Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Ashley Judd vs. Sarah Palin" video.

  1. ...better yet. what ecological problem is presented by the wolves preying on the moose/deer supply? is there a certain vegetation that robs farmland of nutrients that the moose deer eat (but can't eat because they're being killed)? honestly, i'm intellectually curious as to what you have to say about it. in what way is the ecology knocked out of balance because of wolves. i'm all ears
    1
  2. dying career? she was twice nominated for a golden globe. she's got 2 projects in the hopper. that's a far cry from being on professional life support my friend. either way, you haven't addressed the content here. answer the fundamental question. can sarah palin deny this ad? nope. please, join US in the real world where content is actually important
    1
  3. spendaholic? you're hilarious. bush spent the entire surplus. afraid of palin? ARE YOU KIDDING? we're praying that her stupid ass tries to run again. it'll be taking candy from a conservative baby
    1
  4. obsessed? you don't even have any indication of that let alone are you able to even qualify any nonsense like that. save your straw men for yellow bricked roads. kid? i'm 33 you moron. like i said before, you can talk about "spendaholics" but the reality is that W spent more than anyone else. nuff siad. what's more, you're talking about congress doing spending but in the same breath declaring that the WH is doing the spending. NEWSFLASH: those are different branches...idiot
    1
  5. "if you don't live in alaska mind your own business"? these are UNITED states. if someone attacked you, we'd all feel it & perceive it as an attack on america. you may be correct about the wolves decimating the deer/moose population but in reality, interfering with that ecological process may be even worse. by your reasoning, it's valid to hunt grizzly bears because they eat too many salmon. that makes little to no sense if you reflect on how much actual deer/moose consumption occurs....
    1
  6. ps. it's difficult for a population of 305M people to even WORK 500M jobs, let alone LOSE 500M jobs. learn some arithmetic. i'm not sure what's more disturbing, your lack of mathematical prowess or the 5 people (whose math is worse) that gave you thumbs ups. "...BASIC gov't studies..."? you don't even have a cursory understanding of gov't or simple math; how can you tell me what's "basic"? think before you post
    1