Comments by "hongry life" (@hongry-life) on "Velyka Novosilka Is Falling🎖 79th Brigade Is Caught In Cauldron🔥 Military Summary For 2024.11.24" video.

@imrussian6638 Sometimes it's the speed that gives it away. People cannot read that fast and really cannot delete it multiple times within a nanosecond. There are automatic readers en censorers as I think. Yes, people can also target certain accounts and certain opinions. it's noticable. But they show slower response. I alwats find it funny when these comments like this one without a forbidden opinion stay and political opinions get removed right away. So obvious.
5
@benjammin3381 Targeted.
3
@kontrollierteschaos4068 AI including the bots of the system. A comment DOA means that the censorer reads beyond human capabilities. I can notice when the AI/computer/bot does it. It also won't let go to censor the same, and that is also different from human approach.
2
AI doesn't exist btw i.m.o. only dumb but fast computer calculation speed. There is no intelligence to detect in the automatic responses or acts.
1
@fryertuck6496 I even know some bots accounts by name that do it. Sometimes it's very obvious, can even be tested. They answer polite/robotic/ / too extensive in paragrapghs/well composed but limited in their information possibilities/options when being confronted, always ignoring certain things. Not human like, I learned to recognize patterns. Pity (or good) that they are programmed with too limited information, for propaganda purpose, so they cannot learn anything. So it is not 'AI' i.m.o.
1
@imrussian6638 The targeting is noticeable when 2 people write the same but one stays and one gets removed. I somtimes try it and test it and I think that the targeting of certain accounts is real.
1
@imrussian6638 At a different channel people can talk very freely because they decided to replace one forbidden word with a different word that everyone knows what it stands for, because it is a short description of the forbidden and targeted word (now even shortened into only one word as well). Also funny, because deep discussions are possible with no bot censoring the talks whatsoever (unless people use another forbidden word).
1
I would believe AI to exist if the robots are not censored and not censor even themselves and therefor could have real intelligent discourses, showing the thought processes with good argumentation and the capability to have insight in their wrong thought processes (and not act robotically unrealisticly arrogant). But that is not the case so far. If there is one, it cannot learn by the limitatiosn put upon it and therefor acts and talks like a spoiled toddler. And that is how I think that all media messages with talks of politicians who talk like babies like that (spoiled bully toddlers) are in fact not real but computer productions (and that is not worth to call AI because of the obvious limited undeveloped 'childish' thought processes). It's best to ditch most of the media productions, because they are not a representation of reality, all constructed, never spontaneous, always with so called crises actors or CGI characters. I myself learned within a few years to observe the footages and texts very well and see the anomalies of editing and falsehood by omission of facts, robotic repetitiveness etc.
1
Try to find iin media messages in the footage what the text suggests for some time for example (like a m ur der or a sh oo tin g etc. You will not find it EVER. That specific fact is never shown. It is a tactic of suggestion but the suggested things are not there. Try it.
1