General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
upabittoolate
The Young Turks
comments
Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Poll Numbers Show Progressive Domination Over Conservatives" video.
you can't even stay with me in the present. i doubt you can predict my next move. i'm still waiting for you to render something other than blog based rhetoric. don't worry, i'll wait
1
you should try to write in complete, coherent sentences. maybe the capital letters are a bit much as well. also, he's NOT getting it wrong. he's reporting a poll
1
dishonest? i'm not sure what you mean. i'm a little sneaky but that's not exactly dishonest; maybe just opportunistic. but i think we're far from that country that re-elected reagan.
1
i could postulate about kennison's sexuality 'til rapture by your reasoning. you can call me all the names you like. in truth, i could have YOUR woman if i wanted her. but you're obviously terrified of the changing world. homophobia is played out my friend. that fact that you're so concerned about homosexuals is (again) extremely telling. do you realize how much you're telling on yourself? do you?
1
rassmusen is a consultant for the RNC you moron. you're honestly trying to talk about biases? try again. oh i almost forgot. take THAT
1
you can talk all the peripheral nonsense you like. but you can deny the facts. your poll came from an RNC consultant. you can't claim impartiality there. you can claim gop victories between you & me all you like. but you can't deny the majority of jackson's party in congress & the white house. you lost the argument. get over it
1
fair enough. cheers
1
i've heard political spectrum. cool. but compass is either new to me you used it in proper context (for me). but thanks for the permission. lol . the whigs were on their way out OR they ran to another party. i'm a green radical but i usually play blue before i play red. that's my allusion. but i still think that saying it was an absolute, 180 deg shift for both parties isn't the best depiction considering that the dem party is older than the GOP. but i ain't the most polisci guy in the world
1
your "examples" aren't anything but entertainment. dude, you're not even a worthy opponent. you're a joke in every sense of the word; a bad joke at that. i love when people declare "checkmate" after doing absolutely nothing. thanks for the laugh
1
no race card here. the fact that you think the world exists in some whitebread plane is why i said that. lookit, people are going to be gay. there's nothing you can do to stop it. it's not a mental defect. it's not an abomination. it's a sexual orientation. PERIOD. i've never asked for ANYTHING from ANYONE. i got my education & i work my ass off like most americans do. so spare me the bootstrap lecture. it's stupidity that under attack; not you. btw, i'm not a liberal. i'm a RA-DI-CAL
1
kappa alpha psi
1
fuckface? mtv? you lose
1
lincoln was a democrat for all intents & purposes. he wasn't a dixiecrat. but he was considered a radical. your analysis of republicans in that era is solid. but your analysis of democrats leaves a bit to be desired because their social ethos didn't have the same issues that dems have now & i think you haven't considered the influence of whigs in the political climate. but you're very correct, political compass wise, (i'm gonna use that if you don't mind) lincoln was a progressive.
1
my friend, i could have your woman or any other woman i want. i've had more than my share of women. i was a college ballplayer, a frat brother & i've always been a tall, handsome, intelligent, kind gentleman. i've had women from 18 to 60. in fact, i've turned down more women than you've probably had. that's not w/o it's consequences but that's beside my point. anything else you're saying sounds like insecurity on your part. compounded by your other comments, it's very telling.
1
i never called you a racist. i called you stupid & obtuse. but i suppose you're a little defensive about that. perhaps i struck a nerve
1
a center right country? is that why we elected a liberal majority in congress? is that why the president is so left? america is finally on its way to being part of the global community. isn't it nice?
1
why? because you can't make a conclusion about everyone within a race identified group. because there is no, ethereal "black people". there's just people. remember, it was you who got defensive about your own racism. no one made that attack on you. it's like saying "well while you're kicking my ass, don't forget to break my ribs while you're at it, they're delicate too". are you really this stupid?
1
you let it leak (no pun intended). the only reason, i can ascertain, that you'd spend more than a moment's reflection on the gory details of male, gay sex is that you've deeply pondered it. a heterosexual man is too busy thinking about women to think about gay men. that's how it works. you're not my equal so this isn't a debate. this is me taking you to school. make that distinction. sam kennison was a long haired, high voiced, spaz in a beret. how gay can a man be?
