Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Violence Against Women Act: Obama Threatens Veto Over Watered Down Version" video.

  1. Because women are more physically vulnerable than men are. Let's be honest. Assuming you're a guy, you could eat cheeseburgers & smoke 2pks/day & still beat your wife to pieces & she's a gym rat. Aside from that, as a man, it's your protective duty to NOT hit your woman. If it's really that intense, walk away from her.
    1
  2. Yes, I'm an outlier of sorts but I feel pain & I'm as physically vulnerable as the next person. I just have a different ROM when it comes to fighting. As far as being "another fat feminist behind a keyboard", all you'd have to do is click a mouse & see my public videos. But you're too stupid to that. And yes, as a man, I get to decide how I measure other men. Our strength is to protect & provide for those who are more vulnerable; not harm them. I guess you're just a male; not a man.
    1
  3. So wait, feminists are happy that such a law protects women of all races, creeds, colors & relationships? I think ALL people would be happy to pass a law that protects everyone. I sure am. Get married if you want. Just don't abuse your spouse. Marriage makes your life better; not more abusive.
    1
  4. No. I'm pointing out a basic fact: don't say dumb shit when information is LITERALLY at your fingertips. My brain is much better developed than my biceps. You see, I'm savvy enough to USE MY MOUSE. I don't care what you think of me. That's the best part about manhood: you answer to very few people. I know you're a pansy because you'd fight a woman instead of loving her. Hopefully, I'll live a life without violence & stress. Hopefully you will too.
    1
  5. So instead of presenting an actual argument, you'll lie? You must follow Bill O'Reilly on twitter.
    1
  6. Sheeit. A gun is only as good as its user & most people aren't qualified to use them. Spare me. As for a knife, you have to be close enough to use it. Again, if you're close enough to stab me, I'm close enough to break your jaw. But that's a non-sequitir argument. A man has a protective duty. I guess you don' t understand that because you're a pipsqueak or something like that.
    1
  7. You already lost by showing how smart you aren't... as usual. What's ironic is that you're trying to call the next person, "stupid", but in turn, making yourself look less than sharp. As for being a "victim of female violence", that would require me being a victim. I don't do vick. That's your detail.
    1
  8. No. YOU are dumb if you don't recognize the facts.
    1
  9. That duty is more heavy on a man. Yes, special strength requires special duty. As for being a "femnazi" I guess you're trying to elicit some kind of emotional reaction. Look elsewhere for that. I'm a 6'5", 230lb, fit, martial artist. If I hit my girlfriend, it's gonna be a little different than her hitting me. I know that. You know that. Any judge of jury knows that. Hence my special duty. Men have more upper body strength & more aggression. We're peers but we will never be equals.
    1
  10. It sounds like you haven't read the bill. In any case, this isn't about gov't control. It's about making sure the penalties are tough on people who commit violent acts on women. Also, protecting Native Americans & immigrants presupposes that the perpetrators are NOT white men. You fail. Stop flagging up your own comment, loser.
    1
  11. It depends on his condition. But I must say, I love how you're using the outliers to make your point. That's literally a leap. Keep failing, pipsqueak.
    1