic and they were only licensed to operate for thirty years at a time. We are now seeing the reason for this. The founding fathers knew that if wealth concentrated like it had in the hands of the royals and bankers of Europe it would be the end of the power of the people in our democratic constitutional republic. By the way the only real democracy on earth is Switzerland, a place with lots of firearms in civilian hands and no mass shootings. A place where heroin addicts are give drugs in a clinical setting which has no drug lords or junkies ripping off everything that isn't nailed down to support their habits. But we decided to do the same things that don't work over and over. We are idiots.
    1
  1887.  @tonysu8860  No Su, you are very wrong: We are not talking roding from space here with masses of depleted uranium or tungsten , or a rail-gun firing a depleated unranium projectile at a specific target, which would still only amount to localized damage, we are talking about a quite fragile missile that is totally dependent on its warhead for destructive potency. The Russians have been using hypersonic missiles in Ukranie with exactly the effect that Zeihan has reported. So you imagination is incorrect, and Zeihans analysis based on actual observation is most correct. Your idea that the kinetic force alone would penetrate defenses that might even resist nuclear explosion is pure nonsense, and fails to consider the most important factors involved in kinetic energy, speed alone is not enough without the necessary mass. All ICBMs are hypersonic, yet rely on nuclear weapons for destructive power, because if it was just the hypersonic missile alone it would, with luck destroy a building or two, instead of an entire city. Read and learn the truth instead of the fantasies you now believe. US Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley said the Russian use of hypersonic weapons in Ukraine was not having “really significant or game-changing effects” during a House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing. “Other than the speed of the weapon, in terms of its effect on a given target, we are not seeing really significant or game-changing effects to date with the delivery of the small number of hypersonics that the Russians have used,” Milley said. A senior US defense official said on Tuesday that Russia had launched between 10 and 12 hypersonic missiles against Ukraine so far. Here is a video of a shopping mall that was hit by a russian hypersonic missile. As you can see it is mostly still standing though the explosion from the warhead did set it on fire. No quantum leap in damage over a regular HE guided missile - despite the russian propaganda and hype. https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/video/2022/05/11/russian-missile-strikes-obliterates-ukrainian-shopping-mall/
    1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. I have been as critical as anyone is of Joe, but only on his own show. I love Joe, and his self-contradictory struggle to maintain at least the appearance of the open minded searcher of sorts. The media needs more people like JOe. Sure he eats meat and likes to see people beat the shit out of each other, but his YOutube channel is were I first came across Rhonda Patrick, David Sinclair, Bernie, Krouse, every thing from cutting edge physicist to numb skulls like that right wing Milo idiot. I check out the show and if it's a comedian or a fighter which is more than half the time I just listen to something else. Joe is just susceptible to the testosterone agenda and looks up to warriors like a kid. He is ever so slowly becoming aware of the impression of hypocrisy and unowned cognitive dissonance that he skirts on so many subjects. But so what if he give a stage to squirrely mofos that make their living by telling stories that some shalow PC kneejerks don't like. His guests are sometimes great, sometimes horribly offensive to people's intelligence, and mostly like irrelevant unless you think that comedians and fighters hold valuable opinions. Joe is mostly a stoner hanging with a big variety of people, within the bell curve anyway (I mean he really never has any guests that are actually outside of the consensus spread of relevancy. People are just assholes, they accept some story that fits their feelings and hormones and can't see beyond the self--involved little critters they are.
    1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. Though all authentic religions have their origin in an instance of expanded conscious awareness, no religion is about this experience even if it claims to be. In fact if it were not for those who attempted in one way or another to achieve such an enlightenment and failed, no body would have heard about the possibility at all. All communications about it are incorrect and cannot be otherwise. Regarding achieving such an exalted state, if you can think it: it cannot be correct. All your "spiritual" or metaphysical, heroes were failures: those that existed as more than metaphors that is. The possibility to ignite the dormant potential of awakening this totally physical epigenetic mode of enhanced awareness is not and can never be a subject. It is not something that can be approached or achieved by the thought-centric-associative-process that modern humans refer to as "me", or "i" and which is truly a totally automatic process that is the growing tip of the survival instinct. The reality of this is so far from what the "experts" or anyone has to say about it, that if one were actually seriously pursuing such an experience they would do best to just totally ignore what anyone including themselves and myself had to say about it. They would realize that the relationship that such conferences as this had to do with it, is about the same relationship as that which Fox news has to real events. It is entertainment and nothing more, for those who are satisfied with thoughts and dreams that originate with those who are indulging in hearsay, or at best, having had a taste of such a state, are so baffled by it that they can only resort to religious, or memes about "consiousness" when they are no longer in it. Enlightenment is not a concept. Nothing real or accurate can be said about it. It cannot be studied a little at a time like math or religion. Nothing leads to it and no one can lead you there. It is not an intellectual conclusion, idea, or belief. It is as physical as a heart attack, and nearly as devastating, if you find extreme astonishment devastating. It has nothing to do, not even tangentially, with anything that you or anyone else has ever thought about it.
    1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. Bernie $ VS Bloomburg $ Apologies to those who took arithmetic in elementary school. I know you already know this -- even so you may not be able to envision the difference in these fortunes and this explanation may help. Bernie has a stack of two million one dollar bills that he wants to give to Judy. Bernie is old and can only give her one dollar each second. If Bernie is wearing a catheter and doesn't need to go to the bathroom and can hand Judy dollar bills 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: how long will it take Bernie to give Judy his two million dollars? answer: There are 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hours and 24 hours in a day: Therefore Bernie can hand Judy 86,400 dollar bills every day. So he can give her $86,000 per day. So it would take Bernie just about 23 days and three and a half hours to give Judy two million dollars. (since $86,400 goes into $2,000,000 a little over 23.15 times) In twenty three days Bernie could hand Judy his two million dollars, one dollar at a time, if he can stay awake, and he can, cause he is a vastly woke dude. How long would it take little Mike to hand Judy his 60,2 billion dollars one dollar at a time? Mike is also old and wearing a catheter, is being fed intravenously and attended by his personal medical staff. Through the wonders of modern pharmacology and a neural implant he purchased, Mike can also stay awake. But due to age Mike can also only hand Judy one dollar bill per second. So Mike, like Bernie can give Judy $86,400 per day. There are 6,759.26 ($86,400) in 60.2 billion dollars so it would take Mike six hundred and ninety six thousand seven hundred and fifty nine days to hand Judy his 60.2 billion dollars. That's 696,759.26 days. That many days equals one thousand nine hundred and eight years and a few days short of eight months. So it would take Mike 1908.93 years to hand Judy all his money (that we know of). Bernie would be broke in 23 days. Mike would be broke in 1,909 years. Who is the oligarch? Addendum: Please note that since Mike is a capitalist who profits, not from his labor or producing goods but by investment, his wealth will actually be increasing by more than $86,400 per day because of profits on his fortune. So in reality, no matter how many thousands of years he spends handing Judy his money, he would never be able to do it and would always have more to hand her each day than he did the day before. Addendum PS: Old Jewish wisdom: "Every time somebody makes something for nothing, somebody else makes nothing for something." In Bloomburg's and the other billionares cases this "somebody else" is you and everyone else. If you don't understand this you are truly blind and will never understand why wealth is concentrating in fewer and fewer hands and you are being robbed in ways you neither understand nor can do anything about without a fundamental paradigm shift in our laws, government, and cultural world-view.
    1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. Never did trust that Mickey Mouse looking conman. Want to keep things as stupid as they are, don't include Tesla. Tesla is only the number one selling EV. Tesla is only the most American car in production, that is sold in America. Tesla only makes an EV that is a half dozen years ahead of the closest competitor. Tesla is only the company with the only viable charging network. Tesla is only the most ethical company in the entire auto world. Tesla only has, not only the number one selling EV but what will be without a doubt the number one selling car in the world. Tesla is only the actual reason that any other auto company is now going electric. Tesla is so far beyond this ignoramus's concept of what the future will look like, that he doesn't deserve to be in the same reality, let alone sit at the table with Tesla. Tesla is only the car company with the highest degree of owner satisfaction. Tesla only offers a car that is faster than any other production auto no matter the price, and can still can carry four adults and their golf clubs and full overnight gear while doing it. The media and the companies that would have rather had you die in a wreck because it was cheaper, until Nader forced them to adopt seat belts and collapsing steering columns, have been looking for a way to overcome Tesla, because it is so obviously superior in product and production than the dinosaur auto companies -- and it doesn't pay the crime family-like crooked media the advertising vig that the other car companies depend on to sell you dreams. Dreams that will not even approach the reality that is living right now in Tesla products and production methods. Buttegieg, with McCluen like rear-view mirror vision, leads us onward into the fog. And it's not even his rear-view mirror that he is looking through. It's the one lent to him by the dino-auto industry. The one that says "LIMITED VISION: objects are more crudely engineered than they appear in the ads". No unions at Tesla, Musk wants the employees to own Tesla. That's how it should be done. You micky-mouse-looking clown.
    1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. Comment part 1 Sheltered as I am, and as much a fool as I allow myself to be on a daily basis: I will now proceed my pouring from the empty into the void by giving a brief outline of how an optimal human government should be arranged. In fact, one objective look at the so-called political systems, and their underpinning, that populate our planet should inform the observer that what is happening is just window dressing on barbarism, it's just a theater of the mind, a velvet glove on an iron fist. I don't know of any system of government or rule that rises above the idiotic, or so it would seem, if the object of the system is to optimize, as much as is possible, all honorable aspects of human existence, and to curtail those commonly deemed as undesirable, the present systems of governance found on earth are archaic trash: just an excuse for the same old kleptocratic autocompulsive psychopaths, to further inflate their already vein-glorious mini-minds in the vacuous reflections of the sycophants that surround and enable their insanity because of their own highly deviated and corrupted survival impulse. They wish they were a real boy, but despite the world of suffering they create by trying to fill their truly vacuous lives with babbles of all types, real life eludes them, and always will. Even ole' Socrates knew that a person that seeks power should never be trusted with it. Human political culture is a joke. An eighth grade class could come up with a better system than the battered whore the banksters and one percent -- have afforded the world. It's a joke, a sin, and a wasted opportunity to evolve our culture into one that would nurture the greatness that humanity could be. But we ain't great, and we never have been, though for sure, an individual here and there, now and then has been -- great that is. Though to tell you the truth Alexander wasn't, and neither was his teacher Aristotle. Two utter failures that the world has adored for over two millennia. So wad ya gonna due -- aye? Real democracy is something usually only found in a direct democracy. Representational Democracy, Republics, Constitutional Republic, etc, are a device used to lead the capite censi to believe that they live in a participatory democracy while allowing the plutocrats to stay in control of the things that matter to them. A few prefectures in Switzerland have a direct democracy, or if you allow, a REAL democracy, but as far as I am aware, they are the only such democracy in the world today and in all of history. Personally I would prefer a sort of democratic neoconfusian techno-meritocracy, wherein people would not vote for candidates, but for the tests and various VR simulated scenarios submitted for consideration by experts in testing of psychological fitness and problem solving abilities that would be appropriate for the office being sought. Tests that would be open to all citizens at all times in order to challenge those who held various government offices, and replace them if they scored higher than the current occupant.
    1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. Before Facebook, before fake news, before incredible credibility gap, Google asked the general public for ideas that it should fund research into. I suggested a neutral nonprofit agency that would give every internet address that is a venue for information of any type a rating, for factualness of the information they are presenting and hoping to disseminate. . . . Crickets, in fact the crickets were so deafening that they still can't be heard. I can just hear the objections in the form of projections of rationalized complications because of this or that trivial factor. It would have made a difference. Now I am going to present myself, for the moment, as an irrelevant and fictitious personae who views themselves as knowing much more than the established recognized official experts in all matters having exclusively human, causal dynamics, because I do know more than them, so indulge my pronouncements as, though seemingly out of touch with official narratives, not only are they effective, but inescapable, unless you want your escape to be into a realm that is more like what you are presently attempting to escape than it is itself. But then why change something that hasn't worked in such a fine fashion up till now?' That dear reader is up to you. This is my one indulgence: playing Cassandra. Only this particular Cassandra is not only disinterested, but is exceedingly irrelevant, with nary a dog in the fight. I do not know if democracy is a desirable form of government. I do not know if it is a possible from of government. I do not even know with good faith that it has even ever existed as a form of government for a so called sovereign nation in all of history. One two three: but I do know this: . . . In order for democracy to transcend the status of a mere amalgamation of partisan viewpoints: in order for democracy to invoke the very physical epigenetic human potential of a large group to transcend the perception and conception of an individual in the consideration of questions they find relevant enough to hold up to democratic process, this process, cannot take place in a media of lies, rationalizations, guesses, opinion, and all manner of manipulation and disinformation. All you will get in such cases is confusion. Like you have. I refer you to the example of the jelly bean urn, like you find at a stare fair, or charity event. A huge glass urn, filled with so many jelly beans that you can only take your best guess. If the n is large enough, that is, if enough yokels buy a chance and take a guess, the tendency will always be for the average of all guesses to be more accurate than the most accurate individual guess. So to take the average answer would usually be taking the most accurate estimate. This is analogous to the manner in which the epigenetic democratic genius of large human groups can be utilized to succeed where even the best and brightest fail. With this one huge caveat: this cannot take place in a culture of lies, manipulation, propaganda, disinformation, etc. That would be the equivalent of having a hidden softball in the middle of the urn. You would still get a good answer, but not to the question you asked. You can let the superficial idea of democracy destroy the real significance of democracy by protecting every crackpot who wants to spout some idiotic psychotic nonsense or you can value the higher potential of democracy enough to establish iron clad contingencies for anyone presenting any information to the public. Which would necessary include fines and penalties for those individuals and organizations presenting fictions and delusional nonsense as facts. These penalties should include total confiscation of all property worldwide and banishment from the USA. That's what it takes for democracy to function at it's highest potential. Personally I prefer RetrConfucianTechnoMeritocracy sans tyrant and police state. But I can see that you prefer what is automatic. . . . Entropy, . . . go eat you big mac pink boy, drink that coke: swill that liquid barbiturate, you deserve it.
    1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. What is the reality? The reality is that Bernie is not only the most popular senator, not only the most popular politician in Congress, not only the most popular politician in the Country he is the most popular politician in the world -- because thinking and compassionate people the world over are praying that the USA will come out of this movement into unconsciousness and the promotion of a policies based on primitive emotions and knee-jerk reactions will come to an end. They know they need us, and they need us sane and humane if civilization is going to have any chance of surviving the psychopaths that have gotten themselves into positions of power via charisma and cunning. This is not a game. If the right-wing nuts like Mercer, and his flunkies, like Trump, maintain the reigns of power: your are getting a deal on a squirt gun while your house is in a fire storm of lies and disinformation, on subjects that will determine the lives of your children and perhaps yourself. End this insanity. Pick the right man for a change, not the richest, the best connected or the one that lies best, choose who you actually think is the best. . . not the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is the choice that Goldman Sachs and the other banksters will give you.  This is your one chance in your lifetime to vote for a real person who is not a cats paw for elements of corruption. It's not a sexy subject but it you pay attention, Bernie knows how important it is to get money out of elections. How important is it? It is the most important issue. It is the basis of the legalized bribery that insures that your elected official are there: not to represent the voice of the people, no, rather they are there to make sure that the voice of the people never gets a hearing, and if by some chance on some issue it does get a hearing they will make sure it is never acted upon. Don't be fearful and full of hate, humanity has a golden destiny that has been stolen from the many by the few. It is time to wake up and clarify our nation's values once more. Not in meaningless word or deceitful narratives designed to seduce by playing to fears and greed. We cannot move into the new age using a rear-view mirror for a guidance system. Don't be afraid, Bernie's views and positions are not more radical than the Scandinavian views and practices and even the vaunted quality of upward social mobility is higher in all of them then it is here. Not to mention personal happiness and financial security and safety. Don't let the people who own the media make you paranoid. They have a greedy reason for misrepresenting the fact as did Boomburg tonight with is talk of communism and such. It's just ridiculous that he could stand there and insult the public's intelligence so blatantly. Fear not, feel the Bern.
    1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062.  @Iambrendanjames  Yeah a philosopher king would be nice too. Problem is, no one who deserves total authority would be wanting it, let alone striving to gain it. Even the ancient Greeks knew that the last person on earth that should be given power over others is someone who desires it. On the other hand, the big problem with democracy, other than the fact that it doesn't actually exist anywhere, is that it cannot function in anything approaching it's apex, in a culture of lies, partisanship spin and masses of imbeciles that consider meta-analysis of clinical trials fake news, but mimes made up by stoners living in their mom's basement like Q, to be the real hidden truth. As Gurdjieff once said, "Even God has no defense against stupidity." And like some other bully once said "Democracy is the worst possible system, except for all the others." Personally I back the NeoCofucian TechnoMeritocracy movement that will develop out of necessity when there is an independent colony on Mars, waiting to reestablish human culture on Earth after it recovers from the next extinction level event, or the inevitable results of so many fools banging off the walls of their unrecognized insanity. Cheers. . . . Oh, and perhaps you can answer this: why are there so many damn people named Brendan all of a sudden, and why has everyone forgotten that the proper word to use to describe the dynamics like those involved in the Russian aggression in Ukraine is "relentless" not "unrelenting"? You will definitely get a gold star on the forehead if you can answer both.
    1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narratives that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues. You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  2068. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090.  @GeraldJimerson-me3lo  Regional Stability: A stable and secure Ukraine contributes to regional stability in Eastern Europe. A peaceful and stable neighborhood is in the best interest of the United States as it reduces the risk of conflict spillover and potential threats to U.S. allies in the region. Promotion of Democratic Values: Ukraine has been striving to strengthen its democratic institutions. U.S. support for Ukraine's democratic development aligns with American values and promotes the spread of democracy, rule of law, and good governance. Humanitarian Concerns: U.S. support for Ukraine helps address humanitarian concerns arising from conflicts. This includes assistance for internally displaced persons and refugees who may face displacement due to regional instability. Deterrence of Aggression: Supporting Ukraine sends a message to Russia and other potential aggressors that the United States stands firmly against the violation of international norms and territorial integrity. This deterrence effect can contribute to a more stable global security environment. Protection of Sovereignty: Upholding Ukraine's sovereignty reinforces the principle of territorial integrity, which is a cornerstone of international law. By supporting Ukraine's right to determine its own future, the U.S. strengthens the global norm against the unlawful annexation of territories. Energy Security: Ukraine is strategically located in terms of energy transit routes, particularly for natural gas. Ensuring a stable Ukraine can contribute to energy security in the region and reduce Europe's dependence on Russian energy sources, which has broader implications for global energy dynamics. Strategic Alliances: Supporting Ukraine strengthens U.S. partnerships with European allies who share common values and interests. It fosters a sense of solidarity within the transatlantic community, reinforcing the importance of collective security and cooperation. Counterterrorism Cooperation: A stable Ukraine is better equipped to address security challenges, including potential terrorism threats. Cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine in counterterrorism efforts can contribute to global security. Market Opportunities: As Ukraine develops economically, it can become a market for U.S. goods and services. Trade and economic ties with a stable and prosperous Ukraine can benefit American businesses and contribute to economic growth. Global Reputation: U.S. support for Ukraine enhances its reputation as a defender of international norms and a champion of sovereignty. This can positively influence the perception of the United States on the global stage. In summary, supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression aligns with U.S. interests in regional stability, the promotion of democratic values, deterrence of aggression, and the protection of global norms. It also fosters strategic alliances, enhances energy security, and opens up economic opportunities for the United States.
    1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124.  @DraconianPolicy  In my view the bases from which the people, at a fair for instance, would arrive at their individual estimates of the number of jelly beans in a large urn is subjective also.  They have no real objective measure either of the total volume of the urn or the volume taken up by each bean.  It is a guess based on limited, though unobscurated perception, and no real possibility of actual measurement.  This is a phenomenon that is noted by the emerging field of epigenetics. Pardon the pun.  So we have an actual situation wherein ants are able to function as an efficient colony, or humans are able to make the most accurate estimate of the number of beans by the average of all guesses. If you are interested in an entertaining exposition of same, Radio Lab did a show about this entitled Epigenetics, or something like that, .  If the result obtained by the mean of all the guesses were dependent on some form of objective measurement, then of course your objection would be valid. However this is not the case. This phenomenon would be equally in effect in a voting process that determined the goals and objectives of a government {not the winning candidate} when such choices were presented to the public without any spin of any kind.  For instance instead of voting for a person, all voting would be upon issues such as. "What percentage of the national budget should be spent on the military?" With a blank space in the ballot were a citizen could provide a percentage they believe to be appropriate.  Remember: this citizen has not been subjected to any disinformation or propaganda, or even any idiotic pundit spin, just such facts as are available at the time, without "expert" prognostication about the resulting impact of various outcomes.