1
most black people didn't migrate here. don't forget that there were scandanavian settlers in north america from the middle ages too. i wouldn't exactly call them immigrants. hell mexico is in north america. you could argue that mexicans are "real americans". lol
1
also, i never knew kennison was a psychologist. i thought he attended a divinities school. point. set. match
1
you're right. facts ARE childish. you're right, rassmussen isn't from CT. rassmussen can't be found as an RNC consultant if a person google's his name or searches the center for public integrity. you're right. there ISN'T a democratic majority in congress. there aren't democrats in the white house. you're right, of the 44 presidents, 20 have been democrats , 1 had no party, 1 was a federalist & 4 were whigs but somehow, you think there have been more republicans. i guess i'm childish.
1
a real man does a lot of things. but it's not your place to define manhood. it's up to that man to define things for himself given certain context. it's even more telling that you think some gay guy is placing a child under attack. being gay is a little weird to me; it's a little weird to you. but ultimately, it's normal to a gay person. again, it's not your place to define a "norm" for the next person. mind your fucking business. you've rendered proof of nothing except your own stupidity
1
so you'll run to juvenile jokes instead of embreacing substantive evidence? that's why your party is losing. your lie is about an unbiased poll: you got exposed. you got mad.... in that order instead of acting like a child, why not address substance? that's what wins every time
1
ONE movie & ONE tv show? you moron. step awaaaay from the keyboard my friend
1
rock hudson was married to phyllis gates. PLENTY of gay men are married. but that's beside my point. sam kennison is far from a social theorist or analyst. he was a jester. but it's ironic that you quote a man, whose aesthetics were pretty gay, to defend your own homophobia. do you even realize how stupid you're looking with every word you type?
1
that's funny. my references were directly from american history or from a group that reported consulting groups. i made no mention of msnbc or the new york times. but i'm glad that you'd keep taking baseless inferences. it makes you an easy target. so let's see this substance you propose. you suggested bias in a poll then offered a biased poll of your own. you tried a historical reference, i examined it. you alluded to the recent election. i alluded to the prior 1. what "substance"?
1
actually poll numbers ARE meaningful. they're a reflection of the opinions of a sample group. if you surveyed 1000 people about the smell of farts. i'm sure they'd tell you that they don't like the smell of farts. that's a ridiculous & childish example. but i guarantee that it's an adequate barometer of people's opinions about the smell of farts
1
for what it's worth, lincoln was a democrat too. but i guess numbers lie. don't get me wrong, history lies all the time. but you can't deny raw data unless you're a fool. look, all you have to do is look at campaign consultants to see that rassmussen is decidedly republican. how can you be so obtuse? for what it's worth, the democrats won the midterm election too. that's how the majority in the legislative branch came to be. do you understand that part?
1
"the liberal media has brainwashed so many of the youth"? how so?
1
my friend, this isn't a debate. you're not my equal. this is me laughing at you. you're a pathetic homophobe who thinks the "liberal media" is out to disturb you're "white safety". you're a dinosaur. in person, you'd be very sad. online, you're just a passing giggle. cheers
1
i guess that means you've conceded. have a good 1
1
well put. that's like saying that the phoenix suns are the best team in history because they socred 154 pts in 1 game this season. i love how an event or a spike is what substitutes for evidence for a norm among idiots like that guy. don't me wrong, i think some of the alarm is a tad bit hysterical. but denying the reality is silly
1
the 60yr old BUILT. i knocked the dust off that....
1
can oyu name a libertarian in office? i sure can't
1
sure, you're entitled to your opinion. this is america & you're allowed to look as stupid as you wish. but indicting the media with weak examples like mtv, brokeback mountain and will & grace is only making you look bad. like i said, there's gonna be gay people. it's a fact of life. you can go live in some little white reality where diversity doesn't exist OR you can join the rest of us here in the 21st century
1
you can call me all the names you like. but the fact still stands: rassmussen is a consultant for the RNC. spare me the nonsense about biases you fucking idiot. also, oyu can talk all this shit about who's kicking who's asses but all i have to do is point to the scorecard. the gop has gotten HAMMERED over the last 4yrs. deal with it btw, i haven't called you a racist. you're dumb enough without the other connotations.
1