General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

William Davis
RealLifeLore
comments

Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "RealLifeLore" channel.

@csdffwgdfgfdf If that was the case they'd have great relations with all the gulf nations. They don't.
757
@jej_x There are a lot of them but I'll mention one of them. His bit about conflict in Libya. He claimed Turkey was at odds with Nato/the West because they supported the GNA. While France and Greece supported the rebels in Bengazi. Well what he failed to mention was that every single other country in Nato was also supporting the GNA. France and Greece were actually the outliers in joining the same side Russia is on. Also throughout the entire video he went through pains to mention how something was "internationally recognized" or in line with UN rules. Yet when talking about Libya he oddly didn't mention that the GNA government in that conflict is the internationally recognized government of Libya and the people they're fighting is an illegal rebel group led by a warlord. I could write a damned book on how many false narratives this guy draws in this video. Normally in a youtube video you'd just assume it's a simple mistake but he does it so often and so egregiously that it's fairly obvious that for what ever reason he was looking to mislead his viewers. When you compare the false information in a video like this to the type of content like Kraut puts out for example. It is like night and day. People call media fake news, what would we call a youtube video filled with false narratives and false information?
49
@user-nr6my3rw4m Basically without which the French economy would implode.
36
It's funny how on every other matter in this video they go out of their way to scream UN endorsed or internationally recognized. Yet when talking about Libya they just magically leave that part out of it. I literally lost all respect for this channel after watching this.
25
@ommsterlitz1805 1. They weren't given independence. They took it. France never "gave" anyone independence. 2. What happened to them after was orchestrated. They were the first nation in that region to fight a war and win against a colonizer. The fear of the colonizers was that the movement would spread, so they had to be severely punished and punished for a very long time. A small Island surrounded colonies owned by nations who want to punish them, if you know anything about how economics work, it won't take a rocket scientist to figure out how that would end for them. But this isn't 100 years ago and France today is a 3rd rate power. They aren't going to be able to punish nations like they used to who try to stop France from robbing them. All they really have left is to funnel tons of money to terrorist organizations and give them operational intelligence to cause as much chaos as possible in these nations (which is what they're doing now.) Even that can only last so long. Without these vast colonies from which France extracts untold amounts of wealth from, France will collapse. Why do you think their ruling elite are losing their god damned minds right now.
23
@RealLifeLore How about the false narratives you drew by omitting key facts?
19
This is more entertainment than actual reality. Half of the narratives he crafted were outright wrong.
14
@b3arwithm3 That's all well and good and something most know. Although I fail to understand how that has anything to do with the comment I was responding to. Also groups of people not liking each other and having a tribal mentality isn't simply 15 century, it's a trait that is alive and well in most places. And the few places where it isn't present, it's just beneath the surface and can resurface at anytime. This is a human trait stemming from the way we've evolved. The reason it's worse in the middle east probably has a lot to do with the genetic damage from thousands of years of inbreeding.
13
@b3arwithm3 Not sure how that changes the fact the guy making the comment I responded dead wrong.
10
@coolandinteresteing How does that have anything to do with the point being made Mr. Aarash?
9
@Ass_of_Amalek The entire video was sloppy. Just drawing false narratives after false narratives.
9
@S3aCa1mRa1n One could easily turn that around on you as well no? You'll opine about a genocide from well over 100 years ago. yet completely ignore a huge ethnic cleansing attempt on an Island hwere the majority tried to exterminate the minority which didn't happen that long ago. Where some of the criminals are still alive. But let me guess. "It never happened" right?
8
@Labistouket That region and it's people were there long before France even existed. And they'll be there well after France as a nation no longer exists. (Which will probably come sooner than you'd like to think) These regions will eventually recover from the untold amounts of damage France did to them. Not sure France in the long term will recover from it's current slide into irrelevancy though.
