Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "O'Reilly: Liberals Think White Men Are The Problem" video.

  1. since you mentioned limbaugh i'll address it (even though it's a straw man). limbaugh said what he said. but he really has no station. he can afford to talk that dumb shit. sotomayor's situation is vastly different. but here's what's my other concern, complaining about political correctness is inconsistent to your far right/ far left outlook. you need to be more consistent
    1
  2. but i like how you think you're insulting me by sayong "you're not cut out for corporate america". that's like telling a 4'10" japanese man that he'l never play center for the knicks. since we're taking score let's take a quick tally. flyingtorpedo, you can barely read a sentence let alone write 1. you're projecting your personality flaws on me. you think your friends are, somehow, inferior because of their membership in a race identified group. you are exponentially stupid
    1
  3. the bullshit about equality is that you've already made up your mind that affirmative action got me into the 12th ranked school in the united states. you didn't ask my iq, my sat scores, my gpa, my extra-curricular activities, my awards or even my major. you just looked (metaphorically) at my beautiful black skin & figured i need to be playing ball instead of researching cancer. that's what you guys do. yes, i'm generalizing
    1
  4. mate, they WERE taken out of context. she made no missteps or slips. she meant to say that here upbringing, for better or worse, is what shapes here judgment & her sense of fairness. YES, she's going to be empathetic. that was taken out of context. but here's the real issue: since america has been under white male control for som long, white males are offended when we (people from other racial background) call y'all on your bullshit about equality. put up or shut up
    1
  5. i'd like to see you point out a misspelling of mine. don't worry, i'll wait... a grown man in a prelude is comedy. a grown, black man in a prelude is preposterous. i stand by that even if you consider it chauvinist. but i don't quite see what bearing that has on any of this
    1
  6. affirmative action is not preferential. have you even read the EOE act or the AA bill? obviously not
    1
  7. nah, i've corresponded with you quite a bit; i know enough. as far as "generalization" goes, you need to read my commentary a little better. you can't really make any assumptions about my character or integrity because you haven't walked & talked with; you probably never will. i'm inclined to think that right now, it's you whose projecting upon me. but you're right about 1 thing, i have no interest, whatsoever, in "corporate america". it's inorganic to humanity.
    1
  8. the fact that you call them minorities says quite a bit. the fact that misspelled academia says more. "not saying theIR ISn't PEOPLE out there" & "theIR are many..." says the most. this "advocacy against affirmative action" is coming straight from the right wing. spare me with the rest
    1
  9. dude, if you're so obtuse that you can't admit that racism is the motivation of much of fox "news" & much of the right wing, you're not worth conversation. you took sotomayor's comment out of context. "what if a white man had said that?" doesn't matter because the reality is that she's a hispanic woman, end of discussion. dude, the world is evolving. evolve with it or become extinct. there are no other options
    1
  10. feel free to generalize whatever you please. be my guest. but you should read 1st. i think i said "much of". wouldn't you agree? also, there's a tom of issues brought up by progressives, liberals & radicals (like me). but your generalization is useless because there's no ethereal "far left". it's simply people with similar ethics whose opinions are near a similar proximity on the political compass. but you can't deny the biases on fox. you really can't. but i'm down to laugh. go ahead & try
    1