Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "CaspianReport" channel.

@Kyle Prather Yea what you're saying makes sense. It's hard to be the salesmen of a certain way of life when you have guys with rifles walking around someone's village.
1
@massivereader And you believe the Russians have the stamina and the energy to push that far? They're having trouble securing places right across their border these days. Would they like to move into all the places you've mentioned, for sure they would. They've had that habit since their formation. Is it likely or even possible? I'm not so sure.
1
Egypt has a huge military and has recently purchased lots of high tech equipment. The question is, does it have the ability to actually wage war? Or is it another Saudi Arabia with a lot of fancy toys with no one that actually knows how to use them. Aside from some missile strikes and air raids, does Egypt's military have the ability plus the logistics to actually move on Ethiopia? I highly doubt it.
1
@Michael VPS having your people freeze to death in the winter only to help globalists stoke up tensions for a war you don't want isn't an irrational move on the part of the Germans. Also last I checked no Nato nation is being attacked.
1
@funbun420 You might want to read my comment again skippy.
1
@Sebastian Bass India has legitimate grievances with American foreign policy? It will have to get on a LONG line LOL
1
@kebman It never should have been the duty of the American tax payer in the first place. But you know the old saying, if you break it you buy it.
1
@TheSwedishHistorian. Yup, if you pull out all the emotions and simply look at the chessboard. Hamas just took Israel's rook and is now eyeing it's bishop.
1
Well civil strife has already started in their country and terrorist organizations and warlords suddenly have a lot more weapons and funding than they should.
1
@105 031. The Russians see Crimea is a life or death geo strategic asset. They will literally do anything to hold it.
1
@AM-mu2kv If you go back far enough this is absolutely true. Crimea is native Tatar territory. It's odd how two sides who don't really even own the place are fighting over it. The problem is how many Crimean Tatars are actually left, especially after the Russian meted out insane ethnic cleansing campaigns against them in the past? The sad reality is that now the Russians have Crimea and I don't think they'll ever give it back to anyone and will resort to anything including nukes to keep it. Crimea is now Russian territory and will probably remain so. :O(
1
@IusedtohaveausernameIliked Bluster is one thing, all strong men are known for it. Crimea is another matter all together. It isn't an issue which is grandstanding for one man. The Russians (Putin or no Putin) believe it's strategic importance to be a matter of life and death for Russia. So again, they will defend it at all costs. Again don't listen to what they say look at what they do. They have a full blown war going on in Ukraine proper, they are losing ground in many areas yet most of their military resources are still going to defend Crimea which isn't really under threat right now. Putin or no Putin, Russia won't give Crimea up without a serious blood bath and possibly WW3.
1
@sepulturaoftheforest2869 I don't think anyone claimed either of these nations have super charged economies. They do however possess more than enough military might to exert influence in their regions.
1
@pukel95 Pushing a narrative and giving analysis of a situation are two very different things. If you don't understand this difference, why even bother having this conversation?
1
@KR, Yes they will eventually leave them alone. Not because they want to but soon they will have no choice. France is slowly being dislodged from North Africa as we speak. This will spread to other nations as well. Also I wouldn't talk about "Europe" leaving Africa alone. The vast majority of European nations do nothing in Africa. It's mostly France, England and Italy to a much smaller degree.
1
@HisShadow, the devolution essentially happened in the nations which have extremely high inbreeding rates. Successive generations of genetic damage took it's toll. You'll notice the few Muslim countries where inbreeding isn't very common are the ones which aren't always in chaos.
1
@Ellinon_Vasileus You can use all the cheap rhetoric you want but you do realize in many instances around the globe where one nation has a small island off the coast of another nation, they don't call a continental shelf on it, it's called good neighborly relations. But you can continue to push your neighbor as far as you can push your neighbor. Just don't come crying to the rest of us when one day they decide to push back.
1
@Ellinon_Vasileus You can claim a person is hypocritical and full of lies but you do realize you have to actually establish why that's true. You simply can't have an emotional meltdown, throw baseless claims and expect to be taken seriously. My point still stands, if you guys want to continue what you're doing, knock yourselves out. I'm merely saying don't come crying to us when your neighbors decide to push back. You want war? Great, go fight it. You can't expect the world to pay your bills and fight your wars, just sayin....
1
Europe's soft power isn't nearly what it used to be. Their level of influence around the world is drying up by the day.
1
So that is one how excuses plunging 200 million people into poverty and starvation? Not to mention the mass slaughter of millions? That would be like me shooting you in the head, slaughtering your family, robbing your house and then claiming I shouldn't be judged for it because anyone else with the opportunity would have done it to you. That may or may not be true but it doesn't make it right does it? France must one day account for these crimes.
1
@Rico Germany's best bet is to finance Poland's military into getting even bigger and stronger, much like a buffer. No chance Germany will be building up a suitable military force anytime soon (if ever)
1
@sssd3461 People don't change overnight. If you can't understand why Germany cannot be a military powerhouse, It's not my job to work around your stupidity.
1
@sssd3461 Demographic collapse for starters. A culture which has completely and utterly emasculated their men. An entire generation of men who will outright refuse to go to war. The psychological scars of wars past and the fear of anything militaristic. The reality is in the future Poland will probably be the one defending Germany. Not the other way around. Unless you're going to tell me all the migrants who flooded Germany and will probably be a majority at that country will build a high tech military for them? Is that your contention?