    1
  2125.  @DraconianPolicy  Certainly though it can be said that there is no correct answer to such questions as that about the military budget, it could be seen that outlier answers such as "We should spend one hundred percent of the national budget on defense", will be balanced out by both the mass of opinion and the outlier opinions on the opposite end of such a continuum. It really doesn't matter to the mechanism in play if there is an objectively correct answer. This will still provide the best possible option at a higher rate than any other method that can be employed. You bring up the objection that everyone will be bringing their own prejudices to their personal opinions when they vote. Thus the death penalty for anyone that propagates falsehood or unsubstantiated news as facts.  Try to imagine a culture that is not awash in disinformation and propaganda by various interests. One were the pundits, instead of filling up air time with what will increase advertising revenue, will simply say, "I don't know." or "This matter is unknown or still in question." when addressing any issue that is not a proven fact. (Strangely reminds me of the Platonic debate as to whether new poetic forms would lead to the degeneration of society.}  As long as the populace is not immersed in disinformation from which they form their opinions, their individual attitudes will only serve to insure the effectiveness of the results of such questions. Though really this "democracy really works, but not why you think it does" proposition is a minor and really fungible element of the Techno-Neo Confucian course that I have proposed. We presently live in a world were some governments call themselves democracies and some communist, but the reality is that in both cases, with few exceptions, they are both functionally fascist.
    1
  2126. ​ @DraconianPolicy  Good points. Remember, I said that the best possible outcome was relative to the goals already defined by the populace itself. There is no doubt that not everyone would agree that any particular result chosen in this manner would be the best possible outcome. The reason an urn with jelly beans is chosen as an example is basically because it has been used to illustrate this quite unconscious ability of aggregate "minds" (most importantly to the un and pre conscious neural functions) to reach a conclusion that is beyond the abilities of a solitary mind to reach. The urn and beans is an example that is used because it is too complex of a problem for the average person to accurately resolve by the available methods. I will mention if it isn't explicit that we are dealing with a huge urn of a shape complex enough to defy the use of simple geometric formulation. But to simplify: my position is that the same aggregate unconscious dynamic will give as much advantage in reaching decisions that are most congruent with the goals for society: that the populace has already chosen. Decisions on policy that are far more effective in reaching the stated goals of such legislation than would be those not only of the average person but also so-called leaders and pundits in the very fields addressed. In the realm of symbolic logic you are correct to point out the distinction between the urn problem and more seemingly abstract and complex situations with divers variables. In this sense I agree with your objections, however I submit that this dynamic if properly employed will be effective even though it's mechanism is not fully understood. I found the RadioLab show that I had recommended. It is very entertaining. Emergence aug 14, 2007 and touches on various counter intuitive results of emergence. (I don't know why I remembered this as a show on epigenetics but I was incorrect) It would be interesting to set up an experiment to investigate this effect. You have pointed out in your discussion how the best possible option is subjective, I maintain that this is not the case because the result could be judged in an objective sense relative to an already stated goal. This discussion could go on, I suppose, however I believe that with a large enough sample it could be experimentally illustrated, even if the underlying mechanism of such a processed decision cannot be currently delineated. Did you know that the only democracy in the world today is in the nation of Switzerland? I also cannot think of any in past history, despite all the praise for past slave holding republics and such.
    1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. Politics sucks ass. Isn't it apparent to everyone by now that our political system is an archaic artifact? An artifact based on humanities inability to escape it's bestial warlike nature . . . :campaigns, winner take all victories, leaders who neither lead (excepting the advancement of the concerns of their patrons) nor have the wisdom to make intelligent impartial decisions on the issues of the day. This political web of deceit is a self-perpetuating parasite that warps collective social culture and is itself continually warped due to shameful self-interested exploitation by those who control the economy through control of debt manipulation. Interests and principalities that spew false narratives which have contaminated every aspect of our expectations of daily life, and our future aspirations (or lack of them). I suggest to you that there are other alternatives. Far more efficient alternatives, that would benefit the whole of society and reduce the corruption that is not only a systemic disease of our political system, but is now the very sinew, marrow, and circulatory system, of a body politic that has done everything possible to free itself from both morality and justice through legislative and legal complexities, technicality, outright lies, and all manner of fuckery. It is time to evolve folks. Like a cool pool on a hot day, once you take the plunge it's refreshing and rejuvenating, but before you take that plunge there is hesitation and a resistance to a state change. And we must change the state of our state unless we consider moving into the future by looking through a rear-view mirror and stepping on our own dicks every step of the way while perpetually bitiching about it to be some kind of desirable human prerogative. Because as it is, it will never be able to meet our real human needs or provide anything more than updated reruns of the same old conundrums. If human culture and civilization is to advance it must evolve to a higher state, a higher system of state, which will nurture higher states of mind in the populace, not continually drag it back by aggravating the primal survival instinct in a technological environment wherein this instinct is counterproductive on numerous levels. I suggest to you that a body politic based on a NeoConfusian Techno-Meritocracy would not only be vastly superior for the state of the state, state of the economy, state of human advancement, and our collective state of mind, that any comparison to the present drunken knife fight in a gilded bordello that passes for our government would be comical.
    1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. This whole subject is the babble of the insane puritanical conditioning of the populace by the psychopaths that are in control. These laws create a climate in which people turn to street drugs and the hell our laws hand to them. It is insane to think that prohibition works. It does not work and it has never worked. Even in countries with death penalties for use and sale of drugs, it does not work. Opioids are one of the most benign drugs you can use long term. Less harmful than common over the counter drugs that the fools who believe these laws take regularly. Switzerland solved their heroin problem by making it freely available to addicts. What happened? They self titrated and went back to work instead of being out on the street trying to come up with the money for dealers.  This whole problem is self-created. Perhaps we should return to the ultra insane times when doctors and loved ones would withhold pain meds from those in their care who were dying in agony, because they did not want them to become addicted in the final months of their lives. This used to happen all the time, not so long ago. I witnessed it happen to a beloved great aunt when I was a teenager. Anyone who supports this policy is an idiot and thinks that doing the same thing that doesn't work over and over again is a good idea. Why were opioids made illegal in the first place? Because the miners and other factory serfs in England began to prefer tinctures of opium as opposed to alcohol. With good reason. So of course the distillers demonized the use of same. While the facts are that opioids are far less harmful than alcohol or even than tylenol. If you don't know these facts, and I suspect you do not. You basically know nothing about what you have commented on. Which is par for the course on the net. If you really dislike drug dealers, both criminal and noncriminal, then you should be in favor of complete decriminalization of all molecules, and the sanction for anyone to grow any plant they want to and use it themselves, like any free adult should be able to do. Then a person could grow a little plot of poppies and treat their own pain.
    1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239.  @lostpony4885  Yes: my guess is that at first silver and gold will be the money, then as the harsh reality dawns on people, freeze dried food, seed, and bullets. Then we will eat each other and our babies, like has happened so many times before in famines. If this were inevitable it would be one thing, but we could totally reverse the climate change in very little time, but -- and this is a big but -- we would have to reforest all the land that has been cleared for the grazing of livestock. And basically people would have to stop eating meat and dairy products, which they are quite addicted to. So, though complete wasteland, like you find in the Middle East can be revived in just a few years, by stopping the grazing of sheep and goats and replanting native grasses, also the meat and dairy industry would have to disappear because people stopped buying their products. By the reforestation of the land that is now used for grazing, we would reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases by 87%. It is not just the one percent and their political minions that would have to evolve consciously, it is the average person. That I find most improbable. What I see happening is too little too late, and a massive die off of humanity, with the end of civilization as we know it. And of course the one percent, hiding in their bunkers in New Zealand and private islands, will eventually be dug out and killed in horrible ways. -- Just saying. Maybe Elon Musk and company will do better on Mars, if they make it, and eventually re-civilize a world that has descended into a new dark age.
    1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. The truth about climate change! The truth about climate change is that greenhouse gases are the main cause of global warming. The truth about greenhouse gases is that 87% of the greenhouse gas is produced by animal agriculture. The truth about fighting for the future of civilization is that it is a far more significant act to stop buying and using the products of animal agriculture than it is to march and bitch about any of the many different processes that in total, combined, only account for 13% of the greenhouse gases that humans produce. The truth about humans is that they would rather bitch and moan or ignore the situation until the choice is not whether one should adjust their rapacious lifestyle to have a diet that is plant based, but rather whether or not their grandchildren should eat their babies in order to live a little longer. The fact that it is healthier to eat a nutritionally dense plant based diet than any other kind, is, along with saving advanced human civilization, also of some benefit. The truth about ignorance, is that the new modern form of ignorance, such as that proudly exhibited by the Trump cultists, is not the lack of facts, but rather total immunity to them. The truth about the chances of avoiding a major disruption of all human civilization is about the same as it is for the people who are too stupid to realize how dumb they are to suddenly become ashamed of their ignorance instead of being proud of it. . . . Or about the same chance as someone who is addicted to meat and dairy coming to understand that what is killing them is also destroying the very fabric that makes the environment habitable by humans. So much easier to belief the disinformation diffused by the meat and dairy industries, who have taken a page from the tobacco handbook -- one only needs to instill doubt about real scientific data by introducing biased lies posing as science, brought to you by the same evil bastards who fought in the courts and arena of public opinion championing tobacco. Don't point your fingers at the pollution caused by ICE automobiles, or jets, or electric generators running on coal or oil, these causes are important, yes, but diversionary. Look in the mirror when you sit down to eat, if you are eating meat or dairy products, then you are personally advancing the degradation of the world climate, and your concerns about climate change, if you have any, are essentially hypocrisy.
    1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. Comment part 1 Sheltered as I am, and as much a fool as I allow myself to be on a daily basis: I will now proceed my pouring from the empty into the void by giving a brief outline of how an optimal human government should be arranged. In fact, one objective look at the so-called political systems, and their underpinning, that populate our planet should inform the observer that what is happening is just window dressing on barbarism, it's just a theater of the mind, a velvet glove on an iron fist. I don't know of any system of government or rule that rises above the idiotic, or so it would seem, if the object of the system is to optimize, as much as is possible, all honorable aspects of human existence, and to curtail those commonly deemed as undesirable, the present systems of governance found on earth are archaic trash: just an excuse for the same old kleptocratic autocompulsive psychopaths, to further inflate their already vein-glorious mini-minds in the vacuous reflections of the sycophants that surround and enable their insanity because of their own highly deviated and corrupted survival impulse. They wish they were a real boy, but despite the world of suffering they create by trying to fill their truly vacuous lives with babbles of all types, real life eludes them, and always will. Even ole' Socrates knew that a person that seeks power should never be trusted with it. Human political culture is a joke. An eighth grade class could come up with a better system than the battered whore the banksters and one percent -- have afforded the world. It's a joke, a sin, and a wasted opportunity to evolve our culture into one that would nurture the greatness that humanity could be. But we ain't great, and we never have been, though for sure, an individual here and there, now and then has been -- great that is. Though to tell you the truth Alexander wasn't, and neither was his teacher Aristotle. Two utter failures that the world has adored for over two millennia. So wad ya gonna due -- aye? Real democracy is something usually only found in a direct democracy. Representational Democracy, Republics, Constitutional Republic, etc, are a device used to lead the capite censi to believe that they live in a participatory democracy while allowing the plutocrats to stay in control of the things that matter to them. A few prefectures in Switzerland have a direct democracy, or if you allow, a REAL democracy, but as far as I am aware, they are the only such democracy in the world today and in all of history. Personally I would prefer a sort of democratic neoconfusian techno-meritocracy, wherein people would not vote for candidates, but for the tests and various VR simulated scenarios submitted for consideration by experts in testing of psychological fitness and problem solving abilities that would be appropriate for the office being sought. Tests that would be open to all citizens at all times in order to challenge those who held various government offices, and replace them if they scored higher than the current occupant.
    1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374.  @feynmanschwingere_mc2270  I see you have a sense of humor, but ultimately no sense of sense. FYI: America's most intense growth rate had more to do with the fact that almost all other means of production had been demolished in WW2 than the tax rate. So the USA was producing about half of all manufactured goods worldwide. Although I personally would like to see a return to the tax rates of the Eisenhower era, the current legalized corruption of campaign finance laws will never allow anything but more of the present dynamic and perhaps an even more weighted version of it. The American middle class was mostly the result of the GI bill post WW2. Communism and Fascism are about mutually evil in effect if not theory, though communism clearly has the lead in murders of its own citizens. Climate change is a fact, whether or not it is ultimately a positive or negative has yet to be known: we are overdue for another ice age. Which would render all our considerations moot forever. Well my fore-bearers fought for the north and were part of the underground railroad in PA, and fought in the Revolutionary war, but in America, that actually counts for nothing, and any immigrate is as American as I am. You do know that by far most of the slaves brought to America went to Brazil and Cuba, and that only five percent of southerners actually had any slaves. You do know that though it is rarely brought up by left wing puddin' heads, there were more African slaves exported into the middle east than the Americas, and that almost everyone alive is the descendant of slaves, as opposed to King Arthur and Cleopatra. I am still waiting for my reparations from the Catholic Church for enslaving some of my ancestors during Rome. Of course there is a big difference between being worked to death in a Roman lead mine and being worked in a cotton field. For two centuries Islamic pirates raided every coastal town in Europe for slaves, maybe the Saudis should pay reparations for the millions of people worked to death in the name of Islam, because white slaves were so cheap in the north African slave markets that it often did not make economic sense to even feed them enough to survive. IQ is associated with race: Asians and Jews are the most intelligent, although the concept of race is a total illusion. There are about seven main human genetic variants and five of them appear only in Africa. Races of man are most like breeds of dog, not actual subspecies, just various characteristics brought about by variying rates of inbreeding or line-breeding because of geography and social factors. But along these lines, I bet that you would deny the different levels of testosterone in various "racial" groups and its effect on a propensity to violent behavior. As a survivor of a murderous attack by a black mob against anyone who was white in 1968, and further attacked at a black power rally in 69' which I attended with a black friend in support, I have no illusions about the capacity of all groups to revert to mindless violence, Nazis or not. OH yeah, I am neither a believer nor an atheist nor a Agnostic, I think the question of is there a god is wrong. About your final comment: you flatter yourself, how pedestrian. You gun is a pop gun son.
    1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narratives that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues. You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414.  @toomuch8232  I have learned to differentiate between bullshit and reality which apparently you have not. You don't know the difference between communism, socialism, and the form of capitalism known as democratic socialism. All you seem to have learned is the brainwashing that the power-elite spoon feeds fools 24/7. Fact: All the democratic socialist countries are capitalist. Fact: Neither Venezuela, nor Cuba is a social democracy. Fact: All the democratic socialist countries have, better and less expensive medical care than we do -- unless you are very wealthy and even then in many cases they are superior. Fact: All the democratic socialist countries have free or very inexpensive higher education. Fact: All the democratic socialist countries have financial safety nets and inexpensive or free childcare, and maternity leaves for both parents. Fact: All the democratic socialist countries have paid vacations that are usually about five weeks a year. Fact: The citizens of democratic socialist countries are happier than Americans on average. Fact: And this one should just make you slap your face if you have a brain in your head: All the democratic socialist countries have higher social mobility than the USA. That mean that if you are born into the lower financial class you have a better chance of ending up rich in Denmark then you do in the USA. So it seem that you are the one who has learned nothing in all your years. I, on the other hand started out as a near fascist libertarian/republican, but learned the truth about the power-elite who rule our country through deceit and disinformation, and when that doesn't work, through paid off politicians and men with guns. You can easily verify all the facts yourself, if you even have the smarts to actually tell truth from right-wingnut propaganda. Which I highly suspect you don't and will rather respond with nothing but more meaningless bullshit.
    1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421.  @YourHineyness  I have reason to be optimistic: LIfe has an urgent desire to survive and evolution is the prime determinant of survival. At this point evolution is no longer dependent on natural selection (if indeed it ever was). Though lame ideas of transferring an individuals identity and memories into an inorganic mechanism are held by some, I personally hold the opinion that the problem of deterioration and death will be overcome by bio-science (if it has not already been) Such as the research of Dr. H. Katcher and his discovery of the rejuvenation potential in E5 plasma borne nano particles. Imagine what potential will be tapped when the leading minds and geniuses in the sciences do not loose their mental acuity with age, or age biologically at all. Instead of educating and training new people to take up their torches, they could just go on. The demographics are meaningless if people stop aging and dying. We are talking about a procedure that will be affordable and available to everyone. Add in the Tesla bots and the advances that AI will make possible and there you have it. Can we, or some religious nut-job screw the pooch for the planet? It is a possibility, but Life itself is alive and I doubt very much if that is in the cards except as a conceptual postulate. What I do see as "in the cards" for humanity is a golden destiny among the stars with infinite resources and the expansion and "destupidification of humanity, as the physical reality of what the collective unconscious vaguely alluded to, via the myths and stories of most major religions (may they and the mindless dupes who take them literally disappear and take their divisiveness with them) become the physical reality for the many that they have been at times for the enlightened few.
    1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425.  @R4dr1ar  Not really. Take December sales for which we have good data. Best selling VW model VW e-up sold 7, 789 cars. Best selling Tesla model -- model 3 sold 27,445. Second best VW model ID4 sold 6,790 units. Second best selling Tesla model Y sold 8,085. In fact Telsa model 3 sold more units than the four top selling VW group EVs combined. And noi the new Tesla plant in Germany is ramping up. So the cars will be built in Germany, and many of the parts are made in Germany even for American made Teslas, and large parts of the car were engineered in Germany, so that along with the fact that Tesla is the number one selling BEV in Europe, and the most desired throws a little factual light on your fantastic assumptions. All models sold for months in advance, your idea that Europeans don't trust American cars just falls apart. The quality of the Teslas made at the new plants is phenomenal, and we expect the Teslas built in Germany to be the best Teslas in the world, until Austin gears up. Then they wlll be some of the best Teslas built. Customer support could use some improvement, and that is just the nature of a business that is expanding so rapidly. I mean basically the ideas you expressed have no basis in reality. Unless you accept the yammerings of the commercial media and auto media as reality, and anyone who knows how the sausage is made with free junkets, and free cars, and free gas to reviewers, and hundreds of millions spent on advertising time and space in the same media that reviews cars, knows that Tesla doesn't do any of that. They do not advertise, they do not have special vehicles that they loan out for reviews and testing, which all other OEMs do, and they do not wine and dine the media. Surely you can figure out where you went wrong. It is a common mistake, that will be totally rectified when your neighbor buys a Tesla and tells you all about it. And you idea that everyone will be able to do over the air updates like Tesla now can, in a few years is a huge assumption, and nearly delusional based on the data to date. Tesla cars have one software dev, VW EVs have like hundreds of different software developers that they are trying to integrate, and not doing so well at it. Tesla is a different generation than all its competition and they will never catch up because Tesla innovates at a greater pace than any of them. In five years some will have caught up to were Tesla is now, but Tesla will be long gone. Solid gone. Take a look at the built quality of the German Teslas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBgahsGyj9U&list=TLPQMjkwMzIwMjL2ux5T7bf3Zw&index=2
    1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. The corporate news is still trying to black-out Bernie. Bernie, and Tulsi are the only candidates with any integrity, something the networks and cable news despises. Bernie understands that the lynch-pin of all the legalized corruption in our constitutional republic is campaign finance. What now passes for "business as usual" was not long ago a criminal act. But many progressives do not understand this. They are bored by the subject but excited by all kinds of meaningless PC rhetoric. While I was at a Nader rally in Santa Cruz back during his 2000 run, he said he had time for one more question. I yelled out "Campaign finance!" When he indicated that this was the subject he would address there was an audible groan from this most progressive crowd in America's most leftest town, . I guess most people never consider the fact that if Nader had won, we would have never attacked Iraq and the 2008 great recession (where-in the same people who caused it were put in charge of fixing it and managed to steal trillions in public funds for themselves and the institutions they hid their criminal activities behind) would never have occurred. And I would like to remind everyone that the criminals behind this, who had bribed the legislative branch with campaign contributions, were also the people who changed the laws to allow this disastrous turn of our republic. Which was unequaled until the retrograde idiot section of the supreme court passed Citizens United and other decisions of a antiAmerican nature that benefited the one-percent and their brain-washed right-wing idiot minions. Sorry if this comment went on for longer than a Twitter-brain can attend to. But if you notice, the comments that always get the most likes are always the most obvious and usually the most knee-jerk in nature. Never believe the "first-story": whether given by the government, the corporate news, the republocrats, or your own reactionary quite mechanical mind
    1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464.  Allan 112358  So far you have said nothing. Go ahead, state your objective. You claim to be looking for new forms. Here's a new form. The simple truth about power: Power should never be entrusted to anyone who seeks it. We knew this all the way back in the golden age of the Athenian hegemony. This includes everyone: both the golden boy of the right-wing nuts, and the wanna-be populists who take a mike at a protest. Power should never be entrusted to anyone who seeks it: for any reason. Power should only be given to a person who doesn't want it and has been found to be the best person for the job. This is why we should turn from our psuedo-republic, which is really a plutocratic kleptocracy to a neoconfusian meritocracy where all positions of power are temporarily held by those found most adequate by means of testing and virtual scenarios devised by scientists and voted on by the populace. The populace would not vote for people but for the various tests devised to select the office holders. I am aware of the objections some would have to this but they are nothing that cannot be resolved by technical means, such as the top scorers being tested further in secure conditions. These tests would be mandatory for every citizen at regular intervals, and whoever scores highest would assume the position they tested for during the next regular government upgrade. This would be superior in every respect to the plutocratic kleptocracy we are now enslaved by. And all forms of cheating could be easily overcome by technical means.