8
@Justsome462. His take on the Libya situation was quite ridiculous. The entire video he went to pains to use words like "internationally recognized this, UN recognized that. Then when talking about Libya he failed to mention the GNA was actually the internationally recognized government of Libya. He made it seem liek Turkey took sides against Nato states when the reality was the vast majority of Nato was also backing the GNA. France and Greece were the outsiders on that issue backing the illegal militia groups along with Russia. Again really really terrible video.
8
@extragoogleaccount6061 Yes a lot of the narratives he drew about motivating forces are completely and utterly false. At least to anyone who has followed this country in depth for the past few decades. Especially his bit about why they invaded Cyprus.
7
@Ancientloser, The western view that Kurds are some monolith is pretty ridiculous when put under a microscope. The odd part that romanticized view can't get around is that about 10 years ago more Kurds voted for the AKP than they did for the "Kurdish" party.
7
@aland.9060 This is true. Yes Turkey is a problem for Nato but not really for the reasons this guy tried to push.
7
@Ashnagarr618 (Yes, i am. ) Obvious considering how irrational and emotional you are on this topic. (1) France was a world superpower even before colonisation.) Doesn't change the their economy will collapse without pillaging Africa) (2) France had its industrial revolution before colonisation of Africa.) ( 3) Africa in its globality doesn't even represent 0.5% of France External Income and Commercial relations, and most of those 0.5% are in the maghreb region.) This means absolutely nothing because it takes take into account the hundreds of billions of dollars of resources stolen from these nations to power France's industry. Perhaps if France paid market value for all these things the GDP of these nations would be a lot higher. Your argument makes absolutely zero sense when put under a microscope. (4) France is losing money in Africa, because we give too much international aid in several forms (Health, Economic help, military help etc). Currently, Africa cost more than it brings back.) If France was losing money in Africa, your banking elites and political elites wouldn't' be absolutely losing their minds about being pushed out of Africa. Economic help? What economic help? You mean bribes paid out so you can continue to steal resources? Or the money and aid given tot he terrorist organizations to destabilize governments who don't do the regime in Paris's bidding? Chirac said it best "without Africa our economy would collapse" (France neo-colonisation is a myth maintened by worthless individuals to explain easily why their countries are failures, and by russia and china to facilitate their projects in Africa.) France's neo-colonization is not only a fact, it is an easily demonstrable fact. You claiming it is a myth against all the mountains of evidence the rest of the world understands isn't going to change that. It is akin to you claiming gravity is a myth and feeling good about yourself afterward. The fact you think it is only people from these affected nations who understand what France is doing and has done shows how delusional you really are. I come from a nation which is 100x more powerful than France, so much more powerful than France to a point the world sees France as our lap dog. So how is it that I know of France's dealings in France then, if it is only a myth made up by people from crap nations to rationalize their misery? Your level of cognitive dissonance is quite scary. It is one thing to be from a nation who's government is pure evil but it is another to actually trick yourself into thinking this evil is good. But then again you are French, things that apply to most people don't really apply to you guys. I'm actually shocked you didn't just surrender to me immediately as soon as this debate started, considering you guys are famous for that.
7
@Ashnagarr618 You aren't taking into account the vast numbers of natural resources being pillaged by France from Africa which is fueling French industry. Or most of the stolen Uranium from Africa used to power France's nuclear energy. Nor are you taking into account the fact France forces these nations to keep all their currency in the French banking system to the tune of nearly 500 billion dollars. Which France gets a handsome interest on and kicks back a small some to these colonies. As far as what I said being true or not. It isn't me who came up with this. A French president of yesterday actually said that without Africa the French economy would collapse. You should look into who said it, when they said it and why they said it. Don't be a slave to your emotions and cognitive dissonance.
6
@BanCommies_Fascists They both wield absolute power and both don't really have a need to have a mandate from the public. The only real difference is how they attain power. Once they're in power, there is zero difference.
5
It is a dying and irrelevant language. No point really.
