Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1. @Gerry363c. The funny thing is they aren't even semitic themselves. They're the descendants of Europeans who converted to a religion of semitic people. The people these European zionists are slaughtering (Palestinians) are actually semitic. So by calling Israel out, it is actually a pro semitic action.
    1
  2.  @vexversaa239  Yes but when you're in a political union of states with nations like France and Germany. Then take political decisions on accordance with them. You kind of have to swallow the baggage that comes with it. You can't be in the EU then wash your hands of the actions of EU states. It really doesn't work that way.
    1
  3. The lunatics have taken over the asylum. God help us all.
    1
  4.  @mlg1279  How exactly is it BS? It may be an exaggeration that this is the "final nail" in the coffin. But you really can't realistically argue that funding and arming Israel to mass slaughter civilians wasn't a huge blow to the American reputation around the world. To a point I'm not sure this stain can be repaired for decades.
    1
  5.  @escaped1534  I fail to see how that fact has anything to do with my comment. Do you just randomly spout out facts which have absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter?
    1
  6.  davidng8710  Odd when everything you're saying goes against facts nearly everyone on this globe already knows. You might as well be trying to convince us the world is flat.
    1
  7. I find India's pro Israeli position on this issue quite shocking. This specific conflict has seen a very clear divide between the global south and the west. India being a leading member of the global south and it's main future economic and trade partners being the south, taking a position on the opposite end of the vast majority of the global south on one of the largest and most divisive issues of late is quite strange. I get that they're trying to look neutral but it's all very odd. I'm not making moral arguments on who's side they should be on or shouldn't be on. But on a strategic level it is a head scratching move by India and I fail to see how it helps their long term interests and goals.
    1
  8.  @deez3680  The original message was not a difficult one to understand.
    1
  9. @Rico Cortes, No but it's quite ironic that the Armenians did the same thing to the Azeris in the 1990s.
    1
  10. You're saying they shouldn't' be allowed but who will stop them. Also if they couldn't go into civilian areas, they wouldn't be doing this. Their entire premise is to murder as many civilians as possible and drive the rest of them out of the area so they can take the land. They have zero interest in fighting the men with guns. They're literally ignoring them and going out of their way to murder civilians.
    1
  11.  @MJ-ho5ex  You do realize your'e referring to a bunch of people who've been stuffed into the world's only concentration camp. You understand this right? Also Hamas, as they've admitted and Israel has also said are deep in the tunnels. The IDF seems to have zero interest in Hamas. They are however very interested in killing as many civilians as possible.
    1
  12.  @mussydesign7933  Yup. Your average Israeli is literally 100% European stock. They have literally nothing to do with being semitic. It is like they hijacked a word which has no relation to them. It is insane.
    1
  13. Does the world need to perform a military intervention in France to protect the protestors from the authoritarian regime in Paris? A lot like what was done in Libya? Maybe a no fly zone above Paris?
    1
  14. Even if that were true France isn't the country to do it. For two main reasons. 1. France is weak and everyone will just ignore this. 2. France is one of the world leaders in war crimes themselves. Assad would have to slaughter people for another 2000 years to even catch up to France on the war crimes leaderboard.
    1
  15.  @raivalitaqiolele  A bunch of guys stuck in a concentration camp with homemade weapons taking on one of the most technically advanced military forces on the planet? Yea, might take a bit of courage. The other side though? Not so much, when they have to fight men with guns they tend to pull back. Bombing women and children from afar? Yup, that is their bread and butter. Also you killed your own premise. If Hamas is in the tunnels, how are they using people who are above ground as human shields? Also if Hamas is in the tunnels, why is the IDF bombing everything above ground slaughtering women and children instead of going into the t unnels to get Hamas. Did you even think through your post before hitting reply?
    1
  16. @watchkiller99. This has nothing to do with balls. People really underestimate just how weak Saudi Arabia really is. They literally do not have the ability to defend themselves. So obviously they're going to tread carefully. Their military was trained to do one thing. Protect the regime against the people, they're not trained to fight a war or defend the country. All the balls or lack of balls in the world won't change this reality.
    1
  17.  @Billyb0b557  Well if you look at who the IDF actually likes to kill via the numbers of killed. You're right, the IDF has no interest in Hamas or men with guns from Hamas. Again going after kids with stones. That is what they're trained to do, so that is what they will do.
    1
  18. I hope you're referring to the child killing machine called the IDF.
    1
  19.  @vikabrox7100  Dude was just out in public giving a speech. What in the hell are you talking about?
    1
  20. @ what in the world are you talking about ? You sound like 1 of two things. 1. An overly emotional 12 year old 2. An Indian Which is it?
    1
  21.  @pinkpanter1208f  Oh if that was the trade off they wouldn't have much issue doing that. But that isn't the tradeoff. They are dealing with psychopaths who have nukes.
    1
  22. Not even the same or a bit lesser. If they had just 1/4th the weaponary and ammunition, they'd wreck the IDF. The IDF soldiers aren't trained to deal with men with guns. It is a military trained to kill women and children. They'd fold under that kind of pressure.
    1
  23.  @Sheikh_Yerbouti  It doesn't matter where those women and children are. As per IDF standard operation procedure they'd find a way to target the women and children.
    1
  24. They used and abused him, now he is being thrown in the trash. When is this idiot going to wake up and sit down at the negotiating table.
    1
  25.  @jjgreek1  He didn't say he is supporting Greek aggression. Read his comment again.
    1
  26.  @jjgreek1  Aside from your emotional rants regarding race and religion, I'm fairly sure the facts speak for themselves. Reality>Your feelings.