    1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487.  @Tomzuki.  Since YOuTube will not allow a link to an outside source that would explain to you the fundamentals of moto suspension here is what Chat GPT has to say on the matter. Low unsprung mass is crucial in motorcycles used on the street for several reasons: Improved Handling and Responsiveness: Unsprung mass refers to the weight of components not supported by the suspension system, such as wheels, tires, and part of the motorcycle's suspension. Reducing unsprung mass enhances the motorcycle's ability to respond quickly to changes in the road surface. This results in improved handling, better maneuverability, and increased responsiveness, especially during cornering and quick direction changes. Enhanced Suspension Performance: A lower unsprung mass allows the suspension system to react more efficiently to bumps, irregularities, and other road imperfections. The suspension can follow the contours of the road more accurately, providing a smoother and more controlled ride. This is particularly important for street motorcycles where comfort and stability are essential. Increased Traction: Lower unsprung mass contributes to better tire contact with the road surface. Improved traction is essential for safe street riding, especially during acceleration, braking, and cornering. With reduced unsprung mass, the tires can maintain better contact with the road, leading to enhanced grip and stability. Reduced Vibrations and Fatigue: Motorcycles with lower unsprung mass tend to experience fewer vibrations transmitted from the road to the rider. This not only enhances comfort but also reduces rider fatigue during long rides. The overall smoothness of the ride contributes to a more enjoyable and less tiring experience for street riders. Braking Performance: Low unsprung mass is beneficial for braking performance. The reduced weight in the unsprung components allows the braking system to work more effectively, resulting in quicker and more controlled stops. This is crucial for street motorcycles where sudden stops may be necessary in traffic or emergency situations. Fuel Efficiency: While the impact on fuel efficiency may be relatively small, reducing unsprung mass can contribute to overall energy efficiency. Lighter components require less energy to move, and this can result in slightly improved fuel economy. In summary, low unsprung mass in street motorcycles enhances handling, responsiveness, traction, and overall ride quality. These factors are vital for a positive riding experience, safety, and performance on the diverse road conditions encountered in everyday street riding.
    1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. Democrats Load Platform Committee to Stop Progressive Movement Democrats Load Platform Committee to Stop Progressive Movement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1NlZTH70e8 DNC Chair Tom Perez is stacking party committees to sideline Sanders and to push a corporate agenda that kills progressive ideas and campaigns. How much more evidence do people need to understand that the DNC is composed of cheating compromised co-opted scumbags? Slowly via the new distributed media of the internet people are learning about their continuing ongoing dirty tricks in the service of their oligarch masters. The cheating has already begun with the introduction of an app that Iowa caucus will use to report local results. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbrvAu7g4w8 From the sellouts at NPR: Iowa's Democrats hope the new app lets the party get results out to the public quicker, says Troy Price, the chairman of the state party. In an interview, Price declined to provide more details about which company or companies designed the app, or about what specific measures have been put in place to guarantee the system's security. But security is a priority, he says. The state party worked with the national party's cybersecurity team, and with Harvard University's Defending Digital Democracy project, but Price declined to answer directly whether any third party has investigated the app for vulnerabilities, as many cybersecurity experts recommend. "We as the party have taken this very seriously, and we know how important it is for us to make sure that our process is secure and that we protect the integrity of the process," Price says. "We want to make sure we are not relaying information that could be used against us." Unlike many states in which local and state officials oversee the presidential primary election, in Iowa the state party is responsible for administering, staffing and funding the caucuses, relying primarily on trained but unpaid volunteers. Cybersecurity experts interviewed by NPR said that the party's decision to withhold the technical details of its app doesn't do much to protect the system — and instead makes it hard to have complete confidence in it. "The idea of security through obscurity is almost always a mistake," says Doug Jones, a computer science professor at the University of Iowa and a former caucus precinct leader. "Drawing the blinds on the process leaves us, in the public, in a position where we can't even assess the competence of the people doing something on our behalf." DNC Chair Tom Perez is stacking party committees to sideline Sanders and to push a corporate agenda that kills progressive ideas and campaigns. How much more evidence do people need to understand that the DNC is composed of cheating compromised co-opted scumbags? Slowly via the new distributed media of the internet people are learning about their continuing ongoing dirty tricks in the service of their oligarch masters. The cheating has already begun with the introduction of an app that Iowa caucus will use to report local results.
    1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. We should all just listen to the best president of all time and do exactly what he says. Because it's obvious from how the people around him behave that he is the best and has a real handle on the reality of the situation. I mean any man with his name on buildings all over the world must be a great leader. Stop all the bitching and fact checking and line up and applaud him and watch everything he does and listen to every thing he says. He is so fascinating and not like all you dumb experts and intellectuals, he is entertaining like a slow motion train wreck. And like the pope he cannot be wrong. Actually he is every bit a real life super-hero. He is a very stable genius and all the tuff people support him. And they have guns and the democrats mostly don't. Yeh Trump, best president ever, and the savior of the USA. And stop laughing at his hair and fake tan, he is supposed to look his best he is the spokes-model for the USA. Trump totally represents us and theAmericans who voted him in are really smart and the envy of the world. Plus he has the best ratings. So: all you smart asses out there just remember whatever you do, do not laugh in this god-like mans face, no matter what he says. You just do not have the superior IQ like him, and don't understand how deeply profound his statements are, and that they are both earnest and sarcastic at the same time. He is a quantum president and his statements only mean what he says in retrospect like Schrodinger's cat statements. He is magic, almost like Jesus or Hitler, and if you openly laugh at him, he will punish us by going away. So don't laugh in his face when you are with him in person, not that anyone near him has the balls or ovaries to do it anyway. A point he proves everyday, you delightful scallywags and misanthropic sycophants. Good job, how did we ever deserved the wonderful leaders we have. Without you guys we would really be hard pressed to find a war worth fighting and that would hurt the economy.
    1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. The corporate news is still trying to black-out Bernie. Bernie, and Tulsi are the only candidates with any integrity, something the networks and cable news despises. Bernie understands that the lynch-pin of all the legalized corruption in our constitutional republic is campaign finance. What now passes for "business as usual" was not long ago a criminal act. But many progressives do not understand this. They are bored by the subject but excited by all kinds of meaningless PC rhetoric. While I was at a Nader rally in Santa Cruz back during his 2000 run, he said he had time for one more question. I yelled out "Campaign finance!" There was an audible groan from this most progressive crowd in America's most leftest town, when he indicated that this was the subject he would address. I guess most people never consider the fact that if Nader had won, we would have never attacked Iraq and the 2008 great recession (where-in the same people who caused it were put in charge of fixing it and managed to steal trillions in public funds for themselves and the institutions they hid their criminal activities behind) would never have occurred. And I would like to remind everyone that the criminals behind this, who had bribed the legislative branch with campaign contributions, were also the people who changed the laws to allow this disastrous turn of our republic. Which was unequaled until the retrograde idiot section of the supreme court passed Citizens United and other decisions of a antiAmerican nature that benefited the one-percent and their brain-washed right-wing idiot minions. Sorry if this comment went on for longer than a Twitter-brain can attend to. But if you notice, the comments that always get the most likes are always the most obvious and usually the most knee-jerk in nature. Never believe the "first-story": whether given by the government, the corporate news, the republocrats, or your own reactionary quite mechanical mind
    1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. Have to say you peeked my interest in this matter. It was easy to find Hyman on a list of MDs who you should not trust. And on a quack list along with Grundy and other perveyors of unscientific nonsense. Here is some of what I found. ". . . Mark Hyman’s pseudoscience includes popular detox diets (which also means buying his questionable – and expensive – detox supplements), giving health advice that is not backed by the body of scientific evidence, and promoting a bogus autism cure. He also propagates the false belief that vaccines are related to autism, and false information about heavy metals. He recommends bogus testing for heavy metals and expensive “chelation” therapy (a test that may be harmful) that he has ordered on “tens of thousands of patients.” Harriet Hall, MD has a excellent pieced about Mark Hyman and functional medicine that includes the following: “He sells dietary supplements and detox cleanses. He has said that the law of thermodynamics doesn’t apply in living organisms, and that current medicine is as obsolete as bloodletting or phrenology. He says diseases don’t exist. He is essentially a germ theory denialist, saying it’s the terrain, not the germ.” “Hyman includes standard advice about a healthy lifestyle, but he mixes it indiscriminately with advice that is based on speculation rather than on credible evidence. And he makes claims that defy belief (curing autism with cod liver oil) and many that are demonstrably not true.” Hyman is listed on Quackwatch as an author whose books promote misinformation, espouse unscientific theories, and/or contain unsubstantiated advice. He also advises GOOP, and his advice seems to be in line with other GOOP Doctors. When scientific experts reviewed evidence on fats and cardiovascular disease and it didn’t align with Hyman’s own ideas, he endorsed an article by “RebootedBody.com” promoting the idea that the American Heart Association is a terrorist organization. Here’s another example of his misinformation (and fear-mongering) from Mark Hyman’s twitter account, a comment about wheat and sugar that does not make biochemical or nutritional sense. . . . " etc. So, I personally will stick with the actual science, not the "keep them in doubt" science offered by the divers studies sponsered by the meat and dairy industry, or snake oil salesmen who went to med school. People consider any MD as experts in nutrition, while nothing could be further from the truth. Unless they have pursued it as an independent study after med school they typically know very little about nutrtition. But people love to let "authorities" do their thinking for them. I am in my seventies and Hyman looks like he could be my father. I do not eat animal products, I lift weights, and can keep it up all night. That's my anecdotal two cents. I get plenty of protein from plant sources and the belief that animal sources of protein are necessary for healthy aging is proven nonsense.
    1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. Not just Portugal, Switzerland ended their criminal junky problem by offering free drugs in clincil settings along with the offer of therapy. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  2577. 1
  2578. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. Trump is doomed, and Tesla is not going to do good in a recession. The last man to down size the CIA was Jimmy Carter. Many of the operatives that were given the boot had expertise in destabilizing governments and targeted economies, as evidence by their previous work in South America, and elsewhere. Many of these operative went to work for the RNC. Just by "coincidence" the Arabs embargoed oil, just by coincidence the US embassy in Iran was attacked and the staff taken hostage. Just by "coincidence" the rescue mission was a failure. Just by coincidence the US economy went into a tail spin and there were lines of cars for miles at gas stations IF that had any gas, and lines around the block at the SS offices nationwide. Just by coincidence the hostages in Iran were released the day Ronald Reagan won the election. Just by coincidence the man who had been the head of the CIA was his vice president, and the future POTUS. You are already seeing where the economy is going. Get ready for a real recession. One that will make the public squeal with pain. That is how they got rid of Carter, who was at least an honest man, and that is how they are going to get rid or Trump and his flunkys -- wholesale. I will be amazed if both Trump and Vance live for another four years. They done F'd with the wrong people, and you can already see where this is going. Unfortunately we will all feel the pain until Trump and his band of stumble bums is gone. Cause they are going to wreck the economy, and in his ignorance Trump is even helping them.
    1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. How to explain Russian inexplicable behavior? Firstly you must pretend that you are not dealing with a nation as you expect them to be in the west. It is best if you imagine that you are dealing with a mob of drunk teenagers who have been left a pile of weapons and deadly toys to play with, and like to dress up like actual government officials and service men. But really they just want to drink and everything else is a side gig. Then most of their decisions will make sense. Then it is always important to understand the form of Russian humor. Take irony for instance. The Russian form of ironic humor is to accuse other countries of doing what they themselves are trying to cover up or hide. This is important because you can tell exactly what they are doing by just adding up whatever they are accusing others of doing. Then there is the map delusion. Don't get me wrong Russia has a huge amount of useless land, BUT Russia is not nearly as large relative to other countries as it appears on the map. This is because of the type of projection that is commonly used to transfer the outlines of countries from a sphere onto a plane. There are websites like Real Size, which allow you to superimpose the outlines of one country onto another. Soon as Russia is moved toward the equator it shrivels like a dick in an ice bath. Same thing happens to Canada and Alaska, but they didn't let the false sense of enormity inflate their puddin' heads like Putin did. Russia hates LBGTQand whatever, but all the hottest trannies on the internet are Russian. Go figure. . . . One or two of them even look like a young Vlad (or so I am told ;))
    1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. News flash: CNN, MSNBC, and the usual suspects report:. . . In the primary race between Sanders and Buttigieg, Pete came in second over all, while Sanders came in next to last. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Real democracy, true democracy exists nowhere on earth other than present day Switzerland and never has (that I am aware of). Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. And you CNN, are a big part of it. In fact people will come to recognize that you are a key member of the new axis of evil. FaceBook -- Buttigieg -- CNN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfQ7Zo6m9yg
    1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. Comment part 2 However here are some of my thoughts on democracy and how it can work. In observing certain social animals, like ant colonies and bee hives, it is apparent that certain capacities are actualized of which the individual animals themselves are incapable. These are sometimes referred to as emergent functions, some of which are assumed to come about because of the activation of certain epigenetic potentials in the genome given the proper protein to initiate them. This is debatable, however the functions themselves are easily observable. Humans are also capable of emergent functioning -- in a political sense. Here is an example of this in action: We are all familiar with a type of game of chance that one sometimes comes across at a charity event or perhaps a county fair. There will be a large urn or similar vessel and it will contain tens of thousands of jelly beans or marbles or gumballs or something. And typically you make a donation or buy a "chance" and then you make a guess as to how may jelly beans are in the urn. Of course it is impossible to count the jelly beans and it is also very difficult to even make any kind of accurate estimation. So usually thousands of people will make a guess and put it in a box and then the most accurate guess wins a prize, like a car or something. Well as it turns out: the average of all of the guesses is almost always (actually "always", but I am hedging) more accurate than the best guess. . . . Now it is true there is no one obscuring parts of the urn or extolling the virtues of certain sets of numbers or otherwise lying to the guessers with false narratives about the jelly beans or the process of guessing. Of course there is no Donald Trump, or FOx news, or CNN spinning false narratives about the jelly beans or telling you that there is a large grapefruit unseen in the middle of the urn that is displacing patriotic American jelly beans, so it is not exactly the same thing as a democratic vote on legislation or some other political decision. Yet I do believe that this human potential could be brought to bear in a political scenario: if, for instance, something like fines and imprisonment or perhaps huge fines and banishment where the consequence for presenting anything but verifiable facts as evidence in arguing for or against any particular collective democratic decision. And perhaps, just maybe this collective talent could also be mobilized on a level of finer granularity by calling into question the false narratives and other deceptions of the power-elite and their legions of sycophantic wannabes to themselves be objects of observation and study as is now happening via the decentraization of political commentary and criticism made possible by the internet. So, potentially, democracy may still have some very significant tricks up it's venerable sleeve, only this time, tricks for the good instead of the in the service of evil. And perhaps some day we could be supplemented in these quandaries by the kind of advanced AI and machine learning that can beat the champions at GO. A game that seems to me, to be very like our political process. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. We have known forever that it would be best to get all money out of politics if the most ethical and fair government is what you want. We have known forever that proportional representation is superior to winner-takes-all seesaws. We have known that the banks are incapable of regulating themselves and that the wealth of the nation is being sucked up by the military industrial professional political worker complex, that the drug war is a farce that has created the first billionaire criminal organizations. In our hollowed out lives, news has become entertainment. And the fantasyland they present to the public is a poor substitute for what should have been the golden destiny of mankind on earth and in regions beyond.
    1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647.  @Starsurfer74  . . . "defend your country in areas where they are really needed?" You mean now? At this moment? You think the troops in action are defending you? Man have you swallowed the cool-aid. As for your other comment: I always like it when someone displays both their ignorance and inability to do the least little search before they spout their knee-jerk opinions. It's not an either or thing, they used the legion and slaves. From Alberto Yagos on Quora -- literally the first response on Google. Are you that lazy? . . . 'With so many engineers and men trained, when they made a Roman permanent fort they also built accessory buildings like baths, headquarters and even civil construction like several buildings outside the fort (cabannae), the ones for the legionaries’ families (before and after they were allowed to marry), aqueducts, bridges, roads, amphitheaters… On his return Corbulo set his legionaries to digging a massive canal between the rivers Meuse and Rhine. The legions were immensely useful for infrastructure development; trained legionaries could be used directly for tasks as road building or seconded to lend their skills to civic provincial projects. For example, legionary engineers generally oversaw the civilian construction of amphitheatres and aqueducts The Roman Empire Parallels from Britain (where ancient timbers are better preserved) suggest that although the Romans were aware of the properties of various types of wood, military construction usually relied on local timber, even if inferior; from this we may infer that army units were probably cutting their own lumber. Vegetius (writing in the fourth century, but the statement may be true for earlier periods as well) confirms that 'the legion also has carpenters... and the other artisans necessary for the building of winter quarters'. Moreover, soldiers were undoubtedly utilised to assist in civil construction; we know for instance that the Fourth and Sixth Legions built roads in Navarra under Augustus, while the Seventh Legion helped construct the bridge at Aquae Flaviae in 79. Roman Spain (Routledge Revivals) Amphitheatres... many legionary examples produce direct evidence of having been constructed by the army Handbook to Roman Legionary Fortresses According to van Enckevort (2005), only the army and not the local elite possessed the means to transport the building stone used in these projects, and this claim appears to be borne out by the use of different forms of stone in foundations postdating Legio X Gemina's departure. Therefore, the occurrence of legionary roof tiles, Grauwacke, tuff and Norroy limestone in public buildings of the early second century is strong evidence that army personnel had a role in civil construction during the same period. Domestic Cattle and Economic Change in the Roman Period Lower Rhineland: The Civitas Batavorum The discovery of Legio XX stamped tiles referring to Viducius at a rural tile-works in Merseyside confirms him as a legionary contractor; close examination of tile sizes shows that contractors appear to have played a significant part in the production for at least two of the legions. Legionary Tile Production in Britain | Britannia | Cambridge Core The city of Timgad (Algeria) was supposedly mainly built by the army:
    1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. Look, I know that there are lots of Elon haters and lots of ludites, but this is something that even those with the smoothest brains should try to understand. There is Tesla, and there is all the other "also rans". Tesla is the only EV OEM that is making a profit and they have been making such a good profit per unit that they are able to reduce their prices to levels that no other company that makes an acceptable EV can even dream of. That is Tesla's plan. It has always been it's plan. What is the best selling model car (both EV and ICE) in the world? -- Tesla model Y. What is the best selling EV in China? -- Tesla model Y. What is the best selling EV in Europe? Tesla model Y. What is the best selling car of any kind in California? -- Tesla model Y. What is the safes car in a collision? -- Tesla. What car brand has the highest level of owner satisfaction? -- Tesla. What car brand has the highest owner loyalty? Tesla. What car sold in America has the most American content and labor? -- Tesla. What company has the most millionaires working on the assembly lines due to stock options? -- Tesla. There is such a divergence between Tesla and everyone else that most of them are just giving up and trying desperately to get people to believe that it is because EVs are not viable. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you buy anything but a Tesla anywhere in the world it can only be out of ignorance. Companies that were losing 40-200k on every EV they sold (most of them even BYD had to cook the books to show a profit and they are the only other one in the money on each sale, or so they say) cannot afford to lose even more by reducing their prices to give the appearance that they are competitive with Tesla even thought under the hood they are twenty years and two generations of tech behind and will never catch up because Tesla innovates much faster. When Toyota purchased and tore down a model Y they themselves said it was "a masterpiece of engineering" that they were not capable of duplicating. But they are trying to. Toyota is adopting Tesla's manufacturing tech as fast as it can, but they are trying, with no success, but much fantasy used as a delaying tactic. And what will all of Peter's quite dubious conclusions mean when a Tesla robotaxi appears and suddenly an EV is getting 500% more usage than a ICE car? The more you look into the actual facts, the more you will see that the future belongs to Tesla in a big way. And you naysayers will be just as happy as the rest of us when you finally wake up.