5
Why would they even want to do such a thing? Too many languages, too many cultures to adapt into such a thing. It would make more sense for them to start an economic union though. Which I guess they're slowly working on. It is called BRICS.
5
@Dexorfs That is a good question, no the video isn't a hit piece on Turkey. However there are some really really strange things that can't be caulked up to mistakes.
4
@blackhole606 Lots and lots of spending.
4
@geekosa63 You see this is where you fail yourself. It isn't a matter of what I like or don't like. I personally have no horse in this race and wouldn't care either way. But I can see how you would think that, because you seem to look at things through the prism of what you like and want to be true and then cherry pick everything according to that. Your argument is immaterial and semantic in nature. Fact is the people living there now, were there well before France ever got there. Fact is they'll be living there and doing just fine when France no longer even exists. The fact France through their murder and brutality might have changed size and shape of a border or two is again irrelevant to all that. It seems to me this is an extremely emotional topic for you to a point it is impossible for you to be rational. Me, I am not French, nor am I from north Arica. I could care less how things played out or will play out. What I do care about though are facts and reality. Also this idea you're hiding behind about schools and roads is absolute BS a criminal tells himself to try to clear his dirty conscience. You can't slaughter people like cattle in a genocide on par with what the Nazis did and then claim a school or a road makes up for that. Absolutely not. You'd have to be completely and utterly insane to even attempt to make an argument like that. But then again collapsing civilizations do tend to bring out the most insane traits in people, so if you are French it makes sense.
4
@jxjason9 Except for the fact both sides have coasts on the Persian gulf no? Maybe one day both sides will stop acting like dogs and learn to get along?
3
@Kingace6186. Unlike this channel Kraut actually does his homework and doesn't peddle false narratives and lazy research. Kraut's work is always amazing.
3
@playwars3037 Threatening to do something is one thing, actually doing something is another. France has been far more wreckless in going against Nato's wishes (in action) than Turkey has. Nato officially backed the officially internationally recognized government in Libya (GNA). France decided to join Russia and back the warlord in that conflict. Sending massive amounts of arms. Making claims is one thing, action is another. Yes the comparison is a bit fallacious, as Turkey hasn't nearly taken concrete actions against the group nearly as much as France has. Not that it really matters, anytime France takes action which Washington is not happy with it always ends up blowing up in France's face anyway.
3
If we dug deep we can find mistakes a lot worse than Bulgaria and Romania not being members of the USSR lol
3
@eavocado5890pppj So you want us to believe Qatar is a democracy? Seriously?
2
@eavocado5890pppj I'm not sure if there is anything semi democratic about having an absolute ruler. But okay, play all the semantics you want. Won't change the reality of the situation. Of course Qatar is freer than Greece. Greece isnt' even a real country, it's a banana republic where it's media is essentially owned by foreign corporate interests and is not free in the least bit. That is like claiming you're fast because you're faster than a guy in a wheelchair.
2
@kingace6186 Yup I've been a fan for a while. This one was a hugeeee hiccup. I'm completely turned off.
2
@DoofyGilmore1299 Yea it's a hodge podge of groups from central Asia. But if you're DNA is not from that region, it's hard to claim you're Turkic. Also if Turkism is all about culture. Than Turkey is certainly not Turkic at all. Their culture is more similar to Persian, Arabic and Greek cultures than to Turkic cultures.
2
Difference is colonial powers like France have no ability to colonize Kazakhstan.
2
France essentially uses an uptick in terrorism to continue it's foothold in the Sahel. Anytime any government in this region takes steps to get away from French influence you generally see a huge spike in terror attacks. So it is going to be very painful as these nations completely get rid of French influence. France is essentially going to help put these terror attacks into overdrive. But eventually they're going to realize they can't colonize these areas any longer and will eventually give up. Then and only then will some of these nations finally get a breather from that French boot that has been on their throat for 100s of years.
2
@Michael_the_Drunkard Neither, I'm just allergic to bullsh!t. I also have an afinity for reality which you seem to be allergic too.
