Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "ITN Archive" channel.

After seeing how unhinged this guy is, I now understand why the Turks invaded the island when he took over lol Seriously this guy had to go.
9
@rustshoo5068 Did you really just say the British were a stabilizing presence? You can't possibly be serious.
6
@georgestamatakis697 Just call them both war criminals and ethnic cleansers and get it over with. Sitting there arguing because one of them wanted a slow ethnic cleansing and the other wanted it done quickly. Imagine fighting over that detail of genocide. Either way both got what was coming to them.
6
@Pyrrhic537 Still doesn't change the fact he was a mass murder like Netanyahu no? Yes their methods may have been different but I fail to see how that distinction changes the over arching premise.
4
@angelman93 In the same way the world supposedly condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine and stayed completely silent when my country America invaded Iraq? Is that the international system of judgement you speak of? Using that system as the arbiter of what is right and what is wrong is nothing short of insanity. If your position is right, you should be able to demonstrate it without appealing to the authority of a system everyone knows is corrupt to it's bone. My point isn't about being fair, my point was about pointing out the reality of a situation. It isn't that complicated.
4
@Κώστας-τ9μ If only their military was brave enough to actually use those tanks against an army. I mean sure they made full use of them when attacking civilians. But when men with guns showed up, magically there was no one left to man those tanks.
3
@miltiadiskyvernitis The fact you're triggered is quite obvious. When your cognitive dissonance is so out of control that the only way to keep your world view is to label facts as "stupid" says a lot no? What happened happened. Your emotion won't change that reality.
3
Well none of that matters anymore. The island has been at peace for a long time now. So how ever it worked out, it worked out for the best.
3
@angelman93 You're right, Turkey wasn't the one who helped orchestrate a coup on the island which led to all this chaos. Not good to compare.
3
@Κώστας-τ9μ You might want to read the argument again. You're trying to agree with Angel's point of view yet make statements contradicting his point of view. It might make sense to actually understand the argument you were trying to enter. Why are people so irrational on this specific issue I'll never understand. Again maybe it is the water there?
3
@gottmintuns813. You are 100% correct. (About the Southern half of the island)
2
@Stellarionas I'm not sure what world you live in but there is most certainly a northern and southern half. If there wasn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation. You do realize there is a difficult between what is and what you want to be.
2
@Stellarionas In such a situation I'd imagine that would make you extremely bias and a lot more likely to fall into cognitive dissonance when it comes to these issues. No one needs to pretend anything, if you can't debate the facts at face value, why have a meltdown over it? You literally couldn't tackle anything I said. Claiming you know more because of where you live isn't an argument.
2
@elgee6202 If you want to get that technical. The Cypriots aren't really "Greek Cypriots" either. They were conquered and Hellenized by the Greeks. If you don't believe me, go take a DNA test. In fact before you do just look around sometime. If I take your average Greek Cypriot and throw him in the middle of Bagdad, no one would notice because he'd look just like everyone around him. Do the math.
2
@darryl_Francis. While I agree with you that there is probably a very special place in hell for Kissinger, the record is pretty clear on the fact he literally tried every trick in the book to stop the Turks from intervening on the island.
2
@wildrose1920 So according to your math 95+8=100? Honestly do you not even pay attention to some of the nonsense you're posting here? lol
2
@wildrose1920 The decision to invade was taken days if not weeks before that. Do a little research for god's sake. If you're too lazy to do that, use some common sense. You really believe the Turks could mobilize an amphibious assault like that on 24 hours notice?
2
50 years later there is still no violence on that island.
2
@mikem8211 Or maybe he was just a genocidal maniac.
1
@gottmituns813 That is your argument? Seriously? Why not just put up a white flag and surrender instead.
1
@Stellarionas Again telling someone they know nothing isn't an argument. Do you actually have an argument? Or is your position so weak that all you can do is scream insults? Why am I coming across so many overly emotional psychos on this issue? Is it something in the water there that makes you guys so irrational? No wonder you got invaded lol Hell at this rate it will probably happen again. Being irrational and overly irrational can lead any society into doing some really stupid things. Things that get them invaded
1
@Stellarionas You actually started zero facts in your earlier post. You simply make facts without any concrete reasons as to why they are true. Not to mention you don't even try to tackle the facts presented. Remember facts don't care about your feelings bro. I don't need to know it all to know what you're saying is BS. As far as crying, the people on your insane side of the debate are doing all the crying no? Imagine going full blown ethnic cleansing Hitler on a small minority and then freaking out when people point out that you can't play the victim after that. That is exactly what you're doing.
1
@mrj4990 Are you referring to places where someone helped a group of people from coming under British control? Yes, that would have kept them out of those dark ages.
1
@EPICFAILKING1 See when you make an argument you really need to be super careful not to give yourself away too easily. You literally just said the British took Cyprus for their mistreatment of the Greeks on the island? That is not only false, it is demonstrably false. The Brits leased the island at a huge price (fighting Russia in a war in return.) They were willing to pay this price because of how strategic the island was and it's proximity to the Suez Canal which was the lifeline of the British economy. They then later reneged on their lease deal and just kept the island. The fact you'd even be ridiculous enough, or stupid enough to utter the phrase "They took it to protect the Greeks" just shows that you're terrible at crafting false narratives, you're a liar or you simply have no idea what in the world you're talking about. You literally might want to sit here and explaining flying pigs to me, that would be more believable than the garbage you're peddling. If anyone needs to cope it is you and your fantastical talking points.
1
@Darryl_Francis You do realize you're projecting right? Literally speaking on behalf of a majority group who went full blown hitler on a small minority group on an island and then played the victim card.
1
@miltiadiskyvernitis The fact I do might have something to do with the fact you're so triggered you're not even able to make an argument against what I'm saying.
1
@Κώστας-τ9μ I literally have no idea what you're trying to say.
1
@Pyrrhic537 What would you call trigger happy? A bunch of guys who's homes were stolen, lands taken, their children slaughtered and the survivors stuffed into concentration camps fighting back is "trigger happy" Interesting.
1
@wildrose1920 So you don't think a majority on an island going full ham to ethnically cleanse a minority had anything to do with that conflict? Nothing at all?
1