    1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. Paradox? Irony? Oxymornical juxtaposition? First the report on the anti-immigrant white supremacy movement, then the anti-gun plug, then the reports of corruption so rampant in Mexico that journalist (and many others) are assassinated by government officials who are really working for drug dealers. Well if you don't see the cognitive dissonance, just let me ask. What is the difference between the USA and Mexico? Why is it that before the recent mass murder in El Paso (by a non-resident) that El Paso was (and probably still is) one of the safest US cities, and right across the boarder on the other side of the same accumulation of humans, is Juarez: one of the most dangerous cities on earth?  I am not offering any answers here only questions. What is the difference between the USA and Mexico? Our corrupt oligarch, power elite, and robber barons, need to be more circumspect. They can't just kill someone for personal reasons -- not to say this has never happened, but it is not nearly as common. I will submit one answer for your approval. If all drugs were to be decriminalized in the USA, and treated as the medical and psychological problems that they are (for some), and perhaps even establish sanctuary zones, where people could do all the drugs they want and buy them from drug stores over the counter. Don't you think that that would put the end to the billions of dollars that end up in criminal hands and corrupt everything from our own federal agencies and military, to the banking system, to small town cops, down and out tradesmen, etc, etc, and it's all just puritanical nonsense. I know, it's hard to think outside the box when thinking is the box, but give it a try.
    1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. I can imagine an alternative that is outside of the usual: capitalism, communism, socialism, anarchism ruts. OK well anarchism may not be a rut, and in a sense it is almost as if an underlying subtle substrate of anarchism may be both present and necessary for the vitality of the other isms, but it seems to me that a purely anarchist state, or region, if you prefer, would be at the mercy of nations that are otherwisely organized. First of all, I mention in the spirit of full disclosure that I find government and it's mechanics boring, and somehow grey and depressing, and consider the people who have a desire to acquire temporal power over the physical existence of others as sick, deeply self-deluded individuals. I think that in general our leaders, in whatever flavor basically suck ass when it comes to administering a government. We are told that governments are the most dangerous entities on earth, not to other governments or other peoples, but to their own people. But of course it is not governments, no matter the formal codification of society in the form of laws and regulations, but the people who enact same, supposedly for the benefit of society, but more realistically in the service of their own organically pragmatic predilections, whether apparent as in the case of libertarians, and various utilitarian movements, or subtle and convoluted and perhaps even unconscious as on the part of various idealists, and utopians. Anyway, enough of this and to the point. I suggest a governing system in which the body of government employees, whether a janitor or the chief executive, is chosen by testing and continual performance review. Sort of a Techno-Neo Confucianism where anyone who is able to score higher on a series of tests that are generated by machine learning logarithms to optimize a governing system that is entirely relative to an established constitution or declaration of stated national goals, such as the optimal health wealth and well-being of all citizens or the earliest possible establishment of an extra-planetary colony that is self-sustaining, or some other orientation or constellation of orientations that is established by and modified by the adult populace with varying degrees of voting powers, which degree would also be determines by a test designed to test the intelligence, knowledge and correlation to reality of their internal conceptions. They would be voting directly only for the goals and general prime directives of the nation and not the leaders or manner in which these goals are pursued except in so far as they have established restrictions on such pursuits, such as environmental regulations and standards of dignity and freedom regarding all individuals. New and future technology will allow earthlings to establish a society that is superior to any that humans themselves are capable of designing the social and physical dynamics and details of. Thusly the human race will expand into the limitless resources of the solar system and beyond, to evolve in concert with our technology to a destiny which is presently beyond the capacity of even the most creative futurist to imagine. In such a system, the tests for positions of higher responsibility would be complex and not limited to written exams, but would include virtual reality scenarios, real world assessment and performance review, as well as extreme depth of psychological testing. I might add that in regard to such "higher" positions it may well be determined and required that it would be necessary for them to experience a mental state of awareness that is beyond the consensus thought-centric and quite mechanical mental processes of humanity, whether by psychedelic agents or some other mode of transcendence. In addendum: democracies do work, I should say "can work", this is illustrated by the fact that if a problem is too complex, such as guessing the number of jellybeans in a huge urn. If enough people guess, say tens of thousands, the median of all the guesses is always more accurate than any single guess. Ok theoretically a single guess can be just as or more accurate than the median of all guesses, but not very friggen often and it is just luck. Now if you have some agency that obscures the urn or finds a means of exaggerating certain qualities or merely using persuasion to misrepresent the number of jelly beans this will obviously fuck things up. This is analogous to the present state of the world with regard to the disinformation and propaganda generated by all manner of sources like Fox News, or any news outside of peer reviewed journals and even then. . . . So of course in this society, as it should be in ours, the penalty for knowingly reporting inaccurate information as fact would be death. No excuses.
    1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. Old subject lots of comments. Here's my two cents for posterity (because I doubt if any humans will read it. It being a 2 years old question). Ok, this is not one subject but several. I will only talk about entering a corner, with no traffic in front of you and little concern for pedestrians or police. Also you are not on a race track, but having a spirited drive alone on an appropriate road, like in the coastal range in Kali or the Appalachians on a two lane black top, something like that. This is how I "engine brake" in that sort of situation, and it has served me well for over fifty years of using the public highways as my own personal billions dollar amusement ride. In the appropriate situations of course. This is done in one very quick smooth action. I depress the clutch and put the gear shift in neutral. I sharply blip the throttle and as the engine is coming back down from the peak of the rev, I downshift when the revs match the gear. That is, there is no clutch feel at all of the engine catching up to the gear speed or visa versa. They just match, no slipping at all. If you have never gotten effective with this technique it can probably be done much faster and smoother than you imagine. This affords an initial state where in nether the clutch nor the gear box is strained but rather have almost retained a constant state of equilibrium, except of course that I am now in a lower gear that is engine breaking at a higher rate. It is also handy for exiting the turn under power. I have always called this double-clutching. In my old Willys Jeep it was the only way you could shift without grinding, and in my more sporting cars it seems fun and effective and definitely preserves the synchronizers from explosion. Not for everyone I suspect, but I usually bother to double-clutch when driving attentively and the curves are sharp enough to inspire down-shifting. On the other subject he mentioned, that is, long grades: If alone in the mountains, which is a frequent situation. I like to crest the mountain slow enough and combine that with a gear that will allow me to not use my brakes at all. I usually do this in neutral and just ride my kinetic wave, unless the grade is so long that I will enter any curves on the downside at a speed that would necessitate braking, then I use a gear and usually put it in neutral part way down the mountain in order not to waste all the energy I put into climbing the hill. This has become a real tactical game with me. How can I roll down the mountain most efficiently, energy-wise, without taking the curves so fast that I have to use any braking, engine or wheel.
    1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761.  @platosbeard4449  Can you tell me of a hegemony or even nation of secondary power that has not also expressed the human failings common to all men of whatever race or creed? That is of course: had they the power that results in notable corruption. I frequent many progressive forums and the people I run into who consider themselves progressives, are frequently surprised to the point of denial to find out that the American First Nations or Native Americans were not only not the environmentalists that is held forth in their pop persona in the media, but were hideously barbaric and blood thirsty in their near continuous warfare among themselves in pre and post columbian eras. Further when it is pointed out to them that such behavior is common to all the vying nations and even some NGO and religious organizations, inevitably they have to divert the conversation. To ascribe the common failings of all men to the current hegemony, though always a crowd pleaser among those outside of said hegemony, or out of power inside of it, is simplistic and naive. Which is not to say that the USA is not deserving of such criticism. The USA is apparently corrupt on many national levels, but what nation is not? True, the corruption in the USA presently has more of a universal effect than say the corruption you may find in a monastery in Tibet, but do you doubt that the young initiates in such a circumstance are exploited, beaten, and abused, even in this apparently most benign of cultures? The USA could do well to have a government upgrade, no doubt, something that excluded psychopaths, or people who are unable to distinguish fact from fiction, from public office would be good for a start. But barring that, real campaign finance reform is the lynch pin that will end the normalized corruption that holds America in its thrall, and is the most beneficial legislation that could occur. All other political issues in the USA are basically red herrings that keep the same old power-elite bumbling along.
    1
  2762.  @stansukhwant-ms8bz  Really? What is the source of your information. I ask because as I see it Wall Street owned both of them, but Trump was too out front about the undermining of the middle class that they have been doing for fifty years. It was embarrassing. The largest transfer of wealth from everybody to the one percent took place under Trump. Look it up. All the millionaires got permanent tax breaks, while the rest of us got temporary tax breaks. The biggest financial bubble of stock values took place under Trump. Also he ran up the national deficit farther and faster than any other president in history. Cutting taxes and increasing military spending will do that. You may not remember it but when Clinton left office the nation had no deficit at all, in fact it had a surplus. The idiot Bush took care of that by invading a country for 9/11 that had nothing to do with 9/11. I could go on forever. The main point to remember is this. The real money behind Trump is Robert Mercer, who is the most successful hedge fund manager in the world and owns the largest house and compound on long Island, and Koch Industries which are the worst polluters in the USA. They are as Wall Street as you can get, and even the traders and banksters were ecstatic when Trump won, because they knew a fellow confidence artist when they met one. You may remember that Trump lost in NY and lost big in NYC. That is simply because they were aware of what a disaster and con artist he was, and the small town rubes in the rust belt that put him in office had no idea what he really was outside of the illusion he spun on TV of being a great businessman. While the reality is that he lost more money than anyone else in the country for ten years strait. Unfortunately his enablers depended on lies instead of facts and he supplied them in spades. Trump told over 22,000 documented lies since he took office and hasn't let up for one minute. Here's the most important fact. Both the republican and the democratic parties are virtually owned by the same few families and they have nothing good in store for you and me.
    1
  2763.  @ssn90  To me it is totally frightening that so many otherwise apparently normal and even good people have fallen for his authoritarian bull. But even someone with virtually no political smarts, if exposed to the actual facts should be able to come to a conclusion that is not against their own best interests. The main problem is, as you mentioned the amount of disinformation that is served up to the public as factual. Even if the facts are correct, the entire milieu of their narrative is often diversionary and false. But look at this fact: The biggest polluter in the country is Koch Industries. Since the right-wing radicals under Trump took over, they no longer have to follow EPA guidelines at all regarding what they dump into the water table and our streams and rivers. Have you ever visited the Appalachian coal regions, especially in PA. Streams with no life at all, forests that grow to forty feet then all die because their roots hit poisoned water, roads so thick with coal dust from trucks that every car that passes raises a toxic black cloud. Community after community devastated by pollution and economic collapse, yet they go on stripping, go on burning the crap for electricity, and there are no miners at all anymore, none that go down into mines that is. The people that own these big mines do not live there. They wouldn't live there is you paid them. Trump lied about clean coal. The entire idea of clean coal is ridiculous yet these devastated communities are some of the most staunch and violent Trump supporters anywhere. It leads one to conclude that the vast majority of Trump supporters cannot tell reality from the disinformation planted in their heads, and the disinformation coming from a source like PBS and a Trump rally are not even in the same universe. Trump is a lying, thieving, draft-dodging, mental defective. That is apparent to anyone who just looks at the real facts and ignores the hype.
    1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767.  @richardowens9061  Have you been asleep? The evidence is massive if you care to look for it. Let’s start with the law that congress just passed allowing government agencies to investigate your internet activities. But this is just window dressing for something that has been going on for over a decade. Former head of the NSA Clapper’s problematic testimony occurred a few minutes before noon on March 12, 2013, when he told Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., “No, sir,” and, “Not wittingly,” in response to a question about whether the NSA was collecting “any type of data at all” on millions of Americans. Wyden later said he provided the question to Clapper before the hearing and unsuccessfully asked Clapper to correct the record. Months later, Snowden revealed in June 2013 that the U.S. intelligence community obtained secret court orders forcing phone companies to turn over millions of U.S. call records on an “ongoing, daily basis.” And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Everything you do, write or say over the internet or other electronic venues is not only analyzed, it is stored for over a decade. This has been known for years. Try a little investigation yourself. Snowden let the cat out of the bag, and later revelations show that not only was he telling the truth but he didn’t really know all of the features of the domestic spying. You are probably also unaware that drones monitor some ot the cities in the USA continually. They have been used to monitor the current protests and the scumbags who use them to cover criminal activities. Some of these drone services are even run by private companies and sold to police departments. They are quite simple and brilliant – as in brilliant weaponry which is the next step beyond smart weapons. The same type of logarithms that show you ads based on your internet use are used to sum up and infer your propensity for anti-government activities. Don’t be naive. Think about it. A drone is continuous overhead during the protests. Every heat signature on the street is tagged. Then they can merely rewind the surveillance video and see where any particular tagged heat signature originated, thus getting the address. Also where they went after the demonstration. Etc. Another example: There is a burglary. They play the video backward and can tell where the criminals came from, simple but extremely effective. I don’t really have time to do your homework for you so if you can actually discriminate between evidence and disinformation you will find innumerable leads to what is going on. And every one of your searches will be recorded and scrutinized by machines that can do that and a thousand times more in a fraction of a second at almost no cost.
    1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783.  @moritamikamikara3879  No dude, the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. GM did recent buybacks for exactly the reason you give. Tesla never did any buybacks. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. Personally I am of the opinion that the people who are more or less forcing the traditional automakers to go EV and are developing the physical potential of green energy, have done far more than all the environmental protestors put together. Actually doing something viable and positive that is physically transformative . . . not so easy as talk. Like Sting sang, "There is no political solution. . . ." Any so-called political solution will be co-opted, lobbied and well "corrupted" into ineffectual window dressing that is really only a path to political power for those of the same bent as those they criticize but in a different "key, like in the progressive key instead of the regressive one we now tolerate to an amazing degree: like frogs in a slowly warming pot that will eventually boil. The solution is to make the most gross sources of environmental degradation economically nonviable (and this is being done quite rapidly, though certainly not as rapidly as it would be if the current pending legislation were objective and not just a political ploy to subsidize unions and other political entities instead of the most viable engineering of the desired clean energy transformation) -- or we can continue, to do the same thing over and over, while expecting a new outcome. I have to quote whoever it was who said, "The lesson of history is that humanity does not learn from the lessons of history." . . . or something to that effect. We could, but this can only come about after a total reform of how political campaigns are financed. We can only really begin to proceed if all private funding of politics is disallowed by law. I know this, you know this, even John McKane knew this and still crickets. I know it's boring but campaign finance is the lynch pin of all the presently legalized forms of corruption that have been normalized in the last half century. It is the glue that holds together the nasty melange we presently suffer.
    1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. Tesla seems to be doing more than fine in their China giga. Sales are up domestically and internationally from there, they are about to release the Highland model from China, and they have been seeking approval for a major expansion of manufacturing facilities. CATL has built a new battery plant right next to Tesla giga Shanghai, (wonder why). Though to be fair Tesla has also been initiating new Tera plants like crazy, the one in Monterrey Mexico will be twice a big as the biggest factory in the USA (Tesla giga Austin) and there are ongoing negotiations with, Canada, Spain, India, Indonesia, and probably places I don't know about to build additional plants. Tesla is also the only American company operating in China that has been allowed total ownership of it's operations, at least until a few months ago when it seems other companies have been cut a similar deal. Yep, guess that green tech will never work out. . . . But now it can't help but work out, Tesla cars are now less expensive to buy than comparable gas cars, and much much less expensive to own and operate. This despite the Musk haters and gobblers of the lies instigated by short sellers, OEM ICE investors and tier 1-3 suppliers, the oil shitheads, union shills, the mass media trying to shake T down for ad revenue and the general knuckle-dragging troglodytes that drive dualy diesel pickups and put something in the bed from Home Depot once or twice a year, while they pollute the air we breath with toxic carcinogenic fumes which are responsible for millions of repertory related deaths each year and drag a useless ton of iron around with them everywhere they go because they want to pretend to be cowboys or good old boys or some other stupid shit.
    1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889.  @disrealnow9664  And China is pretty much doing the same thing to Russia that Russia did to Ukraine before the actual shooting began. Little groups of a hundred thousand or so are sneaking into Russia. The problem is that the future for both China and Russia is dismal to say the least. As Russia is forced to shut down it's pipelines in order to prevent their self destruction when the west refuses to further fund their war though fuel payments, it is expected to take a minimum of ten years to get them up again. But that would be with the help of western experts and corporate interests that have fled Russia. There is no practical way for China to import Russian oil, they are dependent on the middle east and the navigational choke points that are held by various states that are not at all friendly toward them. And of course both China and Russia are on the verge of an unrecoverable population implosion. As well as given the opportunity any Russian with talent or expertise flees Russia. Then there is the matter of the ramjet guided artillary shells that are or have been (no one really knows) By Nammo in Norway, which is about to become a NATO member. This and another analogous effort by Raytheon should be able to out distance similar Russian guided rounds by 20 or so miles. And of course Canada just gave Excalibur rocket propelled guided rounds and the mobile artillary that can fire them to Ukraine. This is itself will be a game changer in coordination with the "Ghost Phoenix" drones the USA is supplying. These shells do not quite have the range of similar Russian rocket propelled guided shells, but are deadly accurate, and have been used successfully by the USA in conflicts world wide.
    1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923.  @myhhlim  And your "facts" are mere CCP party line propaganda. What happened to whom you describe as the "red Indians" happened all over the world to the primitive inhabitants of the earth when confronted with the technologies that radiated from the first civilizations. It happened to the first Europeans themselves and the second and the Neanderthals before them. This is the nature of life, you can see it in fungus, plants, and all species of animals. The invasive species whom you refer to as the "red Indians" but who were really different incursions of Siberians into an environment, that, coincidentally underwent a massive extinction of species upon their dissemination into the Americas -- these now cosmic environmentalists, were displaced and disrupted by further invasions of native Asians as evidenced in the archeological record. Who, by the way, practiced all manner of inhumane hideous warfare upon one another continually, and took every advantage they could find to dominate, enslave, and destroy other, "red Indians" as evidenced by the expansion of the Comanche Empire upon their development of mounted warfare. As has been natural for all human beings everywhere until modern times. Now, in the eyes of puddin' heads like you, they were nothing but victims of an insanely rapacious and wholly corrupt European invasion. Yet you use an ancient dynasty to justify the invasion of a peaceful nation that wanted nothing to do with China or it's political ideology. This is the same as me claiming that all of Turkey, ,postl of Northern Africa, most of Central Asia and even a little bit of India is really Greek because it was once a part of Alexander's conquest. Grow a brain and step outside of your partisan fantasy of a worldview. Humans are flawed, all humans, susceptible to corruption beyond the common conscience of -- not doing to others what you would not want them do to one's self. It is a rare person who is not corrupted by power, all governments are an enriched culture for corruption, China is no different. China now has a dictator for life with almost unchallengable power, and total power corrupts totally, he is no exception. He has a narrow window in which to act because of China's demographic timebomb and it seems He is willing to advance aggressively as much as is convenient and possible, just like the USA did during the days of "Manifest Destiny" Before the Japanese invaded Manchuria and lite off WW2 they also felt the pressure of having a limited time to act in which to establish their empire. We know what that came to.