2
@dozwhald6546 No EU member has the military capability to carry out an attack that far from it's shores. Everything will depend on how Washington reacts. Everything else is window dressing. Without Washington there is nothing any EU state can do about it.
2
@taurohkea2169 Yes but this channel claimed they were going against Nato by doing it because 2 Nato members were on the other side. The reality is every other Nato member was supporting the GNA, like Turkey. It was France and Greece who joined Russia in supporting the warlord against the wishes of the vast majority of Nato. But the way he crafted the video made it look like the opposite. Terrible video.
2
@DevoutSkeptic Unlikely.
2
@MrTimeless101 So you're 'saying it will be like our government here in America? You're probably right.
2
Yup that map he showed of the Sevres treaty was so off it's not even funny.
2
@cboisvert2 Meh that is a debate which could be had.
2
@seanmarshall5463 I'd imagine a lot of that stems from the massive genetic damage the people of the region have from inbreeding. Low IQ, low impulse control=chaos.
1
@nineten9011 It was, in the royal families. Which is why all the royal families lost their minds leading to insane wars. The general public was never big on inbreeding. Not just Europe but the vast majority of the planet figured out that cousins having children causes genetic damage. Only in very select places people havent' figured this out. The rest of the world has known for 1000s of years.
1
isiknowledge Which gulf do you think of when you hear Gulf Arab nations?
1
@Arman_opiran Are you in the habit of asking questions you already know the answers to? Why are you Arabs so prone to emotional meltdowns over the smallest irrelevant little things?
1
@Arman_opiran You're all inbred middle easterners no who act the same no? Serious question Arman (considering the way you're acting) Were your parents cousins?
1
@earthwizz I'm glad they're finally seeing the light that conflict isn't good. However it isn't stopping the war in this comments section between the two groups of inbreds.
1
@sim-sam The word dictator isn't a subjective term you can apply as you please. The word has a clear definition.
1
@Zorbakozak Both. Obviously you can't pin something as complex as society behavior on one thing alone. But there is more than enough evidence that inbreeding plays it's part, if not an outsized part.
1
They use your tax money to do what ever is necessary to ensure that "their man" is in charge of these nations. Then they proceed to strip these nations of their natural resources which helps French industry. Once someone in power does anything to slow down how fast France is stealing these natural resources, then your tax money goes into funding the terror groups in these nations to help destabilize the governments France wants out. Now you as a French citizen might be a bit shocked by all this. But you must also understand that your standard of living simply cannot stay where it is without your government robbing Africa blind year after year. Now that France is slowly being kicked out of this region country by country, well your elites are in complete and utter panic.
1
@a.tartist For anyone who's looked into this issue. I'm going to have to say you're right. But it isn't mostly Kurds Armenians and Greeks. It is essentially indigenous Anatolians. Even the ones who spoke Greek, weren't really Greek. They were invaded by Greeks and assimilated into Greek culture, just like they were later invaded by Turkic tribes and assimilated into Turkic culture. It would make more sense to simply all them indigenous Anatolians. That is where all the DNA evidence points. I understand many people from Turkey get triggered over this but it is the reality. But on the flip side this will also trigger the Greeks on a deeper level. When they tell these people "go back to central Asia you invaders" Well that claim is BS too. Considering most of them are simply indigenous people who've taken on a new language. Hard to tell people to go back to a place they were never from in the first place. Greeks and people in Turkey<----- Get triggered over facts. Reality triggers the fairytales both have been hearing and telling for 100 years.
1
@DoofyGilmore1299 There are plenty of those sources for the DNA mapping of every country. Using one source seems to paint a different picture. Even if your source (which I've looked at before) is 100% correct it still shows the majority of the DNA in the country is indigenous Anatolian. There are other studies which show the Turkic DNA in Turkey as low as 15%. It is anywhere between 15% and 35%. It makes sense to simply split the difference in the various studies. So my estimate is probably some where near 25%. But again people in Turkey claiming most of them are descendants of powerful horsemen from central Asia is insane. The Greeks claiming these people should go back to central Asia (when most of them are indigenous) is just as insane.
