Comments by "hongry life" (@hongry-life) on "Ukraine, FBI u0026 Twitter. Crimea, Fabergé line. Rasmussen, NATO plan. Baerbock, Brazil beans. U/1" video.

  1. True. And only breaking the law is a barrier, nothing else can hinder free speech.
    2
  2. It is a try to get the WWIII starting that they apparently want so bad no matter the cost (of human lives), but it is illegal none the less (troops as well as new treaties during the already started armed conflict) and will not hold before any tribunal. If NATO or countries will start WWIII on own merit then it will be an enormous bloodshed of NATO soldiers and/or soldiers of the participating countries + civilian collateral damaga, terrorism etc. It is of course democratic if they let the people decide on that, to sacrifice lots of their male population's lives and collateral civilian lives (poverty, hunger, death, like all happened in WWII as well) for the cause of the set goals of some oligarchs suffering from power lust and greed and control freak disorder.
    1
  3. I still do not know why the collective west is so focused on destroying a foreign country. I would think there is enough to restore in the own countries, which are in tatters.
    1
  4. I often see on the tracker on the Romanian coast (Constanta) USA (reconnaissance) planes and Black Hawk choppers. Maybe they do the exploring of attacking Crimea from there. Yesterday a Boeing 767 from Washingtown arrived at Constanta airport.
    1
  5. Sending troops is a declaration of war, isn't it? The people have no say in the institutions outside of their own chosen governments ruling over them, so that is fascist in nature, not democracy.
    1
  6. There cannot be signed new treaties during the armed conflict that allow countries to participate in the conflict. That is illegal.
    1