    1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929.  @oonie1576  The Chinese government does not provide basic needs to the populace. In fact if you dismiss the propaganda, the USA is actually more socialist than China. China has nothing like Medicare or Social Security benefits. You are obviously a dupe of some kind of propaganda. And though China has the second biggest economy, the personal income of the average person is abysmal. Their is not even a fair comparison between the poor in China and the homeless in the USA. Many if not most of the homeless in the USA are eligible for housing and other benefits but choose not to participate. The news media and all media in the USA is open to all reports and opinions, China has to control all information or the people would raise up and get rid of the CCP if they knew the truth about what is going on. It comes down to this: the old truth that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. In China you have a dictator for life. Nothing more need be said. He is entirely corrupt. People are not even allowed to say he looks like Pooh Bear. But you are right it should be up to the Chinese what they want to put up with. And it should be up to the people in HK what government they want, and the people in Taiwan what government they want, and the people in Tibet what government they want, but it isn't. Because China is authoritarian and expansionist and doesn't give a damn what the people want. When given the choice to be free or a part of China no one has yet freely chosen to be part of China. And don't pretend that you live in China, if you did you couldn't even see YouTube unless you were breaking the law, or some kind of paid dupe for the party.
    1
  2930. News flash: CNN, MSNBC, and the usual suspects report:. . . In the primary race between Sanders and Buttigieg, Pete came in second over all, while Sanders came in next to last. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Real democracy, true democracy exists nowhere on earth other than present day Switzerland and never has (that I am aware of). Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. And you CNN, are a big part of it. In fact people will come to recognize that you are a key member of the new axis of evil. FaceBook -- Buttigieg -- CNN
    1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. News flash: CNN, MSNBC, and the usual suspects report:. . . In the primary race between Sanders and Buttigieg, Pete came in second over all, while Sanders came in next to last. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Real democracy, true democracy exists nowhere on earth other than present day Switzerland and never has (that I am aware of). Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. the new axis of evil. FaceBook -- Buttigieg -- CNN
    1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. China is pretty much doing the same thing to Russia that Russia did to Ukraine before the actual shooting began. Little groups of a hundred thousand or so are sneaking into Russia. The problem is that the future for both China and Russia is dismal to say the least. As Russia is forced to shut down it's pipelines in order to prevent their self-destruction when the west refuses to further fund their war though fuel payments, it is expected to take a minimum of ten years to get them up again. But that would be with the help of western experts and corporate interests that have fled Russia. There is no practical way for China to import Russian oil, they are dependent on the middle east and the navigational choke points that are held by various states that are not at all friendly toward them. And of course both China and Russia are on the verge of an unrecoverable population implosion. As well as, given the fact that, given the opportunity any Russian with talent or expertise flees Russia. Then there is the matter of the ramjet guided artillery shells that are or have been (no one really knows) developed by Nammo in Norway, which is about to become a NATO member. This and another analogous effort by Raytheon should be able to out distance similar Russian guided rounds by 20 or so miles. And of course Canada just gave Excalibur rocket propelled guided rounds and the mobile artillery that can fire them to Ukraine. This in itself will be a game changer in coordination with the "Ghost Phoenix" drones the USA is supplying. These shells do not quite have the range of similar Russian rocket propelled guided shells, but are deadly accurate, and have been used successfully by the USA in conflicts world wide.
    1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. Here's the news: A compulsive liar has been lying, and the people who report about the compulsive liar are shameless, and apparently brainless rumor mongers trying to gain ratings to increase the profit they make selling commercial time. Both the compulsive liar, the networks, cable networks, and popular mass media are almost entirely owned by the same people who own the various politicians (including Trump). They present an apparent adversarial relationship to the clueless public who is continually brainwashed by their spin and lies 24/7. This fake dichotomy: liberal/conservative, pro-trump/anti-trump, religious/pragmatic, up/down, right/wrong, true/false is continually infused into the collective awareness, in order to keep them divided and in conflict, so that a hand full of megalomaniac auto-compulsive psychopaths and their deviant sycophant enablers (including police and military that are willing to violate the rights of private citizens) can maintain the stranglehold they have over the wealth and destiny of humanity. And you all fall for it continually -- continually. . . . even the smart ass critics among you are deluded by the human nervous systems natural tendency to divide everything into two opposing vectors, simply because the nervous system itself operates on opposing charges we have designated as positive and negative in the ionic sphere. The reality is that almost no one has anything outside of the magic circle of these dichotomies to say. Not that I expect anything objective (outside of the scientific disciplines and even that is stretching it) out of humanity at this point, but you should at least know were you stand, if you are capable of that. You stand firmly on the shores of delusions made real by acts they inspire.
    1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. he USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narratives that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues. You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. Reality Check for knee-jerk-liberals: Democratic New York Sen. Chuck Schumer announced plans Sunday to introduce a bill requiring the FBI to approve body armor sales to civilians. The legislation would mandate FBI approval for civilians to purchase body armor Every time issues like this are raised the firearms manufacturers, and in this case body-armor manufacturers experience a windfall of profits and sell all their stock. People who would never have bought a semi-automatic firearm have bought them by the millions as a reaction to the threat of a ban. People who would never have purchased body-armor are now lined up and back-ordering armor: people who never would have thought about it before Shumer's move. Big money is made every time that such legislation is even mentioned. Let's hope the investigators in the Securities and Exchange Commissions have adequate funding. Speaking of stock: In 2012, members of Congress passed the STOCK Act, a bill meant to curb insider trading for lawmakers and their staff. Then when the Securities and Exchange Commission made news with the first major investigation of political insider trading, Congress moved to block the inquiry. But really, should your child have to ask the FBI if she can carry a back-pack that would afford her a prayer of survival if she is caught up in a random act of gun violence? Like those that incorporate a light-weight ballistic panel? The police have armor penetrating ammunition for situations involving armored gunmen. Civilians cannot legally possess such ammunition. The idea that the public will be safer if their ability to protect themselves and loved ones is diminished is ridiculous. It's funny how frequently the public is the victim of irony that proceed from the political sphere of power. Governments are simultaneously the most beneficent and deadly spawn that the human intellect has contrived.
    1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. The biggest single factor in climate change is the generation of greenhouse gases. Far more greenhouse gases are produced by animal agriculture than any other source (87% by animal ag as compared to 13% by all other sources: cars, planes, electric plants, etc.: combined) The focus on burning fossil fuels is important, but diversionary. Animal agriculture is the elephant shi$$ing in the room, and it includes the massive burning of fossil fuels in it's production and transport technologies. The most important thing a person can do to address climate change, as an individual, is to stop buying the products of animal agriculture, such as meat, dairy products (no Ben and Jerry's does not get a pass) leather goods, and furs. If enough people do this, we will survive, if not, our grandchildren will be forced to decide if they should eat their babies in the hope of surviving a few more weeks when crops fail globally. That's the choice: do we indulge our blind instinctive desires and rationalize them with self-centered reactive opinions, or do we leave future generations a planet worth living on? Or do we just go on fruitlessly bitching about the injustice of things, and put off acting until it's beyond too late. My personal bet is that the vast majority of us, even if convinced of the dire reality of the global climate situation, will go on with our rapacious lifestyles unabated. Even so, those are the facts. Now -- are we rational moral beings, or just mad machines that really have no control over ourselves?
    1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. No dude, the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. Stupid comment of the day award! Why is this a stupid comment? There is absolutely no evidence that the US government smuggled heroin out of Afganistan. But that is just a minor point. More important is the fact that the heroin that was produced in Afghanistan went to Iran, and Europe via traditional means. Though the US government attack on Al-Qaeda was temporarily supported by the Northern Alliance, which was largely heroin smugglers, and the US armed forces apparently did nothing to suppress opium production in Afghanistan, it did not in anyway facilitate the transport and smuggling of heroin, like it is rumored to have done out of the the Golden Triangle during the Vietnam conflict. Also of note is the fact that the international banks that have been washing the ill-gotten gains of drug cartels is not in the least dependent upon heroin smuggling to supply them with billions of dollars to wash. Why would anyone go through the trouble of growing fields of poppies, the incredibility labor intensive practice of collecting the poppy latex, processing it into opium, converting the opium into morphine base, and finally processing the morphine base into heroin, all in clandestine labs and fields, then smuggling it across multiple boarders and making all the payoff along the way, when they could just order the precursors for fentnyl legally from China, synthesize a few grams in Mexico and have enough "heroin" to supply their entire US distribution network for a week? Huh? Why? This is why: because either you care nothing about the actual facts of what is going on, and just want to present an anti-USA narrative, or your are living in the sixties, when poppy fields still mattered.
    1
  3032.  @nutcheck3  The photos you saw were not of troops guarding poppy fields, they were told not to interfere or destroy crops back when those photos were taken. They just happened to be standing in a poppy fields for a photo op. Hey mom look, here I am standing in an opium poppy field. The Northern Alliance controlled the poppy production in Afghanistan. So since they basically kicked Al Quada out of Afghanistan we did not destroy their fields. There is some evidence that opioids wee smuggled out of the golden triangle during the Vietnam War. Not as a part of any policy, but like the crack epidemic, by CIA operatives that didn't acknowledge any legal restraints on their activities. So maybe some CIA contractors smuggled some drugs out of Asia, and certainly CIA operatives were involved in supporting the Contras with money they made smuggling cocaine into the states, but the US government is not smuggling heroin anywhere, that is just a myth many people would like to believe. Believe me, if the US government wanted to deal opioids in the US, they would just synthesis it in labs already in the country, or better yet in Mexico, they would not smuggle it out of Afghanistan. You can not only synthesis it thousands of times cheaper than growing poppies and refining them to opium>morphine base> heroin> pure heroin, but you can actually use genetically modified yeast to just piss opioids like brewers yeast does alcohol. On the other hand although the US has spent billions of dollars trying to halt poppy production in Afghanistan and bombed over 2000 targets that supposedly served as production and distribution centers, they were largely impotent at curtailing or even suppressing the poppy production. Almost all of which goes to Iran and Europe. The interesting (and real) question at this point is not whether or not the US government smuggles heroin (they don't) it is: will the Taliban, which formerly ended the entire opioid business in Afghanistan last time they ruled the country, now that they have been profiting from heroin production as an income source while they were out of power, reinstate their zero tolerance policy toward drugs? One thing we know for sure is that it will be much harder for the Taliban to ban drugs now that it is their business.
    1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narrative that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues including this one (though not quite as bad as most). You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and performance in virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. That would help a great deal, but , the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. That was then, this is now. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. There are no indigenous people in the Americas, nor in Europe, Asia, Australia, nor any longer in Africa. All humans found outside of certain river valleys in Africa are an invasive species and due to migration, displacement, and climate changes, even present day humans to be found in these regions are not indigenous. What you refer to as indigenous peoples are merely a technologically unsophisticated invasive species. Your continual failure to admit the truth regarding human populations is just more spin. And your news, though better than the cable channels, is saturated with spin, and impoverished as far as hard facts about such matters are concerned. Democracy Now's narrative never recognizes or mention the fact that the peoples they refer to as ingenious were, in precolumbian times, continually at war with each other. And their methods were totally politically incorrect and brutal. So brutal that the entire idea of surrendering to a victor was not even considered an option. Nobody seemed to want to be tortured as public entertainment for days on end, and handed over to the women and children to have sport with the last of you. If one was lucky they didn't eat you. Of course now, they are peaceful environmentalists. Right -- They were such great environmentalist that one of the major extinction events just happened to coincide with their penetration of and propagation through out the Americas. Just like everywhere else on earth: in the Americas humans appeared, and the indigenous fauna crashed. Gone also are the early European horse tribes. So gone: that they are generally not even known. What really makes me laugh is the way that self-proclaimed sophisticated intellectuals, take claims of sacred mountains and special sacred lands seriously. Either you see the Buddha in a stick of dung (which is to say that everything is sacred if you are) or your are just spinning bullshit. And the narrative that Democracy Now spins about these remnants of stone age tribes is pure bullshit, probably derived from Hollywood's revisionist romantic fantasies about them that began appearing in the seventies. I would recommend Empire of the Summer Moon as an informative and engaging peek into the horribly brutal reality of the behavior exhibited by these tribes toward each other and the newer invaders from Europe. Give up your puddin' headed notions: born out of your own yearning for a more authentic existence in the face of the omnipresent media mind-fuck you live in. 1
    1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. Prediction: We will figure out exactly how they cheated, then we will figure out the next way that they cheated, and the one after that, and so on: with a factual and rational narrative about the qualities of people who would do such things. We will even say, "They said it couldn't happen here.": out of ironic gallows humor. Maybe at times their cheating will be so outrageous that hundreds of thousand of people will march or occupy something, but amazingly, almost miraculously Mitch and Lindsey, and the rest of Caligula JR's little unholy Greek chorus will retain their offices, and they will go on cheating and bullying and claiming that the law is what ever they think it is at the moment. And we will figure it all out. And you will make it funny and entertaining. But now we have reached a point in politics where: as in the attempt to transcend one's own habitual mode of mental functioning: knowing doesn't matter. You may know that the associative functioning of the thought-centric mind is mechanical, but that doesn't transcend or transform anything. So it is with our political system. We have known forever that it would be best to get all money out of politics if the most ethical and fair government is what you want. We have known forever that proportional representation is superior to winner-takes-all seesaws. We have known that the banks are incapable of regulating themselves and that the wealth of the nation is being sucked up by the military industrial professional political worker complex, that the drug war is a farce that has created the first billionaire criminal organizations. In our hollowed out lives, news has become entertainment. And the fantasyland they present to the public is a poor substitute for what should have been the golden destiny of mankind on earth and in regions beyond.
    1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. It's not just the radical right that is systemically insane regarding climate change. The prime example is how the nitwit left is treating Tesla. All these protests and thousands of people have done nothing to address the problem compared to Tesla. They are all "bla bla bla" and Tesla actually walks the walk, and what does it get? Back of the line and not even recognized for its enormous and continuing contributions to greenhouse gas abatement. Foaming at the mouth woke puddin' heads who hate Tesla because Musk is rich and showing a way to a golden future for mankind. Ludites who understand nothing of Tesla's breakthroughs and continuing campaign to bring hope of a future worthy of humanity. The appointment of Tesla haters like Cummings to positions that control the industry. Just envious small minds who think that marching in favor of political solutions is an effective action: political solutions that will never take place because the people who created the problem are in control of establishing the perception of a working solution. We have been marching for environmental protection since the sixties and the result is NOTHING. A president who sucks up to unions shops no matter how hopelessly behind the tech that Tesla has developed, who supports FORD (who manufactures their EVs in Mexico (thus the recent modification to the rebates that disregards where they are built, instead of Tesla, which builds cars with the most American parts and labor of ALL vehicles, and a gov. who fails to even recognize the real progress they have made. This last election is the first and last time I vote for a lesser of two evils, the democrats and republicans are both corrupt beyond reform, and need to put a gun in their collective mouths and pull the trigger so the rest of us can return to sanity.
    1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. The Tesla model Y is the best selling car of any type in the world. It is the best selling car in Sweden too. The people who actually work for Tesla in Sweden want the unions to go away. Read the Swedish news. They know they will be better off without a union than with because the employee stock program will go away. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. The solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. In the sixties we saw that "There is no problem until there is trouble." The power elite and their misanthropic syncopates are not only out of touch, they are objectively insane in their behavior and the policies they establish. We thirst for justice, and after the possibility of a golden future for mankind. But they have no thirst for justice -- because -- they write the legislation, and it has become a legislation of privilege and legalized crimes, that is ultimately enforced by low level sell-outs and authoritarian types who have a taste for using the petty authority granted to them to push people around, lie in court and get away with murder. Or at the very least, stand with the blue mob's code of omerta.   Now people say, myself included, there are a lot of good cops. True that, but bad cops are just as common now, and the good cops ain't doin' shit about it. So functionally they are all pretty bad in total. I don't know about you, but I have never in my seventy years needed a cop for anything. I've reported thefts: nothing came of it. I have however gotten a few traffic tickets when I was young, for basically having a hot car and a pretty girl next to me. There was no need at all to break the law, they just were so full of hatred/envy -- Really. I was arrested for pot in college by an undercover scumbag that everyone knew was an undercover scumbag, who simply turned in drugs to a state narcotics officer and said I sold them to him. Like everyone else the scumbag did the same thing to, I was given the choice of pleading guilty and doing a few weeks in jail or facing over ten years in prison. I am not black, I was not poor, I didn't even have very long hair, which was a real reason for discrimination back then. When I was in high school I wore a black armband for the VietNam moratorium. I was told to leave school for the day. I went to a local dinner and a young off duty cop asked me why I wasn't in school. I told him and he threw me to the ground and started strangling me. Every cop I have ever seen testify in court, just out and out lied. They had it all written down, what didn't happen, with such impressive notes about times and what not I don't think that my experience is anomalous. I think it is pretty representative of most people. Now I just treat the police like they are all potentially violent insane people, who may or may not bite. Police in America is really, mostly an alternate venue of taxation. All most all of us would be better off without them. Doesn't it cost more to imprison a man than to give him an ivy league education? Innocent men in prison is money in the bank for these reptilian brained psychotics, we call our leaders, the politician, and our real leaders, the politicians' owners. The banksters, and the hidden money, the insiders, the power elite. They are pretty much assholes. But they control the men with the guns. But not all of them, thanks to the second amendment.
    1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265.  @danpham333  Back. It's a meaningless stat because you are comparing all business. So of course established companies that are large enough to be targeted by unions will average more than the conglomeration of business that are less profitable. Migrant workers, part time everything thrown into one. The problem with your reasoning is that Tesla is singular. I don't know where you live, but here in central PA anyone with no experience can walk into a plant and get a job of twenty plus dollars per hour. My cleaning lady makes $25 per hour -- no skills, no union, and $3 less than the average union autoworker salary and she has more work than she can take. Plus it's cash and the chances are minimal that she pays taxes on it and of course no dues. Take an autoworker who is ready to retire. Started work in the eighties. I am not going to do the math, but I guarantee you, if you took the money he spent on dues over thirty years and had invested it in a stock index he would be far better off financially. And then if they had taken their stock and sold it and bought TEsla five years ago, every dollar they invested would be worth $1,141. So if they invested a messily 1k they would be more than a millionare today. If they had invested all their union dues for thirty years they would have more then 12million dollars today. That is using $15/hr from beginning to end for thirty years and you know they would have made more than that. On the other hand the UAW considers their latest wins a victory. These companies that caved will all be gone within a decade. No more GM, or STelantis, Ford may survive, and possibly Toyota if they copy Tesla and purchase tech from them. GM will once again come begging for a gov bail out that once again they will not repay. Plus it is all irrelevant because no one will be doing unskilled manual labor, and possibly not legal work, or a hundred other jobs that AI and the inevitable humanoid robots will be performing vastly better. No labor in the future so unions will serve no practical purpose. Even now if you teach one Teslbot a skill all of them become just as accomplished as the one that was taught it. In the future this will mean tens of thousands of bots will be able to master tasks in no time, instead of months and years. Unions and guilds served their purpose but nothing can stop what is now happening.
    1
  3266.  @abasilumsmith91  Absolute nothing at all. And Tesla is attempting to make a secure and lavish life not just for it's employees but eventually for everybody. And that takes concentrated capital, vast amounts of it allocated in strategic industries both for the security of families and the race as a whole, That's what the whole independent off world colony thing is about. Musk knows he will be dead before it happens, but he is striving to secure it. These things are not a secret, it's all spelled out in Tesla's not so secret secret plan that was published years ago. If you are young enough you will live to see thousands of Tesla bots landing on Mars, perhaps with a few scientists and engineers, and building and infrastructure out of native materials that will provide the seed for a real self-sustaining colony. Then, asteroids, nuclear war, climate change may come, eventually some extinction event will happen, it has over and over. But now thanks to this much maligned revolutionary thinker, consciousness will survive, in an otherwise dark universe (as far as we know). So I guess that having a month or two vacation, or a two year maternity leave is nice, but so irrelevant in the big picture. And of course the other off shoot of the convergence of tech breakthroughs the world is now witnessing will be affluence for all, and most likely a health-span of a vigorous few centuries. So what is important, the vision and pursuit of human ascendancy and it's golden destiny among the stars or a six week long vacation like my French friend who washed windows got?
    1
  3267. 1
  3268.  @sk0pe  I read what you said about Tesla employee stock program not benefiting the lowest wage workers and I was interested so I looked up the facts, read the program details and found out the the actual truth regarding what you wrote. Here it is Elroy. The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. And example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On Feburary 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit it even though it is a FACT. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: You are a shilll spewing nonsense who believes the lies of commercial media.
