Comments by "The Zero Line" (@The_ZeroLine) on "180,000 Russian Casualties Estimated" video.

  1. A note on the casualties data: Ukrainian casualties are 65% more likely to survive than 🇷🇺 casualties. So, the % gap of KIA among casualties is large. This is due to a number of factors including the fact that Ukrainian soldiers have modern western medical packs and tourniquets, Ukrainian soldiers are much closer to medical service than Russians, Ukraine has more medics per soldier, Russian evac logistics are ATROCIOUS, Russian casualties are more likely to be abandoned and so on. Also, 🇷🇺 has an extreme number of MIAs, which would not be included in leaked data.
    8
  2. A note on the Bradleys: they’re all from PPS (pre-positioned stock), which are all located in Europe + ODS models. So, 🇺🇦 is getting one of the best versions + are getting the depleted uranium rounds.
    4
  3. The “they haven’t submitted the paperwork” is something I’ve hundreds of Russian bots saying.
    2
  4. Per the casualties, Ukrainian casualties are more than 65% more likely to survive than Russian casualties. So, the KIA proportion of casualties is nowhere close. Also, the Russians have an extreme number of MIAs, which would not be included in leaked data.
    1
  5.  @ingorenner5210  Maybe the hundreds of CPD members who the Russians have kompromat on, the fact that the SPD are East Germans who identify closely with Russian values and above all by 100x, the hope that they will be able to resume friendly energy trading after the war.
    1
  6.  @1776stubborn  I mean that number is so absurdly low that they KNOW the West won’t believe it. It’s targeted for internal audiences, not us. Secondly, 500-600 were killed in a single strike on New Year’s day. So, 12,000 is hilarious. The report also seems credible because they report a huge amount of Ukrainian losses. Ukraine would never issue that number of losses. So, you know it’s not from some Western propaganda source.
    1
  7.  @geraldorford  Except to call him an architect or anything is giving him too much credit. Might more appropriate to say he’s like the short order cook of a recipe for disaster.
    1