1
@DoofyGilmore1299 That is a very subjective point of view. How much time have you spent with other Turkic groups like the Turkic groups of the North Caucasus or from Central Asia? My mother's side of the family are from an old Kipchak Turkic group and I've spent a lot of time in Turkey. The culture and behavior of these two groups of people are completely different. Again people in Turkey have a culture more similar to Persians, Arabs and Greeks. Especially if you go into inner Anatolia you see the vast difference between them and Turkic groups. Let me ask you something, how many old Turkic groups of people do you know of that inbreed? None. In Anatolia people inbreed like it's nobody's business. Inbreeding in all Turkic societies is something that would get you killed for even attempting to do. In Turkey it is seen as completely natural. Good luck trying to marry your uncles daughter in a place like Uzbekistan/Kazakhstan or in the North Caucasus. Your own dad would murder you. In places like Konya, Ankara, Kayseri and hundreds of other cities behavior like this is considered normal. So please don't tell me how "similar" the culture is. Forget similar it is quite alien.
1
@CoffeeKitty. Some else already asked me that question and I answered it in a pretty long post. Please scroll up
1
@kko5779 He meant to say plutonium. Kazakhstan exports over 40% of the world's Uranium which is used to make plutonium. Very vital resource considering the speed at which nations are putting up nuclear power plants. It is essentially the oil of the future.
1
@LastZepp1 Agreed.
1
@duhface8066 Then that same British colonialism set up a situation where Palestinians were thrown into concentration camps for the next 75 years. Had their land systematically stolen and their children slaughtered every once in a while in what Israel calls "mowing the lawn." Yea ethnic cleansing, concentration camps, brutality and mass murder is such a great thing the British occupation bestowed upon the Palestinians. I'm sure they are very grateful. ARE YOU INSANE?
1
@blackhole606 I don't think you actually understand how this works. If I walk into your house and steal something from your house, what I stole doesn't go on my balance sheet. If you look at how many resources France extracts from Africa (for nearly free) which they then use to fuel their industry, the figures are staggering. France forces a lot of these nations to hold all their reserve money in France. The amount of money France earns from that in interest alone is simply staggering. 500 billion is simply an estimate as to how much France benefits/steals from Africa each other. The fact it is such a huge number and seems to be insane, shows you just how dependent France's entire way of life is on stealing from Africa. Their entire financial structure is based on it and without which would immediately collapse. Which is why they're willing to go to war to keep it.
1
@Keep_Intentions_Pure Your nation's decisions have an element of insanity and an element of rationality. What they're doing now is quite rational. What they did about 10 years ago when they helped destroy Syria was irrational.
1
@Da__goat I still fail to realize how that counteracts the point I made. But if you feel the need to go punch someone in the mouth, have it at bro.
1
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 They were only allies when it suited their interests to be allies and will be again if it ever suits their interests again. The reality is they hate each other's guts completely and totally. I'd imagine a lot of that is the bad blood left over from when France tried to turn them into their many colonies and failed. It was a really bloody affair keeping France out of their country.
1
@DANIJELJOIVIC4971 Outside of the west and where the globalist media dominates. The rest of the world knows about this all too well. Ask anyone in the street in most nations what they think the French do in Africa. They'll have an immediate answer for you. Down to cab drivers. It is no secret that France is robbing Africa blind and using terrorism as the "stick" when they get out of line.
1
@pikapi6993 100s of thousands of people get wrecked. You say "Nothing to see here" 20 people die you scream "ethnic cleansing." Your level of irrationality is amusing. Nice lol
1
@notaPrimate Actually this was a time when they had the most space they've pretty much ever had. The more the govt cracks down on them the more votes they get, that is kind of how that tends to work. So no, that really wasnt' the reason.
