Comments by "The Zero Line" (@The_ZeroLine) on "Russia using 40-year-old rockets u0026 the best books about the invasion | Ukraine: The Latest | Podcast" video.

  1. It is strategic. There is only one other bridge that can be used to safely transport supplies to Crimea.
    2
  2. Me too. But what’s ironic is that I listened to the entire speech it came from and the interpreter was actually very bad. So, it was quite awkward. However, that one line came out so powerfully.
    2
  3. I also like how quickly they dropped the Liz Truss audio bites and went back to the Boris Johnson ones, which sounded so much better.
    2
  4. Before they were in NATO, maybe they’d have dared to invade a tiny Baltic state, but now? It’s delusional to think they’ll try to invade anyone to the west in the next decade.
    1
  5. Certainly, there’s been no excuse for the West not getting Ukraine comprehensive air defense faster. However, while I’d love to see Moscow turned to glass, I believe if it looked like everything was going to come crashing down all at once for Putin, he’d try to use nukes. So, as awful as it’s been, steadily eroding Putin’s support among both the people and his own circle so that if and when he tries to do something crazy his chain of command will break. Giving Ukraine F-16s, tomahawk missiles, ATACMS, etc. would see Putin running out of options in mere hours and he’d try something crazy. And there are still enough crazy generals that it might be allowed to happen.
    1
  6. Probably an error. They treat the YT uploads as afterthoughts.
    1
  7.  @thetruth9874  The Kerch can be fixed, but the limitation on supply lines during that time has been devastating let alone the damage to Russia’s narrative and sense of impunity.
    1
  8. Yes, China can’t even comfortably operate their submarines. They’re hemmed in by the shallow waters around their coast.
    1
  9. If we’re going to blame the UK, for something it should be something accurate like allowing hundreds of billions of stolen Russian money to pour into their country, not all this BS about the BM. The Budapest Memorandum (not “Agreement”) was never a formal security agreement. Also, the Ukraine would have never been able to operate those nuclear weapons. Their own nuclear operators refused to even operate the nuclear silos. They didn’t have the codes either to operate them. And all those nukes were dismantled. Add to the fact that most Ukrainians wanted them off their soil and that the cost of the operations was enormously expensive and Ukraine knew this and actually got compensated instead of having to pay to safely store decaying and inoperable ICBMs.
    1
  10. Shells. Not rockets, nincompoop. And they’re not. Listen to the endless amount of intercepted Russian calls where soldiers complain their artillery hits nothing and when they do, it’s their own side.
    1
  11. lmao, Mr. Potato’s haircut. Seriously, dude lived in Switzerland. How inbred must he be to sport that hairdo 💇‍♂️?
    1
  12. It was an almost new bridge. New bridges don’t just collapse like that, unless it’s China where they basically use the worst materials, have zero safety standards, corrupt officials substitute sawdust for wood to pocket the $, etc.
    1
  13.  @Jazzisa311  Yeah, he definitely found his niche with Ukraine. Boris was not a particularly lovely man nor were his policies, but it still irritates me that people compare him to Trump. The gap between the two is like Stalin and Gorbachev.
    1
  14.  @Jolluna  We need some sort of music remix featuring samples of the Boris and Zelensky quotes. Zelensky speaks pretty solid English actually. I wonder if by the end of the war we’ll hear him making more English language speeches.
    1
  15. Many generals have said that, but yes, always good to leave your opponent somewhere to rout.
    1