Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "'Noncognitive' Celebrities Push Anti-Gay Marriage Agenda For NOM" video.

  1. Beautiful. You heard "non-cognitive", googled it & rattled off the terms used in a wiki article as a means to make yourself seem "in the know". That's EXACTLY what no-cognition is: stupidity. Lemme guess, you're going to pretend to have studied philosophy or rhetoric & therefore that would mean you actually understand the concept of changing ethics too. Maybe you'll even plagiarize some Korzibsky. I bet you'll use a $5 word like "sociometric" too. You fail. Get some education YOURSELF.
    1
  2. I'm a grown man. I enjoy how you bust out some historical references that everyone read about in 7th grade social studies & try to pass it off as esoterica. Then when you get called on it, you don't rebut with anything substantive. You merely double down with frail ad hominems. You couldn't get a 3.7 at a fucking nursery school. There's plenty of room for you at the Blackburn Institute... and the Darwin Award Hall of Fame.
    1
  3. There's nothing to lie about. My name is James Martin. I was the only guy with that name who graduated from those colleges in those, particular disciplines those years. Also, your notion that "educated people don't..." shows your lack of education. If you knew anything, you'd know that the entire world is comprised of individuals who behave how they see fit. The only small thing here is the aggregate, cognitive, learning curve of yourself & ganixaba. Keep losing.
    1
  4. I made no assumptions. I took your premise from the comment YOU published. But I must say, I love how all your cathexis is on that premise. If you WERE educated, you'd know taht everyone came across that shit in GRADE SCHOOL. That means any other argument you can render (esp. about the original topic in this video) is feeble. You keep failing. I also like how you take a missing shot at my grammar then sprain your arm tryna pat yourself on the back for failing once again. You're weak.
    1
  5. If you're trying to take civil rights from a socially identified group, you ARE against that group. Did you have a stroke or something?
    1
  6. Actually, I got my AS in chemistry from Malcom X College ('96) & my BA in philosophy from Roosevelt University ('99). I also studied General Semantics quite a bit at the School of Natural Order at Home Farm in Baker, NV. To have studied GS, you'd've had to come across non-cognitivism in your studies. That's called EDUCATION. But you're too busy thinking wiki is a substitute. READ a book then talk to me. Then again, I ain't expecting you to cognate OR cogitate on much of anything.
    1
  7. Before you go googling Korzibsky, I'll warn you: don't try to bring general semantics into the discussion unless you've actually READ Science & Sanity. Don't try to run off Toffler or Burroughs as if it's your own original idea either. Better yet, just shut the fuck up. These neo-cons, with a neo-hedonistic philosophy that basically blames an intellectual for being motivated by something other than philistine pursuit, are morons. Face facts.
    1
  8. But not having studied a topic then skimming over a few paragraphs doesn't make a person informed; especially not informed enough to say that someone (TYT in this instance) don't know what they're talking about. That's what ganix did though. Also, I don't need to "try to make myself look smart". I AM smart. But that's not of consequence right now. What IS of consequence is that I actually know what "non-cognitivism" is. You fail miserably. It's fun to watch.
    1