Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "NRA's 'Enemy List '" video.

  1. That's another ad hominem fallacy. It doesn't matter who's arguing it. What matters is what's being argued. Is a hit list irresponsible? Yes. Anything else you're saying that doesn't address the premise is going to be ignored.
    1
  2. "A-political" is a presumption you're making. Also, he was defenitely a nut but Sarah Palin's & Glenn Beck's hitlists weren't helping anything. As for painting someone as a victim, that's stupid. Gabby WAS the victim. There's nothing to depict any other way. Also, responsible regulation isn't the same thing as "anti-gun". I know you're stupid but don't feign deaf.
    1
  3. She was targeted. Even if you deny a causal link (that's okay with me), you can't deny correlation. Also, your rhetoric about "the dems" & your platitudes about "the liberals" is in complete ignorance of the fact that we need some reasonable regulations. You keep making emotional arguments. I guess that's the only reasoning you can muster because logic ain't on your side.
    1
  4. What's an enemy list but a hit list? Wasn't Gabby Guiffords "targeted" as an "enemy"? Would you make the same concession if say, the New Black Panther Party made a hit list? What if the Shining Paths or the Weather Underground made a list? Just because the NRA is legal doesn't mean they're intrinsically good. For what it's worth, it's not a "list of people whose policies & political action involvement with whom we have a mature & civil disagreement with". It's a direct trageting ploy.
    1
  5. Didn't a hit list get Gabby Guiffords shot? Why is the NRA so fucking reckless?
    1