    1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. News flash: CNN, MSNBC, and the usual suspects report:. . . In the primary race between Sanders and Buttigieg, Pete came in second over all, while Sanders came in next to last. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Real democracy, true democracy exists nowhere on earth other than present day Switzerland and never has (that I am aware of). Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. And you CNN, are a big part of it. In fact people will come to recognize that you are a key member of the new axis of evil. FaceBook -- Buttigieg -- CNN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfQ7Zo6m9yg
    1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278.  @Nine-Signs  Politics sucks ass. Isn't it apparent to everyone by now that our political system is an archaic artifact? An artifact based on humanities inability to escape it's bestial warlike nature . . . :campaigns, winner take all victories, leaders who neither lead (excepting the advancement of the concerns of their patrons) nor have the wisdom to make intelligent impartial decisions on the issues of the day. This political web of deceit is a self-perpetuating parasite that warps collective social culture and is itself continually warped due to shameful self-interested exploitation by those who control the economy through control of debt manipulation. Interests and principalities that spew false narratives which have contaminated every aspect of our expectations of daily life, and our future aspirations (or lack of them). I suggest to you that there are other alternatives. Far more efficient alternatives, that would benefit the whole of society and reduce the corruption that is not only a systemic disease of our political system, but is now the very sinew, marrow, and circulatory system, of a body politic that has done everything possible to free itself from both morality and justice: through legislative and legal complexities, technicality, outright lies, and all manner of fuckery. It is time to evolve folks. Like a cool pool on a hot day, once you take the plunge it's refreshing and rejuvenating, but before you take that plunge there is hesitation and a resistance to a state change. And we must change the state of our state unless we consider moving into the future by looking through a rear-view mirror and stepping on our own dicks every step of the way while perpetually bitiching about it to be some kind of desirable human prerogative. Because as it is, it will never be able to meet our real human needs or provide anything more than updated reruns of the same old conundrums. If human culture and civilization is to advance it must evolve to a higher state, a higher system of state, which will nurture higher states of mind in the populace, not continually drag it back by aggravating the primal survival instinct in a technological environment wherein this instinct is counterproductive on numerous levels. I suggest to you that a body politic based on a NeoConfusian Techno-Meritocracy would be so vastly superior for the state of the state, state of the economy, state of human advancement, and our collective state of mind, that any comparison to the present drunken-knife-fight-in-a-gilded-bordello that passes for our government would be comical.
    1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285.  @mydogsbutler  Well you have been the victim of misinformation: social security and medicare and medicade are off the table. It is not Musk's company, he only owns 13 percent of Tesla, most is owned by small retail investors that believe in the good that Tesla has done for humanity. Tesla could go bankrupt and Musk would still be the richest man in the world. Musk pays his taxes always and never complained or tried to cheat. You are like a rabid person who is drowning in hatred fueled by a totally biased media. What you don't understand is that almost all reporting about Tesla is BS: why? Because unlike Ford, GM, and the other OEMs Tesla does not pay billions of dollars a year to advertise their products. Last year GM spent over two billion dollars on ads. The mass media has been trying to shake Tesla down for that ad vig for years. The actual truth about Musk is that everything he does has one aim, and that is to insure the survival of mankind during the next inevitable extinction level event. While a billion people with ten dollars each may be able to buy a happy meal each, one man with ten billion dollars or more could actually allocated the resources necessary to give humanity a change at survival. Musk is into efficiency he has developed the most efficient production methods on earth. The government is rife with corruption, kickbacks, and graft, and he sees this as standing in the way of his ultimate goal, which is to insure human survival. Get a life you hate filled fool.
    1
  3286.  @mydogsbutler  Well you have been the victim of misinformation: social security and medicare and medicade are off the table. It is not Musk's company, he only owns 13 percent of Tesla, most is owned by small retail investors that believe in the good that Tesla has done for humanity. Tesla could go bankrupt and Musk would still be the richest man in the world. Musk pays his taxes always and never complained or tried to cheat. You are like a rabid person who is drowning in hatred fueled by a totally biased media. What you don't understand is that almost all reporting about Tesla is BS: why? Because unlike Ford, GM, and the other OEMs Tesla does not pay billions of dollars a year to advertise their products. Last year GM spent over two billion dollars on ads. The mass media has been trying to shake Tesla down for that ad vig for years. The actual truth about Musk is that everything he does has one aim, and that is to insure the survival of mankind during the next inevitable extinction level event. While a billion people with ten dollars each may be able to buy a happy meal each, one man with ten billion dollars or more could actually allocated the resources necessary to give humanity a change at survival. Musk is into efficiency he has developed the most efficient production methods on earth. The government is rife with corruption, kickbacks, and graft, and he sees this as standing in the way of his ultimate goal, which is to insure human survival. Get a life you hate filled fool.
    1
  3287.  @mydogsbutler  Well you have been the victim of misinformation: entitlements like social security and medicare and medicade are off the table. It is not Musk's company, he only owns 13 percent of Tesla, most is owned by small retail investors that believe in the good that Tesla has done for humanity. Tesla could go bankrupt and Musk would still be the richest man in the world. Musk pays his taxes always and never complained or tried to cheat. What you don't understand is that almost all reporting about Tesla is BS: why? Because unlike Ford, GM, and the other OEMs Tesla does not pay billions of dollars a year to advertise their products. Last year GM spent over two billion dollars on ads. The mass media has been trying to shake Tesla down for that ad vig for years. The actual truth about Musk is that everything he does has one aim, and that is to insure the survival of mankind during the next inevitable extinction level event. Perhaps you don't understand or care what inevitable means or why it is so, or why it could happen anytime? While ten billion people with ten dollars each may be able to buy a happy meal each, one man with a hundred billion dollars or more could actually allocated the resources necessary to give humanity a change at survival. Musk is into efficiency he has developed the most efficient production methods on earth. The government is rife with corruption, kickbacks, and graft, and he sees this as standing in the way of his ultimate goal, which is to insure human survival.
    1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. The emergent meta-functionality of democracy cannot manifest in a culture of lies and spin. Humans, like ants and other social creatures are capable of displaying emergent qualities. That is: as a group they are capable of functionality that is impossible on an individual level. This is not only a factor on the obvious level, such as ants display in finding the most efficient route to a food source or building a bridge of their own bodies to traverse some void that would stymie an individual ant, but it is also a factor when considering the determination of the most correct estimation or conclusion in a political sense, when a society is self-influenced through popular vote, or social pressures. An example of this would be a game of chance that is sometimes come upon at a county fair or other event. There could be a huge urn with an irregular shape (not a simple cylinder or similar) and it is filled with, let us say, jelly beans. You are given the opportunity to buy a "chance" to win a Corvette or if you correctly guess the number of jelly beans. . . . A near impossible problem, that one could only get right by gross estimation combined with dumb luck. With a large enough population of guesses the average of all the guesses will in almost every event be more accurate than the most accurate individual guess.l This could be thought of as the genius potential of democracy. The exception being: that one in a hundred event wherein someone guessed right just by luck. However if within the hundreds of thousands of jellybeans there was a void, such as could be caused by a number of hidden grapefruits or softballs, this emergent function of the an accurate average would no longer manifest, and instead we would get a very inaccurate estimation of the situation from the average. These grapefruits represent dis, or misinformation, or as is the case with political entities, outright lies or spin. And so the genius of the meta-funtionality potential of the democratic process is totally negated by "free speech" without regard to actual facts. Who should be the arbiter of what is factual and what isn't? Physical reality, not eyewitness reports, or any kind of disruptive self-promoting verbal vomit from politicians or political social entities. Even the ancient Greeks knew that the last people on earth that should be trusted with political power are those who actively seek it. It would be very beneficial and profitable if -- politically -- we were to enter an era of competency and merit, wherein everyone is given an equal opportunity to display acumen for positions of power through testing, which would include high pressure simulated scenarios, psychological profiling, general knowledge, and specific expertise. But instead it's politics as usual, Which is kind of sickening, and boring, trite, inept, a magnet for high functioning psychopaths, etc. etc. Makes old Three Stooges flicks look profound in comparison.
    1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322.  @dannywindham3295  If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3323. Well then you are "for" a lost cause, because people have always done drugs, especially caffeine and alcohol, and it is natural to do drugs, there is no part of human history wherein people haven't used drugs, even the most ancient Scythian sites have contained devices that were used to smoke pot. No dude, the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. No dude, the solution is to take the profit out of drugs, by decriminalizing them and making cocaine available to the fools who use it cheap. At one point when I was young I had a job doing fix-up and painting around the house of a retired general of the US armed forces. His wife had prescriptions for both cocaine and opium, legally as nose drops and paregoric. She had bottles of them in virtually every room of the house and she seemed to function quite normally. The whole illegal drugs thing is a scam, it is total bullshit, and the only solution that works is decriminalization and gov sponsored clinics where the drugs can be had and used safely like they have in Switzerland. Unless you want the drug barons and their banker launderers to continue to corrupt every facet of our Republic from Congress down to the beat cop level, and the incredibly ineffective enforcement apparatus which has proven that they can do nothing of significance regarding the problem except increase their own power and funding and shit on low level street level creeps. When you make something like pot or opium illegal you make it so profitable that it will be smuggled and sold successfully no matter what enforcement techniques you use. It is natural to use and want to use drugs, cocaine is like coffee, only actually less toxic than pure caffeine. The worst drug by far as far as health and society is concerned is alcohol. You could use medically pure opioids most of your life without serious consequences, not so with alcohol. The reason drugs are illegal is power and money is derived from their prohibition, but the lies have the public in fear and no one has the courage to stand up because the bastards that profit from the prohibition have everything by the balls.
    1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The Americdan Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to..
    1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. This is so lame, they will not touch the largest cause of climate change: animal agriculture. IF all the forests that were cut down to provide pasture land since 1800 were allowed to reforest we would have no climate change. Look at the middle east, huge tracts of wasteland, caused by ignorance and subsistence grazing of sheep and goats since way before 1800. Yet it has been proven over and over, that if you stop the grazing, and reintroduce native grasses, IN A MATTER OF YEARS, fresh water springs will appear because the aquifers have refilled, because the grasses allow the natural water and moisture to penetrate the soil and not just run off. Then in a little longer forests will start to grow. This will work in land that is currently totally barren. Yet this is never, ever addressed by politicians because of the money from the meat and dairy industry. Heat pumps, induction stoves, etc. are these people morons? 86% of the greenhouse gases are produced by animal agriculture, not to mention the fact that it has also been proven over and over by real science (that science not underwritten by the meat and dairy industry) that the meat and dairy you eat is killing you. The WHO has classified processed meat products as class one carcinogens same as plutonium and cigarettes. You have been the victim of a relentless (not "unrelenting" as the people who say "wheelhouse" instead of "purview" would say, lol) disinformation campaign. Wake up and let the planet and yourself return to health. Their is so much disinformation on this matter, that if you find you way clear to a realistic narrative it is almost miraculous. And the effect on your health will indeed be miraculous.
    1
  3362. I like Niall, but claiming that democracy is the best we can do is not only incorrect, but alludes to a state of government that actually exists nowhere on earth. The first and most important thing to understand about democracy is that it capable of harnessing epigenetic suprahuman judgements and decisions that are totally beyond the abilities of any single human, no matter their intelligence or knowledge. Like ants who as individuals have no knowledge of how to build a bridge out of their bodies or choose the path that leads to just discovered food, yet as a group, are able to manifest extraordinary versitility and adaptability that are nowhere to be found in an individual ant. And just as it has been pointed out that the average of the guesses at the solution of a problem whose complexity is beyond the reckoning of the individual guessers, is almost always more accurate than the single most accurate guess. Such as takes place when a very large number of jelly beans are placed in an urn in order to raffle off a car to the closes guess at the exact number of beans in a large urn. The average guess is almost always more accurate than any individual guess. But the urn at a county fair charity auction does not have the likes of Fox News to contend with. That is, it does not have some mechanism of deception at play, like a hidden grapefruit in among the jellybeans, that undermines the ability to make one's best guess. But the extraordinary epigenetic advantages of democracy will never be allowed to have it's day. There is no democracy anywhere. Lots of republics, which give the illusion of a democracy while maintaining the status quo of the power elite, who, as amazingly coincidental as it seems, are exactly the reason everything is a mess in the first place. Any democratic revolution is quickly subsumed by the forces of corruption, as are all the more authoritarian forms of government. I personally am in favor of a kind of Retro-Confucian-Techno-Meritocracy that would assign offices to various candidates based on their abilities to pass a harrowing course of tests and simulated scenarios, as a regularly scheduled government upgrade open to all, and perhaps participated in by all mandatorily, since the last person on earth to whom you should ever invest power over others is someone who seeks it. No matter their rationalizations and lies to themselves or others.
    1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409.  @lukehallatt394  More like 40k a day. That rate is wearing out barrels faster than they can be replaced. Western weapons have more range than Russian and are much more accurate. One rocket propelled excalibur shell can do what twenty dumb outdated Russian shells often cannot. Russia is unable to replace its high tech missiles. But the main thing is that Russia is at the edge of a cliff of demographic collapse. Everyone with any potential who was able to, has fled Russia, It is not able to produce enough people to continue on the level it has been, It has massive drug addiction, way higher than the west or the USA and alcohol problems, rampant AIDs and one out of every four Russians has a antibiotic resitant form of TB. Russia has basically no future, that's why it is making it's move now, before it just collapses. And at the same time, Putin is the world richest man. He holds his wealth via third party insiders who he holds the power of life and death over. This wealth is hidden in dummy corporations set up by German lawyers in Panama, and most of it is invested in American corporations, many of them in the defense industry. So when Putin attacks a country that responds with American weapons, it is a very good financial move for him personally. And the cancellations of Russian built armaments just keep slipping in. Basically if you see Russia accusing another country of some inhumane or bellicose act it is a sure sign that they do it themselves and the accused does not. They have been playing the same tune since the revolution, and anyone with any sense and potential should get out if they can.
    1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. How much more evidence do people need to understand that the DNC is composed of cheating compromised co-opted scumbags? Slowly via the new distributed media of the internet people are learning about their continuing ongoing dirty tricks in the service of their oligarch masters. The cheating has already begun with the introduction of an app that Iowa caucus will use to report local results. From the sellouts at NPR: Iowa's Democrats hope the new app lets the party get results out to the public quicker, says Troy Price, the chairman of the state party. In an interview, Price declined to provide more details about which company or companies designed the app, or about what specific measures have been put in place to guarantee the system's security. But security is a priority, he says. The state party worked with the national party's cybersecurity team, and with Harvard University's Defending Digital Democracy project, but Price declined to answer directly whether any third party has investigated the app for vulnerabilities, as many cybersecurity experts recommend. "We as the party have taken this very seriously, and we know how important it is for us to make sure that our process is secure and that we protect the integrity of the process," Price says. "We want to make sure we are not relaying information that could be used against us." Unlike many states in which local and state officials oversee the presidential primary election, in Iowa the state party is responsible for administering, staffing and funding the caucuses, relying primarily on trained but unpaid volunteers. Cybersecurity experts interviewed by NPR said that the party's decision to withhold the technical details of its app doesn't do much to protect the system — and instead makes it hard to have complete confidence in it. "The idea of security through obscurity is almost always a mistake," says Doug Jones, a computer science professor at the University of Iowa and a former caucus precinct leader. "Drawing the blinds on the process leaves us, in the public, in a position where we can't even assess the competence of the people doing something on our behalf."
    1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narrative that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues including this one (though not quite as bad as most). You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and performance in virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. Border security is the issue that Trump will slaughter any progressive on. They will trumpet the idea that Bernie wants open borders even though it's not true. The Americans who have been victimized by the power-elite will once again blame it on the least among us. Americans do not want people allowed into the country just because they decided to ignore our laws. Why can't the people that I agree with on almost every other issue understand this. The people who will decide who wins the election, the 70k rust belt voters, want people to follow the law when applying for citizenship. And if the idea is in their mind that Bernie will have open boarders or reward those who spat on our laws to enter illegally, Trump will win again. Now you know why he will win. These are the issues that make Trump 1- border security, 2 - abortion 3 - 2nd amendment rights. These are the issues that the people whose votes count the most care the most about. If you don't realize this you are one of the people living in a PC dreamland. Abortion and firearms are the matters that will determine the votes of many people who are willing to vote against their own best interests no matter what. Border security and the rewarding of those whom, like Trump, think that they are above the law by entering illegally is the issue that will determine the election. If Bernie wants to win he better change his tune on citizenship for those that entered illegally, and convince the public that he will not open the borders. If you think we have a polarized society now with an evaporating middle class, look at any country south of the border, Americans do not want that for their country. PS. I predict a huge caravan of Central Americanss making it's way toward the US border during the election. Think about how that will play to those 70k rust belt voters. Trump will win in a landslide unless Bernie modifies his position on the people who are already here and the manner in which these people are processed legally. We must stop rewarding people for breaking our laws, both Trump and his ilk, and those who enter the country illegally.
    1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. This whole subject is the babble of the insane puritanical conditioning of the populace by the psychopaths that are in control. These laws create a climate in which people turn to street drugs and the hell our laws hand to them. It is insane to think that prohibition works. It does not work and it has never worked. Even in countries with death penalties for use and sale of drugs, it does not work. Opioids are one of the most benign drugs you can use long term. Less harmful than common over the counter drugs that the fools who believe these laws take regularly. Switzerland solved their heroin problem by making it freely available to addicts. What happened? They self titrated and went back to work instead of being out on the street trying to come up with the money for dealers.  This whole problem is self-created. Perhaps we should return to the ultra insane times when doctors and loved ones would withhold pain meds from those in their care who were dying in agony, because they did not want them to become addicted in the final months of their lives. This used to happen all the time, not so long ago. I witnessed it happen to a beloved great aunt when I was a teenager. Anyone who supports this policy is an idiot and thinks that doing the same thing that doesn't work over and over again is a good idea. Why were opioids made illegal in the first place? Because the miners and other factory serfs in England began to prefer tinctures of opium as opposed to alcohol. With good reason. So of course the distillers demonized the use of same. While the facts are that opioids are far less harmful than alcohol or even than tylenol. If you don't know these facts, and I suspect you do not. You basically know nothing about what you have commented on. Which is par for the course on the net. If you really dislike drug dealers, both criminal and noncriminal, then you should be in favor of complete decriminalization of all molecules, and the sanction for anyone to grow any plant they want to and use it themselves, like any free adult should be able to do. Then a person could grow a little plot of poppies and treat their own pain.
    1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. I am just befuddled by the implication of the name. As you know, Prometheus is the titan that stole fire from the gods and gave it to mankind. Which in general metaphoric terms means he bestowed technology on them, the advent of technology implies the ignition of the symbolic thought beyond the genetically directed instinctive behaviors. The advent of man representing to himself what can be, instead of just perceiving "what is". He sees a dried field, he can imagine it as what it is not: an irritated field. He sees water flowing in a ditch, he imagines it as it is not: rising above it;'s own level, and envisions the configurations, some workable some not, of materials that could result in water doing this very un-water-like action. This would later lead to all kinds of problems with humanity called differences of opinion, especially about one of his other fantasies that came true, geopolitics. Needless to say we are far down the rabbit hole and stating that all this kind of military development is insane to begin with, means little in a world dominated by the results of mankind seeing things "not as they are". Without which possibility there would be no technological, intellectual, or artistic culture. But of course this angered the gods, because really, igniting the mind function in man was analogous to eating the apple that got another mythical character expelled from paradise. So the gods condemned Prometheus to be chained to a rock for eternity, and each day an eagle would fly down and tear out his liver and eat it. I guess titans can grow back their livers in a day. So what the hell were the people who named this missile getting at, if anything?
    1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. @Danford Smith I am always surprised and delighted when someone responds to something I have posted without hostility or some immature form of criticism. As you point out, these new forms of media present a challenge and there is no shortage of persons with views that entail various degrees of squirrelliness (if that is a word). My main interest is in the apparent ability that some very few people have to experience their existence in a hyperconsious manner. This has been my raison d'etre for well over fifty years. So please indulge me if everything I mention is relative to the central concept (as erroneous as any such conception necessarily is) of awakening or enlightenment. If a person is not enlightened at the very moment, even if they themselves have had experiences wherein they were conscious in a manner that makes their ordinary state appear impoverished, mechanical, and dead by comparison, they know nothing about this higher state, can't say anything accurate or useful about it, and have no memories about it that aren't self-deception. Of course if one is talking, or thinking (or writing) they ain't -- as it's called -- AWAKE. I almost wrote a little discourse on why AI will never be conscious. But alternately and just as accurately I could have written about why the thought-centric-mind (which most people refer to as "I") is not, and can never be conscious. I can hear the objections rising in minds out there even before I have posted this. But just for a minute for the benefit of anyone who may come across this, whose potential for an enriched form of conscious functioning has not totally atrophied, let's just imagine that the view I am presenting is less incorrect than their present view: that they are the source of their thoughts and that the thought arising in them are theirs. Well I am going to stop now. I doubt if this made any sense to anyone or if there is anyone out there who would be interested enough to merit further comment. But allow me to once more quote one of my favorite statements on this apparent subject (I say "apparent" because what I am attempting to refer to, is not and CANNOT be a subject). When referring to what can be considered accurate in this regard Carlos Dwa wrote: . . . "If you can think it, it cannot be correct."
