Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "A Day In History" channel.

@JohnJames2181. You're absolutely right, it should be labeled genocide. However when the Armenians push this issue I kindly remind them that if it's right to recognize such crimes from well over 100 years ago, surely we should recognize similar crimes committed so recently that most of the perpetrators are still alive. Like perhaps the Armenians ethnically cleansing 800,000 Azeri civilians in the 1990s. We could start there in naming genocides no, before working our way back to ancient times.
7
@RJ yes but you also have to agree some forms of it were more brutal than others.
2
@lou6749 It was more like one cent. An irrefutable one at that.
1
@lou6749 What I am or am not has nothing to do with the facts presented. If the facts trigger you, at least try to debate them. Instead of attempting to shoot the messenger.
1
@lou6749 You're apparently triggered over someone pointing out facts you clearly don't like. All the smiley faces you put up won't change this simple reality. In a way you remind me of purple haired gender studies students on campus here.
1
@Kristiyan Ivanov, So basically you're saying Bulgarians lived a 16th century life in the 16 century.
1
@Alex Ragen, this is true. There have been very few instances of people being enslaved based on their race. Most slavery was due to losing a war or being captured. And in most cases the children of those slaves weren't slaves either. To equate that type of slavery to the African slave trade is just weird. Especially these Ottoman "slaves" some of them ended up being the grand vizers of the empire (like presidents) Imagine an African slave being the president of the United States in the 1700s lol
1