1
@notaPrimate Really? Do you believe there were elections pre 1923? Seriously?
1
@teloneys2845 Try reading it again then.
1
@Psychorabbit, Article 5 would probably not be triggered. Individual nations would be free to act as they please, just not under the Nato umbrella.
1
@Da__goat There isn't much they can do with those carriers. Again they don't have the logistical capabilities to fight a real army too far from their shores. They know it too. Hell France couldnt' even handle a terrible Libyan army by themselves and America had to step in and finish the job. Those aircraft carriers are window dressing. Especially Spain, it isn't even a real aircraft carrier.
1
@captainvanisher988 No EU nation has the military capabilities to launch an offensive operation like that. They don't even have the landing boats necessary for an amphibious assault on that scale. It's a pipe dream. Not to mention no EU nation even has the logistics to get their military efficiently to a battlefield that far away. I think people underestimate just how much the larger EU nations let their armed forces rot after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Aside from nukes France's army is a paper tiger, their own retired military generals have complained they only have enough munitions to fight a large scale war for about 3 days. This is also believable considering what we saw take place during the Libya operation in 2014. It was going to be a French operation where (as Obama said) "America would lead from behind. After 3 days of the air campaign against a weak Libya the French military was spent and America had to step in and do the job. Unfortunately France's military cannot project that type of power. They don't have the means or the ability to even consider undertaking an operation of that size. The only EU nation which has some operational readiness is probably Poland and they certainly don't have the logistical capabilities to fight a war that far from it's borders. In case of a conflict like this, America is the only show in town. And if we're disinterested or busy elsewhere, it's game over. This isn't some deep analysis either ,it's widely known by all nations involved.
1
@Seto_Kaiba, Another one of the false narratives he tried to draw.
1
@lawtraf8008 In the new world order run by the globalist elite, being pro-your own country is the biggest sin you can take part in. The biggest crime to partake in.
1
Russia doesn't have the experience and knowhow to run neo colonies in far flung places. Id' imagine they're simply content doing business. They don't have a worldwide network like the globalists to do these things and still keep a foothold there. IN the age of competition, you can't treat nations like this and expect to stick around for very long. France is learning this lesson of how the new world works the hard way. If Russia does wake up one day and try to copy what France has done in these regions, they'll be booted out quicker than the French were. Again those days are over.
1
@tylersmith4265 For a plethora of reasons we don't want to be seen trying to topple the UN recognized government there at this point. France and Israel seem to have no issues right now supporting a warlord trying to plunge the nation into civil war.
1
As someone who is follows this region quite deeply I found this video to be fascinating in a really bad way. Right out of CNN's playbook. Highlighting certain facts and omitted other facts to craft a false narrative. Over and over and over again.
1
@Olonne85 It doesn't take a Russian bot to understand France has been robbing this region blind for 100s of years. People knew this well before Russian bots or even the internet even existed.
1
Why would the western media cover this? It is run by corporate interests, why would they air their own crimes? Not that it really matters anymore, the rest of the world knows and now that has turned into a huge problem for these gangsters. Seems like their hayday is coming to an end. Especially France who will probably fall first.
1
@DCV7465. There is a huge demographic crisis there, it doesn't take Erdogan saying it for everyone to know. The birth rate is near replacement because of the millions of refugees having children like it's no one's business. The people in the west, ethnic Turks have a birth rate near 1.2. Which simply isn't sustainable.
1
What goes around comes around. Eventually France is going to pay for all these evil crimes.
1
@JohnRandoSmith You make it seem like any of change changes the main premise that France is and has been one of the most evil regimes the world has ever seen. And will eventually pay for their crimes.
1
@Ashnagarr618 Why would the truth be hard for me to handle? I'm not from either of these regions? You're from France, don't you think it is more likely for you to be emotionally triggered by the truth rather than someone who has nothing to do with that god forsaken country? Use your head frogger.
1