    1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. Politics sucks ass. Isn't it apparent to everyone by now that our political system is an archaic artifact? An artifact based on humanities inability to escape it's bestial warlike nature . . . :campaigns, winner take all victories, leaders who neither lead (excepting the advancement of the concerns of their patrons) nor have the wisdom to make intelligent impartial decisions on the issues of the day. This political web of deceit is a self-perpetuating parasite that warps collective social culture and is itself continually warped due to shameful self-interested exploitation by those who control the economy through control of debt manipulation. Interests and principalities that spew false narratives which have contaminated every aspect of our expectations of daily life, and our future aspirations (or lack of them). I suggest to you that there are other alternatives. Far more efficient alternatives, that would benefit the whole of society and reduce the corruption that is not only a systemic disease of our political system, but is now the very sinew, marrow, and circulatory system, of a body politic that has done everything possible to free itself from both morality and justice: through legislative and legal complexities, technicality, outright lies, and all manner of fuckery. It is time to evolve folks. Like a cool pool on a hot day, once you take the plunge it's refreshing and rejuvenating, but before you take that plunge there is hesitation and a resistance to a state change. And we must change the state of our state unless we consider moving into the future by looking through a rear-view mirror and stepping on our own dicks every step of the way while perpetually bitiching about it to be some kind of desirable human prerogative. Because as it is, it will never be able to meet our real human needs or provide anything more than updated reruns of the same old conundrums. If human culture and civilization is to advance it must evolve to a higher state, a higher system of state, which will nurture higher states of mind in the populace, not continually drag it back by aggravating the primal survival instinct in a technological environment wherein this instinct is counterproductive on numerous levels. I suggest to you that a body politic based on a NeoConfusian Techno-Meritocracy would be so vastly superior for the state of the state, state of the economy, state of human advancement, and our collective state of mind, that any comparison to the present drunken-knife-fight-in-a-gilded-bordello that passes for our government would be comical.
    1
  3523. These "news people" are shameless. It is so obvuous that Bloomburg has some of then co-opted. Money talks and Bloomburg's money also tips. Did you see the debate? If so why would you care what these people think? They are all elitists, some of them are nice elitists, but come on. they have been dismissing Bernie since the get go and now are being forced to admit the reality. What is the reality? The reality is that Bernie is not only the most popular senator, not only the most popular politician in Congress, not only the most popular politician in the Country he is the most popular politician in the world -- because thinking and compassionate people the world over are praying that the USA will come out of this movement into unconsciousness and the promotion of a policies based on primitive emotions and knee-jerk reactions will come to an end. They know they need us, and they need us sane and humane if civilization is going to have any chance of surviving the psychopaths that have gotten themselves into positions of power via charisma and cunning. To these "journalists" this is a game that pays more money, the more stupid things they can say about it. This is not a game. If the right-wing nuts like Mercer, and his flunkies, like Trump, maintain the reigns of power: your are getting a deal on a squirt gun while your house is in a fire storm of lies and disinformation, on subjects that will determine the lives of your children and perhaps yourself. End this insanity. Pick the right man for a change, not the richest, the best connected or the one that lies best, choose who you actually think is the best. . . not the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is the choice that Goldman Sachs and the other banksters will give you.  This is your one chance in your lifetime to vote for a real person who is not a cats paw for elements of corruption. It's not a sexy subject but it you pay attention, Bernie knows how important it is to get money out of elections. How important is it? It is the most important issue. It is the basis of the legalized bribery that insures that you elected official are there: not to represent the voice of the people, no, rather they are there to make sure that the voice of the people never gets a hearing, and if by some chance on some issue it does get a hearing they will make sure it is never acted upon. Don't be fearful and full of hate, humanity has a golden destiny that has been stolen from the many by the few. It is time to wake up and clarify our nation's values once more. Not in meaningless word or deceitful narratives designed to seduce by playing to fears and greed. We cannot move into the new age using a rear-view mirror for a guidance system. Don't be afraid, Bernie's views and positions are not more radical than the Scandinavian views and practices and even the vaunted quality of upward social mobility is higher in all of them then it is here. Not to mention personal happiness and financial security and safety. Don't let the people who own the media make you paranoid. They have a greedy reason for misrepresenting the fact as did Boomburg tonight with is talk of communism and such. It's just ridiculous that he could stand there and insult the public's intelligence so blatantly. Fear not, feel the Bern.
    1
  3524. Here's the news: A compulsive liar has been lying, and the people who report about the compulsive liar are shameless, and apparently brainless rumor mongers trying to gain ratings to increase the profit they make selling commercial time. Both the compulsive liar, the networks, cable networks, and popular mass media are almost entirely owned by the same people who own the various politicians (including Trump). They present an apparent adversarial relationship to the clueless public who is continually brainwashed by their spin and lies 24/7. This fake dichotomy: liberal/conservative, pro-trump/anti-trump, religious/pragmatic, up/down, right/wrong, true/false is continually infused into the collective awareness, in order to keep them divided and in conflict, so that a hand full of megalomaniac auto-compulsive psychopaths and their deviant sycophant enablers (including police and military that are willing to violate the rights of private citizens) can maintain the stranglehold they have over the wealth and destiny of humanity. And you all fall for it continually -- continually. . . . even the smart ass critics among you are deluded by the human nervous systems natural tendency to divide everything into two opposing vectors, simply because the nervous system itself operates on opposing charges we have designated as positive and negative in the ionic sphere. The reality is that almost no one has anything outside of the magic circle of these dichotomies to say. Not that I expect anything objective (outside of the scientific disciplines and even that is stretching it) out of humanity at this point, but you should at least know were you stand, if you are capable of that. You stand firmly on the shores of delusions made real by acts they inspire.
    1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567.  @smacksman1  Kind of strange how hard it is to find specific info on usage in battle. To me personally, I expect it will be kind of hard to mask whether or not it is as effective as the statistics indicate when used in Ukraine. I expect it will be. It's apparently been around in an ever evolving form since the late nineties. According to Wikipedia the program started in 92 and the first big batch was delivered in 97. I'm glad you asked this question, because I knew it had been deployed but no real details. Someone told me they had seen a lot of early Excaliburs fail to explode but it could have just been bull, or a Russian bot-brain. What we do seem sure of is that their have been loads of development and variation. When DARPA really get behind a tech, nobody does it better. So we know that 690 Ex shells have been fired in theater. In Afghanistan. I had thought Iraq and possibly elsewhere, but I was probably wrong about Iraq, and if it was use in battle elsewhere I can't find it. It was first used in battle in Afghanistan in 2008. Apparently mostly used to kill Taliban that attacked isolated outposts. Apparently it works so well that commanders frequently called in fire with only a fifty meter distance between themselves and the enemy, with devastating effect. We are talking one shell to end an attack by fifty or so bad guys. That is quite a different scenario since the Taliban, didn't really have artillery of effect. But it seems to me that this anti-artillery roll is more or less what the Ex was made for. I mean, it can hit moving targets on the first try. And the USA and allied countries have loads of them. They are not going to run out, by just destroying all the Russian artillery and tanks, they probably have enough to do that several time. Of course, like some have pointed out, the problem is not going to be Russian artillery, but air to ground and high tech guided missiles. I have already made my comments on that, being a losing propositioning for the Russians, who are estimated to have already used the bulk of their missiles blowing up apartment buildings and theaters and hospitals. I guess we will see how good the German medium range anti-aircraft armor is, and eventually how good the Israeli Iron Dome system is. I would not want to be near Russian Artillery when the German and Dutch donated German self-propelled howitzers show up, and the American and Canadian towed guns can network and do exactly the same things, less parts, less to go wrong. It the Russians don't have some form of total air superiority by then they are basically screwed. I would love to see a first use of the Norwegian ram-jet shell during this conflict. What an awesome ordinance for the free world, and Norway may be one of the best of the west, even though it is kind of east.
    1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. The USA is not a democracy. It was never intended to be a democracy by the founders. It is a constitutional republic, which is a form of government designed to present the illusion of democracy to the populace while keeping real power and wealth in the hands of a few families and power elite plutocrats. This may or may not be a good thing. A real direct democracy, which is only evident in a few regions of Switzerland and nowhere else in the world, or history, would be a catastrophe in a culture which is most typified by it's public information being basically one or another narrative that are actually partisan webs of lies, as are evident in all our mass media venues. You cannot have an effective democracy when there are no controls on the dissemination of disinformation and false narratives, by corporations chasing advertising revenues and scoundrels seeking power. To think this will ever amount to anything other than the hodgepodge of insanity that is our public forum of debate is itself insane. It's time to grow up and wrest the sinews of our culture from the vision-less power seekers who control it. Human culture must evolve to propel humanity into it's possible golden destiny on earth and among the stars. It is time to seriously move toward a culture that is a true meritocracy, a neoConfusian techno-meritocracy where there are government upgrades and not elections. Time to give up the old paradigms which are based on war and campaigns, deceit, and the scum rising to the top. We have the technology and science to design a system that can truly determine the best candidates for positions of collective responsibility, by extreme and unbiased vetting, background checks, psychological tests, judgement evaluations by performance in intelligence tests and performance in virtual scenarios, evaluation of past performance, sophistication of problem solving abilities and other verifiable objective methods rather than the standards now in use, (sex appeal, appearance, psychopathic tendencies, the ability to lie convincingly, what family you were born into, the animal lust to pursue power and how much you promise to steal for or from the one percent.) Also there must be consequences for the dissemination of disinformation and conspiracy fantasies in mass media. I suggest caning and banishment after the confiscation of all wealth.
    1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. Makes perfect political sense to not include Tesla in the EV meeting. Tesla is only the number one selling EV. Tesla is only the most American car in production, that is sold in America. Tesla only makes an EV that is a half dozen years ahead of the closest competitor. Tesla is only the company with the only viable charging network. Tesla is only the most ethical company in the entire auto world. Tesla only has, not only the number one selling EV but what will be without a doubt the number one selling car in the world. Tesla is only the actual reason that any other auto company is now going electric. Tesla only builds the safest autos to be in: in a crash. Tesla is so far beyond Biden's concept of what the future will look like, that he doesn't deserve to be in the same reality, let alone sit at the table with Tesla. Tesla is only the car company with the highest degree of owner satisfaction. Tesla only offers a car that is faster than any other production auto no matter the price, and can still can carry four adults and their golf clubs and full overnight gear while doing it. The media and the companies that would have rather had you die in a wreck because it was cheaper, until Nader forced them to adopt seat belts and collapsing steering columns, have been looking for a way to overcome Tesla, because it is so obviously superior in product and production than the dinosaur auto companies -- and it doesn't pay the crime family-like commercial media the advertising vig that the other car companies depend on to sell you dreams. Dreams that will not even approach the reality that is living right now in Tesla products and production methods. Buttegieg drives a Tesla, but with McCluen like rear-view mirror vision, leads us onward into the fog. And it's not even his rear-view mirror that he is looking through. It's the one lent to him by the dino-auto industry. The one that says "LIMITED VISION: objects are more crudely engineered than they appear in the ads". No unions at Tesla, Musk wants the workers to own Tesla. That's how it should be done. And besides that slimy scumbag head of the dept of trans, Pete Butt looks like Mickey Mouse: all he needs are two large white gloves and some ears . . . it's him! . . . it's Mickey Mouse!
    1
  3651.  @hizzlemobizzle  Almost everything you wrote is incorrect. China has the largest EV market. China does not sell EVs the companies in China sell them. The number one selling car in China is a 4k Wuling Hong Guang MINI EV. It is little more than a golf kart and not in the same league as a Tesla. Tesla has the number two selling EV in China: the model 3. So your facts are wrong again. Your theory that I want Tesla to have a monopoly is ridiculous. There are loads of EV manufacturers -- Tesla is simply a decade ahead of all of them, because Tesla put in the real work and research. It is actually amazing how much misinformation you manged to pack into your comment. Tesla has stated that it is going to open up it's charging network to all EVs, so there goes another one of your mistakes. A simple attachment to the charging cable will make this possible. Tesla has opened up all of its patents for other car manufacturers to use, there goes your theory that it is just another greedy corporation. You could not be more wrong about everything you stated as fact. Either you are unable to discriminate between facts and disinformation or you are purposely spreading nonsense. I can document everything I wrote, your own sources are dubious, if you have any. Oh, and Japan does not claim to have a solid state battery, but Toyota claims to be working on one. It also claims to have a viable hydrogen system -- not. Tesla is way ahead of everyone in the battery arena, and when they do catch up, well they won't catch up because Tesla dose not stand still. Also your remarks about billionaire space tourists do not apply to SpaceX. Elon is so far beyond your petty remarks that to anyone who knows anything about the situation you sound like an envious critter indeed.
    1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. I finally listened to this on a drive a day after making several comments. It was more or less what one expected, well less to be honest. It would be an easy and useless matter to find fault with every comment it contained. Despite this I will offer one "amendment" to a few of the initial statements. In particular about the supposed benefit or sentimental inner psychodrama in asking oneself what is often taken for a profound question: "Who am I?" If you are one of the few who are actually attempting to transform the dimension of your apperceptive awareness the question "Who am I?" will get you nowhere real only further into the high security area of the associative prison you are already in. For the few with such an aim this is a wrong question. It is the equivalent of asking the color of the elephant in your dresser drawer and having to determine this without looking in the drawer but perhaps by asking Chat GTP. In other words not only is it useless but it is meaningless as regards your aim. A certain modification of this question, if taken to "heart" can provide a benefit with regard to the direction you are drawn to. That modification can be approximated by the words "What is "I" ?" and the unnatural arousal of the prowess to observe you subjective process, including this self-reflective observation as objectively as you are able. When referring to human capabilities of being aware above the level of the automatic thought-centric associative mind, all word are misleading and in a very basic manner erroneous. This is not a concept it is an action described in concepts, the proof is in the doing: in the activity. Total objectivity IN THE MOMENT, of ones subjective process (appercreption) IS "cosmic consciousness". More accurately: is to be consciously aware on a cosmic level. Simple as that, and almost any one in a hundred thousand people drawn to such conscious evolution can do it. And most of the rest really don't want to, no matter what their lips (inner or outer) confess.
    1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670.  @BlazeHT  First of all I am not in the least a right winger, I was imprisoned for antiwar political action in the sixties and have never voted for a republican or any democrat other than Biden and I hate Biden but Trump made me sick on a daily basis. I supported Bernie with both time and quite a bit of money. Need I add, "You presumptious jerk?" Second of all, it was exactly what I said: a sting operation that went wrong. They thought they could trace strawman purchases from Arizona gun dealers to the drug cartels, but they were unable to for several reasons, some of them having to do with court decisions. There were arrests of the Americans who purchased the guns but they were unable to trace the flow of guns to higher level drug lords, like they expected to. This was hardly what it was presented as in these comments. The ATF did not purchase the guns and donate them to the cartels, they simply were unable to follow the seemingly legal purchases that were actually illegal straw purchases. To allow a minor crime like a straw purchase to proceed in order to bust a bigger criminal is a typical law enforcement tactic. It is funny though how people like you think that I am a right winger because I see through the narrative that typical so-called progressives present, on the other hand real right-wing nuts think I am a communist revolutionary because I call them on their torrential confabulation of idiotic narratives. Anyone who steps outside of the inane political duality of left and right and calls them as they see them experiences this completely automatic reaction from those who have been swallowed whole by a particular viewpoint.
    1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689.  @reforest4fertility  I think you are confusing the Mujahideen with the Taliban. The Mujahideen began in an uprising in 1979 by Afghans against the USSR and the puppet communist government in Afghanistan. The Mujahideen fought a long costly war against the Red Army, which suffered many losses and started withdrawing from the country in 1988, after which the war against the existing regime continued. The loosely aligned Mujahideen took Kabul in 1992 following the collapse of the Moscow-backed government. However their new government was quickly fractured by rival factions, becoming dysfunctional, which escalated into another civil war from which the Taliban formed. So the Taliban did not even exist in the 80's. Though it may be true that some of the Mujahideen later became Taliban. The Mujahideen were supported a bit by the USA, and other nations and even private donors. The Taliban was not supported by the USA. The USSR and their puppet communist government in Afghanistan was firmly entrenched before the Mujahideen let alone the Taliban even came into existence, so no the USA did not use the Taliban to draw Russia into a war in Afghanistan. The civil war against the communist government and the occupation by the USSR was by the Mujahideen who were mostly native Afghans trained in Pakistan, but also included Islamic fighters from other countries that joined voluntarily. The USA eventually supported the Mujahideen with some shoulder launched ground to air missiles. But the uprising against the government and the USSR occupation was well underway before the USA finally sent any support.
    1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. There isn't. They just cannot stand anything that contradicts their contorted and inaccurate narrative. I just recommended that book to you, as a peek into the actual history as opposed to the fantasy that is believed by these various spokes people for the first American nations. This woman whom is speaking references this history as a series of massacres. I merely pointed out that although this is correct, most of the massacres were unbelievably brutal massacres of European families. The massacres of native villages that occurred were a result of this propensity of the war bands to murder civilians in retribution for losses against and general inability to confront the US armed forces. It's not hard to find if you can distinguish between historic facts and the disinformation found at DN. Basically the First Nations are now presented as peace loving environmentalists. Which may be true for some of them now, but when you project that back into history it is a lie. They had no environmental awareness and one of the great extinction events followed the progress of the Asian invasive species of humans as they settled in the Americas. They were brutal to each other, practiced torture and many of them also practiced cannibalism routinely and produced some of the most insane and hideous cultures ever know to man, that were in continual hyper savage warfare among themselves, without developing any of the benefits of civilization such as writing and the wheel -- or much of anything else. I had a post deleted eight times yesterday that did not even detail most of these facts except for the note on the massacres and it was only a recounting of the actual facts. But what is pushed as fact here on DN is the idea that all the evils that befell the First Nations was the doing of white Europeans. This was a stone age culture, do you really think that after the Americas was discovered by the rest of the world that it would be left alone by nations with a higher level of technology and culture? That has never happened anywhere on earth, and the same thing that happened to the native Americans happened to every group of primitives that came in contact with something like Rome or the Assyrian Empire. That's human life. The horse tribes of Europe are also gone, you probably never even heard of them. The problem is that losers never forget, and they romanticize about a golden past that never existed. Take the confederate south as a prime example.
    1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. Trumps supporters being mostly lower class and upper class and not much of an in-between illustrates the blinding flash of the obvious that Trump supporters are either multimillionares . . . or fools. Not because to be poor, is to be a fool, but of course (I feel the need to spell this out here because you can never underestimate the comprehension of random people, but I am not implying an assumption that you personally need it spelled out) because to be poor and a Trump supporter is to be a fool, if you consider people who harm themselves to be foolish. On the other hand, IF the world was actually structured and worked in the manner that most Trump supporters of low income believe it does, then their Trump support would make perfect sense. We are talking vectors here, the specifics are irrelevant. In fact, one objective look at the so-called political systems, and their underpinning, that populate our planet should inform the observer that what is happening is just window dressing on barbarism, it's just a theater of the mind, a velvet glove on an iron fist. I don't know of any system of government or rule that rises above the idiotic, or so it would seem, if the object of the system is to optimize, as much as is possible, all honorable aspects of human existence, and to curtail those commonly deemed as undesirable, the present systems of governance found on earth are archaic trash: just an excuse for the same old kleptocratic autocompulsive psychopaths, to further inflate their already vein-glorious miniminds in the vacuous reflections of the sycophants that surround and enable their insanity because of their own highly deviated and corrupted survival impulse. They wish they were a real boy, but despite the world of suffering they create by trying to fill their truly vacuous lives with babbles of all types, real life eludes them, and always will. Even ole' Socrates knew that a person that seeks power should never be trusted with it. Human political culture is a joke. An eighth grade class could come up with a better system than the battered whore the banksters and one percent -- have afforded the world. It's a joke, a sin, and a wasted opportunity to evolve our culture into one that would nurture the greatness that humanity could be. But we ain't great, and we never have been, though for sure, an individual here and there, now and then has been -- great that is. Though to tell you the truth Alexander wasn't, and neither was his teacher Aristotle. Two utter failures that the world has adored for over two millennia. So wad ya gonna due -- aye?
