Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "World's Dumbest Racists" video.

  1. but pat used a verb in the wrong predication. pat also allowed a typo at his conference. those are clear indications of a lack of english mastery. where are your engllish police to sift through minutia? or maybe, just maybe, you want to back off your bullshit suggestion.
    1
  2. you're right. but as far as the thread goes, he proposed a fine on people's english. i said "fine, but the english police need a grammar detective division. that division needs to investigate buchanan & all those at the english only conference". of course, motion/pulsar/friction (those are many incarnates of the same whackjob) doesn't want those fines for white people. in fact, he did everything to obscure his own premise.
    1
  3. you're partially correct. but your "natural law" is only covered in the bill of rights. most of the constitution's other material concerns sovereignty. in fact, my theory is that if the colonies were fairly represented, we'd still be considered british, french & spanish colonies.
    1
  4. the sign completely encapsulates the issue. the morons of the right wing are so concerned with a language they have not mastered. can you talk about the need to have quality in cheeseburgers if you didn't make the buns with enough yeast?
    1
  5. fined? that's sounds mighty gestapo to me. why not be free market about it & let people sink or swim? but ultimately, how much of a fine is appropriate for buchanan's grammar gaffes or that printed typo? don't worry, i'll wait...
    1
  6. thanks
    1
  7. it doesn't matter if it's a typo. you can't talk about english only if your BANNER lacks mastery of english
    1
  8. that's not even a dictionary definition. if you're going to make up something out of whole cloth, you're not getting any respect. therefore, you're making your race & yourself look bad.
    1
  9. it wouldn't make a difference/ for 1, everyone uses a teleprompter or notes. 2ndly, obama does okay when he's talking extemporaneously. 3rd, you made a severe strawman argument out of a talking point. the issue is about the fines you proposed idiot, not how the president performs his speeches. now get back on target (your OWN target). you suggested fines but as a right winger, you favor free market philosophies sans fines, tariffs & taxes. you frown on federal interference. stay consistent.
    1
  10. there's work here. but more than that, americans buy mexican produce. because the life expectancy of an american is a little better than a mexican. it's not astrophysics (not to say that i'd expect you to wrap your mind around that either). but ultimately, who cares? i'd wager dollars to doughnuts that illegal immigrants have affected me more than you. but they don't bug me. you won't take a look at your own hypocrisy. that's sad.
    1
  11. my latin sucks. i MUST know. what does that mean?
    1
  12. sure, i've already taken them in. i have no problem with that. i'm a real american. now you can keep your resources when you refund your education. then you have to refund the rest of us americans for using our roads & breathing our air. see? you're not an island. it's all or nothing. america is a SHARED community not a series of feudal territories. dipshit
    1
  13. no. there is NOT work there. dude, 14% of americans are out of work HERE.are you really this stupid?
    1
  14. mo ron
    1
  15. am i making a false duality argument? maybe. but i made an express point to get back to your original premise. you, on the other hand, can't stick to your own topic. that's probably because you know how weak it was. but ultimately, he hasn't been attacked for reading a teleprompter. that's merely a talking point. again, how much of a fine does pat get for his poor syntax? what kind of ticket do you write the conference? answer the question.
    1
  16. dude, you're an e-gangster. stop playing yourself.
    1
  17. it astounds you because you're thoughtful. it's hard for a smart person to understand stupid people. don't waste energy trying.
    1
  18. that's not even a statistical possibility. actually, the fbi stats on hate crimes finger white males ad the culprits. try again.
    1
  19. in australia huh? that gives you extra cool points for knowing the proper quote. i forgot "huddled". but my premise is a simple one. we can't pretend as thought that poem is part of the american ethos if it doesn't mean ALL people. the way i see it. it's all or nothing
    1
  20. i think they were interested in being represented if they were going to be taxed.
    1
  21. if you go into politics you have an agenda. it has nothing to do with skin color you moron.
    1
  22. spoken like a true e-thug.
    1
  23. anyone can edit a video & post it. to be honest, i don't give a shit about teleprompters. i'm talking about YOUR premise. i suggest you stay on target. put away the strawmen. fucktard
    1
  24. but ultimately dude, who do you think is working the north-south trail along the continental divide? you suggest that mexicans keep trekking north? fine. i happen to know a few people working on the trail project. who do you think is performing the actual labor? use your head... if you have one
    1
  25. jefferson probably had an IQ in the 140s too. though i doubt that the founding fathers were worried about such drivel. i think the founding fathers were more concerned about private ownership
    1
  26. better yet, i'll fine YOU for having a poor understanding of english.
    1
  27. how many? let's see. there's about 2M actual natives, 194M whites, 34M blacks, 10M asians, 33M hispanics (that's from census data). the wya i see it, let ANYONE in. "bring me your tired, your hungry, your poor. bring your weary masses yearning to breath free." does that ring any bells? liberty bells perhaps
    1
  28. you can't really be that stupid.
    1