Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Gay Megachurch Pastor" video.

@bluefootedpig A guy having another guy as his roadie is not the same as a guy having a husband. Why don't you get that? If you think marriage is simply a set of various activities, you'll never understand what intimacy is. True intimacy is having 1's soul complemented. With homosexuals, that complement happens to come from members of the same gender.
1
@bluefootedpig I guess what I'm saying is that you can't be mired down by physical acts when determining actual sexuality because that miring ignores the emotional elements. It's not lust or a fetish. You're thinking about the act of sex instead of the practice of love. That's an extremely crude way of examining interpersonal dealings.
1
@bluefootedpig Dude, "turned on" isn't the same as attraction. You're confusing a biological function with an emotional state of being. Sure I guy can choose to be in the closet; many do. But he can't change his intrinsic programming.
1
@bluefootedpig What leads you to question the "born gay" postulate? Your own metrics? Your own orientation? Social standard? I've already explained what "gay" is. Thta's always been consistent. Whether you read or embrace it is your prerogative. But don't deny that it's there. History hasn't shown any causal link between the increase of people coming out with this country's pathology (whatever the fuck that means). What the fuck "history" are you reading?
1
@bluefootedpig No. Your point about food isn't a point. It's a meaningless non-sequitir & I won't address it beyond this sentence. This isn't about like/dislike. This is about a pastor knowing that he's gay. Homosexuality isn't a simple choice like which color socks you wear. Homosexuality is a definitive part of who those men & women are. It's not about "can change" or "will to change". This is about something that's intrinsic & immutable.
1
@bluefootedpig It's not just about where a guy puts his dick. It's about where a guy is emotionally. Yes, cornholing a man is an act of gay sex. But homosexuality is picking out matching carpet & upholstery with your life partner, Lance. It's deeper than just the sex my friend.
1
@bluefootedpig Yes. Homosexuality means having romantic love for someone of the same gender. And love is more about emotional intimacy than sex. I think you understand that postulate. Yes. The relationship transcends sex. If your wife dies, you can't fuck her. Right? Does that diminish your love for her or was she just a piece of ass? And it's up for you or me to determine the "worth" of 2 people's relationship. It's up to you & me to acknowledge it on whatever terms & respect it.
1
@bluefootedpig My ex was a fantastic piece of ass. But what I loved about her was her humanity & intellect. Beauty fades. We get fat, our faces sag. We lose our hair. But true love doesn't fade. Nevertheless, homosexuals are born with the initiative that seeks love among people of their own gender.
1
@bluefootedpig First off, learn some verb-object agreement. Bad grammar not only makes you look illiterate, it makes communication very difficult. What are gay rights? They are legislative actions that protect people who'd otherwise be marginalized simply because they're gay. That includes hate crimes, equal opportunity, property-estate & marriage laws. What makes someone gay isn't primitive attraction. A person keeps romantic company & life partnership with someone of the same sex.
1
@bluefootedpig No. You can't find romantic love with a man if you're intrinsically heterosexual. That's the part you keep avoiding. You're also thinking that your life is the meter stick for everyone else's. Why are you missing this?
1
@clipsryan He can control being gay? How?
1
@bluefootedpig That logic is ridiculous. You're also confusing selectivity in partners with intrinsic attraction. I like women. Sure I'm selective about the women I deal with. But I still like women. In much the same way, a gay man likes men. He can't change that. Also, we're not talking about food. We're talking about human beings. Stop arguing false equivalencies.
1