Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Larry David's Controversial 'Jesus Bathroom' Clip" video.

  1. The 1st Egypytians were Black. Make no mistake. But you're correct, Jesus would have probably looked more like me than like that lithograph. At best, Jesus would have looked like a N. African. Irrespective though, that particular picture has a specific, political origin. Google Cesare de Borgia.
    1
  2. Thanks.
    1
  3. That's not even Jesus. If he existed, he didn't look like that (like John Barrymore). That likeness is actually Cesare de Borgia, the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander V. Fuck that painting.
    1
  4. Do you know anything about critical thinking? If you did, you'd know that you can't equate the plot device of accidentally pissing on a $2.50 picture of Cesare de Borgia w/ pissing on a grave. Let alone pissing on a "symbol" because that "symbol" means different things in different contexts. Use your head... if you can.
    1
  5. You are SUCH an idiot. How does President Obama correlate to THIS video?
    1
  6. Your comment is chock full of straw men. You can't even reason. No wonder your party & political philosophy is disintegrating before our eyes.
    1
  7. I don't disagree w/the premise that fundamentalist law predicated on religion is bullshit. But you can't present an argument to me that possessing or composing a picture that has a likeness of Muhammad is a punishable offense in countries governed by Sharia. That's certainly not in your comfort zone.
    1
  8. However, Luke traces Yeshua back to Dawood. In any case, nothing in the text (if you accept it; I don't. I'm just following their premise) says that Yeshua, Joshua or Jesus was a White, brunette man.
    1
  9. Nice. It sounds like you've never actually read up on that. I know for certain that Sharia has no stipulation of such a thing. We're ON THE INTERNET. Read something before oyu comment again.
    1
  10. I think you're referring to idoltry & iconization of Allah; not Muhammad. Muhammad is considered a prophet in a very similar way that Joshua is considered a prophet. I kinda understand what you're getting at but I think your premise might be a little off. I don't disagree that Muslims ain't big on pictures but I wouldn't say that it's a forbidden practice unless it's a depiction of God himself. But that's just my take.
    1
  11. Revelations writes about it. The fact that Yeshua was born in Palestine gives good indication. There's a coin that tried to depict him. If you accept the story of genealogy, you trace Yeshua back to Ibrahim. All that said, we don't exactly have a digital photo of him but we have a fair sense. After all, it was only 2009yrs ago.
    1
  12. But all sarcasm aside, I gotta compliment you on the "MENTAL" thing, that was clever.
    1
  13. You're a moron.
    1
  14. MOOOOOOOOOOOROOOOOOON
    1
  15. In fairness, Muhammad doesn't have the same status in the Islamic canon as does Jesus in the Christian canon. Moreover, Muhammad's appearance isn't described in the Qu'ran. But I've seen some artistic depictions of Muhammad talking to Jubrail (Gabriel). But to be frank, I didn't know that drawings of Muhammad weren't allowed. Where did you get that?
    1
  16. Please tell me you're being sarcastic.
    1