    1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. It's not just the radical right that is systemically insane regarding climate change. The prime example is how the nitwit left is treating Tesla. All these protests and thousands of people have done nothing to address the problem compared to Tesla. They are all "bla bla bla" and Tesla actually walks the walk, and what does it get? Back of the line and not even recognized for its enormous and continuing contributions to greenhouse gas abatement. Foaming at the mouth woke puddin' heads who hate Tesla because Musk is rich and showing a way to a golden future for mankind. Ludites who understand nothing of Tesla's breakthroughs and continuing campaign to bring hope of a future worthy of humanity. The appointment of Tesla haters like Cummings to positions that control the industry. Just envious small minds who think that marching in favor of political solutions is an effective action: political solutions that will never take place because the people who created the problem are in control of establishing the perception of a working solution. We have been marching for environmental protection since the sixties and the result is NOTHING. A president who sucks up to unions shops no matter how hopelessly behind the tech that Tesla has developed, who supports FORD (who manufactures their EVs in Mexico (thus the recent modification to the rebates that disregards where they are built, instead of Tesla, which builds cars with the most American parts and labor of ALL vehicles, and a gov. who fails to even recognize the real progress they have made. This last election is the first and last time I vote for a lesser of two evils, the democrats and republicans are both corrupt beyond reform, and need to put a gun in their collective mouths and pull the trigger so the rest of us can return to sanity. The only real hope we have is if people like Musk demonstrate, and he has been demonstrating like hell, just how to make money cleaning up the mess that the petro economy has created. Elon Musk is now, since yesterday, the richest man in history, and he did it working for the good of the environment and the hope of a golden future for mankind and still the left and right imbeciles bitch about him and do everything they can politically to subvert his efforts. Wake the fu@k up.
    1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. I'll save you the time of watching this, I didn't and don't need to. If you think your brain is the so-called conscious associative mind. It is possible to upload it, because what you think of as you, or "I" is completely mechanical. I know you cannot see this, your not supposed to be able to for your own good (in most cases). Your subjective experience is not a truly conscious experience. Your subjective experience is determined not by what you consider to be you, or your consciousness (consciousness is an illusion just as runningness would be an illusion for a runner who is sitting) but by the metabolic substrate in which your subjective experience takes place. This has been demonstrated that "consciousness" is the last to know about events that your unconscious aspects have already reacted to. So yes the mechanical illusion you refer to as the mind could be simulated and uploaded, but it would be a shadow of what a person really is, a shadow of a shadow really, and without the anchoring in reality provided by a limbic system and other essential aspects of your animal nature it would be quite insane in short order. Well actually it would not even be authentically insane, just an approximation of a mechanism that is not conscious as you believe it to be because your are entirely identified with it, but without the belief in its indispensable illusion of identity. Sorry if that doesn't make sense to you. If it doesn't it is because you are entirely identified with the quite mechanical dynamics of the thought-centric-mind and have never see it's/your true nature.
    1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. News flash: CNN, MSNBC, and the usual suspects report:. . . In the primary race between Sanders and Buttigieg, Pete came in second over all, while Sanders came in next to last. Democracy and the so called representative democracy, democratic republic or constitutional republic are very different things. They are forms of democracy. In most cases minus the democracy part. When people blithely state that we live in a democracy it is incorrect and misleading, like most of the paradigms that the public is continually bombarded with via the corporate news. A republic is just a way for the plutocrats to stay in power and still have people think they are in a participatory democracy. The only democracy in US government is is that of congress, and they are 98% owned by the power-elite that decide who will run and fund their reelection campaigns with the legalized bribes of their campaign contributions. There is representation, but not for you and me. We live in a farce. Are you not paying attention? Do you think that this cheating is something new? Your "representatives" are not there to represent you, they are there for the most part to make sure that the voices of the people never get heard, and if they get heard to never be acted upon. Or if they are once in a blue moon forced by popular uprising to act for the people, soon as the masses disperse they will dismember the body that threatened their power one discontent at a time, jailed, disappeared, or simply smeared and ignored by the corporate media. Have you not been present? Look around. . . . Real democracy, true democracy exists nowhere on earth other than present day Switzerland and never has (that I am aware of). Representative democracy is a convoluted fraudulent conception. Democracy is something that we are continually told we have, which we do not. We have democracy in the same sense that the slaves, women, citizens without land, and foreigners had a democracy in the golden age of Athens. Only they knew that they did not have a vote or any real participation in the government. Most Americans do not know that. It should be obvious to anybody with the slightest ability to perceive what is actually going on that this is a conceptual illusion that is used to mislead and quell the disenfranchised mob. Bring on the super-delegates, the Iowa national delegate formula, the electoral collage, the PACz and Citizens United -- a democracy would not abide these contaminants, or entertain their adoption for even a moment. A democracy and the state we live in are two very different things. In a democracy the one with the most votes is not the loser like in the USA. The courts have decided that even determination of who will be the candidates, such as occurs in the legendary smoke filled rooms of the DNC and RNC has no legal obligation to be fair or democratic in our two party system. . . . ??????? We live in a kleptocracy with a democratic shroud over it, and most people, like almost all people, do not understand how their rights and money are being stolen from them by corporate pilferage and plunder. In fact our present government is functionally a cryptofascist kleptocracy in which all real power, control of the men with guns and uniforms, the state, and the economy is held by a small group of lying psychopaths. Like Robert Mercer,, the Koch brother, Bezos and the mob of banksters that suck up the wealth of the nation like vampires and offer nothing but bullshit and corruption in return. And you CNN, are a big part of it. In fact people will come to recognize that you are a key member of the new axis of evil. FaceBook -- Buttigieg -- CNN
    1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. The corporate news is still trying to black-out Bernie. Bernie, and Tulsi are the only candidates with any integrity, something the networks and cable news despises. Bernie understands that the lynch-pin of all the legalized corruption in our constitutional republic is campaign finance. What now passes for "business as usual" was not long ago a criminal act. But many progressives do not understand this. They are bored by the subject but excited by all kinds of meaningless PC rhetoric. While I was at a Nader rally in Santa Cruz back during his 2000 run, he said he had time for one more question. I yelled out "Campaign finance!" When he indicated that this was the subject he would address there was an audible groan from this most progressive crowd in America's most leftest town, . I guess most people never consider the fact that if Nader had won, we would have never attacked Iraq and the 2008 great recession (where-in the same people who caused it were put in charge of fixing it and managed to steal trillions in public funds for themselves and the institutions they hid their criminal activities behind) would never have occurred. And I would like to remind everyone that the criminals behind this, who had bribed the legislative branch with campaign contributions, were also the people who changed the laws to allow this disastrous turn of our republic. Which was unequaled until the retrograde idiot section of the supreme court passed Citizens United and other decisions of a antiAmerican nature that benefited the one-percent and their brain-washed right-wing idiot minions. Sorry if this comment went on for longer than a Twitter-brain can attend to. But if you notice, the comments that always get the most likes are always the most obvious and usually the most knee-jerk in nature. Never believe the "first-story": whether given by the government, the corporate news, the republocrats, or your own reactionary quite mechanical mind
    1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. The most significant weapons in the war: On the Russian side the Krasnopol and Krasnopol M guided artillery shells with a max range of about 12 miles and a hit rate on specific targets of about 80%. The Russian also have a rocket propelled guided artillery round thought to be the equal or better in range of the American rocket propelled guided Excalibur shell. The American Excalibur is devastatingly accurate and can be used by existing M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers which can send Excalibur rounds to 39.3 kilometers (24.4 miles), which ERCA an extended barrel length howitzer can now lob to 43 miles. Their is a German/South African gun that reportedly can do a little better. The Canadians recently supplied Ukraine with both the Excalibur rounds and the Dutch gave a small number of self-propelled howitzers that can use it. It can also be used by the towed guns recently supplied by the USA and Canada. The use and efficiency of these shells in an anti-artillery role by the competing Russian and recently supplied American radar controlled systems that can target and fire on artillery units within seconds of their use may be the knife edge upon which the entire war is determined, baring the deployment of western air power, in Ukraine. To me the most exciting development in this field is that Norway's Nammo has unveiled a potentially revolutionary concept for an air-breathing, ramjet-powered, pseudo-missile that any standard 155mm howitzer can fire at targets more than 60 miles away. A truly great time for Norway, and Nammo to supply the 155s with a shell that can reach out and touch Russian artillery with little or no exposure other than to air to ground or guide missile fire. To have Russia exchange expensive guided missiles for common artillery with uncommon munitions, is not such a bad exchange in a scenario in which missile production is dependent upon western tech they no longer have access to.
    1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. It's really very simple. If you are the kind of person who likes to push other people around, you become a cop so you don't have to pay the natural consequences of your criminal behavior. I am in my seventies. I have never needed a cop for any reason during my entire life. Over my life I have gotten about five traffic violations that were complete lies, and the cops lied in court, and the magistrate knew they were lying, and the cops knew they were lying, and I knew they were lying, but we proceeded as if that were not the case. Back in the sixties I had the misfortune of living in a dorm that was inhabited by the son of a local chief of police in Allentown PA, a famous chief of police who had a police academy named after him. I guess he got his son a part time job as a paid informant. This scumbag merely turned in heroin and made up times and places and said that about a half dozen students sold it to him. Months after the alleged event we were rounded up and arrested purely on the lies this scumbag told. I imagine most were pot smokers, I was. So they charged us with sale and possession of heroin and marijuana, which I had never even seen in my lifetime, nor did I know anyone who had ever used heroin. And they got everyone to plead guilty to the sale and possession of pot in order for them to drop the heroin charges. I never smoked pot in front of this scumbag, let alone sold it to him. Everyone knew he was a narc. But faced with the prospect of the possibility of twenty years in prison or a few months in county jail, I think anyone would have been coerced into pleading guilty to a crime they didn't commit. So my life was basically thrown off the rails so this dickhead could advance in his career. And that was just a few kids who were damaged and alienated from the law in our teens, he went on to do this over and over and never to this day, has anything happened to him. And this happens every day, every hour, all over the country. And of course you get the "oh, yeah sure your innocent, they all say that." And if you are naive enough to think this is a fluke or exception you have just been lucky. And since the sixties the power of an individual cop has grown exponentially. They can literally get away with murder and usually do. I was kind of amazed when I got to prison to find that not everyone was an innocent victim, but many of them were. And we are supposed to have respect for the law? Drug laws are a scam, that have nothing to do with real crime. It's business, money for the cops, and keeping recreational molecules illegal has created criminal billionaires and supports organizations that are actually violent and deadly and a source of corruption on an unimaginable scale. If you are unaware of it: people have used various recreational molecules for hundreds of thousands of years, even animals use them. Yet the drugs that are legal, the main one being alcohol, are extremely toxic to every cell in your body. Alcohol is actually more harmful than heroin if the criminality of it is not considered. The war on drugs does not work, it has never worked, and it will never work, it's all just bullshit. In China were your family has to pay for the bullet that they murder you with if your are arrested for selling drugs people still sell drugs, and use them. This whole thing is evil from top to bottom. Not supernatural evil, or other imaginary ideas, but real evil: the domination of someone who does not wish to be dominated -- that's what evil is. Unfortunately too many people in the police are evil, and stupid, and blind to the fact of what they really are. They think they are fucken heroes in their twisted minds, and yes some few of them are, but mostly just people who do not really want to work. And people wonder why others hate the police. Well get a clue. Criminalization of alcohol created the first criminal millionaires, and the US drug laws have created the first criminal billionaires. All plants should be legal in their natural form. I personally no longer use recreational molecules of any kind, not alcohol, not caffeine, not refined sugar, nor any of the demonized molecules. If they were totally legal I still wouldn't use any, with the possible exception of peyote once a decade or so, but I believe that should be my decision and not some politician who has no idea at all of what things are. In PA if you are in the medical marijuana program you cannot own a firearm. But if you are an alcoholic, with a permit you can carry your concealed weapon into a bar. These "leaders" as so stupid it make you want to scream. Where is the evidence? There is loads of evidence that alcohol makes some people more prone to violence and impulsive acts. A friend of mine's son was murdered outside of a bar where he got into a argument with a legally armed drunk. Where is the evidence that marijuana use leads to violence? There isn't any. In fact quite the opposite. We are living in a culture ruled by imbeciles, and an unlikely proportion of them are high functioning psychopaths -- that's the fact. The leaders ARE the problem. Look at the present opioid problem, anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that it just happened to start at the same time that the brilliant leaders made it near impossible for may people to get pain meds from their doctor. It's all nonsense. In Switzerland they solved the drug problem by giving addicts free pharmaceutical drugs, as much as they want, in a clinical setting, with counseling and a caring therapeutic setting. Guess what. The vast majority of the crimes that were being committed to support the criminal cost of opioid addiction dried up, and most of these people were able to reenter legit society and hold down a job. In Portland they just decriminalized drugs, without support, without the necessary care and offers of therapy and guess what? It didn't work. Who could have guessed that would happen? Our country is run by blockheads and high functioning psychopaths -- that is the only reasonable explanation for what is going on. Doing the same stupid things that didn't work over and over, Like war, drug criminalization is a scam.
    1
  3854.  @Dutchman294  There are a number of reasons for that. Too many to go into here. Suggest Tesla Daily, Electrified, or Best in Tesla for factual info regarding this. They are really the only Tesla centric YouTube channels worth following. Some other are half decent, but a ghastly number are nothing but click bait fantasies. Since beginning of the year, only Tesla, and Porsche, sales have not gone down. Tesla sales have increased dramatically, Porsche's just a little bit, Ford down eight percent, which is good compared to most OEMs. The main reason Tesla is valued so high is the potential for future earnings. Musk says FSD will be here this year -- his detractors say three decades or never. If FSD is finally approved for public use, when it is an order of magnitude safer than the average driver, many people fail to be able to visualize the effects this will have on civilization. We are talking about steam engine level disruption. Many think that other companies are well on the road to being able to compete in this arena. They are not even close. Tesla may well be the most advanced company developing real-world AI. And believe me, no matter how good your imagination is, you cannot imagine the developments that will flow from this. There are loads of reasons that Tesla is valued so high. Most of which, like the powerpack installations for electric utilities and the teslabot are usually not even considered. There is no other company on earth like Tesla, with the possible exception of SpaceX, and yet the wall street elves think they can value it on outdated metrics that only apply to outdated companies like GM, BMW, and Toyota. VW, Ford, and Hyundai still have a chance to survive into the Tesla dominated age of mostly Chinese and Mexican manufactured EVs with various European and American monikers, as is now the case for many ICE cars, made in China/Mexico but GM, Ford or other misleading branding.
    1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. Entering WW1 was the stupidest thing that the USA ever did. When Russia collapsed and the revolutionaries signed a treaty with the Central Powers it freed up a million German soldiers to move to the western front. And admit it or not the soviets were now backing Germany. When this happened if the USA had not entered the war due to the subconscious manipulation of the American public via Edward Bernays Council on Foreign Relations, a public that was almost totally against the war became a public that cried for vengeance, even hung a few German Americans in the streets. If the USA had not entered the war at that point the Central Powers would have won. Had we stayed out of it, there would have been no Hitler, no WW2, no vast genocides of Jews, the disabled, gypsies, and various other scapegoat groups, no Soviet superpower, and no loss of over a hundred thousand American boys in a war the nation really had no stake in. AND the end game would have been more or less what we have in Europe today. (Remember the Germany of the time was not a Nazi Nation run by a madman but a constitutional monarchy in which political parties were limited to the legislative arena. And there is much speculation that the real reason for the insane mobilization that took place was the work on the construction of a German railroad from Central Europe into the oil fields of the Middle East, which the British controlled. On the other hand there are those Americans who benefited greatly from the war at the time. By the end of 1918, American factories had produced 3.5 million rifles, 20 million artillery rounds, 633 million pounds of smokeless gunpowder, 376 million pounds of high explosives, 21,000 airplane engines, and large amounts of poison gas.
    1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871.  @maskedmarvyl4774  His stock option argument weak? If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. There is a percentage of people who will actually make their buying decisions based on facts. However the majority of people, especially in the USA, do not use facts and stats to determine what they will purchase. We have known this since before WW1 when Edward Bernays used his uncle Sigmund Freud's discoveries about unconscious motivations to begin selling government policies and consumer goods to the general public with fantastic, almost unbelievable success. Even many Tesla owners were motivated, not by facts, but by emotions they have about Elon, and his stated purpose of prolonging human existence in the face of the inevitable extinction level event. These people, those who are in sympathy with Elon, and those who use facts to make purchase decisions will buy from Tesla, unless something drastic changes. However the majority of people who make their purchase decisions based on unconscious motivations and desires may well not. If you want to sell to these people, you vastly increase your chances by the kind of apparently irrelevant ads like the Polestar ad you reviewed here. The ad basically said nothing except, "We are not Elon Musk." However it is of note that after this ad, while all EV, and EV related stocks went south, Gores Guggenheim, Inc. stock moved from $10 to $13 per share and settles at around $12.25 for the week. About a 22% increase. As you know Gores Guggenheim, Inc. is the company that will merge with Polestar this spring. So you can buy stock in PoleStar right now by buying Gores Guggenheim as you reported weeks ago. I would say the ad was very successful, it increased the companies value by more than twenty percent, as nothing new happened during this time but the SB ad. If you really don't think that emotionally based advertising works you should take a look at the wonderful documentary The Century of the Self, which will explain in a most entertaining manner just what is really going on and how modern advertising and mass motivation uses the psychological weaknesses in people to sell them stuff they don't need or really even want. Like entering WW 1 for instance. Here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnPmg0R1M04&t=1356s
    1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. It's the people not the system Mat. If you think you would be better off in a union working for GM or Ford, than to be working for Tesla and taking advantage of the employee stock program -- think again. Time for the woke folk to wake the fuck up and put down the crack pipe of commercial media lies. The facts: The average salary paid to an employee working at Tesla is $110,192. Tesla pay is based on an employee’s position and department. The product team earns an average salary of $201,032. This is the highest salary figure of any department at Tesla. The lowest earning department at Tesla is admin. It is estimated a receptionist earns $38,015 annually. Just to make it easier lets say a salary of 40k. Because Mary is a real looker, is charming and has a sexy voice so she was able to get 40k as a salary, though she never got any raises to make up for it. That means that every six months she is able to buy three thousand dollars of Tesla stock at a discount of 15% off the lower price of the closing price of day one and day 180 each six months. An example: Mary works as the lowest paid position in Tesla. She is a receptionist. She has been working for five years and ten months. She started work on Feb 1, 2019. Tesla closed at $21.33. On August 1st 2019 it closed at $15.04. She was then able to spend $3,000 on 234.5 shares of Tesla at a employee discount price of 12.79. On Feb 1st 2020, she was again eligible to buy three thousand dollars of stock. Tesla closes at $44.53, but she is still able to buy 234.5 more shares at $12.79. Mary now has 469 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2020 Tesla closed at $166.11. But Mary was still able to buy $3000 dollars of Tesla at $37.85 (79.25 shares). Mary now has 548.25 shares of Tesla. Thirty days later Tesla stock splits 5 - 1. Mary now has 2,741.25 shares of Tesla stock. On February 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $225.17. But Mary is still able to buy it for $141.19. Mary now has 2,762.5 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2021 Tesla closes at $245.25, but Mary is able to purchase it for 208.46. She spends her $3000 and Mary now has 2,776.89 shares of Tesla. On February 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $290.14. But Mary is able to buy it at $246.62. Mary now has 2,789.05 shares of Tesla stock. On August 1st 2022 Tesla closed at $275.61. Mary's price is $234.27. Mary now has 2,801.85 shares of Tesla. Twenty three days later Tesla stock splits 3-1. Mary now has 8,405.56 shares of Tesla. . . . Are you beginning to understand what nonsense you are spewing? It's OK I know you can't admit because you are steeped in lies and have to make meaningless "virtue" signaling to the rest of the puddin' head mob. On February 1st 2023 Tesla closes at $205.71. Mary's price is $176.85. She now owns 8,422.52 shares of Tesla. On August 1st 2023 Tesla closed at $258.08 Mary is still able to buy at $176.85 Mary now owns 8,439.47 shares of Tesla stock. Mary has been working for almost six years. Her salary totals $232,000. Her Tesla stock is worth $2,088,784.96. She became a millionaire working as a receptionist. Conclusion: Not what you thought -- aye Elroy?
    1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1