    1
  27.  @lalboimanlun1230  Hamas doesn't have tanks or planes. The apartheid zionist regime hell bent on genocide has all those things. Nice try though trying to blame the victims for the crimes of the zionists.
    1
  28.  @titusbrutus8861  They don't have to join the Turks. But they do need to stop working for Israel. It is pure and simply stupidity to do such a thing in that region of the world, it won't end well and people wont' forget.
    1
  29. You sound unhinged.
    1
  30.  @Mr_Negrodamus  So you're saying if a group of people didn't organize their nation in what you deem a nation state. They should be invaded, occupied, their children slaughtered and the survivors thrown into concentration camps? Is that seriously the argument you're trying to make here? Good luck with that.
    1
  31.  @close_all_tabs  that is exactly what happened. The way Olaf sees it, Germany isn't allowed to perform genocide anymore. So he might as well back and fund one right? Not as much fun for him but still probably satisfies that German itch.
    1
  32. Billions of dollars sent to Israel and this is the military they built? Seriously? Getting pawned up by a bunch of guys stuck in a concentration camp using homemade weapons? The "mighty" IDF being reduced to bombing women and children because they're too inept or afraid to go into the tunnels and fight men with guns?
    1
  33. Indian military tech? Interesting. Didn't India recently send a ton of military equipment "made in India" to Armenia. And didn't Armenia after trying to use that Indian tech in the recent conflict have to surrender after like 24 hours of fighting? Might be better to ask the Israeli army to come build your Iron Dome.
    1
  34.  @anubhavgangwar1383  I'm not talking about the 44 day war from 2020. I'm talking about the recent conflict which was only a few months ago where the Armenians who were armed to the teeth with Indian weapons gave up after 24 hours of fighting. Your government didn't do the reputation of your arms industry any favors by sending it over there.
    1
  35. Seriously? lol That is less likely than Britain making India a colony again.
    1
  36. If things continue to spiral out of control, anything is possible. Just a few years ago who would have thought some rag tag group of insurgents in Yemen would block one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. The Panama Canal, the strait off the coast of Yemen, the Persian gulf, the strait through Indonesia, and the Istanbul strait. If all these get shut down, the entire world economy will collapse. Oddly enough most of these choke points are controlled by Muslim nations.
    1
  37. There is really nothing to wait and see. EU doesn't want them and at this point they have zero interest in joining the EU. They're essentially making demands they know won't be met just to keep Sweden out. Even if the EU said "yes, come on in" they probably wouldn't.
    1
  38. @MiltonMoJunction, I doubt he is a bot. Perhaps you fail to realize that his feelings on the issue are more about his distaste for the globalist elites than his love for Putin. Do not underestimate how much frustration there is in the global south for the globalist elites running most western states. They'd cheer on a donkey if it were fighting the globalists. The global south accounts for more than 85% of the world population and the vast majority of them now view Putin as a hero due to his conflict with Washington/London/Paris. Hard to believe a comment where nearly 85% of the world probably agrees with is likely to be a bot. In fact, statistically you're more likely to be a bot than him. Reality>Your feelings.
    1
  39. The fact that the regime in Paris said anything about not wanting civilians to be killed is odd. Usually France is always on the side of war crimes and illegal killings. Shocking.
    1
  40.  user-ph8hn2rv9h  Yes but Indonesians aren't famous for being liars and crooks.
    1
  41. I don;t know what all this Nato talk is. This is not a Nato mission. There is no way to get Nato officially involved in this insanity. It would get vetoed by a plethora of Nato nations.
    1
  42.  @davidalexsebastiank6250  No it doesn't get involved because they don't want to be in the awkward position of defending the side which illegally invaded it's neighbor, occupied it's territory for 30 years and ethnically cleansed 800,000 civilians. Not only is it a bad look, it would also make their arguments that what Russia did is wrong look ridiculous if they were found to be supporting what Armenia did. You think the west gives a fuk what Turkey thinks as Nato member? If they did, they wouldn't be armed Kurdish militia in Syria which are attacking Turkey.
    1
  43.  @davidalexsebastiank6250  Not to mention it has conflict with every single one of it's neighbor's except Iran. Making territorial claims on every single one of it's neighbors except Iran. Odd situation this tiny little Nazi state has gotten itself into.
    1
  44.  @keckchan7156  This is not a Nato operation, Nato won't be dragged into this. The idea of going to war so Israel can save 10% on it's shipping coasts isn't something most Nato nations would be interested in. The Houthis don't look like they'll be "annihilated" anytime soon.
    1
  45.  @keckchan7156  Yes you're right this might be the calm before the storm. But again there is no way Nato as an organization will get involved in this. Perhaps specific members states but not "Nato." Nato is far too fractured for every single member to be on board with this insanity.
    1
  46. If this conflict erupts near the Red Sea. Europe is in A LOT of trouble. Winter is coming and they need natural gas badly. Not to mention this will speed up their deindustrialization. We're literally watching an entire civilization collapse before our very eyes.
    1
  47. Russia needs the naval bases in Syria more than how it feels about his NATO sweat. I doubt the Russian leadership is as emotional as you when making decisions
    1
  48. @Pratham, This hasn't hit the Azeri economy at all. With energy prices through the roof they're doing better than they ever have in their history.
    1
  49.  @rifenossimple4344  With all things being equal the average Azeri citizen is A LOT wealthier than the average Indian citizen. It's not even close.
    1
  50.  @khalil_921  Considering all the evidence coming out, what you're saying seems flat out wrong. The attack seems like it was a complete and utter failure.
    1