1
@wilhelmbittrich88 So let me understand your logic here. Africans are dumb so France should manage their money. Africans deserve to be robbed by France due to their shortcomings I prefer Africans to be to be robbed so my investments in France can grow. Do you have any idea what a sociopathic lunatic you sound like? Are people around you on a daily basis aware of these ideas you have and your character? If not, they should be.
1
@nailil5722 The French are lazy and don't produce as much as the Germans. The only reason they're considered a first rate nation is because of all the wealth they extract from Africa. Once that ends, France is in trouble. Which isn't far off away btw.
1
@Nub, I think well before this conflict ever erupted Europe's influence on the geopolitical chess board was very weak. This conflict simply highlighted how much influence they've lost globally. No one really cares what they think. Look at the conflict in Ukraine for example. It's basically a show run by America and the Russians. With the Turks and the Chinese nibbling away at the edges. Europe is nowhere to be found aside from begrudgingly cowering behind America's back.
1
@kaniel_outis1 Powerful yes, when compared to small impoverished islands in your periphery. When a heavyweight shows up? Not so much.
1
@georgedevries3992 The OP is surely ridiculous I'll give you that. Although your contention of the opposite happening might be even more ridiculous.
1
@MegrelMamba Actually no, those areas were invaded and occupied by the Greeks. Historically the inhabitants were indigenous Anatolians, groups like the Hittites and what not. Until they were occupied by the Greeks. And then they were occupied by the Turks.
1
@saucesriracha3763 I'm not from France or any nation France has a problem with, why would I be bias. France by the public admission of their own army officials only has enough arms to fight for about 4 days. We saw how their military crumbled when they took the lead in the invasion of Libya (a weak nation) and America had to step in and finish the job because the French military's capabilities collapsed after 3 days. Bias is simply not looking a the reality of a situation. Join us in reality my friend.
1
China doesn't monopolize the monetary system of any nation. Nor does it ever do it by force like France.
1
@londoncrow500 Depends on your point of view, completely and utterly putting your safety in the hands of others could in theory lead to a point where you can lose your freedom. (which often happens if you study history)
1
@londoncrow500 The United States current government is slowly but surely turning authoritarian. Your statistics show this. The people want their guns to mitigate how far the government can go. If we weren't dropping in freedom indexes so quickly, if our freedoms weren't being stripped away daily, if the people didn't feel like the government doesn't care what the people think, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
1
@londoncrow500 I think first we need an independent media which for all intents and purposes we simply don't have.
1
@Yaboychad They don't have the same gun culture we do here in the United States. I doubt there is much of a demand for it either.
1
@Lord_Nordan Interesting, I hadn't noticed that. Maybe he sold the channel? Or he just hired someone to narrate?
1
@ANGEL9837354 A peace treaty set in iron clad to hold the peace being broken isn't exactly what I'd call a rational step. I honestly fail to understand what Greece hopes to achieve by sparking a war.
1
One of their biggest problems has been the fact it's too centralized. You do understand what centralized state power means right? Every little decision made in that country flows through Ankara.
1
@smyrnianlink So you're basically agreeing with me that Turkey is highly centralized? For some nations centralization works or other nations decentralization works but that isn't what we're debating here. The debate is if Turkey is centralized or not. It most certainly is.
1
@smyrnianlink Yes English may be a poor language but you could have done a much better job at articulating yourself. You literally said one thing and now you're saying you meant something else. I don't think it's wise to have an emotional meltdown over an issue because you had trouble properly articulating yourself. Perhaps sticking to your native language might avoid these problems?
1
@Roan Westraat. Poland is always nervous. Can't say I blame them either being sandwiched between the Germans and Russians for all these years and all the terrible experiences that came with it.
1
@maxscania I don't think they even need to make an argument. They found a better deal which they believe is in the best defense interests of their nation and they took it. I'm actually quite shocked they even considered making such a large deal with France in the first place.
1
@maxscania Which part of making an arms deal along with a geopolitical commitment to a nation which can't project power in your region didn't you understand? This isn't a rocket science my man.
1
@maxscania I think you're quite confused as to what exactly you were originally responding to. You might want to scroll up to the comment you actually responded to. And yes, it is embarrassing for you but a type of embarrassment you're incapable of comprehending.
1
@maxscania You do realize I replied to your comment and not the OP's right? My reply to you had nothing to do with the original post's views. In fact the point was the original post's views are irrelevant. "@Mo Z I don't think they even need to make an argument. They found a better deal which they believe is in the best defense interests of their nation and they took it. I'm actually quite shocked they even considered making such a large deal with France in the first place." You actually responded to this post above by me with complete and utter nonsense. I'm hoping English is your second language and this is why there is such a huge disconnect with what I'm saying and what you're replying to. It's either an English problem on your part or you're so irrational that continuing this conversation with you would be insanity on my part.
1
@maxscania Don't apologize for being harsh. Apologize for being stupid.
1
@Mira Moche No they can't leave the CFA if they want. Others have tried with horrible consequences. Perhaps they're terrified because they've seen what does to other nations who do it. Warlords and terrorists get funded to the gills and the country is destroyed. France rules this area through fear and corruption.
1